Department of Kinesiology,
College of Applied Sciences and Arts
Program Planning Committee Report to the Provost
May 3, 2013
Overview
The Department of Kinesiology offers the following programs:
 B.S. in Athletic Training
 B.S. in Kinesiology (emphases include: Adapted Physical Ability, Sport Management, Movement
Science, Pre-Professional Studies, Societal Studies, Individual Studies/STAR 1440 Act, Exercise and
Fitness)
 K-12 Teaching credential program (in conjunction with the School of Education)
 M.A. in Kinesiology (concentrations include: Athletic Training, Exercise Physiology, Sport
Management, Sport Studies, generalized program)
Strengths and Challenges of the Program
The strategic plan 2017 was the strongest component of the Department of Kinesiology Program Planning
document. It presents a vision and a blueprint of what the department will be thriving to achieve in five years.
The assessment plan is an important component of this blueprint and serious consideration should be given to
selecting and implementing authentic assessment strategies to gauge the impact of this vision.
The program plan and the outside evaluator report included the strengths and the challenges facing the
Kinesiology program. The department is currently impacted and, as a result, has developed strategies to improve
enrollment management with particular emphasis on SB 1440 transfer students. The department course offerings
serve both department majors and the university as whole through extensive GE courses. Additionally, the
Department of Kinesiology has served the Santa Clara County community in managing the Timpany Center
since 2009. The Center has a warm water pool, a spa, classroom and research spaces, a gym, and a rehabilitation
physical therapy clinic. The Timpany Center provides access to 5,000 people monthly, and provides a great
opportunity for Kinesiology majors to obtain practical experiences.
The external evaluator cited the following challenges:
1. There are insufficient resources and support to teach graduate course offerings;
2. Additional faculty should be recruited in order to address pedagogical needs in the program, as well as
community needs through management of the Timpany Center;
3. Some emphases within the program are under enrolled. enrollment emphases should be re-organized and
combined with others; and
4. There is a need to improve student advising.
Assessment
It is clear that the Kinesiology faculty have given considerable thought to assessment of student learning in the
programs offered by the department and that there are ongoing efforts to learn from their findings and make
programmatic changes supported by data and faculty reflection.
Undergraduate Program. Student learning assessment information is provided in the appendices of the
program plan for several of the student learning objectives (SLOs) in the major. During the period of review,
new program learning objectives (PLO’s) and SLO’s were developed as a result of program planning. Indirect
assessment of outcomes was assessed using an extensive exit interview questionnaire. Additionally, the report
indicated that the AAC&U critical thinking value rubric was used to assess gains in critical thinking skills by
comparing performance on an essay in a lower-division, introductory course (Kin 70) and in an upper division
(Kin 185) capstone course. It is not clear whether formal statistical analyses were used to evaluate data or
whether conclusions were based on faculty discussion of rubrics; however, no differences were seen between
students in taking the introductory kinesiology course (Kin 70) and the capstone course. Obviously, significant
changes would be expected and some reflection regarding these data was described in the report; however, no
substantive changes in curriculum appear to be under consideration that specifically addresses critical thinking,
1
nor was there discussion of how the validity or reliability of the AAC&U value rubric may have accounted for
their observations. It is also not clear whether this was the same cohort followed over time or two different
cohorts were assessed. Use of similar instruments in the assessment of newly developed PLO’s and SLO’s is
recommended, including more descriptive information regarding the cohorts assessed and methodologies and
analyses used.
The program plan indicated that a major revision of assessment strategies was implemented at the end of the
spring 2012 semester that will reflect the newly developed PLOs and CLOs.
General Education. It appears that primary outcome measures used in GE assessments were percentages of
students obtaining a “C” or better in course assignments associated with specific learning outcomes. It is not
clear whether a common rubric was used in the evaluation of course assignments or whether the grading was
normed between sections. While grades represent the extent to which a student has successfully met the faculty
member's requirements and expectations for a course, the many factors contributing to an assigned grade makes
it almost impossible to make inferences about what a student knows or can do by only looking at the grades for a
course (Rogers, 2003).
Graduate Program Assessment. The M.A. program in Kinesiology was redeveloped in 2008 as a response to
the recommendations of the previous program planning and outside evaluation in 2007. The revised program
reduced the number of concentrations from 11 to five, required a higher GPA for entering the program, and
required a GRE score of > 900. New PLO’s and SLO’s were developed and the report indicated that assessment
would take place in the 2012 spring semester. There was no information about how these were evaluated.
The final step in the program planning process is a scheduled meeting with Provost Junn (or her designee), AVP
of Undergraduate Studies Jaehne, AVP of Graduate Studies and Research Stacks, Dean Bullock, and Department
Chair Reekie. The Chair may invite directors of programs within the department. The department of Kinesiology
should contact the Office of Undergraduate Studies to schedule this final meeting. The following topics for
discussion are summarized from the reports:



Determine appropriate faculty resources for undergraduate/graduate programs, including those
for GE;
Identify strategies for the improvement of assessment strategies that will impact long-term
outcomes such as improved graduation rates;
Improved strategies to increase faculty scholarship involving students.
The Program Planning Committee recommends acceptance of the Program Plan. The Program Plan provided a
good examination of current, and ongoing, issues and an explanation of plans for subsequent reviewers. The next
program plan for Kinesiology will be due to Dean Bullock by Fall 2016.
Spring 2013 University Planning Committee Members
Debra Caires (Chair)
Yasue Kodama Yanai
Amy D’Andrade
Anthony Raynsford
Alaka Rao
Sutee Sujitparapitaya
Dennis Jaehne
Julio Soto
Pam Stacks
Diana Wu
Linda Main
Mary Wilson
CC:
Michael Crump
Wenbin Wei
Jinny Rhee
Jeffrey Hummel
Lynda Heiden
Mary Calegari
Shirley L. Reekie, Chair, Department of Kinesiology
Charles Bullock Dean, College of Applied Sciences and Arts
Alice Hines, Interim Associate Dean, College of Applied Sciences and Arts
Shannon Bros-Seemann, Chair, Curriculum and Research
Dennis Jaehne, AVP Undergraduate Studies
Pam Stacks, AVP Graduate Studies and Research
2
Appendix
Description of the Department and Programs:
Program Plan submitted in March, 2012.
Kinesiology offers courses in GE. The number of majors increased from 778 (fall 2007) to 845
(fall 2011).
Program Modifications
Program modifications during the period of review included a revision of core courses, the
complete re-development of their M.A. program, and the proposed renovation of the current
facilities to begin in spring 2013.
One of the recommendations for the previous review that was discussed in the report is the
inadequate number of faculty members in the Department of Kinesiology. The report indicates
that faculty were hired, but the exact number of hired and current faculty was neither in the report
or the appendices.
Faculty
Tenured and tenure-track faculty
This information was not provided either in the program planning report or the appendix.
Scholarly, University, and Professional Activity
The program plan reported that faculty are engaged in scholarly activity. However, a table in the
report or in the appendix section showing the number of publications was not included.
Part-time Faculty/Lecturers:
This information was not provided either in the program planning report or the appendix.
Internal and External Funding
The program plan reported that faculty have obtained funding internally and externally to support
research. However, a table in the report or in the appendix section showing the number grants
obtained was not included.
Clerical Support
This information was not provided either in the program planning report or the appendix.
Use of Technology, Equipment, and Facilities
This information was not provided either in the program planning report or the appendix.
College Committee Summary:



The committee recognizes the need for additional faculty in order to maintain the
continuity in courses that require an expertise in exercise and rehabilitative science and
teacher education. Currently, many of their sections are running at full and/or over
capacity.
To decrease program costs, the committee recognizes that many of their degree emphases
could be consolidated in the future; however, providing course-offering rotations would
provide a limited economical benefit.
The committee agrees to examine ways to increase numbers within their graduate athletic
training program, and is confident that they can and are strategically planning for student
growth, along with the anticipation of being able to hire a new TT faculty member in the
future.
3
The committee agrees that a strong program structure and up-to-date research opportunities
provide a vibrant program, even during tough economic times. Their continued involvement and
dedication to the community (Timpany Center) provides faculty numerous research opportunities,
along with student hands-on internship/research projects.
External Reviewer (Key Points)
The external reviewer commended the Kinesiology faculty for being: actively engaged in their
program’s progression and strategic plan; proactive in their design, approach, and delivery of
pedagogy; and their innovative creation and demonstration of a structured, positive, and practical
student learning community.

Adding two tenure-track faculty positions pedagogy/adapted physical education at this
time is critical step for maintaining the quality of the program and alleviating workload
issues. Future hires should only include exercise science and pedagogy, with an emphasis
in adapted physical education.

The undergraduate program should be reorganized and simplified in order better to
address student demand and community needs.

The undergraduate sport management program might eliminated or else merged with the
emphasis in Societal Studies, and the emphasis in Movement Science might also merge
with Pre-Professional emphasis, thus reducing redundancy and facilitating advising.

There are serious concerns about the future viability of the Athletic Training Education
Program, resulting from a combination of low enrollments, insufficient mentoring, and
accreditation problems at the graduate level.

SJSU’s Physical Activity Program and requirement is important and should be continued
within the Department of Kinesiology.

Course scheduling should be made more predictable, published more in advance, and
expanded to accommodate various schedules to facilitate timely graduation.

Recognition for department-led scholarship and faculty vitae should be placed on the
department website.

Opportunities should be created for interdisciplinary endeavors within Kinesiology.

A wider range of faculty expertise should be brought to the work of the Timpany Center.

New faculty should be formally mentored and assisted in adapting to the high cost of
living in Silicon Valley.

The Kinesiology student clubs should become more visible on campus.

Student advising should be enhanced to accommodate enrollment increases.

The facilities need renovation and reconfiguration, dedicating separate spaces for
teaching, research, labs, computer work, and student meetings.
4

The air-conditioning needs to be installed or repaired as soon as possible.
Reviewer: Terry L. Rizzo, Professor/Chair of Kinesiology,
CSU, San Bernardino, July 2, 2012
Dean’s Report
Dean Bullock had no additional comments. If the program wants to propose additional issues for
the meeting, please discuss the appropriateness of the topics with Dean Charles Bullock.
5