Lecture 19 Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJT): Part 3 Ebers Moll

advertisement
Lecture 19
Bipolar Junction Transistors (BJT): Part 3
Ebers Moll Large Signal BJT Model, Using CVD
model to solve for DC bias point
Reading:
Pierret 11.1
Georgia Tech
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) Quantitative Solution
Insight into transistor performance
If LB>>W (most of the minority carriers make it across the base),
α DC
β DC
1
⇒
=
=
2
DEWN B
1 + β DC
DEWN B 1  W 
1+
1+
+  
DB LE N E
DB LE N E 2  LB 
1
and
β DC
α DC
DB LE N E
⇒
=
=
2
DEWN B 1 − α DC
DEWN B 1  W 
+  
D B LE N E 2  LB 
Georgia Tech
1
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
IF0
A




coshW   VEB
D

 VCB
L
D
p
D
p


1
B


V
 e T − 1 − qA B Bo
 e VT − 1
I E = qA E n Eo + B Bo


LB sinh W  
 LE
 LB sinh W  


 L 
 L 


B 
B  




*



W  
cosh
 L   VCB

D p

VEB
D
D
p


1
B 

V
 e T − 1 − qA C nCo + B Bo
 e VT − 1
I C = qA B Bo


LB sinh W  
 LB sinh W  
 LC


 L 
 L 


B 
B  




A
IR0
 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I E = I F 0  e
− 1 − A e
− 1




 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I C = A e
− 1 − I R 0  e
− 1




Georgia Tech
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I E = I F 0  e
− 1 − A e
− 1




 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I C = A e
− 1 − I R 0  e
− 1




When VCB=0,
IC
IB
 VEB VT

I E = I F 0  e
− 1 and


but ,
IF0 > A
VEB
IE
 VEB VT

I C = A e
− 1


Looks like an Ideal diode
( see *)
Thus,
 VEB VT

 VEB VT




IE = IF0 e
− 1 and I C = α F I F 0  e
− 1




but , I C = α F I E → α F = α DC common base current gain
The collector current is the fraction of the emitter current “collected”
Georgia Tech
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I E = I F 0  e
− 1 − A e
− 1




 VCB VT

 VEB VT

I C = A e
− 1 − I R 0  e
− 1




When VEB=0,
VCB
IC
IB
 VCB VT 
I E = − A e
− 1 and


but ,
I R0 > A
IE
 VCB VT 
I C = − I R 0  e
− 1


Looks like an Ideal diode
( see *)
Thus,
 VCB VT 
 VCB VT 
I E = −α R I R 0  e
− 1 and I C = − I R 0  e
− 1




but , I E = α R I C → α R ≠ α DC
In Inverse Active mode, the emitter current is the fraction of the
collector current “collected”
Georgia Tech
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
Ideal Diodes
PNP
Note: A=αRIRo= αFIFo
IF
 VEB VT 
I F = I F 0  e
− 1 and


IR
Emitter
 VCB VT 
I R = I R 0  e
− 1


Collector
IE
IC
αRIR
Base
IB
αFIF
 VCB VT

 VEB VT




IE = IF0e
− 1 − α R I R 0  e
− 1




Georgia Tech
 VCB VT

 VEB VT




IC = α F I F 0  e
− 1 − I R 0  e
− 1




ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
Ideal Diodes
NPN
IF
 VBE VT 
I F = I F 0  e
− 1 and


IR
Emitter
 VBC VT 
I R = I R 0  e
− 1


Collector
IE
IC
αRIR
Base
IB
αFIF
 VBC VT 
 VBB VT 
I E = I F 0  e
− 1 − α R I R 0  e
− 1




Georgia Tech
 VBC VT 
 VBE VT 
I C = α F I F 0  e
− 1 − I R 0  e
− 1




ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Using the Ebers-Moll model requires mathematical complexity
(and much pain). Thus, we have an approximate solution
method* that allows a quick solution.
*I refer to as the “CVD/Beta Analysis”. This is just my term, not a
universal name.
Georgia Tech
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Quick Solution using a CVD/Beta Approach
Consider the following pnp BJT circuit with a common emitter
current gain, βDC=180.7. Find Ib, Ic, and Ie assuming a turn on
voltage of 0.7V.
Neglect Leakage
currents
R1(Ib)
I C = α dc I E + I CBo
I C = β dc I B + I CEo
I E = I B + IC
Ic
Ib
Ie
R3(Ie)
0=-4V+IB(12000)+VEB+IE(15000)
4V=IB(12000)+0.7V+IC(1/αDC)(15000)
4V=IB(12000)+0.7V+[βDCIB][(1+βDC)/ βDC](15000)
3.3V=IB[(12000)+(1+180.7)(15000)]
IB= 1.2uA
Georgia Tech
IC=180.7IB=218uA
IE=(181.7/180.7)IC=219uA
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
Compare our results using the CVD/Beta model to the full
Ebers-Moll solution used in PSPICE...
Actual
Ibase=1.05uA
not 1.2uA as
calculated
Only 1%
error in the
collector and
emitter
currents
Actual
Vbe=0.662V
not 0.7V as
assumed
Current into various nodes
Georgia Tech
Voltage at various nodes
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
Common Base
IV curve looks
like a diode
Input
Real shows
variation due
to “base width
modulation”
dependent on
the applied
VCB
Output
Input Output
IE and IC and
VEB
(-VCB)
Georgia Tech
After the basecollector junction
is reverse biased
(starts collecting),
IE~=IC
Real IV is limited
by breakdown of
the base-collector
junction
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Development of the Large Signal Model of a BJT (Ebers-Moll Model)
Common Emitter
IV curve looks
like a diode but
has a DC shift
associated with
the reverse biased
base-collector
junction current
Output
Real IV is limited by
breakdown of the basecollector junction
Input
Input Output
IB and IC and
VEB
VEC
Georgia Tech
After the base-collector
junction is reverse biased
(starts collecting), IC=βIB
Real shows finite
slope due to
“base width
modulation”
dependent on the
applied VCB
ECE 3040 - Dr. Alan Doolittle
Download