Lecture 28: Poynting`s Theorem. Power Flow and Plane Waves.

advertisement
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 1 of 9
Lecture 28: Poynting’s Theorem.
Power Flow and Plane Waves.
A propagating electromagnetic (EM) wave carries energy with
it. Physically this makes sense to us when we listen to the radio
or talk on a cell phone. These types of wireless communications
are possible because EM waves carry energy.
In these examples, some of this EM energy is used to oscillate
electrons in the metal parts of the receiving antenna of our radio
or cell phone, which ultimately results in wireless
communications.
There is a precise mathematical definition of the time rate of
energy flow (i.e., power flow) for EM waves. Before getting to
this, we first need to digress briefly to first discuss Poynting’s
theorem.
Poynting’s Theorem
Poynting’s theorem is a hugely important mathematical
statement in electromagnetics that concerns the flow of power
through space. We’ll derive it now for time-domain fields.
We begin with Maxwell’s curl equations
© 2014 Keith W. Whites
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 2 of 9
B
t
D
 H 
J
t
Next, we employ the vector calculus identity
   E  H   H    E   E    H 
 E  
(1)
(2)
(3)
Substituting (1) and (2) into (3) we have:
B
D
   E  H   H 
E
EJ
(4)
t
t
Using the constitutive equations B   H , D   E , and J   E
in (4) gives
H
E
   E  H    H 
E 
 E  E
(5)
t
t
assuming   f  t  and   f  t  .
In this last equation (5), we can rewrite H  H t as
1 H  H 
1H
2
H


2 t
t 2
t
thinking of the chain rule of differentiation. Consequently, using
this result and a similar one for the E  E t term, (5) becomes
2
2
2
 1
1
 E  H      H   E   E
(6)
t  2
2

This is the point form of what is called Poynting’s theorem.
H
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 3 of 9
Lastly, we integrate this point form equation (6) throughout a
volume v bounded by the closed surface s:
2
2
2
 1
1







E
H
dv

H

E
dv

E
dv



v
v t  2

2

v
where v, s, and ds are related as
ds
Applying the divergence theorem to the LHS of this last
equation gives
  E  H   ds 
s v 
2
2
2
1
 1
    H   E  dv    E dv
t v s   2
2

v s 
(7)
where in moving  t outside of the integral we’re assuming
that v is not a function of time. This result is called the integral
form of Poynting’s theorem.
Discussion of Poynting’s Theorem
While (7) is a hugely important theorem in electromagnetics, we
are not actually going to make any calculations with it in this
course. Rather, we are interested here in elucidating the physical
meaning of the term E  H in the LHS of (7).
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 4 of 9
To understand this physical significance of the LHS of (7), we’ll
begin by looking at the RHS, which has elements you’ve seen
before in EE 381 Electric and Magnetic Fields.
In particular, the first and second terms in the RHS of (7) are the
time rates-of-change of the stored energy in the magnetic and
electric fields inside v. The third term is the Ohmic power
dissipated in v due to the flow of conduction current.
We can now interpret the RHS of (7) as the decrease (because
of the negative sign) in the magnetic and electric power stored in
v, and further reduced by the Ohmic power dissipated in v.
OK, so now here is the payoff: By the conservation of energy
law, all of this represented by the RHS of (7) must equal the
power leaving the volume through the bounding surface s.
Consequently, the quantity E  H in the LHS of (7) is a vector
that must represent the power flow of the EM field leaving the
volume v per unit area. That is, E  H is the power flow density
of electromagnetic fields.
We define this vector
S  t   E  t   H  t  [W/m2]
(or P  E  H ) as the instantaneous Poynting vector.
(8)
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 5 of 9
Multiplying (7) by a negative sign leads to a slightly different
but equivalent way to interpret (7):

  S  ds  Wm  We   P
t
s v 
The LHS is the power flow into s. The first term in the RHS is
the increase in the stored power in the H and E fields in v, while
the second term is the increase in the Ohmic power dissipated in
v.
Power Flow for UPWs
We will now apply this Poynting vector concept to uniform
plane waves. In Example N26.1, we found for a certain UPW
that
E  z , t   aˆ y 43.501cos  6  108 t  21.780 z  V/m
(9)
for the given magnetic field
H  z , t   aˆ x 0.1cos  6  108 t  21.780 z  A/m
This UPW is propagating in the +z direction:
H
E
(10)
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 6 of 9
The instantaneous Poynting vector associated with this UPW
using (8) is then
S  z, t   E  z, t   H  z, t 
   aˆ y  aˆ x  4.350cos 2  6  108 t  21.780 z  W/m 2
such that
S  z , t   aˆ z 4.350cos 2  6  108 t  21.780 z  W/m 2
(11)
The direction of this S  z , t  is aˆ z . This indicates that the flow of
power of this UPW in the same direction as the wave
propagation: in the aˆ z direction.
Time Average Power Flow
Notice in (11) that while S  z , t  oscillates in time, it has a nonzero time average value. (As an aside, this is one of the reasons
why S  z  is not a phasor quantity.)
In
particular,
using
the
trigonometric
identity
cos 2 x  1 2  1 2cos  2 x  , then (11) becomes
S  z , t   aˆ z 2.175 1  cos  2  6  108 t  21.780 z   W/m 2 (12)
The second term in the RHS oscillates in time (at twice the
frequency of E and H ) and has a zero time average value,
while the first term is constant and does not vary with time.


EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 7 of 9
Consequently, the time average value of this Poynting vector in
(12) is
t T
1 0
S av  z    S  z , t  dt  aˆ z 2.175 W/m2
(13)
T t0
This UPW – on time average – carries or transfers power in the
direction that the wave is propagating.
Sinusoidal Steady State Time Average Power Flow
It turns out that there is another way to calculate this time
average Poynting vector for sinusoidal steady state fields, and to
calculate it directly from phasor fields.
We derive this expression beginning with (8) and writing E  t 
and H  t  in terms of their phasor forms
S t   E t   H t 
(14)
jt
jt
 Re  Ee   Re  He 
For evaluating (14), note that
Re  Ee jt   Re  He jt   Re  E  He j 2t 
Rather, we can employ
Re  A  
in (14) to give
1
A  A* 

2
(15)
EE 382
Lecture 28
Page 8 of 9
1
1
Ee jt  E *e  jt    He jt  H *e  jt 

2
2
1
  E  He j 2t  E  H *  E *  H  E *  H *e  j 2t 
4
which we can write as
*
1
j 2 t
j 2 t
*
*
S  t   E  H  E  He
  E  H  E  He   (16)

4 
S t  
We can recognize the RHS as a term plus its complex conjugate.
So once again using (15), (16) becomes
1
(17)
S  t   Re  E  H *  E  He j 2t 
2
Integrating this expression over one time period, as defined in
(13), we find from (17) that
1
S av  Re  E  H *   W m 2 
(18)
2
Using this equation, we can compute a time averaged quantity
( S av ) directly from phasor domain quantities ( E and H ).
For the UPW of Example N26.1, the phasor form of E and H
are
E  z   aˆ y 43.501e  j 21.780 z V/m
and
H  z   aˆ x 0.1e  j 21.780 z A/m
Using (18), the time average Poynting vector is then
EE 382
Lecture 28
1
S av  Re  aˆ y 43.501e  j 21.780 z  aˆ x 0.1e  j 21.780 z 
2
1
 Re  aˆ z 4.350  aˆ z 2.175 W/m 2
2
Page 9 of 9
(19)
This is the same result we found in (13) using the time domain
forms of E and H . Here in (18) we find a time averaged
quantity directly from the phasor domain fields. Neat!
Download