SSA SAILPLANE BUILDER Issue # 10-2013 Sailplane Builder c/o Andy Kecskes 6248 Spruce Lake Avenue San Diego, CA 92119 October 2013 Published Monthly Experimental Soaring Association Purpose Table of Contents The purpose of the Experimental Soaring Association is to stimulate interest in sailplane design and construction by ESA News, Letters, Tidbits & the Like 3 homebuilders. To establish classes, standards, categories, where applicable. To disseminate information relating to Dick Harrington Obit construction techniques, materials, theory and related topics. To give recognition for noteworthy designs and By Dave Hudnut 4 accomplishments. Affiliation Eastern Workshop Wrap Up ESA is a division of the Soaring Society of America (SSA). By Jerry Gross, Ron Odgen, Al McCarty 5 Our affiliation requires a 66% or higher percentage of ESA members to be members of SSA. ESA encourages all its Aerodynamic Study of the Wright Brothers members to join SSA, which provides many services to the By Phil Barnes 6 ESA and its members. Editorial Policy Electronic Memory Jogger Material published in Sailplane Builder is contributed by individuals and members of the Association. Accuracy and By John Kevern 9 validity of opinions expressed is the responsibility of the contributor. Information communicated to the Editor (or any Classified Advertisements 11 officer), whether those communications occur in printed, electronic or other media, is considered publishable in the ESA Officers 12 Editor’s sole discretion, unless the author instructs the Editor in advance that it not be subject to publication (or other Membership Application 12 dissemination among the membership through the newsletter, website or otherwise). Other publications may reproduce ESA Advertising Policy materials published herein provided credit is given as to One classified Ad per issue is free to members source, and approval given by the original author. Material (limit: 50 words). Ad runs 3 months, extended by request. submitted to the Editor will be returned on request (if the material is submitted from someone in the United States, please provide a self-addressed stamped envelope it all Classified ads are available to non-members: possible). All materials are subject to deletions, additions, or -$.20/word/issue (up to 75 words) -$.15/word/issue (for each word after 75 words). revisions necessary to adapt the material to the space, style Other advertising is available, including (per issue prices) and standards of the Sailplane Builder magazine. Although -full page $40 reasonable care is taken, Sailplane Builder magazine can not -1/2 page $20 be responsible for lost or damaged photography, art work or -1/4 page $10 manuscripts. -1/8 page $ 5 Liability Statement A GREAT DEAL! The Association has made every effort to insure the correctness and completeness of material printed in this issue. However, use of any material published herein will be deemed your release of the Association and it personnel from “liability” for any injury, damages or losses claimed to be caused from Official Publication of the Experimental the use thereof. Submissions Soaring Association Manuscripts submitted for consideration should be type written A Division of the Soaring Society of or on disk (IBM format) and may be of any length. Send as a America Word (or text) file, if at all possible. Hand written manuscripts are acceptable if legible. Photos should be captioned and (Formerly the Sailplane Homebuilders credited. Deadline is two weeks before the start of each Association - SHA) calendar quarter (January, April, July, October). Publication Website: http://www.esoaring.com Dedicated to designing, building, testing and flying sailplanes and the science of soaring. www.esoaring.com Issues are published quarterly. Issues are mailed per the subscriber’s membership type. Attempts are made to complete the issue during the second month of its date and send out in the third month, but the schedule is subject to changes (minor delays or early publication, depending on the needs of the organization). If there will delays or early publication, every effort to notify readers by publishing a note on the website will be made. The website is www.esoaring.com. October 2013 Page 2 EDITORIAL: This was looking like it was going to be a short issue since I had a limited amount of information from the workshops and only limited correspondence from the membership. Thanks to Phil Barnes submitting his synopsis on the Wright Brothers I came up with enough for a full newsletter. I have asked several of the western workshop speakers for an article to go along with their slide presentations, but nothing has come in yet so I am not sure what the November issue is going to look like. I find it hard to believe that out of all our members (we are over 200 strong right now) there are not groups that have similar interests and lots of questions that need to be answered by those with experience. Whether it is theory, building from plans or building from scratch, I know there are times when you are stuck on something and need to discuss it with someone. It would sure help me and the association if you shared these things with the group so we can all learn new techniques or better understand how something works. So, please send in your letters and emails with illustrations or pictures so I can get them out to the members and give you the feedback you are probably looking for to complete your project. ------------------------------------------------------------Hi Guys I have recently subscribed to the ESA, having subscribed in the past, my last newsletter being received in 1995. My interest now, as it was then was to build one of Jim Maupin’s designs. The plans for the Windrose and the Carbon Dragon were obtained, but other things got in the way and I built other aeroplanes. Several of them. I now find myself, because of a regulation change in the UK. wanting to build a Woodstock, for which I don’t have the drawings. Smart move ! The drawings and build book were downloaded from http://www.ihpa.ie/carbon-dragon/ There are a few of questions I have; Who, if anyone, would I need to pay a license fee to, to build a Woodstock? www.esoaring.com Is there anywhere I can buy a set of full size drawings for the 13m Woodstock? As I have seen a number of enquiries on various forums for these drawing I would have thought it would be in someone’s interest to start producing them again? Failing this. Is there anyone who has a used set of drawings and are willing to get them copied and sent to me. I will of course pay for them in advance? My last copy of ‘Sailplane Builder’ April 1995 contained Clint Brooks’s ‘Woodstock builder’s Forum. Is there anywhere I can get the full run of those excellent articles? How do I go about getting back copies of electronic Sailplane Builder? Best regards John Webb (ed. - I have forwarded this message to Dan Armstrong who might a better source for your questions on the plans. Right now the electronic copies of back issues are not stored in any type of public forum where you can download them. I have all the ones from 2003 forward since that is when I took over as editor. However, I am trying to put together a complete library of all the issues but it is a large task and taking more time than I anticipated. I don't have anything of substance for the 1995+ period right now so can't be of much help there at this time.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- John, O h how I envy those very few people who own a Carbon Dragon. This is an aircraft that will provide long enjoyable flights on days when other gliders either remain on the ground or are towed up for "sled rides" back to the ground. I remember Gary Osoba describing how he flew in the "ridge lift" from a row of trees next to his field ... how his wife would auto tow him aloft ... first to take off while other are waiting for the thermals to develop ... and be the last to land. If he felt lift at 300 feet he got off tow; otherwise, he stayed on tow to 600 feet. October 2013 Page 3 The website link you posted was created by Phil Lardner, Wales, who took over my website. He is doing a much better job than I ever did. photo files, and I may have a photo or two as well. I'll get to work on a little obit. Steve Adkins will remember Dick as well. I sold my plans to a fellow in Iowa who promised to build ... haven't hear from him in years. I also sold him a few parts and a full spool of 12K Carbon Tows at a really great price! Previously, I actually received "threats" from people who demanded I sell them plans because I wasn't building. Dick had a number of airplane projects he was working on in past years, and (a year or two ago) his wife and son asked my opinion on their value. I in turn asked Steve Arndt if he'd take a look (he lives about 20 miles from Dick's place in New Hampshire), and Steve reported that it was too much of a mess to be worth much. We passed that on to the Harringtons (tactfully). I did see (several years ago) a self-designed airplane in one shop, and in another building the fuselage of a full-scale version of a motorglider he used to discuss at workshops, but it was my opinion at the time that a prudent potential buyer would not want to risk his life in either one, if they were to be finished. There have been a few reports of buying plans through ebay. Also, the various Yahoo forums on building ultralights, gliders, etc. are a source worth watching. Early, in my endeavor to build the Carbon Dragon, I contacted many of the early plans holders to determine the status of their project. One man laughed ... he was a doctor who bought plans merely for the enjoyment of reviewing the plans! ebay - Carbon Dragon Plans ... here is a set for $30! I might caution you. Original Maupin plans normally sell for much more. I know a few other people bought plans who were building their own designs and wanted the CD plans for reference. In deference to the Maupin family and the liability issue, I chose not to sell copies of my plans. Hope you find some plans. If you do build, be sure to use carbon rods in place of carbon tows for the wing spar caps ... see Jim Marske: http://www.marskeaircraft.com/carbonrod.html Sorry, I'm not more help. S. Steve Adkins -------------------------------------------------------------------- Andy, Murry: I don't know whether you noticed or not (depending on whether or not you're EAA members), but Dick Harrington's name just popped up in the latest "Gone West" obit feature of Sport Aviation, along with Paul Poberezny's. Dick had been declining for a long time and was in pretty much of a vegetative state the last time I corresponded with his wife and their son, so his passing is not a shock, but he did play a huge role in the Eastern end of SHA/ESA, as you'll remember, and we should do some sort of obit in the next newsletter. I thought I'd put together my thoughts on the subject, and maybe others will come up with something. Al McCarty is looking in his www.esoaring.com Sincerely, Dave Hudnut (ed. – Dave provided his recollections of Dick and I have included them below.) Dick Harrington O ur old SHA/ESA friend and former Sailplane Builder editor, Dick Harrington, has died in Hancock, NH in his 85th year. His wife, Lorraine, survives him, along with their three children and five grandchildren. Dick was an early member of the Sailplane Homebuilders Association (as we knew it back in the 80s) and a great contributor to the organization both through his very active participation in all the Eastern workshops and through his editorship of Sailplane Builder. It was Dick who took the newsletter from the stapled pages level to the look and feel of a real magazine, with a consistent cover format and better all-around design. He also championed the name-change from SHAp TALK to Sailplane Builder, arguing (as did others) that it more accurately reflected what we were doing in the organization. He was a great advocate of Computer-Aided Design for airplanes and sailplanes, both as a teacher in a local NH tech school and in our workshops, where he tried to move the more oldfashioned amongst us into the 21st Century (or up to the threshold, anyway). There isn’t time at the moment to go into his life’s work, but you can get a rough idea of it if you have access to the October 1992 issue of Sailplane Builder, where he lists his accomplishments. Early in October 2013 Page 4 his life he became a military pilot, both fixed-wing and helicopter, and later he was a bush pilot, an engineer for Hughes Aircraft, and an FBO, among other things. He was an enthusiastic modeler as well as a builder of full-scale aircraft. A few years ago he led his tech school students in the only American entry into the Berblinger solar-powered design contest. Somewhere along the line he built and flew a HiMAX, and in his two workshops (he was never one to do things by halves) there are two incomplete projects, both of his own design: a small airplane and parts of the all-wood motorglider that he brought for demonstration at Harris Hill workshops. We will not forget his terrific energ0y and enthusiasm, his incisive mind, and his many contributions to ESA. Nieuport 17 biplane fighter. The visit was part of the NSM’s effort to reach out to other aviation organizations in the Elmira-Corning area. Dave Hudnut (ed. – The October 1992 issue referenced by Dave is a two page biography and I don’t have enough room for it this month. However, I thought you would enjoy hearing how he got started with the association.) Russ Lee, Jeff Stringer, Jim Marske and Wife Maureen, and Jerry Gross at the Aluminum Rib Forming Station “My affiliation with the SHA began with the first meeting held at Harris Hill near Elmira, New York. That’s when I met the original formulators of the Association, Bob Smith, Bob Storck, Jack Greene, and many more. It was an exciting period and everyone looked forward to the next meeting to be held over the Labor Day weekend, again, at Harris Hill the following year.” -------------------------------------------------------------(ed. – Here is the last of the 2013 ESA Eastern Workshop report submitted by Jerry Gross, Ron Odgen and Al McCarty.) Visit to EAA Chapter 533 S Herb Spicer Squeezes Hard While Jeff Stringer, Jose Otero, and Volker Fritz look on at the Rivet Station aturday afternoon, the Experimental Aircraft Association Chapter 533 at the Elmira-Corning Regional Airport welcomed the attendees for an afternoon working with aircraft aluminum. They created two hands-on projects, which all the ESA attendees participated in: one involved forming wing ribs using a wood form, crimping pliers and bare hands; the other involved driving regular and flush rivets to build two aluminum tool boxes. Handouts on specifications and identification of rivet types were available. Then the EAA members provided snacks and refreshments after the hands-on activities. The ESA attendees got to stroll around and view the aircraft-building projects in the spacious Chapter 533 hangar. Their aircraft included a restored Ryan Navion, and a replica of a WWI www.esoaring.com This Nieuport 17 was One of Many Interesting EAA Chapter 533 Projects October 2013 Page 5 Aerodynamic Study of the Wright Brothers’ 1902 Glider and 1903 Flyer By J. Philip Barnes 06 Oct 2013 success. Indeed, for their 1902 glider, it may have sheltered the canard from stall. But for their 1903 powered “Flyer,” it presented a major obstacle barely overcome by superior piloting skills. This article, excerpted from the author’s “Configuration Aerodynamics” study found at www.HowFliesTheAlbatross.com, reviews and renews our understanding of key aerodynamic features of the Wright Brothers’ 1902 Glider and 1903 Flyer. In particular, we apply a 3D lifting-line computer model to analyze the distributed aerodynamic forces on the 1902 glider, discuss the impact of the changes with the 1903 flyer, and provide a brief historical narrative. Wilbur pilots the original 1902 Glider at the Outer Banks of North Carolina. The Wright Brothers wisely selected the sand dunes of the Outer Banks of North Carolina for their testing. On a windy day, the dunes would provide an updraft to reduce ground speed and to enable slope soaring. But more important, the sand cushioned inevitable hard landings. The original version of the 1902 glider incorporated a fixed double fin which failed to overcome, or perhaps even aided, the adverse yaw which led to many hard landings. With wing warping, a roll to the left was accompanied by an unwanted yaw to the right. Wilbur and Orville T he Wright Brothers brought us the world’s first piloted and powered airplane. They did this without high school diplomas or college degrees. However, they possessed aptitude and persevered over numerous obstacles, often aided by their powerful collaboration. Understanding the importance of learning to control gliding flight before adding power, they became first to independently control pitch, roll, and yaw. The Wrights implemented a system approach to integrate and develop existing and new methods for aerodynamics, flight control, structures, and propulsion. And, not only did they design their own engine, but they also invented aerial propeller theory. Although with their wind-tunnel they measured the “lift-to-drift” of various wing and multi-wing configurations, they did not measure pitching moment, as they did not understand its importance. This lack of understanding did not prevent their www.esoaring.com Notice the modest wing camber and near-zero canard-to-wing decalage. The latter is characteristic of most or all photos of the glider in action, and it provides our first hint that the aircraft was flown “statically unstable” in pitch, where the glider was actively stabilized with small variations in canard incidence set by the pilot holding by eye a fixed horizon. But as noted later, the variations of canard incidence would be far greater for the 1903 Flyer. (See photo at top of the next page.) Upon Wilbur’s discovery of adverse yaw, the Brothers’ powerful collaboration came to the rescue. Orville suggested making the fin movable, thus increasing its ability to generate yawing moments. Wilbur then added that the fin should be coupled with roll to promote coordinated turns. These features, together with changing the “bi-fin” to a “mono-fin,” were implemented with great success. The photo at the right shows coupled roll and yaw in action. The October 2013 Page 6 Isometric view of the 1902 Glider. Dan Tate and Wilbur launch Orville in the modified 1902 glider --------------------------------------right-hand wing incidence has been increased by warping, with the fin deflected trailing-edge-left in an attempt to negate the adverse yaw due to the increased drag on the right-hand wing. With what amounts to an aerodynamic finite-element method, we align horseshoe vortices at the lifting lines (nominally at ¼-chord) of each aerodynamic surface, then solving about 100 linear-simultaneous equations representing the mutual influences of the vortices with the boundary conditions set by the local slope of the “equivalent-plate” airfoil along a downwash line positioned at ¾-chord. The vectorbased approach accommodates sideslip and/or asymmetric geometry, including non-planar and/or vertical surfaces. This is the third photo of the glider supporting our assessment that the average decalage for the canard was near zero. The modified glider enjoyed over a thousand flights, the longest lasting more than a minute. We don’t need a YouTube video to imagine the excitement the brothers must have felt as each took a turn piloting a flight. Plan view of the 1902 Glider with lifting and downwash lines Coupled roll and yaw in action. Rear view of the 1902 Glider We now turn to our 3D lifting-line analysis of the 1902 Wright Glider, beginning with various views of the model. Notice first the lower-wing cutout for the pilot. This in effect transforms the aircraft into somewhat of a triplane, not counting the canard. www.esoaring.com Next we show the spanwise distribution of chordweighted lift, including the effects of pitch trim for the estimated center of gravity position with -5% static margin. The canard lift balances not only the nosedown moment of the wing lift vector acting (at 23% October 2013 Page 7 chord) aft of the c.g., but also the nose-down pitching moment coefficient (-0.02 each) of the modestlycambered wings. Spanwise distribution of lift coefficient Spanwise distribution of chord-weighted lift, 1902 Glider Next is shown the distribution of lift (“normal force”) coefficient. Notice that the canard is loaded about 50% greater than any of the “three” wings. As previously noted, the center of gravity (with pilot) is aft of the aerodynamic center by about 5% of the mean aerodynamic chord. The photos of the glider in flight suggest that this level of pitch instability was manageable. Curiously, if the Wrights had balanced the glider farther forward, the added canard load would risk canard stall with incidence excursions, and this might have delayed or prevented their success. Thus for the 1902 Glider, what the Wrights didn’t know (pitch stability) may have aided success. But that same lack of understanding was nearly disastrous for the 1903 Flyer. With the 1903 Flyer, the brothers dangerously departed from their usual step-by-step approach. Instead of “simply” adding a propulsion system to their 1902 glider, or a scaled-up version thereof, they made significant changes which, initially unknown to them, would have undesirable effects. First, they mounted the engine and propellers well aft of an already tail-heavy c.g. But they also changed the canard from a monoplane to a biplane, doubling both its aerodynamic lift capability and its pitchdestabilizing influence. Whereas the 1902 glider flew at a manageable -5% static margin (+5% would be the norm in the following decades), their 1903 Flyer would now be all but unflyable at -25% static margin, easily twice the instability of a modern fighter aircraft. Front view of the 1903 Flyer The world’s most historic aviation photograph - Wilbur gives chase to Orville - 17 Dec 1903 www.esoaring.com October 2013 Page 8 (ed. - Here is an item from the July1985 issue of SHApTalk, page 5. It is the sort of thing I was talking about in my editorial on how members can contribute to the overall knowledge of the entire group. I am not sure if Radio Shack still carries these items, but if you are interested visit your local store and see what you can find.) ELECTRONIC MEMORY JOGGER We humans would like to believe that our memories are 100 percent reliable but unfortunately this is just not true. We are capable of being distracted by other momentary pressing thoughts like a bee inside the canopy, etc. My first, and hopefully last, wheelup landing in my Vari-Eze motivate some serious thought about ways to assist my feeble mind, like an electrical alert system. The Vari-Eze has a belly board drag device called a landing brake that is very similar to a sailplane spoiler. The theory is that if you deploy or extend your landing device you are probably going to land and you had better have the wheel down. The alert circuit is activated by deployment of the landing device which sends an electrical signal to the wheeldown monitor switch. If the wheel is down, the magnet holds the switch electrically open and no alert is sounded. If not, a pulsing buzzer jogs you back into the world of reality. position with the wheel any place but full down, then you will hear the buzzer. The circuit is simplified by the use of switches that are open when the magnet is near the switch and closed when the magnet is moved away. The hardware for this circuit is available from Radio Shack. The switches are inside a security device, catalog no. 49-512, normally used to insure that a door or window stays closed. The switches could be used in their plastic mounting box, but also can be removed and bonded (glued) to the airframe adding very little weight. The magnet supplied in the mating plastic box can also be removed from the box and bonded to the moving mechanism to be monitored. The pulsing buzzer, catalog no. 273-066, will operated with any voltage from 3 to 28. I use 12v and a 1 amp fuses in an inline fuse holder – catalog no 270-1281. In an attempt to make the circuit as idiot-proof as possible, it is always hot. As most sailplanes have the wheel down for all ground operations, you should never get an inadvertent alert on the ground. Theoretically, if you fly right you will never hear the alert, however an occasional in-flight test is recommended. John H. Kevern New Hartford, NY The same facts stated a different way are: if the wheel is down, you never hear the buzzer. If you move the landing brake/spoiler off of the closed www.esoaring.com October 2013 Page 9 Here are some shots I took of Josh Kneer’s Prue 215 that he has started through the restoration process. He has stripped and painted the fuselage exterior but no work has been done on the interior as of the Western Workshop where he displayed it. At one time this sailplane had a jet engine installed on a pylon over the center section. www.esoaring.com October 2013 Page 10 Classified Ads – Sailplanes/Trailers/Other Schemmp/Hirth Austria SHK-1 serial #7, the fuselage serial number is #130, purchased new from the factory in 1967. The last and best of the German plywood ships. Glide ratio of 38 at 54 mph. I have the logs and manual. The sailplane is in good condition, but needs refinishing. The price is $6,000 including the trailer. See website for pictures: http://ewtq.tripod.com Email: ewt@gci.net Anchorage AK, 99502. Telephone Number: (907)-243-7245. Plans/Kits Sailplane Trailers: plans for 13, 15, 18 & 20 meter. Plan sets incld bills of material, source of material, scale DWGs, construction & DWGs. <RLUEBKE460@aol.com>. 901-767-0495. http://www.oxaero.com/Luebke_Tailers For sale: Unused Carbon Dragon Plans, #295 Hung flat. Best Offer., Guenther Schmidt, PO Box 603, Langley, WA 98260 Miscellaneous For Sale: Modified Pioneer used in videos/flight testing. Comes with trailer & set up stands. US registered. $10,000. For Sale: Monarch F with trailer $8000. For Sale: Incomplete Monarch G for $7500. About 75% done and have all the parts. Mat, mat@amtelecom.net Simine Short’s book Locomotive to Aeromotive: Octave Chanute and the Transportation Revolution. is available from Amazon at: http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/AIW6FWYBBRWZ8/ref=cm_cr_pr_pdp Wanted: Robinson or Pfeiffer Pellet Vario or Memphis Rate of Climb vario. Jim Short, Illinois, 708-301-3198 or <Simajim@comcast.net>. Drafting, Digitizing, 3D modeling, experience in CATIA, CADAM, own AUTOCAD R13, 3D Studio Max and Pro E. 30+years aircraft design engineer experience. Contact Robert Topolse, 909-980-6070. <rtopolse@aol.com>. "Low Power Laminar Aircraft Design" (aerodynamics), "Low Power Laminar Aircraft Technology", "Low Power Laminar Aircraft Structures". $27 ea plus postage and handling $2, Priority $4. Overseas $4 (Airmail $10). Cirila Strojnik, 2337 E. Manhatton, Tempe, AZ 85282. Books by Bruce Carmichael: 34795 Camino Capistrano, Capistrano Beach CA 92624. 949-496-5191 Personal Aircraft Drag Reduction: $30 pp: Low drag R&D history, laminar aircraft design, 300 mph on 100 hp. Ultralight & Light Self Launching Sailplanes: $20 pp: 23 ultralights, 16 lights, 18 sustainer engines, 56 self launch engines, history, safety, prop drag reduction, performance. Collected Sailplane Articles & Soaring Mishaps: $30 pp: 72 articles incl. 6 misadventures, future predictions, ULSP, dynamic soaring, 20 years SHA workshop. Collected Aircraft Performance Improvements: $30 pp: 14 articles, 7 lectures, Oshkosh Appraisal, AR-5 and VMAX Probe Drag Analysis, fuselage drag & propeller location studies. Sailplane Design, by Vittorio Pajno. Price 64.50 Euro, including packaging and shipping. Orders to: Macchione - Via S.d'Acquisto 21100 Varese – Italy, or via the Internet through the site www.macchione.it using a credit card. Many color photos of sailplane construction details, graphs and figures on design of a sailplane. www.esoaring.com October 2013 Page 11 ESA Officers President - Murry Rozansky, 23165 Smith Road, Chatsworth, CA 91311, 818-702-0782. <mirco@jps.net> Term Expires: 12/31/14 Eastern Co-Vice Presidents – Vacant Position – Anyone interested in volunteering contact Murry Rozansky. Central Vice President – Vacant Position – Anyone interested in volunteering contact Murry Rozansky. Western Vice President – Jeff Byard, 13555 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA, 93422, (805)461-0488, <jbyard@thegrid.net> Term Expires: 12/31/13 Secretary – Terry Menees, 2587 W Canyon St., Apache Junction, AZ 85220, (480) 288-6931 <TerryM76@msn.com> Term Expires: 12/31/13 Treasurer – Murry Rozansky, 23165 Smith Road, Chatsworth, CA 91311, 818-702-0782. <mirco@jps.net> Term Expires: 12/31/14 Send your renewals to this address. Sailplane Builder Editor – Andy Kecskes (appointed), 6248 Spruce Lake Ave., San Diego, CA 92119, 619-589-1898. <shaeditor@cox.net> Send all material for Sailplane Builder to these addresses. Webmaster – S. Steve Adkins (appointed), 16624 Jackdaw Path, Lakeville, MN 55044, 952-435-2596 <steve@adkins.name> <www.esoaring.com> or <http://experimentalsoaring.com> I’d like to join or renew my membership in the Experimental Soaring Association. I’d like to update/change my information in the ESA database. NAME_____________________________________________________SSA# (if member)_________________ ADDRESS__________________________________________________COUNTRY (if not US)_____________ CITY______________________________STATE_______ZIP_________E-Mail__________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER______________________________________________________ SAILPLANES CURRENTLY BUILDING__________________________________________ SAILPLANES INTERESTED IN BUILDING_______________________________________ SAILPLANES HAVE BUILT/HELPED BUILD______________________________________ Dues (1-Year) (U.S. Dollars) Free (Full-time student, as defined by SSA) $20 $25 $35 $10 _____ U.S. Student _____ U.S. Regular Membership _____ Canada (Air Mail) _____ All other countries (Air Mail) _____ Electronic Make check payable to: Experimental Soaring Association Mail to: Murry Rozansky, Treasurer 23165 Smith Road Chatsworth, CA 91311 USA Our Bylaws require that ESA have a high percentage of membership also be SSA members. Join the SSA at: www.ssa.org/ www.esoaring.com October 2013 Page 12