“I found it on the Internet” The promises and perils of opportunistic data in qualitative research CHRISTINE HINE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF SURREY “I found it on the Internet” A research journey – from exotic Internet to mundane online spaces The tradition of “found data” in social research Mumsnet – using found data to illuminate parenting practices Mumsnet as a research object: influences, constraints, biases Opportunism as a promising yet risky research strategy A research journey from exotic Internet to mundane online spaces 1990s The Internet as an exotic environment, detached from everyday experience… cyberspace A clear separation between online and offline A case to be made for social research to take the Internet seriously 2015 The Internet as an increasingly mundane conduit for everyday life A “data deluge” – online manifestations of all aspects of life there for the taking A tendency to take data from online space as reflective of “the public” Found data and social research A tradition of utilising data that is generated without our intervention Lee (2000), Webb et al (1981), Kellehear (1993) Avoids concerns about the artificiality of data generated by the researcher’s intervention, especially where Topic is sensitive/answers may be socially undesirable Topic may be too trivial to recall Concern is to avoid leading questioning Gets closer to the messy reality of lived experience Reduces burden on research participants Found data and social research Found data can involve creative reinterpretations of the traces that everyday activities leave behind E.g. Nose prints on museum exhibit glass (Webb et al ,1981) Graffiti and urban culture (Rodriguez, 2003) Political talk in the hair salon (Press and Johnson-Yale 2008) But… this approach comes with some issues concerning robustness of interpretations Online forums as sources of found data Seale et al (2010) Online forums compare favourably with interviews as a way of exploring health issues Harvey et al (2007) Online forums for exploring teenage perceptions of sexual health: frank discussions making more use of everyday terminology than interviews Now… online forums have become a credible source especially in health research But… how can we interpret the significance of what happens online when we rely on found data? Mumsnet headlice dataset Threads with headlice/nits in the message subject in 2010 62 threads, 1127 messages Subject to coding in Nvivo According to proposed treatment According to emergent themes risks, treatment failure, emotions, parenting expectations, sources of expertise, school policy, family, friendship Children’s health – 32 threads, average 10.7 messages General health 8 threads, average 10.5 messages Am I being unreasonable? 6 threads, average 54.8 messages Mumsnet headlice themes Emotional registers and the risks of infestation Mechanisms of removal Emphasis on anecdotal evidence Reference to life cycle facts – but little verification Risks of treatments Disgust rather than shame, or direct health risk “putting chemicals on a child’s head” Sources of expertise Parents as experts, rather than healthcare professionals Mumsnet headlice themes Representations of responsible parenthood Exploring the boundaries of parental autonomy, with respect to kinship groups, friends, schools, blended families and the state Emergent disjunctures between parenting advice aimed at nuclear families, and the lived experience of diverse family structures A site for portrayal of contemporary parenting, as a morally charged and socially situated practice Mumsnet as a portrayal of everyday life Not a form of discussion that happens at the school gates Not likely to emerge in interviews A unique, situated data set, neither artificial nor generalizable The Internet demographic The Mumsnet demographic Those who post vs those who simply read Site conventions and the cultural expectations on style Conventions of AIBU vs other types of thread Mumsnet headlice data set Not an insight into public perceptions of science, per se Not possible to define with any certainty who these people are A source of discourse, generated in context as any discourse would be An insight into what some people do with science, and how they contextualise it against other forms of knowledge Authentic as one portrayal of contemporary parenting in circulation A form of data that escapes the artificiality of social research data collection methods, but brings its own limitations Conclusions : opportunism as a risky strategy This is a small data example, not big data However, the issues raised by analysis of this small data don’t go away if we scale up Looking at found data on a massive scale brings benefits, but it doesn’t eradicate the underlying contextual nature of the data Contextualising factors: Internet demographics, platform characteristics, platform demographics, socially patterned usage styles, local and micro-local cultures, algorithmic factors… The Internet is, and is not, society as we know it Big data, and data found on the Internet do not offer a perfect solution for a problem of data scarcity in social research Conclusions: opportunism as a risky strategy The contemporary celebration of big data, and other approaches to found data on the Internet, is promisingly risky Promising: an unprecedented scale of data availability for exploration of patterns of social activity Promising: insights into aspects of everyday life hitherto inaccessible Risky: still only a limited window on the messy reality of the everyday Risky: constrained in key ways by the specificities of the online situation Risky: marginalises key sectors of the population who are not online, or whose online activities do not leave a public trace Harvey KJ, Brown B, Crawford P, Macfarlane A, McPherson A. 2007. 'Am I normal?' Teenagers, sexual health and the internet. Social Science & Medicine 65(4): 771-81 Hine, C. (2014) Headlice eradication as everyday engagement with science. An analysis of online parenting discussions. Public Understanding of Science 23(5) 574–591 Kellehear, A. (1993) The Unobtrusive Researcher: A Guide to Methods St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin. Lee, R. M. (2000) Unobtrusive methods in social research. Buckingham: Open University Press. Press, A. and C. Johnson-Yale (2008) Political talk and the flow of ambient television. Women watching Oprah in an African American hair salon. In New Directions in American Reception Study. Ed. P. Goldstein and J. L. Machor. New York: Oxford University Press pp. 307-325. Rodriguez, A. (2003) Sense-making artifacts on the margins of cultural spaces. In Expressions of Ethnography: Novel Approaches to Qualitative Methods. Ed. R. P. Clair. Albany: State University of New York Press pp. 231-140. Seale, C., J. Charteris-Black, et al. (2010). Interviews and Internet Forums: A Comparison of Two Sources of Qualitative Data. Qualitative Health Research 20(5): 595-606. Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, L. Sechrest and J. B. Grove (1981) Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin. 2nd edn.