REPORT
2014s
DATA SERIES
Safety performance indicators –
2014 data
JUNE
2015
Acknowledgements
Safety Committee
Photography used with permission courtesy of ©psphotograph/
iStockphoto (Back cover)
Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information
contained in this publication, neither IOGP nor any of its Members past present or
future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless of its or their negligence, assume
liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which liability is
hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis
that any use by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer.
The recipient is obliged to inform any subsequent recipient of such terms.
This publication is made available for information purposes and solely for the private
use of the user. IOGP will not directly or indirectly endorse, approve or accredit the
content of any course, event or otherwise where this publication will be reproduced.
Copyright notice
The contents of these pages are ©International Association of Oil & Gas Producers.
Permission is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that
the copyright of IOGP and (ii) the sources are acknowledged. All other rights are
reserved. Any other use requires the prior written permission of IOGP.
These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of England and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively
subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
REPORT
2014s
JUNE
2015
DATA SERIES
Safety performance indicators –
2014 data
Revision history
VERSION
DATE
AMENDMENTS
1.0
June 2015
First release
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
4
Contents
Contents4
Contributing companies
6
Executive summary
7
Introduction and background
9
1. Summary of 2014 results
11
1.1 General
1.2 Fatalities
1.3 Total recordable injuries
1.4 Lost time injuries
11
12
15
16
2. Overall results
19
2.1 Fatalities
2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)
2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity
2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours
2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
2.7 Lost work day case categories and activities
2.8 Severity of lost work day cases
2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases
2.10 Incident triangles
2.11 Causal factors
2.12 Life-Saving Rules
19
20
22
28
30
32
34
43
46
49
52
58
3. Results by region
61
3.1 Fatalities
3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)
3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages
3.6 Severity of lost work day cases
3.7 Individual country performance
3.8 Incident triangles by region
61
62
63
64
65
67
69
72
4. Results by function
76
4.1 Fatalities
4.2 FAR, LTIF and TRIR – five-year rolling averages
76
77
5
4.3 Severity of lost work day cases (LWDC)
4.4 Exploration performance
4.5 Drilling performance
4.6 Production performance
4.7 Construction performance
4.8 Unspecified performance
79
79
82
85
88
91
5. Results by company
94
5.1 Overall company results
5.2 Company results by function
94
102
Appendix A
Database dimensions
Proportion of database used in analysis
104
104
107
Appendix B - Data tables
109
Section 1 Summary
Section 2 Overall results
Section 3 Results by region
Section 4 Results by function
Section 5 Results by company 110
110
114
123
129
Appendix C – Contributing companies
133
Appendix D – Countries represented
135
Appendix E – Glossary of terms
139
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
6
Contributing companies
The safety statistics for 2014 were derived from data provided by the following
companies:
ADNOC
MOL
ANADARKO
OIL SEARCH
BASHNEFT
OMV
BG GROUP
ORIGIN
BHP BILLITON
PAN AMERICAN ENERGY
BP
PEMEX
CAIRN ENERGY
PERENCO
CAIRN INDIA
PETROBRAS
CHEVRON
PETRONAS CARIGALI SDN BHD
CNOOC
PLUSPETROL
CONOCOPHILLIPS
PREMIER OIL
DOLPHIN ENERGY
PTTEP
DONG E&P
QATAR PETROLEUM
E.ON
RASGAS
ENI
REPSOL
EXXONMOBIL
RWE DEA AG
GALP
SASOL
GDF SUEZ E&P INTERNATIONAL
SHELL COMPANIES
GENEL
STATOIL
HESS CORPORATION
SUNCOR
HUSKY
TALISMAN ENERGY
INPEX
TOTAL
KOSMOS
TULLOW OIL
KUWAIT OIL COMPANY
WINTERSHALL
MAERSK OIL
WOODSIDE
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
YEMEN LNG
Executive summary
7
Executive summary
The 2014 IOGP Safety Performance Indicators show that the fatal accident rate for
reporting companies has decreased by 51% compared with 2013. The number of
fatalities has decreased from 80 in 2013 to 45 in 2014.
Fatal accident rate (FAR)
140
4.5
4.0
Number of fatalities
120
100
103
115
84
99
87
80
3.5
94
88
3.0
80
2.5
65
60
45
40
1.5
1.0
20
0
2.0
0.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
0.0
FAR fatalities per 100 million hours worked
Fatalities
Figure 1: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2005–2014)
Analysis of the 42 fatal incident descriptions in which there were 45 fatalities has
shown that at least 78% of the fatal incidents reported in 2014 related to the OGP
Life-Saving Rules published in March 2012, see IOGP Report 459.
Insufficient information to
assign a Rule 17%
No appropriate Rule 5%
Core Rule 38%
Supplementary Rule 40%
Figure 2: Life-Saving Rules applicable to 2014 fatal incidents - % of total incidents
reported in 2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
8
There are a number of common causal factors related to the fatal incidents and
high potential events from 2010 to 2014. The following five causal factors appear
consistently in the top ten for both fatal incidents and high potential events for
each of the past five years.
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/lack of awareness: Improper decision making or
lack of judgement
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/
procedures
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or
risk assessment.
The 4th most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the
top ten for high potential events was:
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire).
Personal injury performance shows the lost time injury frequency decreasing by
20% and the total recordable injury rate decreasing by 4% compared with 2013
results.
Five fatal incidents were as a result of process safety events.
LTIF and TRIR (per million hours worked)
Total recordable injury rate
Lost time injury frequency
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 3: Lost time injury frequency vs. total recordable injury rate (2005–2014)
Introduction & background
9
Introduction and background
The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, IOGP, has been collecting
safety incident data from its member companies globally since 1985. The data
collected are entered into the IOGP safety database, which is the largest database
of safety performance in the exploration and production (E&P) industry.
The principal purpose of the data collection and analysis is to record the
global safety performance of the contributing IOGP member companies on an
annual basis. The submission of data is voluntary and is not mandated by IOGP
membership. The annual reports provide trend analysis, benchmarking and the
identification of areas and activities on which efforts should be focused to bring
about the greatest improvements in performance.
The IOGP incident reporting system covers worldwide E&P operations, both
onshore and offshore, and includes incidents involving both member companies
and their contractor employees.
The key indicators presented are: number of fatalities, fatal accident rate, fatal
incident rate, total recordable injury rate, lost time injury frequency, number of
lost work day cases and number of lost work days, number of restricted duty case
and restricted duty days, and number of medical treatment cases. The report
presents contributing IOGP Members’ global results for these indicators, which
are then analysed by region, function and company. A code is used to preserve the
anonymity of the reporting company, which will typically report its own data as well
as that of its associated contractors (see Appendix C).
In 2010, data collection was initiated to capture 'causal factors' associated with
fatal incidents and high potential events. These data are presented in section 2.11
of this report. Wherever practicable, results are presented graphically. The data
underlying the charts are presented in Appendix B. The causal factors and chart
data are available to IOGP Members in editable format from the Members’ area of
the IOGP website.
This report is published with two separate addendums which provide the
narrative descriptions for the fatal incidents and high potential events reported by
participating IOGP member companies. These can be downloaded from the IOGP
public website http://info.iogp.org/, as well as the IOGP Safety Zone website
http://info.iogp.org/safety.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
10
Scope of reporting and data validation
The data requested from participating IOGP member companies are published in
an annual user guide in two parts:
• Part A contains definitions and the scope of the safety data submission.
This document is published on the IOGP public website.
• Part B contains practical information for the company nominees submitting the
data, copies of the data submission forms and a data submission checklist.
The safety data submission process is used for the collection of data relating to
safety performance, process safety performance and motor vehicle crashes. The
IOGP safety database has built-in data validation requirements and each company
data submission is validated by the IOGP Secretariat and the work group (Safety
Committee, Sub-committee, Task Force or Network) responsible for the data
set in accordance with the IOGP data collection and reporting procedure. Any
communication with reporting companies is conducted by the IOGP Secretariat and
any data validated by an IOGP workgroup is blind coded to preserve the anonymity
of the reporting companies.
A self-assessment questionnaire is included within the data submission process
to determine the alignment between the requested data and the company
submissions. The information provided in this questionnaire is also used in the
validation process. Data that appear to be incorrect and that cannot be confirmed
by the submitting company as correct may be excluded from the data set at the
discretion of the Secretariat.
The scope of data included within this report is detailed in Appendix A.
Data series
Other IOGP data reports published annually include:
• Environmental performance indicators
• Health performance indicators
• Process safety event data.
These are available from the IOGP website http://www.iogp.org/Our-library/
Summary of 2014 results
11
1. Summary of 2014 results
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data summarizes the safety performance of
contributing IOGP member companies for 2014.
The key performance indicators (KPI) used to benchmark safety performance are:
number of fatalities, fatal accident and incident rates, total recordable injury rate
and lost time injury frequency.
Third party fatalities are not included in this report.
1.1 General
The safety performance of contributing IOGP member companies in 2014 is based
on the analysis of 4 366 million work hours of data.
Submissions were made by 52 of the 58 operating company IOGP Members.
The data reported cover operations in 111 countries.
Contractor
Fatal accident rate
5000
20
4500
18
4000
16
3500
14
3000
12
2500
10
2000
8
1500
6
1000
4
500
2
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2014
0
Figure 4: Reported work hours and fatal accident rate (1985–2014)
Definitions
Fatal accident rate (FAR):
The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF):
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked.
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR):
The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases
+ medical treatment cases) per million hours worked.
FAR (fatalities per 100 million hours worked)
Number of work hours (millions)
Company
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
12
1.2 Fatalities
Against the background of a 16% increase in work hours reported, the number of
fatalities has decreased from 80 in 2013 to 45 in 2014. The 45 fatalities occurred in
42 separate incidents. The resulting fatal accident rate (FAR) of 1.03 is 51% lower
than last year’s figure (2.12). The company and contractor FAR are 0.53 and 1.17
respectively. Onshore and offshore FAR are 0.96 and 1.22 respectively.
Each reported fatal incident is allocated a work activity and incident category.
The activity with the highest number of fatalities reported by the IOGP member
companies is ‘drilling, workover, well services‘ (36%) with 16 fatalities as a result
of 14 separate incidents. Six fatalities (13%) were reported in six separate incidents
in the ‘construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ activity and also in the
‘lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations’ activity. Six fatalities (13%) were reported in
five separate incidents in the ‘transport – land’ activity.
Other 2.2%
Water related 6.7%
Caught between 15.6%
Confined space 2.2%
Struck by 33.3%
Explosions/burns 20.0%
Exposure electrical 6.7%
Pressure release 2.2%
Falls 11.1%
Figure 5: Percentage of fatalities by incident category (2014)
Summary of 2014 results
13
Category
Number of fatalities
Assault: Assault or violent act
0
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
7
Confined space: Confined space
1
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
0
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
9
Exposure electrical: Exposure electrical
3
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
0
Falls: Falls from height
5
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
0
Pressure release: Pressure release
1
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
0
Struck by: Struck by
15
Water related: Water related, drowning
3
Other: Other
1
Table 1: Fatalities by incident category (2014)
With regard to the incident category, the largest proportion of the fatalities
reported in 2014 were categorized as ‘struck by’ (15 fatalities in 15 separate
incidents). Seven of those incidents were in the activity ‘drilling, workover, well
services’, four were in ‘transport – land’, three were in the activity ‘lifting, crane,
rigging, deck operations’ and one was the result of a tree felling incident in
the ‘construction, commissioning, decommissioning’ activity. (13% of fatalities
reported in 2013 were in the category ‘struck by’.)
Fatalities categorized as ‘explosions or burns’ were the second greatest
contributors to the fatality statistics with nine fatalities in six separate incidents,
accounting for 9% of the fatalities (5% in 2013).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
14
Unspecified 2.2%
Transport – Water 4.4%
Construction 13.3%
Transport – Land 13.3%
Seismic 2.2%
Production 6.7%
Drilling 35.6%
Maintenance 8.9%
Lifting 13.3%
Figure 6: Percentage of fatalities by incident activity (2014)
Activity
Number of fatalities
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
6
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
0
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
16
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
6
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
4
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
0
Production: Production operations
3
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
1
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
0
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
6
Transport – Water: Transport – Water, incl. marine activity
2
Unspecified: Unspecified – other
1
Table 2: Fatalities by incident activity (2014)
The fatal accident rate for 2014 is 1.03, 51% lower than the 2013 rate (2.12). The
company only FAR for 2014 is 0.53, 71% lower than the 2013 rate. The offshore FAR
for 2014 is 1.22, 63% lower than the 2013 rate.
Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)
Summary of 2014 results
Company
Contractor
15
Overall
5
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 7: Fatal accident rate by company & contractor (2005–2014)
1.3 Total recordable injuries
The rate for all recordable injuries (fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted
work day cases and medical treatment cases) was 1.54 injuries per million hours
worked (1.60 in 2013).
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
A notable reduction in TRIR from 2013 to 2014 was shown in FSU (37%) and South
& Central America (11%).
Company
Contractor
Overall
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Figure 8: Total recordable injury rate by company & contractor (2005–2014)
2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
16
1.4 Lost time injuries
The overall lost time injury frequency (LTIF) fell from 0.45 in 2013 to 0.36 in 2014. This
represents a reduction of 20% compared with 2013 and 109 fewer lost time injuries.
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
This reduction is similar in both company and contractor performance. Both
company and contractor LTIF show a reduction compared with 2013 (35% and 17%
respectively). The onshore and offshore LTIF both also show a reduction compared
with 2013 (15% and 32% respectively).
Company
Contractor
Overall
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 9: Lost time injury frequency by company & contractor (2005–2014)
There were 1518 reported injuries resulting in at least one day off work, 1277
incidents were contractor related and 241 were company related.
• IOGP member companies reported 45 527 days of work lost through injuries.
• The greatest number of incidents was reported as ‘Struck by’ (353 cases
accounting for 23.0% of the total; 2013 results showed 367 cases, also
accounting for 23.3% of the total).
• ‘Caught in, under or between’ accounted for 342 cases, 22.4% of the total
(21% of the total in 2013).
Summary of 2014 results
Other 6.7%
17
Assault 0.7%
Water related 0.1%
Caught between 22.5%
Other
Confined space 0.1%
Struck by 23.3%
Cut 4.9%
Explosions/burns 3.6%
Exposure electrical 1.1%
Exposure N, C, B, V 0.9%
Slips/trips 18.2%
Falls 11.5%
Pressure release 0.5%
Overexertion 6.1%
Figure 10: Percentage of lost work day cases by incident category (2014)
Category
Assault: Assault or violent act
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
Confined space: Confined space
Number of LWDC
10
342
1
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
74
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
55
Exposure electrical: Exposure electrical
17
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
14
Falls: Falls from height
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
Pressure release: Pressure release
174
92
7
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
276
Struck by: Struck by
353
Water related: Water related, drowning
Other: Other
Table 3: Lost work day cases by incident category (2014)
1
102
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
18
Unspecified 8.1%
Construction 9.1%
Transport – Water 5.1%
Diving 0.6%
Transport – Land 3.0%
Transport – Air 0.3%
Seismic 1.3%
Drilling 25.0%
Production 17.0%
Lifting 7.2%
Office 7.5%
Maintenance 15.8%
Figure 11: Percentage of lost work day cases by incident activity (2014)
Activity
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
Number of LWDC
138
9
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
380
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
110
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
240
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
114
Production: Production operations
258
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
19
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
4
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
46
Transport – Water: Transport – Water, incl. marine activity
77
Unspecified: Unspecified – other
Table 4: Lost work day cases by incident activity (2014)
123
2. Key performance indicators
19
2. Overall results
In this section the key performance indicators used to measure contributing IOGP
Member companies’ safety performance are: the number and nature of fatalities,
total recordable injury rate (TRIR), fatal accident rate (FAR), fatal incidents per
100 million work hours, and lost time injury frequency (LTIF).
Third party incidents are not included in this report.
2.1 Fatalities
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
2
13
3
2
5
15
Contractor
28
34
12
31
40
65
Overall
30
47
15
33
45
80
Company
Table 5: Number of fatalities (2013 & 2014)
Company/contractor fatalities
• 45 company and contractor fatalities were reported in 2014. This is 35 fewer
than were reported in 2013 and 43 fewer than in 2012.
• The 45 fatalities occurred in 42 separate incidents.
Fatal accident rate (FAR)
140
4.5
4.0
Number of fatalities
120
100
103
115
84
99
87
80
3.5
94
88
3.0
80
2.5
65
60
45
40
1.5
1.0
20
0
2.0
0.5
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Figure 12: Number of fatalities and fatal accident rate (2005–2014)
2014
0.0
FAR (fatalities per 100 million hours worked)
Fatalities
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
20
2.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)
Fatal accident rate (FAR)
2014
2013
2014 relative to 2013 FAR
Company
0.53
1.83
$ 71% lower
Contractor
1.17
2.20
$ 47% lower
Overall
1.03
2.12
$ 51% lower
Onshore
0.96
1.70
$ 44% lower
Offshore
1.22
3.27
$ 63% lower
Table 6: Fatal accident rate (2013 & 2014)
In 2014 there were five company fatalities (14 in 2013) as a result of three
separate incidents.
In 2014 there were 40 contractor fatalities (65 in 2013).
Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)
The difference between the onshore and offshore FAR displays a large variation
over the 10-year period shown. Neither is consistently lower. This is generally
attributable to single transportation or fire and explosion incidents involving high
numbers of fatalities.
Company
Contractor
Overall
5
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Figure 13: Fatal accident rate by company & contractor (2005–2014)
2013
2014
Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)
2. Key performance indicators
Onshore
Offshore
21
Overall
5
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Figure 14: Fatal accident rate by onshore & offshore operations (2005–2014)
Definitions
Fatal accident rate (FAR):
The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked
2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
22
2.3 Fatalities by incident category and activity
Assault or violent act
Caught in, under or between
Confined space
Cut, puncture, scrape
Explosions or burns
Exposure electrical
Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
Falls from height
Overexertion, strain
Pressure release
Slips and trips (at same height)
Struck by
Water related, drowning
Other
Overall
Incident category
Construction,
commissioning,
decommissioning
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
6
Diving, subsea, ROV
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Drilling, workover, well
services
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
2
0
0
0
7
0
0
16
Lifting, crane, rigging,
deck operations
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
6
Maintenance, inspection,
testing
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Office, warehouse,
accommodation, catering
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Production operations
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
Seismic /survey
operations
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Activity
Transport – Air
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Transport – Land
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
6
Transport – Water, incl.
marine activity
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
Unspecified – other
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
Overall
0
7
1
0
9
3
0
5
0
1
0
15
3
1
45
Table 7: Fatalities by incident category and activity (2014)
2. Key performance indicators
23
Forty of the 42 fatal incidents involved one fatality.
Both of the incidents that involved two or more fatalities were reported under the
‘explosions or burns’ category.
The largest proportion of the fatalities reported in 2014 were the result of
individuals being struck by falling or moving objects — 33% (13% in 2013).
• Seven contractors lost their lives in seven separate incidents in the ‘drilling,
workover, well services’ activity:
–– One worker was stuck by a pipe joint causing him to fall and strike the
back of his head.
–– One worker was struck by the element of a damaged plug during
well construction works, when the mud pump for well washing was
started up and the welded plug tore off from the quick-split joint of the
manifold force line.
–– A worker was fatally injured when he moved into the path of the
pipeline during a repair, consisting of changing a production line
segment that had broken during a well fracturing job.
–– One man was struck by a stabilizer (17½ inch in diameter, 2.14 m long
and approximate weight of 765 kg) that fell during an operation to
remove it from the drilling column.
–– One worker died and another was seriously injured when they were
trying to break out a cross-over from a drill pipe and the elevator arm
made contact with mast beam and swung, striking the two workers.
–– On a carousel rig, a 5 inch joint dropped from pneumatic elevators
down the V door to the pipe rack, hitting two roustabouts working
close to a catwalk, one was fatally injured. The elevators had been
accidentally opened by a third party operator while trying to move the
joystick box with the elevators loaded.
–– One fatality occurred during well servicing operations.
• Three contractors died in three separate lifting incidents:
–– One worker died and another was injured when a jammed chain
block’s sprocket suddenly ruptured releasing an array of projectiles
which struck the workers.
–– One worker was struck by a skid mounted load during truck loading
activity.
–– One worker died during platform refuelling; once the refuelling came
to an end, while relocating the hose in its seat with the assistance
of a crane operator, the hose was released due to the failure of the
suspending fibre rope and the hose coupling struck the worker in the
head.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
24
• Four contractors died in four separate road accidents:
–– A
company-owned bus that was transporting workers to the office
was involved in a head-on collision with a third-party dump truck; the
driver was fatally injured.
–– A truck driver died after exceeding the speed limit and driving too
close to the vehicle in front. The truck collided with the other vehicle
(truck and trailer) due to the short stopping distance.
–– A bowser carrying around 50 000 litres of crude oil was hit by a passing
trailer resulting in a leak but no fire. One fatality was recorded.
–– A driver was killed in a public roadway accident.
• One contractor died as the result of a tree felling incident in the ‘construction,
commissioning, decommissioning’ activity.
Nine fatalities, 20% of the total reported in 2014, were categorized as ‘explosions
or burns’ (5% in 2013).
• Two company employees and one contractor died in a single incident in the
‘drilling, workover, well services’ activity which occurred on an offshore rig in
the Gulf of Mexico as the result of an explosion caused by a gas leak during
cementing of the well.
• Two contractor employees died in a single incident in the ‘transport – land’
activity in which a crude oil tanker carrying 50 000 litres of crude parked next
to the road side, was hit head-on by a vehicle resulting in a fire.
• A sudden gas release, which occurred on the wellhead, resulted in a serious
fire, one contractor fatality, and two first aid injuries. The crew had been
working on tubing installation prior to production.
• During workover of an oil well in the oil field vented gas ignited and set the
wellsurface and workoverunit on fire resulting in the death of one contractor.
• A fire at a compressor reached the workers causing one contractor fatality.
• Loss of containment heating system and oil injection to the well, caused
an explosion that reached the camp where staff were working causing one
contractor fatality.
Seven fatalities, 16% of the total fatalities reported in 2014, were categorized as
‘caught in, under or between’ (9% in 2013).
• During construction work a machinery driver reversed the truck and did not
see a worker causing his death.
• One worker was caught between drill-collars during an operation to move
them with a fork lift – he had returned to the cleared operations area
unexpectedly to remove a rope.
• A worker without training or permit to work was operating a crane causing a
crash of the cab and his death.
2. Key performance indicators
25
• An electrician was fatally injured during maintenance of the drive system of
load elevator door.
• A contract driller drilling shot holes for a seismic acquisition contractor was
fatally injured when a hooded sweater he was wearing became entangled in
the rotating drill string.
• A derrickman was fatally injured during a manoeuvre to move five steel
plates, weighing approximately two tons with the support of crew which
consisted of three people. They had removed and were holding the plates
because the crane was receiving material from a boat. During the manoeuvre
the worker was caught between the plates and a wall.
• While conducting repairs to the Pipe Handling Machine, a mechanic was
caught between the equipment and crushed.
11% of the fatalities reported in 2014 were categorized as ‘falls from height’
(4% in 2013).
• A contractor scaffolder fell from an offshore installation in the North Sea to
the sea through an open section of deck grating, which had been removed for
underdeck access. The opening had been barriered off with an appropriately
sized and constructed scaffold barrier.
• A contractor died after falling from a permanent working platform which is
about six metres high whilst conducting inspection on a grating replacement job.
• A contractor died after falling from a ladder, hitting the floor with his head.
• A worker died when the welded support of the crane that was welded to the
structure failed and the crane and the IP fell into the water.
• A driller died after climbing up 10 metres to carry out a repair without a
safety harness. He lost his balance and fell to the drilling floor.
The number of deaths resulting from land transport incidents remains unchanged
(6 fatalities, 13% of all fatalities) compared with 2013 (6 fatalities, 8% of all
fatalities in 2013; 9 fatalities, 11% in 2012).
• Six fatalities were associated with five separate incidents.
There were no fatal incidents reported under the following categories:
• Assault or violent act
• Cut, puncture, scrape
• Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
• Slips, trips, falls (at same height).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
26
Other 2.2%
Water related 6.7%
Caught between 15.6%
Confined space 2.2%
Struck by 33.3%
Explosions/burns 20.0%
Exposure electrical 6.7%
Pressure release 2.2%
Falls 11.1%
Figure 15: Percentage of fatalities by incident category (2014)
Category
Number of
fatalities
Assault: Assault or violent act
0
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
7
Confined space: Confined space
1
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
0
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
9
Exposure electrical: Exposure electrical
3
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical, biological, vibration
0
Falls: Falls from height
5
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
0
Pressure release: Pressure release
1
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
Struck by: Struck by
0
15
Water related: Water related, drowning
3
Other: Other
1
Table 8: Fatalities by incident category (2014)
2. Key performance indicators
27
Unspecified 2.2%
Transport – Water 4.4%
Construction 13.3%
Transport – Land 13.3%
Seismic 2.2%
Production 6.7%
Drilling 35.6%
Maintenance 8.9%
Lifting 13.3%
Figure 16: Percentage of fatalities by incident activity (2014)
Activity
Number of
fatalities
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
6
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
0
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
16
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
6
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
4
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
0
Production: Production operations
3
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
1
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
0
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
6
Transport – Water: Transport – Water, incl. marine activity
2
Unspecified: Unspecified – other
1
Table 9: Fatalities by incident activity (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
28
2.4 Number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours
Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours
2014
2013
2014 relative to 2013 FIR
Company
0.32
0.85
$ 62% lower
Contractor
1.14
1.22
$ 7% lower
Overall
0.96
1.14
$ 16% lower
Onshore
0.92
0.94
$ 2% lower
Offshore
1.06
1.68
$ 37% lower
Table 10: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours (2013 & 2014)
The number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours is a measure of the
frequency with which fatal incidents occur, in contrast to the FAR which measures
the frequency of fatalities. Accordingly, for company and contractor fatalities, the
number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours will be less than or equal to
the FAR. Comparison of FAR and number of fatal incidents per 100 million work
hours gives an indication of the magnitude of the incidents in terms of lives lost.
Overall the number of fatal incidents per 100 million work hours has decreased by
16% compared with last year and is the lowest on record (42 fatal incidents in 2014,
43 fatal incidents in 2013).
Number of fatalities and fatal incidents
Fatalities
Fatal incidents
140
115
120
100
80
103
103
87
84
74
73
99
94
88
82
67
60
58
80
65
50
52
2011
2012
43
45 42
2013
2014
40
20
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Figure 17: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents (2005–2014)
2. Key performance indicators
Fatal incidents per 100 million hours worked
Company
Contractor
29
Overall
5
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 18: Fatal incidents per 100 million hours by company & contractor (2005–
2014)
Fatal incidents per 100 million hours worked
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
5
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 19: Fatal incidents per 100 million hours by onshore & offshore (2005–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
30
2.5 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
Total recordable incident rate (TRIR)
2014
2013
2014 relative to 2013 TRIR
Company
0.90
0.95
$ 5% lower
Contractor
1.70
1.77
$ 4% lower
Overall
1.54
1.60
$ 4% lower
Onshore
1.33
1.33
1
Offshore
2.16
2.34
$ 8% lower
No change
Table 11: Total recordable injury rate (2013 & 2014)
Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out,
leaving a dataset of 3 909 million hours, 90% of the database (see Appendix A).
An overall reduction in TRIR of 4% is seen in 2014.
Definitions
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases +
medical treatment cases) per million hours worked.
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
2. Key performance indicators
Company
Contractor
31
Overall
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 20: Total recordable injury rate by company & contractor (2005–2014)
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
4
3
2
1
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Figure 21: Total recordable injury rate by onshore & offshore (2005–2014)
2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
32
2.6 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
2014
2013
2014 relative to 2013 LTIF
Company
0.26
0.40
$ 35% lower
Contractor
0.39
0.47
$ 17% lower
Overall
0.36
0.45
$ 20% lower
Onshore
0.29
0.34
$ 15% lower
Offshore
0.52
0.77
$ 32% lower
Table 12: Lost time injury frequency (2013 & 2014)
There were 1 518 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off
work, which equates to an average of 29 injuries resulting in at least one day off
work every week of the year or four injuries every day of the year.
Although the absolute number of LWDCs has reduced (1 627 in 2013), the time away
from work has increased for company workers and onshore activities compared with
2013. See section 2.8 for further information on lost work day case severity.
Definitions
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked.
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
2. Key performance indicators
Company
Contractor
33
Overall
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 22: Lost time injury frequency by company & contractor (2005–2014)
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Figure 23: Lost time injury frequency by onshore & offshore (2005–2014)
2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
34
2.7 Lost work day case categories and activities
Category
Number
Assault: Assault or violent act
% of total
10
0.7
342
22.5
1
0.1
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
74
4.9
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
55
3.6
Exposure electrical: Exposure electrical
17
1.1
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
14
0.9
174
11.5
92
6.1
7
0.5
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
276
18.2
Struck by: Struck by
353
23.3
1
0.1
102
6.7
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
Confined space: Confined space
Falls: Falls from height
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
Pressure release: Pressure release
Water related: Water related, drowning
Other: Other
Overall
1 518
Table 13: Lost work day cases by category (2014)
Other 6.7%
Water related 0.1%
Assault 0.7%
Caught between 22.5%
Confined space 0.1%
Cut 4.9%
Struck by 23.3%
Explosions/burns 3.6%
Exposure electrical 1.1%
Exposure NCBV 0.9%
Slips/trips 18.2%
Falls 11.5%
Pressure release 0.5%
Overexertion 6.1%
Figure 24: Percentage of lost work day cases by category (2014)
2. Key performance indicators
35
Of the 1 518 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work,
1 277 incidents (84%) were contractor-related and 241 (16%) were company-related
(1 312 and 315 respectively for 2013). The lost work day case category was provided
for all of the lost work day cases reported, although 6.7% of the cases were
categorized as ‘other’.
The pie chart shows the percentage of LWDCs within each of the reporting
categories for 2014.
• The greatest number of incidents was reported as ‘struck by’ – 353 cases
accounting for 22.5% of LWDCs (2013 results showed 367 cases accounting
for 22.6%).
• ‘Caught in, under or between’ accounted for 342 cases, 22.5% of the total
(341 cases, 21.0% of the total in 2013).
• In comparison with 2013, the 2014 results were very similar.
Definitions
Lost work day case (LWDC)
An incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
36
Category
Company
Contractor
2
8
34
308
Confined space: Confined space
0
1
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
9
65
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
7
48
Exposure electrical: Exposure electrical
3
14
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
2
12
Falls: Falls from height
30
144
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
14
78
1
6
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
72
204
Struck by: Struck by
56
297
1
0
10
92
241
1 277
Assault: Assault or violent act
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
Pressure release: Pressure release
Water related: Water related, drowning
Other: Other
Overall
Table 14: Lost work day cases by category – company & contractor data (2014)
Other 4.1%
Water related 0.4%
Confined space
Assault 0.8%
Caught between 14.1%
Cut 3.7%
Explosions/burns 2.9%
Struck by 23.2%
Exposure electrical 1.2%
Exposure NCBV 0.8%
Falls 12.4%
Slips/trips 29.9%
Overexertion 5.8%
Pressure release 0.4%
Figure 25: Lost work day cases by category – company data (2014)
2. Key performance indicators
37
Confined
Water re
Assault 0.6%
Other 7.2%
Caught between 24.1%
Cut 5.1%
Struck by 23.3%
Explosions/burns 3.8%
Slips/trips 16.0%
Exposure electrical 1.1%
Exposure NCBV 0.9%
Falls 11.3%
Pressure release 0.5%
Overexertion 6.1%
Figure 26: Lost work day cases by category – contractor data (2014)
Category
Onshore
Offshore
8
2
181
161
1
0
Cut: Cut, puncture, scrape
41
33
Explosions/burns: Explosions or burns
37
18
6
11
10
4
109
65
53
39
3
4
Slips/trips: Slips and trips (at same height)
171
105
Struck by: Struck by
195
158
Assault: Assault or violent act
Caught between: Caught in, under or between
Confined space: Confined space
Exposure electrical
Exposure N, C, B, V: Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
Falls: Falls from height
Overexertion: Overexertion, strain
Pressure release: Pressure release
Water related: Water related, drowning
Other: Other
Overall
1
0
76
26
892
626
Table 15: Lost work day cases by category – onshore & offshore (2014)
Of the 1 518 reported lost work day cases resulting in at least one day off work,
892 incidents (59%) were related to onshore activity and 626 (41%) were related to
offshore activity (879 and 748 respectively for 2013).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Other 8.5%
38
Assault 0.9%
Caught between 20.3%
Water related 0.1%
Confined space 0.1%
Cut 4.6%
Struck by 21.9%
Explosions/burns 4.1%
Exposure electrical 0.7%
Exposure NCBV 1.1%
Slips/trips 19.2%
Falls 12.2%
Pressure release 0.3%
Overexertion 5.9%
Figure 27: Lost work day cases by category – onshore operations (2014)
Other 4.2%
Water related 0.1%
Confined space 0.1%
Assault 0.3%
Caught between 25.7%
Struck by 25.2%
Cut 5.3%
Explosions/burns 2.9%
Slips/trips 16.8%
Pressure release 0.6%
Exposure electrical 1.8%
Exposure NCBV 0.6%
Falls 10.4%
Overexertion 6.2%
Figure 28: Lost work day cases by category – offshore operations (2014)
2. Key performance indicators
39
Activity
Number
% of total
138
9.1
9
0.6
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
380
25
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
110
7.2
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
240
15.8
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
114
7.5
Production: Production operations
258
17
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
19
1.3
4
0.3
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
46
3
Transport – Water incl. marine activity
77
5.1
123
8.1
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
Unspecified: Unspecified other
Overall
1 518
Table 16: Lost work day cases by activity (2014)
Lost work day case activities were reported for all of the 1,518 Lost Work Day
Cases reported.
Unspecified 8.1%
Transport – Water 5.1%
Construction 9.1%
Diving 0.6%
Transport – Land 3.0%
Transport – Air 0.3%
Seismic 1.3%
Production 17.0%
Drilling 25.0%
Office 7.5%
Lifting 7.2%
Maintenance 15.8%
Figure 29: Lost work day cases by activity
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
40
Activity
Company
Contractor
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
7
131
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
1
8
40
340
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
5
105
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
37
203
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
31
83
Production: Production operations
74
184
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
0
19
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
1
3
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
9
37
Transport – Water incl. marine activity
4
73
32
91
241
1 277
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
Unspecified: Unspecified other
Overall
Table 17: Lost work day cases by activity – company & contractor (2014)
Construction 2.9%
Unspecified 13.3%
Transport – Water 1.7%
Transport – Land 3.7%
Transport – Air 0.4%
Diving 0.4%
Drilling 16.6%
Lifting 2.1%
Maintenance 15.4%
Production 30.7%
Figure 30: Lost work day cases by activity – company (2014)
Office 12.9%
2. Key performance indicators
41
Unspecified 7.1%
Construction 10.3%
Transport – Water 5.7%
Diving 0.6%
Transport – Land 2.9%
Transport – Air 0.2%
Seismic 1.5%
Drilling 26.6%
Production 14.4%
Office 6.5%
Lifting 8.2%
Maintenance 15.9%
Figure 31: Lost work day cases by activity – contractor (2014)
Activity
Construction: Construction, commissioning, decommissioning
Onshore
Offshore
98
40
4
5
234
146
Lifting: Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
45
65
Maintenance: Maintenance, inspection, testing
105
135
76
38
Production: Production operations
180
78
Seismic: Seismic/survey operations
16
3
2
2
Transport – Land: Transport – Land
41
5
Transport – Water incl. marine activity
10
67
Unspecified: Unspecified other
81
42
892
626
Diving: Diving, subsea, ROV
Drilling: Drilling, workover, well services
Office: Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
Transport – Air: Transport – Air
Overall
Table 18: Lost work day cases by activity – onshore & offshore (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
42
Unspecified 9.1%
Construction 11.1%
Transport – Water 1.1%
Diving 0.4%
Transport – Land 4.6%
Transport – Air 0.2%
Seismic 1.9%
Drilling 26.2%
Production 20.2%
Lifting 5.0%
Office 8.5%
Maintenance 11.8%
Figure 32: Lost work day cases by activity – onshore (2014)
Unspecified 6.7%
Construction 6.4%
Transport – Water 10.7%
Diving 0.8%
Transport – Land 0.8%
Transport – Air 0.3%
Seismic 0.5%
Drilling 23.3%
Production 12.5%
Office 6.1%
Maintenance 21.6%
Figure 33: Lost work day cases by activity – offshore (2014)
Lifting 10.4%
2. Key performance indicators
43
2.8 Severity of lost work day cases
Severity of LWDC (Average days lost per LWDC)
2014
2013
2014 relative to
2013 severity
2014 relative to
2009-2013 severity
Company
51.6
43.5
# 19% higher
# 34% higher
Contractor
40.3
42.9
$ 6% lower
$ 4% lower
Overall
42.2
43.0
$ 2% lower
# 2% higher
Onshore
39.9
35.8
# 11% higher
# 7% higher
Offshore
45.5
51.2
$ 11% lower
$ 6% lower
Table 19: Average severity of lost work day cases
IOGP member companies reported a total of 45 527 days lost (LWDC days) through
injuries.
• The number of days lost was reported for 74% of the database
(see Appendix A and Appendix C).
• The offshore LWDC severity is 14% higher than onshore.
Definitions
Severity of lost work day cases
The number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case (LWDC).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Company
Contractor
44
Overall
Average days lost per LWDC
60
Cont
50
Com
40
Over
30
20
10
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2013
2014
Figure 34: Severity of LWDC by company & contractor (2005–2014)
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Average days lost per LWDC
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Figure 35: Severity of LWDC by onshore & offshore (2005–2014)
2. Key performance indicators
45
Figures 36 and 37 show the average number of days lost per LWDC in 2014
compared with the average for the previous five-year period. A 2% increase is
shown in overall LWDC severity when compared with the previous five-year period.
2014
2009–2013
2014
60
Average days of lost work per LWDC
Average days of lost work per LWDC
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2009–2013
Company
Contractor
Overall
Figure 36: Severity of lost work day
cases by company & contrator
(2014 compared with 2009–2013)
50
40
30
20
10
0
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Figure 37: Severity of lost work day
cases by onshore & offshore (2014
compared with 2009–2013)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
46
2.9 Severity of restricted work day cases
Severity of RWDC (Average days lost per RWDC)
2014
2013
2014 relative to
2013 severity
2014 relative to
2009-2013 severity
Company
14.6
17.2
$ 15% lower
$ 1% lower
Contractor
11.6
14.2
$ 19% lower
$ 8% lower
Overall
11.8
14.5
$ 18% lower
$ 7% lower
Onshore
12.2
15.4
$ 21% lower
$ 5% lower
Offshore
11.2
13.0
$ 14% lower
$ 11% lower
Table 20: Severity of restricted work day cases (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
A total of 10 115 days were restricted (RWDC days) as a result of restricted work
day cases, in the sense that normal duties could not be performed. This compares
with 45 527 days lost (LWDC days) on a 16% larger dataset (see Appendix A and
Appendix C).
Definitions
Severity of restricted work day cases
The number of days of restricted work per restricted work day case (RWDC).
Restricted work day cases are not reported by all companies and RWDC days are not reported
by all companies that report RWDC. See Appendix A.
2. Key performance indicators
Company
Contractor
47
Overall
Average days lost per RWDC
20
Cont
Com
15
Over
10
5
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 38: Severity of restricted work day cases by company & contractor (2005–
2014)
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Average days lost per RWDC
20
15
10
5
0
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Figure 39: Severity of restricted work day cases by onshore & offshore (2005–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
48
Figures 40 and 41 show the average number of days lost per RWDC in 2014
compared with the average for the previous five-year period. The overall average
shows a reduction of 18% compared with the average for the previous five-year
period.
2014
2009–2013
2014
20
Average days of lost work per LWDC
Average days of lost work per RWDC
20
15
10
5
0
2009–2013
Company
Contractor
Overall
Figure 40: Severity of restricted work
day cases by company & contrator
(2014 compared with 2009–2013)
15
10
5
0
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
Figure 41: Severity of restricted work
day cases by onshore & offshore (2014
compared with 2009–2013)
2. Key performance indicators
49
2.10 Incident triangles
In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in
the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the
absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to
fatalities
Ratio of total recordable
injuries to fatalities
2014
35:1
134:1
2013
21:1
73:1
2012
20:1
72:1
2011
22:1
93:1
2010
15:1
60:1
2009
16:1
63:1
Table 21: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities (2009–2014)
Definitions
Lost time injuries:
Lost work day cases and fatalities.
Recordable injuries:
Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where
medical treatment cases are reported for the data set.
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities:
The number of lost time injuries divided by the total number of fatalities
(lost time injuries/fatalities).
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities
(recordable injuries/fatalities).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
1
50
1
1
35
49
32
134
140
133
Overall
Company
Fatality
Lost time
injuries
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 42: Incident triangles by company & contractor (2014)
1
1
1
Fatality
21
21
21
Lost time
injuries
73
48
79
Recordable
injuries
Overall
Company
Contractor
Figure 43: Incident triangles by company & contractor (2013)
The varying ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries to recordable injuries for
2013–2014 challenges the traditional notion of recordable injuries and lost time
injuries overall as a precursor to fatalities as shown in the incident triangles. In
some incident categories however such as 'confined space, 'assault or violent act'
and 'water related, drowning', the ratio will be higher as shown in Tables 22 and 23.
2. Key performance indicators
Category
51
Fatalities
Ratio
LTI: Fatality
10
0
n/a
349
7
50:1
2
1
2:1
Cut, puncture, scrape
74
0
n/a
Explosions or burns
64
9
7:1
Exposure electrical
20
3
7:1
Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
14
0
n/a
179
5
36:1
92
0
n/a
8
1
8:1
Slips and trips (at same height)
276
0
n/a
Struck by
368
15
25:1
4
3
1:1
103
1
103:1
Assault or violent act
Caught in, under or between
Confined space
Falls from height
Overexertion, strain
Pressure release
Water related, drowning
Other
LTIs
(fatalities + LWDCs)
Table 22: Ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries by category
Activity
Construction, commissioning,
decommissioning
LTIs
(fatalities + LWDCs)
Fatalities
Ratio
LTI: Fatality
144
6
24:1
9
0
n/a
Drilling, workover, well services
396
16
25:1
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck
operations
116
6
19:1
Maintenance, inspection, testing
244
4
61:1
Office, warehouse,
accommodation, catering
114
0
n/a
Production operations
261
3
87:1
20
1
20:1
4
0
n/a
Transport – Land
52
6
9:1
Transport – Water,
incl. marine activity
79
2
40:1
Unspecified – other
124
1
124:1
Diving, subsea, ROV
Seismic/survey operations
Transport – Air
Table 23: Ratio of fatalities to lost time injuries by activity
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
52
2.11 Causal factors
The 2014 data submission requested allocation of ‘causal factors’ to fatal incidents
and high potential events. This request was first made in 2010, therefore a
comparison of five years of data is possible.
To standardize the response an IOGP list of causal factors and a glossary was
provided to the member companies as part of the IOGP user guide. The causal
factors list is divided into two sections:
• People (Acts) classifications usually involve either the actions of a person
or actions which were required but not carried out or were incorrectly
performed. There are four major categories of actions, with an additional
level of detail under each of the major categories.
• Process (Conditions) classifications usually involve some type of physical
hazard or organizational aspect out of the control of the individual. There are
five major classification categories, with an additional level of detail under
each of the major categories.
2.11.1 Fatal incident causal factors
Causal factors are divided into two separate groups, People (Acts) and Process
(Conditions), see Report 2014su Safety data reporting users' guide – 2014 data and
Glossary for details.
• 33 of the 42 fatal incidents reported were assigned causal factors
(34 of 43 in 2013)
• 176 causal factors were assigned for the 42 fatal incidents
• Between 1 and 13 causal factors were assigned per incident (between 2
and 16 in 2013).
Causal factor group
PEOPLE (ACTS)
PROCESS (CONDITIONS)
2014
2013
75
95
101
127
Table 24: Causal factors assigned to fatal incidents (2013 & 2014)
2. Key performance indicators
53
The causal factors assigned to fatal incidents are shown in Table 25. The
highlighted content indicates the top ten causal factors assigned to fatal incidents
in 2014 compared with the previous four years. Seven of the top ten were the same
for all five years.
Additional information on the fatal incidents reported by region can be found
on the IOGP Safety Zone website: http://info.iogp.org/Safety/. The information
provided includes a narrative description of the incident, the corrective actions and
recommendations and the causal factors assigned by the reporting company.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
54
Causal factors
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate work standards/procedures
18
15
15
8
10
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
18
13
17
15
30
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate training/competence
16
21
13
10
13
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)
14
12
13
9
16
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgement
13
16
11
16
14
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate supervision
13
14
16
18
18
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)
9
11
13
9
12
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used
improperly
8
7
4
6
1
PEOPLE: Use of tools, equipment, materials and products: Improper use/position of
tools/equipment/materials/products
6
10
7
6
9
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate communication
6
8
6
9
12
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers
6
10
6
11
7
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices
5
5
5
6
5
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing
5
9
5
6
4
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)
5
2
4
4
12
PEOPLE: Use of tools, equipment, materials and products: Servicing of energized
equipment/inadequate energy isolation
4
3
3
3
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Failure to warn of hazard
4
6
4
8
7
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate design/specification/
management of change
4
4
7
5
10
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems
3
1
4
2
2
PROCESS: Organizational: Poor leadership/organizational culture
3
6
4
4
9
PROCESS: Organizational: Failure to report/learn from events
3
1
1
3
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Equipment or materials not secured
3
8
4
4
6
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress
3
4
5
7
5
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or
safety devices
2
3
2
2
2
5
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Inadequate use of safety systems
2
7
9
4
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Work or motion at improper speed
1
2
1
2
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Improper lifting or loading
1
4
7
2
8
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads
1
3
4
7
1
2
1
1
5
2
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)
2
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Storms or acts of nature
2
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment
4
5
5
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate/defective tools/
equipment/materials/products
9
7
5
4
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion
4
4
2
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Acts of violence
2
1
6
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Use of drugs or alcohol
1
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Fatigue
1
1
Causal factors are listed in order of frequency for 2014. The top 10 causal factors assigned to fatal incidents for each year are
highlighted in yellow.
2014: three causal factors were equal 9th with six assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted)
2013: two causal factors were equal 10th with nine assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted)
2012: four causal factors were equal 9th with seven assigned incidents (12 factors are highlighted)
Table 25: Causal factors assigned to fatal incidents (2010–2014)
2. Key performance indicators
55
2.11.2 High potential event causal factors
• 86 of the 141 high potential events were assigned causal factors (124 of 179 in 2013)
• 336 causal factors were assigned for the 86 high potential events (444 in 2013)
• Between 1 and 12 causal factors were assigned per event (between 1 and 16 in 2013).
Causal factor group
2014
2013
PEOPLE (ACTS)
119
134
PROCESS (CONDITIONS)
217
310
Table 26: Causal factors assigned to high potential events (2013 & 2014)
The causal factors assigned to high potential events are shown in Table 27. The highlighted content
indicates the top ten causal factors assigned to high potential events in 2014 compared with the
previous four years. Six of the top ten were the same for all five years.
Additional information on the high potential events reported by region can be found on the IOGP
Safety Zone website: http://info.iogp.org/Safety/. The information provided includes a narrative
description of the event, the corrective actions and recommendations and the causal factors
assigned by the reporting company.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
56
Causal factors
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate work standards/procedures
35
44
54
20
37
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or risk assessment
28
35
61
24
47
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate maintenance/inspection/testing
26
29
37
12
21
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate design/specification/
management of change
23
29
16
18
13
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate communication
22
26
36
15
19
PROCES: Organizational: Inadequate supervision
21
24
44
18
31
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Improper decision making or lack of judgement
21
24
38
21
23
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual or group)
17
11
23
15
27
PROCESS: Organizational: Inadequate training/competence
17
29
36
15
22
PEOPLE: Use of Tools, equipment, materials & products: Improper use/position of tools/
equipment/materials/products
16
22
21
17
9
PROCESS: Tools, equipment, materials & products: Inadequate/defective tools/
equipment/materials/products
14
28
27
13
16
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Equipment or materials not secured
13
9
15
9
3
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Violation intentional (by individual or group)
10
9
7
6
9
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective guards or protective barriers
8
21
22
9
10
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Lack of attention/distracted by other concerns/stress
6
11
21
8
15
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Failure to warn of hazard
6
12
31
13
9
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Inadequate use of safety systems
5
9
19
12
2
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Personal Protective Equipment not used or used
improperly
5
4
8
3
6
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective warning systems/safety devices
5
14
8
15
13
PROCESS: Organizational: Failure to report/learn from events
5
4
3
2
4
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Hazardous atmosphere (explosive/toxic/asphyxiant)
4
3
6
5
6
PROCESS: Organizational: Poor leadership/organizational culture
4
9
10
9
15
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Improper position (in the line of fire)
4
8
13
3
9
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Work or motion at improper speed
4
2
5
3
3
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Improper lifting or loading
4
5
11
9
5
PEOPLE: Use of protective methods: Disabled or removed guards, warning systems or
safety devices
3
2
4
3
1
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Inadequate surfaces, floors, walkways or roads
3
2
5
2
5
PROCESS: Workplace hazards: Storms or acts of nature
2
3
2
2
PEOPLE: Following procedures: Overexertion or improper position/posture for task
2
2
1
1
3
PEOPLE: Use of Tools, equipment, materials & products: Servicing of energized
equipment/inadequate energy isolation
2
3
5
3
6
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Fatigue
1
1
1
4
4
2
1
PEOPLE: Inattention/lack of awareness: Acts of violence
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate security provisions or systems
2
4
3
1
PROCESS: Protective systems: Inadequate/defective Personal Protective Equipment
4
2
1
3
PROCESS: Work place hazards: Congestion, clutter or restricted motion
4
5
3
3
Causal factors are listed in order of frequency for 2014. The top 10 causal factors assigned to high potential events for each year are
highlighted in yellow.
2010: two causal factors were equal 10th with 15 assigned incidents (11 factors are highlighted)
Table 27: Causal factors assigned to high potential events (2010–2014)
2. Key performance indicators
57
The following eight causal factors were common to the top ten for both fatal
incidents and high potential events in 2014.
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/
procedures
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or
risk assessment
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/lack of awareness: Improper decision making or
lack of judgement
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Following procedures: Violation unintentional (by individual
or group)
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Use of tools, equipment, materials and products: Improper
use/position of tools/equipment/materials/products
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate communication.
The following five causal factors appear consistently in the top ten for both fatal
incidents and high potential events for 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate training/competence
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Inattention/lack of awareness: Improper decision making or
lack of judgement
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate work standards/
procedures
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate supervision
• PROCESS (CONDITIONS): Organizational: Inadequate hazard identification or
risk assessment.
The 4th most common causal factor for fatal incidents, which did not show in the
top ten for high potential events was:
• PEOPLE (ACTS): Following procedures: Improper position (line of fire).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
58
2.12 Life-Saving Rules
IOGP has released a set of Life-Saving Rules (OGP Life-Saving Rules, Report 459),
intended for use by the oil and gas industry to mitigate risk and reduce fatalities.
Each Life-Saving Rule consists of a simple icon and descriptive text, providing
clear, simple and consistent communication about risks in the workplace.
These rules were developed by using the fatal incident and high potential event
data from the 1991 to 2010 safety performance indicators reports to identify
the events and activities that are the highest risk and therefore provide clear
instructions on how to mitigate against these risks. The Life-Saving Rules are
split into eight ‘Core Rules’ and ten ‘Supplementary rules’ (previously called
'Supplemental Rules').
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Personal
Safety
8.
10.
11.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
12.
13.
Driving
Site Safety
7.
9.
Control of
Work
Figure 44: Life-Saving Rules (from IOGP Report 459)
Assessment of the applicability of the Life-Saving Rules to fatal incident
descriptions for 2014 data shows that at least 78% of the fatal incidents reported
are covered by the Life-Saving Rules and may have been prevented by the adoption
of this system. Insufficient information was provided to be able to assign a rule for
six of the incidents.
2. Key performance indicators
59
Insufficient information to
assign a Rule 17%
Core Rule 38%
No appropriate Rule 5%
Supplementary Rule 40%
Figure 45: Percentage of fatal incidents applicable to Life-Saving Rules (2014)
Insufficient information to
assign a Rule 16.7%
No appropriate Rule 4.8%
PPE (Including flotation device)
2.4%
Overhead power lines 2.4%
Line of fire – safe area 14.3%
Lift plan 2.4%
Gas test 2.4%
Confined space 2.4%
Isolation 4.8%
Journey management 9.5%
Permit to work 7.1%
Speeding/phone 2.4%
Work at height 11.9%
Dropped objects 16.7%
Figure 46: Percentage of Life-Saving Rules allocated to fatal incidents (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Rule
60
Incidents
Confined space
1
Isolation
2
Journey management
4
Permit to work
3
Seat belt
0
Speeding/phone
1
Suspended load
0
Work at height
5
Dropped objects
7
Drugs and alcohol
0
Excavation
0
Gas test
1
Lift plan
1
Line of fire – safe area
6
Overhead power lines
1
PPE (including flotation device)
1
Smoking
0
System override
0
No appropriate Rule
2
Insufficient information to assign a Rule
7
Overall
42
Table 28: Life-Saving Rules allocated to fatal incidents (2014)
3. Results by region
61
3. Results by region
In this section the safety performance of the contributing IOGP Members is
presented for regions and individual countries within those regions.
A list of countries from which companies have reported information and the
division of countries into regions is provided in Appendix D.
NORTH
AMERICA
FSU
EUROPE
ASIA/
AUSTRALASIA
MIDDLE
EAST
AFRICA
SOUTH &
CENTRAL
AMERICA
Figure 47: Region map for IOGP data reports
3.1 Fatalities
Table 29 shows the number of fatal incidents and fatalities in each of the seven
regions into which the data are partitioned.
Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in section 3.5, where five-year
rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions.
Region
Africa
Asia/Australasia
Fatalities
2014
FAR
Fatal Incidents
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
5
27
0.86
4.53
5
9
11
8
1.02
0.87
10
7
Europe
4
9
1.04
2.26
4
5
FSU
2
3
0.81
1.25
2
3
Middle East
2
4
0.33
0.63
2
4
16
12
1.56
2.03
14
10
5
17
1.13
4.37
5
5
45
80
1.03
2.12
42
43
North America
South & Central America
Overall
Table 29: Fatalities, fatal incidents and fatal accident rate by region (2013 & 2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
62
3.2 Fatal accident rate (FAR)
Further analysis of the fatality statistics is presented in section 3.5, where five-year
rolling averages of FAR are presented for each of the regions.
Region
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Africa
0.86
4.53
2.83
1.25
3.38
Asia/Australasia
1.02
0.87
1.35
3.28
4.14
Europe
1.04
2.26
0.52
0.87
0.97
FSU
0.81
1.25
0.55
1.59
2.17
Middle East
0.33
0.63
1.95
1.74
1.63
North America
1.56
2.03
7.50
1.50
5.08
South & Central America
1.13
4.37
0.54
2.42
1.57
Overall
1.03
2.12
2.38
1.88
2.76
Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)
Table 30: Fatal accident rate by region (2010–2014)
8
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 48: Fatal accident rate by region (2010–2014)
Definitions
Fatal accident rate (FAR)
The number of company/contractor fatalities per 100 million hours worked.
Overall
3. Results by region
63
3.3 Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
Submissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered out,
leaving a database of 3 909 million hours, 90% of the database (see Appendix A).
Region
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Africa
1.02
1.05
1.14
1.22
1.40
Asia/Australasia
1.01
0.97
1.37
1.46
1.30
Europe
2.58
2.58
2.64
2.81
3.05
FSU
0.59
0.81
0.99
0.99
1.08
Middle East
0.86
0.90
1.02
0.78
0.98
North America
2.40
2.58
2.82
3.19
2.89
South & Central America
2.82
3.13
3.05
3.17
2.76
Overall
1.54
1.60
1.74
1.77
1.68
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Table 31: Total recordable inury rate by region (2010–2014)
3.5
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Overall
Figure 49: Total recordable injury rate by region (2010–2014)
Definitions
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases + restricted work day cases +
medical treatment cases) per million hours worked.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
64
3.4 Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
Further analysis of the lost time injuries is presented in section 3.5, where
5-year rolling averages of LTIF are presented for each of the regions, 100% of the
database (see Appendix A).
Region
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Africa
0.29
0.31
0.33
0.30
0.36
Asia/Australasia
0.17
0.15
0.26
0.30
0.29
Europe
0.81
1.02
0.91
1.08
1.06
FSU
0.18
0.33
0.28
0.31
0.31
Middle East
0.17
0.21
0.24
0.18
0.25
North America
0.39
0.74
0.94
0.59
0.48
South & Central America
0.77
0.85
0.69
0.64
0.61
Overall
0.36
0.45
0.48
0.43
0.42
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Table 32: Lost time injury frequency by region (2010–2014)
1.2
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Overall
Figure 50: Lost time injury frequency by region (2010–2014)
Definitions
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work day cases) per million hours worked.
3. Results by region
65
3.5 FAR, TRIR and LTIF 5-year rolling averages
In order to smooth out variability in the annual values for the regional TRIR, FAR
and LTIF, five-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more
reliable indicator of performance trends.
The five-year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of
incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for
these years. For example, the five-year rolling average for 2014 is calculated by:
(Number of injuries in 2010+2011+2012+2013+2014)
(Total work hours in 2010+2011+2012+2013+2014)
The number series involved in the calculation is frame-shifted along by one each
year, e.g. 2013 is calculated from 2009–2013 data.
The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF five-year rolling averages for each of the
regions, and includes the ‘overall’ curve.
FAR five-year rolling average (per 100 million hours)
The increase in the North America five-year rolling average FAR for 2012 can be
attributed to the effect of a gas leak and explosion following the loss of mechanical
integrity of a pipeline in Mexico (onshore) in which 31 individuals lost their lives.
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
5
North
America
South &
Central
America
Overall
4
3
2
1
2009
2010
2011
2012
Figure 51: FAR five-year rolling average (2009–2014)
2013
2014
TRIR five-year rolling average (per million hours)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
66
Middle
East
North
America
5
South &
Central
America
Overall
4
3
2
1
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
LTIF five-year rolling average (per million hours)
Figure 52: TRIR five-year rolling average (2009–2014)
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
2.0
North
America
South &
Central
America
Overall
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2009
2010
2011
2012
Figure 53: LTIF five-year rolling average (2009–2014)
2013
2014
3. Results by region
67
3.6 Severity of lost work day cases
The number of days lost was reported for 71% of lost work day cases.
The severity of lost work day cases is the highest in the FSU region compared with
the other regions (65 days lost per LWDC in 2014). This represents a 54% increase
compared with the average for the previous five-year period.
Appendix A provides further information on the proportion of the database which
can be used for lost work day case severity, 96% of the data submitted for South
& Central America was usable for this metric, in comparison with only 53% of
equivalent data for Europe.
Average days lost per LWDC
Region
2014
2013
2014 relative to
2013 severity
2014 relative to
2009–2013 severity
Africa
33.2
29.2
# 14% higher
# 17% higher
Asia/Australasia
31.0
30.4
# 2% higher
# 11% higher
Europe
33.8
42.3
$ 20% lower
$ 16% lower
FSU
64.8
51.0
# 27% higher
# 54% higher
Middle East
34.6
13.6
# 154% higher
# 91% higher
North America
49.2
49.6
$ 1% lower
# 24% higher
South & Central America
49.1
60.3
$ 19% lower
$ 32% lower
Overall
42.2
43.0
$ 2% lower
# 2% higher
Table 33: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2014 compared to 2009–2013)
Definitions
Lost work day case (LWDC)
An incident resulting in at least one day off work. Fatal incidents are not included.
Severity of lost work day cases
The number of days lost (where reported) for each lost work day case (LWDC).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
68
80
2014
2009–2013
Average days lost per LWDC
70
2014 Overall
60
50
42.2
40
30
20
10
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 54: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2014 compared to 2009–2013)
3. Results by region
69
3.7 Individual country performance
The safety performance reported by participating IOGP member companies of
individual countries is presented in terms of the lost time injury frequency of
companies jointly with contractors. To preserve the anonymity of companies,
performance is only published for those countries for which at least two
companies have reported statistics. Countries with less than 50 000 work hours
reported are excluded, since results for such small populations of hours would be
unrepresentative. Overall averages and regional averages include data from all
countries regardless of work hours or number of contributing companies.
Of the 111 countries from which data have been reported, 31 are excluded by these
constraints. The chart of relative LTIF performance for the remaining 80 countries
compares the 2014 performance with that of 2013 and 2012.
The majority of countries in Africa, Asia/Australasia, FSU and the Middle East
achieved an LTIF equal to or lower than the overall average LTIF (0.36). The
majority of countries in Europe, North America and South & Central America show
an LTIF higher than the global average.
TRIR calculations exclude data where medical treatment cases are not reported.
The chart of relative TRIR performance therefore compares the 2014 performance
with that of 2013 and 2012 for 79 of the 80 countries.
The majority of countries in Africa, Asia/Australasia, FSU and Middle East achieved
a TRIR equal to or lower than the overall average TRIR (1.54). The majority of
countries in Europe, North America and South & Central America show a TRIR
higher than the global average.
For comparison, the five-year rolling average FAR is shown for each of the regions.
There appears to be little if any correlation between these values and the regional
average LTIF and TRIR values.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
70
2014 average TRIR
Five-year rolling average FAR (0.0)
2014
2013
2014 Global average TRIR
2012
Africa
Liberia
Morocco
Ivory Coast
Senegal
D.R. Congo
Kenya
Algeria
Gabon
Tunisia
Mauritania
Angola
Tanzania
Mozambique
Equatorial Guinea
Uganda
Congo
Ghana
Libya
Egypt
Nigeria
South Africa
Namibia
Madagascar
*No data were provided for Cyrpus (2014),
Malta (2013 & 2014), or Namibia (2014)
(2.6)
Asia/Australasia
New Zealand
Japan
Australia
Brunei
Papua New Guinea
India
Myanmar
Thailand
South Korea
Malaysia
Indonesia
Philippines
China
Singapore
Vietnam
Pakistan
(1.9)
(1.2)
Europe
Denmark
Malta
Germany
Ireland
Netherlands
Norway
Croatia
UK
Hungary
Cyprus
France
Spain
Romania
Italy
Poland
FSU
Russia
Kazakhstan
Azerbaijan
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
(1.4)
Middle East
Turkey
Iraq
Oman
Qatar
Yemen
Kuwait
UAE
Iran
(1.3)
North America
Canada
USA
Mexico
(3.2)
South & Central America
Venezuela
Uruguay
Brazil
Colombia
Ecuador
Argentina
Bolivia
Peru
Trinidad & Tobago
(2.0)
0
1.54
3
17.90
6
9
TRIR (per million hours worked) and FAR 5-year rolling average (per 100 million hours worked)
Figure 55: Total recordable injury rate by region (2014) and country (2012–2014) and FAR 5-year
rolling average by region (2014)
12
3. Results by region
71
2014 average LTIF
Five-year rolling average FAR (0.0)
2014
2013
2014 Global average LTIF
2012
Africa
Ivory coast
Algeria
Tunisia
Senegal
Kenya
Mauritania
Morocco
D.R. Congo
Tanzania
Gabon
Mozambique
Egypt
Congo
Angola
Equatorial Guinea
Libya
Ghana
Nigeria
South Africa
Namibia
Madagascar
Uganda
Liberia
One or more fatalities (2014) in red
*No data were provided for Malta (2013 & 2014)
(2.6)
Asia/Australasia
New Zealand
Japan
Vietnam
India
Myanmar
Australia
Pakistan
Malaysia
Papua New Guinea
China
South Korea
Thailand
Indonesia
Singapore
Brunei
Philippines
(1.9)
Europe
Cyprus
Croatia
Germany
Denmark
Norway
Ireland
Italy
UK
Netherlands
Romania
France
Spain
Hungary
Poland
Malta*
(1.2)
FSU
Russia
Kazakhstan
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
Azerbaijan
(1.4)
Middle East
Turkey
Yemen
Oman
Iraq
Kuwait
Qatar
UAE
Iran
(1.3)
North America
USA
Mexico
Canada
(3.2)
6.98
South & Central America
Venezuela
Brazil
Colombia
Peru
Argentina
Trinidad & Tobago
Ecuador
Bolivia
Uruguay
(2.0)
15.35
0
0.36
1
2
3
4
LTIF (per million hours worked) and FAR 5-year rolling average (per 100 million hours worked)
Figure 56: Lost time injury frequency by region (2014) and country (2012–2014) and FAR 5-year
rolling average by region (2014)
5
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
72
3.8 Incident triangles by region
In this section the relative numbers of types of occupational injury are shown in
the form of ‘incident triangles’. The ratios have been corrected to account for the
absence, in some data submissions, of medical treatment cases.
Definitions
Lost time injuries:
Lost work day cases and fatalities.
Recordable injuries:
Fatalities, lost work day cases, restricted work day cases and medical treatment cases where
medical treatment cases are reported for the data set.
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities:
The number of lost time injuries (LTI) divided by the total number of fatalities
(LTI/fatalities).
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
The number of recordable injuries divided by the total number of fatalities
(recordable injuries/fatalities).
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
34:1
116:1
2013
7:1
23:1
2012
12:1
40:1
2011
24:1
97:1
Table 34: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities – Africa
(2011–2014)
1
n/a
Fatalities = 0
1
34
31
116
Overall
105
Company
Contractor
Figure 57: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Africa (2014)
Fatality
Lost time
injuries
Recordable
injuries
3. Results by region
73
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
17:1
97:1
2013
17:1
107:1
2012
19:1
101:1
2011
9:1
43:1
Table 35: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
Asia/Australasia (2011–2014)
n/a
1
1
Fatalities = 0
17
15
97
89
Overall
Company
Fatality
Lost time
injuries
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 58: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Asia/Australasia (2014)
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
78:1
239:1
2013
45:1
113:1
2012
175:1
507:1
2011
124:1
316:1
Table 36: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
Europe (2011–2014)
1
1
78
35
239
90
Overall
Company
1
Fatality
121
Lost time
injuries
389
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 59: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Europe (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
74
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
22:1
72:1
2013
27:1
65:1
2012
52:1
180:1
2011
19:1
62:1
Table 37: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
FSU (2011–2014)
n/a
1
Fatalities = 0
22
72
1
Fatality
19
Lost time
injuries
61
Overall
Company
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 60: Incident triangles by company & contractor – FSU (2014)
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
53:1
255:1
2013
34:1
141:1
2012
12:1
52:1
2011
10:1
45:1
Table 38: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
Middle East (2011–2014)
1
n/a
1
Fatalities = 0
53
45
255
224
Overall
Company
Fatality
Lost time
injuries
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 61: Incident triangles by company & contractor – Middle East (2014)
3. Results by region
75
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
25:1
96:1
2013
36:1
116:1
2012
13:1
35:1
2011
40:1
213:1
Table 39: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
North America (2011–2014)
1
1
1
Fatality
25
28
25
Lost time
injuries
96
63
104
Overall
Company
Contractor
Recordable
injuries
Figure 62: Incident triangles by company & contractor – North America (2014)
Year
Ratio of lost time injuries to fatalities
Ratio of total recordable injuries to fatalities
2014
68:1
247:1
2013
19:1
72:1
2012
129:1
570:1
2011
26:1
131:1
Table 40: Ratio of lost time injuries and recordable injuries to fatalities –
South & Central America (2011–2014)
1
n/a
1
Fatalities = 0
68
62
247
226
Overall
Company
Fatality
Lost time
injuries
Recordable
injuries
Contractor
Figure 63: Incident triangles by company & contractor – South & Central America (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
76
4. Results by function
In this section the safety performance within different functions performed in
the E&P industry is presented. Functions are defined as ‘exploration’, ‘drilling’,
‘production’, ‘construction’ and ‘unspecified’. The category ‘other’ is no longer in
use. See the Glossary of terms for definitions.
The percentage of the total work hours reported under each function has been
detailed below. See Appendix B for further data.
Function
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
3
3
2
2
2
Drilling
16
15
18
19
15
Production
37
35
33
35
28
Construction
23
25
25
24
25
Unspecified
21
23
22
20
29
Exploration
Table 41: Percentage of total work hours reported under each function (2010–2014)
4.1 Fatalities
The distribution of company and contractor fatal incidents and fatalities between
the functions is shown for both 2014 and 2013.
Function
2014
2013
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
1
1
3
3
Drilling
17
19
15
15
Production
14
15
17
33
Construction
8
8
6
18
Unspecified
2
2
2
11
42
45
43
80
Exploration
Overall
Table 42: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents by function (2013 & 2014)
4. Results by function
77
4.2 FAR, LTIF and TRIR – five-year rolling averages
In order to smooth out variability in the annual values for the regional TRIR, FAR
and LTIF, five-year rolling averages are computed which should provide a more
reliable indicator of performance trends.
The five-year rolling average is calculated by summing the total number of
incidents of the five previous years, and dividing by the sum of the work hours for
these years. For example, the five-year rolling average for 2014 is calculated by:
(Number of fatalities in function in 2010+2011+2012+2013+2014)
(Total work hours in function 2010+2011+2012+2013+2014)
The number series involved in the calculation is frame-shifted along by one each
year, e.g. 2013 is calculated from 2009–2013 data.
FAR five-year rolling average (per 100 million hours)
The figures show TRIR, FAR and LTIF five-year rolling averages for each of the
regions, and include the ‘overall’ curve.
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction*
Unspecified
Overall
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
*The 2009 5-year rolling average for ‘construction’ is not available as the category was used for the first time in 2006, replacing the function ‘other’.
Figure 64: FAR five-year rolling average by function (2009–2014)
The increase in the 2010 drilling FAR can be attributed to the effect of a fire and
explosion offshore in the USA in which 11 individuals lost their lives.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
78
TRIR five-year rolling average (per million hours)
For the calculation of TRIR results, submissions without information on medical
treatment cases were filtered out, leaving a database of 3 909 million hours, 90% of
the database (see Appendix A).
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction*
Unspecified
Overall
5
Overall
Unspecifi
4
Construc
3
Productio
2
Drilling
Explorati
1
0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
*The 2009 5-year rolling average for ‘construction’ is not available as the category was used for the first time in 2006, replacing the function ‘other’.
LTIF five year rolling average (per million hours)
Figure 65: TRIR five-year rolling average by function (2009–2014)
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction*
Unspecified
Overall
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
*The 2009 5-year rolling average for ‘construction’ is not available as the category was used for the first time in 2006, replacing the function ‘other’.
Figure 66: LTIF five-year rolling average by function (2009–2014)
3. Results by region
79
Average days lost per LWDC
4.3 Severity of lost work day cases (LWDC)
60
2014
2009–2013
50
2014 Overall
42.2
40
30
20
10
0
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
Figure 67: Average severity of lost work day cases by function (2014 compared with
2009–2013)
The overall severity based on the number of days lost per lost work day case (LWDC)
is 42.2 in 2014 (43.0 in 2013). Offshore the LWDC severity is 45.5 days lost per LWDC
compared with 39.9 days for onshore activities (51.2 and 35.8 respectively for 2013).
See section 2.8 for additional information and Section 3.6 for LWDC severity by region.
4.4 Exploration performance
4.4.1 Total recordable injury rate – exploration
Definitions
Exploration
Geophysical, seismographic and geological operations, including their administrative and
engineering aspects, construction, maintenance, materials supply and transportation of
personnel and equipment; excludes drilling.
Figures 68 and 69 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for exploration
related activities, in different regions of the world.
103 million work hours (87% of reported exploration work hours) were used in
this analysis, of which company activities represent 20% and contractor activities
represent 80%. This is an increase of 15 million work hours compared with 2013
(88 million work hours in 2013; 22% company, 78% contractor).
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
80
In 2014 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in
exploration activities are 0.39 and 1.75 respectively; the overall average TRIR for
exploration activities is 1.48.
Company total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
The total recordable injury rates for companies operating in the FSU show a
strong increase, this is against a relatively small number of work hours
(0.25 million work hours).
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0.39
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 68: Total recordable injury rate for companies engaged in exploration
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1.75
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 69: Total recordable injury rate for contractors engaged in exploration
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
4. Results by function
81
4.4.2 Lost time injury frequency – exploration
Figures 70 and 71 show the LTIF for companies and contractors for exploration
related activities, in different regions of the world. The 2014 result is compared
with average LTIF results in the previous five-year period.
118 million work hours (100% of reported exploration work hours) were used in
this analysis of which company activities represent 21% and contractor activities
represent 79%. This is an increase of 23 million work hours compared with 2013
(24% company, 76% contractor in 2013).
In 2014 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in
exploration activities are 0.00 and 0.37 respectively; the overall average LTIF for
exploration activities is 0.30.
Company lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Company LTIF values associated with exploration show an LTIF of zero (no
fatalities or LWDC reported) in all regions in 2014.
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.00
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 70: Lost time injury frequency for companies engaged in exploration
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0.37
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 71: Lost time injury frequency for contractors engaged in exploration
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
82
4.5 Drilling performance
Definitions
Drilling
All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and workover as well as their administrative,
engineering, construction, materials supply and transportation aspects. It includes site
preparation, rigging up and down and restoration of the drilling site upon work completion.
Drilling includes ALL exploration, appraisal and production drilling.
4.5.1 Total recordable injury rate – drilling
Figures 72 and 73 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for drilling related
activities in different regions of the world.
603 million work hours (85% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this
analysis of which company activities represent 9% and contractor activities represent
91%. This represents an increase of 50 million work hours compared with 2013, with
a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (12% to 88% respectively).
In 2014 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling
activities are 0.92 and 2.97 respectively; the overall TRIR for drilling activities is 2.78.
Company total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
4. Results by function
83
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.92
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 72: Total recordable injury rate for companies engaged in drilling activities –
by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
2.97
3
2
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 73: Total recordable injury rate for contractors engaged in drilling activities –
by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
84
4.5.2 Lost time injury frequency – drilling
706 million work hours (100% of reported drilling work hours) were used in this
analysis, of which company activities represent 14% and contractor activities
represent 86%. This represents an increase of 126 million work hours compared
with 2013, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities.
Figures 74 and 75 show the LTIF for companies and contractors in drilling
related activities in different regions of the world. In 2014 the overall LTIF for both
companies and contractors engaged in drilling activities is 0.78.
Company lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
In 2014 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in drilling
activities are 0.55 and 0.82 respectively.
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.55
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 74: Lost time injury frequency for companies engaged in drilling activities –
by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.82
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 75: Lost time injury frequency for contractors engaged in drilling activities –
by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
4. Results by function
85
4.6 Production performance
Definitions
Production
Petroleum and natural gas producing operations, including their administrative and
engineering aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance and servicing, materials
supply, and transportation of personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream production
operations including wireline. It does not cover production drilling and workover.
See Appendix E: Glossary of Terms for details.
4.6.1 Total recordable injury rate – production
Figures 76 and 77 show the TRIR for companies and contractors for production
related activities in different regions of the world.
1 398 million work hours (85% of reported production work hours) were used
in this analysis, of which company activities represent 26% and contractor
activities represent 74%. This represents an increase of 119 million work hours
compared with 2013, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities
(27% to 73% respectively).
In 2014 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in
production activities are 1.35 and 1.89 respectively; the overall average TRIR for
production activities is 1.75.
Company total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
86
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1.35
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 76: Total recordable injury rate for companies engaged in production
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1.89
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 77: Total recordable injury rate for contractors engaged in production
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
4. Results by function
87
4.6.2 Lost time injury frequency – production
Figures 78 and 79 show the LTIF for companies and contractors for production
related activities in different regions of the world.
1 629 million work hours (100% of reported production work hours) were used in
this analysis of which company activities represent 27% and contractor activities
represent 73%. This is an increase of 316 million work hours compared with 2013,
with the same ratio of company to contractor activities.
Company lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
In 2014 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in
production activities are 0.33 and 0.43 respectively; the overall average LTIF for
production activities is 0.40.
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.33
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 78: Lost time injury frequency for companies engaged in production
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0.43
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 79: Lost time injury frequency for contractors engaged in production
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
88
4.7 Construction performance
Definitions
Construction
All major construction, fabrication activities and also disassembly, removal and disposal
(decommissioning) at the end of the facility life. Includes construction of process plant, yard
construction of structures, offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and removal of
redundant process facilities.
The company and contractor results for 2014 construction performance are
presented below.
Construction activities are predominately conducted by contractors therefore the
work hours reported for contractors are much greater than those reported for
company employees. Refer to Appendix B for detailed information.
4.7.1 Total recordable injury rate – construction
934 million work hours (93% of reported construction work hours) were used in
this analysis of which company activities represent 7% and contractor activities
represent 93%. This is an increase of 11 million work hours compared with 2013,
with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (8% to 92% respectively).
In 2014 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in
construction activities are 0.23 and 1.14 respectively; the overall average TRIR for
construction activities is 1.08.
Company total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
4. Results by function
89
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.23
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 80: Total recordable injury rate for companies engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1.14
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 81: Total recordable injury rate for contractors engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
2009-2013
2014
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
90
4.7.2 Lost time injury frequency – construction
1 001 million work hours (100% of reported construction work hours) were used
in this analysis of which company activities represent 7% and contractor activities
represent 93%. This represents an increase of 71 million work hours compared
with 2013, with a similar ratio of company to contractor activities (8% to 92%
respectively).
Company lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
In 2014 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in
construction activities are 0.06 and 0.17 respectively; the overall average LTIF for
construction activities is 0.17.
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.06
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 82: Lost time injury frequency for companies engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.17
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 83: Lost time injury frequency for contractors engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
4. Results by function
91
4.8 Unspecified performance
Definitions
Unspecified
Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated with office personnel who’s work hours
and incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to the administrative support of one of the
function groupings of exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead
support function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples where
work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function.
4.8.1 Total recordable injury rate – unspecified
871 million work hours (95% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in
this analysis, of which company activities represent 32% and contractor activities
represent 68%. This represents an increase of 49 million work hours compared
with 2013, with a similar ratio company to contractor activities (33% to 67%
respectively in 2013).
In 2014 the overall TRIR values for companies and contractors engaged in activities
where the work function was not specified are 0.52 and 1.00 respectively; the
overall average TRIR for unspecified activities is 0.85.
Company total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
92
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.52
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 84: Total recordable injury rate for companies engaged in unspecified
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1.00
1
0
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 85: Total recordable injury rate for contractors engaged in unspecified
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
2009-2013
2014
4. Results by function
93
4.8.2 Lost time injury frequency – unspecified
912 million work hours (100% of work hours reported as unspecified) were used in
this analysis of which company activities represent 34% and contractor activities
represent 66%. This represents an increase of 60 million work hours compared
with 2013, with the same ratio of company to contractor activities.
In 2014 the overall LTIF values for companies and contractors engaged in activities
in the ‘unspecified’ work function are 0.14 and 0.19 respectively; the overall
average LTIF for unspecified activities is 0.17.
Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function in 2014 were two contractor fatalities
with 43 company and 109 contractor lost work day cases.
Company lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Reported under the ‘unspecified’ function from 2009 to 2013 were 31 company and
72 contractor fatalities with 333 company and 950 contractor lost work day cases.
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.14
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Contractor lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 86: Lost time injury frequency for companies engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
6
2014
2009–2013
5
2014 Overall
4
3
2
1
0
0.19
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle East
North
America
South &
Central
America
Figure 87: Lost time injury frequency for contractors engaged in construction
activities – by region (2014 compared with 2009–2013)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
94
5. Results by company
This section compares the safety performance of individual companies with each
other and with their performance in previous years.
5.1 Overall company results
For reasons of anonymity each of the 52 companies that has contributed relevant
data and is to be included in this analysis has been allocated a unique code
letter (A to ZZ). These codes change every year in line with LTIF performance. All
companies reported both company and contractor data. Results for all of the 52
participating companies are therefore shown in this section. In 2014 IOGP member
companies reported 40 contractor and five company employee fatalities.
5.1.1 Fatal accident rate
In the figure below the FAR is presented for those companies that, with their
contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours reported. Twenty-two
companies met this criterion in 2014, compared with 20 companies in 2013.
Companies are shown in rank order of company-with-contractor FAR.
Sixteen of the 22 companies with their contractors performed below the overall
average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million work hours
reported (1.13).
Fatal accident rate (per 100 million hours worked)
Sixteen of the 22 companies suffered one or more fatalities.
Company with contractors
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
4
3
2
1.13
1
0
Y
HH W
S
E
D
Z
I
PP NN LL FF EE AA QQ DD MM KK CC V
Figure 88: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors with
>50 million joint hours – fatal accident rate
TT UU
5. Results by company
95
5.1.2 Total recordable injury rate
The TRIR for companies together with their contractors is presented below. Data
are only included where Medical Treatment Cases (MTC) are reported. Fifty-one of
the 52 participating companies qualified for inclusion in this section. Company W
did not provide MTC data and is excluded from the TRIR analysis.
The TRIR for company alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for company and
contractors jointly. Details of results are tabulated in Appendix B.
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
In six instances, contractors achieved a lower TRIR than the companies they were
employed by.
Company with contractors
Company only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
7
Compan
6
Compan
5
4
3
2
1.54
1
0
B H T A C L N E O G ZZ D K
I
J P RR BB X XX U Q JJ R VV SS NN MM V PP M AA F
II S FF DD CC QQ Z UU Y KK LL OO EE HH TT GG WW YY
Figure 89: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined – total recordable injury rate
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
In Figure 90 the TRIR for contractors alone is plotted alongside the TRIR for
company and contractors jointly.
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
7
Contrac
6
Compan
5
4
3
2
1.54
1
0
B H T A C L N E O G ZZ D K
I
J P RR BB X XX U Q JJ R VV SS NN MM V PP M AA F
II S FF DD CC QQ Z UU Y KK LL OO EE HH TT GG WW YY
Figure 90: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined – total recordable injury rate
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
96
In the figures below the TRIR is presented for those companies that, with their
contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours. Twenty one companies met
this criterion in 2014, compared with the 20 in 2013. Companies are shown in rank
order of the company-with-contractor TRIR for companies alone vs. companywith-contractor TRIR and for contractors alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR.
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Seventeen of the 21 companies with their contractors performed below the overall
average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million work hours
reported (1.50).
Company with contractors
Company only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
5
Compa
Compa
4
3
2
1.50
1
0
E
D
I
NN
MM
V
PP
AA
S
FF
DD
CC
QQ
Z
UU
Y
KK
LL
EE
HH
TT
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 91: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours >50 million – total recordable injury rate
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
5
Contrac
Compa
4
3
2
1.50
1
0
E
D
I
NN
MM
V
PP
AA
S
FF
DD
CC
QQ
Z
UU
Y
KK
LL
EE
HH
Figure 92: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours >50 million – total recordable injury rate
TT
5. Results by company
97
The remaining 30 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than
50 million work hours are presented below in rank order of the company-withcontractor TRIR for companies alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR and for
contractors alone vs. company-with-contractor TRIR.
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Twenty three of the 30 companies with their contractors performed above the
overall average for smaller companies with contractors (1.58).
Company with contractors
Company only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
7
Compan
6
Compan
5
4
3
2
1.58
1
0
B
H
T
A
C
L
N
O
G
ZZ
K
J
P
RR BB
X
XX
U
Q
JJ
R
SS VV
M
F
II
OO GG WW YY
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 93: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours <=50 million – total recordable injury rate
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
7
Contractor on
6
Company with
5
4
3
2
1.58
1
0
B
H
T
A
C
L
N
O
G
ZZ
K
J
P
BB
X
XX
U
Q
JJ
R
SS
VV
M
F
II
OO GG WW YY
Figure 94: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined joint hours <=50 million – total recordable injury rate
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
98
5.1.3 Lost time injury frequency
The figure shows the LTIF in rank order for companies together with their
contractors. All of the 52 participating companies (A to ZZ) contributed both
company and contractor data, although not always for every country in which
operations were conducted. Data for all 52 participating companies are therefore
included in this section.
The LTIF for the company alone and contractors alone is plotted alongside the LTIF
for company and contractors jointly. The incidence of a fatality in either company
or contractor operations is also indicated*. Details of results are tabulated in
Appendix B.
• 46 companies with their contractors delivered a LTIF of less than one
• 23 of the 52 companies presented below suffered one or more fatality
• In eight instances, contractors achieved a lower LTIF than the companies they
were employed by.
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
5. Results by company
Company with contractors
Company only
99
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
3
Compa
Compa
2
1
0.36
0
A B C D E F G H I
*
* *
* *
J K L M N O P Q R S T U V
* *
*
*
*
X
Y
*
Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ
* *
* * *
*
*
*
* *
*
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 95: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined – lost time injury frequency
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
3
Contrac
Compa
2
1
0.36
0
A
B C
*
D E F G
* *
H I M K J L N O P
* * * * *
S Q R T
*
U V
*
Y X
*
Z BB AA CC FF DD EE GG II JJ HH LL KK MM NN PP OO QQ RR SS TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ
*
*
* * *
* *
* *
*
*
Figure 96: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined – lost time injury frequency
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
100
In figures 97 and 98 below the LTIF is presented for those companies that,
with their contractors, reported more than 50 million work hours. Twenty two
companies met this criterion in 2014, compared with 20 companies in 2013.
Companies are shown in rank order of the company-with-contractor LTIF.
• 1
6 of the 22 companies with their contractors performed below the overall
average for companies with contractors reporting more than 50 million work
hours reported (0.34).
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
• 16 of the 22 companies suffered one or more fatalities.
Company with contractors
Company only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
2.0
Compan
Compan
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 D*
0.34
E*
I*
S*
V
W*
Y*
Z*
AA*
CC
DD*
EE*
FF*
HH*
KK
LL*
MM
NN*
PP*
QQ*
TT
UU
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 97: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours >50 million – lost time injury frequency
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
2.0
Contractor on
Company wit
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 D*
0.34
E*
I*
S*
V
W*
Y*
Z*
AA*
CC
DD*
EE*
FF*
HH*
KK
LL*
MM
NN*
PP*
QQ*
TT
Figure 98: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours >50 million – lost time injury frequency
UU
5. Results by company
101
The remaining 30 companies which, with their contractors, reported less than 50
million work hours reported are presented below in rank order of the companywith-contractor LTIF.
• 12 of the 30 companies with their contractors performed below the overall
average for smaller companies with contractors (0.43).
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
• Six of the 30 smaller companies presented below suffered one or more
fatalities.
Company with contractors
Company only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
3
Compa
Compa
2
1
0.43
0
A
B*
C
F
G
H*
J*
K*
L
M*
N
O
P
Q
R
T
U*
X
BB GG
II
JJ OO RR SS* VV WW XX
YY
ZZ
Lost time injury frequency (per million hours worked)
Figure 99: Performance ranking of companies vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours <=50 million – lost time injury frequency
Company with contractors
Contractor only
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors *2014 Fatality
3
Contractor on
Company with
2
1
0.43
0 A
B*
C
F
G
H*
J*
K*
L
M*
N
O
P
Q
R
T
U*
X
BB GG
II
JJ OO RR SS* VV WW XX
YY
ZZ
Figure 100: Performance ranking of contractors vs. companies with contractors
combined, joint hours <=50 million – lost time injury frequency
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
102
5.2 Company results by function
Results of companies together with their contractors have been analysed by
function to allow more in-depth benchmarking between companies. The TRIR
indicator has been selected, and the ranked results are shown in the following
charts. Only companies that provided data by function are included, and then only
those companies that reported more than 100 000 hours worked. Results against
smaller numbers of hours would not have statistical significance. The company
code letters are the same as used elsewhere in this section.
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Exploration was the only function where the top quartile company with contractors
shows a TRIR of zero. It is also the function with the smallest number of work
hours reported (3% of the total in 2014, see Appendix A).
Company with contractors
12
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
13.22
10
8
6
4
2
0
1.48
I
V RR C
A
U
X
Q XX E
K AA DD KK NN II R
S
P BB O CC Y
D
F EE QQ G
H HH JJ L LL PP T
TT Z
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 101: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors –
exploration – total recordable injury rate
Company with contractors
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
12
10
8
6
4
2.78
2
0
H D ZZ KK A K G T O N E I XX U J P NN C RR II F L CC R V S Q VV FF JJ DD SS X TT AA QQ M HH EE Z LL Y PP UU YY
Figure 102: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors – drilling –
total recordable injury rate
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
5. Results by company
Company with contractors
Top quartile
103
2014 Overall companies with contractors
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
1.75
C
T
A
L
E
P D
X
O VV H G
I
K JJ NN RR Q
J AA F PP SS V DD FF S
II EE OO R TT QQ U CC HH Y LL UU M Z KK WW GG ZZ
Total recordable injury rate (per million hours worked)
Figure 103: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors –
production – total recordable injury rate
Company with contractors
Top quartile
2014 Overall companies with contractors
12 16.61
10
8
6
4
2
0
1.08
A
O
G
R
JJ K
P
H
C
M
V
D
L
II RR PP AA QQ Y
SS UU LL U
Z NN GG S
DD CC FF EE HH KK WW TT F
Figure 104: Performance ranking of companies jointly with contractors –
construction – total recordable injury rate
T
VV X
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
104
Appendix A
Database dimensions
Company
Contractor
Number of work hours (millions)
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2014
Figure A.1: Work hours reported by company and contractor (1985–2014)
Data type
Work hours reported (thousands)
Onshore
Offshore
Overall
719 829
225 743
945 572
Contractor
2 419 208
1 001 179
3 420 387
Overall
3 139 037
1 226 922
4 365 959
Company
Table A.1: Work hours reported by data type and operations (2014)
The database for the year 2014 covers 4 365 959 000 work hours reported in the
exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry. The database is 16%
larger than it was in 2013.
• 72% of the hours reported were associated with onshore activities, 28% with
offshore activities
• 111 countries are represented in the database, one more than in the 2013
database. Countries are listed in Appendix D
• 52 companies contributed data, of which all companies contributed
contractor statistics, though not in every case for each country of operation
• Of the 52 companies, 50 had contributed data in 2013 which accounted for
98% of the database in 2013 and 98% of the database in 2014. Forty five of the
companies submitting 2014 data also provided data in 2012
• 25 of the companies contributed 90% of the hours. Seven companies between
them covered 50% of the hours, and the largest contributor accounted for 11%
• 22% of the reported work hours were related to company personnel and 78%
were related to contractors.
Appendix A
105
A summary of the key elements of the database is shown in the table at the end of
this section.
South & Central America 10%
Africa 13%
North America 23%
Asia/Australasia 25%
Middle East 14%
Europe 9%
FSU 6%
Figure A.2: Percentage of work hours reported by region (2014)
South & Central America 10%
Africa 16%
North America 16%
Asia/Australasia 24%
Middle East 17%
FSU 6%
Figure A.3: Percentage of work hours reported by region (2013)
Europe 11%
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
106
Exploration 3%
Unspecified 21%
Drilling 16%
Construction 23%
Production 37%
Figure A.4: Percentage of work hours reported by function (2014)
Exploration 2%
Drilling 15%
Unspecified 23%
Construction 25%
Production 35%
Figure A.5: Percentage of work hours reported by function (2013)
‘Unspecified (as a work function)’ is used for the entry of data associated with
office personnel whose work hours and incident data cannot be reasonably
assigned to the administrative support of one of the function groupings of
exploration, drilling, production or construction. Corporate overhead support
function personnel such as finance or human resources staff may be examples
where work hours cannot be specifically assigned to a particular function. All other
data that are not separated out by function are reported as ‘unspecified’.
Appendix A
107
Proportion of database used in analysis
For calculations of FAR, Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours, and LTIF:
• All hours in the database were used.
For calculations of TRIR:
• S
ubmissions without information on medical treatment cases were filtered
out, leaving a database of 3 909 million hours, 90% of the database.
• In 2013, the TRIR database was 3 651 million hours, 99% of the total
database.
• T
he region where the smallest proportion of the database could be used was
North America (62%).
For calculations of lost work day case severity:
• S
ubmissions without information on days off work were filtered out, leaving a
database of 3 213 million hours, 74% of the total database.
• In 2013, this database was 2 625 million hours, 70% of the total database.
• E
urope has only 53% severity information respectively, whereas 96% of the
South & Central America database was useable.
For calculations of restricted work day case severity:
• S
ubmissions without information on days assigned to restricted activities
were filtered out, leaving a database of 2 151 million hours (49% of the total
database), and 854 restricted work day cases, 58% of the total reported in
2014 (1 473 RWDC).
• In 2013 this database was 2 088 million hours, 55% of the total database.
More detailed information is shown in Tables A.2–A.5.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
108
Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis
TRIR
Lost work day case
severity
Restricted work
day case severity
Africa
98%
84%
62%
Asia/Australasia
98%
78%
59%
Europe
96%
53%
43%
FSU
99%
73%
47%
Middle East
98%
74%
49%
North America
62%
61%
22%
South & Central America
99%
96%
78%
Region
Table A.2: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses by region
Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis
TRIR
Lost work day case
severity
Restricted work
day case severity
Exploration
87%
79%
46%
Drilling
85%
77%
47%
Production
85%
75%
48%
Construction
93%
70%
51%
Unspecified
95%
70%
50%
Function
Table A.3: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses by function
Percentage of reported work hours included in analysis
Overall
TRIR
Lost work day case
severity
Restricted work
day case severity
90%
74%
49%
Table A.4: Percentage of reported work hours included in analyses overall
Percentage of reported work hours included in RWDC severity analysis
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
60%
58%
58%
55%
64%
Table A.5: Percentage of reported RWDC included in RWDC severity calculations
Appendix B
109
Appendix B - Data tables
Region
Data type
Africa
Company
Contractor
Operations
Hours worked
(thousands)
Asia/Australasia
Europe
FSU
Contractor
MIddle East
Contractor
North America
South & Central
America
Contractor
9
5
11
0.00
0.10
0.29
16
9
0.00
0.45
1.86
Onshore
349 144
3
93
58
113
0.86
0.27
0.77
Contractor
Overall
Contractor
Grand Total
2
56
93
110
1.59
0.46
2.09
5
166
172
243
0.86
0.29
1.02
Onshore
132 135
0
14
8
35
0.00
0.11
0.45
41 953
0
7
11
13
0.00
0.17
0.76
Onshore
668 811
6
99
207
435
0.90
0.16
1.12
234 936
5
55
92
91
2.13
0.26
1.05
1 077 835
11
175
318
574
1.02
0.17
1.01
Onshore
105 478
2
42
19
42
1.90
0.42
1.03
Offshore
33 477
0
26
11
41
0.00
0.78
2.36
Onshore
112 994
1
72
51
91
0.89
0.65
2.01
Offshore
133 386
1
167
122
274
0.75
1.26
4.24
385 335
4
307
203
448
1.04
0.81
2.59
Onshore
47 806
0
4
0
16
0.00
0.08
0.43
Offshore
9 852
0
2
1
0
0.00
0.20
0.30
Onshore
154 631
2
36
24
36
1.29
0.25
0.64
Offshore
36 039
0
0
14
9
0.00
0.00
0.64
248 328
2
42
39
61
0.81
0.18
0.59
Onshore
84 262
0
12
5
31
0.00
0.14
0.60
Offshore
10 278
0
4
4
8
0.00
0.39
1.56
Onshore
451 696
2
79
91
219
0.44
0.18
0.87
Offshore
61 718
0
9
15
35
0.00
0.15
0.96
607 954
2
104
115
293
0.33
0.17
0.86
Onshore
220 723
0
56
37
101
0.00
0.25
1.15
Offshore
76 633
3
25
5
12
3.91
0.37
1.38
Onshore
505 655
11
216
321
684
2.18
0.45
2.99
Offshore
222 243
2
91
44
70
0.90
0.42
1.87
1 025 254
16
388
407
867
1.56
0.39
2.40
Onshore
41 569
0
15
10
33
0.00
0.36
1.43
Offshore
35 711
0
17
0
28
0.00
0.48
1.27
Onshore
176 277
3
145
129
188
1.70
0.84
2.65
Offshore
187 232
2
159
80
426
1.07
0.86
3.57
440 789
5
336
219
675
1.13
0.77
2.82
719 829
2
152
84
269
0.28
0.21
0.77
Subtotal
Company
125 625
580 464
Offshore
Subtotal
Company
TRIR
8
Subtotal
Company
LTIF
0
Subtotal
Company
FAR
0
Subtotal
Company
MTCs
(number)
87 856
Offshore
Contractor
RWDCs
(number)
17 839
Subtotal
Company
LWDCs
(number)
Onshore
Offshore
Contractor
(number)
Offshore
Subtotal
Company
Fatalities
Onshore
Offshore
225 743
3
89
48
111
1.33
0.41
1.40
Onshore
2 419 208
28
740
881
1766
1.16
0.32
1.47
Offshore
1 001 179
12
537
460
1015
1.20
0.55
2.31
4 365 959
45
1 518
1 473
3 161
1.03
0.36
1.54
Table B.1: Summary of 2014 data
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Hours worked
(thousands)
Company
Contractor
Fatalities
LWDCs
110
RWDCs
MTCs
FAR
LTIF
TRIR
945 572
5
241
132
380
0.53
0.26
0.90
3 420 387
40
1 277
1 341
2 781
1.17
0.39
1.70
Onshore
3 139 037
30
892
965
2 035
0.96
0.29
1.33
Offshore
1 226 922
15
626
508
1 126
1.22
0.52
2.16
Table B.2: Summary of 2014 data, company, contractor, onshore, offshore
The following data are presented in relation to the sections where they were used.
Section 1 Summary
Intentionally excluded.
Section 2 Overall results
Year
Company
2005
1.25
2006
2.04
2007
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
4.36
3.53
3.94
1.99
4.54
3.92
4.64
1.58
1.65
3.39
2.99
3.01
2.92
2008
2.81
3.20
3.12
3.38
2.25
2009
1.58
3.11
2.76
2.75
2.78
2010
3.17
2.64
2.76
2.62
3.16
2011
1.33
2.03
1.88
1.94
1.67
2012
1.58
2.59
2.38
2.87
0.89
2013
1.83
2.20
2.12
1.70
3.27
2014
0.53
1.17
1.03
0.96
1.22
945 572
3 420 387
4 365 959
3 139 037
1 226 922
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
Hours 2014 (thousands)
Contractor
Table B.3: Fatal accident rate (2005–2014)
Year
Company
2005
1.72
3.96
3.36
3.62
2.38
2006
1.91
4.04
3.51
4.10
1.58
2007
1.35
2.85
2.51
2.74
1.69
2008
2.53
2.47
2.48
2.71
1.72
2009
1.22
2.06
1.87
1.86
1.90
2010
1.10
1.86
1.70
1.70
1.69
2011
0.80
1.63
1.45
1.57
1.03
2012
0.79
1.57
1.41
1.58
0.89
2013
0.85
1.22
1.14
0.94
1.68
2014
0.32
1.14
0.96
0.92
1.06
945 572
3 420 387
4 365 959
3 139 037
1 226 922
Hours 2014 (thousands)
Contractor
Table B.4: Fatal incidents per 100 million work hours (2005–2014)
Appendix B
Year
Company
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
2005
1.76
3.50
3.05
2.82
3.87
2006
1.85
3.24
2.92
2.68
3.66
2007
2.41
2.76
2.68
2.51
3.26
2008
1.49
2.23
2.08
1.75
3.09
2009
1.28
1.89
1.75
1.45
2.79
2010
1.19
1.81
1.68
1.41
2.45
2011
1.32
1.88
1.76
1.45
2.84
2012
1.12
1.90
1.74
1.49
2.53
2013
0.95
1.77
1.60
1.33
2.34
2014
Hours 2014 (thousands)
Contractor
111
0.90
1.70
1.54
1.33
2.16
779 552
3 132 246
3 908 798
2 902 277
1 006 521
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
Table B.5: Total recordable injury rate (2005–2014)
Year
Company
2005
0.83
1.02
0.97
0.92
1.12
2006
0.89
1.03
0.99
0.95
1.13
2007
0.54
0.70
0.66
0.62
0.82
2008
0.52
0.56
0.55
0.47
0.81
2009
0.44
0.46
0.45
0.38
0.70
2010
0.41
0.42
0.42
0.35
0.62
2011
0.42
0.43
0.43
0.34
0.74
2012
0.47
0.49
0.48
0.38
0.81
2013
0.40
0.47
0.45
0.34
0.77
2014
0.26
0.39
0.36
0.29
0.52
945 572
3 420 387
4 365 959
3 139 037
1 226 922
Hours 2014 (thousands)
Contractor
Table B.6: Lost time injury frequency (2005–2014)
Category
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
% of total
Assault or violent act
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Caught in, under or between
0
7
7
4
3
15.6
Confined space
0
1
1
1
0
2.2
Cut, puncture, scrape
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Explosions or burns
3
6
9
6
3
20.0
Exposure electrical
2
1
3
2
1
6.7
Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Falls from height
0
5
5
1
4
11.1
Overexertion, strain
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Pressure release
0
1
1
1
0
2.2
Slips and trips (at same height)
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Struck by
0
15
15
13
2
33.3
Water related, drowning
0
3
3
1
2
6.7
Other
0
1
1
1
0
2.2
Overall
5
40
45
30
15
Table B.7: Fatalities by category (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Activity
Company
112
Contractor
Onshore
Offshore
% of total
6
5
1
13.3
0
0
0
0
0.0
3
13
16
9
7
35.6
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck
operations
0
6
6
3
3
13.3
Maintenance, inspection, testing
2
2
4
3
1
8.9
Office, warehouse,
accommodation, catering
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Production operations
0
3
3
2
1
6.7
Construction, commissioning,
decommissioning
0
6
Diving, subsea, ROV
0
Drilling, workover, well services
Overall
Seismic/survey operations
0
1
1
1
0
2.2
Transport – Air
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Transport – Land
0
6
6
6
0
13.3
Transport – Water, incl. marine
activity
0
2
2
0
2
4.4
Unspecified – other
0
1
1
1
0
2.2
Overall
5
40
45
30
15
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
Table B.8: Fatalities by activity (2014)
Category
Assault or violent act
Caught in, under or between
Company
% of total
2
8
10
8
2
0.7
34
308
342
181
161
22.5
Confined space
0
1
1
1
0
0.1
Cut, puncture, scrape
9
65
74
41
33
4.9
Explosions or burns
7
48
55
37
18
3.6
Exposure electrical
3
14
17
6
11
1.1
Exposure noise, chemical,
biological, vibration
2
12
14
10
4
0.9
Falls from height
30
144
174
109
65
11.5
Overexertion, strain
14
78
92
53
39
6.1
1
6
7
3
4
0.5
Pressure release
Slips and trips (at same height)
72
204
276
171
105
18.2
Struck by
56
297
353
195
158
23.3
1
0
1
1
0
0.1
6.7
Water related, drowning
Other
Overall
10
92
102
76
26
241
1 277
1 518
892
626
Table B.9: Lost work day cases by category (2014)
Appendix B
Activity
Company
Construction, commissioning,
decommissioning
Diving, subsea, ROV
Drilling, workover, well services
113
Contractor
Overall
7
131
138
98
40
9.1
1
8
9
4
5
0.6
40
340
380
234
146
25.0
5
105
110
45
65
7.2
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations
Onshore
Offshore
% of total
Maintenance, inspection, testing
37
203
240
105
135
15.8
Office, warehouse, accommodation,
catering
31
83
114
76
38
7.5
Production operations
74
184
258
180
78
17.0
Seismic/survey operations
0
19
19
16
3
1.3
Transport – Air
1
3
4
2
2
0.3
Transport – Land
9
37
46
41
5
3.0
Transport – Water, incl. marine activity
4
73
77
10
67
5.1
32
91
123
81
42
8.1
241
1 277
1 518
892
626
Unspecified – other
Overall
Table B.10: Lost work day cases by activity (2014)
Year
Average number of days lost per LWDC
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
Offshore
2005
25.6
23.7
24.2
24.5
23.1
2006
20.6
26.2
24.9
24.7
25.5
2007
32.7
35.6
35.0
33.0
42.0
2008
35.2
34.6
34.7
32.1
41.0
2009
35.3
38.3
37.5
34.8
44.4
2010
35.4
46.0
43.9
39.4
52.6
2011
41.1
42.6
42.3
39.8
46.4
2012
38.8
41.3
40.7
36.8
46.0
2013
43.5
42.9
43.0
35.8
51.2
2014
51.6
40.3
42.2
39.9
45.5
Table B.11: Lost work day case severity (2014)
Year
Average number of days lost per LWDC
Company
Contractor
Overall
Onshore
2005
12.5
13.8
13.7
14.7
9.6
2006
11.8
11.1
11.2
10.3
13.0
2007
15.3
10.5
10.9
8.9
16.0
2008
16.1
13.4
13.7
13.3
14.4
2009
15.3
13.8
13.9
12.4
15.8
2010
14.7
13.8
13.9
13.6
14.4
2011
12.9
10.2
10.4
11.7
8.6
2012
13.8
12.1
12.2
11.5
13.4
2013
17.2
14.2
14.5
15.4
13.0
2014
14.6
11.6
11.8
12.2
11.2
Table B.12: Restricted work day case severity (2014)
Offshore
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Rule
114
Fatal incidents
Core Rule
Confined space
1
yes
Isolation
2
yes
Journey management
4
yes
Permit to work
3
yes
Seat belt
0
yes
Speeding/phone
1
yes
Suspended load
0
yes
Work at height
5
yes
Dropped objects
7
Drugs and alcohol
0
Excavation
0
Gas test
1
Lift plan
1
Line of fire – safe area
6
Overhead power lines
1
PPE (Including flotation device)
1
Smoking
0
System override
0
No appropriate Rule
2
Insufficient information to assign a Rule
7
Overall
42
Table B.13: Life-Saving Rules attributable to fatal incidents (2014)
Section 3 Results by region
Region
Fatalities
FAR
Fatal Incidents
2014
2013
2014
2013
2014
2013
5
27
0.86
4.53
5
9
11
8
1.02
0.87
10
7
Europe
4
9
1.04
2.26
4
5
FSU
2
3
0.81
1.25
2
3
Middle East
2
4
0.33
0.63
2
4
16
12
1.56
2.03
14
10
Africa
Asia/Australasia
North America
South & Central America
Overall
5
17
1.13
4.37
5
5
45
80
1.03
2.12
42
43
Table B.14: Fatalities, fatal incidents and fatal accident rate by region (2013 & 2014)
Appendix B
115
Region
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Africa
0.86
4.53
2.83
1.25
3.38
Asia/Australasia
1.02
0.87
1.35
3.28
4.14
Europe
1.04
2.26
0.52
0.87
0.97
FSU
0.81
1.25
0.55
1.59
2.17
Middle East
0.33
0.63
1.95
1.74
1.63
North America
1.56
2.03
7.50
1.50
5.08
South & Central America
1.13
4.37
0.54
2.42
1.57
Overall
1.03
2.12
2.38
1.88
2.76
Table B.15: Fatal accident rate by region (2010–2014)
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2009
1.65
1.22
3.48
1.21
0.92
3.08
3.17
1.75
2010
1.40
1.30
3.05
1.08
0.98
2.89
2.76
1.68
2011
1.22
1.46
2.81
0.99
0.78
3.19
3.17
1.77
2012
1.14
1.37
2.64
0.99
1.02
2.82
3.05
1.74
2013
1.05
0.97
2.58
0.81
0.90
2.58
3.13
1.60
2014
1.02
1.01
2.58
0.59
0.86
2.40
2.82
1.54
Year
Table B.16: Total recordable injury rate by region (2009–2014)
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2009
0.42
0.29
1.31
0.35
0.26
0.51
0.69
0.45
2010
0.36
0.29
1.06
0.31
0.25
0.48
0.61
0.42
2011
0.30
0.30
1.08
0.31
0.18
0.59
0.64
0.43
2012
0.33
0.26
0.91
0.28
0.24
0.94
0.69
0.48
2013
0.31
0.15
1.02
0.33
0.21
0.74
0.85
0.45
2014
0.29
0.17
0.81
0.18
0.17
0.39
0.77
0.36
Year
Table B.17: Lost time injury frequency by region (2009–2014)
Thousand work hours
Year
Africa
2005
472 879
2006
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
348 806
191 127
443 782
383 968
224 603
315 505
2 380 670
473 646
473 100
282 856
451 036
447 657
302 632
506 047
2 936 974
2007
496 830
540 809
296 407
418 534
553 424
285 769
321 028
2 912 801
2008
499 818
562 677
310 258
444 115
835 031
304 046
348 223
3 304 168
2009
542 110
697 524
319 176
350 794
1 018 682
320 541
337 015
3 585 842
2010
562 121
725 171
308 870
461 827
676 337
295 339
381 479
3 411 144
2011
558 573
609 466
344 762
439 420
690 171
400 902
412 784
3 456 078
2012
600 478
741 523
384 668
363 944
666 915
560 027
373 485
3 691 040
2013
595 637
919 063
398 820
240 596
637 244
590 089
389 097
3 770 546
2014
580 464
1 077 835
385 335
248 328
607 954
1 025 254
440 789
4 365 959
Table B.18: Work hours reported by region (2005–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
116
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2005
7.0
2.1
3.5
6.6
4.9
4.5
3.8
4.7
2006
6.6
1.8
3.5
6.3
4.3
4.0
3.9
4.4
2007
6.0
1.5
3.0
5.5
4.2
3.6
3.8
4.1
2008
5.1
1.4
3.5
5.2
3.6
2.8
3.9
3.7
2009
4.1
1.4
4.6
4.4
2.8
2.4
3.7
3.2
2010
3.8
2.1
4.0
3.7
2.5
3.1
3.3
3.1
2011
2.9
2.3
3.4
2.9
2.3
2.7
2.9
2.7
2012
2.8
2.3
2.5
2.3
2.0
4.4
2.4
2.6
2013
2.9
2.1
2.2
1.8
1.7
4.1
2.3
2.4
2014
2.6
1.9
1.2
1.4
1.3
3.2
2.0
2.0
Year
Table B.19: Fatal accident rate five-year rolling averages by region (2005–2014)
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2005
3.0
2.1
6.4
1.9
3.6
6.5
5.2
3.8
2006
3.0
1.9
6.0
1.9
3.3
5.7
4.5
3.4
2007
2.9
1.7
5.3
2.2
3.0
5.2
4.1
3.2
2008
2.8
1.6
4.7
2.1
1.9
4.9
3.8
2.8
2009
2.2
1.4
4.3
1.9
1.5
4.4
3.5
2.4
2010
2.0
1.4
3.9
1.8
1.3
4.0
3.2
2.2
2011
1.7
1.3
3.4
1.6
1.1
3.6
3.1
2.0
2012
1.5
1.3
3.1
1.1
0.9
3.2
3.1
1.8
2013
1.3
1.2
2.9
1.0
0.9
2.9
3.1
1.7
2014
1.2
1.2
2.7
0.9
0.9
2.7
3.0
1.7
Year
Table B.20: Total recordable injury rate five-year rolling averages by region (2005–2014)
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2005
0.8
0.5
2.0
0.8
1.2
1.2
2.3
1.2
2006
0.7
0.4
1.8
0.8
1.0
1.0
2.2
1.1
2007
0.7
0.4
1.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
2.0
1.0
2008
0.7
0.3
1.5
0.7
0.6
0.8
1.7
0.8
2009
0.6
0.3
1.5
0.6
0.4
0.7
1.4
0.7
2010
0.5
0.3
1.4
0.5
0.4
0.6
1.2
0.6
2011
0.5
0.3
1.2
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.5
2012
0.4
0.3
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.5
2013
0.3
0.3
1.1
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.7
0.5
2014
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.7
0.4
Year
Table B.21: Lost time injury frequency five-year rolling averages by region (2005–2014)
Appendix B
Year
117
Average number of days lost per LWDC
Africa
Asia/
Australasia
Europe
FSU
Middle
East
North
America
South & Central
America
Overall
2009
23.1
31.8
42.3
32.6
20.4
38.9
68.9
37.5
2010
27.2
27.6
32.8
42.2
14.7
46.6
98.5
43.9
2011
27.6
26.7
44.5
46.4
12.3
31.3
71.6
42.3
2012
35.9
24.2
38.1
41.4
26.2
36.7
69.5
40.7
2013
29.2
30.4
42.3
51.0
13.6
49.6
60.3
43.0
2014
33.2
31.0
33.8
64.8
34.6
49.2
49.1
42.2
Table B.22: Severity of lost work day cases by region (2009–2014)
Country
2014
2013
2012
Liberia
8.58
0.00
5.24
Morocco
4.53
9.62
4.67
Ivory coast
4.18
2.74
8.33
Senegal
4.08
0.00
0.00
D.R. of the Congo (formerly Zaire)
3.05
2.33
2.54
Kenya
2.53
4.29
2.59
Algeria
2.32
1.81
1.27
Gabon
1.90
2.35
2.29
Tunisia
1.77
3.38
3.38
Mauritania
1.63
3.10
1.25
Angola
1.40
1.10
1.48
Tanzania
1.35
2.03
3.47
Mozambique
1.22
1.52
2.75
Equatorial Guinea
1.19
1.34
1.50
Africa average
1.02
Uganda
1.01
1.71
2.43
Congo
0.95
0.82
1.38
Ghana
0.91
1.95
1.91
Libya
0.84
0.97
0.91
Egypt
0.71
0.77
0.71
Nigeria
0.35
0.31
0.51
South Africa
0.00
4.43
2.51
Namibia
0.00
0.00
n/a
Madagascar
0.00
0.00
4.10
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.23: Total recordable injury rate by country – Africa (2012–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Country
118
2014
2013
2012
New Zealand
5.05
11.06
10.87
Japan
4.83
0.44
1.47
Australia
2.08
2.64
4.45
Brunei
1.55
0.00
1.37
0.91
1.61
0.63
1.51
Papua New Guinea
1.46
Asia-Australasia average
1.01
India
1.00
Myanmar
1.00
1.01
1.81
Thailand
0.96
0.89
1.11
South Korea
0.91
0.59
0.85
Malaysia
0.57
0.72
0.88
Indonesia
0.46
0.49
0.59
Philippines
0.46
0.19
0.93
China
0.38
0.66
0.51
Singapore
0.33
2.43
0.00
Vietnam
0.32
0.35
2.08
Pakistan
0.25
0.35
1.05
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.24: Total recordable injury rate by country – Asia/Australasia (2012–2014)
Country
2014
2013
2012
Denmark
7.39
6.07
5.04
Malta
5.29
n/a
n/a
Germany
4.86
4.17
4.51
Ireland
3.74
3.95
2.11
Netherlands
3.39
2.71
2.48
Norway
3.25
3.05
2.99
Croatia
3.06
3.55
1.59
Europe average
2.58
UK
2.30
2.54
2.83
Hungary
2.03
1.28
3.12
Cyprus
1.88
0.00
n/a
France
1.08
0.99
0.49
Spain
1.06
0.98
1.29
Romania
0.90
0.83
1.08
Italy
0.80
1.01
1.62
Poland
0.00
3.47
6.11
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.25: Total recordable injury rate by country – Europe (2012–2014)
Appendix B
119
Country
2014
2013
2012
Russia
0.80
0.72
1.14
FSU average
0.59
Kazakhstan
0.54
0.80
0.84
Azerbaijan
0.40
1.24
0.81
Turkmenistan
0.19
0.11
0.64
Ukraine
0.00
2.62
3.55
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.26: Total recordable injury rate by country – FSU (2012–2014)
Country
2014
2013
2012
Turkey
4.53
0.86
3.48
Iraq
1.53
2.11
2.52
Oman
1.24
0.73
2.17
Qatar
0.94
1.04
1.17
Middle East average
0.86
Yemen
0.84
1.05
1.28
Kuwait
0.72
0.32
0.83
UAE
0.53
1.00
0.74
Iran
0.00
0.00
0.00
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported..
Table B.27: Total recordable injury rate by country – Middle East (2012–2014)
Country
2014
2013
2012
Canada
2.49
2.63
2.91
North America average
2.40
USA
2.37
2.57
2.80
Mexico
0.00
0.00
0.00
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.28: Total recordable injury rate by country – North America (2012–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Country
120
2014
2013
2012
Venezuela
6.04
1.27
0.84
Uruguay
5.68
17.90
0.00
Brazil
3.13
3.35
3.21
South & Central America average
2.82
Colombia
2.69
1.24
2.23
Ecuador
2.49
1.61
2.13
Argentina
2.05
1.74
1.91
Bolivia
1.73
2.27
3.24
Peru
1.55
4.70
4.32
Trinidad & Tobago
1.33
2.08
2.25
Data only included in TRIR calculations where medical treatment cases are reported.
Table B.29: Total recordable injury rate by country – South & Central America (2012–2014)
Country
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
2014
Ivory Coast
2.79
0.00
3.33
No
Algeria
1.53
1.00
0.24
Yes
Tunisia
1.07
1.47
1.61
Yes
Senegal
1.02
0.00
0.00
No
Kenya
0.99
0.83
0.43
No
Mauritania
0.82
0.77
0.63
No
Morocco
0.57
4.81
4.67
No
D.R. of the Congo (Formerly Zaire)
0.54
0.97
0.63
No
Tanzania
0.45
1.27
0.87
No
Gabon
0.39
0.57
0.70
No
0.35
0.78
No
0.26
0.27
No
Mozambique
0.30
Africa Average
0.29
Egypt
0.25
Congo
0.24
0.15
0.34
Yes
Angola
0.23
0.16
0.23
No
Equatorial Guinea
0.22
0.45
0.32
No
Libya
0.19
0.31
0.54
No
Ghana
0.15
0.60
1.43
No
Nigeria
0.10
0.10
0.15
Yes
South Africa
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Namibia
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Madagascar
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Uganda
0.00
0.50
0.37
No
Liberia
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Table B.30: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) by country – Africa
Appendix B
Country
121
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
2014
New Zealand
1.25
2.07
3.11
No
Japan
0.60
0.44
0.00
No
Vietnam
0.32
0.17
0.52
No
India
0.30
0.15
0.43
No
Myanmar
0.28
0.27
0.46
Yes
Australia
0.22
0.27
0.64
Yes
Pakistan
0.22
0.03
0.05
Yes
Malaysia
0.20
0.17
0.27
Yes
Papua New Guinea
0.19
0.04
0.13
No
China
0.17
0.23
0.26
Yes
South Korea
0.17
0.17
0.34
No
Asia-Australasia average
0.17
Thailand
0.12
0.04
0.11
No
Indonesia
0.08
0.09
0.16
Yes
Singapore
0.04
0.35
0.00
No
Brunei
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Philippines
0.00
0.00
0.37
No
Table B.31: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – Asia/Australasia
Country
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
Cyprus
1.88
0.00
N/A
2014
No
Croatia
1.68
1.75
1.38
No
Germany
1.43
1.68
0.92
Yes
Denmark
1.24
0.39
1.04
No
Norway
1.04
1.13
0.98
No
Ireland
0.83
1.08
0.00
No
Europe average
0.81
Italy
0.75
1.01
1.55
No
UK
0.70
1.11
0.82
Yes
Netherlands
0.68
0.75
0.65
No
Romania
0.40
0.47
0.60
Yes
France
0.33
0.56
0.27
No
Spain
0.27
0.49
0.64
No
Hungary
0.25
0.64
1.76
No
Poland
0.00
0.00
3.66
No
Malta
0.00
N/A
N/A
No
Table B.32:Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – Europe
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Country
122
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
2014
Russia
0.27
0.50
0.27
Yes
Kazakhstan
0.18
0.29
0.33
No
FSU average
0.18
Turkmenistan
0.09
0.00
0.32
No
Ukraine
0.00
0.00
3.55
No
Azerbaijan
0.00
0.21
0.11
No
Table B.33: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – FSU
Country
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
2014
Turkey
2.28
0.00
2.61
Yes
Yemen
0.35
0.36
0.43
No
Oman
0.31
0.00
0.00
No
Iraq
0.20
0.27
1.15
No
Kuwait
0.18
0.14
0.12
No
Qatar
0.17
0.25
0.26
Yes
Middle East average
0.17
Uae
0.06
0.19
0.16
No
Iran
0.00
0.00
0.00
No
Table B.34: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – Middle East
Country
LTIF
Fatality
2014
2013
2012
2014
Usa
0.44
0.58
0.56
Yes
North America average
0.39
Mexico
0.37
3.14
6.98
Yes
Canada
0.32
0.25
0.35
Yes
Table B.35: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – North America
Country
LTIF
2014
2013
Fatality
2012
2014
Venezuela
2.12
0.84
0.21
No
Brazil
0.84
0.90
0.78
Yes
Colombia
0.78
0.15
0.35
Yes
Peru
0.77
2.03
0.62
No
South & Central America average
0.77
Argentina
0.48
0.29
0.15
Yes
Trinidad & Tobago
0.37
0.43
0.63
No
Ecuador
0.36
0.36
0.16
No
Bolivia
0.26
0.22
0.76
No
Uruguay
0.00
15.35
0.00
No
Table B.36: Lost time injury frequency (2012–2014) – South & Central America
Appendix B
123
Section 4 Results by function
2014
Function
2013
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
Fatal incidents
Fatalities
1
1
3
3
Drilling
17
19
15
15
Production
Exploration
14
15
17
33
Construction
8
8
6
18
Unspecified
2
2
2
11
42
45
43
80
Overall
Table B.37: Number of fatalities and fatal incidents in 2013 & 2014 by function
Hours (thousands)
Function
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Exploration
117 859
95 197
84 947
74 306
83 397
Drilling
706 179
579 757
672 728
642 462
518 505
Production
1 628 568
1 313 488
1 220 365
1 208 473
965 145
Construction
1 001 301
930 481
911 045
839 178
869 540
911 052
851 623
801 955
691 659
974 557
4 365 959
3 770 546
3 691 040
3 456 078
3 411 144
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
2.76
3.23
Unspecified
Overall
Table B.38: Exposure hours by function (2010–2014)
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
2009
6.15
4.24
3.76
2010
4.54
5.06
3.54
1.87
2.80
3.08
2011
1.91
3.82
3.35
1.80
2.35
2.69
2012
2.42
3.43
2.90
1.69
2.62
2.57
2013
2.50
3.19
2.58
1.71
2.30
2.38
2014
1.97
2.92
1.82
1.56
2.03
1.99
The method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been
recalculated accordingly.
Table B.39: Fatal accident rate – five-year rolling averages by function (2009–2014)
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
2009
3.26
4.59
4.85
1.49
1.65
2.76
2010
1.20
6.36
2.07
1.15
3.08
2.76
2011
0.00
1.87
2.65
1.91
0.72
1.88
2012
4.71
1.78
1.23
2.09
4.74
2.38
2013
3.15
2.59
2.51
1.93
1.29
2.12
2014
0.85
2.69
0.92
0.80
0.22
1.03
The method of calculating FAR on a functional basis has changed with the publication of 2010 data to use the incident function instead
of the function of the victim. Historic figures presented above have been recalculated accordingly.
Table B.40: Fatal accident rate by function (2009–2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
2009
2.87
4.87
2.93
2010
2.73
4.16
2.66
2011
2.74
3.62
2012
2.63
2013
2014
124
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
1.99
2.43
1.21
1.78
2.17
2.41
1.06
1.54
1.97
3.14
2.18
1.04
1.34
1.80
2.24
2.96
2.01
1.06
1.17
1.71
2.05
2.83
1.91
1.13
1.01
1.66
The method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been
recalculated accordingly.
Table B.41: Total recordable injury rate – five-year rolling averages by function (2009–2014)
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
2009
2.31
3.81
2.32
0.78
1.53
1.75
2010
2.30
2.94
2.14
0.99
1.13
1.68
2011
2.70
2.84
2.05
1.13
0.95
1.76
2012
2.14
2.59
1.92
1.32
1.21
1.74
2013
1.87
3.05
1.75
1.13
0.90
1.60
2014
1.48
2.78
1.75
1.08
0.85
1.54
Unspecified
Overall
0.55
0.70
Table B.42: Total recordable injury rate by function (2009–2014)
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
2009
0.81
1.37
0.89
2010
0.68
1.19
0.77
0.29
0.48
0.60
2011
0.60
0.96
0.64
0.25
0.35
0.50
2012
0.56
0.88
0.58
0.23
0.34
0.47
2013
0.56
0.84
0.55
0.22
0.31
0.45
2014
0.50
0.81
0.50
0.21
0.27
0.43
The method of calculating rolling averages changed with the publication of 2010 data. Historic figures presented above have been
recalculated accordingly.
Table B.43: Lost time injury frequency – five-year rolling averages by function (2009–2014)
Year
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
2009
0.47
1.02
0.64
0.21
0.36
0.45
2010
0.42
0.82
0.54
0.24
0.25
0.42
2011
0.53
0.70
0.55
0.21
0.22
0.43
2012
0.60
0.81
0.49
0.24
0.46
0.48
2013
0.74
0.94
0.53
0.21
0.24
0.45
2014
0.30
0.78
0.40
0.17
0.17
0.36
Table B.44: Lost time injury frequency by function (2009–2014)
Appendix B
Year
125
Average days lost per LWDC
Exploration
Drilling
Production
Construction
Unspecified
Overall
2009
45.5
44.3
38.4
34.7
29.9
37.5
2010
28.7
55.8
49.8
27.3
22.6
43.9
2011
42.4
51.8
40.4
36.4
22.8
42.3
2012
37.6
50.3
39.6
36.8
26.2
40.7
2013
27.0
51.4
47.5
23.7
27.7
43.0
2014
32.1
49.6
41.5
31.9
31.2
42.2
Table B.45: Severity of lost work day cases by function (2009–2014)
TRIR
Region
Company
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
Company
Contractor
2014
2009–2013
2014
2009–2013
Africa
0.00
0.57
1.29
2.11
2 931
2014
17 030
Asia/Australasia
0.19
0.51
0.89
2.30
5 298
24 731
Europe
0.00
0.83
1.53
2.45
3 781
3 272
FSU
4.05
1.69
0.44
1.43
247
4 554
Middle East
0.57
0.66
2.41
2.04
1 742
10 355
North America
0.82
0.67
2.50
4.31
6 114
11 189
South & Central America
0.00
0.76
3.58
5.46
630
11 166
Overall
0.39
0.67
1.75
2.80
20 743
82 297
Table B.46: Exploration TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
LTIF
Region
Company
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
Company
Contractor
2014
2009–2013
2014
2009–2013
2014
Africa
0.00
0.16
0.47
0.48
2 996
17 190
Asia/Australasia
0.00
0.29
0.16
0.27
5 688
25 252
Europe
0.00
0.48
0.31
1.22
4 465
3 272
FSU
0.00
0.79
0.41
0.69
247
4 925
Middle East
0.00
0.64
0.47
0.53
1 821
10 695
North America
0.00
0.08
0.10
2.03
8 262
20 716
South & Central America
0.00
0.21
1.12
0.97
722
11 608
Overall
0.00
0.30
0.37
0.65
24 201
93 658
Table B.47: Exploration LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
126
TRIR
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.66
1.03
2.07
3.06
6 019
79 235
Asia/Australasia
0.48
0.76
1.73
2.26
10 406
123 386
Europe
1.91
2.14
4.50
5.34
10 447
44 186
FSU
0.51
1.73
1.17
1.31
1 965
30 882
Middle East
0.45
1.19
3.30
2.63
4 400
39 966
North America
0.48
0.32
3.68
4.57
10 507
134 729
South & Central America
1.22
1.55
4.03
4.40
10 667
96 144
Overall
0.92
1.44
2.97
3.19
54 411
548 528
Table B.48: Drilling TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
LTIF
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.00
0.34
0.61
0.93
6 416
81 344
Asia/Australasia
0.00
0.21
0.52
0.59
10 947
126 313
Europe
0.73
1.24
1.56
2.12
10 966
44 310
FSU
0.00
0.49
0.48
0.34
2 025
31 057
Middle East
0.22
0.59
0.71
0.55
4 530
40 608
North America
0.73
1.59
0.78
0.95
56 011
184 417
South & Central America
0.55
0.51
1.27
1.11
10 936
96 299
Overall
0.55
0.79
0.82
0.85
101 831
604 348
Table B.49: Drilling LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
TRIR
Region
Company
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
Company
Contractor
2014
2009–2013
2014
2009–2013
Africa
0.92
1.14
1.07
1.17
42 525
2014
173 719
Asia/Australasia
0.79
1.16
0.69
1.15
69 995
198 939
Europe
2.00
1.92
4.04
4.46
63 047
96 326
FSU
0.33
0.70
0.66
0.70
33 137
60 560
Middle East
0.72
1.59
0.56
1.25
41 598
133 602
North America
2.47
2.84
3.29
3.61
54 567
148 516
South & Central America
1.62
2.05
2.84
2.94
52 577
228 893
Overall
1.35
1.65
1.89
2.16
357 446
1 040 555
Table B.50: Production TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
Appendix B
127
LTIF
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.18
0.32
0.34
0.32
44 990
175 816
Asia/Australasia
0.22
0.31
0.16
0.30
73 041
208 894
Europe
0.79
0.84
1.15
1.47
65 504
101 372
FSU
0.09
0.30
0.16
0.18
33 637
61 828
Middle East
0.19
0.58
0.09
0.30
42 604
137 729
North America
0.25
0.80
0.44
0.82
121 768
279 259
South & Central America
0.47
0.59
0.69
0.57
52 863
229 263
Overall
0.33
0.56
0.43
0.54
434 407
1 194 161
Table B.51: Production LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
TRIR
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.18
0.36
1.27
1.46
11 145
56 802
Asia/Australasia
0.05
0.47
1.15
1.58
19 702
373 530
Europe
0.95
0.36
2.23
2.90
7 376
53 408
FSU
0.31
0.70
0.43
0.93
3 262
53 144
Middle East
0.00
0.39
0.64
0.45
9 757
246 654
North America
0.33
0.45
2.10
2.87
9 018
73 010
South & Central America
0.00
1.24
2.85
2.77
1 472
15 429
Overall
0.23
0.47
1.14
1.10
61 732
871 977
Table B.52: Construction TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
LTIF
Region
Company
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
Company
Contractor
2014
2009–2013
2014
2009–2013
Africa
0.00
0.06
0.26
0.33
11 145
2014
56 802
Asia/Australasia
0.05
0.11
0.12
0.20
21 464
375 596
Europe
0.25
0.12
0.71
0.87
7 952
53 528
FSU
0.31
0.25
0.13
0.31
3 262
53 144
Middle East
0.00
0.14
0.07
0.11
13 984
248 471
North America
0.00
0.07
0.20
0.38
12 304
126 689
South & Central America
0.00
0.56
0.84
0.92
1 531
15 429
Overall
0.06
0.13
0.17
0.23
71 642
929 659
Table B.53: Construction LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
128
TRIR
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.32
0.53
0.57
0.85
34 507
143 100
Asia/Australasia
0.43
0.53
1.05
0.74
61 148
165 859
Europe
0.56
0.79
1.56
2.21
46 289
42 203
FSU
0.49
0.95
0.51
0.96
18 261
39 511
Middle East
0.96
0.79
0.75
1.85
31 199
75 636
North America
0.50
0.92
1.64
2.77
80 120
111 843
South & Central America
0.47
0.37
0.93
1.31
10 696
10 737
Overall
0.52
0.74
1.00
1.37
282 220
588 889
Table B.54: Unspecified TRIR by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
LTIF
Region
Company
2014
Work hours (thousands)
Contractor
2009–2013
2014
Company
2009–2013
Contractor
2014
Africa
0.22
0.14
0.15
0.20
40 148
143 617
Asia/Australasia
0.06
0.19
0.10
0.13
62 948
167 692
Europe
0.16
0.39
0.36
0.72
50 068
43 898
FSU
0.11
0.32
0.10
0.31
18 487
39 716
Middle East
0.22
0.19
0.34
0.43
31 601
75 911
North America
0.12
0.33
0.22
0.66
99 011
116 817
South & Central America
0.09
0.10
0.18
0.20
11 228
10 910
Overall
0.14
0.26
0.19
0.33
313 491
598 561
Table B.55: Unspecified LTIF by region for companies and contractors (2014 & 2009–2013) and the
number of related work hours for companies and contractors for 2014 only
Appendix B
129
Section 5 Results by company
Company code
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
OVERALL
X
Y
Z
AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
HH
II
JJ
KK
LL
MM
NN
OO
PP
QQ
RR
SS
TT
UU
VV
WW
XX
YY
ZZ
FAR
FAR Total
0.00
13.41
0.00
1.99
2.27
0.00
0.00
3.88
1.02
9.82
4.28
0.00
9.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.31
0.00
7.03
0.00
2.60
1.03
0.00
3.43
1.07
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.47
0.63
0.00
2.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.72
0.00
0.79
0.00
0.85
0.41
0.00
3.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TRIR Total
4.34
4.83
4.22
3.31
3.86
1.34
3.79
4.57
3.20
2.96
3.25
3.97
1.37
3.88
3.81
2.77
1.97
1.83
1.29
4.47
1.97
1.41
1.54
2.09
0.77
0.91
1.34
2.23
1.00
1.08
0.64
1.13
0.24
0.55
1.29
1.90
0.74
0.72
1.44
1.58
0.68
1.38
0.97
2.42
1.60
0.48
0.89
1.60
0.20
2.03
0.00
3.61
TRIR
Company
1.76
3.64
1.66
2.09
1.51
1.56
0.89
1.31
1.42
2.05
2.97
2.07
0.92
2.56
2.65
1.86
0.74
0.27
1.17
2.57
1.21
0.54
0.90
0.99
0.66
1.04
0.44
0.00
1.46
1.33
0.21
0.50
0.00
0.35
0.63
0.93
1.05
0.41
0.43
1.11
0.57
1.76
0.49
0.74
0.25
0.32
0.62
0.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Contractor
6.45
5.64
6.41
3.74
4.25
1.32
4.62
5.14
3.56
3.80
3.33
4.74
1.48
4.33
4.14
3.07
2.24
2.14
1.38
6.24
2.20
1.65
1.70
2.45
0.82
0.86
1.61
2.74
0.95
1.05
0.78
1.41
0.37
0.61
1.50
3.11
0.70
0.85
1.70
1.72
0.71
1.36
1.06
2.92
1.84
0.52
0.91
2.01
0.25
3.57
0.00
5.43
Company codes are allocated according to company & contractor LTIF performance
Table B.56: FAR, TRIR and LTIF results by company (2014)
LTIF Total
1.97
1.48
1.15
1.14
1.08
1.07
0.96
0.93
0.87
0.79
0.79
0.73
0.73
0.65
0.63
0.60
0.59
0.58
0.53
0.50
0.49
0.39
0.37
0.36
0.34
0.33
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.29
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.22
0.22
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.14
0.14
0.11
0.10
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
LTIF
Company
1.32
1.32
0.00
0.76
0.48
0.39
0.00
0.79
0.50
0.77
0.51
0.58
0.46
0.00
0.20
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.51
0.61
0.11
0.37
0.26
0.00
0.11
0.30
0.16
0.00
0.16
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.18
0.06
0.19
0.57
0.15
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Contractor
2.51
1.58
2.14
1.28
1.18
1.12
1.23
0.95
0.94
0.79
0.87
0.80
0.80
0.87
0.75
0.57
0.71
0.70
0.46
0.48
0.46
0.47
0.37
0.39
0.45
0.42
0.32
0.36
0.39
0.30
0.28
0.29
0.30
0.37
0.23
0.29
0.49
0.19
0.20
0.21
0.17
0.00
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.09
0.03
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
TRIR Exploration
Code
I
130
TRIR Drilling
Total
13.22
Code
H
TRIR Production
Total
10.20
Code
C
TRIR Constructed
Total
8.85
Code
A
Total
16.61
V
4.41
D
7.25
T
8.66
O
5.68
RR
4.35
ZZ
6.97
A
7.07
G
5.34
C
3.50
KK
6.41
L
6.12
R
4.45
A
3.47
A
6.33
E
4.37
JJ
4.27
U
3.16
K
5.56
P
3.81
K
4.07
X
2.76
G
5.19
D
3.50
P
3.95
Q
2.49
T
4.93
X
3.46
H
3.90
XX
2.46
O
4.88
O
3.45
C
2.49
E
2.38
N
4.40
VV
3.23
M
2.31
K
2.02
E
4.33
H
3.10
V
1.91
AA
1.89
I
4.21
G
2.99
D
1.90
DD
1.87
XX
4.21
I
2.78
L
1.73
KK
1.83
U
4.05
K
2.63
II
1.63
NN
1.73
J
3.90
JJ
2.35
RR
1.44
II
1.68
P
3.75
NN
2.20
PP
1.40
Overall
1.48
NN
3.47
RR
2.19
AA
1.35
R
1.41
C
3.29
Q
2.09
QQ
1.27
S
1.34
RR
3.27
J
1.82
Y
1.10
P
1.28
II
3.17
AA
1.79
Overall
1.08
BB
1.25
F
3.00
Overall
1.75
SS
1.00
O
1.00
L
2.91
F
1.42
UU
1.00
CC
0.77
CC
2.84
PP
1.41
LL
0.93
Y
0.57
R
2.82
SS
1.39
U
0.86
D
0.43
Overall
2.78
V
1.18
Z
0.80
F
0.36
V
2.34
DD
1.14
NN
0.76
EE
0.35
S
2.22
FF
1.12
GG
0.63
QQ
0.19
Q
2.17
S
1.06
S
0.60
G
0.00
VV
2.17
II
1.03
DD
0.59
H
0.00
FF
2.14
EE
0.99
CC
0.56
HH
0.00
JJ
2.10
OO
0.90
FF
0.56
JJ
0.00
DD
2.08
R
0.83
EE
0.40
L
0.00
SS
2.05
TT
0.81
HH
0.33
LL
0.00
X
1.97
QQ
0.75
KK
0.22
PP
0.00
TT
1.86
U
0.70
WW
0.19
T
0.00
AA
1.74
CC
0.63
TT
0.07
TT
0.00
QQ
1.71
HH
0.58
F
0.00
Z
0.00
M
1.47
Y
0.58
T
0.00
HH
1.40
LL
0.53
VV
0.00
EE
1.15
UU
0.50
X
0.00
Z
1.15
M
0.45
LL
1.14
Z
0.39
Y
0.73
KK
0.32
PP
0.63
WW
0.20
UU
0.00
GG
0.00
YY
0.00
ZZ
0.00
Company results are sorted from worst to best for each function
Table B.57: Company TRIR results by function (2014)
Appendix B
131
Hours (thousands)
Year
Overall
Company
Contractor
1985
655 650
410 409
245 241
1986
544 053
305 637
238 416
1987
602 480
355 578
246 902
1988
616 448
363 530
252 918
1989
655 945
330 970
324 975
1990
720 652
331 986
388 666
1991
940 538
441 141
499 397
1992
944 143
431 139
513 004
1993
919 176
410 474
508 702
1994
871 973
397 258
474 715
1995
840 811
355 695
485 186
1996
911 540
360 149
551 391
1997
1 161 335
389 442
771 893
1998
1 131 229
385 619
745 610
1999
1 197 460
395 141
802 319
2000
1 633 855
571 915
1 061 940
2001
1 976 646
633 039
1 343 607
2002
2 120 829
636 414
1 484 415
2003
2 247 026
663 894
1 583 132
2004
2 290 453
638 739
1 651 714
2005
2 380 670
639 292
1 741 378
2006
2 936 974
734 425
2 202 549
2007
2 912 801
667 986
2 244 815
2008
3 304 168
712 482
2 591 686
2009
3 585 842
822 240
2 763 602
2010
3 411 144
725 673
2 685 471
2011
3 456 078
753 100
2 702 978
2012
3 691 040
759 600
2 931 440
2013
3 770 546
820 856
2 949 690
2014
4 365 959
945 572
3 420 387
Table B.58: Total work hours reported (1985–2014)
Region
Africa
Asia/Australasia
Hours (thousands)
2014
2013
580 464
595 637
1 077 835
919 063
Europe
385 335
398 820
FSU
248 328
240 596
Middle East
607 954
637 244
North America
South & Central America
Overall
1 025 254
590 089
440 789
389 097
4 365 959
3 770 546
Table B.59: Exposure hours by region (2013 & 2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Region
Exploration
Drilling
132
Hours (thousands)
2014
2013
117 859
95 197
706 179
579 757
Production
1 628 568
1 313 488
Construction
1 001 301
930 481
912 052
851 623
4 365 959
3 770 546
Unspecified
Overall
Table B.60: Exposure hours by function (2013 & 2014)
Appendix B
133
Appendix C – Contributing companies
Table C.1 shows the size of the database in thousands of work hours reported for each contributing
company and whether reported data include information on contractor statistics, breakdown by
function, medical treatment cases, restricted work day cases, days lost following lost work day and
restricted work day cases. All company submissions include data on numbers of fatalities and lost
work day cases.
Hours
(thousands)
Contractor
data
Data by
function
RWDCs
LWDC
days
RWDC
days
113 611
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
ANADARKO
88 165
yes
yes
yes
partly
partly
BASHNEFT
58 313
yes
yes
partly
yes
partly
BG GROUP
89 115
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Company
ADNOC
BHP BILLITON
29 734
yes
yes
yes
partly
partly
158 204
yes
yes
yes
no
no
1 545
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
62 856
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
CHEVRON
493 285
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
mostly
CNOOC
139 443
yes
yes
partly
partly
no
CONOCOPHILLIPS
157 056
yes
no
yes
no
no
DOLPHIN ENERGY
BP
CAIRN ENERGY
CAIRN INDIA
10 251
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
DONG E&P
2 606
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
E.ON
1 080
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
ENI
212 827
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
EXXONMOBIL
254 475
yes
yes
yes
no
no
554
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
GDF SUEZ E&P
INTERNATIONAL
7 458
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
GENEL
3 146
yes
yes
no
mostly
no
HESS CORPORATION
37 609
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
HUSKY
44 318
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
INPEX
118 132
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
1 972
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
137 785
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
MAERSK OIL
29 986
yes
yes
yes
no
no
MARATHON OIL
COMPANY
30 362
yes
yes
yes
no
no
MOL
30 541
yes
yes
partly
no
no
OIL SEARCH
14 226
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
GALP
KOSMOS
KUWAIT OIL COMPANY
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
134
Hours
(thousands)
Contractor
data
Data by
function
RWDCs
LWDC
days
RWDC
days
OMV
86 561
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
ORIGIN
25 805
yes
yes
yes
partly
no
PAN AMERICAN ENERGY
26 881
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
384 953
yes
yes
no
yes
no
46 749
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
PETROBRAS
293 730
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
PETRONAS CARIGALI
SDN BHD
101 888
yes
yes
yes
partly
no
PLUSPETROL
32 828
yes
yes
yes
yes
partly
PREMIER OIL
10 931
yes
yes
mostly
no
no
PTTEP
40 155
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
QATAR PETROLEUM
93 886
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
RASGAS
115 344
yes
yes
yes
no
no
REPSOL
29 129
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
RWE DEA AG
5 066
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
SASOL
4 194
yes
yes
no
yes
no
SHELL COMPANIES
334 770
yes
yes
partly
partly
partly
STATOIL
100 693
yes
yes
yes
no
no
SUNCOR
3 118
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
28 143
yes
yes
yes
no
no
220 936
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
22 433
yes
yes
mostly
mostly
mostly
Company
PEMEX
PERENCO
TALISMAN ENERGY
TOTAL
TULLOW OIL
WINTERSHALL
8 061
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
WOODSIDE
13 681
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
YEMEN LNG
7 369
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
A data row is a single entry for a company for one country and location (one of company onshore, company offshore, contractor onshore,
contractor offshore), e.g. A company, UK, company offshore.
yes = reported for all data rows
mostly = reported for more than 50% of data rows
partly = reported for less than 50% of data rows
no = not reported at all.
Table C.1: Data provided by contributing companies (2014)
Appendix B
135
Appendix D – Countries represented
The tabulation shows the breakdown of reported hours worked in regions and
countries. Also shown is the number of companies reporting data in each country.
The table does not necessarily show all hours worked in the exploration and
production sectors of the oil and gas industry in each country.
Country
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Algeria
11
24 138
Angola
9
102 166
Benin
1
401
Cameroun
1
7 417
Chad
1
13 758
Congo
4
42 309
D.R. of the Congo (formerly Zaire)
2
5 571
Egypt
7
55 270
Equatorial Guinea
4
9 291
Ethiopia
1
1 195
Gabon
5
31 030
Ghana
6
6 563
Guinea
1
12
Ivory Coast
3
718
Kenya
5
11 080
Liberia
3
406
13
15 490
Libya
Madagascar
3
113
Mauritania
5
3 671
Morocco
5
1 766
Mozambique
5
13 127
Namibia
3
322
Nigeria
8
206 912
Senegal
3
981
Sierra Leone
2
5
South Africa
5
822
Sudan
1
63
Tanzania
4
4 448
Togo
1
31
Tunisia
7
13 045
Uganda
3
8 343
Table D.1: Number of companies and work hours reported by country
– Africa (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
136
Country
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Australia
19
270 471
Bangladesh
1
17 598
Brunei
3
1 336
Cambodia
China
India
Indonesia
Japan
1
12
13
120 814
4
67 169
16
257 968
4
5 005
Malaysia
10
132 867
Myanmar
5
17 939
New Zealand
4
2 401
Pakistan
6
31 634
Papua New Guinea
5
36 313
Philippines
2
9 155
Singapore
7
22 384
South Korea
5
18 139
Taiwan
1
9
Thailand
7
60 355
Timor Leste
1
5
Vietnam
7
6 261
Table D.2: Number of companies and work hours reported by country – Asia/Australasia (2014)
Country
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Austria
1
2 911
Bulgaria
2
23
Croatia
2
10 129
Cyprus
2
531
Denmark
6
12 884
Faroe Islands
1
208
France
6
12 106
Germany
5
10 494
Greenland
2
25
Hungary
2
8 024
Ireland
2
2 410
Italy
5
20 007
Malta
2
189
Monaco
1
177
Netherlands
8
21 963
Norway
22
106 077
Poland
3
840
Portugal
1
9
Romania
4
55 488
Spain
3
3 769
Sweden
1
5
26
117 066
UK
Table D.3: Number of companies and work hours reported by country – Europe (2014)
Appendix B
Country
137
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Azerbaijan
5
37 230
Kazakhstan
10
119 052
1
8
13
80 772
Turkmenistan
4
10 762
Ukraine
4
504
Lithuania
Russia
Table D.4: Number of companies and work hours reported by country – FSU (2014)
Country
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Iran
2
100
Iraq
15
44 103
Jordan
1
763
Kurdistan region of Iraq
1
111
Kuwait
4
159 029
Oman
3
6 546
Palestine
1
8
11
246 677
Saudi Arabia
1
83
Syria
2
32
Turkey
3
3 394
12
121 115
5
25 993
Qatar
UAE
Yemen
Table D.5: Number of companies and work hours reported by country – Middle East (2014)
Country
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Canada
14
167 158
Mexico
5
385 112
19
472 984
USA
Table D.6: Number of companies and work hours reported by country – North America (2014)
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Country
138
No. of companies
Hours (thousands)
Argentina
8
43 428
Aruba
1
82
Bolivia
4
15 600
Brazil
14
310 542
Chile
1
72
Colombia
10
8 992
Ecuador
2
5 622
Falkland Islands
1
281
French Guiana
1
18
Guatemala
1
2 700
Guyana
2
24
Honduras
1
33
Peru
5
34 895
Surinam
3
31
Trinidad & Tobago
6
13 583
Uruguay
3
176
Venezuela
7
4 710
Table D.7: Number of companies and work hours reported by country –
South & Central America (2014)
Glossary
139
Appendix E – Glossary of terms
A
Assault and violent act (as an incident/event
category)
Intentional attempt, threat or act of bodily injury by a
person or person(s) or by violent harmful actions of
unknown intent, includes intentional acts of damage
to property.
C
Caught in, under or between (as an incident/
event category)
Injury where injured person is crushed or similarly
injured between machinery moving parts or other
objects, caught between rolling tubulars or objects
being moved, crushed between a ship and a dock,
or similar incidents. Also includes vehicle incidents
involving a rollover.
Causal factors
See IOGP Report 2014su, Safety data reporting users'
guide – 2014 data.
Company employee
Any person employed by and on the payroll of
the reporting company, including corporate and
management personnel specifically involved in E&P.
Persons employed under short-service contracts are
included as company employees provided they are
paid directly by the company.
Confined space (as an incident/event category)
Spaces that are considered confined because their
configurations hinder the activities of employee who
must enter, work in, and exit them. Confined spaces
include, but are not limited to underground vaults,
tanks, storage bins, manholes, pits, silos, process
vessels and pipelines.
Construction (as a work function)
Major construction, fabrication activities and also
disassembly, removal and disposal (decommissioning)
at the end of the facility life. Includes construction
of process plant, yard construction of structures,
offshore installation, hook-up and commissioning, and
removal of redundant process facilities.
Construction, commissioning,
decommissioning (as a type of activity)
Activities involving the construction, fabrication and
installation of equipment, facilities or plant, testing
activities to verify design objectives or specification,
and also disassembly, removal and disposal
(decommissioning) at the end of the facility life.
Contractor
A contractor is defined as an individual or organization
performing work for the reporting company, following
verbal or written agreement. Subcontractor is
synonymous with contractor.
Contractor employee
Any person employed by a contractor or contractor’s
subcontractor(s) who is directly involved in execution
of prescribed work under a contract with the reporting
company.
Cut, puncture, scrape (as an incident/event
category)
Abrasions, scratches and wounds that penetrate the skin.
D
Diving operations
The personnel, equipment and management systems
to support a person who dives. A person dives if they
enter water or any other liquid, or a chamber in which
they are subject to pressure greater than 100 millibars
above atmospheric pressure, and in order to survive
in such an environment breathes air or other gas at a
pressure greater than atmospheric pressure. Or for
such a purpose uses a vehicle, capsule or suit where
a sealed internal atmospheric pressure is maintained
and where the external pressure differential is greater
than 100 millibars.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Diving, subsea, ROV (as a type of activity)
Operations involving diving (see definition for diving
operations), subsea equipment or activities and/or
operations involving underwater remotely operated
vehicles (ROV).
Drilling (as a work function)
140
Exposure: Noise, chemical, biological,
vibration (as an incident/event category)
Exposure to noise, chemical substances (including
asphyxiation due to lack of oxygen not associated
with a confined space), hazardous biological material,
vibration or radiation.
All exploration, appraisal and production drilling and
workover as well as their administrative, engineering,
construction, materials supply and transportation
aspects. It includes site preparation, rigging up
and down and restoration of the drilling site upon
work completion. Drilling includes ALL exploration,
appraisal and production drilling.
F
Drilling/workover/well services (as a type
of activity)
The number of company/contractor fatalities per
100 000 000 (100 million) hours worked.
Activities involving the development, maintenance work
or remedial treatments related to an oil or gas well.
Fatality
E
Cases that involve one or more people who died as
a result of a work-related incident or occupational
illness.
Event
An unplanned or uncontrolled outcome of a business
operation or activity that has or could have contributed
to an injury, illness, physical or environmental damage.
Exploration (as a work function)
Geophysical, seismographic and geological
operations, including their administrative and
engineering aspects, construction, maintenance,
materials supply, and transportation of personnel and
equipment; excludes drilling.
Explosion or burn (as an incident/
event category)
Burns or other effects of fires, explosions and
extremes of temperature. Explosion means a rapid
combustion, not an overpressure.
Exposure: Electrical (as an incident/
event category)
Exposure to electrical shock or electrical burns etc.
Falls from height (as an incident/
event category)
A person falls from one level to another.
Fatal accident rate (FAR)
First aid case
Cases that are not sufficiently serious to be reported
as medical treatment or more serious cases but
nevertheless require minor first aid treatment, e.g.
dressing on a minor cut, removal of a splinter from a
finger. First aid cases are not recordable incidents.
H
High potential event
Any incident or near miss that could have realistically
resulted in one or more fatalities.
Hours worked
The actual hours worked, including overtime hours,
are recorded in the case of onshore operations. The
hours worked by an individual will generally be about
2 000 per year. For offshore workers, the hours worked
are calculated on a 12-hour work day. Consequently,
average hours worked per year will vary from 1 600
to 2 300 hours per person depending upon the on/off
shift ratio. Vacations and leave are excluded.
Glossary
141
Hours worked in year (thousands)
M
Hours are rounded to the nearest thousand.
Maintenance, inspection and testing (as a type
of activity)
I
Activities related to preserving, repairing, examining and
function testing assets, equipment, plant or facilities.
Incident
An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of events
that has resulted in at least one fatality, recordable
injury or illness, or physical or environmental damage.
K
Medical cause of death
This is the cause of death given on the death
certificate. Where two types of causes are provided,
such as pulmonary oedema caused by inhalation of hot
gases from a fire, both are recorded.
Key performance indicators (KPI)
Medical treatment case (MTC)
In this report, these include: number of fatalities, fatal
accident and incident rates, lost time injury frequency
and total recordable injury rate.
Cases that are not severe enough to be reported as
fatalities or lost work day cases or restricted work day
cases but are more severe than requiring simple first
aid treatment.
L
Lifting, crane, rigging, deck operations (as a
type of activity)
N
Near miss
Activities related to the use of mechanical lifting and
hoisting equipment, assembling and dis-assembling
drilling rig equipment and drill pipe handling on the
rig floor.
An unplanned or uncontrolled event or chain of
events that has not resulted in recordable injury,
illness, physical or environmental damage but had the
potential to do so in other circumstances.
Lost time injury (LTI)
Number of days unfit for work
A fatality or lost work day case. The number of LTIs is
the sum of fatalities and lost work day cases.
The sum total of calendar days (consecutive or
otherwise) after the days of the occupational injuries
on which the employees involved were unfit for work
and did not work.
Lost time injury frequency (LTIF)
The number of lost time injuries (fatalities + lost work
day cases) incidents per 1 000 000 hours worked.
Lost work day case (LWDC)
Any work related injury other than a fatal injury which
results in a person being unfit for work on any day
after the day of occurrence of the occupational injury.
Any day includes rest days, weekend days, leave days,
public holidays or days after ceasing employment.
LWDC severity
The average number of lost days per lost work day case.
Number of employees
Average number of full-time and part-time employees
involved in exploration and production, calculated on a
full-time basis, during the reporting year.
Number of fatalities
The total number of a company’s employees and or
contractor’s employees who died as a result of an
incident. Delayed deaths that occur after the incident
are included if the deaths were a direct result of
the incident. For example, if a fire killed one person
outright, and a second died three weeks later from
lung damage caused by the fire, both are reported.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
142
O
P
Occupational injury
Pressure release (as an incident/
event category)
Any injury such as a cut, fracture, sprain, amputation,
or any fatality, which results from a work-related
activity or from an exposure involving a single incident
in the work environment, such as deafness from
explosion, one-time chemical exposure, back disorder
from a slip/trip, insect or snake bite.
Office, warehouse, accommodation, catering
(as a type of activity)
Activities related to work conducted in offices,
warehouses, workshops, accommodation and catering
facilities.
Offshore work
All activities and operations that take place at sea,
including activities in bays, in major inland seas
such as the Caspian Sea, or in other inland seas
directly connected to oceans. Incidents including
transportation of people and equipment from shore
to the offshore location, either by vessel or helicopter,
should be recorded as offshore.
Onshore work
All activities and operations that take place within
a landmass, including those on swamps, rivers and
lakes. Land-to-land aircraft operations are counted as
onshore, even though flights are over water.
Other (as an incident/event category)
Used to specify where an incident cannot be logically
classed under any other category. In the case of
incident activities, includes air transport incidents
Note: the work function ‘other’ was replaced by
‘construction’ for the first time in 2006.
Overexertion or strain (as an incident/
event category)
Physical overexertion e.g. muscle strain.
Failure of or release of gas, liquid or object from a
pressurized system.
Process safety event
A process safety event, which can also be referred
to as an asset integrity event, is a loss of primary
containment (LOPC) and is recordable if:
i. the consequence was a reportable employee
or contractor injury or fatality, a third party
hospital admission or fatality, a community or site
evacuation or a fire/explosion; or
ii. a pressure relief device discharge or material
release occurs which exceeded defined thresholds
(even if none of the consequences above occurred)
as specified within IOGP Report 456, Process safety –
recommended practice on key performance indicators
which provides consequence and threshold definitions
consistent with API Recommended Practice No.754
http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456.pdf. The supplement
to IOGP Report 456 provides process safety upstream
PSE examples http://www.iogp.org/pubs/456supp.pdf.
Process safety related
Process safety related events are those which do not
meet the specific criteria to be classified as Tier 1
or 2 process safety events but which have learning
potential in the prevention of process safety events.
Production (as a work function)
Petroleum and natural gas producing operations,
including their administrative and engineering
aspects, minor construction, repairs, maintenance
and servicing, materials supply, and transportation of
personnel and equipment. It covers all mainstream
production operations including wireline. Gas
processing activities with the primary intent of
producing gas liquids for sale including:
• work on production wells under pressure
• oil (including condensates) and gas extraction and
separation (primary production)
• heavy oil production where it is inseparable from
upstream (i.e. stream assisted gravity drainage)
production
• primary oil processing (water separation, stabilization)
Glossary
143
• primary gas processing (dehydration, liquids
separation, sweetening, CO2 removal)
• floating storage units (FSUs) and sub-sea
storage units
• gas processing activities with the primary intent of
producing gas liquids for sale
• secondary liquid separation (i.e. natural gas
liquids [NGL] extraction using refrigeration
processing)
• liquefied natural gas (LNG) and gas to liquids
(GTL) operations
• flow-lines between wells and pipelines between
facilities associated with field production
operations
• oil and gas loading facilities including land or
marine vessels (trucks and ships) when connected
to an oil or gas production process
• pipeline operations (including booster stations)
operated by company E&P business.
Work performed might be:
Production excludes:
Slips and trips (at the same height) (as an
incident/event category)
• production drilling or workover
• mining processes associated with the extraction of
heavy oil tar sands
• heavy oil when separable from upstream operations
• secondary heavy oil processing (upgrader)
• refineries.
Production operations (as a type of activity)
Activities related to the extraction of hydrocarbons
from source such as an oil or gas well or hydrocarbon
bearing geological structure, including primary
processing, storage and transport operations.
Includes normal, start-up or shut-down operations.
R
• an assignment to a temporary job
• part-time work at the regular job
• working full-time in the regular job but not
performing all the usual duties of the job.
Where no meaningful restricted work is being
performed, the incident is recorded as a lost work day
case (LWDC).
S
Seismic/survey operations (as a type of activity)
Activities relating to the determination of sub-surface
structures for the purpose of locating oil and gas
deposits including geophysical and seismic data
acquisition.
Slips, trips and falls caused by falling over or onto
something at the same height.
Struck by (as an incident/event category)
Incidents/events where injury results from being hit by
moving equipment and machinery, or by flying or falling
objects. Also includes vehicle incidents where the
vehicle is struck by or struck against another object.
T
Third party
A person with no business relationship with the
company or contractor.
Recordable
Total recordable injury rate (TRIR)
A type of event, incident, injury, illness, release or
other outcome which has been determined to meet or
exceed definitions, criteria or thresholds for inclusion
and classification in reported data.
The number of recordable injuries (fatalities + lost
work day cases + restricted work day cases + medical
treatment cases) per million hours worked.
Restricted work day case (RWDC)
Any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost
work day case which results in a person being unfit
for full performance of the regular job on any day after
the occupational injury.
Transport – Air (as a type of activity)
Involving aircraft, either fixed wing or helicopters.
Injuries caused by accidents on the ground at airports
are classified in one of the other categories.
Safety performance indicators – 2014 data
Transport – Land (as a type of activity)
Involving motorized vehicles designed for transporting
people and goods over land, e.g. cars, buses, trucks.
Pedestrians struck by a vehicle are classified as land
transport incidents. Incidents from a mobile crane
would only be land transport incidents if the crane
were being moved between locations.
Transport – Water, including marine activity
(as a type of activity)
Involving vessels, equipment or boats designed for
transporting people and goods over water (including
inland, marine, ice roads and marsh/swamp) e.g.
supply vessels, crew boats.
U
Unspecified – Other (as a type of activity)
Incidents that cannot be logically classed under other
headings or where the activity is unknown.
Unspecified (as a work function)
Unspecified is used for the entry of data associated
with office personnel whose work hours and
incident data cannot be reasonably assigned to
the administrative support of one of the function
groupings of exploration, drilling, production or
construction. Corporate overhead support function
personnel such as finance or human resources
staff may be examples where work hours cannot
be specifically assigned to a particular function. All
other data that are not sepa­rated out by function are
reported as unspecified.
W
Water related/drowning (as an incident/
event category)
Incidents/events in which water played a significant
role including drowning.
Work-related injury
See occupational injury.
144
Registered Office
Level 5
209–215 Blackfriars Rd
London SE1 8NL
United Kingdom
Brussels Office
Bd du Souverain,165
4th Floor
B-1160 Brussels
Belgium
T +44 (0)20 3763 9700
F +44 (0)20 3763 9701
reception@iogp.org
T +32 (0)2 566 9150
F +32 (0)2 566 9159
The IOGP safety performance indicators –
2014 data report summarizes the safety
performance of contributing IOGP member
companies for 2014 based on the analysis
of 4366 million work hours of data.
Submissions were made by 52 of the 58
operating company IOGP Members and
cover operations in 111 countries.
The key performance indicators (KPI) used
to benchmark safety performance are:
• number of fatalities
• fatal accident and incident rates
• total recordable injury rate, and
• lost time injury frequency.
Against the background of a 16% increase
in work hours reported, the number of
fatalities has decreased from 80 in 2013 to
45 in 2014. The resulting fatal accident rate
(FAR) of 1.03 is 51% lower than last year.
www.iogp.org