EE105 – Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits Prof. Ming C. Wu wu@eecs.berkeley.edu 511 Sutardja Dai Hall (SDH) Lecture14-Frequency Response 1 Amplifier Frequency Response Transfer Function Analysis FL ( s ) = (s + ω ) (s + ω ) ⋅⋅⋅ (s + ω ) (s + ω ) (s + ω ) ⋅⋅⋅ (s + ω ) L Z1 L Z2 L Zk L P1 L P2 L Pk " s %" s % " s % $1+ H '$1+ H ' ⋅⋅⋅ $1+ H ' # ω Z1 &# ω Z 2 & # ω Zl & FH ( s ) = " s %" s % " s % $1+ H '$1+ H ' ⋅⋅⋅ $1+ H ' # ω P1 &# ω P 2 & # ω Pl & Av ( s ) = N ( s ) a0 + a1s + a2 s 2 +... + am s m = D ( s ) b0 + b1s + b2 s 2 +... + bn s n FH ( jω ) →1 for ω << ω ZiH , ω PiH , j = 1... l ∴ AL ( s ) ≅ Amid FL ( s ) Av ( s ) = Amid FL ( s ) FH ( s ) Amid is the midband gain between the lower and upper cutoff frequencies ω L and ω H . Lecture14-Frequency Response FL ( jω ) →1 for ω >> ω ZjL , ω PjL , j = 1... k ∴ AH ( s ) ≅ Amid FH ( s ) 2 1 Low Frequency Dominant Pole Approximation • A Dominant Pole exists if one of the low frequency poles is much larger than the others. – In the graph below case ω = 1000 rad/sec is a dominant pole. All other poles and zeros are at low enough frequencies that they do not affect the lower cutoff frequency ωL. s s +1000 = 200 FL ( s ) ≅ Amid ω L ≅ 1000 rad / sec Lecture14-Frequency Response 3 Lower Cutoff Frequency Calculations If there is no dominant pole at low frequencies, the poles and zeros interact to determine the lower cutoff frequency ω L . For example, suppose: AL ( s ) = Amid FL ( s ) = Amid ( s + ω Z1 ) ( s + ω Z 2 ) ( s + ω P1 ) ( s + ω P 2 ) For s = jω L , AL ( jω L ) = 1 = 2 (ω (ω Amid 2 2 L 2 + ω Z1 ) (ω L2 + ω Z2 2 ) 2 L 2 + ω P1 ) (ω L2 + ω P2 2 ) 4 2 2 2 2 2 1 ω L + (ω Z1 + ω Z 2 )ω L + ω Z1ω Z 2 = 4 2 2 2 ω L + (ω P1 + ω P2 2 )ω L2 + ω P1 ω P2 2 Lower cutoff frequency ω L will be greater than all the individual pole zero frequencies. 2 2 ∴ω L ≅ ω P1 + ω P2 2 − 2ω Z1 − 2ω Z2 2 In general, for n poles and n zeros, ωL ≅ ∑ω n Lecture14-Frequency Response 2 Pn 2 − 2∑ω Z1 n 4 2 Dominant Pole Example • Problem: Find midband gain, FL(s) and fL for ! s $ s# +1& " 100 % AL ( s ) = 2000 (0.1s +1) ( s +1000) • Analysis: Rearranging the given transfer function into standard form, s ( s +100 ) s ( s +100 ) AL ( s ) = 200 = Amid FL ( s ) → Amid = 200 FL ( s ) = ( s +10) ( s +1000) ( s +10) ( s +1000) Zeros: s = 0 and s = -100 Poles: s = -100 and s = -1000 The poles and zeros are all widely separated. The dominant pole is at ω = 1000 and fL ≅ The more exact calculation is fL = ∴ AL ( s ) ≅ 200 s s +1000 1000 = 159 Hz. 2π 1 10 2 +1000 2 − 2 × 0 2 − 2 ×100 2 = 158 Hz 2π Lecture14-Frequency Response 5 High-Frequency Dominant Pole • The lowest of all high frequency poles is called the dominant high-frequency pole. AH ( s ) ≅ Amid FH ( s ) FH ( s ) ≅ 1 1+ ( s ω P3 ) ω H ≅ ω P3 • If there is no dominant pole at high frequencies, the poles and zeros interact to determine ωH. ! s $! s $ #1+ &#1+ & " ω Z1 %" ω Z 2 % AH ( s ) = Amid FH ( s ) = Amid ! s $! s $ #1+ &#1+ & " ω P1 %" ω P 2 % A For s = jω H , Amid ( jω H ) = mid 2 Lecture14-Frequency Response 2 2 ' ! $ *' ! $* )1+ # ω H & ,)1+ # ω H & , )( " ω Z1 % ,+)( " ω Z 2 % ,+ 1 = 2 2 ' ! 2 $ *' ! $* )1+ # ω H & ,)1+ # ω H & , )( " ω P1 % ,+)( " ω P 2 % ,+ 1 1 1 2 2 ≅ + 2 − 2 − 2 2 ωH ω P1 ω P 2 ω Z1 ω Z 2 For the general case of n poles and n zeros, 1 ≅ ωH 1 ∑ω n 2 Pn − 2∑ n 1 2 ω Zn 6 3 High Frequency Dominant Pole Approximation AH ( s ) = Amid FH ( s ) Amid = 200 FH ( s ) ≅ 1 10 6 = 6 1+ s 10 s +10 6 ω H ≅ 10 6 rad / sec ω fH = H ≅ 159 kHz 2π Lecture14-Frequency Response 7 Low-Frequency Poles and Zeros Direct Calculation: C-S Amplifier Vo ( s ) = I o ( s ) R3 = −gmVgs ( s ) Vo ( s ) = −gm ( RD R3 ) RD R3 RD + (1 sC3 ) + R3 s s+ Vgs ( s ) 1 C3 ( RD + R3 ) sC1RG Vg ( s ) = Vi ( s ) sC1 ( RI + RG ) +1 Node Eq. at Source: gm (Vg −Vs ) = 1 RS C2 Vgs ( s ) = Vg −Vs = Vg ( s ) 1 s+ "1 % RS 'C2 $ # gm & s+ C3 C2 C2 Av ( s ) = Vo ( s ) = Amid FL ( s ) Vi ( s ) Amid = −gm ( RD R3 ) Lecture14-Frequency Response Vs + sC2Vs Rs RG RI + RG 8 4 Low-Frequency Poles and Zeros Direct Calculation: C-S Amplifier (cont.) FL ( s ) = ! 1 $ s2 # s + & " RS C2 % *' ' *' * 1 1 1 ,)s + )s + ,)s + , )( ( RI + RG ) C1 ,+)( (1 gm RS ) C2 ,+)( ( RD + R3 ) C3 ,+ The three zero locations are: s = 0, 0, −1 / RS C2 The three pole locations are: s = − 1 1 1 , − , − R + R C 1 g R C R + ( I G ) 1 ( m S ) 2 ( D R3 ) C3 Each independent capacitor in the circuit contributes one pole and one zero. Series capacitors C1 and C3 contribute the two zeros at s = 0 (dc), blocking propagation of dc signals through the amplifier. The third zero due to the parallel combination of C2 and RS occurs at frequency where signal current propagation through the MOSFET is blocked (output voltage is zero). Lecture14-Frequency Response 9 5