Content is Power Barco LiveDots Content is Power How does content on LED displays affects your OPEX? Author Bas van Heek Product Marketing Manager bas.vanheek@barco.com Page 1 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power INTRODUCTION In this white paper we discuss the effect of different content on power consumption of LED displays. We will explain how colors are generated and what impact this has on power. Additionally, we will link this to contrast (or brightness), as both are closely related. The best displays in the market are the ones that find the best balance between both, and those that allow you to manage that relationship correctly. Our goal is to increase the understanding when reading and comparing specifications in today’s over-saturated world of LED display systems. We want to provide knowledge that will help decision makers to make the right decisions and influencers specify the right product. We hope that after reading this white paper you will better understand how content and brightness work and what their impact is on your application. LED DISPLAY PRINCIPLES An LED display uses an array of light-emitting diodes (LED) as a video display. By default, LED display technology is a light emitting technology. Independent of which type of LED is used – SMD1 or TH LEDs – light is radiated from each individual LED. For both technologies, each individual color R-G-B is controlled separately to create basically any color within the RGB color spectrum. Fig. 1: RGB color spectrum (source: Wikipedia – RGB color model) 1 SMD (Surface Mounted Device) and TH (Thru-Hole or discrete) LEDs are both type of LEDs used in display arrays. For TH each R-G-B dies are individually packed, whereas for SMD R-G-B dies are combined into one package. Both SMD and TH refer to the way the LEDs are fixed to the PCB. Page 2 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power LEDs within the display array are grouped by at least one Red (R), Green (G) and Blue (B) LED, all together at full intensity creating white. At zero intensity, the LEDs emit no light at all and the display is black (or the color of the surface, hence all 98% of all LED display have a black front surface). This group of LEDs is often referred to as ‘pixel’. Fig. 2: Color creation on LED displays (source: Wikipedia – RGB color model) CREATING COLORS To create any color within the RGB color spectrum, the intensity of each LED must be controlled. Most LED displays nowadays specify a color depth of 16bit/color. This means for each LED R-G-B there are 216 or 65,536 steps between zero and full intensity, basically controlled by the LED driver that manages the current over the LED die. In total this can theoretically generate 216 x 216 x 216 or 281 trillion colors per pixel. Theoretically, as also dimming has an impact on color reproducibility. In the following example we simplify how a color is generated. We take a random color within the spectrum, purple. We use a computer to generate purple on an 8 bit/color scale with color intensities between 0 and 255. Fig. 3: Random color creation using 8bit/color on windows PC Page 3 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power This color purple is generated by 146/256 x Red 57.03% Red 39/256 x Green 15.23% Green 130/256 x Blue 50.78% Blue Percentages are relative to full intensity. COLOR VS POWER To convert this into power consumption we first need to address a bit about power consumption of a typical LED display. We consider here 1m² of a typical LED display system. A typical LED display system consists of LED modules2, controller, power supply and a heat management system. All components consume power, even when brightness of the LED display is zero (color = black). Blue Green Red General Fig. 4: Power consumption per color and total for 1sqm LED display (source: Barco) In Fig. 4 power consumption per color on 1sqm of a typical LED display is displayed. In the table, the following power consumptions are shown, assuming maximum intensity: General (BLACK) Full RED Full GREEN Full BLUE Full WHITE 74W 74 + 74 + 74 + 74 + 116 146 126 116 = = = + 190W 220W 200W 146 + 126 = 460W In summary it becomes clear not every color contributes equally to the total. This is caused by different power required for each color LED to function on one hand, and calibration (contribution per color to create perfect white D65) on the other hand. 2 PCB with LEDs mounted to the front, some intelligence and connectors on the back, often packed within a plastic housing optionally foreseen with protective potting or coating against water ingress Page 4 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power If we take same assumptions (maximum intensity) to create purple as randomly selected above on this particular display type, power consumption will look like: Purple 0 50 100 150 200 250 Fig. 5: Power consumption of typical LED display showing purple (source: Barco) The above figure can be summarized as follows: PURPLE: 74 + 66(R) + 22(G) + 64(B) = 226W Assuming the display show purple over its entire surface (the average color is purple), the average color purple consumes 226/460 = 49.1% of white. CAMPAIGN EXAMPLE Based on this theory, let’s discuss two Apple campaigns and what the impact is on power consumption and cost. Fig. 6: Reference advertisement 'Black' Fig. 7: Reference advertisement 'white' We are using http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color_summarizer/?analyze , a free online tool to determine the average color of both images. The gives the following results: Page 5 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power Table 1: RGB color analyser results Image Black White R 32 232 G 27 228 B 26 226 RGB 32.27 232 We now convert this into power on our typical LED display. Black: 74 + 32/256 x 116 + 27/256 x 146 + 26/256 x 126 = 117W White: 74 + 232/256 x 116 + 228/256 x 146 + 226/256 x 126 = 420W Considering pictures in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 the average power consumption per square meter is 117W for the ‘black’ image and 420W for the ‘white’ image. A difference of 303W, or in other words – the ‘black’ image consumes 72.1% less power than the ‘white’ image. COST IMPACT Assuming this would be a billboard campaign on 60sqm US billboards, we can calculate the annual power cost for both reference images. Table 2: Power consumption and cost Image Power/billboard Black White W 7,020 25,200 Power/ billboard/year kWh 61,495 220,752 $/kWh 0.14 0.14 $ 8,609 30,905 Power cost, similar as power consumption is 72.1% lower on ‘black’ image compared to ‘white’ image. The above example still assumes full brightness 24/7 and full year of operation. In real-life the display will only operate 18/7 and follow a daily brightness cycle, so difference should be corrected for that. Nevertheless, the difference remains 72.1% although yearly costs will be less. BRIGHTNESS VS POWER Talking about brightness, best not to underestimate the power of brightness either. There are a couple of reasons why managing the brightness correctly directly impacts your business case. 1. Brightness has direct impact on power consumption which affects your OPEX 2. Brightness has direct impact on LED lifetime, and thus operational lifetime of your investment 3. Correct brightness has impact on general acceptance of LED displays in urban areas a. Impacts driver safety Page 6 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power b. Impact acceptance of people living in direct neighborhood c. Impacts likelihood of getting building permits for outdoor digital advertising displays 4. Last but not least, correctly managed brightness control contributes positively to your company’s CSR score. Brightness is generally managed and controlled by a display agent using local light sensor readings of the environmental lighting conditions to set the correct display brightness. This automated process can be completed by additional rules to ensure correct brightness. For the following calculations we assume the following settings. We will again use the ‘white’ example picture from Fig. 7. Automated brightness control enabled Maximum brightness setting 75% of max Brightness during calculated night-time 3% Display Off midnight to 6am For the sake of argument we neglect in this example brightness variations due to different lighting conditions during the day, we assume during daytime the display is directly set to maximum allowed brightness according to predefined rules above. The brightness cycle of the display will look as follows: 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Average brightness in this case is: (6x0 + 7x3 + 11x75) / 24 = 35% In the example of the ‘white’ example picture from Fig. 7 this will result in: 74 + (232/256 x 116 + 228/256 x 146 + 226/256 x 126) x 0.35 = 195W An average power consumption of 195W instead of 420W, a saving of 225W, or 53.5%. Since we are taking into account Page 7 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power optimal brightness settings here, this does not affect your picture quality at all. On the contrary, it improves the image quality. Image quality is optimal while color reproduction, brightness and contrast are in balance. Not were brightness is maximum. Fig. 8: Schematic view of key to perfect image quality Converting into cost again, using same example of standard 60m² US Billboard will result in the following savings: Table 3: Power consumption and cost 100% vs 35% average brightness Image Power/billboard White (100%) White W 25,200 Power/ billboard/year kWh 220,752 $/kWh 0.14 $ 30,905 11,700 102,492 0.14 14,348 (35%) A simple feature as brightness control can provide cost savings up to 53.5%, or 276$/m²/year in this example. In real-life this will even be lower, since brightness curve during day will gradually increase to maximum and gradually decrease to night-time settings again, depending on how fast light conditions are changing. Page 8 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots Content is Power CONCLUSION Since LED display technology is light emitting technology, and colors are generated by changing intensity of individual light sources (LEDs), color has enormous effect on power consumption and therefore operational expenses. Depending on colors and backgrounds used in advertisement on LED displays, power cost can be reduced by numbers up to 75%. At the same time, predominantly dark content will also contribute to the lifetime of the display, which also impacts return on investment. Secondly, managed brightness control also contributes to power consumption and operational costs, apart from some other important but less direct cost impacting arguments. With managed brightness control significant cost savings up to 55% and more can be achieved. Again, this not only contributes to operational costs, it also stretches the lifetime of the display further improving return on investment. Barco LiveDots President Kennedypark 35 B-8500 Kortrijk Belgium +32 5636 8869 sales.livedots@barco.com Page 9 of 9 www.barco.com/livedots