PROGRAM INFORMATION Program Assessment Report

advertisement

Program Assessment Report

PROGRAM INFORMATION

Date submitted: _________________

Degree Program(s):

MS

Department:

Computer Science

Department Chair:

Jon Pearce

Report Prepared by:

Soon Tee Teoh

Next Self-Study due :

Phone:

4-5060

Phone:

4-7227

E-mail:

[email protected]

Note: Schedule is posted at: http://www.sjsu.edu/ugs/programplanning/

ARCHIVAL INFORMATION

Location: Person to Contact:

(Bldg/Room #) (Name)

Assessment schedule is posted at http://www.sjsu.edu/ugs/assessment

Please send any changes to the schedule or to student learning outcomes to Jackie Snell [email protected]

(Phone)

MSCS.OC3: Technical communication skills

Initial Evidence of Student Learning:

On a survey sheet, every Thesis Committee member is asked “I feel that this student, who is completing their MS program in Computer Science, has demonstrated through their thesis work, good Technical Communication Skills.” (10 Strongly Agree, 1 Strongly Disagree)”

On this question, all students received scores of 7 to 10 for their Written communication skill, except for one student, who received a score of 1 from one professor. The professor also wrote,

“Student’s English on early drafts was very poor. Many iterations were required on his written report.”

Change(s) to Curriculum or Pedagogy:

It is not clear in what way the written communication skill of the student was not satisfactory.

We have therefore developed a rubrics-based assessment to better identify and analyze the strengths and shortcomings of the students. These rubrics will also be made public so that the students can better prepare themselves in written communication. The rubrics we have developed for Written Communication are:

Page 1 of 2

Program Assessment Report

Organization (5)

Style and

Mechanics (5)

Below Expectation

No apparent organization.

Focus and thesis not well-defined.

(0-1)

Multiple and serious errors of sentence structure.

Frequent errors in spelling and punctuation. (0-1)

Total Score (out of 10)

Satisfactory

Some intelligible ideas. Basic thesis defined but not clearly explained.

Readers have difficulty following the argument from introduction to conclusion. (2-3)

Little or no errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. However, some awkward expressions and little variety in sentences.

(2-3)

Excellent

Thesis and focus clearly defined.

Readers understand goal and contributions of the work. Ideas clearly presented and transitions are smooth. Readers easily follow ideas from introduction to conclusion. (4-5)

Effective and varied sentences, with very few errors.

Words carefully chosen and sentences carefully construction to be effective, powerful and rich. (4-5)

Score

Evidence of Student Learning after Change:

We will implement the rubrics-based assessment this semester. Therefore, we don’t yet have evidence of student learning after making the change.

Page 2 of 2

Download