USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Appendix A EPA Phase 2 Qualified Hydronic Heaters A-1
List of Cleaner Hydronic Heaters | Burn Wise | US EPA
1 of 3
http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/owhhlist.html
http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/owhhlist.html
Burn Wise
You are here: EPA Home
Share
Air & Radiation
Burn Wise
Partners
Program Participation
List of Cleaner Hydronic Heaters
Partners Program Participation List of Cleaner Hydronic Heaters
Breathe Easier with Cleaner Outdoor Wood-Fired Heaters (PDF) (1pg, 451k, About PDF)
Below is the Phase 2 list of cleaner burning hydronic heaters that qualify for EPA's Outdoor Wood-Fired Hydronic Heater program. Phase 2 units have a white tag and are about
90 percent cleaner than unqualified units. EPA's Phase 1 models are no longer considered "qualified" under the Program after March 31, 2010. Use of permanent labels and
hang tags for these models must be discontinued on units manufactured after that date. You can find Phase 1 archived here.
Please Note All data are according to EPA Method 28 OWHH unless otherwise noted.
Phase 2 White Tag Models
Manufacturer
Central Boiler
Model Name &
Heat Output
Number
Rating
Maxim
M250
(1)
Efficiency Annual
(1)
212,453 BTU/hr 87.8 %
high
Average
Emission
Input
Heat
(2)
Highest
Annual Average
Output Annual Individual
Average
Test Run
Rate
Emission
Level
Emission
Level
1.6
grams/hr
0.05
lbs/million
0.06
4.9
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
0.10
lbs/million
0.12
5.4
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
heating
value
Heat
Fuel Type
wood pellets;
continuous feed
0.07 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
95.5 %
low
heat output
heating
value
Central Boiler
E-Classic
2400
186,453 BTU/hr 85.3 %
high
3.3
grams/hr
heating
value
0.03 grams/hr/
92.6 %
10,000 BTU
heat output
stick wood;
batch load
low
heating
value
Aqua-Therm
Kunzel
45,506 BTU/hr 82.5 %
0.7
0.08
0.13
PK-20
high
heating
grams/hr
lbs/million
BTU input
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
output
2.64
wood pellets;
continuous feed
value
0.24 grams/hr/
2.3
0.12
0.16
wood pellets;
grams/hr
lbs/million
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
10,000 BTU
94.4 %
heat output
low
heating
value
Northwest Manufacturing, Inc.
Flex-Fuel 60
(Woodmaster)
179,458 BTU/hr 80.0 %
high
heating
value
0.18 grams/hr/
91.0 %
10,000 BTU
heat output
6.6
continuous feed
low
heating
value
Heatmor
200 SSR II
66,842 BTU/hr 87.1 %
3.7
0.16
0.18
11.9
stick wood;
high
heating
grams/hr
lbs/million
lbs/million
grams/hr
batch load
BTU input
BTU output
value
0.07 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
99.9 %
heat output
7/15/2010 2:10 PM
List of Cleaner Hydronic Heaters | Burn Wise | US EPA
2 of 3
http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/owhhlist.html
low
heating
value
HeatSource1
Earth
Energy
87,577 BTU/hr 64.8 %
high
Series
190
heating
value
3.56
grams/hr
0.11
lbs/million
0.19
10.7
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
stick wood; batch
load
BTU input
output
2.49
0.11
0.20
grams/hr
lbs/million
BTU input
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
output
continuous feed
wood pellets;
0.06 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
74.4 %
heat output
low
heating
value
Northwest Manufacturing, Inc.
AFS
(Woodmaster)
900
107,069 BTU/hr
7.38
wood pellets;
0.27 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
heat output
Hardy Manufacturing Co., Inc.
KBP
270
120,000 BTU/hr 72.3 %
2.96
0.10
0.20
high
heating
grams/hr
lbs/million
BTU input
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
output
6.03
continuous feed
value
0.23 grams/hr/
wood pellets;
10,000 BTU
77.9 %
heat output
low
heating
value
Aqua-Therm
Kunzel
45,506 BTU/hr 75.8 %
0.7
0.10
0.21
PK-10
high
heating
grams/hr
lbs/million
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
0.89
BTU input
output
value
0.24 grams/hr/
0.17
lbs/million
0.26
17.4
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
5.6
0.16
0.27
17.1
stick wood;
grams/hr
lbs/million
lbs/million
grams/hr
batch load
BTU input
BTU output
8.4
0.18
0.27
18.0
stick wood; batch
grams/hr
lbs/million
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
continuous feed
10,000 BTU
86.7 %
low
heat output
heating
value
Silverwinds Metals
(Wood Doctor)
WDHE8000
112,655 BTU/hr 66.3 %
high
6.1
grams/hr
heating
value
0.09 grams/hr/
75.8 %
10,000 BTU
heat output
stick wood; batch
load
low
heating
value
Steel Tech Inc. (Heatmaster
G200
SS)
80,368 BTU/hr 68 %
high
heating
value
0.10 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
77 %
low
heat output
heating
value
Pro-Fab Industries Inc.
Empyre
66,290 BTU/hr 67.5 %
Pro
high
Series
heating
200
value
load
0.18 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
77. 2 %
low
heat output
heating
value
7/15/2010 2:10 PM
List of Cleaner Hydronic Heaters | Burn Wise | US EPA
3 of 3
Central Boiler
EClassic
1400
http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/owhhlist.html
107,459 BTU/hr 73.7 %
high
heating
value
5.5
grams/hr
0.19
lbs/million
0.27
8.5
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
BTU input
output
stick wood; batch
load
0.08 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
84.2 %
heat output
low
heating
value
Central Boiler
EClassic
2300
160,001 BTU/hr 74.9 %
6.4
0.20
0.31
high
heating
grams/hr
lbs/million
BTU input
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
output
17.6
stick wood; batch
load
value
0.06 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
85.7 %
heat output
0.20
lbs/million
0.31
13.6
lbs/million BTU grams/hr
stick wood; batch
load
BTU input
output
low
heating
value
Pro-Fab Industries Inc.
Empyre
Pro
Series
400
177,333 BTU/hr 78.9 %
high
heating
value
6.1
grams/hr
0.06 grams/hr/
10,000 BTU
90.2 %
low
heat output
heating
value
1 - Based on 8-hour test for stick wood models and 4-hour test for continuous feed models.
2 - EPA Phase 2 qualified level is 0.32 pounds of fine particles per million BTU of heat output (weighted average representing the range of burn rates expected in a year) and a maximum
individual test run of 18.0 grams per hour. Typically, the maximum individual test run is the maximum heat output burn rate.
Last updated on Thursday, July 08, 2010
7/15/2010 2:10 PM
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Appendix B Manufacturer Specifications for Selected Solar Energy Equipment B-1
130 WATT
off grid MODULE
You have many manufacturers to
choose from when considering solar
for your home or business. Partner
with us to see why Sharp is a global
leader in solar technology.
Engineering Excellence
Module offers industry-leading performance for
a variety of electrical power requirements.
DURABle
Designed and tested to withstand rigorous
weather conditions.
RELIABle
25-year limited warranty on power output.
High Performance
Solar cells have an advanced surface
texturing process to increase light absorption
and improve efficiency.
ND-130UJF
off grid 130 watt module
from the world’s trusted
source for solar.
Using breakthrough technology, made possible
by nearly 50 years of proprietary research and
development, Sharp’s ND-130UJF solar module
incorporates (36) 155 mm square solar cells with
an advanced surface texturing process to increase
light absorption and improve efficiency. Common
applications include cabins, solar power stations,
pumps, beacons, and lighting equipment.
Sharp off grid modules offer
industry-leading performance for
a variety of applications.
Solder-coated grid results in high
fill factor performance under low
light conditions.
sharp: The name to trust
When you choose Sharp, you get more than
well-engineered products. You also get Sharp’s
proven reliability, outstanding customer service and
the assurance of our 25-year limited warranty on
power output. A global leader in solar electricity,
Sharp powers more homes and businesses than
any other solar manufacturer worldwide.
be co m e p ow e r f u l
130 WATT
Nd-130UJf
ElEcTricAl cHArAcTErisTics
iV cUrVEs
Maximum Power (Pmax)*
130 W
Tolerance of Pmax
+10%/-5%
Type of Cell
Polycrystalline silicon
9
Cell Configuration
36 in series
8
Open Circuit Voltage (Voc)
21.9 V
7
Maximum Power Voltage (Vpm)
17.4 V
6
Short Circuit Current (Isc)
8.2 A
Maximum Power Current (Ipm)
7.5 A
Module Efficiency (%)
13.1%
Maximum System (DC) Voltage
600 V
Series Fuse Rating
15 A
2
NOCT
47.5°C
1
Temperature Coefficient (Pmax)
-0.485%/°C
0
Temperature Coefficient (Voc)
-0.36%/°C
Temperature Coefficient (lsc)
0.053%/°C
150
10
1000 [W/m2]
125
800 [W/m2]
600 [W/m2]
75
5
Power [W]
Current [A]
100
(6)
4
50
3
25
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
Current vs. Voltage
*Measured at (STC) Standard Test Conditions: 25°C, 1 kW/m2 insolation, AM 1.5
DimEnsions
mEcHAnicAl cHArAcTErisTics
Dimensions (A x B x C below)
26.1” x 59.0” x 1.8”/662 x 1499 x 46 mm
Type of Output Terminal
Junction
Box
10
Weight
30.9 lbs
/ 14.0 kg
9
Max Load
1000 [W/m ]
50 psf (2400
Pascals)
B AC K V i E W
150
A
SidE ViEW
2
d
125
8
E
800 [W/m2]
7
QUAlificATions
100
Fire Rating
Class C5
FM
NI CL1 4DIV2 GPS A, B, C, D
600 [W/m2]
75
f
Power [W]
6
UL 1703
Current [A]
UL Listed
B
50
3
wArrAnTY
f
2
25-year limited warranty on power output
1
Contact Sharp for complete warranty
information
0
0
5
10
25
15
20
25
E
0
d
Current vs. Voltage
g
A
26.1”/662 mm
Design and specifications are subject to change without notice.
Sharp is a registered trademark of Sharp Corporation. All other trademarks are property of their
respective owners. Contact Sharp to obtain the latest product manuals before using any Sharp
device. Cover photo: Solar installation by Direct Power and Water, Albuquerque, NM.
f
29.5”/750 mm
B
59.0”/1499 mm
C
C
1.8”/46 mm
d
9.8”/250 mm
g
24.4”/619 mm
Contact Sharp for tolerance specifications
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
5901 Bolsa Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
1-800-SOLAR-06 • Email: sharpsolar@sharpusa.com
www.sharpusa.com/solar
© 2008 Sharp Electronics Corporation. All rights reserved.
08L-033 • PC-11-08
E
16.2”/412 mm
235 WATT
multi-purpose MODULE
NEC 2008 Compliant
Sharp’s most powerful commercial
module manufactured today.
Engineering Excellence
High module efficiency for an outstanding balance
of size and weight to power and performance.
DURABle
Tempered glass, EVA lamination and
weatherproof backskin provide long-life and
enhanced cell performance.
RELIABle
25-year limited warranty on power output.
High Performance
This module uses an advanced surface
texturing process to increase light absorption
and improve efficiency.
innovative
156 mm monocrystalline solar cells provide high
power output. Ideal for large commercial rooftops
where space is a premium.
NU-U235F1
multi-purpose 235 watt
module from the world’s
trusted source for solar.
Using breakthrough technology, made possible
by nearly 50 years of proprietary research
and development, Sharp’s NU-235F1 solar
module incorporates an advanced surface
texturing process to increase light absorption
and improve efficiency. Common applications
include commercial and residential grid-tied
roof systems as well as ground mounted arrays.
Designed to withstand rigorous operating
conditions, this module offers high power
output per square foot of solar array.
The NU-U235F1 offers
industry-leading performance
for a variety of applications.
Improved Frame Technology
sharp: The name to trust
When you choose Sharp, you get more than
well-engineered products. You also get Sharp’s
proven reliability, outstanding customer service and
the assurance of our 25-year limited warranty on
power output. A global leader in solar electricity,
Sharp powers more homes and businesses than
any other solar manufacturer worldwide.
be co m e p ow e r f u l
235 watt
NU-U235F1
NeC 2008 Compliant
module output cables 12 AWG with locking connectors
ElEctricAl cHArActEristics
iv cUrvEs
Maximum Power (Pmax)*
235 W
Tolerance of Pmax
+10%/-5%
12
240
Monocrystalline silicon
11
220
Cell Configuration
10
60 in series
Open Circuit Voltage (Voc)
37.0 V
Maximum Power Voltage (Vpm)
30.0 V
Short Circuit Current (Isc)
8.60 A
Maximum Power Current (Ipm)
7.84 A
Module Efficiency (%)
200
1000
100
0 [W/m2
[W/m2
W/m2]]
9
180
8
160
800 [W/m2
[W/m2]
Current [A]
7
140
6
Power [W]
Type of Cell
120
600 [W/m2
[W/m2]
5
100
14.4%
4
80
Maximum System (DC) Voltage
600 V
3
60
Series Fuse Rating
15 A
2
40
NOCT
47.5°C
1
20
Temperature Coefficient (Pmax)
-0.485%/°C
0
Temperature Coefficient (Voc)
-0.351%/°C
Temperature Coefficient (lsc)
0.053%/°C
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Current vs. Voltage
V
*Measured at (STC) Standard Test Conditions: 25°C, 1 kW/m2 insolation, AM 1.5
DimEnsions
mEcHAnicAl cHArActEristics
Dimensions (A x B x C below)
39.1” x 64.6” x 1.8”/994 x 1640 x 46 mm
Cable Length (I)
43.3”/1100 mm
Output Interconnect Cable**
12 AWG with MC4 Locking Connector
220
Weight
44.110 lbs / 20.0 kg
200
Max Load
1000 [W/m2]
9
50 psf
(2400 Pascals)
180
Operating Temperature (cell)
-40 8to 194°F / -40 to 90°C
160
B AC K V i e W
240
12
11
**A safety lock clip (Multi Contact part number PV-SSH4) may be required in
readily accessible locations per NEC 2008 690.33 (C)
140
120
6
600 [W/m2]
5
100
Power [W]
Current [A]
i
F
800 [W/m2]
B
UL Listed
UL 1703
4
80
Fire Rating
Class C
3
60
2
40
1
20
wArrAntY
G
D
e
7
QUAlificAtions
siDe VieW
A
0
25-year limited warranty on power output
0
5
10
15
Contact Sharp for complete warranty information
F
0
20
25
30
35
e
40
G
Current vs. Voltage
Design and specifications are subject to change without notice.
Sharp is a registered trademark of Sharp Corporation. All other trademarks are property of
their respective owners. Contact Sharp to obtain the latest product manuals before using
any Sharp device. Cover photo: Solar Installation by SPG Solar.
D
H
A
39.1”/994 mm
F
32.3”/820 mm
B
64.6”/1640 mm
G
3.9”/100 mm
C
C
1.8”/46 mm
H
37.7”/958 mm
D
7.9”/200 mm
i
43.3”/1100 mm
Contact Sharp for tolerance specifications
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
5901 Bolsa Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
1-800-SOLAR-06 • Email: sharpsolar@sharpusa.com
www.sharpusa.com/solar
© 2009 Sharp Electronics Corporation. All rights reserved.
09F-040 • PC-06-09
e
14.4”/365 mm
PowerGate® Plus 30 kW
PVS-30 (208 V)
PVS-30 (240 V)
PVS-30 (480 V)
PV Inverters | PowerGate® Plus 30 kW
Unparalleled Performance
With their advanced system
intelligence, next-generation Edge™
MPPT technology, and industrial-grade
engineering, PowerGate Plus inverters
maximize system uptime and power
production, even in cloudy conditions.
Power Efficiency
Power Level Output Power1
1
Efficiency 2
10%
3 kW
88.2%
20%
6 kW
93.8%
30%
9 kW
95.0%
PowerGate Plus 30 kW Specifications
UL/CSA
50%
15 kW
96.0%
Input Parameters
75%
22.5 kW
95.8%
Maximum Array Input Voltage
600 VDC

100%
30 kW
95.6%
Input Voltage Range (MPPT; Full Power)
305–600 VDC

Maximum Input Current
104 ADC

305V minimum
2
240V model
Edge MPPT
Output Parameters
Output Voltage Range (L-L)
Provides rapid and accurate control
that boosts PV plant kilowatt yield
Provides a wide range of operation
across all photovoltaic cell technologies
Nominal Output Voltage
Conformal coated to withstand extreme
humidity and air-pollution levels
Proven Reliability
208 VAC

211–264 VAC
240 VAC

422–528 VAC
480 VAC

208 VAC

240 VAC

480 VAC

Output Frequency Range
59.3–60.5 Hz

AC Voltage Range (Standard)
-12%/+10%

Nominal Output Frequency
60 Hz

Number of Phases
3

Maximum Output Current per Phase
84A
208 VAC

72A
240 VAC

36A
480 VAC

Printed Circuit Board Durability
Wide thermal operating range: -40º C
(-40º F) to 85º C (185º F)
183–229 VAC
Rugged and reliable, PowerGate Plus
PV inverters are engineered from the
ground up to meet the demands of
large-scale installations.
CEC-Weighted Efficiency
95%

Low Maintenance
Maximum Continuous Output Power
30 kW (30 kVA)

Tare Losses
75.62 W
208 VAC

64.58 W
240 VAC

72.3 W
480 VAC

Modular components make service efficient
Safety
UBC Seismic Zone 4 compliant
Power Factor at Full Load
>0.99

Built-in DC and AC disconnect switches
Harmonic Distortion
<3% THD

Integrated DC two-pole disconnect
switch isolates the inverter (with the
exception of the GFDI circuit) from the
photovoltaic power system to allow
inspection and maintenance
Temperature
Operating Ambient Temperature Range (Full Power)
-20º C to +50º C

Storage Temperature Range
-30º C to +70º C

Cooling
Forced Air

Built-in isolation transformer

Protective covers over exposed power
connections
Standard
o
Optional
PowerGate® Plus 30 kW
PowerGate Plus 30 kW Specifications
UL/CSA
Noise
Noise Level
<65 dB(A)

4 (50 ADC)
o
5 (40 ADC)
o
Enclosure Rating
NEMA 3R

Enclosure Finish
(14-Gauge, Powder-Coated G90 Steel)
RAL-7032

Combiner
Number of Inputs and Fuse Rating
Inverter Cabinet
Output Options
Cabinet Dimensions (Height x Width x Depth)
PowerGate Plus 30 kW
UL/CSA
74" x 30" x 26.875"
Cabinet Weight
208 VAC Output
1,204 lbs.
Transformer
240 VAC Output
Integrated Internal Transformer
480 VAC Output

1
Low Tap Voltage
20%

Testing and Certification
Streamlined Design
With all components encased in
a single, space-saving enclosure,
PowerGate Plus PV inverters are easy
to install, operate, and maintain.
UL1741, CSA 107.1-01, IEEE 1547, IEEE C62.41.2, IEEE C62.45, IEEE
C37.90.1, IEEE C37.90.2

UBC Zone 4 Seismic Rating

Warranty
Single Cabinet with Small Footprint
Convenient access to all components
Large in-floor cable glands make access to DC and AC cables easy
Five Years

Extended Warranty (up to 10, 15, or 20 years)
o
Extended Service Agreement
o
Intelligent Monitoring
Satcon PV View® Plus
o
Rugged Construction
Satcon PV Zone
o
Engineered for outdoor environments
Third-Party Compatibility

Output Transformer

Standard
o
Optional
Provides galvanic isolation
1
The 20% boost tap on the isolation transformer increases the AC voltage output range for
applications where the solar array DC operating voltage is at or near the lower end of the DC input
range. This boost allows for continued inverter operation at lower DC voltage input levels.
Note: Specifications are subject to change.
Matches the output voltage of the PV
inverter to the grid
©2010 Satcon Technology Corporation. All rights
reserved. Satcon, Satcon S-Type, and PV View are
registered trademarks, and Edge is a trademark, of
Satcon Technology Corporation. 1/10
Satcon Corporate
Satcon West
Satcon Canada
Satcon Greece
Satcon Czech Republic
Satcon Shenzhen China
Satcon Shanghai China
27 Drydock Avenue
2925 Bayview Drive
835 Harrington Court
Athanasiou Diakou 2 &
Classic 7 Business Park
Room 1112, 11/F, International
Room 2308, 23/F, New
Boston, MA 02210
Fremont, CA 94538
Burlington, ON L7N 3P3
Marathonas Ave
Jankovcova 1037/49
Chamber of Commerce,
HongQiao Center Building,
P: 617.897.2400
P: 510.226.3800
Canada
Gerakas 15344
170 00 Praha 7
No. 168 FuHua San Road,
No. 83 LouGuanShan Road,
F: 617.897.2401
F: 510.226.3801
P: 905.639.4692
Greece
Czech Republic
FuTian District, Shenzhen, P.R.C.
Changning District,
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
F: 905.639.0961
P: 30 210 6654424
P: 420 255 729 610
518048
Shanghai, P.R.C.
E: sales@satcon.com
F: 30 210 6654425
F: 420 255 729 611
P: +86 755 61682588
P: 139.1811.2818
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
F: +86 755 61682599
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
PowerGate® Plus 50 kW
PVS-50 (208 V)
PVS-50 (240 V )
PV Inverters | PowerGate® Plus 50 kW
PVS-50 (480 V)
Unparalleled Performance
With their advanced system
intelligence, next-generation Edge™
MPPT technology, and industrial-grade
engineering, PowerGate Plus inverters
maximize system uptime and power
production, even in cloudy conditions.
Power Efficiency
Power Level Output Power1
1
Efficiency 2
10%
5 kW
90.5%
20%
10 kW
95.0%
30%
15 kW
95.9%
50%
25 kW
96.3%
75%
37.5 kW
96.4%
100%
50 kW
96.0%
305V minimum
2
480V model
Edge MPPT
PowerGate Plus 50 kW Specifications
Input Parameters
Maximum Array Input Voltage
600 VDC

Input Voltage Range (MPPT; Full Power)
305–600 VDC

Maximum Input Current
172 ADC

Output Parameters
Output Voltage Range (L-L)
Provides rapid and accurate control
that boosts PV plant kilowatt yield
Provides a wide range of operation
across all photovoltaic cell technologies
UL/CSA
Nominal Output Voltage
Printed Circuit Board Durability
183–229 VAC
208 VAC

211–264 VAC
240 VAC

422–528 VAC
480 VAC

208 VAC

240 VAC

480 VAC

Wide thermal operating range: -40º C
(-40º F) to 85º C (185º F)
Output Frequency Range
59.3–60.5 Hz

AC Voltage Range (Standard)
-12%/+10%

Conformal coated to withstand extreme humidity and air-pollution levels
Nominal Output Frequency
60 Hz

Number of Phases
3

Maximum Output Current per Phase
139A
208 VAC

121A
240 VAC

60A
480 VAC

Proven Reliability
Rugged and reliable, PowerGate Plus
PV inverters are engineered from the
ground up to meet the demands of
large-scale installations.
Low Maintenance
CEC-Weighted Efficiency
95.5%

Maximum Continuous Output Power
50 kW (50 kVA)

Tare Losses
75.48 W
208 VAC

93.97 W
240 VAC

76.48 W
480 VAC

Modular components make service efficient
Safety
UBC Seismic Zone 4 compliant
Built-in DC and AC disconnect switches
Integrated DC two-pole disconnect
switch isolates the inverter (with the
exception of the GFDI circuit) from the
photovoltaic power system to allow
inspection and maintenance
Power Factor at Full Load
>0.99

Harmonic Distortion
<3% THD

Temperature
Operating Ambient Temperature Range (Full
Power)
-20º C to +50º C
Storage Temperature Range
-30º C to +70º C

Cooling
Forced Air

Built-in isolation transformer
Protective covers over exposed power
connections

Standard
o
Optional

PowerGate® Plus 50 kW
PowerGate Plus 50 kW Specifications
UL/CSA
Noise
Noise Level
<65 dB(A)

4 (80 ADC)
o
5 (63 ADC)
o
Enclosure Rating
NEMA 3R

Output Options
Enclosure Finish
(14-Gauge, Powder-Coated G90 Steel)
RAL-7032

PowerGate Plus 50 kW
Cabinet Dimensions (Height x Width x Depth)
UL/CSA
208 VAC Output
Cabinet Weight
240 VAC Output
Transformer
Combiner
Number of Inputs and Fuse Rating
Inverter Cabinet
74" x 45" x 26.875"
1,732 lbs.
Integrated Internal Transformer
480 VAC Output

1
Low Tap Voltage
20%

Testing and Certification
Streamlined Design
With all components encased in
a single, space-saving enclosure,
PowerGate Plus PV inverters are easy
to install, operate, and maintain.
UL1741, CSA 107.1-01, IEEE 1547, IEEE C62.41.2, IEEE C62.45, IEEE
C37.90.1, IEEE C37.90.2

UBC Zone 4 Seismic Rating

Warranty
Single Cabinet with Small Footprint
Convenient access to all components
Large in-floor cable glands make access to DC and AC cables easy
Five Years

Extended Warranty (up to 10, 15, or 20 years)
o
Extended Service Agreement
o
Intelligent Monitoring
Satcon PV View® Plus
o
Rugged Construction
Satcon PV Zone
o
Engineered for outdoor environments
Third-Party Compatibility

Output Transformer
Provides galvanic isolation

Standard
o
Optional
1
Matches the output voltage of the PV
inverter to the grid
The 20% boost tap on the isolation transformer increases the AC voltage output range for
applications where the solar array DC operating voltage is at or near the lower end of the DC input
range. This boost allows for continued inverter operation at lower DC voltage input levels.
Note: Specifications are subject to change.
©2010 Satcon Technology Corporation. All rights
reserved. Satcon, Satcon S-Type, and PV View are
registered trademarks, and Edge is a trademark, of
Satcon Technology Corporation. 1/10
Satcon Corporate
Satcon West
Satcon Canada
Satcon Greece
Satcon Czech Republic
Satcon Shenzhen China
Satcon Shanghai China
27 Drydock Avenue
2925 Bayview Drive
835 Harrington Court
Athanasiou Diakou 2 &
Classic 7 Business Park
Room 1112, 11/F, International
Room 2308, 23/F, New
Boston, MA 02210
Fremont, CA 94538
Burlington, ON L7N 3P3
Marathonas Ave
Jankovcova 1037/49
Chamber of Commerce,
HongQiao Center Building,
P: 617.897.2400
P: 510.226.3800
Canada
Gerakas 15344
170 00 Praha 7
No. 168 FuHua San Road,
No. 83 LouGuanShan Road,
F: 617.897.2401
F: 510.226.3801
P: 905.639.4692
Greece
Czech Republic
FuTian District, Shenzhen, P.R.C.
Changning District,
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
F: 905.639.0961
P: 30 210 6654424
P: 420 255 729 610
518048
Shanghai, P.R.C.
E: sales@satcon.com
F: 30 210 6654425
F: 420 255 729 611
P: +86 755 61682588
P: 139.1811.2818
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
F: +86 755 61682599
E: sales@satcon.com
E: sales@satcon.com
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Appendix C Preliminary Drawings for Selected PV Arrays C-1
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Almanor – Detailed Analysis PV System C-2
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Chester Air Attack Base – Detailed Analysis PV System C-3
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Supervisor’s Office – Detailed Analysis PV System C-4
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Eagle Lake – Detailed Analysis PV System C-5
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Bogard – Detailed Analysis PV System C-6
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Hat Creek – Detailed Analysis PV System C-7
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Appendix D Additional Information for Central Boiler Biomass Heating System D-1
FROM :Plumas Hedical Services
FRX HO. :5302841795
Jul. 29 2010 08: 15RM
Quote Print
INDIAN VAIJ.ev·lUMBER CO
162 GENESEE RO
TAYLORSVILLE. CA 95983-9129
R&fer8nce:
PkoM: 53().284-{3559
Fax:
Pi
All SCHMIDT
Quote Date: 7/2912010
Print Date:.
712912010
530-2&4·1971
Cuatomer Information
Name:
ALI SCHMIDT
Address:
Email:
Day Phone:
Evening Phone:
eCL-24oo..331R ECl24llO-1GNITION READY CHARCQtWBRONZE
111
1330
HEAT EXCHANGER COIL (22QK BTU)
PEl( ADAPTER. 1" PEl( X314"UIP
173
PUN~.TACOOO9,tt&VA!lGtt
198;
1\IRASS.8AU. YM.lE. 3'14"~
HOSE at8. 3/4"
199
,.,
29&
2fII
29Q
300
_
5I!J1i
5928
1650
2441
tQT,Fn'TtNGS FOR PIN 591
BRMSSWtNStHEekVAlVE,:W" flP
~ 6.&UJS.
aschmldt@antares.org
707-023-1562
301.73M904
$JusanG!)
'I
$11."110
$411.26
$3.64
$171.20
• •'
$1.23
1
..
1
2
1
t
$411.26
$$7..9 7
,,0;
_22
ASH SHOVEl.
ASH RAKE
$28.48
~E
~a.
. SIDE ARM~T ~R. aw FtP
PEX • 1" CLAMP
1f.ISOXl1olHI8tTOR PlUS
THERMOPEX, r't 100' Rl
$1$.31)
't
t
1
1
,
$1&7.17
1.
$0.98
8
139.07
2
$1.146.00
1
..... ,~
. ··•··.· .....tll
. . Uft'....,....
$1".16
$ffi.2.0
$17.M
$7.23
,1';7.91
$6,01
12&Zl
$26.49
$46.lO
$23..49
$1"J$l
$1.1)4
$78.'4
$1,146.00
. -$400.00
$13,621,82
$1,115.55
L.biw
$280.00
',DeJ1rifJ
$756.00
~T••
$15-.f$f$7.37
Outdoor Wood Gasification Furnace
The E-Classic 2400’s three-stage combustion technology utilizes wood gasification to achieve extremely low emissions. This process burns the wood so completely that combustion efficiencies approach 100%. The Xtract™ heat exchanger optimizes the transfer of heat from the extremely hot gases to the water, making the E-Classic 2400 one
of the cleanest and most efficient ways to heat with wood. Utilizing biomass fuel, the E-Classic 2400 can provide a comfortable, even heat to multiple
buildings and workshops. It can also heat water and replace multiple indoor wood stoves.
Burning wood, a totally renewable resource, can significantly reduce your carbon footprint
compared to heating with nonrenewable fuels.
E-Classic 2400 Features & Benefits
FireStar™ Electronic Controller – Provides user with easy operation of the furnace with just the touch of a button. The controller automatically adjusts the primary and secondary air which optimizes the gasification process allowing the furnace to be more efficient and
cleaner burning.
Fusion® Combustor – Super-heated air is injected and mixed with the hot gases from the primary firebox and starts the secondary combustion process. No catalytic device needed.
Large Reaction Chamber™ – Final combustion occurs in the Reaction Chamber where
extremely high temperatures aid in complete combustion. The Reaction Chamber features a large, hinged door for easy ash removal.
Patent
Pending
Specifications
E-Classic 2400 Model
Door . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.5"L x 28.25"
Firebox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36"L x 43.5"H x 26"W Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,925 lbs.
Water Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340 Gallons
8-Hour Output Rating . . . . . . . . . .186,453 Btu/hr**
Maximum Output . . . . . . . . . . . . .260,486 Btu/hr**
Emission Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 g/hr**
Heat Output Emission Level . . 0.12 lb/Million Btu**
**Based on EPA qualifying test.
Assisted Power Ignition – The furnace can be fitted with an optional natural gas or
propane burner which allows for push-button automatic gas-fired wood ignition. This provides easy starting and automatic relighting of the fire if needed.
Urethane Foam Insulation – Insulation is sprayed on and forms a 100% airtight, waterproof seal around the water jacket.
Triple Insulated Firebox Door – Ergonomically designed door is lockable and features a large opening for easy loading. Door is triple insulated for maximum efficiency. The specially designed Cam Loc® door closure provides a tight seal each time the door is closed.
Rear Access Panel – Designed for convenient installation and easy access to pumps and
power disconnect. Up to three pumps can be installed. Insulated Chimney – Two 4-foot, insulated chimney sections are supplied. Additional sections are available for extending the chimney when needed.
Photo Electronic Controlled LED Lights – The new long-lasting, energy-efficient LED
night lights save money and enhance safety. They illuminate the inside of the firebox and
the front and sides of the outdoor furnace and can be conveniently set to automatically turn
on at night.
Based on EPA output ratings. Actual Btu output and burn time
will be affected by the type of wood burned, its moisture content
and other factors.
Foundation Dimensions
Furnace must be installed on a noncombustible surface or foundation that incorporates an enclosure
that will prevent supply and return lines from any possible exposure to sunlight, fire, rodents or physical
damage that may be caused by an occurrence outside
the furnace enclosure.
Must be installed in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations.
Your Central Boiler dealer can assist you in determining the actual heat and hot water needs for your home and the criteria for proper installation of the system. For the maximum performance and life of your furnace, always
insist on using Central Boiler authorized system parts and accessories. See Owner's Manual for proper chimney height and installation. Minimum chimney height is determined by proximity to other buildings. Consider location and direction smoke may travel with prevailing winds before installing your furnace.
Content of this brochure is from information in possession of Central Boiler at the time of the design of this publication. Product specifications and appearance subject to change without notice.
*Central Boiler, Inc. is not a tax advisor. Taxpayers claiming a tax credit should consult a tax professional with any questions. Central Boiler is not responsible or liable for the taxpayer's ability to receive tax credits.
© 2010 Central Boiler
•
® ™ Trademarks of Central Boiler, Inc.
• Printed in the USA 2/10
•
p/n 2881
Click to go to centralboiler.com
January 2010
C - 110
©
© 2010
2009 Central
Central Boiler
Boiler
Click to go to centralboiler.com
May 2010
© 2010 Central Boiler
Welcome to Central Boiler
Central Boiler was established in 1984 and is North
America's largest manufacturer of outdoor wood
furnaces. We make it our goal to provide our customers
with the finest outdoor wood furnaces available
anywhere. For you as a consumer, wood heat offers
many advantages. Wood is renewable, inexpensive,
carbon neutral and often free. Conventional sources of
heat such as propane, natural gas, fuel oil and
electricity deplete our irreplaceable fossil fuels. They
are also subject to constant price fluctuations. The
E-Classic outdoor wood gasification furnace
provides a heat source free of foreign nation
influence and “the grip of big oil.” It takes the ageold idea of heating with wood and modernizes it.
By keeping the fire outside the home, the E-Classic
eliminates the dangers and mess associated with
traditional indoor wood stoves. The E-Classic uses
a three-stage combustion process to burn wood so
completely that combustion efficiencies approach
100%. With the patent-pending, self-cleaning heat
exchanger, the E-Classic produces extremely low
emissions per Btu of heat delivered and is one of the
cleanest ways to heat with wood. Our E-Classic
offers you an alternative that will save you money.
This brochure will provide answers to questions you
may have about our clean, efficient approach to wood
heat. Please browse through this brochure to learn how
you can benefit from an E-Classic outdoor wood
gasification furnace for your home or business.
E-Classic
Model 2300
The E-Classic Can Work for You.
The E-Classic outdoor wood gasification furnace is located
outside, typically 30 to 50 feet (but as far as 500 feet) away from
your home or business, and works with any existing heating
system. A water jacket surrounds the furnace firebox and heat
exchanger and heated water is circulated to the home or building
through insulated underground pipes. Water-to-air or water-towater heat exchangers or direct circulation conveys the heat into
the structure’s forced-air furnace, boiler or radiant floor heating
system. This allows for normal thermostatic control for safe, even,
clean and comfortable heat. The ability to heat multiple buildings
and water can eliminate your heating bills. Outside burning
removes the threat of devastating chimney fires, dangerous carbon
monoxide or oxygen depletion which affects your indoor air
quality. It also eliminates the smoke, ashes, odors and soot
buildup on walls and ceilings inside your home that indoor
burning creates.
Contents
System Illustration
Welcome
System Installation View Forced Air Illustration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2, 3
Features & Specifications
Cutaway View
FireStar Controller
Rear Access Panel
Firebox Door . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4, 5
Comparison Chart
EPA Phase 2 Hangtag
How Btu Output Affects Burn Time Chart
Specifications
Foundation Dimensions
How Combustion Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6, 7
Parts and Accessories
Sample Parts List
ThermoPEX® Insulated Pipe . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9
Illustrations
Single Zone 8-Loop with Water Heater
Wall, Kickspace and Panel Heaters . . . . . 10
Forced Air vs. Radiant In-Floor Chart
Radiant Heat-Multi Zone In-Floor . . . . . . . 11
Pools/Hot Tubs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Forced Air System with Heat Exchanger
For a closer look at other heating applications, refer to pages 10-15.
Greenhouse/Suspended Space Heater
Multiple Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Baseboard/Forced Air
In-Floor Radiant/Forced Air . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Existing Boiler Directly Plumbed
Existing Boiler Pressurized . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Central Boiler E-Classic
General Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Fusion® Combustor - The wood is gasified in the primary combustion firebox and these gases enter the Fusion Combustor
where super-heated air is injected and mixed with the hot gases and the secondary combustion process starts.
Reaction Chamber™ - Final combustion occurs in the Reaction
Chamber where extremely high temperatures aid in complete combustion. Any remaining ash can easily be removed through the Reaction Chamber door.
Push Button Automatic Gas-fired Wood Ignition - (Dual Fuel models) Provides an easy start and ensures you will never need to light another fire.
Backup Dual Fuel System - (Dual Fuel models) Can automatically
provide heat with a gas backup burner if the operator does not refuel the furnace with wood.
EPA Hangtag - The E-Classic 2300 is U.S. EPA Phase 2 Hydronic
Heater Program qualified.
Urethane Foam Insulation - Insulation is sprayed on and forms a 100% airtight, waterproof seal around the water jacket. Insulation
allows the water to hold its temperature longer, which means less
wood consumption. This is the same type of insulation that is used on high efficiency water heaters.
High Capacity Water Jacket - Provides a balance between firebox
volume and water capacity for optimum performance and safety.
Continues to supply heat after the wood load is depleted.
Insulated Chimney - Two 4-foot stainless steel chimney sections for wood burning appliances are supplied. Additional sections available for extending chimney when needed.
All-Weather Steel Siding - All siding is overlapped for tighter weather seal. All panels and corners are powder coated for high durability.
Bypass Door - Redirects exhaust when refueling.
Photo Electronic Controlled Night Light - Light can be set to automatically turn on at night. Provides nighttime visibility for additional operator safety.
Patent Pending
Neutral color combination to
compliment your landscape
Safety tested and listed
Color selections are close representations
but are limited due to print variations.
FireStar controller for E-Classic 2300
Xtract™ Heat Transfer System Transfers the heat from the exhaust to the water during the final combustion
phase and before the exhaust exits the chimney.
FireStar™
Electronic Controller
The FireStar electronic controller
optimizes the burn, saves wood and
provides the user with easy operation
of the furnace with just the touch of
a button. The controller features a large
easy-to-read digital display. The Dual
Fuel model's automatic gas-fired wood
ignition ensures you will never need to
start another fire. It automatically
relights the wood if the fire goes out
after an extended shut down period.
The Dual Fuel model has two gas
burners, one in the firebox that provides
a small controlled gas flame to light the
wood and one in the Reaction Chamber
to provide heat for continued operation
if the furnace is not refueled with wood.
FireStar controller for E-Classic 2300 Dual Fuel model
Rear Access Panel
Central Boiler designed to the E-Classic
for convenient installations. The
E-Classic is plumbed for up to three
pumps. The rear access panel can be
easily removed and provides convenient
access to the power disconnect, draft
fan, pumps and optional Backup Dual
Fuel System. The access panel can be
locked for safety and security.
Triple Insulated Lockable Firebox Door
Specifications and design may
change without
notice. Talk to
your local dealer
about proper furnace sizing.
Central Boiler engineers all of its
outdoor furnace doors with special
attention to fit, function and ease of use.
They are constructed from high quality
materials and are built to last. The
E-Classic features a lockable firebox
door that is stylish, ergonomically
designed and features a large opening
for easy loading. The heavy-duty door
handle is durable and easy to use. The
door is triple insulated to hold the heat
in the furnace for maximum efficiency.
All parts are powder coated for high
durability. The E-Classic's Cam Loc®
door closure ensures a tight seal each
time the door is closed.
Most Powerful and Best Performing EPA Qualified Outdoor Wood Gasification Furnace Specifications
This information was derived from data available from the EPA List of Cleaner
Outdoor Wood-fired Hydronic Heaters at the time of printing.
E-Classic 2300 Model
Door . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23" x 29"
Firebox . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36"L x 30"W x 41"H
Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,900 lbs.
Water Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450 Gallons
Designed to burn fully seasoned wood.
E-Classic 2300 Dual Fuel Model
Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,000 lbs.
Gas Backup Burner . . . . . . . . . . . . 175,000 Btu
Gas-fired Wood Ignition Burner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,000 Btu
EPA Hangtag
The E-Classic 2300 is U.S. EPA Phase 2
Hydronic Heater Program qualified.
Foundation Dimensions
Furnace must be installed on a noncombustible
surface or foundation that incorporates an enclosure that will prevent supply and return
lines from any possible exposure to sunlight,
fire, rodents or physical damage that may be
caused by an occurrence outside the furnace
enclosure.
Must be installed in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations.
Based on EPA output ratings. Actual Btu output and burn time will
be affected by the type of wood burned, its moisture content and
other factors.
How wood burns - stages of combustion
For wood heating appliances, adding too much oxygen can cause wood to burn too rapidly and uncontrollably, leading to higher emission rates and lower efficiency. By delivering
oxygen in the proper amount at the right time in the combustion process, the E-Classic
achieves a controlled combustion that delivers high heat output and low emissions.
Stage 1 As wood begins to burn, the initial heat is used to drive the moisture out of the
wood resulting in steam exiting the chimney. This is heat that would otherwise be used to
heat the water in the furnace. Properly seasoned wood (with a moisture content of 15% to
25%) burns better and gives off more heat.
Stage 2 The second stage of combustion is the heat-producing stage. During this stage,
two processes occur as temperatures reach different levels. The process by which gases are
released from wood and burned is called primary combustion. Primary combustion releases
a large amount of energy but also releases large amounts of unburned combustible gases.
These gases, called secondary gases, contain up to 60 percent of the potential heat in the
wood so their combustion is important to achieve high overall combustion efficiency. In order
for these gases to burn, sufficient oxygen and high temperatures are needed. The air supply
is critical. Too little air will not support combustion and too much will cool the temperature to
a point where combustion cannot occur. The E-Classic's design optimizes secondary combustion to maximize heat output.
Stage 3 After gases are driven from the wood and burned, the substance that remains is charcoal. Charcoal burns for a long time, releasing additional heat and providing a way to rekindle wood when it is added.
The combustion process begins in
the primary burn area where the
wood is loaded and ignited. When
the temperature controller calls for
heat, air is injected into the firebox
and the fire becomes more intense.
Because the firebox is sealed, the
hot gases are forced downward into
the Fusion® Combustor.
In the Fusion Combustor,
super-heated air is injected
into the already hot gases and results in an extremely
hot flame. The downward draft forces this intense flame into the Reaction
Chamber™. Heat is transferred from the heat
exchanger and into the water
supply as it travels upward toward
the exhaust area. The extreme temperatures achieved in the Reaction Chamber result in final combustion of the gases and combustion
efficiencies that approach 100%. One of
the benefits of the extremely high burn
temperatures is reduced emissions.
A complete line of parts and accessories
For the maximum performance and life of your furnace, always insist on using Central Boiler
authorized system parts and accessories.
There is no need to chase from here to there for your parts, accessories and maintenance tools.
Central Boiler has them all. Central Boiler has thousands of square feet of space dedicated to
inventory which our dealer network may access. Overnight, second day, three day, and ground
delivery are available to our dealers six days a week.
To locate your nearest Central Boiler dealer, either visit our website at CentralBoiler.com and use
the dealer locator or call 1-800-248-4681.
Sample Parts List For Forced Air Heating System
Qty
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
8
*
1
1
3
1
1
p/n
107
2053
591
171
224
190
118
198
1330
5978
396
296
1650
297
6593
Description
125,000 Btu Heat Exchanger Coil
Domestic Water Heater Fittings Kit
Domestic Water Heat Exchanger
Circulation Pump
Isolation Flange Kit, 3/4"
24 V Thermostat
3/4" Close Nipple
3/4" Ball Valve
3/4" MPT x 1" Pex Adapter
1" Stainless Steel Clamp
ThermoPEX ® Insulated Pipe
Spark Arrestor (Optional)
Check Valve
1650XL Inhibitor Plus
Ashtrol
Ground Rod Kit
Illustration for forced air heating system is located on page 3.
* Installation distance to the outdoor furnace will determine the quantities. Consult dealer on insulation options available.
ThermoPEX® Insulated Piping System
ThermoPEX is a flexible pre-insulated piping system that saves energy and maximizes the
efficiency of your outdoor wood furnace. ThermoPEX consists of two 1-inch oxygen barrier
Central PEX® pipes or two 1-1/4 inch oxygen barrier PEX pipes (supply and return) that are
insulated with high-density urethane insulation and a thick, durable, waterproof, UV-protected
polyethylene outer jacket. The corrugated design allows flexing for easier installation.
ThermoPEX is the best insulated piping system available for your outdoor wood furnace.
Pipe
Oxygen barrier Central PEX is a high-density, cross-link pipe, rated
for 180 degrees F at 100 psi. It is compatible with standard PEX
insert fittings which cost much less than competitors' compression
fittings. PEX pipes are marked to easily identify supply and return
lines.
Insulation
The high-density urethane insulation provides the ultimate control
against heat loss. The high thermal efficiency of the urethane allows
for a smaller overall size than some competitors, and provides lower
heat losses per foot. The special proprietary formulation of the high
density urethane insulation used in ThermoPEX provides ultimate
control against heat loss.
Outer Jacket
The ThermoPEX high-density polyethylene outer jacket is thick,
durable and seamless. It provides the necessary protection and is
waterproof. It is corrugated for flexibility and can be easily routed
around obstacles. It is also UV protected and can be installed above
ground. It eliminates concerns with ground moisture or water
affecting insulating properties of the urethane insulation.
ThermoPEX® insulated pipe can also be used above ground for quick,
temporary winter installs.
For illustration purposes only.
Radiant Heat
Single Zone 8-Loop with Water Heater
Select Steel Panel Radiators
Will keep most any room comfortable and in style.
Kickspace Hydronic Heaters
Designed to fit under cabinets or in other spaces.
Fan Forced Hydronic Heaters
All-Around Comfort that's Quick and Easy to Control.
A perfect solution to warm up those cold spots in your
home. Whether it is your entry, kitchen or patio door
area these radiators and fan forced hydronic heaters
will provide comfort that's efficient, quick and easy to
control. They are quiet, elegant, stylish, and designed
to blend in, making the best possible use of space.
Multi Zone In-Floor Installation with Snow Melting Loop
Central Boiler outdoor wood furnaces can be used in a variety
of heating applications.
Pool/Hot Tub Application
Greenhouse Heating Options
Suspended Space Heater
Heat Multiple Buildings
Forced Air System
Suspended Space Heater
Dual Heat System
Baseboard / Forced Air
Dual Heat System
In Floor Radiant / Forced Air
Existing Boiler
Direct Plumbed
Existing Boiler
Pressurized
Testimonial“This was the best decision we’ve
ever made! Our house is cleaner and
we absolutely love the comfortable,
even heat in our home. The endless
supply of free hot water is a bonus
we weren’t even expecting. But probably the most surprising thing is that this outdoor wood furnace is
so efficient that it heats our entire
home and hot water with less wood
than our indoor stove”
Carl H., Minnesota
Why You Should Choose The E-Classic by Central Boiler
It’s the alternative that eliminates the negative effects of burning wood
indoors and increases the advantages of wood heat. It’s a choice
that can improve your family’s living environment and standard of
living while eliminating the fire hazards and time-consuming chore of
tending a traditional wood stove. The Central Boiler E-Classic 2300
outdoor wood gasification furnace can provide 100% of the heat and
hot water for a typical home. Your Central Boiler dealer can assist you
in determining the actual heat and hot water needs for your home and
the criteria for proper installation of the system. Actual Btu output
and burn time will be affected by the type of wood burned, its moisture
content and other factors. By virtually eliminating your heating costs,
the E-Classic can often pay for itself in the first two years of use.
Over a ten year period, a homeowner or business may save $20,000
to $100,000 or more in heating costs. The E-Classic uses 25% to 70%
less wood compared to traditional wood furnaces or other brands of
outdoor wood furnaces. The E-Classic saves you time and means less
work because it burns larger pieces of wood. There’s less splitting
which significantly reduces the time you spend preparing the wood.
The large firebox is designed for easy loading of wood.
20502 160th Street • Greenbush, MN 56726
(800) 248-4681 or (218) 782-2575
CentralBoiler.com
© 2009 Central Boiler
® ™ Trademarks of Central Boiler, Inc.
Printed in the United States 8/09
For the maximum performance and life of your furnace,
always insist on using Central Boiler authorized system
parts and accessories.
See Owner's Manual for proper chimney height and installation. Minimum chimney height is determined by proximity to other buildings. Consider location and direction
smoke may travel with prevailing winds before installing
your furnace.
Content of this brochure is information in possession of
Central Boiler at the time of the design of this publication
and may not represent what was previously manufactured.
Product specifications and appearance subject to change.
*Central Boiler, Inc. is not a tax advisor. Taxpayers claiming a tax credit should consult a tax professional with any questions. Central Boiler is not responsible or liable for the taxpayer's ability to receive tax credits.
Ask your dealer about Outdoor Furnace Best Burn Practices.
p/n 2536
Qualified Individuals Working Together for a Common Purpose: A High Quality Finished Product
Central Boiler is located in Greenbush, Minnesota and was
established in 1984 and is North America's largest manufacturer of
quality outdoor wood furnaces. Based upon a desire to create safer
and more efficient heating products, the company’s innovations and
patents have established Central Boiler as a leader in product
quality. The uncompromising attitude to manufacture the best and
always strive to make it better is at the core of the company’s
growth. Central Boiler has a dealer network that has now
established itself throughout the United States and Canada.
Authorized Central Boiler Dealers located across the U.S. and Canada
When you’re looking for a wood heating system for any need,
your Central Boiler dealer is there to serve you. Your Central
Boiler dealer can answer your questions, provide you with
literature about the E-Classic outdoor wood gasification furnace
and help you choose the model right for your heating needs.
To locate a Central Boiler dealer in your area, visit the dealer
locator at CentralBoiler.com.
Free 25 Year Limited Warranty
A free 25 year limited warranty is available on the E-Classic
if registered at the time of purchase. Central Boiler leads the
industry with its commitment to stand behind its outdoor wood
furnaces.
See Warranty Registration form for details.
Using wood as a heating fuel is endorsed by the U.S. Forestry Service.
Yo u r A u t h o r i z e d C e n t r a l B o i l e r D e a l e r
USFS Renewable Energy Feasibility Study Final Report Appendix E Detailed Economic Analysis Results D-1
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Almanor Boneyard.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:41:37 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Almanor - Boneyard
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$379,800
-$379,800
$252,379
$0
$252,379
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$8,525
-$12,961
$21,486
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$260,904
-$12,961
$273,865
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$260,904
$366,839
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$273,865
- Increased Total Investment
$379,800
------------
Net Savings
-$105,935
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
0.72
-$105,935
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 1.33%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 95,579.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
95,579.0 kWh 1,911,318.3 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 326.1 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
326.1 MBtu 6,521.7 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
25,131.24 kg 0.00 kg 25,131.24 kg 502,555.91 kg
SO2
6.19 kg 0.00 kg
6.19 kg
123.87 kg
NOx
10.32 kg 0.00 kg
10.32 kg
206.45 kg
Total:
CO2
25,131.24 kg 0.00 kg 25,131.24 kg 502,555.91 kg
SO2
6.19 kg 0.00 kg
6.19 kg
123.87 kg
NOx
10.32 kg 0.00 kg
10.32 kg
206.45 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Almanor Equipment
Shop.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:41:05 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Almanor - Equipment Shop
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$92,050
-$92,050
$57,400
$0
$57,400
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$1,934
-$2,003
$3,937
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$59,334
-$2,003
$61,337
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$59,334
$90,047
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$61,337
- Increased Total Investment
$92,050
------------
Net Savings
-$30,713
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$30,713
SIR =
0.67
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.93%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 21,738.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
21,738.0 kWh 434,700.5 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 74.2 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
74.2 MBtu 1,483.3 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
5,715.72 kg 0.00 kg 5,715.72 kg 114,298.75 kg
SO2
1.41 kg 0.00 kg
1.41 kg
28.17 kg
NOx
2.35 kg 0.00 kg
2.35 kg
46.95 kg
Total:
CO2
5,715.72 kg 0.00 kg 5,715.72 kg 114,298.75 kg
SO2
1.41 kg 0.00 kg
1.41 kg
28.17 kg
NOx
2.35 kg 0.00 kg
2.35 kg
46.95 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Chester Ground
Mount.xml
File Name:
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:43:01 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Chester - Ground Mount
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$183,800
-$183,800
$126,722
$0
$126,722
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$4,315
-$6,588
$10,903
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$131,037
-$6,588
$137,625
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$131,037
$177,212
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$137,625
- Increased Total Investment
$183,800
------------
Net Savings
-$46,175
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$46,175
SIR =
0.75
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 1.52%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 48,264.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
48,264.0 kWh 965,147.9 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 164.7 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
164.7 MBtu 3,293.2 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
12,690.38 kg 0.00 kg 12,690.38 kg 253,772.88 kg
SO2
3.13 kg 0.00 kg
3.13 kg
62.55 kg
NOx
5.21 kg 0.00 kg
5.21 kg
104.25 kg
Total:
CO2
12,690.38 kg 0.00 kg 12,690.38 kg 253,772.88 kg
SO2
3.13 kg 0.00 kg
3.13 kg
62.55 kg
NOx
5.21 kg 0.00 kg
5.21 kg
104.25 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Chester Airbase.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:43:29 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Chester - Airbase Building
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$92,050
-$92,050
$56,285
$0
$56,285
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$1,919
-$1,934
$3,853
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$58,204
-$1,934
$60,139
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$58,204
$90,116
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$60,139
- Increased Total Investment
$92,050
------------
Net Savings
-$31,911
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
0.65
-$31,911
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.83%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 21,437.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
21,437.0 kWh 428,681.3 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 73.1 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
73.1 MBtu 1,462.7 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
5,636.58 kg 0.00 kg 5,636.58 kg 112,716.09 kg
SO2
1.39 kg 0.00 kg
1.39 kg
27.78 kg
NOx
2.32 kg 0.00 kg
2.32 kg
46.30 kg
Total:
CO2
5,636.58 kg 0.00 kg 5,636.58 kg 112,716.09 kg
SO2
1.39 kg 0.00 kg
1.39 kg
27.78 kg
NOx
2.32 kg 0.00 kg
2.32 kg
46.30 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Supervisors Office
Large Roof.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:43:59 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Supervisor's Office - Large Roof
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$150,200
-$150,200
$97,252
$0
$97,252
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$4,315
$4,464
-$149
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$101,567
$4,464
$97,103
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$101,567
$154,664
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
- Increased Total Investment
$97,103
$150,200
------------
Net Savings
-$53,097
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$53,097
SIR =
0.65
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.78%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 48,289.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
48,289.0 kWh 965,647.8 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 164.8 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
164.8 MBtu 3,294.9 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
12,696.95 kg 0.00 kg 12,696.95 kg 253,904.33 kg
SO2
3.13 kg 0.00 kg
3.13 kg
62.58 kg
NOx
5.22 kg 0.00 kg
5.22 kg
104.30 kg
Total:
CO2
12,696.95 kg 0.00 kg 12,696.95 kg 253,904.33 kg
SO2
3.13 kg 0.00 kg
3.13 kg
62.58 kg
NOx
5.22 kg 0.00 kg
5.22 kg
104.30 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Supervisors Office
Combined Roof.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:44:29 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Supervisor's Office - Combined Roof Array
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Comment
Includes both small and large PV array configurations
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$203,850
-$203,850
$136,418
$0
$136,418
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$6,041
$5,951
$89
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$142,458
$5,951
$136,507
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$142,458
$209,801
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$136,507
- Increased Total Investment
$203,850
------------
Net Savings
-$67,343
-$67,343
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
0.67
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.96%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 67,736.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
67,736.0 kWh 1,354,534.5 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 231.1 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
231.1 MBtu 4,621.9 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
17,810.29 kg 0.00 kg 17,810.29 kg 356,156.97 kg
SO2
4.39 kg 0.00 kg
4.39 kg
87.79 kg
NOx
7.32 kg 0.00 kg
7.32 kg
146.31 kg
Total:
CO2
17,810.29 kg 0.00 kg 17,810.29 kg 356,156.97 kg
SO2
4.39 kg 0.00 kg
4.39 kg
87.79 kg
NOx
7.32 kg 0.00 kg
7.32 kg
146.31 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Eagle Lake Office
Building.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:45:14 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Eagle Lake - Office Building
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$71,600
-$71,600
$53,579
$0
$53,579
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$2,068
$2,976
-$908
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$55,647
$2,976
$52,671
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$55,647
$74,576
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$52,671
- Increased Total Investment
$71,600
------------
Net Savings
-$18,929
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$18,929
SIR =
0.74
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 1.43%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 23,171.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
23,171.0 kWh 463,356.6 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 79.1 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
79.1 MBtu 1,581.0 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
6,092.51 kg 0.00 kg 6,092.51 kg 121,833.49 kg
SO2
1.50 kg 0.00 kg
1.50 kg
30.03 kg
NOx
2.50 kg 0.00 kg
2.50 kg
50.05 kg
Total:
CO2
6,092.51 kg 0.00 kg 6,092.51 kg 121,833.49 kg
SO2
1.50 kg 0.00 kg
1.50 kg
30.03 kg
NOx
2.50 kg 0.00 kg
2.50 kg
50.05 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Bogard Ground
Mount.xml
File Name:
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:45:58 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Bogard - Ground Mount
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$258,700
-$258,700
$164,413
$0
$164,413
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$5,624
-$8,471
$14,095
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$170,037
-$8,471
$178,509
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$170,037
$250,229
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$178,509
- Increased Total Investment
$258,700
------------
Net Savings
-$80,191
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$80,191
SIR =
0.69
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 1.11%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 62,977.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
62,977.0 kWh 1,259,367.6 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 214.9 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
214.9 MBtu 4,297.1 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
16,558.97 kg 0.00 kg 16,558.97 kg 331,134.07 kg
SO2
4.08 kg 0.00 kg
4.08 kg
81.62 kg
NOx
6.80 kg 0.00 kg
6.80 kg
136.03 kg
Total:
CO2
16,558.97 kg 0.00 kg 16,558.97 kg 331,134.07 kg
SO2
4.08 kg 0.00 kg
4.08 kg
81.62 kg
NOx
6.80 kg 0.00 kg
6.80 kg
136.03 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Bogard Warehouse.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:46:31 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Bogard - Warehouse
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$50,900
-$50,900
$26,611
$0
$26,611
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$908
-$848
$1,756
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$27,518
-$848
$28,366
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$27,518
$50,052
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$28,366
- Increased Total Investment
$50,900
------------
Net Savings
-$22,534
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
0.56
-$22,534
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.03%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 10,193.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
10,193.0 kWh 203,832.1 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 34.8 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
34.8 MBtu 695.5 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
2,680.11 kg 0.00 kg 2,680.11 kg 53,594.96 kg
SO2
0.66 kg 0.00 kg
0.66 kg
13.21 kg
NOx
1.10 kg 0.00 kg
1.10 kg
22.02 kg
Total:
CO2
2,680.11 kg 0.00 kg 2,680.11 kg 53,594.96 kg
SO2
0.66 kg 0.00 kg
0.66 kg
13.21 kg
NOx
1.10 kg 0.00 kg
1.10 kg
22.02 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Fall River Grount
Mount.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:47:19 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Fall River - Ground Mount
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$89,875
-$89,875
$43,398
$0
$43,398
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$1,592
-$2,598
$4,190
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$44,990
-$2,598
$47,588
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$44,990
$87,277
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$47,588
- Increased Total Investment
$89,875
------------
Net Savings
-$42,287
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$42,287
SIR =
0.53
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = -0.22%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 17,847.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
17,847.0 kWh 356,891.1 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 60.9 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
60.9 MBtu 1,217.8 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
4,692.63 kg 0.00 kg 4,692.63 kg 93,839.81 kg
SO2
1.16 kg 0.00 kg
1.16 kg
23.13 kg
NOx
1.93 kg 0.00 kg
1.93 kg
38.55 kg
Total:
CO2
4,692.63 kg 0.00 kg 4,692.63 kg 93,839.81 kg
SO2
1.16 kg 0.00 kg
1.16 kg
23.13 kg
NOx
1.93 kg 0.00 kg
1.93 kg
38.55 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: PV Base Case
General Information
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Fall River Roof
Mount.xml
File Name:
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:47:43 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Fall River - Roof Mount
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Comment
Bldg. #51788
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$79,950
-$79,950
$41,183
$0
$41,183
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
$1,518
-$2,391
$3,909
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$42,700
-$2,391
$45,092
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$42,700
$77,559
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
$45,092
- Increased Total Investment
$79,950
------------
Net Savings
-$34,858
-$34,858
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
0.56
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 0.09%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Electricity 16,936.0 kWh 0.0 kWh
16,936.0 kWh 338,673.6 kWh
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Electricity 57.8 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
57.8 MBtu 1,155.6 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Electricity
CO2
4,453.10 kg 0.00 kg 4,453.10 kg 89,049.76 kg
SO2
1.10 kg 0.00 kg
1.10 kg
21.95 kg
NOx
1.83 kg 0.00 kg
1.83 kg
36.58 kg
Total:
CO2
4,453.10 kg 0.00 kg 4,453.10 kg 89,049.76 kg
SO2
1.10 kg 0.00 kg
1.10 kg
21.95 kg
NOx
1.83 kg 0.00 kg
1.83 kg
36.58 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: SHW Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\Current Project Work\20.023 USFS\Economic
Analysis\USFS BLCC Files\Almanor Solar Hot Water.xml
Date of Study:
Mon Aug 30 09:22:52 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Almanor Solar Hot Water
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$12,000
-$12,000
$4,237
$0
$4,237
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
$0
$893
-$893
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$4,237
$893
$3,344
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$4,237
$12,893
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
- Increased Total Investment
$3,344
$12,000
------------
Net Savings
-$8,656
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$8,656
SIR =
0.28
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = -3.38%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
Liquified Petroleum Gas 109.5 Gal 0.0 Gal
109.5 Gal 2,189.7 Gal
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Type
Base Case Alternative
Liquified Petroleum Gas
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
9.0 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
9.0 MBtu 179.9 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Reduction
Reduction
Liquified Petroleum Gas
CO2
564.38 kg 0.00 kg
SO2
4.56 kg 0.00 kg
4.56 kg
91.12 kg
NOx
0.57 kg 0.00 kg
0.57 kg
11.39 kg
CO2
564.38 kg 0.00 kg
SO2
4.56 kg 0.00 kg
4.56 kg
91.12 kg
NOx
0.57 kg 0.00 kg
0.57 kg
11.39 kg
564.38 kg 11,286.12 kg
Total:
564.38 kg 11,286.12 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: SHW Base Case
General Information
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Bogard Solar Hot
Water.xml
File Name:
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:48:27 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Bogard Solar Hot Water
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting
Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$16,000
-$16,000
$3,769
$0
$3,769
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
$0
$893
-$893
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$3,769
$893
$2,876
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$3,769
$16,893
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
- Increased Total Investment
$2,876
$16,000
------------
Net Savings
-$13,124
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
-$13,124
SIR =
0.18
SIR is lower than 1.0; project alternative is not cost effective.
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = -5.47%
AIRR is lower than your discount rate; project alternative is not cost effective.
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback never reached during study period.
Discounted Payback never reached during study period.
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Type
Base Case Alternative
Liquified Petroleum Gas
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
97.4 Gal 0.0 Gal
97.4 Gal 1,947.7 Gal
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Type
Base Case Alternative
Liquified Petroleum Gas
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Savings
Savings
8.0 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
8.0 MBtu 160.0 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Type
Base Case Alternative
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Reduction
Reduction
Liquified Petroleum Gas
CO2
502.02 kg 0.00 kg
SO2
4.05 kg 0.00 kg
4.05 kg
81.05 kg
NOx
0.51 kg 0.00 kg
0.51 kg
10.13 kg
CO2
502.02 kg 0.00 kg
SO2
4.05 kg 0.00 kg
4.05 kg
81.05 kg
NOx
0.51 kg 0.00 kg
0.51 kg
10.13 kg
502.02 kg 10,038.97 kg
Total:
502.02 kg 10,038.97 kg
NIST BLCC 5.3-10: Comparative Analysis
Consistent with Federal Life Cycle Cost Methodology and Procedures, 10 CFR, Part 436, Subpart A
Base Case: Status Quo
Alternative: Biomass Base Case
General Information
File Name:
C:\Documents and Settings\aschmidt\Desktop\USFS BLCC Files\Eagle Lake Biomass.xml
Date of Study:
Fri Aug 13 17:49:29 PDT 2010
Project Name:
Eagle Lake Biomass Heating
Project Location:
California
Analysis Type:
FEMP Analysis, Energy Project
Analyst:
A. Schmidt
Base Date:
January 1, 2011
Service Date:
January 1, 2011
Study Period:
20 years 0 months(January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2030)
Discount Rate:
3%
Discounting Convention:
End-of-Year
Comparison of Present-Value Costs
PV Life-Cycle Cost
Base Case
Alternative
Savings from Alternative
Initial Investment Costs:
Capital Requirements as of Base Date
$0
$21,152
-$21,152
$162,707
$0
$162,707
Energy Demand Charges
$0
$0
$0
Energy Utility Rebates
$0
$0
$0
Water Costs
$0
$0
$0
Recurring and Non-Recurring OM&R Costs
$0
$49,932
-$49,932
Capital Replacements
$0
$0
$0
Residual Value at End of Study Period
$0
$0
$0
------------ ------------
------------
Future Costs:
Energy Consumption Costs
Subtotal (for Future Cost Items)
$162,707
$49,932
$112,775
------------ ------------
------------
Total PV Life-Cycle Cost
$162,707
$71,084
Net Savings from Alternative Compared with Base Case
PV of Non-Investment Savings
- Increased Total Investment
$112,775
$21,152
------------
Net Savings
$91,623
Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)
SIR =
5.33
$91,623
Adjusted Internal Rate of Return
AIRR = 11.99%
Payback Period
Estimated Years to Payback (from beginning of Service Period)
Simple Payback occurs in year
4
Discounted Payback occurs in year 4
Energy Savings Summary
Energy Savings Summary (in stated units)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Liquified Petroleum Gas 4,205.0 Gal 0.0 Gal
4,205.0 Gal 84,088.5 Gal
Energy Savings Summary (in MBtu)
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Consumption-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Savings
Savings
Liquified Petroleum Gas 345.5 MBtu 0.0 MBtu
345.5 MBtu 6,908.9 MBtu
Emissions Reduction Summary
Energy
-----Average
Annual
Emissions-----
Life-Cycle
Type
Base Case
Alternative
Reduction
Reduction
Liquified Petroleum Gas
CO2
21,673.34 kg 0.00 kg 21,673.34 kg 433,407.47 kg
SO2
174.99 kg 0.00 kg
174.99 kg
3,499.34 kg
NOx
21.87 kg 0.00 kg
21.87 kg
437.42 kg
Total:
CO2
21,673.34 kg 0.00 kg 21,673.34 kg 433,407.47 kg
SO2
174.99 kg 0.00 kg
174.99 kg
3,499.34 kg
NOx
21.87 kg 0.00 kg
21.87 kg
437.42 kg