Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures

advertisement
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
JB Pendry
The Blackett Laboratory
Imperial College
London SW7 2BZ
UK,
AJ Holden, DJ Robbins, and WJ Stewart
GEC-Marconi Materials Technology Ltd
Caswell
Towcester
Northamptonshire NN12 8EQ
UK
Abstract
A photonic structure consisting of an extended 3D network of thin wires is shown to
behave like a low density plasma of very heavy charged particles with a plasma
frequency in the GHz range. We show that the analogy with metallic behaviour in the
visible is rather complete, and the picture is confirmed by three independent
investigations: analytic theory, computer simulation, and experiments on a model
structure. The fact that the wires are thin is crucial to the validity of the picture. This
new composite dielectric, which has the property of negative ε below the plasma
frequency, opens new possibilities for GHz devices.
PACS: 61.85.+p
41.20.Jb
77.22.-d
84.90.+a
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 1
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
1. Introduction
This paper is concerned with the electromagnetic response of arrays of thin wires, a
typical example of which is shown in figure 1.
Figure 1. A periodic structure is composed of infinite wires arranged in a simple
cubic lattice. In the structures we consider, a might be a few millimetres and r a
few microns.
At one level this structure can be thought of as an array of aerials: a problem for the
electrical engineer. We shall show by simple analogy, by detailed computations, and by
experimental measurements, that the plasma resonance in a metal is an accurate
paradigm for these thin-wire structures.
Attention has already been drawn to the singular properties of metallic mesh structures
[1, 2]. However to exploit fully the 3D structure of a metallic mesh, radiation must
penetrate deep into the structure, something that is difficult to achieve with most
metallic structures whose properties simply reduce to those of a 2D grating. In our
earlier paper [2] we pointed out the significance of choosing thin wires, which reduces
the interaction of radiation sufficiently to allow penetration and to bring into play the
3D properties of the mesh.
Intense interest has been shown in periodic electromagnetic structures since
Yablonovitch’ [3] demonstration of a photonic band gap: see [4, 5] for recent reviews.
However most of the attention has been concentrated on dielectric structures. Metallic
structures have been considered in a very different context: energy loss in the electron
microscope [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Here it has been known for some time that the structure of
metallic objects, such as arrays of colloidal spheres, profoundly affects the loss
spectrum. This happens primarily through the metallic surface plasma modes [11, 12]
which couple very strongly to incident charged particles [13]. If the surfaces are not
flat there is also strong coupling to incident transverse modes.
Metals have a characteristic response to electromagnetic radiation due to the plasma
resonance of the electron gas [14, 15]. Ideally they are described by a dielectric
function of the form,
εmetal = 1 −
ω 2p
(1)
ω2
where the plasma frequency, ω p , is given in terms of the electron density, n, the
electron mass, me , and charge, e,
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 2
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
ω 2p =
ne 2
ε0me
(2)
Equation (1) implies a dispersion relation shown in figure 1.
Figure 2. Characteristic dispersion relationship for light in an ideal metal. Two
degenerate transverse modes emerge at the plasma frequency and asymptotically
approach the free light cone. A singly degenerate longitudinal plasma mode shows
no dispersion. Only evanescent modes (imaginary wave vector) exist below the
plasma frequency.
A longitudinal mode, the plasmon, appears at a fixed frequency, and two longitudinal
modes emerge at the plasma frequency. In consequence of the negative ε , only
evancescent modes (imaginary wave vector) exist below the plasma frequency and
below this threshold no radiation penetrates very far into the metal. In a normal metal
the ideal form is spoilt by the resistance which introduces damping,
εnormal = 1 −
b
ω 2p
g
(3)
ω ω + iγ
Typically γ becomes significant in the infra red. However for a superconductor the
condensate continues to display the ideal behaviour and we can, in fact, calculate the
London penetration depth from (1).
Much has been made of this dispersion relationship which for the transverse modes is
reminiscent of a relativistic massive particle. In particular, Anderson, [16] has pointed
out that the acquisition of mass along with the appearance of the dispersionless (i.e.
very massive) plasmon, is an example of the Higgs phenomenon. It certainly imparts
some unique qualities to metals: their ability to exclude light, the very strong
interaction with charges particles, and the curious resonant modes that appear on the
surface of a metal in consequence of the negative ε below ω p . The modes may
couple to incident radiation provided that the surface is not completely flat, and often
give a strong resonant response as in the surface enhanced Raman scattering seen at
rough silver surfaces.
Our motivation is to fabricate composite materials that replicate the characteristic
features of metallic response to radiation, but in the GHz range of frequencies rather
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 3
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
than in the visible. We are particularly interested in the property of negative ε , which
is not seen an any naturally occurring materials at these frequencies.
We shall first show that a simple analytic argument rapidly develops the plasma
analogy. Then we make some more serious calculations by solving Maxwell’s
equations on a computer and confirming that the simply theory works surprisingly
well: quantitative agreement at the 5% level is seen. Next we present experimental data
from a thin-wire structure manufactured using spark chamber technology borrowed
from high energy physics, and show that this confirms our plasma model with good
accuracy, again around the 5% level. Finally, the theory confirmed by experiment, we
use the computer to explore variations of the model and show that it is robust under
variations in the wire structure: the essential requirements are simply that we have a
three dimensional array of thin continuous wires.
2. An Approximate Analytic Theory
Before embarking on detailed numerical calculations it is helpful to develop some
insight by making an approximate analytical theory. Consider first the response to an
electric field applied parallel to one set of wires as shown in figure 3.
Figure 3. An array of wires aligned with the z-axis and arranged on a square
lattice in the x-y plane.
Constraining electrons to move along thin wires has two consequences.
The first is that average electron density is reduced because only part of space is filled
by metal,
neff = n
πr 2
(4)
a2
where n is the density of electrons in the wires themselves, r is the radius of the wire,
and a is the cell side of the square lattice on which the wires are arranged.
The second is an enhancement of the effective mass of the electrons caused by
magnetic effects. When any current flows a strong magnetic field is established around
the wire given by,
I
πr 2 nve
H R =
=
2 πR
2 πR
bg
(5)
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 4
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
where I is the current flowing in the wire, R is the distance from the wire, and v is the
mean electron velocity. We can express this field as,
bg
H R = µ 0− 1∇ × A
(6)
where,
µ0 πr 2 nve
bg
AR =
2π
b g
(7)
ln a / R
and a is the lattice constant. We shall justify this formula below.
We note that, from classical mechanics, electrons in a magnetic field have an additional
contribution to their momentum of eA , and therefore the momentum per unit length of
the wire is,
bg
eπr 2 nA r =
e
j lnb a / r g = m πr 2nv
eff
2
µ 0e 2 πr 2 n v
2π
(8)
where and meff is the new effective mass of the electrons given by,
µ e 2 πr 2n
meff = 0
ln a / r
2π
b g
(9)
Inserting the following values,
. ×10− 6 m,
r = 10
a = 5mm,
(10)
.
n = 1806
×1029 m -3 (aluminium)
gives a mass of,
meff = 2.4808 ×10− 26 kg
= 2.7233 ×104 me = 14.83m p
(11)
where me is the electron mass and m p the proton mass. This is an enormously
enhanced effective mass and shifts the plasma frequency by a correspondingly large
amount. From the classical formula for the plasma frequency,
neff e2
2 πc02
2
ωp =
=
ε0meff a 2 ln a / r
(12)
b g
where c0 is the velocity of light in free space. Substituting gives,
ω p = 515
. ×1010 rad - s-1 = 8.20GHz
(13)
in excellent agreement with the computational estimate of 8.3GHz which we shall
make in the next section.
Using equation (12) we can show the importance of thin wires. Supposing that the
wires were not thin so that we could neglect ln a / r . Then the free space wavelength
at the plasma frequency is,
b g
c
λ0 p = 2 π 0 ≈a 2 π
ωp
(14)
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 5
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
In other words without the effect of thin wires λ0 p is of the same order as the lattice
constant producing diffraction effects which confuse our simple picture. Furthermore if
we calculate the penetration depth at, say, half the plasma frequency,
b g
2 ln a / r
3π
penetration depth = a
(15)
we can see than without the thin wire effect radiation hardly penetrates the lattice at
all.
Now let us justify the formula quoted for A in equation (7). Suppose that we have a
plasmon-like longitudinal excitation in the system shown in figure 3, wave vector
parallel to the z-axis, with wavelength much longer that the lattice period, a.
b
D = 0, 0, D0 exp i kz − ω t
g
(16)
Next we calculate the associated magnetic field from,
∇ ×H =
∂D
+ j
∂t
(17)
Note that if both D and j have the same distribution in the x-y plane, then the right
hand side of the above equation vanishes and hence the magnetic field is zero. We can
see this by calculating the accompanying charge and current density implied by the
longitudinal field,
b
g
σ = ∇ ⋅D = ikD0 exp i kz − ω t ,
b
j = iω 0, 0, D0 exp i kz − ω t
g
(18)
Hence on substituting into (17) the two contributions vanish. This is what happens
inside a capacitor discharging through a uniform dielectric filling: no magnetic field is
generated.
In our case D and j have different distributions in the x-y plane. The current is confined
to the very thin wires whereas in the limit of long wavelength D is uniform in the x-y
plane. Hence in our case the magnetic field is non-zero and, as we shall show, happens
to be large close to the wire. Divide the x-y plane into square unit cells each centred on
a wire. On average each cell is has zero source with respect to the magnetic field. To
calculate the magnetic field we make the approximation of replacing each square cell
with a circle of the same area and having a uniform distribution of D just like the
square. The radius of the circle is,
Rc = a / π
(19)
At a given point in the x-y plane the magnetic field only has contributions from the
circle inside whose circumference it lies. All other circles have zero contribution. We
can easily calculate the magnetic field inside the circle,
2
j
j R
Hc =
−
,
2 πR 2 πR Rc2
= 0,
0 < R < Rc
(20)
R > Rc
and the corresponding vector potential points along the z- axis and has magnitude,
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 6
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
LM F I
MN GH JK
OP
PQ
R 2 − Rc2
µ0 j
R
ln
,
−
Ac R =
2π
Rc
2 Rc2
bg
= 0,
0 < R < Rc
(21)
R > Rc
where we have exploited our freedom to choose the constant of integration so that A
is zero outside the circle. The point of making this particular choice is that the Avector of one circle does not overlap with the centre of another and therefore the
mutual inductance between the wires has been addressed, at least in this
approximation. It only remains to evaluate the A-vector at the wire,
LM F I
MN GH JK
OP
PQ
LM F I
MN GH JK
2
r 2 − Rc2
µ0 j
µ0 j
1
r π πr
r
ln
ln
=
−
+
Ac r =
−
2
2
2
2π
2π
a
Rc
2 Rc
2a
bg
OP
PQ
(22)
Since in our example,
ln
FG r IJ= lnFG 10− 6 IJ= − 8.5
Ha K H5 ×10− 3 K
(23)
It is a good approximation to take,
FG IJ
HK
r
µ j
Ac r ≈ 0 ln
a
2π
bg
(24)
as we quoted above.
Corrections to the circle approximation are very small because the square cells already
have four-fold symmetry and therefore the residual magnetic field will fall off as R − 4 .
3. Solving Maxwell’s Equations - Numerical Simulations
Standard codes exist for the calculation of electromagnetic properties of structured
materials [17, 18, 19]. They function by dividing space into a mesh of points on which
the fields are sampled: typically a uniform mesh is used for simplicity. The problem for
thin-wire structures is that a uniform mesh makes an extremely poor sampling of the
intense fields near to the wire unless an unacceptably large number of points is used.
Otherwise a complex non-uniform mesh needs to be constructed. Fortunately we can
avoid both unpleasant alternatives by a simple trick.
The only interest we have in the response of the wires is in the external fields they
create far from the wires. Therefore if the thin wires are replaced by thicker wires
which have exactly the same external effect, the electromagnetic response will be
unaffected. However a thick wire with a relatively uniform distribution of field and
current will be much more easily sampled by a uniform mesh than the original thin
wire.
3.1 The Equivalent Conductance of Fibres
The objective is to take a wire of small radius in a set of external fields, and replace it
with an equivalent fibre of larger radius which has the same external fields see figure 4.
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 7
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 4. Our objective is to replace the thin wire with an equivalent thick wire
which gives the same external responses of the original wire.
The key quantity will be the current flowing along the length of the wire, J, which we
assume to be uniformly distributed over the cross section of the fibre: true if the wire is
very thin. This determines the local external magnetic field and therefore must take the
same value in both fibres. We calculate the current from the conductance of the wire,
J = πr12 σ1 E1z ,
(25)
J = πr22 σ2 E2 z
(26)
Ez has two components: a far-field external component, and a near-field inductive one.
First we relate the near field Ez to the magnetic field, then we relate the magnetic field
to J and require self consistency. We start from,
∇ ×E = + iω B
(27)
and apply Stokes' theorem to the circuit shown below in figure 5,
Figure 5. The contour of integration for the electric field is shown: it passes
just outside the wire and is closed by a line taken to be far from the wire.
giving,
z
z bg
R
E1 ⋅dl = iω B r dr
(28)
r1
Notice that the contour is everywhere outside the fibre. We shall also assume that there
is negligible variation of the relevant fields with z. We can write for the magnetic field,
neglecting the displacement current,
µ J
Bθ r = 0
2 πr
bg
(29)
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 8
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Substituting (29) into (28) gives,
µ J R
E1z = E0 + iω 0 ln
2 π r1
(30)
where we have required that the asymptotic fields are the same. Substituting into (25)
gives,
µ J R
J = πr12 σ1 E1z = πr12σ1 E0 + iω r12 σ1 0 ln
2
r1
(31)
hence,
J=
πr12 σ1 E0
(32)
R
1 − i 21 ω r12 σ1 µ 0 ln
r
1
Similarly we obtain for the second fibre,
J=
πr22 σ2 E0
1−
i 21 ω r22 σ2
(33)
R
µ 0 ln
r2
Inverting (33) we find the equivalent conductance of the second fibre,
σ2 =
J
(34)
R
πr22 E0 + i 21 Jω r22 µ 0 ln
r
2
and substituting from (32) we can express this in terms of the conductance of the
original fibre,
σ2 =
b
σ1 r1 r2
g2
b
1 − i 21 r12 σ1 ω µ 0 ln r2 r1
(35)
g
or alternatively we can express this in terms of a dielectric function,
b g2
σ1 r1 r2
σ
1
ε2 = 1 + i 2 = 1 + i
ω ε0
ωε0 1 + i 1 r12 σ1 ω µ 0 ln r1 r2
2
= 1+
b
g
(36)
1
b g2 − 12 r22ω 2c − 2 lnb r2 r1g
− iωε0σ1− 1 r2 r1
Thus we have found a way of replacing the real thin wire with a pseudowire much
better suited to computation. In doing so we assumed that the electric field and hence
the current was approximately uniform along the wire. This means that effects in which
there is local charging of the wire are not accurately reproduced. Also details of the
fields near the intersections of wires are not well treated. However we do not
anticipate that such details will have any significant consequences.
Fortunately for all transverse waves and for long wavelength longitudinal waves our
assumptions are well founded.
As a further precaution the accuracy of the assumptions was checked by repeating
numerical calculations for pseudowires of several different radii. If our assumptions are
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 9
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
accurate the results should be independent of the pseudowire radius, and this proved to
be the case.
We are now in a position to use our standard codes to calculate the properties of a
thin-wire lattice and the band structure is shown in figure 6 together with the relevant
parameters of the structure. Also plotted in the figure is the analytic estimate of the
dispersion relationship obtained in the previous section, though the computed points
fall so close to the lines as to obscure them in most instances. As far as the transverse
modes are concerned, an effective medium theory with dielectric function as specified
above models the data extremely well. The first longitudinal mode is also precisely
predicted by the plasmon model. However the ‘second harmonic’ of the plasmon at
15GHz is not captured by the effective medium. Not surprisingly because it is due to
trapping of the longitudinal mode travelling in the z-direction between consecutive sets
of x-y cross wires: a diffraction effect not included in the analytic theory.
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 10
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 6. Band structure: real (top) and imaginary (bottom) parts of the wave
vector for a simple cubic lattice, a=5mm, with wires along each axis consisting
of ideal metal wires, assumed 1µ in radius. The wave vector is assumed to be
directed along one of the cubic axes. The full lines, largely obscured by the data
points, represent the ideal dispersion of the longitudinal and transverse modes
defined above assuming a plasma frequency of 8.2GHz. The light cone is drawn
in for guidance. Note the two degenerate transverse modes in free space are
modified to give two degenerate modes that are real only above the plasma
frequency of 8.2GHz.. The new feature in the calculation is the longitudinal
mode at the new plasma frequency.
C:/word/wires/wires1.doc at 17/02/99
page 11
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
4. Experiments on a Model Structure
4.1 Construction of a negative epsilon material
Thus far our treatment has been entirely theoretical and it is very desirable to confirm
the conclusions through experiment, especially as we make radical predictions for the
effective dielectric response of the structure. A fully three dimensional structure would
be difficult and expensive to manufacture so instead we opted for a simplified version,
shown below in figures 7 and 8, that tests all the assumptions made in our theory, but
is more amenable to manufacture. A transverse wave incident along the z-axis will
activate only the x-y wires. The z-wires are irrelevant.
Fortunately for us, thin tungsten wires coated with gold are routinely employed in
particle detectors and we were able to persuade the high energy physicists at Imperial
College to manufacture the structure for us. It consisted of alternating sheets of 3mm
polystyrene ‘rohacell’ onto which parallel rows of a nominal 20 micron diameter gold
plated tungsten wire had been placed with a 5mm spacing. The sheets were then
stacked alternating at right angles to one another resulting in a 5mm×5mm×6mm unit
cell and overall dimensions of 200mm×200mm×120mm, as shown in figure 7 below.
The building blocks are then stacked into a 3D array, alternate layers rotated by 90
degrees. The structure could be dismantled and reassembled with ‘spacer layers’ of
blank rohacell added to alter the density of wires and therefore the plasma frequency.
Figure 7. Realisation of a negative epsilon structure. Thin gold plated tungsten
wires, nominally 20 microns in diameter, are laid in parallel rows onto
polystyrene sheets and built into the structure shown above. The aperture is
200mm×200mm.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 12
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 8. Realisation of a negative epsilon structure. Thin gold plated tungsten
wires, nominally 20 microns in diameter, are laid in parallel rows onto
polystyrene sheets and built into the structure shown above. The aperture is
200mm×200mm.
Figure 9. Realisation of a negative epsilon structure: photograph of the
structure shown in figure 8. The aperture is 200mm×200mm.
The structure was then handed over to the GEC-Marconi laboratories where
measurements were made of the reflection and transmission coefficients.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 13
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
We expect several characteristic features, particularly in the transmission coefficient:
• Below the plasma frequency epsilon becomes negative and the wave vector
imaginary. Hence transmitted intensity falls off exponentially with thickness.
• Below the plasma frequency there is no variation of phase as the wave crosses the
sample because the wave vector is imaginary.
• Above the plasma frequency the wave vector becomes real and the transmission
coefficient grows rapidly to of the order of unity. The rate at which the transmission
rises is a measure of how resistive the wires are.
• At the same time the phase starts to vary with frequency in a manner which reveals
the underlying dispersion of k ω .
bg
• A less pronounced feature in both transmission and reflection coefficients will be the
Fabry Perot resonances which arise from multiple reflections of the wave within the
structure.
4.2 Measurement on the dense negative epsilon structure
In the first set of measurements the original structure with a dense packing of wires
was used. In figure 10 we show the calculated band structure which shows that the
plasma edge occurs at approximately 9GHz hence we expect a threshold for
transmission at this frequency. The experimental data are shown in figure 11.
Figure 10. Band structure for the original dense structure, assuming that the
wires have zero resistance, and their stated diameter of 20 microns. Real bands:
+++, imaginary bands: xxx. The full lines show the dispersion of light in free
space.
Next we calculated the transmitted amplitudes for various values of the parameters.
The RF resistance of the wires was not available to us so we treated this as a free
parameter and, although the wires have a nominal radius of 20 microns, the radius was
also used as a parameter. Figure 11 shows the effect of varying the resistance (shown
in ohms per metre) and the radius. In general the radius shifts the threshold in
frequency, but with a very slow logarithmic dependence, as can be seen from the
lateral shift of the curves. In contrast the resistance controls the amplitude giving a
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 14
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
vertical displacement of the curves. The best fit to the radius is about 30 microns, and
to the resistance 18,000 ohms.
Figure 11. Experimental measurements (grey curve) of the transmitted
amplitude (i.e. square root of the intensity) through 120mm of a dense photonic
wire structure with a 5mm×5mm×6mm unit cell containing two sets of wires at
right angles. The full lines in the top figure show three sets of calculations
assuming various resistances for the wires, and a diameter of 30 microns. In the
middle figure the wire diameter is varied. In the last figure the rest of the
frequency range is shown for the optimum parameters.
The important conclusion is that the experimental data show the predicted qualitative
behaviour, and that the fitted parameters are close to the given ones.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 15
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Fine structure observed on the curves is due to multiple reflections inside the sample.
Although the experiment does show oscillations they have a shorter period indicating
some small stray signals from outside the sample that have a somewhat longer path
length.
Having fitted the parameters in the vicinity of the threshold we calculated the
transmission coefficient for the higher range of frequencies and compared to
experiment. Note that if we ignore the high frequency oscillations due to spurious
reflections, the agreement of absolute amplitudes is good.
Next we compared the calculated and measured phases in figure 12. Assuming that
most of the contribution to the transmitted amplitude arises from direct transmission
through the sample without multiple scattering, the phase will be given by,
bg
φ= k ω d
(37)
where d is the thickness of the sample: 120mm in this instance. Therefore the phase is a
direct measurement of the dispersion relationship k ω to which it is very sensitive
because of the relatively large value of d. Below threshold at 9GHz the phase is not
well defined in the experiment, presumably because of spurious reflections. Above
threshold agreement is excellent: between 9GHz and 18GHz the phase scans though a
range of approximately 6×360° with an error of around 3%.
bg
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 16
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 12. Experimental measurements (grey curve) of the phase transmitted
through 120mm of a photonic wire structure with a 5mm×5mm×6mm unit cell
containing two sets of wires at right angles. The random jumps in phase of π
are due to small measurement noise. The full lines show a calculation assuming
a resistance of 18,000 ohms/m for the wires, and a diameter of 30 microns.
4.3 Measurement on the double period negative epsilon structure
Having completed measurements on the dense structure, it was dismantled and
reassembled to the same thickness of 120mm but interspersing each wire sheet with a
blank polystyrene sheet. The effect of diluting the wires is to reduce the threshold for
transmission as can be seen from the band structure shown in figure 13.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 17
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 13. Band structure for the reassembled double period structure with a
5mm×5mm×12mm unit cell containing two sets of wires at right angles,
assuming that the wires have zero resistance, and their stated diameter of 20
microns. Real bands: +++, imaginary bands: xxx. The full lines show the
dispersion of light in free space. Ignore the numerical instabilities below 5GHz.
Some numerical instability creeps into the calculations at low frequencies but the key
point is the threshold which has now moved down from 9GHz to 6GHz as a
consequence of the more sparse distribution of wires. Additionally we see at higher
frequencies around 14GHz a band gap induced by Bragg scattering from the periodic
wire structure. In this frequency range we expect a reduced transmission coefficient
details of which can be used further to support our theoretical treatment.
In figure 14 we show the calculated transmitted amplitude. Since we have already
determined the wire parameters we should find that the same parameters fit for the
double period structure. The previous calculations did not take account of the
dielectric constant of the polystyrene sheets. Figure 14 shows that its effect near
threshold at 6GHz is almost completely compensated for by varying the diameter of
the wires. However at higher frequencies of 14GHz, near the band gap where the
transmission coefficient takes a dip, the wire diameter is much less important than the
dielectric constant.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 18
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 14. Calculated transmitted amplitude (i.e. square root of the intensity)
through 120mm of a double period photonic wire structure with a
5mm×5mm×12mm unit cell containing two sets of wires at right angles. We
assume the same resistance for the wires as used in the dense structure, 18,000
ohms/m. Two diameters are used, 20 microns and 30 microns, and the
dielectric constant of the polystyrene host, ε = 107
. , is taken into account in
two of the calculations.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 19
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 15. Experimental measurements (grey curve) of the transmitted
amplitude through 120mm of a double period photonic wire structure with a
5mm×5mm×12mm unit cell containing two sets of wires at right angles. The
full line shows a calculation in which we assume the same resistance for the
wires as used in the dense structure, 18,000 ohms/m, and a diameter of 30
microns. The dielectric constant of the polystyrene host, ε = 107
. , is taken into
account in the calculation.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 20
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 16. Experimental measurements (grey curve) of the phase transmitted
through 120mm of a photonic wire structure with a 5mm×5mm×12mm unit cell
containing two sets of wires at right angles. The full lines show a calculation
assuming a resistance of 18,000 ohms/m for the wires, and a diameter of 30
microns and correspond to the amplitudes shown in figure 15.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 21
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Comparing calculations to experiment gives a best fit with a diameter of 30 microns as
before, and ε = 107
. , though the latter parameter is probably only just distinguished
from unity. The best fit calculations are compared to experiment in figure 15. The
threshold at 6GHz is very well reproduced. The band gap for the most part is well
reproduced. The reduction in intensity at the centre of the gap is confirmation that we
have calculated the correct imaginary wave vector which in turn measures the
interaction of the wave with the wire structure at these higher frequencies.
One slightly surprising discrepancy is the disagreement between 11GHz and 12 GHz
where experiment shows 10dB less transmission than the calculation. These
frequencies are just below the band gap. There is a less pronounced disagreement just
above the band gap. It could be that the RF resistance of the wires is greater than at
lower frequencies leading to increased loss in transmission.
Next the transmitted phases were compared in figures 16. Once again, below the
threshold at 6GHz, the phase is ill defined because the transmitted intensity is so small.
However from the threshold upwards to the beginning of the band gap at 12GHz there
is good agreement. Through the gap itself there is an interesting hiccup which is mostly
reproduced, but again the lower side of the gap is a region where agreement is less
than perfect indicating the need for some further fine tuning of parameters.
4.4 Conclusions on comparison to experiment
The most important conclusion is confirmation from experiment of the qualitative
feature of negative epsilon below a threshold frequency, as evidenced by the cut off in
transmission. In addition we appear to be able to make quantitative predictions for the
system, at least at the 5% level of accuracy. The main uncertainty here is the RF
resistance of the wire which was fitted to experiment. Independent confirmation of the
value used would be helpful particularly if the frequency dependence could be
established. There were some minor discrepancies such as the high frequency
oscillations dues to multiple scattering processes. In the calculations these were due to
multiple passes of the sample, but experiment showed a much shorter period indicating
some stray reflections from outside the sample. Theory showed some shortcomings in
describing the recovery in transmission coefficient at the lower edge of the band gap.
Overall our theory seems to have good predictive power for these structures.
C:/word/wires/wires2.doc at 17/02/99
page 22
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
5. Further Tests of the Plasmon Model
5.1 Does the Negative Epsilon Property Depend on Direction?
This question is easily answered by extending our earlier calculations for wave vector k
lying along the (001) direction of the simple cubic wire lattice to other directions. Our
calculations proceed by fixing ω and k / / then finding k z . We show below the
trajectory taken by the photon wave vector once k / / is fixed.
Figure 17. Our programs calculate the band structure, k z , for fixed ω and k / / as
shown in this sketch.
In a periodic structure the wave vector is defined only within the Brillouin zone. In the
case of a simple cubic lattice this consists of a cube centred on the origin extending
from,
k x = ±π/ a
k y = ±π/ a
(38)
k z = ±π/ a
We expect the ideal behaviour defined in the last section to hold only over a limited
range of k and ω . However it is desirable that the material should be close to ideal in
the vicinity of ω p and down to as low a frequency as the conductivity of the metal
wires permits.
In free space the direction of a wave is defined by,
k x , k y , kz
(39)
constrained by,
k x2 + k y2 + k z2 = ω 2c0− 2
(40)
thus it is possible at a given ω to map out all possible k x , k y provided that we are
prepared to allow k z to be imaginary. For example this can be arranged immediately
outside a high refractive index material where an evanescent wave may decay strongly
into the vacuum. However we suppose that in most practical situations we shall be
confined to situations where k x , k y , k z are all real thus limiting the range of values
which they make take. In figure 18 we show the range of wave vectors allowed for
frequencies up to 20GHz, approximately twice the plasma frequency, and we shall be
content if the ideal model holds within this circle.
Note that the lattice constant, a, is small compared to a free wave at the plasma
frequency. This is because the wires are very thin. In consequence the important range
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 23
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
of wave vectors does not reach to the Brillouin zone boundaries which are set by the
unit cell dimensions as shown in figure 18.
Figure 18. The photon wave vector projected onto the (001) surface Brillouin
zone. The circle shows the magnitude of the wave vector for a 20GHz photon.
The band structure in figure 6 is calculated for wave vectors perpendicular to
the surface represented by point A in this figure. Other band structure
calculations are presented below for non-zero projections of the wave vector
onto the surface represented by points B, C, D and E.
First we test for wave vectors inside the 20GHz circle: points A, B, C, D, in figure 18.
We assume a plasma frequency of 8.3GHz and plot the dispersion of the longitudinal
and transverse modes using this single parameter,
ω 2 = c02 k x2 + c02 k y2 + c02 k z2 + ω 2p
(41)
and compare with our computations.
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 24
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 19. Band structure: real parts of the wave vector for a simple cubic
lattice, a=5mm, with cylinders along each axis consisting of ideal metal fibres,
assumed 1µ in radius. The component of the wave vector along the z-axis is
shown, and the component in the surface plane lies along the x-axis with a
value shown by points B (top), C (centre), D (bottom) in figure 18. The full
lines denote the ideal dispersion relationship expected from equation (41)
assuming a plasma frequency of 8.3GHz.
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 25
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Thus in the range of parameters within which we are concerned to test our theory, the
computed data fit the model very well: the longitudinal mode is dispersion free to
within 10% or 20% indicating that ε is indeed essentially independent of k, and the
transverse modes are also well reproduced.
As a matter interest we test a remote point at the farthest corner of the
Brillouin zone, point E in figure 18. The results are shown in figure 20.
Figure 20. Band structure: real parts of the wave vector for a simple cubic
lattice, a=5mm, with cylinders along each axis consisting of ideal metal fibres,
assumed 1µ in radius. The component of the wave vector along the z-axis is
shown, and the component in the surface plane takes a value k x = π/ a ,
k y = π/ a (point E in figure 18). Full lines denote the ideal dispersion
relationship expected from equation (41) assuming a plasma frequency of
8.3GHz.
Clearly when we stray too far out into k-space the model breaks down. Nevertheless,
even though our calculations are not described by the ideal plasma model, the material
still exhibits the negative epsilon property below the plasma frequency and the
structure is approximately isotropic in its properties provided that we do not subject
the structure to very short wavelength disturbances. It appears that provided that all
three wave vectors, k x , k y , k z , are small so that,
λx = 2π / k x > > a ,
λy = 2π / k y > > a ,
λz = 2π / k z > > a
(42)
then the ideal model holds good: the photon is too myopic to resolve details of the
lattice and sees only an average picture described by an effective local ε .
5.2 Is the Detailed Arrangement of the Wires Important?
First we ask how important it is that the three sets of wires touch at the corner of the
cells. To answer this question we devised the structure shown in figure 21 where the
wires are arranged so as not to touch one another.
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 26
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 21. A perspective view of the unit cell for a cubic lattice of nontouching wires. Each wire bisects a side of the unit cell as shown.
Figure 22. Band structure: real (circles) and imaginary (squares) parts of the
wave vector for a simple cubic lattice, a=5mm. Top panel: wires along all three
axes, intersecting at the corners of the cell (cf figure 6); middle panel: wires
along all three axes but arranged as shown in figure 21 so as not to touch.
bottom panel: wires along only the z-axis. The wires are assumed 1µ in radius.
The result shown in the second panel of figure 22 is interesting: the transverse modes
appear almost exactly the same as in the connected geometry, shown for reference in
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 27
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
to top panel, see also figure 6, but the longitudinal mode is very different. The
relatively high dispersion of the longitudinal mode means that the structure does not fit
our ideal model, and in particular ε depends on both q and ω which gives difficulties
when matching wave functions at the boundary of the material (the Additional
Boundary Condition problem). Nevertheless epsilon is undoubtedly negative at low
frequencies and this structure merits further investigation.
The most obvious question is whether we need a structure with fibres in all three
directions? The answer is almost obvious: transverse modes travelling along the wires
will surely see nothing of the wires because their electric fields are perpendicular to
them, but longitudinal modes will be strongly affected. Calculations for a single set of
wires are shown in the second panel of figure 22.
Note that the transverse modes, the modes which extend down to ω = 0 , are almost
completely unaffected by the wires and remain free photon like, but the longitudinal
mode has at k z = 0 exactly the same frequency, 8.3GHz, as in both the 3D examples,
but its dispersion with k z is strong resembling that for the 3D structure of
unconnected wires, second panel. The transverse wires, when connected to the z-wires,
appear to play the role of confining dispersion of the longitudinal mode with k z .
Although not shown in figure 22, the effect of removing wires parallel to the z-axis is
to leave the transverse modes unaffected, but to remove the plasma mode completely.
We can summarise the effect of removing sets of wires as follows: those modes whose
electric fields are parallel to the wires will revert to their free photon format.
5.3 Is the Connectivity of the Wires Important
We might suspect that the continuity of the wires is an important attribute: for one
thing it ensures a DC conductivity to the structure an the absence of any modes with
real wave vector at low frequencies. Let us investigate what happens if we sever the
wires: in each unit cell 40% of each of the three wires is cut away. The remaining 60%
of the wire is now disconnected from wires in neighbouring cells. The results are
shown in figure 23.
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 28
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 23. Band structure: real (circles) and imaginary (squares) parts of the
wave vector for a simple cubic lattice, a=5mm. Top panel: wires along all three
axes, intersecting at the corners of the cell (cf figure 6); bottom panel: as above
but the cylinders are cut into segments occupying 60% of the cell length. The
wires are assumed 1µ in radius.
The results of cutting the wires into disjointed segments is quite striking: whereas all
modes were excluded from low frequencies in the case of continuous wires, now the
transverse modes reappear at low frequencies with free-photon like dispersion
reflecting the fact that the material is effectively an insulator in the low frequency
regime. A longitudinal mode still exists close to the old plasma frequency but can
hardly be interpreted as a plasma mode because its controlling influence on the
transverse modes has disappeared. In fact the results look more like those for a system
of interacting dipoles [20].
We conclude that continuity of the wires is vital to observing the plasma-like
behaviour. Severance of the wires immediately results in reappearance of transverse
modes at low frequencies and vanishing of the ‘negative epsilon’ property. Other
changes to the structure have less severe consequences. We have experimented with
structures into which extra lengths of wire have been introduced, for example the
structure shown in figure 24. Calculations show that, provided the connectivity of the
wires is maintained, the structure continues to behave like a plasma, but the plasma
frequency is lowered by the extra inductance of the greater length of wire.
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 29
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
Figure 24 A connected bent wire structure showing the unit cell on the left,
and four neighbouring cells on the right. The wires are connected at the cell
vertices.
6. Conclusions
We have made a thorough investigation of the properties of structures made from 3D
arrays of continuous thin wires. and shown that the properties of such structures are
well described by a plasma model. The structures are characterised by a plasma
frequency below which all modes decay exponentially, and above which transverse
modes propagate like massive particles. At the plasma frequency there is a longitudinal
mode. These properties were established by analytical modelling (which proved
surprisingly accurate), numerical solution of Maxwell’s equations, and finally by
experimental investigation.
The wires had to be continuous and, unless they were thin, the fields penetrated no
more than one layer below the plasma frequency. Using thin wires also reduced the
plasma frequency so that externally incident waves at this frequency had too long a
wavelength to be diffracted. This meant that the system could be accurately described
by an effective dielectric constant of the plasma form.
Having established this principle we now have a playground for creating novel systems.
Material with these dielectric properties will couple very strongly to electrical charge
(
and will be efficient at extracting energy as a form of Cerenkov radiation into the slow
travelling modes near the plasma frequency. Further, the plasma mode can be further
tailored by the external structure of the composite. For example, the surface of such a
composite will be host to a surface plasma mode at,
ωs = ω p
2
(43)
Although our prime interest in these structures is to develop novel composite materials
for microwave applications, there are other possibilities raised by the structure. The
connection to superconductivity has been alluded to: in particular the negative epsilon
property will survive down to DC frequencies if the wires are made from
superconducting material. This raises the intriguing observation that we now can
manufacture a composite superconducting material in which the plasma energy, hω p ,
is of the same order as the pairing energy, ∆ . In conventional superconductors the
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 30
Low Frequency Plasmons in Thin Wire Structures
plasma frequency is much too high to play any direct role in pairing, but could our new
composite change this?
The material has an extremely simple internal structure and employs only minute
amounts of metal: structures consisting of parts per million of metal can be active in
the microwave region. This presents us with many opportunities for design.
Acknowledgements
We thank Derek Miller and Dave Clark, of the High Energy Physics group at Imperial
College, who were responsible for constructing our model negative epsilon structure,
also Les Hill of GEC-Marconi Materials Technology Ltd who measured the response
of the model. This work has been carried out with the support of the Defence Research
Agency, Holton Heath.
References
[1]
Sievenpiper D F Sickmiller M E and Yablonovitch E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett., 76
2480
[2]
Pendry J B Holden A J Stewart W J and Youngs I 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4773
[3]
Yablonovitch E Gmitter T J and Leung K M 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 2295
[4]
Yablonovitch E 1993 J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 5, 2443
[5]
Pendry J B 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 1085
[6]
Ritchie R H and Howie A 1981 Philos. Mag. A44 931
[7]
Echenique P M and Pendry J B 1975 J. Phys. C 8 2936
[8]
Ferrell T L and Echenique P M 1985 Phys Rev Lett 55 1526
[9]
Echenique P M Howie A and Wheatley D J 1987 Philos. Mag. B56 335
[10] Howie A and Walsh C A 1991 Micros. Microanal. Microstruc. 2 171
[11] Ritchie R H 1957 Phys. Rev. 106 874
[12] Stern E A and Ferrell R A 1960 Phys. Rev. 120 130
[13] Pendry J B and Martín Moreno L 1994 Phys. Rev. B50 5062
[14] Pines D and Bohm D 1952 Phys. Rev. 85 338
[15] Bohm D and Pines D 1953 Phys. Rev. 92 609
[16] Anderson P W 1963 Phys. Rev. 130 439
[17] Pendry J B and MacKinnon A 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2772
[18] Pendry J B and MacKinnon A 1993 J. Mod. Optics 41 209
[19] Bell P M Pendry J B Martín Moreno L and Ward A J 1995 Comp. Phys. Comm.
85 306
[20] van Coevorden D V Sprik R Tip A and Lagendijk A 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77
2412
C:/word/wires/wires3.doc at 17/02/99
page 31
Download