Aconex Procedure Guide Shop Drawing Review CONFIDENTIALITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STATEMENT This document contains confidential information and uses an Aconex proprietary template. This document must not be used or disclosed for any purpose other than in connection with the implementation or use of the Aconex system (“the Purpose”). The intellectual property in this template (and any modification, enhancement, derivation or reproduction of it) is owned by Aconex and licensed solely for the Purpose and the licence of the original or modified document can be terminated by Aconex at any time at its absolute discretion. The Aconex name, logos and URLs are the property and/or marks of Aconex. Any modification, enhancement, derivation or reproduction of this document must contain this “Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Statement” and any other confidentiality and any other similar markings or legends contained herein. Any questions based on the confidentiality or ownership of this document should be directed to legal@aconex.com This procedure guide provides information about how Aconex can be best used in to manage the process. It does contain recommendations, but a project may choose to use alternative methods. Aconex are able to further provide consultancy and professional services to assist project teams and organisations to tailor their specific processes and procedures to the Aconex system. Document No: ASD-PRO-EN-303 Revision: 1407 Status: For Use Confidential and Proprietary to Aconex Aconex Procedure Guide – Shop Drawing Review Recommendation This procedure guide looks at Shop Drawing (SD) review. There are four sections: Recommendation Roles and Responsibilities Process Flow Diagram Aconex configuration requirements The main challenge with SD review is in the volume of documents that need to be managed and in the management of the review process of itself. The coordination of the comments to be returned to the consultants and the parallel nature of those reviews needs to be setup correctly. Options The two options for managing SD reviews in Aconex both are via the Documents module, one uses registered documents and transmittals the other utilises Workflows to manage the reviews. Both are viable, but the Workflow module is preferred. Using Document Transmittals Whilst it is possible to use the registered documents and transmittals to create and manager SD reviews, there are a number of considerations that need to be taken into account: Often the review will be carried out outside of or separate from Aconex, with other organisations and or processes along with different documentation or reports. Each SD review will go through a predefined review and approval process by the same parties within fixed times. The teams responding to the SD reviews may be submitting a separate recommendation or report document rather than commenting on the documents directly. For project teams this is a complex high volume, time critical process and using transmittals with attachments where time frames and recipients can be set on an ad-hoc basis for each transmittal rather than going through a pre-defined workflow can prove to be difficult. Aconex Recommendation Aconex recommends using the Document module with Workflows for SD reviews, Workflows is an easy association for the project team to make as a SD review is normally submitted pre-defined template that requires a formal assessment and report. The main benefits in using the Workflow module are: The SD review and its related attachments are automatically tracked. It’s easy to track the location of the SD reviews, along with their actions and status’ Saved searches allow for easy tracking of all SD reviews that remain unanswered and overdue What this gives you The workflow module provides powerful reporting capabilities and these are essential where any metrics or KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) are used to measure efficiency, e.g. reporting on overdue SD reviews or ones that are stuck in a particular review process. All these can be easily configured as saved searches (reports) within the workflow register. How? Typically, a team or organisation will use pre-defined business process for submitting SD reviews. The SDs are registered and then placed in a pre-defined business process workflow which provides an easy way to maintain consistency for SD review content. Often the documents themselves are not directly commented on, rather a detailed comments sheet is used, and these are then registered and attached as supplementary files to the workflow. ASD-PRO-EN-303 (Rev: 1407) Confidential and Proprietary to Aconex 2 Aconex Procedure Guide – Shop Drawing Review Roles and Responsibilities The following table outlines the main roles and responsibilities of those involved in this process. The table shows all the roles that could be involved in the process, but the extent of their involvement would depend on the nature of the project, its delivery method and contract type. Procedure Name: Shop Drawing Review Purpose: To provide a formal communication mechanism for submitting Shop Drawing Review requests that require a formal response. Application: For all Shop Drawing Reviews initiated by the Sub-Contractors. Vendors and Head Contractor. Roles and Responsibilities: Sub-Contractor (SC) Take action on instructions issued by HC. Head Contractor (HC) Manage and co-ordinate SD reviews of documents submitted by Design Consultants and issue comments. Project Manager (PM) Carry out SD review in coordination with the cost consultant and return comments to LC. Review Team Review SD documents and return comments to PM. Cost Consultant (CC) Review all SD documents, issued and make necessary forecasts to project budget Client (CL) Review SD documents and consultant comments where necessary and return comments to PM. Date of Procedure: Jul-2012 Document No: ASD-PRO-EN-303 Revision: 0 Status: For Use ASD-PRO-EN-303 (Rev: 1407) Submit SD review to HC Confidential and Proprietary to Aconex 3 Aconex Procedure Guide – Shop Drawing Review Process Flow Diagram The following diagram illustrates how the process works in Aconex. It is not the only method and project teams may use a Shop Drawing Review of this process depending on the contract and delivery method. For example, there may Project Manager and Client involvement. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW – ACONEX PROCESS SUB CONTRACTOR HEAD CONTRACTOR REVIEW TEAM COST CONSULTANT Receive documents for review and comment Receive documents for review and comment Review attachments Review attachments Review attachments Prepare comments on documents Return comments to Lead Consultant Return comments to Lead Consultant PROJECT MANAGER CLIENT Start Receive/Issue Shop Drawings for review Prepare Shop Drawings and submit Return submission for action No OK? Yes Transmit Documents for review and comment Receive documents for review and comment Forward Documents to review team Coordinate comments for return Receive comments from PM Receive commented documents Issue comments to Design Sub contractor Yes Subcontractor documents? Return comments for update No Comments OK? Return comments to HC No Client Input Req’d Issue comment to Client for review Receive documents for review and comment No Take appropriate action Review comments End Take appropriate action Review attachments Receive comments from Client Return comments End ASD-PRO-EN-303 (Rev: 1407) Confidential and Proprietary to Aconex 4 Aconex Procedure Guide – Shop Drawing Review Aconex Configuration Requirements The following table outlines the recommended project configuration and assigned roles to execute the Shop Drawing Review procedure in Aconex. Project Documents The following Project Document types are required on the project: Module: Project Document Key settings: Document Type Who is to use Shop Drawing Sub-contractor Initiating queries to HC for assessment. Head Contractor Initiating queries to project manager for assessment. Optional settings: Use Create relevant distribution groups in each organisation in accordance with relevant distribution matrix. Project Workflows The following Project Document workflows are recommended on the project: Module: Document Workflow Key settings: Workflow Type Who is to use SD review Workflow Project Manager Initiating Document review and comment by Consultants. Client SD Review Project Manager Initiating Document review and comment by Client Optional settings: Use Create relevant distribution groups in each organisation in accordance with relevant distribution matrix. Create template Workflow details for Consultant and Client reviews. Activate mail approver if senior/supervisor approvals are required as part of document control or QA procedures. Considerations and Further Recommendations The Shop Drawing review prepared by the consultants to provide the findings of their review to the Lead Consultant will often be submitted using a pre-defined project or organisation template (e.g. Word/Excel Template) attached as a supplementary file to the workflow rather than comment directly on the Shop Drawing itself. ASD-PRO-EN-303 (Rev: 1407) Confidential and Proprietary to Aconex 5