Analysis of Pile Scour and Associated Hydrodynamic Forces using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Niels G. Jacobsen (Deltares), Greta van Velzen (Deltares) and Jørgen Fredsøe (TU Denmark) 7th Dutch OpenFOAM Users Group 17 december 2014 Outline • Short on other Deltares and OpenFoam • Motivation and model description • Test case • Results – flat bed (onset of scour) • Results – scoured bed • Conclusion 17 december 2014 Deltares and OpenFoam Wave and Structures • Interaction with porous structure • Slamming forces on structures • Knowledge about waves2Foam Sediment Transport and Scour/Morphology • Sediment transport and resulting bed level change • Moving meshes (either 3 or 4 connected meshes) • Finite area mesh 17 december 2014 Motivation and Model Description Motivation • Modelling scour at large scales could increase knowledge on scale effects • The modelling is, however, still very time consuming (Dixen et al., 2013) • How can the modelling approach be accelerated? • Is it valid to decouple hydrodynamics and scour development? • I.e. average out the vortex shedding in the hydrodynamics (e.g. Roulund et al., 2005 and Dixen et al., 2013). • Can be addressed by answering: What are the transient effects? • Presentation based on paper accepted at ICSE-7 in Perth 2014. 17 december 2014 Numerical Model (Overview) • Transient solution to the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations • π − π turbulence closure with wall function (Jacobsen et al., 2012) • Sediment transport is modelled with bed load and suspended load (Jacobsen et al., 2014) • Bedload and reference concentration concept. Both following Engelund and Fredsøe (1976) • No response of the bed (immobile bed) • Using OpenFoam® v. 1.6-ext. 17 december 2014 POD Analysis – I • With POD analysis main coherent features (modes) can be extracted (in excess of the average) • Define the fluctuating field of some properties (ππ , Δβπ /Δπ‘, Δβπ /Δπ‘): π′ = π − π • Construct the square matrix π¨π×π π¨π×π = πΌπ πΌ = π1′ π′2 … π′π π π1′ π′2 … π′π • π¨π×π has π eigenvalues (ππ ) and eigenvectors (ππ,π×1 ) and the modes are a linear combination of the fluctuating fields: ππ πΌπ ππ = ππ πΌπ 17 december 2014 2 POD Analysis – II • Example of POD-mode • When does a mode matter? Determined by its weights, which is a projection: ππ (π‘) = ππ π′(π‘) and the relative importance: π1 π1 Relative importance = ππ π π2 π2 17 december 2014 ππ Test Case Flow and Sediment Properties • Inlet: Equilibrium conditions with V = 29.1 cm/s (also turbulence) • Sediment is 0.18 mm and surface roughness is 0.45 mm • Far-field Shields number is 0.045, i.e. studying clear-water scour • A total of 554,000 computational cells 17 december 2014 Shape of the Sediment Bed • Three scour depths are investigated: • π π· = 0.0 (flat bed) • π π· = 0.5 (intermediate scour) • π π· = 1.0 (developed scour) • The bed is kept immobile • Simulation of 250 s (or equal to ~150 shed vortices) 17 december 2014 Results – Flat Bed Vortex Shedding and Erosion/Deposition • Effect of incoming shear flow in vortex shedding • Drag coefficients in expected range • Example of transient erosion/deposion pattern (in m/s) 17 december 2014 Average Bed Properties ππ /π Δβπ /Δπ‘ Δhs /Δπ‘ Mean Std • Stagnation in ππ /π around π¦ = 0 • Std. of Δβπ and Δβπ only considerable for 0 < π₯ • Also, the skewness of Δβπ and Δβπ is small, i.e. averaging can be allowed (on a flat bed) 17 december 2014 POD Modes – Bed Shear Stress • Symmetric in magnitude • Asymmetric in direction • The modes describe 75% of the agitating force (in excess of the average) 17 december 2014 POD Modes – Erosion/Deposition Δβπ Δπ‘ Δβπ Δπ‘ • Modes are either symmetric or asymmetric. • Erosion/deposition (in excess of average) most prominent in the wake. Δβπ Δπ‘ Δβπ Δπ‘ Δβπ Δπ‘ Δβπ Δπ‘ 17 december 2014 • Asymmetric modes have some upstream response. • Can this be linked to modes in bed shear stresses? POD Modes – Matching the Frequency • • • • FFT on POD-weights Only near-bed frequencies observed Modes are linked using a correlation analysis on weights For larger π, the far-field frequencies can be important 17 december 2014 Results – Scoured Bed Mean Velocity Fields - Horizontal • Effect from scour hole on mean flow • Mean horizontal velocity normalised by π. • Horseshoe vortex becomes a separation bubble • Lee-side flow is somewhat confused 17 december 2014 Mean Velocity Field - Vertical • Effect from scour hole on mean vertical flow • Mean vertical velocity normalised by π • Down-flow increases with π/π· • Lee-side upwelling increases with π/π· • Important for advection of suspended sediment out of the scour hole 17 december 2014 Summary of Findings of Scoured Bed • The skewness of Δβπ /Δπ‘ and Δβπ /Δπ‘ stays small at π π· = 0.5 • For π π· = 1 the skewness becomes important relative to mean change, i.e. average formulation will carry a larger error • The near-bed shedding frequencies still dominate the near-bed processes • The upstream separation on the scour edge could explain the variation in the location of maximum scour: • ±45o at the initial scour development • Almost constant depth from -45o to +45o at later stages 17 december 2014 Conclusion Conclusion • Under clear water scour conditions only the lower part of the shedding affects near-bed processes • The patterns in erosion/deposition is linked to the vortex shedding • Up to π π· = 0.5 sediment transport can be calculated based on average quantities (the skewness is small) • This is not the case for π π· = 1.0, but mainly in the wake • For scour predictions in uni-directional flow, average quantities could therefore be used 17 december 2014 References Dixen, M., Sumer, B.M. and Fredsøe, J. (2013). Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and scour around a half-buried sphere. Coastal Engineering, 73, 84-105. Engelund, F. and Fredsøe, J. (1976). Sediment Transport Model for Straight Alluvial Channels. Nordic Hydrology, 7(5), 293-306. Jacobsen, N.G., Fuhrman, D.R., and Fredsøe, J. (2012). A Wave Generation Toolbox for the OpenSource CFD Library: OpenFoam®. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 70(9), 1073-1088. Jacobsen, N.G., Fredsøe, J. and Jensen, J.H. (2014). Formation and development of a breaker bar under regular waves. Part 1: Model description and hydrodynamics. Coastal Engineering, 88, 182-193. Jacobsen, N.G., van Velzen, G. and Fredsøe, J. (2014). Analysis of Pile Scour and Associated Hydroynamic Forces using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition. Proceedings for International Conference on Scour and Erosion, 12 pages. Roulund, R., Sumer, B.M., Fredsøe, J. and Michelsen, J. (2005). Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and scour around a circular pile. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 534, 351-401. 17 december 2014