DUAL LANGUAGE AND ENGLISH LEARNER EDUCATION San Diego State University San Diego, CA 92182-1153 • EBA 248 • (619) 594-5155 ED 795A & 795B Master’s Project Seminar COURSE SYLLABUS Spring 2016 ED 795A Instructor: Ricardo Medina, Ph.D. Room: NE 273 Email: ricardo.medina@cvesd.org ED 795B Instructor: Cristina Alfaro, Ph.D. Room: EBA 251 Email: calfaro@mail.sdsu.edu Office Hours: By Appointment Course Overview Scholarly research can be a daunting task, especially for working teachers like you. The objective of this course is to facilitate, with ongoing support, your journey in becoming a teacher/scholar. With collaborative effort, instruction, and explicit feedback, this course will facilitate the research process. This course is the continuation of your DLE 650 project and the first part of your capstone project for your Master of Arts degree. It is a culminating experience that affords the opportunity to apply what you have learned in your coursework to your own as critical educator and researcher. The objective of this course is to explore a question in depth via research and scholarly work. This work will be driven by a critical research question of your own design. It can relate to program evaluation, evaluation of curriculum or instruction, teaching, teachers, learning, or learners. This format will accommodate a variety of project ideas, including curriculum development and evaluation, qualitative research, quantitative research and mixed methods. How is DLE 650, ED 795A and 795B related? In DLE 650 students identify an area of interest, conduct an initial review of the literature, and design a research study addressing a question or problem based on their contextual reality. In ED 795A, the research plan is refined, finalized, and implemented; data are collected and analyzed. The final product of ED 795B is where data is finalized and analyzed; results are incorporated into a research report written in APA journal article format. Additionally, through a Poster Presentation research is presented at a professional conference [SDCOE Dual Language/English Language Development Conference—March 29, 2016]. The final product for ED 795B is a report of the research conducted. This final project includes all of the components and final work from ED 795A. The final master’s project will consist of four chapters: Chapter 1—Introduction to the topic and review of the literature Chapter 2—Project methodology Chapter 3—Report of results Chapter 4: Discussion and conclusion (see below for more detailed information) o Conference Research Poster Presentation (March 29th) Action Research and Course Outcomes Your task this semester for ED 795A is to write your final draft of chapters 1, 2, 7 3. In 795B, you will then conduct and finalize your research following your methodological design, analyze the results, and write chapter 4 and present a research poster presentation at a local conference (arranged by professor). As is typical with research, you should anticipate that chapters 1, 2, 3 would be revised further during 795B. The manuscript format, including appendices, final abstract (written in 795B), text headings, text font, pagination, citations and references, must follow the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.), commonly known as “APA style.” This semester, you may find it natural to write your text in present or future tense (e.g., “The purpose of this research will be…”) however, your final report for 795B will be written in the past tense because the research will have been completed (e.g., “The purpose of this research was…”) Required Text: Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Research (4th ed). Lincoln, NE: Sage. Hinchey, P. (2008). Action Research. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. New York, NY. Other Related Texts: Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed). Lincoln, NE: Pearson. *This will be provided by instructor via electronic file. Reed, Jan. (2007). Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Review of the Literature Research web sites, literature from books and articles must include 40 sources. Your bibliography will include 40 sources and a minimum of 25 will be integrated into your final report. Your literature review must include a minimum of 4 empirical research studies related to your research project. * This syllabus is subject to modifications. Changes to this syllabus will be announced via email. It is the students’ responsibility to be aware of changes/modifications. Course Meetings The course schedule and due dates are described below. This is largely driven by the work you complete as you conduct research and write; professor will schedule individual meetings with all students. In addition, communication can occur at anytime via email, Skype, or telephone. Keep in mind that you can initiate a meeting anytime throughout the semester! ED 795A & B – Spring 2016 SEMINAR CALENDAR Week/ Date 1. 1/20 2. 1/27 Topic Introduction to Class Ideology, Research, and Praxis Students summarize progress on their research project March 29th Poster Conference Presentation No Class Meeting How Does Your Ideology Inform your Research? Research Approach Review of the Literature Use of Theory Writing Strategies and Ethical Considerations Assignment Due Creswell Part I Research Template BB Assignment Review of Literature Progress/Plan 3: 2/3 Review of Creswell Part I Ideology, Research, and Praxis Quantitative, Qualitative, & Mixed Methods Planning completion of your projects Project Timeline 4. 2/10 No Class Meeting Analyzing, Coding, and Reporting Results Creswell Part II Research Template BB Assignment 2/12 Friday (9-12:30) 5. 2/17 Voice Your Language Conference @ SDSU Featuring Juan Felipe Herrera Review of Creswell Part II Schedule Research Meetings with students Literature Review Due February 29 Literature Review Guidelines Directions: Develop a process as you begin your literature reading. When reading journal articles, book chapters, and other sources ask yourself questions like the ones below and take notes around those that are most relevant. Be sure to include the complete reference: Title, Author, Year, Journal/Book Title Volume & Number. If found on the web copy exact URL and date of retrieval along with all author/reference information (Please refer to APA style format) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Has the author formulated a problem/issue? Is it clearly defined? Is its significance (scope, severity, relevance) clearly established? Could the problem have been approached more effectively from another perspective? What is the author's research orientation (e.g., interpretive, critical science, combination)? What is the author's theoretical framework (e.g., psychological, developmental, feminist)? What is the relationship between the theoretical and research perspectives? Has the author evaluated the literature relevant to the problem/issue? Does the author include literature-taking positions she or he does not agree with? In a research study, how good are the basic components of the study design (e.g., population, intervention, outcome)? How accurate and valid are the measurements? Is the analysis of the data accurate and relevant to the research question? Are the conclusions validly based upon the data and analysis? In material written for a popular readership, does the author use appeals to emotion, one-sided examples, or rhetorically charged language and tone? Is there an objective basis to the reasoning, or is the author merely "proving" what he or she already believes? How does the author structure the argument? Can you "deconstruct" the flow of the argument to see whether or where it breaks down logically (e.g., in establishing cause-effect relationships)? In what ways does this book or article contribute to our understanding of the problem under study, and in what ways is it useful for practice? What are the strengths and limitations? How does this book or article relate to the specific thesis or question I am developing? WRITING THE METHODOLOGY SECTION This section should describe the rationale and process of your research. This section should lie out the steps of your project so another person could potentially carry out similar research. Suggested Sections (Refer to Creswell) 1. Introduction – philosophical rationale (i.e., why case study, action research, ethnography, etc. CONTEXT OF YOUR STUDY! 2. Research process – Details of how the study was carried out 3. Position of the Researcher – Indicate if you are a participant, observer, etc. your role as researcher and teacher for example. 4. Participants – who was involved, how were they selected, how many, etc. 5. Data Collection Process – Technique a. b. c. d. e. Interview Observation Documents, media, artifacts Test Scores Recording information (field notes, tapes, etc) 6. Data Analysis Procedure – How did you evaluate the data? How did you code? 7. Limitations (could also be in your introduction) – What were the limits to this research? Bias? Etc. Master’s Project 795A: Chapters I, II, and III; 795B: Chapter IV & Poster Presentation TITLE PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT (A 100-150 word description of your study) KEYWORDS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE (What are you studying and why should you study it? This chapter reports work that others have done (primary sources) related to both theory and research relevant to your topic or question (20-25 pages) Introduction/Background/Context Purpose (Why is this study important?) Definition of Terms Literature Review- Important studies pertinent to your problem are described (What do others say about this area of study?) Important Note: The review of web sites and literature from books and articles must include 40 sources. Your bibliography will include 40 sources and a minimum of 25 of those sources will be integrated into your (references on your master’s project final report. Theories and research perspectives, including current and historical studies Research question(s) CHAPTER II: METHODOLOGY (How did you do the study?) (5-8 pages) Participants (school demographics, classroom demographics, subjects or participants Instruments (tests, interviews, observation, documents, surveys) Procedures Data analysis (what will you do with the data? How will you analyze it?) Limitations of the Study Be sure to change the language of this section to the past tense. CHAPTER III: RESULTS (What did you find out?) (5-8 pages) Statement of the Question Results of the Study (report results arranged by themes-can use charts, tables, graphs. Give evidence. Be sure to answer the question but just give the facts; don’t offer your comments on the results here.) CHAPTER IV: DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS (What does it mean?) (7-10 pages) Interpretations/Recommendations and Conclusions (now you can make “jumps” from facts to what you think they mean and relate findings to research in the review) CONFERENCE POSTER PRESENTATIONS PER DLE 650 UPDATES AND FINAL RESEARCH PROJECT RESULTS Do not Copy! To be developed with Ricky! 6. 2/22 7. 2/29 8. 9. 10/23 10. 10/30 11. 11/06 12. 11/13 13. 11/20 14. 11/27 15. 12/04 16. 12/11 Individual Research Conference Meetings 7:00 – 8:00 p.m. Demo II – Technical Writing – Literature Review, Results Section 8:00-9:15 p.m. Individual student meetings to monitor progress to date. 7:00- 8:00 p.m. Demo III - Results – strategies for writing your final report. 8:00-9:15 p.m. Individual student meetings to monitor progress to date. INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 CLASS MEETING Peer Project Reviews & Update INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 INDIVIDUAL MEETINGS - BA 258 Project Presentations – Student Evaluations & Celebration Progress Plan Draft 1: Project Paper Draft II: Project Paper Due Final Project Papers