IPEC 2005
SINGAPORE TURF CLUB
COST-SAVING SOLUTION FOR ITS FLOODLIGHTS SYSTEM
QUALITY POWER MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
JUNG POWER MANAGEMENT PTE LTD
SINGAPORE
TURF CLUB
CLUB
SINGAPORE TURF
FLOODLIGHTING
SYSTEM
COST
FLOODLIGHTING
SYSTEM
REDUCTION
SOLUTION
COST
REDUCTION
SOLUTION
Ken Jung, Jung Power Management Pte Ltd, Director, B.A.Sc (Univ of Toronto, EE), C. Eng (UK),
P. Eng (Singapore, Ontario, Canada)
Raymond Tan Kar Eng, Quality Power Management Pte Ltd, Technical Support Engineer,
B. Eng (Nanyang Technological University),
Stanley Chung Der Chyuan, Quality Power Management Pte Ltd, Technical Support Engineer,
B. Eng (Curtin University of Technology),
Eugene Teo Tiong Jin, Electrical Engineer of Singapore Turf Club, B. Eng (Electrical & Electronics)
URL:
Email:
http://www.qpower.com.sg
general@qpower.com.sg
URL: http://www.turfclub.com.sg
Email: Eugene_teo@turfclub.com.sg
Quality Power Management (QPM) and Singapore Turf Club
(STC) introduces a newly implemented power management
solution. This new power management solution focuses on
system integration to reduce the cost of STC’s power supply
bills, and also maximizes the potential of existing power
generators in STC’s backup system that are currently under
utilized.
Singapore Turf Club
Singapore Turf Club (STC) is Singapore’s only racecourse
operator. Located in Kranji, its operations cover a land area of
81.2 hectares, housing state-of-the-art facilities and supporting
services dedicated to horse-racing. This includes over 400
betting windows with ACCESS terminal points, an auditorium
with a 100 people capacity, 450 video screens, closed circuit
television monitors, electronic dividend boards, multi-use
function rooms and F&B facilities.
An immense amount of power is required to sustain STC’s
operation and the load is shouldered by a few incomers from
PowerGrid. Power is distributed using various broken ring
network configurations, via several substations located within
the racecourse. Strategically placed network cuts in the ring
networks enhance the reliability of the system.
The Floodlighting System
The web of floodlights that illuminate the racecourse grounds
is fundamental to STC’s operation. In all, there are
approximately 2,500 track floodlight bulbs installed on the
roof of the grandstand, camera towers and 42 high-masts
around the racetrack for night racing. The existing track
floodlighting system is powered by a number of 22kV / 400V
substations (See Figure 1).
70 % of
Floodlights Supply
Racetrack
Floodlights from
Normal
Switchboards.
Power Grid Supply
Auto-Transfer
Switch
30 % of
Floodlight Supply
UPS System
Generators act as the
backup source for the
30% of the floodlight.
Racetrack
Floodlights from
Emergency
Switchboards.
Feedback & Control
Existing Generators
Figure 1: Existing System
1
2
70% of the track floodlighting system is connected to the
70% ofswitchboards,
the track floodlighting
system is
connected
to the
normal
while the remaining
30%
is connected
to
normal
switchboards,
the remaining
is connected
to
the
emergency
supplywhile
switchboards.
The30%
emergency
supply
the emergencyis supply
The emergency
switchboard
backedswitchboards.
up by standby
generatorssupply
and
switchboard isPower
backed
up (UPS).
by standby generators and
Uninterruptible
Supply
Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS).
In a normal power supply failure condition, the UPS will be
In a normal
power
supply
the UPS will
be
able
to support
up to
30% failure
of the condition,
track floodlighting
system
able
to support
30%
of the track
system
requirements
forupa to
short
duration,
duringfloodlighting
which the standby
requirements
a short duration,
generators
willforauto-start
and take during
over towhich
supplythe
thestandby
power
generators
willgenerator
auto-startmode
and take
over to supply
power
needed.
When
is activated,
the UPSthe
batteries
needed.
When generator
mode is activated, the UPS batteries
will
be charged
simultaneously.
will be charged simultaneously.
Picture 1: STC at night with the floodlights in full swing
Picture 1: STC at night with the floodlights in full swing
Measures are in place to minimise any occurrence of major
Measures
are in
to minimise
anya occurrence
major
power
outages
butplace
blackouts
are always
possibility. of
With
the
power outagessystem
but blackouts
always
a possibility.
With
the
floodlighting
being aare
critical
installation
for the
STC,
floodlighting
system
critical
installation
for crucial.
the STC,
backup
plans over
andbeing
abovea the
existing
system are
backup plans over and above the existing system are crucial.
Situation Analysis
As
PowerGrid’s
Situation
Analysissupply has been consistently reliable, STC
As
PowerGrid’s
been their
consistently
reliable,power
STC
found
that it wassupply
under has
utilising
fully installed
found that
it wasthat
under
utilisingontheir
fully to
installed
power
backup
system
is always
standby
be activated
backupPowerGrid’s
system thatsupply
is always
on standby to be activated
should
discontinue.
should PowerGrid’s supply discontinue.
STC’s monthly load profile fluctuates - from 25% on non race
STC’stomonthly
load profile
from
25% oncontracted
non race
days
100% during
night fluctuates
races - of -the
declared
days to 100%
during
- of thefor
declared
contracted
capacity.
During
nightnight
racingraces
(scheduled
three Fridays
per
capacity. the
During
nightmay
racing
(scheduled
for three
Fridays per
month),
demand
shoot
up to 100%.
However,
the
month), thedemand
demand drops
may shoot
up to
100%.
the
maximum
to 60%
during
dayHowever,
racing (on
maximum and
demand
drops and
to 60%
racing days
(on
Saturdays
Sundays)
25% during
during day
non-race
Saturdays
and hours).
Sundays) and 25% during non-race days
(weekday office
(weekday office hours).
The large number of floodlights consumes an enormous
The large
numberSTC
of therefore
floodlightshasconsumes
enormous
amount
of energy.
to look atan
a more
costamount ofway
energy.
STC therefore
has to lookcritical
at a more
costefficient
to power
up its operation’s
electrical
efficient Inway
to so,
power
up its
operation’s
electrical
system.
doing
it could
lower
its Totalcritical
Operating
Costs
system. In doing so, it could lower its Total Operating Costs
(TOC).
(TOC).
QPM was thus brought in to develop an understanding of the
QPM was
thus brought
to developrequirements
an understanding
of the
energy
consumption
andin
operational
of STC.
energy consumption and operational requirements of STC.
Recommendation
With
the assistance of STC, QPM analysed and proposed
Recommendation
With
assistance
of STC,to QPM
analysed
proposed
severalthe
possible
alternatives
provide
reliable and
power
to the
severalfloodlights,
possible alternatives
to provide
reliable power
the
track
before deriving
at a solution
for thetomost
track floodlights,
deriving
at a solution
for the most
economical
means before
to power
up the track
floodlights.
economical means to power up the track floodlights.
QPM recommended the Peak Shaving technique. Instead of
QPM
recommended
Peakfrom
Shaving
technique.
of
receiving
electricity the
supply
PowerGrid
withInstead
standby
receiving sets
electricity
supplysource,
from QPM
PowerGrid
withthat
standby
generator
as a backup
suggested
STC
generatorthis
sets
as a backup
source,
suggested
that
STC
reverse
operation
by using
its QPM
existing
generator
sets
as
reverse
this source.
operation by using its existing generator sets as
the
primary
the primary source.
The existing generator sets will be used to supply power to
The existing
generator
sets will
used to
supply
to
30%
of the track
floodlights
and be
essential
loads,
withpower
backup
30%power
of thesupply
track floodlights
and essential
loads, with
by
from PowerGrid.
This method
will backup
enable
by powerstandby
supplygenerator
from PowerGrid.
method
will savings
enable
existing
sets to beThis
utilised
and cost
existing
generatorHowever,
sets to be the
utilised
and cost
savings
can
thusstandby
be achieved.
existing
Automatic
can thus Switch
be achieved.
However,
the existing
Automatic
Transfer
(ATS) had
to be modified
to cater
for this
Transfer Switch (ATS) had to be modified to cater for this
operation.
operation.
With this approach, 30% of floodlights that are connected to
Withemergency
this approach,
30% will
of floodlights
that are
to
the
supply
be powered
by connected
the existing
the emergency supply will be powered by the existing
generators.
generators.
As for the remaining 70%, STC could choose to implement
As for
themethod,
remaining
70%,
could choose
to to
implement
the
same
though
an STC
investment
will have
be made
the same
method,
though as
an the
investment
have to can
be made
for
additional
generators
existingwill
generators
only
for additional
generators
as the existing
generators can only
power
up to 30%
of the floodlight
load requirements.
power up to 30% of the floodlight load requirements.
There are a few types of generators to choose from, but motorThere are a(MG)
few types
generators
choose
butbecause
motorgenerator
type of
generator
setstoare
mostfrom,
suited
generator
(MG)
type
generator
sets up
are during
most suited
because
they
do not
need
UPS
as a back
the transition
they dothus
noteliminating
need UPSthe
as cost
a back
up during UPS.
the transition
period,
of maintaining
period, thus eliminating the cost of maintaining UPS.
However, QPM suggests that the existing UPS system be
However,only
QPM
suggests
the existing
UPS system
be
removed
if the
existingthat
generators
are replaced
with MG
removed
only if the existing generators are replaced with MG
type
generators.
type generators.
Recommendation Rationale
By
using existing generator
Recommendation
Rationalesets as a primary source, STC will
By able
usingtoexisting
generator
sets ascontracted
a primary source,
will
be
save on
its monthly
capacitySTC
charge,
be able
to save onreceiving
its monthly
contracted
charge,
while
concurrently
reliable
supply capacity
from PowerGrid
while
concurrently
receiving reliable supply from PowerGrid
as
a secondary
source.
as a secondary source.
With MG type generator sets installed, the racecourse will
With
MGfurther
type savings
generator
installed,
the racecourse
generate
by sets
reducing
maintenance
costs onwill
the
generate
further
by reducing
maintenance
on the
UPS.
This
capitalsavings
investment
could be
moderated costs
by utilizing
UPS. This
capital investment
couldthe
be implementation
moderated by utilizing
existing
generator
sets first, with
of the
existing portions
generatorinsets
first, Awith
implementation
of the
various
stages.
riskthecomparison
of different
various portions
in stages.
risk comparison
possibilities
of power
failure A
is tabulated
as shownofindifferent
Table 1
possibilities
of power failure
for the implementation
stages.is tabulated as shown in Table 1
for the implementation stages.
2
2
3
Failure Descriptions
Mains failure
Present
30% lights sustain for 5mins by
UPS. Generators take over supply
immediately if started successfully.
Not noticeable if UPS goes to auto
bypass.
Not noticeable.
UPS failure
Generators failure
Mains & UPS failure
Total failure at the respective
quadrant that the UPS failed.
Total failure at the respective
quadrant if the generators failed to
start after the UPS batteries are
depleted.
Not noticeable.
Total failure.
Mains & Generators failure
Generators & UPS failure
Mains, Generators & UPS failure
Proposed
30% lights which are powered by
generators will not be affected.
Not noticeable if UPS goes to auto
bypass.
30% lights sustained for 5mins by
UPS. Mains take over supply
immediately.
30% lights which are powered by
generators will not be affected.
Total failure at the respective
quadrant if the generators failed
after the UPS batteries are
depleted.
Mains take over supply.
Total failure.
Table 1: Risk Comparison of failures between Present System and Proposed Modifications to the system
Proposed Implementation
The existing 30% of the track floodlighting system connected
to the emergency switchboards are powered using existing
generators as the primary source (as shown in Figure 2).
Auto-Transfer Switch (ATS) is used to switch the supply
from the primary source to the secondary source. The
floodlights are supported by the existing UPS system to ensure
a smooth switch over in the event of a power interruption.
The new generator system will be classified into two different
modes of operation: “Normal Mode” and “Race Mode” (see
Figure 3). During normal operations, the track floodlighting
system will be in “Normal Mode”.
During night racing, the mode of operation will be switched to
“Race Mode” operation.
Under “Normal Mode”, the track floodlighting system utilises
power from PowerGrid as the primary source. The ATS will
be programmed to monitor the power supply from PowerGrid.
If the automatic main failure detects no power from
Power Grid
Supply
PowerGrid, it will start up STC’s generator sets and
automatically switch over to this secondary source.
Under “Race Mode”, the track floodlighting system will be
powered by STC’s own generator sets as the primary source.
The ATS is programmed to monitor the power source from the
generator sets, and if it detects no transmission of power, it
will automatically switch over to the secondary source – now
PowerGrid.
A trial run was done to confirm the feasibility of the
implementation. The supply to the emergency boards was
switched over with the generators as the primary source and
PowerGrid as secondary. The trial successfully confirmed that
the generators are able to support all loads connected to the
emergency switchboards.
Data collected from the trial as well as from PowerGrid on the
energy consumed was collated and analysed. Based on the
findings, QPM recommended that implementation be
completed in stages (one substation at a time).
Track
Floodlights
from Normal
Switchboards.
70 % Supply
PowerGrid act as
the backup source
for the 30% of
floodlight.
Existing
Generators
30 %
Supply
Feedback
& Control
AutoTransfer
Switch
Track
Floodlights from
Emergency
Switchboards
UPS
System
Figure 2: New Proposed System
3
4
STC floodlights
system
Mode of
Operation
Normal Mode
No
ATS
change
over to
Generator
Supply
Race Mode
Power
Source from
PowerGrid?
No
ATS
change
over to
PowerGrid
Supply
Yes
Supply to
Track
floodlights
Power
Source from
Generator?
Yes
Supply to
Track
floodlights
Figure 3: Flow Chart - Floodlights mode of operation
4
5
Business
BusinessBenefits
Benefits
Before
BeforeImplementation
Implementation
The
Theproposed
proposednew
newsystem
systemwill
willrun
runononexisting
existinggenerators
generatorsand
and
UPS
UPSsystem,
system,which
whichinvolves
involveslittle
littlecapital
capitalinvestment,
investment,except
except
29%
29%
for
forthe
thecost
costofofmodifying
modifyingthe
theoperational
operationalfunction
functionofofthe
the
existing
existingATS
ATSasasrequired.
required.This
Thisinvestment
investmentcost
costisisbasically
basicallythe
the
labour
labourcost
costand
andthe
thematerial
materialcost,
cost,which
whichisisabout
about$1,000
$1,000per
per
generator
generatorset.
set.This
Thiscovers
coversthe
thecost
costofofboth
bothlocal
localand
andremote
remote
control
controlbybythe
theBuilding
BuildingAutomation
AutomationSystem
System(BAS).
(BAS).
Peak
PeakEnergy
EnergyCharge
Charge
Off-Peak
Off-PeakCharge
Charge
Reactive
ReactivePower
PowerChargeable
Chargeable
Contracted
ContractedCapacity
CapacityCharge
Charge
0%
0%
Should
Shouldthe
theimplementation
implementationbebecarried
carriedout
outininitsitsentirety,
entirety,STC
STC
expects
expectstotosee
seeananimmediate
immediatesaving
savingofofapproximately
approximately3%
3%ofofitsits
12%
12%
monthly
monthlyelectricity
electricitybill
billasasseen
seenininthe
thecalculations
calculationsininTable
Table2.2.
This
Thisisisclearly
clearlyplotted
plottedininthe
thepie-charts
pie-chartsasasshown
shownininFigure
Figure4.4.
The
Theinvestment
investmentneeded
neededtotomodify
modifythis
thissystem
systemwill
willbebeminimal
minimal
with
with barely
barely noticeable
noticeable changes
changes toto the
the way
way the
the system
system isis
After
AfterImplementation
Implementation
operating.
operating.
3%
1%
1% 3%
Analysis
Analysisbased
basedon
onthe
thefollowing
followingassumptions:
assumptions:
- - Total
Totalrating
ratingofofstandby
standbygenerator
generator
sets
sets
- - Standby
Standbygenerator
generatorsets
setsoperations
operations
per
pernight
nightrace
raceininhours
hours
- - Number
Numberofofnight
nightrace
raceper
permonth
month
- - Cost
Costofofoperating
operatingthe
thestandby
standby
generator
generatorsets
sets(include
(includefuel
fueland
and
maintenance)
maintenance)
- - Cost
Costofofelectricity
electricityconsumption
consumption
- - Cost
CostofofContracted
ContractedCapacity
Capacity
59%
59%
2,000
2,000kW
kW
Peak
PeakEnergy
EnergyCharge
Charge
Off-Peak
Off-PeakCharge
Charge
Reactive
ReactivePower
PowerChargeable
Chargeable
Contracted
ContractedCapacity
CapacityCharge
Charge
Generator
GeneratorFuel
FuelUsage
Usage
Saving
Saving
26%
26%
55hours
hours
33night
nightrace
race
S$0.20
S$0.20/ /kWh
kWh
0%
0%
12%
12%
58%
58%
S$0.12
S$0.12/ /kWh
kWh
S$7.04
S$7.04/ /kW
kW
Before
BeforeImplementation
Implementation
(Using
(UsingPowerGrid
PowerGridSource
Sourcewithout
withoutgenerator
generatorsets)
sets)
STC
STChas
hascurrently
currentlyimplemented
implementedthe
therecommendation
recommendationininone
oneofof
itsitssubstations
substationswith
withimmediate
immediatesavings
savingsofofabout
about1%
1%ofofthe
the
monthly
monthlybills.
bills.
- - Monthly
MonthlyContracted
ContractedCapacity
CapacityFee
Fee
(based
(basedononthe
thetotal
totalrating
ratingofof
generator
generatorsets,
sets,2,000
2,000kW)
kW)
- - Monthly
Monthlyelectricity
electricityconsumption
consumption
cost
cost(with
(withreference
referencetotothe
theelectricity
electricity
consumption
consumptionfrom
fromthe
thestandby
standby
generator
generatorsets)
sets)
2,000kW
2,000kWxxS$7.04
S$7.04
The
Theprojected
projected3%
3%savings
savingswill
willbebeachieved
achievedonce
oncethe
theother
other
==S$
S$14,080.00
14,080.00
substations
substationsimplement
implementthis
thisPeak
PeakShaving
Shavingtechnique
techniqueofofutilising
utilising
the
theexisting
existingstandby
standbygenerator
generatorsets
setsduring
duringnight
nightracing.
racing.
2,000kW
2,000kWxx55
hours
hoursxx33nights
nightsxx
Conclusion
Conclusion
S$0.12
S$0.12
STC
STCisisconfident
confidentofofachieving
achievingthe
thesavings
savingsasasstated
statedbased
basedonon
==S$3,600.00
S$3,600.00
allallthe
thecost
costsaving
savingdata
datacollated
collatedfor
forthe
thepast
pastone
oneyear
yearononthe
the
designated
designatedgenerator.
generator.The
Theengineering
engineeringteam
teamisisnow
nowlooking
looking
Total
Total S$17,680.00
S$17,680.00
into
intofurther
furthersavings
savingsby
byoperating
operatingsome
someofofthe
theair
airconditioning
conditioning
chillers
chillersononthe
thegenerators
generatorsduring
duringrace
racedays.
days.By
Byalternating
alternatingthe
the
After
AfterImplementation
Implementation
roles
rolesofofSTC’s
STC’sown
owngenerators
generatorsand
andPowerGrid’s
PowerGrid’ssupply,
supply,STC
STC
(Using
(Usinggenerator
generatorsets)
sets)
will
willbebeable
abletotoachieve
achieveeven
evengreater
greatersavings
savingsthan
thanthe
theprojected
projected
3%
3%from
fromitsitsmonthly
monthlyelectric
electricbills.
bills.This
Thisisisaccomplished
accomplishedbyby
- - Monthly
2,000kW
Monthlycost
costofofoperating
operatingthe
the
2,000kWxx55
making
makinguse
useofofunder
underutilised
utilisedinvestments
investmentsthat
thatSTC
STChas
hasalready
already
standby
standbygenerator
generatorsets
sets(inclusive
(inclusiveofof hours
hoursxx33nights
nightsxx
made
madeininitsitsbackup
backupgenerators.
generators.The
Thecost
costofofimplementing
implementingthis
this
fuel
S$0.20
fueland
andmaintenance
maintenancecost)
cost)
S$0.20
new
newsystem
systemisisnegligible
negligiblecompared
comparedtotothe
theoverall
overallsavings
savingsand
and
==S$
S$6,000.00
6,000.00
effective
effectiveuse
useofofitsitsexisting
existingequipment.
equipment.
Total
Total S$6,000.00
S$6,000.00
Saving
Saving
- - Saving
Savingper
permonth
month
S$17,680.00
S$17,680.00
––S$
S$6,000.00
6,000.00
==S$
S$11,
11,680.00
680.00
Table
Table2:2:Analysis
Analysisofofcost
costsaving
saving
55
6
e thanks to
ctured here
s article.
g, “Power
dition, John
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to
Singapore Turf Club whose input and images pictured here
Acknowledgement
has
helped to clarify and improve the content of this article.
The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to
Singapore Turf Club whose input and images pictured here
has helped to clarify and improve the content of this article.
Reference
[1] Allen J. Wood, Bruee F. Woollenberg, “Power
Generating, Operation and Control”, 2nd edition, John
Reference
Wiley & Sons Inc, 1996
[1]
Bruee F. Woollenberg,
“Power–
[2] Allen
Griffith.J.C. Wood,
David, “Uninterruptible
Power Supplies
John
Generating,
OperationforandCritical
Control”,
2nd edition,Marcel
Power Conditioners
Equipment”,
Wiley
Sons
Inc,York,
19961989
Dekker&Inc,
New
[2]
David,
“Uninterruptible
Power
Supplies
–
[3] Griffith.
Roger C. C.
Dugen,
Mark
F. McGranagham,
Surya
Santoso,
Power
Conditioners
for Critical
Equipment”,
Marcel
H. Wayne
Beaty, “Electrical
Power Systems
Quality”,
2nd
Dekker McGraw
Inc, New–York,
1989
edition
Hill, 2003
[3] Ken
RogerJung,
C. Dugen,
McGranagham,
Santoso,
[4]
Martin Mark
Lim, F.
Ben
Lau, Neo Poh Surya
Hua, Nicholas
nd
H. Wayne
Beaty, “Electrical
Power Systems
Quality”,
Neo
“Strategic
Energy Procurement:
Your
Key 2to
edition McGraw
– Hill, 2003 in single and multi-tenanted
effective
energy management
[4] Ken
Jung,The
Martin
Lim, Ben
Lau, Neo
Poh Hua, Nicholas
premises,
Singapore
Engineer
No. 128/01/2003
Neo “Strategic Energy Procurement: Your Key to
effective energy management in single and multi-tenanted
premises,
The Singapore Engineer No. 128/01/2003
About
the companies
Quality Power Management Pte Ltd
QPM, an engineering service-oriented company, has achieved
About the companies
significant
recognition amongst the high-tech industrial and
Quality Power
Management
Pte Ltdand government bodies.
multinational
commercial,
residential
QPM,core
an engineering
has achieved
Our
expertise isservice-oriented
in providing company,
a comprehensive
and
significant solution
recognition
the high-tech
industrial
and
integrated
for amongst
the development
of electrical
power
multinational
residentialdisruption
and government
quality needscommercial,
to ensure minimal
to yourbodies.
daily
Our coreactivities.
expertise is in providing a comprehensive and
business
integrated solution for the development of electrical power
qualitywas
needs
to ensure
disruption
daily
QPM
established
fromminimal
the observation
that to
theyour
increasing
business activities.
presence
of modern electronic equipments such as variable
speed drives, uninterruptible power supplies, computers,
QPM was established
from etc,
the observation
thedegradation
increasing
communication
equipment
contributed that
to the
presence
modern
electronic electrical
equipments
such and
as variable
of
power of
quality
by distorting
voltage
current
speed drives,Hence,
uninterruptible
powersystem
supplies,
computers,
waveforms.
the electrical
becomes
more
communication
equipment
etc, contributed to the degradation
vulnerable
to failure
if left unattended.
of power quality by distorting electrical voltage and current
waveforms.
theourelectrical
system becomes
more
QPM
strives Hence,
to develop
area of specialisation
in order
to
vulnerable
failure if left
unattended.
deliver
an toexcellent
one-stop
service that addresses such
situations and to advise companies on the appropriate action to
QPM
strives
to develop
area ofThis
specialisation
order to
be taken
in rectifying
theour
situation.
enables theincompany
deliver
an excellent
service
that of
addresses
such
to
function
effectivelyone-stop
by keeping
abreast
the evolving
situations and
companies
on the appropriate action to
technology
andtotoadvise
acquire
higher returns.
be taken in rectifying the situation. This enables the company
to function
by Pte
keeping
Jung
Power effectively
Management
Ltd abreast of the evolving
technology
to acquire higher
returns.
Jung Powerand
Management
Pte Ltd
(JPM) specializes in the
provision of premium licensing services. Its pool of client
Jung Power
Pte Ltd
ranges
fromManagement
large private
corporations to government
Jung PowertoManagement
Ltd (JPM) specializes
in the
ministries
managementPtecorporations
and its area
of
provision of
premium licensing
services.
Its poolretail
of client
expertise
encompasses
commercial,
residential,
and
ranges
large private corporations to government
industrialfrom
premises.
ministries to management corporations and its area of
expertise
encompasses
commercial,
residential,
retail
and
JPM
also has
extensive experience
in providing
a host
of other
industrialincluding
premises.attendance to emergency malfunction and
services
breakdowns, recommendations for maintenance and
JPM also has extensive experience in providing a host of other
services including attendance to emergency malfunction and
breakdowns, recommendations for maintenance and
improvement of electrical installations, electrical system
trouble-shooting.
Singapore Turf Club
Singapore Turf Club operates horse racing and gaming
business in Singapore. In addition to the facilities at Singapore
Racecourse in Kranji, there are another 170 branches located
7
around Singapore to serve its customers’ needs. Details of the
club could be found in http://www.turfclub.com.sg
improvement of electrical installations, electrical system
trouble-shooting.
improvement
electrical installations, electrical system
Singapore
TurfofClub
trouble-shooting.
Singapore
Turf Club operates horse racing and gaming
business in Singapore. In addition to the facilities at Singapore
Singapore Turf
Club there are another 170 branches located
Racecourse
in Kranji,
Singapore
Turf Club
operates
horse racing
and gaming
around
Singapore
to serve
its customers’
needs. Details
of the
business
inbe
Singapore.
In addition to the facilities at Singapore
club could
found in http://www.turfclub.com.sg
Racecourse in Kranji, there are another 170 branches located
around Singapore to serve its customers’ needs. Details of the
club could be found in http://www.turfclub.com.sg
6
6