1 Kinetic Equations for a Dirty Two-Band Superconductor
V.L.OSTROVSKI
ORT Braude College, Karmiel 21982, Israel
E-mail: vostrovs@braude.ac.il
Abstract
Green’s function techniques for studying nonequilibrium processes in
dirty two-band superconductors are discussed. Perturbation expansions
and Green’s function equations are developed. A time dependent
modification of the Usadel equation is given.
Introduction.
The time dependent Gorkov equation has proven to be very
successful in the theory of superconductivity [1-11]. The usual
description of superconductivity characterizes states by a onecomponent order parameter. However the properties of some
compounds (e.g. MgB2 , Nb2 Se , V3 Si ) are described by a two-band model
[12] with a two- component order parameter. The two-gap model (the
two gaps arise from the existence of two bands) was proposed [13, 14] at
the dawn of superconductivity theory. The interest in the two-gap
model has recently been renewed after the discovery of
superconductivity in magnesium diboride[15-42] . The following study
is based on a set of kinetic equations for the order parameters of a twoband system. We focus our attention mainly at the overlapping of energy
bands on the Fermi surface, and effects of impurities. The theory of dirty
two-band superconductivity has been developed within Matsubara
formalism [15, 17, 19, 32, 43-46].
In this paper we develop the quasiclassical Keldysh-Usadel model for
multi-band superconductors, following the real-time formalism [47-50].
2 1. Green’s functions in the Nambu-Keldysh representation
The two-band pairing Hamiltonian in the BCS theory, ignoring
impurity scattering, is given by
Hˆ  Hˆ 0  Hˆ int
(1.1)
Where




Hˆ 0   d 3r ˆ n (r )hn (r , t )ˆ n (r )
(1.2)
n
is the Hamiltonian of noninteracting quasiparticles,
 
2


1 
i r  eA  r , t    e  r , t      n 
hn (r , t ) 


2mn
,  is the chemical potential
, n  1, 2 are the band indexes, mn is the effective mass,  n  is the

lowest energy level in the n -th band, A,  are potentials of external
electromagnetic field and ˆ n ,ˆ n are the creation and annihilation
field operators in the Heisenberg representation for quasiparticles in
band n with spin   or  .


 d r    r ˆ
Hˆ int  
3
n
n

n





(r )ˆ n (r )  n  r ˆ n (r )ˆ n (r )  ,



 n  r    Vnm ˆ m (r )ˆ m (r ) ,
(1.3)
m



 n  r    Vnm ˆ m  (r )ˆ m  (r )
m
is the Hamiltonian of pairing interaction,
function of the n-th band ,
V11 , V22

 n  r , t 
is the gap
are the constants of intraband
3 interaction, V12 ,V21 are the constants of interband interaction
(Vnm  Vmn ) .The model assumes the formation of Cooper pairs in each band
and the tunneling of these pairs as a whole from one band into another.
The equations of motion in the Heisenberg picture are

 
2
ˆ n (r , t )  1




i

i r  eA  r , t      n ˆ n (r , t )   n  r , t ˆ n (r , t )
t
 2mn



(1.4)
(for the spin-up component)

 
2
ˆ n (r , t )  1




i

i r  eA  r , t      n ˆ n (r , t )  n  r , t ˆ n (r , t ) (1.5)
t
 2mn



(for the spin-down component)
We introduce Nambu’s pseudo-spinor field

  n1  r , t  

n r ,t   
  ,
 n2  r , t  




 n1  r , t   ˆ n  r , t  ,  n 2  r , t   ˆ n  r , t 
(1.6)
with anti-commutation rules
  r, t  ,   r ', t '    r, t    r ', t '    r ', t '   r, t  
n

m
n

m

m
 
  nm    r  r '    t  t '  ,




 n  r , t  ,  m  r ', t '    n  r , t  ,   m  r ', t '  0
n
4 The Hamiltonian of the system in Nambu’s representation is
H





  dr   r , t   Hˆ  r , t   ˆ  r , t     r , t  ,

n
n 1,2
0
n
n


 hn  r , t 


0
0
n  r , t  


ˆ
ˆ
H0 r , t   
 ,  r ,t     

0 
 h n  r , t   n
 0
  n r ,t 
(1.7)
The contour-ordered Green’s function is defined by
 


Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '   i Tct   n  r , t    n  r ', t '   
where
ct
(1.8)
is the Schwinger-Keldysh closed time path contour  49
The greater Green’s function is
 


Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '   i   n  r , t    n  r ', t '   




  n  r , t   n  r ', t ' 
 n  r , t  n  r ', t '
 i 


    r , t    r ', t ' 
  n  r , t  n  r ', t '
n
n





(1.9)
The lesser Green’s function is then
 


Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '  i    n  r , t   n  r ', t '   




   n  r ', t '  n  r , t 
 n  r ', t ' n  r , t 
 i


    r ', t '    r , t 
 n  r ', t '  n  r , t 
n
n





We define the retarded and advanced Green’s functions
(1.10)
5  
 
 
Gˆ nR  r , t ; r ', t '    t  t ' Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '  Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '  ,
(1.11)
 
 
 
Gˆ nA  r , t ; r ', t '    t ' t  Gˆ n  r , t; r ', t '  Gˆ n  r , t; r ', t '  ,
the Keldysh Green’s function
 
 
 
Gˆ nK  r , t ; r ', t '  Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '  Gˆ n  r , t ; r ', t '
and the
4 4
(1.12)
triagonal matrix Green’s function
 
 
 Gˆ nR  r , t ; r ', t '  Gˆ nK  r , t ; r ', t '  
 

Gn  r , t ; r ', t '   
ˆ A  r , t ; r ', t '  

G
0
n


The non-equilibrium Dyson equations for the matrix Green’s function
become
 
 
 
(G 10 n  Gn )  r , t ; r ', t '    r  r '    t  t '   ( n  Gn )  r , t ; r ', t ' 
 
 
 
(Gn  G0n1 )  r , t ; r ', t '     r  r '    t  t '  (Gn   n )  r , t ; r ', t ' 
(1.13)
Where we have introduced the inverse free matrix Green’s function
 

 
G 10 n  r , t ; r ', t '  G 10 n  r , t    r  r '    t  t '  ,
  2



1 
 3

G 10 n  r , t   i 3 

ie
A
 r , t   e  r , t      n ,


t 2mn  r


 3
(1.14)
 3 0  3  1 0 

,  

3
 0 1 
0  
The
4 4
matrix
 ˆ nR ˆ nK 
n  

 0 ˆ A 
n

is the self-energy matrix. The operator
has the effect of integrating over the space and time coordinates

6 and performing matrix multiplication when applied between two
matrices:
 

 


 A  B   ij  r , t ; r , t     dr  dt  Aik  r , t ; r , t   Bkj  r , t ; r , t  
k
Subtracting equations (1.13) we obtain the left-right Dyson equation

 1



G
, Gn   0
n
n
0


where
(1.15)
  
 A , B   A  B  B  A .

Still ignoring impurity scattering,


 ˆ n  r , t 
0 


r
0
,t




n
 , ˆ n  r , t     
 n  r , t     n  r , t   pairing  


 0
0 
ˆ n  r , t  
  n  r , t 

(1.16)
The pairing potential is defined as



 
i
 n  r    Vnm ˆ m (r )ˆ m (r )   Vnm  lim Tr  1  i 2  Gˆ nK  r , t ; r ', t '   ,
r
t
r
t

',
'
,




2 m
m
 0 1  2  0 i 
 
 ,  

1 0
i 0 
(1.17)
1
2. The Eilenberg equations
Eilenberg derived transportlike equations for one-band superconductor
[51,49,50].We would like to obtain transportlike equations for a
two-band superconductor. To derive the quantum kinetic equation we
introduce the mixed (Wigner) coordinates
7  r  r   
R
,   r  r ,
2
t  t
,  t  t ,
T
2




 
  

 
Aij  r , t ; r , t    Aij  R  , T  ; R  , T    Aij R, T ;  , 
2
2
2
2


(2.1)

and then define a Fourier transform






Aij R, T ;  ,    dp  dEe  iE eip Aij R, T ; p, E




(2.2)
If the derivatives are small, we need to take only the first order
approximation of the commutator



   




A
,
B
R
,
T
;
p
,
E
(
A
B
B
A
)
R
, T ; p, E   A, B  



i
 T A,  E B   E A, T B    R A,  p B   p A,  R B 

2






(2.3)
where  A, B stands for the anticommutator.
Taking into account impurity scattering, the Dyson equation (1.15)
can be written as

  2
  3 


1  
 3
,
,
ie

A
r
t
e

r
t




















i
n
n pairing
n imp , Gn   0


t 2mn  r


 
(2.4)
where the impurity self-energy  n imp includes contributions from
both spin-flip and spin-independent elastic scattering
  n imp    n 0   n sf
Without external fields equation (2.1) can be written as
8 
  3 

1 2
i
















n
n pairing
n imp , Gn   0
2
t 2mn r


(2.5)
The elastic contribution to the self-energy can be written as




2

dp ¢ unm ( p - p ¢) Gm ( p )
(Sn )0 ( p) = N imp mS
=1,2 ò
Here
unm
(2.6)
is the matrix element of impurity potential, and
number of impurities per unit volume. We assume that
independent of the magnitude of

(Sn )0 ( p) = Nimp N 0 S
m=1,2
Where
N0
ò de
d W p ¢

p¢
4p

p
Nimp

u ( p) is
the
, so that
2

unm ( pˆ ⋅ pˆ ¢) Gm ( p )
(2.7)
is the density of states at the Fermi energy, and
element of solid angle in momentum space,
p̂
d W p
is an
is the unity vector in the
direction of p . Defining the elastic scattering rate
1
t nm
in the Born
approximation by
d W p ¢
2
1
= 2p N imp N 0 ò
unm ( pˆ ⋅ pˆ ¢)
4p
t nm
(2.8)
we can write

(Sn )0 ( p) = mS
=1,2
1
2pt nm
ò de G

p
m

( p)
(2.9)
Similarly, for the contribution from spin-flip scattering due to magnetic
impurities one obtains
9 
(Sn )sf ( p) = mS
=1,2
1
2p (t nm ) sf
ò de t

p
 3
Gm ( p )t ( )
(3)
(2.10)
where
1
= 2p N magn.imp N 0 s ( s + 1) ò
(t nm ) sf
N magn.imp
4p
unm ( pˆ ⋅ pˆ ¢)
2
is the number of magnetic impurities per unit volume,
spin of the impurity,
band,
d W p ¢
1
( n ¹ m)
t nm
1
t nn
(2.11)
s
is the
is the intraband scattering rate within the n-th
is the interband scattering rate. Converting the left hand
side (2.5) to relative coordinates, and using (2.3), we obtain

é t (3) E + (S )
ù
é
ù

n pairing , Gn ú + ivFn ⋅¶ R Gn - ê(S n )0 + (S n )sf , Gn ú = 0
ëê
ûë
û-
(2.12)
where vFn is the Fermi velocity in the n-th band. We define the
quasiclassical Green's functions

 
i
g n R, pˆ , t , t ¢ = ò d e p Gn R, p, t , t ¢
p
(
)
(
)
(2.13)
Written in terms of quasiclassical Green's functions the equation (2.12)
becomes

é t (3) E + (S )
ù
é
ù

n pairing , g n ú + ivFn ⋅¶ R g n - ê(s n )0 + (s n )sf , g n ú = 0
êë
ûë
û-
(2.14)
where
(sn )0 = - mS
=1,2
and
i
( g m ) aver
2t mn
(2.15)
10 (sn )sf = - mS
=1,2
i
2 (t mn )sf
t ( ) ( g m ) aver t ( )
3
(2.16)
3
The subscript ''aver'' to the quasiclassical Green's functions denotes that
they are averaged over all angles of momentum. Equation (2.14) is
Eilenberg's equation for two-band superconductors.
3. The Usadel equation
For a dirty superconductor, a short mean-free path makes the theory
simple, since the motion of the electrons is always nearly isotropic [52,
49, 50].
Using
 Gˆ R Gˆ nK 
Gn   n

 0 Gˆ A 
n

æ gˆ R
g n = ççç n
çè 0
and (2.12) we get
gˆ nK ö÷
÷÷
gˆ nA ÷ø
(3.1)
where gˆ nR , gˆ nA , gˆ nK are 2´ 2 matrices. Normalization condition for the
quasiclassical Green's functions is
g n g n = t (0) ,
æt 0
t (0) = ççç
èç 0
0 ö÷ 0 çæ1 0ö÷
÷÷ , t = çç0 1÷÷÷
è
ø
t 0 ø÷
Equation (3.2) is equivalent to the three
(3.2)
2´ 2
matrix equations
gˆ nR gˆ nR = t 0
(3.3)
gˆ nA gˆ nA = t 0
(3.4)
gˆ nR gˆ nK + gˆ nK gˆ nA = 0
(3.5)
11 From Eilenberg's equation (2.14) we obtain
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ R ù + iv ⋅¶  gˆ R - ésˆ R , gˆ R ù = 0
n
n ú
Fn
êë n n úû R n
ëê
û-
(3.6)
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ A ù + iv ⋅¶  gˆ A - ésˆ A , gˆ A ù = 0
n
n ú
Fn
êë
R n
ëê n n ûú û-
(3.7)
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ K ù + iv ⋅¶  gˆ K - sˆ R gˆ K - sˆ K gˆ A + gˆ R sˆ K + gˆ K sˆ A = 0
n
n ú
Fn
n n
n
n
n n
n n
R n
ëê
û-
(3.8)
where
æsˆ R
sn = (sn )0 + (sn )sf = ççç n
çè 0
sˆ nK ö÷
÷÷ .
sˆ nA ÷ø
Here
sˆ nR , sˆ nA , sˆ nK
are
2´ 2
matrices. If
elastic impurity scattering is strong the motion of electrons is not
ballistic, but diffusive. It makes sense to average the self-energy and
Green's functions over the directions of the momentum. In the dirty
limit, the quasiclassical Green's function will be almost isotropic , and
an expansion in spherical harmonics needs only keep the s- and p-wave
parts
ˆ np ,
g n = g ns + pg
(3.9)
sn = (sn )0 + (sn ) sf = sns + pˆ snp
The assumption is that
g np  g ns , snp  sns
.Substituting eq. (3.9) into the
(2.15), (2.16), we obtain
i
i
3
3
g ms - S
t ( ) g ms t ( )
m=1,2 2t
m=1,2 2 (t
mn
mn )sf
(3.10)
é 1
i
1 ùú
S êê
g mp
2 m=1,2 ëê t mn (t mn )tr úûú
(3.11)
sns = - S
snp = -
where (t nm )tr is the impurity transport relaxation time
12 1
(t nm )tr
= 2p N imp N 0 ò
d W p ¢
4p
unm ( pˆ ⋅ pˆ ¢) (1- pˆ ⋅ pˆ ¢)
2
(3.12)
Inserting (3.9) into Eilenberg's equation we obtain
é t (3) E + (S )
ù
ù
ˆ é (3)
ˆ 
ˆ
n pairing , g ns ú + p ê t E + (S n ) pairing , g np ú + ivFn p ⋅¶ R ( g ns + pg np )
êë
ûë
û-[sns , g ns ]- - pˆ éëêsns , g np ùûú - éëêsnp , g ns ùûú - pˆ ⋅ pˆ éëêsnp , g np ùûú = 0
-
(3.13)
Equation (3.13) for the dirty limit can be split into even and odd parts
with respect to momentum
é t (3) E + (S )
ù
ˆ ˆ 
n pairing , g ns ú + ivFn ( p ⋅ p )¶ R g np
ëê
ûi
i
g ms , g ns ]- + S
[
m=1,2 2t
m=1,2 2 (t
mn
mn )sf
( m¹ n )
+ S
ét (3) g t (3) , g ù = 0
ms
ns ú
êë
û-
(3.14)
and
i
1
é t (3) E + (S )
ù
é g mp , g ns ù = 0

å
n pairing , g np ú + ivFn ¶ R g ns êë
ûú û2 m=1,2 (t mn ) ëê
(3.15)
tr
Averaging eq. (3.14) over all directions of momentum gives
i
é t (3) E + (S )
ù

n pairing , g ns ú + vFn ¶ R g np
ëê
û- 3
i
i
ét (3) g t (3) , g ù = 0
[ g ms , g ns ]- + mS
ms
ns ú
ëê
û=1,2 2 (t
m=1,2 2t
mn
mn )sf
( m¹ n )
+ S
(3.16)
If elastic scattering is strong, the energy of impurity scattering is much
larger than any energy in the problem so that the first term in the
equation (3.15) can be neglected compared to the third and we obtain
ivFn¶ R g ns -
i
1
é g mp , g ns ù = 0
å
ûú 2 m=1,2 (t mn )tr ëê
Equation (3.17) can be rewriten in the following form
(3.17)
13 ivFn¶ R g ns -
i 1 é
i
1
é g mp , g ns ùú = 0
g np , g ns ùúû - å
ê
ë
û2 (t nn )tr
2 m=1,2 (t mn )tr êë
(3.18)
( m¹ n )
From the normalization condition (3.2) we also obtain
g ns g ns = t (0) ,
(3.19)
g ns g np + g np g ns = 0
Upon inserting into (3.18), we get
iln¶ R g ns + ig ns g np -
(t nn )tr é
i
g mp , g ns ùûú = 0
å
2 m=1,2 (t mn ) tr ëê
(3.20)
( m¹ n )
where
ln = vFn (t nn )tr
is the impurity mean free path in the n-th band.
Within the model of weak interband impurity scattering
(t nn )tr  (t mn )tr , Eq. (3.20) takes the simple form g ns g np = -ln¶ R g ns .
Multiplying this equation by
obtain
g ns
on the left and using Eq. (3.19) we
g np = -ln g ns ¶ R g ns
(3.21)
Putting this into Eq. (3.16) we obtain
é t (3) E + (S )
ù


n pairing , g ns ú - iDn ¶ R ( g ns ¶ R g ns )
êë
ûi
i
ét (3) g t (3) , g ù = 0
+ S
[ g ms , g ns ]- + mS
ms
ns ú
ëê
ûm=1,2 2t
=1,2 2 (t
mn
mn )sf
( m¹ n )
where
Dn = (1/ 3) ln vFn
(3.22)
is the diffusion coefficient. The Eq. (3.22) is the
system of coupled Usadel's equations in which all microscopic details
are hidden in the diffusion coefficients for each Fermi surface sheet and
the interband scattering rates 1/ t mn (m ¹ n) . Ignoring spin-flip scattering,
eq. (3.22) can be written
14 i
é t (3) E + (S )
ù


[ g ms , g ns ]- = 0
n pairing , g ns ú - iDn ¶ R ( g ns ¶ R g ns ) + S
êë
m=1,2 2t
ûmn
( m¹ n )
Representing
æ gˆ R
g ns = ççç ns
çè 0
g ns
(3.23)
as a matrix
gˆ nsK ö÷
÷÷ ,
gˆ nsA ÷ø
(3.24)
Eq. (3.23) becomes
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ R ù - iD ¶  ( gˆ R ¶  gˆ R ) = 0
n
ns ú
n R
ns R ns
ëê
û-
(3.25)
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ A ù - iD ¶  ( gˆ A ¶  gˆ A ) = 0
n
ns ú
n R
ns R ns
êë
û-
(3.26)
é Et 3 + D
ˆ , gˆ K ù - iD ¶  ( gˆ R ¶  gˆ K + gˆ K ¶  gˆ A )
n
ns ú
n R
ns R ns
ns R ns
êë
ûi
+ S
( gˆ msR gˆ nsK + gˆ msK gˆ nsA - gˆ nsR gˆ msK - gˆ nsK gˆ msA ) = 0
m=1,2 2t
mn
( m¹ n )
(3.27)
The system of equations (3.25)-(3.27) is the "dirty limit" of the system
(3.6)-(3.8).This system of differential equations must be supplemented
by a proper boundary conditions. For unbounded superconductor one
has match the equilibrium solution at large distances. To solve the
equations for bounded superconductor one needs some boundary
conditions at surfaces and interfaces which are in general partially
transparent. The boundary transparency of quasiparticles from different
bands is important parameter. An extended discussion of the reflection
and transmission processes at surfaces of two-band superconductor will
be given elsewhere.
In conclusion, in this paper we developed kinetic equations for twoband dirty superconductor using the real-time technique.
15 We would like to thank Prof. J.Berger for his support of the present
work. This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation,
grant No\249/10.
References
[1] A.Schmid, Phys. Kondens.Mater. 5, 302 (1966).
[2] E.Abrahms, T.Tsuneto, Phys.Rev. 152, 416 (1966).
[3] C.Caroli, K.Maki, Phys.Rev. 159, 306 (1967), Phys.Rev. 159, 316
(1967).
[4] L.P.Gor’kov, G.M.Eliashberg, Sov.Phys.,JETP 27,328 (1968).
[5] J.W.F.Woo, E.Abrahms, Phys.Rev. 169, 407 (1968).
[6] G.M.Eliashberg, Sov.Phys.,JETP 29,1298 (1969).
[7] A.Houghton, K.Maki, Phys.Rev. B 3, 1625 (1971).
[8] C.R.Hu, R.S.Thompson, Phys.Rev. B 6, 110 (1972).
[9] M.Cyrot, Rep.Prog.Phys. 36, 103 (1973).
[10] L.Kramer, R.J.Watts-Tobin, Phys.Rev.Lett. 40, 1041 (1978).
[11] A.Levchenko, A.Kamenev, arXiv:1101.4599v1.
[12] X X Xi, Rep.Prog.Phys. 71, 1 (2008).
[13] V.A.Moskalenko, Fiz.Met.Metalloved, 8,503 (1959).
[14] H. Suhl, B.T. Matthias, L.R. Walker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 552
(1959).
[15] A.E.Koshelev, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:cond-mat/0211388v1.
16 [16] A.Gurevich, V.M.Vinokur, arXiv: cond-mat/0207559.
[17] A.Gurevich, arXiv: cond-mat/0212129v1.
[18] A.A.Golubov, A.E.Koshelev, arXiv:cond-mat/0303237.
[19] A.E.Koshelev, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:cond-mat/0401339v1.
[20] M.E.Zhitomirsky, V.-H.Dao, Phys.Rev. B 69, 054508 (2004).
[21] A.E.Koshelev,A.A.Varlamov, V.M.Vinokur, Phys.Rev. B 72,
064523 (2005).
[22] A.Gurevich, arXiv: cond-mat/0701281.
[23] K.Tanaka, M.Eschrig,D.F.Agterberg, arXiv: cond-mat/0702270v2.
[24] A.Levchenko, A.Kamenev, arXiv: 0706.2884.
[25] K.Tanaka,M.Eschrig, arXiv:0809.3989.
[26] O.V.Dolgov, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:0803.1103.
[27] O.V.Dolgov,I.I.Mazin,D.Parker, A.A.Golubov, arXiv:0810.1476.
[28] V.G.Kogan, C.Martin, R.Prozorov, arXiv: 0905.0029.
[29] J.Carlstrom, E.Babaev, M.Speight, arXiv: 1009.2196.
[30] E.Babaev, J.Carlstrom, arXiv: 1007.1965.
[31] E.Babaev, J.Carlstrom, M.Speight, arXiv: 0910.1607.
17 [32] M.Silaev, E.Babaev, arXiv:1102.5734v1.
[33] V.G.Kogan, J.Schmalian, Phys.Rev. B 83, 054515 (2011).
[34] J.Carlstrom,J.Garaud, E.Babaev, arXiv:1101.4599.
[35] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv:cond-mat/0305496.
[36] V.A.Moskalenko, M.E.Palistrant, V.M.Vakalyuk , arXiv:condmat/0309671.
[37] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv:cond-mat/0312302.
[38] M.E.Palistrant, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:cond-mat/0602551.
[39] M.E.Palistrant, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:cond-mat/0611275.
[40] M.E.Palistrant,I.D.Cebotari, V.A.Ursu, arXiv:0811.0897.
[41] M.E.Palistrant, arXiv: 1008.4833.
[42] Shi-Zeng Lin, Xiao Hu, arXiv: 1007.1940.
[43] W.Belzig, F.K.Wilhelm, C.Bruder, G.Shon, A.D.Zaikin,
arXiv:cond-mat/9812297v2
[44]A.A.Golubov, A.E.Koshelev, arXiv: 1009.3517v2.
[45] H. Kusunose, T. M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, arXiv: condmat/0208113v2.
[46] H. Kusunose, arXiv: cond-mat/0401077v3.
[47] L.V.Keldysh, Sov. Phys. - JETP, v.20, 1018 (1965).
18 [48] A.I.Larkin, Yu.N.Ovchinnikov, Sov. Phys. - JETP, v.41, 960
(1976).
[49] J.Rammer, Quantum field theory of non-equilibrium states,
Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[50] K.H.Bennemann, J.B.Ketterson (editors), Superconductivity,
Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[51] G.Eilenberg, Z.Phys. , v. 214,195, (1968)
[52] K.Usadel, Phys.Rev.Lett. , v.25, 507, (1970)