1
TDGL Equations for Two-Band Superconductor
V.L.OSTROVSKI
ORT Braude college,Karmiel,21982, Israel
Abstract
Green’s function techniques for studying nonequilibrium processes
in two-band superconductor are discussed. Perturbation expansions
and Green’s function equations are developed. A time dependent
modification of the Ginsburg-Landau equation is given.
Introduction.
Time dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) equation has proven to
be very successful in the theory of superconductivity [1-11]. The
usual classification of superconductors characterizes materials by onecomponent order parameter. However the properties of some
compounds (e.g. MgB2 , Nb2 Se , V3 Si ) are described by two-band model
[12] with two- component order parameter. The two-gap GL model
(the two gaps arise from the existence of two bands) has been
proposed [13, 14] at the dawn of superconductivity theory. The
interest to the two-gap model has recently been renewed after
the discovery the superconductivity in magnesium diboride[15-42] .
The studies below are based on a set of Ginzburg-Landau equations
for the order parameters of a two-band system. We focus our attention
mainly on the overlapping of energy bands on the Fermi surface and
on anisotropy due to different dimensions of the energy bands under
study.
E-mail: vostrovski@gmail.com
2
1. Green’s functions in the Gor’kov representation.
The two-band pairing Hamiltonian in the BCS theory in the
absence of external field is given by
Hˆ  Hˆ 0  Hˆ int
(1.1)
Where
Hˆ 0   d 3 r ˆ n (r )ˆn ( pˆ )ˆ n (r )
(1.2)
n
is the Hamiltonian of noninteracting quasiparticles, ˆn ( pˆ ) =
pˆ 2
n 

2mn
indexes,
,

is the chemical potential ,
 n ( p)   n 
p2

2mn
n  1, 2
are the band
is the dispersion relation of quasiparticles
in the n-th band , mn is the effective mass, and ˆ n ,ˆ n are the
creation and annihilation field operators in the Heisenberg
representation for quasiparticles in band n with spin   or  .
Hˆ int   Vnm  d 3r ˆ n (r )ˆ n  (r )ˆ m  (r )ˆ m (r )(1    ) 
nm
 
  Vnm  d 3r  ˆ n (r )ˆ n (r )ˆ m (r )ˆ m (r ) 
nm
ˆ n (r )ˆ n (r )ˆ m (r )ˆ m (r )
(1.3)

is the Hamiltonian of interaction, V11 ,V22 are the constants of
intraband interaction, V12 ,V21 are the constants of interband
3
interaction (Vnm  Vmn ) .The model assumes the formation of Cooper pairs
in each band and the tunneling of these pairs as a whole from one band
into another. The equation of motion for Heisenberg operators
ˆ n (r , t ),ˆ n (r , t ) have the form.
The formulas (1.11) are equivalent to
i
ˆ n (r , t )
 ˆnˆ n (r , t )  Vnmˆ m   (r , t )ˆ m  (r , t )ˆ n (r , t )(1    ),
t
m 
i
ˆ n (r , t )
 ˆnˆ n  (r , t )  Vnmˆ n (r , t )ˆ m   (r , t )ˆ m  (r , t )(1    ),
t
m 
Inserting
ˆn 
pˆ 2
  n
2mn
(1.4)
in the (1.4) we obtain

ˆ n (r , t )  pˆ 2

    n ˆ n (r , t )  Vnmˆ m   (r , t )ˆ m  (r , t )ˆ n (r , t )(1    ),
 2m

t
m 
 n

 pˆ 2

ˆ n (r , t )
i
 
    n ˆ n  (r , t )  Vnmˆ n (r , t )ˆ m   (r , t )ˆ m  (r , t )(1    ) (1.5)
 2m

t
m 
 n

i
The Green’s function is defined by
Gn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i Tt ˆ n  r1 , t1 ˆ m    r2 , t2  
N ,N
(1.6)
4
where
...
N ,N
denotes the statistical averaging of matrix element
between states with N and N’ particles.
For systems having no net spin polarization
Gn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   Gnm (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )
Then
i
 


Gn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i Tt  i ˆ n  r1 , t1 ˆ m    r2 , t2  
t1
 t1


N ,N
  pˆ 2


 i Tt  ( 1     n )ˆ n (r1 , t1 )   Vnlˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ n ( r1 , t1 )(1    ) ˆ m    r2 , t2  


l 

  2mn

(
pˆ12
    n )(i ) Tt ˆ n  r2 , t2 ˆ m   r1 , t1  
2mn
N ,N

 Vnl (i ) Tt ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ n (r1 , t1 )ˆ m    r2 , t2  (1    ) 
l 
N ,N

  r1  r2    t1  t2    
(
pˆ12
    n )Gn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i  Vnl (i ) Tt ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ n (r1 , t1 ) 
2mn
l 
(i ) Tt ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ m    r2 , t2  
(
N  2, N
N ,N 2

(1    )    r1  r2    t1  t2    
pˆ12
    n )Gn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i  Vnl Fl ,n (r1 , t1 ; r1 , t1 ) F  l ,m  (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )(1    ) 
2mn
l 
  r1  r2    t1  t2   
where
F  n ,m  (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  i Tt ˆ n  r1 , t1 ˆ m    r2 , t 2  
and
F
n , m 
(r1 , t1; r2 , t 2 )  i Tt ˆ n  r1, t1 ˆ m   r2, t 2  
N  2, N
N , N 2

N ,N
5
are the anomalous Green’s functions which satisfy the relations
Fn ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  g  Fnm (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )
F  n ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  g  F  nm (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )
 0 1
g   

 1 0 
For the function
Gnm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 ) we
obtain the following equation
 

pˆ 2
 1     n  Gnm (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i  Vnl Fln (r1 , t1 ; r1 , t1 ) F  lm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 ) 
i
l
 t1 2mn

(1.7)
   r1  r2    t1  t2 
The function
i
F  n ,m  (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )
satisfies the equation
 

 
F n ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i Tt  i ˆ n  r1 , t1 ˆ m    r2 , t2  
t1
 t1


N  2, N
   pˆ 2



 i Tt    
    n ˆ n (r1 , t1 )   Vnlˆ n (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )(1     ) ˆ m    r2 , t2  

   2mn

l 




pˆ 2
 ( 1     n )  i Tt ˆ n  r1 , t1 ˆ m   (r2 , t2 ) 

2mn
N  2, N


  Vnl  i Tt ˆ n (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ m   r2 , t2  

l 
N  2, N
(1    )  

pˆ12
 (
    n ) F  n ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i  Vnl (i ) Tt ˆ n  r1 , t1  ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )

N  2, N
2mn
l 
pˆ 2
(i ) Tt ˆ l  (r1 , t1 )ˆ m    r2 , t2  
(1    )  ( 1     n ) F  n ,m  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 ) 
N ,N
2mn
i  Vnl F  n ,l  (r1 , t1 ; r1 , t1 )Gl , m   r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2  (1    )
l 

N  2, N
6
or
 

pˆ 2
 1     n  F  nm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  i Vnl F  nl (r1 , t1; r1 , t1 )Glm  r1 , t1; r2 , t2   0
i
l
 t1 2mn

(1.8)
Since the nondiagonal functions are supposed neglected
G12 , G21 ≪ G11 , G22 ,
F12 , F21 ≪ F11 , F22
the system (1.7),(1.8) takes the form
 

pˆ12
i

    n  Gnn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  i  Vnl Fll (r1 , t1 ; r1 , t1 ) F  nn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 ) 

l
 t1 2mn

   r1  r2    t1  t2 
(1.9)
 

pˆ12
i

    n  F  nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  i Vnl F ll (r1 , t1; r1 , t1 )Gnn  r1 , t1; r2 , t2   0

l
 t1 2mn

Let’s define the order parameter
n  r , t 
as follows
 n  r , t   i  Vnl Fll (r , t ; r , t ),
(1.10)
l


n
 r , t   i 

Vnl F ll (r , t ; r , t )
l
Then (1.8), (1.7) may be rewritten in the form
 

pˆ12
i

    n  Gnn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   n  r1 , t1  F  nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t 2 ) 

 t1 2mn

   r1  r2    t1  t2 
 

pˆ 2
 1     n  F  nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  n  r1 , t1  Gnn  r1 , t1; r2 , t2   0
i
 t1 2mn

(1.11)
(1.12)
The pair of equations (1.11),(1.12) are Gor’kov equations for
two-band superconductor.
7
The equation (1.10) is the self-consistency condition.
2. A time dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation
In the limit case Vnm  0 we have
(1.11),(1.12) obtains the form
n  0
and the system
 

pˆ12
i

    n  G 0 nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )    r1  r2    t1  t2 

 t1 2mn

F 
0
nn
The
(2.1)
(r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  0
(2.2)
system (1.10), (1.11) we may rewrite as integral equations
Gnn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   dr3dt3 g  0 n (r1 , t1 ; r3 , t3 )  n (r3 , t3 ) Fnn (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 ) 
 g (0) n (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )
F  nn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   dr3dt3 g n ( r1 , t1; r3 , t3 )n (r3 , t3 )Gnn (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 )  0
(2.3)
0
 

pˆ12
i

    n  g n 0 (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )    r1  r2    t1  t2 

 t1 2mn

 
 0
pˆ12
i

    n  g   n (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )    r1  r2    t1  t2 

 t1 2mn

(2.4)
(2.5)
8
The functions g 0n (r1, t1; r2 , t2 ) and
differences r1  r2 , t1  t2 :
g n ( r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )
0
are functions of the
gn  (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  g n(0) (r1  r2 , t1  t2 ),
0
g n ( r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  g n ( r1  r2 , t1  t2 )
0
0
Then
g
 0
n
(r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   g
   n ( p) g
 0
n
 0
n
( , p)e
ip ( r1  r2 ) i ( t1 t2 )
d d 3 p
 2 
4
(2.6)
( , p)  1
g n0( r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   g n0( , p)eip ( r1 r2 )i (t1 t2 )
d d 3 p
 2 
4
,
   n ( p) g n0(, p)  1,
(2.7)
g n0( r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   g  0 n (r2 , t2 ; r1 , t1 )
With (2.7) the equation (2.4) takes the form
F  nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )    dr3dt3 g   n (r3 , t3 ; r1 , t1 )n (r3 , t3 )Gnn (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 )
0
To solve the system (2.6),(2.11) iteratively we write
and expand Gnm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 ) , F  nm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 ) in the form
Gnm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )  G
0
nm
(r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )   2G
2
nm
 nl
as
 nl
(r1, t1; r2 , t2 )  ...
F  nm (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )   F   nm (r1, t1; r2 , t2 )   3 F 
1
(2.8)
3
nm
(r1, t1; r2 , t2 )...
Substituting these forms into (1.21),(1.22) and associating equal
powers of  we have
9
F  (1) nn (r1 , t1; r2 , t2 )    dr3dt3 g 
0
n
(r3 , t3 ; r1 , t1 )n (r3 , t3 ) g (0) n (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 )
(2.9)
G (2) nm (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )    dr3dt3 g   n (r1 , t1 ; r3 , t3 )  n (r3 , t3 ) Fnn (1) (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t 2 ) 
0
  dr3dt3 g 
0
(r1 , t1 ; r3 , t3 ) n (r3 , t3 )  dr4 dt4 g   n (r4 , t 4 ; r3 , t3 ) n (r4 , t 4 ) g   n (r4 , t 4 ; r2 , t 2 ) 
0
n
  dr3dt3  dr4 dt4 g
 0
n
(r1 , t1 ; r3 , t3 ) n (r3 , t3 ) g
0
 0

n
(r4 , t4 ; r3 , t3 )  n (r4 , t 4 ) g
 0
n
(2.10)
(r4 , t 4 ; r2 , t 2 )
F  (3) nn (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )   dr3dt3 g   n (r3 , t3 ; r1 , t1 )n (r3 , t3 )G (2) nn (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 ) 
0
  dr3dt3  dr4 dt4  dr5 dt5 g  0 n (r3 , t3 ; r1 , t1 )  n (r3 , t3 ) g  0 n (r3 , t3 ; r4 , t4 ) 
 n (r4 , t4 ) g
 0

n
(r5 , t5 ; r4 , t4 )  n ( r5 , t5 ) g
 0
n
(2.11)
(r5 , t5 ; r2 , t2 )
Adding up the results (1.10), (2.9), (2.11) we obtain
n  r , t   i  Vnm F  mm (r , t ; r , t )  i  Vnm  F  (1) mm (r , t ; r , t )  F  (3) mm (r , t ; r , t )  
m
m
 i  Vnm  dr1dt1 g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r , t )m (r1 , t1 ) g (0) m ( r1 , t1; r , t ) 
m
i  Vnm  dr1dt1  dr2 dt2  dr3dt3 g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r , t )m (r1 , t1 )g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 ) 
(2.12)
m
 m (r2 , t2 ) g  0 m (r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 ) m (r3 , t3 ) g  0 m ( r3 , t3 ; r , t )
Let us denote
Wmn
obtains the form
elements of inverse matrix for Vnm  then (2.12)
10
W
mn
n
n (r , t )  i  dr1dt1 g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r , t )m (r1 , t1 ) g (0) m (r1 , t1; r , t ) 
i  dr1dt1  dr2 dt2  dr3dt3 g 
 m (r2 , t2 ) g 
0
m
0
m
(r1 , t1 ; r , t )m (r1 , t1 ) g 
(r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 ) m (r3 , t3 ) g 
We now expand
as follows
 m (r1 , t1 )
0
m
0
m
(r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 ) 
(2.13)
(r3 , t3 ; r , t )
in the first integral of the r.h.s. of eq. (2.13)
 m (r , t )
1  2  m (r , t )
 m (r1 , t1 )   m (r , t ) 
 x1  x  
 x1  x   x1  x  
x
2 x x
 (r , t )
 m
 t1  t 
t
(2.14)
where  x1 , x2 , x3   r .
In the second integral we take the m (r1 , t1 ) ,  m (r2 , t2 )  m (r3 , t3 ) just equal
to  m (r , t ) .
Using (2.14), we put eq. (2.13) in the following form
Wmn n (r , t )  Am m (r , t )  m
n
 m (r , t )
 2  m (r , t )
2
 Dm
 Bm  m (r , t )  m (r , t )
t
x x
(m  1, 2)
Where
Am  i  dr1dt1  g (0) m (r1 , t1 ; r , t ) 
2
 m  i  dr1dt1  t1  t   g m(0) (r1 , t1 ; r , t ) 
Dm  
(2.16)
2
2
i
(0)


dr
dt
x

x
x

x
g
(
r
,
t
;
r
,
t
)




1
1
1


1


m
1
1


2 
(2.17)
(2.18)
(2.15)
11
Bm  i  dr1dt1  dr2 dt2  dr3 dt3 g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r , t ) g  0 m (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 ) 
g 
0
m
(r3 , t3 ; r2 , t2 ) g 
0
m
(r3 , t3 ; r , t )
(2.19)
The eq.(2.15) is the Ginzburg-Landau equation for two-band
superconductor
2
 m (r , t )
2
   m ( r , t )
m
   Am nm  Wmn   n (r , t )  Dm
 Bm  m (r , t )  m (r , t )
t
x x
n 1,2
(2.20)
(m  1, 2)
or
1
1 (r , t )
 2 1 (r , t )
2
 ( A1  W11 )1 (r , t )  W12  2 (r , t )  D1
 B11 (r , t ) 1 (r , t )
t
x x
2
 2 (r , t )
2
   2 ( r , t )
2
 W211 (r , t )  ( A2  W22 ) 2 ( r , t )  D2
 B2  2 ( r , t )  2 ( r , t )
t
x x
Equations (2.21), (2.22) can be rewritten as
where
1
1
F
 ,
t
1
2
 2
F

t
 2
(2.21)
(2.22)
12
1
2
2
1
F   dr  W11  A1  1  W22  A2   2  W12 1 2  W212 1 
2
2
1  1 1 1   2 2 1
1
4
4 
 D1
 D2
 B1 1  B2  2 
2
x x 2
x x 4
4

is the GL functional.
3. The coefficients of the model.
At present section we derive the formulas for evaluation of the
coefficients Am ,  m , Dm , Bm . Since the functions g 0n (r1, t1; r2 , t2 ) are
functions of the differences r1  r2 , t1  t2 :
g n  (r1 , t1 ; r2 , t2 )  g n(0) (r1  r2 , t1  t2 ),
0
We obtain
0
0
Am  i  dr1dt1  g m   r1 , t1 ; r , t    i  dr1dt1  g m   r1  r , t1  t   
2
t
2

 i  dr1  dt1  g m 0  r1  r , t1  t    i  dr1  dt1  g m 0  r1  r , t1  t   
2

t
0
 i  dr1  d  g

 i  dr
where
0


2

m
 r1  r ,  
2

 i  dr1  d  g

m
 r1  r ,  
2

(3.1)
0

d  g m  r ,    i  dr  d  g m  r ,  
2
gm  r , t  , gm  r , t 
2
0
are the correlation functions which Fourier
transform is
e  i m ( p ) t
g ( p, t )  i   m ( p )
,
e
1
e  i m ( p ) t
g m ( p, t )  i  m ( p ) ,
e
1
1

k BT

m
(3.2)
13
and
dp

ipr
 f (r )   f ( p)e (2 )3

 f ( p )  f (r )e  ipr dr


Then
1
tanh(  m ( p))
 2m ( p) dp 
1
Am 
2(2 )3

3
2
3

D

1
tanh(  m )
2
 N m ( )d  m 
0
Nm  0
D
2k BTc
1
tanh(  ) 

2
0
Nm  0 
D
tm band,
D
d

2
where
(3.3)
m
 1 ,
3
Nm  0
2
 D
2

0
tanh x
dx
x
is the density of states at the Fermi surface of
is the Debye frequency. For most superconductors
where
Tc
is the critical temperature.
The integral (3.3) can be evaluated using
a
a
tanh x
ln x
0 x dx  tanh a  ln a  0 cosh 2 xdx
For
a  1
we obtain

tanh x
ln x
 
0 x dx  ln a  0 cosh 2 xdx  ln a  ln  4eC
a
with C
 0.577
Therefore
being the Euler constant[43].
 4eC a 


ln




  
m-
14
Am (T ) 
Nm  0
3
4
 2eC D 
ln 

  kBT 
(3.4)
The critical temperature of a two-band superconductor is
determined by the condition[15,17,18,19,20,21,27,33]
 A (T )  W11
det  1 c
 W21
W12

0
A2 (Tc )  W22 
(3.5)
The damping constants are
 m  i  dr1dt1  t1  t   g m(0) (r1 , t1 ; r , t )  
2
0
 i  dr1dt1  t1  t   g m   r1  r , t1  t   
2
t

 i  dr1  dt1  t1  t   g m 0  r1  r , t1  t    i  dr1  dt1  t1  t   g m 0  r1  r , t1  t   
2

2
t
0

 i  dr1  d  g m  r1  r ,    i  dr1  d  g m  r1  r ,   
2

 i  dr
 i 
0


2
0

d  g m  r ,    i  dr  d  g m  r ,   
2
2
0
0
dp
 2  
3

d  g m  p,    i 
2

dp
d  g  p,  
 2   
3

m
2
0
Using (3.2) we obtain
m  

i
4  2 
3
i 3 Nm  0
8
1

1

tanh   m  p  
tanh   m 
3
2
i


2

 ( m  p   i0)2 dp   4  N m ( ) ( m  i0)2 d  m 
 3 Nm  0
tanh x
dx

 ( x  i0)2 16kBTc
(3.6)
15
The diffusion constants are

Dn
2
i

2
 0


   drdtx x  g n (r , t )   
dp
2
4(2 )3  p p
 tanh(  n ( p)) 


  n ( p) 
The integral can be evaluated using

tanh x
 
x
n 
1
 
1 
x    n   
2 
 
2
2
After the substitution we find






2 
1


Dn  
 dp
2
4(2 )3 n   p p  2 2
1 
2
   n ( p)    n   
2 


 n ( p )  n ( p)

3


vF   vF 
p
p

3

dp

dp


2
3  
3
 
2
2 2
2(2 ) n 
2(2

)
n

 2 2


1
1
2
2 2
2
   n ( p)    n   
   n ( p)    n   
2  
2  




 3vF2 

6(2 )3
where

  dp
n 
vF 
we obtain
pF
mn
1
2
 2 2
1 
2


(
p
)


n



 
n
2  


2
is the Fermi velocity. Inserting
dp  (2 )3 N n ( )d 
[44]
16

Dn 


 3vF2  N n  0 

3
6

d


2 2
 2 2

1

2
     n   
2  


 2 vF2  N n  0 
dx

2 2
6
 2
1 
2
x    n   
2  


n  0
 2 vF2  N n  0 
3
6



n  0
7 2 vF2  N n  0 
24

3

n 

1

4 n  
2

3

3
 (3)  Dn
Here we use


n 0

Where  1z
n
  ( z)
1
1

n 
2

z
  2 z  1  ( z )
is the Riemann

function.
n 1
The Green’s function satisfies the anti-periodic boundary condition
0
0
g m   r1 , t1 ; r , t 
  g m   r1 , t1 ; r , t 
we express g m0 as Fourier series [45]
t 0
t  i 
1
g m   p, t  t   
0
1
e  
,

  z   m  p 
i
 iz t t 
(3.7)
 i
z 

where the sum is taken to run over all odd integers
  2n 1, n  Z  .If we then substitute (3.7) into the (2.19) we obtain
Bm 
1

  dp

 2Nm  0
1

8 2 N m  0 

 2
 
 m  p    2 


7 N m  0  3  3
1
3 2
 

3
2
4  k BT 
nZ  2n  1
2
2
2
3




d
 2 2 
0  2



 2 

2

17
4. The linearized model.
The equations (2.21), (2.22) are nonlinear differential equations of the
diffusion type to describe the space-time variation of the order parameters
near the critical temperature. The self consistent superconducting interaction
drives the order parameters towards its equilibrium values 1 ,  2 which are
the static uniform solution
0  ( A1  W11 )1  W12  2  B113
0  W211  ( A2  W22 ) 2  B2  32
For T  Tc we have 1   2  0 (symmetrical phase) while for T  Tc we
have 1 , 2   (unsymmetrical phase) where   1 
T
.In this section we
Tc
linearize our model about equilibrium: n  r , t   n  n  r , t  where n  r , t  is
the deviation of the order parameters from its real equilibrium value. In
the linear approximation n  r , t  satisfy the set of equations
1
  A1  W11  3B112 1  W122  D1 21
t

 2 2  W211   A2  W22  3B2  22 2  D2  22
t
1
(4.1)
where  2 is the Laplace operator. In a spatially homogeneous system the
eq.(4.1) takes the form
d (t )
  L( ) (t )
dt
(4.2)
 3B112  W11  A1

1  t  
1
where   t   
 , L( )  

W21
 2  t  

2



 .The general
2
3B2  2  W22  A2 

2

W12
1
solution of eq. (4.2) is
 (t )  C1u 1e ( )t  C2u  2e ( )t
1
2
(4.3)
18
where C1 , C2 are arbitrary constants , 1 ( ), 2   are eigenvalues of L  
and u 1 , u  2 are the corresponding eigenvectors .The system has two
relaxation times : 1  
1
1
, 2  
1
2
, (1  2 ) .The eq. (3.5) leads to
lim 1 ( )  0
 0
lim 2 ( )     0
 0
Thus, for t  2   1 the second term in (4.3) is negligible . We have
 (t )  C1u1e  ( ) t
(4.4)
1
t   1
where u
1
 u11 
  1  is a constant vector. It is readily checked that
 u  
 2 
1
1 (t )
u 
 11  const
2 (t ) t   u2
1
So the ratio
1 (t )
comes out to be time independent. Order parameters of a two 2 (t )
band superconductor are strongly correlated in the limit t   .Both order
parameters vary on the same time scale. This conclusion is in agreement with
[33].The motion of pairs in one band causes a change in another one .The first
subsystem follows adiabatically the second. We shall call this regime the
“adiabatic regime”.
If 1 ( ) is expanded in powers of  , within the GL accuracy we can put
1 ( )  const  .The largest relaxation time of the system is
1  
3
3



1
1
  , and 1   2 , 2   2 .
 .Thus, in this approximation
t
t
t
1 ( ) 
5. The nonlinear model in adiabatic regime.
Our goal is to obtain the set of decoupled
recall [33] that in the one-band GL equation
equations for 1 ,  2 .We now
19


2
 a  b   D 2 
t
all terms are of the same order with respect to
 : a   1 , b   0 ,    2 ,  t   1 ,  2   2  
1
where  is the coherence length.
Following [33] we express  2 from eq.(2.21) and substitute the result in
3
eq. (2.22), keeping only terms up to order  2 :

1
2
 a1  b11 1  K  2 1
t
(5.1)
with
  1 ( A2  W22 )   2 ( A1  W11 ),
a  ( A1  W11 )( A2  W22 )  W12W21 ,
K  D1 ( A2  W22 )  D2 ( A1  W11 ), b1  B1 ( A2  W22 ) 
B2 ( A1  W11 )3
W122
 2 1
is neglected.
t 2
The term with
Similarly, one obtains an equation for  2 :

 2
2
 a 2  b2  2  2  K  2  2
t
with b2  B2 ( A1  W11 ) 
(5.2)
B1 ( A2  W22 )3
.Within the GL accuracy a  k , k  0 .
W212
We obtain upon dividing by a of both equations (5.1),(5.2) :


 1  1 (1  1 2 )   2 2 1 ,
t
1
2


 2   2 (1  2 2 )   2 2  2
t
2
2
(5.3)
20

where   
a

a
a
K
K
, 1 
.
, 2 

a
k
b1
b2
The ratio


is the largest relaxation time of the system,
k
1  2

  satisfies the equation
1  2

2
  (1   )   2 2 
t
(5.4)
The two TDGL equations for the two-band case are reduced to a single
equation for the normalized order parameter  ( r , t ) .
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to J.Berger, V. Zhuravlev for useful discussions and help.
References
[1] A.Schmid, Phys. Kondens.Mater. 5, 302 (1966).
[2] E.Abrahms, T.Tsuneto, Phys.Rev. 152, 416 (1966).
[3] C.Caroli, K.Maki, Phys.Rev. 159, 306 (1967), Phys.Rev. 159, 316
(1967).
[4] L.P.Gor’kov, G.M.Eliashberg, Sov.Phys.,JETP 27,328 (1968).
[5] J.W.F.Woo, E.Abrahms, Phys.Rev. 169, 407 (1968).
[6] G.M.Eliashberg, Sov.Phys.,JETP 29,1298 (1969).
21
[7] A.Houghton, K.Maki, Phys.Rev. B 3, 1625 (1971).
[8] C.R.Hu, R.S.Thompson, Phys.Rev. B 6, 110 (1972).
[9] M.Cyrot, Rep.Prog.Phys. 36, 103 (1973).
[10] L.Kramer, R.J.Watts-Tobin, Phys.Rev.Lett. 40, 1041 (1978).
[11] A.Levchenko, A.Kamenev, arXiv:1101.4599v1.
[12] X X Xi, Rep.Prog.Phys. 71, 1 (2008).
[13] V.A.Moskalenko, Fiz.Met.Metalloved, 8,503 (1959).
[14] H. Suhl, B.T. Matthias, L.R. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 552
(1959).
[15] A.E.Koshelev, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:cond-mat/0211388.
[16] A.Gurevich, V.M.Vinokur, arXiv: cond-mat/0207559.
[17] A.Gurevich, arXiv: cond-mat/0212129.
[18] A.A.Golubov, A.E.Koshelev, arXiv:cond-mat/0303237.
[19] A.E.Koshelev, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:cond-mat/0401339.
[20] M.E.Zhitomirsky, V.-H.Dao, Phys.Rev. B 69, 054508 (2004).
[21] A.E.Koshelev,A.A.Varlamov, V.M.Vinokur, Phys.Rev. B 72,
064523 (2005).
[22] A.Gurevich, arXiv: cond-mat/0701281.
[23] K.Tanaka, M.Eschrig,D.F.Agterberg, arXiv: condmat/0702270v2.
22
[24] A.Levchenko, A.Kamenev, arXiv: 0706.2884.
[25] K.Tanaka,M.Eschrig, arXiv:0809.3989.
[26] O.V.Dolgov, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:0803.1103.
[27] O.V.Dolgov,I.I.Mazin,D.Parker, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:0810.1476.
[28] V.G.Kogan, C.Martin, R.Prozorov, arXiv: 0905.0029.
[29] J.Carlstrom, E.Babaev, M.Speight, arXiv: 1009.2196.
[30] E.Babaev, J.Carlstrom, arXiv: 1007.1965.
[31] E.Babaev, J.Carlstrom, M.Speight, arXiv: 0910.1607.
[32] M.Silaev, E.Babaev, arXiv:1102.5734.
[33] V.G.Kogan, J.Schmalian, Phys.Rev. B 83, 054515 (2011).
[34] J.Carlstrom,J.Garaud, E.Babaev, arXiv:1101.4599.
[35] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv:cond-mat/0305496.
[36] V.A.Moskalenko, M.E.Palistrant, V.M.Vakalyuk , arXiv:condmat/0309671.
[37] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv:cond-mat/0312302.
[38] M.E.Palistrant, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:cond-mat/0602551.
[39] M.E.Palistrant, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:cond-mat/0611275.
23
[40] M.E.Palistrant,I.D.Cebotari, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:0811.0897.
[41] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv:1008.4833.
[42] Shi-Zeng Lin,Xiao Hu, arXiv:1007.1940.
[43] I. S. Gradshteyn , I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and
Products, Academic Press, New York (1980).
[44] N.Kopnin, Theory of nonequilibrium superconductivity, Oxford
University Press , Oxford (2001).
[45] L.P.Kadanoff, G.Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics,
W.A.Benjamin, New York (1962).