Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium In the previous three chapters, we examined the energy levels of various gaseous, liquid, and solid materials, and discussed the spontaneous radiative properties associated with transitions between those levels. Radiation rates were described in terms of transition probabilities and relative oscillator strengths of the transitions. In this chapter, we will consider the collective properties of a large number of radiative atoms or molecules. This will lead to the concept of radiation in thermodynamic equilibrium, from which we can deduce the principles of stimulated emission. Many of the concepts discussed in this chapter were introduced in PC344. You may wish to review your notes from that course. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Outline Table of Contents 1 Equilibrium 2 Radiating Bodies Stefan-Boltzmann Law Wien’s Law 3 Cavity Radiation Counting the Number of Cavity Modes Rayleigh-Jeans Formula Planck’s Law for Cavity Radiation Relation between Cavity and Blackbody Radiation 4 Absorption and Stimulated Emission The Principle of Detailed Balance Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Equilibrium Thermal Equilibrium §6.1 In the study of thermodynamics, thermal equilibrium describes the case where each individual mass within a closed system has the same temperature. If two masses (M1 and M2) with different temperatures (T1 and T2) are brought into close proximity, they will after some time reach the same temperature, somewhere between T1 and T2. The duration of time over which this temperature change occurs can range over orders of magnitude, depending on the thermal properties of the masses and the intervening medium. The transfer of thermal energy occurs by one or more of three processes: conduction, convection, and radiation (Fig. 1). The only one of these that is relevant to understanding laser operation is radiation, so we will ignore the other two processes in this course. It should be noted however, that conduction (and to a lesser extent convection) are critically important in the actual engineering of lasers, as they produce a large amount of waste heat. Fig. 1: Examples of energy transfer via (a) conduction, (b) convection, and (c) radiation - see WTS Fig. 6-1 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Radiating Bodies §6.2 In Fig. 1(c), if we remove all of the air from the space between M1 and M2, then there is no material contact between the bodies. In this case, radiation is the only process that will bring the two masses into equilibrium. For this process to occur, the masses must be capable of radiating energy, and each must be capable of absorbing radiation from the other body. If a collection of atoms is at temperature T then, by the Boltzmann equation, the probability distribution function fi that any atom has an energy Ei is given by fi (Ei ) = C1 gi e −Ei /kT . (6.1) −5 Here, k = 8.6164 × 10 eV/K is Boltzmann’s constant and gi is the statistical weight of level i , the number of states that have the same energy (refer back to the end of chapter 3). The term C1 is a normalizing constant that is the same for all energy levels, and is determined by the constraint that X X fi = C1 gi e −Ei /kT = 1 (6.2) i i (meaning that the atom must exist in one of the i energy levels). If N is the total number of atoms per unit volume of this atomic species and Ni is the population P density occupying a specific energy level i , then i Ni = N , indicating that Ni can be expressed as Ni = fi N = C1 gi e −Ei /kT N . Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Radiating Bodies cont’ §6.2 In the case of a high-density (i.e. solid) material, the energy levels are usually continuously distributed. Exceptions to this guideline are ion-doped insulators which we will encounter frequenctly in PC482 - and quantum-confined semiconductors. For continuously-distributed energy levels, the distribution function is expressed as a probability per unit energy, g (E ), such that the probability of finding a fraction of that material excited to a specific energy E within an infinitesimal “slice” dE along the energy axis is g (E )dE = C2 e −E /kT dE , (6.3) where we have ignored the statistical weights for reasons that will be explained shortly. As before, the constant C2 exists to normalize the probability distribution: Z ∞ Z ∞ g (E )dE = C2 e −E /kT dE = 1. (6.4) 0 0 Using this relation, it is easy to show that C2 = 1/kT , and thus g (E ) = 1 −E /kT . e kT (6.5) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Radiating Bodies cont’ §6.2 Again, if N is the number of atoms per unit volume in the solid, and if we refer to the number of atoms per unit volume within an infinitesimal R ∞ energy range dE as N (E ), then the normalization condition requires that N = 0 N (E )dE . The number of atoms at energy E within an energy range dE is then N (E )dE = N −E /kT dE . e kT (6.6) It is fundamental in laser studies to know the ratio of population densities (number of particles per unit volume) that exist at two specific energy levels. For discrete energy levels, the ratio of densities at the upper energy level Eu and lower energy level Eℓ is expressed as gu −(Eu −Eℓ )/kT gu −∆Euℓ /kT Nu e = e , = Nℓ gℓ gℓ ∆E u ℓ = E u − E ℓ . (6.7) Similarly, for continuous energy distributions, N (Eu )dE = e −∆Euℓ /kT . N (Eℓ )dE (6.8) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Radiating Bodies cont’ §6.2 These two formulae for population density ratio are identical except for the ratio of the statistical weights, gu /gℓ . In dense materials, there are so many energy sublevels within small ranges of energy that the statistical weights for most levels are essentially the same; thus, they would cancel out when taking the ratio. To summarize, when a collection of atoms are assembled together and brought to equilibrium, not only will the kinetic energies related to their motion be in thermal equilibrium, but the distribution of their internal energies associated with the specific energy levels they occupy will also be in thermal equilibrium. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Stefan-Boltzmann Law §6.2 The Stefan-Boltzmann Law states that the total radiated intensity (W/m2 ) emitted from a body at temperature T is proportional to the fourth power of the temperature: I = eM σT 4 , (6.9) where σ = 5.67 × 10−8 Wm−2 K−4 and eM is the emissivity that is specific to the radiating material. eM (which lies between zero and one) represents the ability of a body to efficiently absorb and radiate energy. It is generally a safe assumption that eM is independent of wavelength. Wien’s Law §6.2 Wien’s Law describes the wavelength λm at which the maximum emission occurs for any given temperature: λm T = 2.898 × 10−3 m · K. We see that λm varies inversely with temperature. This is shown in Fig. 2. (6.10) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Radiating Bodies Fig. 2: Spectrum of radiation vs. wavelength of a heated mass (blackbody) for three different temperatures. Wien’s law specifies the wavelength of peak emission as a function of wavelength - see WTS Fig. 6-3 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Cavity Radiation §6.3 In the case of an ideal radiating blackbody, it will soon prove useful to know the amount of radiated energy - and in particular, the spectral density of the radiation (that is, the frequency distribution) - at a particular temperature. Electromagnetic theory tells us that in order for EM waves to be supported in a cavity, the electric field vector must be zero at the cavity walls. This leads to the development of discrete “standing waves” as shown in Fig. 3, referred to as cavity modes. To satisfy the boundary conditions, there are an integral number of half-wavelengths occurring along the wave direction within the cavity. If we calculate the number of such modes at each frequency within a cavity and multiply by the average energy of each mode at these frequencies, this gives us the emission spectrum for cavity radiation, from which we calculate the number of modes that exist within a cavity of a given size. Fig. 3: Several modes of electromagnetic radiation within a confined cavity - see WTS Fig. 6-4 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Counting the Number of Cavity Modes §6.3 Assume that we have a cavity that is rectangular in shape with dimensions Lx , Ly , Lz and volume V = Lx Ly Lz . As we are considering only standing waves, we assume that the spatial dependence of the EM waves is an oscillatory function of the form e −i (kx Lx +ky Ly +kz Lz ) . In order to satisfy the boundary condition that the field is periodic in each direction and also zero at the boundaries, the exponential phase factor must be an integral multiple of π. This is accomplished by specifying that kx Lx = nx π, ky Ly = ny π, kz Lz = nz π, nx , ny , nz = 0, 1, 2, · · · . (6.11) Each of the modes in this cavity will have a specific value of k , and can be identified using the three mode numbers nx , ny , nz : !2 nx π 2 ny π nz π 2 2 2 2 2 k = kx + ky + kz = + + (6.12) . Lx Ly Lz The total number of modes in any volume V up to a given value of k can then be counted by visualizing a 3D space whose axes are defined as the number of modes, as in Fig. 4. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Counting the Number of Cavity Modes cont’ §6.3 In this figure, the number of modes in the x direction is the length of the cavity in that direction (Lx ), divided by one half-wavelength; i.e. nx = Lx /(λ/2). In total, the number of modes along each axis of the volume for a specific wavelength is nx = 2Lx /λ, ny = 2Ly /λ, nz = 2Lz /λ. Since the mode numbers must be positive, we need only to consider one octant of a full ellipsoid, as shown in the figure. Fig. 4: 3D diagram of the cavity mode volume - see WTS Fig. 6.5 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Counting the Number of Cavity Modes cont’ §6.3 Each mode can be considered as a cube of unit dimensions within the octant. For volumes with dimensions significantly larger than the wavelength, the total number of modes can be expressed as ! 4πη3 ν3 1 4π 2Lx 2Ly 2Lz M= · V, (6.13) = · · · 8 3 λ λ λ 3c 3 where we have used the relationship λν = c /η. When the cavity dimensions are on the same scale as the wavelength, this equation becomes less accurate due to the “voxelization” of the modes. Now, this calculation defines the number of modes within a volume V for all frequencies up to and including the frequency ν. This number must then be doubled to allow for the fact that each spatial mode can exist in two orthogonal polarizations. Thus, for frequencies up to the value ν, the mode density ρ (that is, the number of modes per unit volume) is ρ(ν) = 2M /V = 8πη3 ν3 /3c 3 . (6.14) This equation can then be differentiated to obtain the number of modes per unit volume within a given frequency interval between ν and ν + d ν, d ρ(ν) 8πη3 ν2 = . dν c3 (6.15) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Rayleigh-Jeans Formula §6.3 If the average energy per mode is on the order of kT - which you may recall from PC344 is a good approximation of any entity’s thermal energy - then we can obtain the Rayleigh-Jeans formula for the energy density u(ν) of radiation per unit volume within the frequency interval ν to ν + d ν; it is simply the energy per mode kT times the mode density per unit frequency (eq. 6.15): u(ν) = d ρ(ν) 8πη3 ν2 kT = kT . dν c3 (6.16) This result suggests that - at a given temperature T - there is a continuous increase in energy density with frequency. It agrees with experimental evidence for lower frequencies, but does not predict the experimentally observed maximum value as shown in Fig. 2. Rather, it suggests that energy density approaches infinity as frequency is increased. This clearly incorrect result is known as the ultraviolet catastrophe. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Planck’s Law for Cavity Radiation §6.3 The ultraviolet catastrophe was resolved by Einstein using Planck’s law (not by Planck himself, as the textbook indicates). Planck’s law suggests that the energy of a cavity mode is quantized ; than an oscillator of freqency ν can only have one of a discrete set of energies Em = mh ν, where m = 0, 1, 2, · · · . In this case, the Boltzmann distribution of energies at a given temperature T becomes fm = Ce −Em /kT = Ce −mh ν/kT . (6.17) The normalization condition becomes ∞ X m=0 fm = ∞ X m=0 Ce −mh ν/kT = C ∞ X e −mh ν/kT = 1, (6.18) m=0 which can be solved to obtain C = 1 − e −h ν/kT . Then, the average mode energy Ē is not kT , but rather P∞ hν m=0 Em fm (6.19) Ē = P = h ν/kT ∞ e −1 f m=0 m (see p. 211 of the text for the intermediate steps in this derivation). Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Planck’s Law for Cavity Radiation §6.3 Now if we return to eq. (6.16) and use this value of Ē in place of kT, we find the following relationship for the energy density per unit frequency: u(ν) = 8πh η3 ν3 . c 3 (e h ν/kT − 1) (6.20) This equation no longer suffers from the ultraviolet catastrophe. Rather, it exhibits the same functional form as the experimental distributions as shown in Fig. 2. The expression is known as Planck’s law for cavity radiation. We must be reminded that u(ν) describes the emitted energy density per unit frequency. This quantity will be useful toward the end of this chapter. We can also calculate the total emitted energy density by integrating over all frequencies: Z ∞ u= u(ν)d ν. (6.21) 0 Carrying out this integration (hey, that would make a good assignment problem) leads to the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Relation between Cavity and Blackbody Radiation §6.3 The previous 7 slides showed how to calculate the spectral energy density for radiation traveling in all directions within a cavity. In a laser, we are interested in directed radiation; that is, the radiation that is emitted along a particular direction. We can examine this by exploring the relationship between cavity and blackbody radiation. Refer back to Fig. 1(c). If we were to make a small hole of unit area through mass M2 into the cavity, we would observe a small amount of radiation of spectral intensity I(ν) emerging from the hole. I(ν) is related to the energy density u(ν) within the cavity. We can then calculate the total flux of radiation emerging from the cavity at frequency ν, traveling in all directions within a solid angle of 2π (a hemisphere). We refer to this radiation as the blackbody radiation intensity per unit frequency, IBB (ν). Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Relation between Cavity and Blackbody Radiation cont’ §6.3 We first need to obtain a relationship between u(ν) (energy per unit volume per unit frequency) and the flux I (ν) (energy per unit time per unit frequency flowing through a unit area). With the aid of Fig. 5, we consider a beam of light at I (ν) with cross-sectional area dA and traveling in a direction z that passes through dA in a time dt . The energy density of this radiation would be I (ν)dAdt . This would be equivalent to considering the energy density u(ν) of a beam existing within a volume dV = dA · z , where z = vdt and v is the velocity of the beam. Therefore, I(ν)dAdt = u(ν)dV = u(ν)dA · z = u(ν)dA · vdt . (6.22) If the volume element is in a vacuum, then v ≡ c , and thus I(ν) = u(ν)c (6.23) for a beam traveling in a specific direction. When the volume element is in a medium with index of refraction η, then we have I(ν) = u(ν)c /η. (6.24) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Fig. 5: Beam of light intensity I (ν) incident upon a volume of thickness z = cdt - see WTS Fig. 6.6 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Relation between Cavity and Blackbody Radiation cont’ §6.3 We can now convert the expression for energy density of radiation within a cavity of temperature T to an expression for the blackbody radiation emerging from the hole of unit surface area, as shown in Fig. 6. We start by realizing that radiation from any point within the cavity is traveling in all directions - that is, within a solid angle of 4π. We apply the coordinates shown in Fig. 7, where the fraction of radiation traveling within a solid angle d Ω/4π at a particular angle θ with respect to the normal to the plane of the hole is described by I(ν) cos θd Ω/4π. Here, we have assumed that the intensity emitted from the source is independent of angle; the factor cos θ accounts for the fact that when you look at the hole from an oblique angle, its area appears smaller. In spherical polar coordinates, the solid angle can be written d Ω = sin θd θd φ, and therefore the radiation flux along direction θ is I(ν) cos θ sin θd θd φ/4π. (6.25) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Fig. 6: Blackbody radiation escaping from a cavity with mass M at equilibrium temperature T - see WTS Fig. 6.7(a) Fig. 7: Coordinates for analyzing blackbody radiation escaping from a confined cavity - see WTS Fig. 6.7(b) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Cavity Radiation Relation between Cavity and Blackbody Radiation cont’ §6.3 The total blackbody flux is obtained by integrating this component of the flux over the entire hemisphere (a solid angle of 2π): Z 2π Z π/2 I(ν) cos θ sin θd θd φ I(ν) u(ν)c IBB (ν) = = = . (6.26) 4π 4 4 0 0 Finally, using the expression for u(ν) that we derived in eq. (6.20), we have (in a vacuum) IBB (ν, T ) = 2πh ν3 1 . 2 h ν/ kT c e −1 (6.27) This represents the spectral radiance of a blackbody as a function of frequency and temperature. In terms of wavelength (derivation is on p. 214 of the text), IBB (λ, T ) = 1 2πc 2 h . λ5 e ch /λkT − 1 (6.28) Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission §6.4 In previous chapters, we investigated the spontaneous emission process, in which electrons decay radiatively from a higher to a lower energy level. We also saw that radiative emission is not necessarily the dominant decay process; collisions with other particles (in a gas) or phonons (in a solid) can sometimes depopulate the upper level faster than the radiative process. Excitation or de-excitation of the upper level can also occur by way of photons. Excitation in this case is nothing more than absorption (a photon is absorbed, its energy raising an electron to a higher energy level). It sometimes helps to refer to this process as “stimulated” absorption, since it requires electromagnetic energy to stimulate the electron into the upper level. In 1917, Einstein suggested that perhaps stimulated radiative de-excitation - i.e. stimulated emission - is also possible. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission The Principle of Detailed Balance §6.4 The principle of detailed balance (sometimes referred to as the principle of microscopic reversibility) states that in equilibrium, the total number of particles leaving a certain quantum state per unit time equals the number arriving in that state per unit time. Furthermore, when there are various pathways (radiative, non-radiative, etc.), the number leaving by a particular pathway equals the number arriving by that pathway. This principle suggests that if a photon can stimulate an electron to move from a lower energy state ℓ to a higher state u by means of absorption, then a photon should also be able to stimulate an electron to move from the same upper state u to the same lower state ℓ. In the case of absorption, the photon disappears, with the energy being transferred to the absorbing species. In the case of stimulated emission, the species gives up a quantum of energy to produce a photon. This process must occur in order to keep the population of the two energy levels in thermal equilibrium. In the QM picture that we developed in chapter 3, the photon that initiates stimulated emission produces an oscillation of the excited atom’s dipole moment, which results in the emission of the second photon. This requires that the phase and direction of the emitted photon is identical to that of the stimulating photon. Coherence and directionality! Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Fig. 8: The three fundamental radiative processes associated with the interaction of light with matter. Top: spontaneous emission. Middle: stimulated emission. Bottom: absorption - see WTS Fig. 6.8 Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission Coefficients §6.4 Here, we derive the absorption and stimulated emission coefficients associated with these processes by considering radiation in thermal equilibrium. Consider a group of atoms having electrons which occupy either energy levels u or ℓ with population densities Nu and Nℓ . Since the atoms are in thermal equilibrium, these populations are related by the Boltzmann distribution gu −∆Euℓ /kT Nu e . = Nℓ gℓ (6.29) Now we consider photons interacting with this collection of atoms. We assume that the photons have frequencies νuℓ = ∆Euℓ /h ; that is, the photon energies are exactly equal to the difference in energy between levels u and ℓ. We previously defined Auℓ as the spontaneous transition probability (the rate at which spontaneous transitions occur). Thus, the number of spontaneous transitions per unit time per unit volume is Nu Auℓ . Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission Coefficients cont’ §6.4 As for the stimulated processes, these are proportional not only to the population of the appropriate level, but also to the photon energy density u(ν) at frequency νuℓ . If we label the proportionality constant of stimulated transitions as B , then the “upward flux” (the number of stimulated upward transitions per unit volume per unit time per unit frequency) is Nℓ Bℓu u(ν). Similarly, the “downward flux” would be Nu Buℓ u(ν). The constants Auℓ , Buℓ , and Bℓu are called the Einstein A and B coefficients; bear in mind that we have yet specify the formulas for the B coefficients. For the populations Nu and Nℓ to be in thermal equilibrium, and for the principle of detailed balance to apply, the downward and upward radiative flux between the two levels must be equal: Nu Auℓ + Nu Buℓ u(ν) = Nℓ Bℓu u(ν). (6.30) This equation can be manipulated in several ways to provide useful information about the equilibrium. First, we can rearrange it to solve for the photon energy density, " # !−1 Nu Auℓ Auℓ gℓ Bℓu h νuℓ /kT u(ν) = e −1 , = (6.31) Nℓ Bℓu + Nu Buℓ B u ℓ gu B u ℓ where we used eq. (6.29) to eliminate the population densities and made the substitution ∆Euℓ = h νuℓ . Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission Coefficients cont’ §6.4 Recall, however, that we previously calculated u(ν) for radiation in thermal equilibrium, eq. (6.20). These two representations of u(ν) will be equivalent if gℓ B ℓ u = 1 or gℓ Bℓu = gu Buℓ gu B u ℓ (6.32) and Bu ℓ = c3 Au ℓ . 8πh η3 ν3 (6.33) Thus, we have derived the relationship between the stimulated emission and absorption coefficients Buℓ and Bℓu , along with their relationship to the spontaneous emission coefficient Auℓ . Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission Coefficients cont’ §6.4 You will possibly recall that in chapter 4, we derived an expression for Auℓ in terms of Auℓ (ν) (the transition probability per unit frequency for a Lorentzian emission profile). We substitute this in the previous equation to obtain Bu ℓ = (ν − ν0 )2 + (γuTℓ /4π)2 c3 Auℓ (ν). 3 3 8πh η ν γuTℓ /4π2 If we now define Buℓ (ν) = γuTℓ /4π2 Bu ℓ , (ν − ν0 )2 + (γuTℓ /4π)2 which describes the frequency dependence of Buℓ , then we can write 8πh η3 ν3 Auℓ (ν) Au ℓ = . = Buℓ (ν) Bu ℓ c3 (6.34) (6.35) (6.36) Hence, the expressions for Buℓ (ν) and Bℓu (ν) will satisfy eq. (6.31) if gℓ Bℓu (ν) = 1 or gℓ Bℓu (ν) = gu Buℓ (ν). gu Buℓ (ν) (6.37) We have thus derived the stimulated emission coefficients (and their frequency-dependent counterparts) that define the way a photon beam interacts with a two-level system of atoms. Chapter 6. Radiation and Thermal Equilibrium Absorption and Stimulated Emission Absorption and Stimulated Emission Coefficients cont’ §6.4 It is intersting to compare the magnitude of the stimulated to spontaneous emission rates from level u to level ℓ. From eqns. (6.20) and (6.33), Buℓ u(ν) 1 = h ν /kT . Au ℓ e uℓ − 1 (6.38) Thus, stimulated emission is only significant for temperatures in which kT is of the same magnitude as νuℓ . The ratio equals 1 when h νuℓ /kT = ln 2 = 0.693. As an example, visible transitions in the green region of the spectrum have a photon energy of about 2.5 eV. In this region of the spectrum, Buℓ u(ν)/Auℓ = 1 for temperatures around 33,500 K. In nature, such temperatures only occur in stars. In lasers however, the ratio can be significantly greater than unity. This is because we use mirrors to contain the photons within a small volume. That is, we engineer a very large value of u(ν).