KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COURSE PROPOSAL OR REVISION, Cover Sheet (10/02/2002) Course Number/Program Name EDUC 9000 Department Bagwell College of Education Degree Title (if applicable) Doctor of Education (EdD) Proposed Effective Date Fall 2006 Check one or more of the following and complete the appropriate sections: X New Course Proposal Course Title Change Course Number Change Course Credit Change Course Prerequisite Change Course Description Change Sections to be Completed II, III, IV, V, VII I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III I, II, III Notes: If proposed changes to an existing course are substantial (credit hours, title, and description), a new course with a new number should be proposed. A new Course Proposal (Sections II, III, IV, V, VII) is required for each new course proposed as part of a new program. Current catalog information (Section I) is required for each existing course incorporated into the program. Minor changes to a course can use the simplified E-Z Course Change Form. Submitted by: Faculty Member Approved _____ Date Not Approved Department Curriculum Committee Date Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Not Approved Department Chair Date School Curriculum Committee Date School Dean Date GPCC Chair Date Dean, Graduate Studies Date Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Not Approved Vice President for Academic Affairs Date Approved Not Approved President Date KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COURSE/CONCENTRATION/PROGRAM CHANGE I. Current Information (Fill in for changes) Page Number in Current Catalog Course Prefix and Number Course Title Credit Hours Prerequisites Description (or Current Degree Requirements) II. Proposed Information (Fill in for changes and new courses) Course Prefix and Number ________EDUC 9000______________________ Course Title _______Doctoral Seminar______ ________ Credit Hours 3-0-3 (Repeatable) Prerequisites 12 hours of graduate level research courses Description (or Proposed Degree Requirements) Once doctoral students in the Bagwell College of Education have completed their programs of study in elementary and early childhood education, educational leadership, middle and secondary education or special education/ESOL, they begin the dissertation phase. The dissertation phase is guided by doctoral seminar that addresses: (1) development of a concept paper that frames the dissertation, and (2) admission to candidacy through a college-approved qualifying experience. Initially, the graduate student is required to write a concept paper that clearly, and concisely, describes the overarching constructs, the research question and the conceptual framework of the first three chapters of the dissertation. Once the concept paper is officially approved by the doctoral committee, the graduate student must pass the qualifying experience which may be an examination or paper. Based upon the successful completion of the qualifying experience, the student is admitted to candidacy. This is a three-credit seminar which may be repeated. III. Justification The first seminar introduces doctoral students to basic research planning that provides opportunities for them to work with their peers in pairs, small groups as well as individually, with their committees. As doctoral students begin to conceptualize their research and write their proposals, the discussion focuses upon the requirements of the Bagwell College of Education, the general form of an acceptable concept paper as well as a review of matching qualitative and quantitative methods to researchable educational questions. At this point, students in this seminar conduct peer reviews determining (1) clarity of writing, and (2) adequacy of the research design. Through peer critique, the doctoral students develop a sense of what is required to achieve candidacy. Once the concept paper is approved by the Doctoral Committee, each student works individually with their doctoral committee to identify, and successfully complete, the appropriate qualifying experience. IV. Additional Information (for New Courses only) Instructor:Varied Text: American Psychological Association, (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D. C., Author. Prerequisites: 12 hours of graduate level research courses Objectives: Form the Doctoral Committee and identify the Chairperson Gain approval of the draft of concept paper Conduct peer reviews in development of concept paper Obtain approval of the concept paper from Doctoral Committee Select appropriate format of qualifying experience, e.g. paper, oral or examination Pass qualifying experience Admission to candidacy Submit appropriate forms to the KSU Institutional Review Board for approval Instructional Method -Small group, large group, individual conferencing, writing & researching Method of Evaluation -Self, peer, professor review V. Resources and Funding Required (New Courses only) Resource Amount Faculty Other Personnel Equipment Supplies Travel New Books New Journals Other (Specify) TOTAL Funding Required Beyond Normal Departmental Growth VI. COURSE MASTER FORM This form will be completed by the requesting department and will be sent to the Office of the Registrar once the course has been approved by the Office of the President. The form is required for all new courses. DISCIPLINE COURSE NUMBER COURSE TITLE FOR LABEL (Note: Limit 16 spaces) CLASS-LAB-CREDIT HOURS Approval, Effective Term Grades Allowed (Regular or S/U) If course used to satisfy CPC, what areas? Learning Support Programs courses which are required as prerequisites EDUCATION (EDUC) 9000 Doctoral Seminar 3-0-3 (Repeatable) Fall 2006 S/U/IP APPROVED: ________________________________________________ Vice President for Academic Affairs or Designee __ Bagwell College of Education M.Ed. Program EDUC XXXX Doctoral Seminar Template EDUC XXXX Doctoral Seminar Kennesaw State University Bagwell College of Education Department Department phone number: Department Semester XXXX I. INSTRUCTOR: e-mail: web page: office phone: CLASS MEETING: IV: TEXTS Required: American Psychological Association, (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D. C., Author. Optional: See reference list as appropriate to study. V. CATALOG COURSE DESCRIPTIONS: Once doctoral students in the Bagwell College of Education have completed their programs of study in elementary and early childhood education, educational leadership, middle and secondary education or special education/ESOL, they begin the dissertation phase. The dissertation phase is guided by doctoral seminar that addresses: (1) development of a concept paper that frames the dissertation, and (2) admission to candidacy through a college-approved qualifying experience. Initially, the graduate student is required to write a concept paper that clearly, and concisely, describes the overarching constructs, the research question and the conceptual framework of the first three chapters of the dissertation. Once the concept paper is officially approved by the doctoral committee, the graduate student must pass the qualifying experience which may be an examination or paper. Based upon the successful completion of the qualifying experience, the student is admitted to candidacy. This is a three-credit seminar which may be repeated. VI. PURPOSE/RATIONALE: The first seminar introduces doctoral students to basic research planning that provides opportunities for them to work with their peers in pairs, small groups as well as individually, with their committees. As doctoral students begin to conceptualize their research and write their proposals, the discussion focuses upon the requirements of the Bagwell College of Education, the general form of an acceptable concept paper as well as a review of matching qualitative and quantitative methods to researchable educational questions. At this point, students in this seminar conduct peer reviews determining (1) clarity of writing, and (2) adequacy of the research design. Through peer critique, the doctoral students develop a sense of what is required to achieve candidacy. Once the concept paper is approved by the Doctoral Committee, each student works individually with their doctoral committee to identify, and successfully complete, the appropriate qualifying experience. VII. VII. COURSE AND OBJECTIVES Form the Doctoral Committee and identify the Chairperson Gain approval of the draft of concept paper Conduct peer reviews in development of concept paper Obtain approval of the concept paper from Doctoral Committee Select appropriate format of qualifying experience, e.g. paper, oral or examination Pass qualifying experience Admission to candidacy Submit appropriate forms to the KSU Institutional Review Board for approval CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK SUMMARY Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching and Learning and Leadership “The Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching and Learning” is the basis for all of Kennesaw State University’s teacher education programs. Working from a solid content background, the teacher as facilitator demonstrates proficient and flexible use of different ways of teaching to actively engage students in learning. Teachers as facilitators are well versed in the characteristics of students of different ages, abilities and cultural backgrounds. They are skilled in integrating technology into instruction and create an environment in which students can be successful and want to learn. Teachers as facilitators know when and how to assess learning by means of various forms of traditional and authentic assessments. They are well prepared for successful careers in teaching and are expected to act in a professional manner in all circumstances with colleagues, parents, community members and their own students. As a professional educator, the teacher facilitator values collaboration and seeks opportunities to work with other professionals and community members to improve the educational experiences for children and youth. This course contributes to the candidates’ understanding of their developing role as a professional facilitator by supporting their educational growth as they learn to effectively teach students. Use of Technology: Candidates in the doctoral program are expected to utilize technology to support the research process, collect data, manage information, analyze data and / or write and revise the dissertation as appropriate. Diversity A variety of materials and instructional strategies will be employed to meet the needs of the different learning styles of diverse learners in class. Candidates will gain knowledge as well as an understanding of differentiated strategies and curricula for providing effective instruction and assessment within multicultural classrooms. One element of course work is raising candidate awareness of critical multicultural issues. A second element is to cause candidates to explore how multiple attributes of multicultural populations influence decisions in employing specific methods and materials for every student. Among these attributes are ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, gender, giftedness, disability, language, religion, family structure, sexual orientation, and geographic region. An emphasis on cognitive style differences provides a background for the consideration of cultural context. Kennesaw State University provides program accessibility and accommodations for persons defined as disabled under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. A number of services are available to support students with disabilities within their academic program. In order to make arrangements for special services, students must visit the Office of Disabled Student Support Services (770-423- 6443) and develop an individual assistance plan. In some cases, certification of disability is required. Please be aware that there are other support/mentor groups on the campus of Kennesaw State University that address each of the multicultural variables outlined above. For more information contact the Student Life Center at 770-423-6280. VIII. COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND ASSIGNMENTS: IX. Select Doctoral Committee Develop, defend, and gain Doctoral Committee approval for the concept paper Develop and successfully complete the qualifying experience. IRB approval EVALUATION AND GRADING: Only Pass/Fail and In Progress grades will be given. To successful complete the doctoral seminar; two tasks have to be accomplished. The first is to write progressively improved drafts of your concept paper by fully participating in the critique of fellow students’ proposals - an important means for progressive improvement. Second, successfully complete the qualifying experience. All the reading assignments, class lectures and activities are devoted to assisting your progress. This is a three-credit seminar which may be repeated. X. ACADEMIC HONESTY STATEMENT: The KSU Graduate Catalog states “KSU expects that graduate students will pursue their academic programs in an ethical, professional manner. Any work that students present in fulfillment of program or course requirements should reflect their own efforts, achieved without giving or receiving any unauthorized assistance. Any student who is found to have violated these expectations will be subject to disciplinary action.” XI. CLASS ATTENDANCE POLICY: Attendance is required for this class session, and candidates are expected to be on time.. Class discussions, group work, and activities require that everyone be present. There is no way to “make up” this class. XII. COURSE OUTLINE (Tentative and Subject to Change) Class # and Date Readings XIII. Assignments REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY (To be adapted) Bazeley, P., Richards, L. (2000). Preface. The NVivo qualitative project book. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications. Creswell, J. (2004). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Dooley, D. (2001). Social research methods. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Galvan, J. L. (2004). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. (2 nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Glasser, W. (1997). A new look at school failure and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, April 1997, 597-602. Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1987). Looking in classrooms (4th Ed.). New York: Harper & Row. Hessle, K. & Holloway, J. (2002) A framework for school leaders: Linking the ISLLC standards to practice. Educational Testing Service. Holly, M. L., Arhar, J., & Kasten, W. (2005). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. (2 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Hubbard, R. S. & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers. York, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers. Huck, S. H, Cromier, W. H. & Bounds, W. G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publisher. Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (1996). Awakening the sleeping giant: Leadership development for teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Kellogg Foundation (1996). Celebrations & challenges: A report on science education improvement. W.K. Kellogg Foundation, One Michigan Avenue East, Battle Creek, MI 49017-4058. LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Merrill Prentice Hall. Litwin, M. S. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications. Lyne, L. S. (2003). A cross section of educational research: Journal articles for discussion and evaluation. (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications. Maxwell, J. A. (2002). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. M. A. Huberman & M. B. Miles. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications: 37-64. McIntyre, D. & Byrd, D. (Eds.) (2000). Research on effective models for teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. McMillan, J. H. (2000). Educational research: fundamentals for the consumer. (3 rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York, Longman. Merriam, S. B., & Simpson, E. L. (2000). A guide to research for educators and trainers of adults. Malabar, FL, Krieger Publishing Company. Mertler, C. A. & Charles, C. M. (2005). Introduction to educational research. Boston: Pearson AB Longman. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Mills, G.E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. (2 nd ed.). Upper Saddle River NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Odell, S.J., Huling, L., & Sweeny, B.W. (2000). Conceptualizing quality mentoring, background information. In S.J. Odell & L. Huling (Eds.), Quality mentoring for novice teachers (pp.3-14). Indianapolis, IA: Kappa Delta Pi. Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R. & Gibbson, H. (1998). Teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Patten, M. L. (2000). Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. Los Angeles, CA, Pyrczak Publishing. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Los Angeles, SAGE Publishing. Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Schonlau, M., Fricker, R. D. & Elliott, M. N. (2001). Conducting research surveys via e-mail and the web. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Publications. Selwyn, N., & Robson, K., (1998). Using e-mail as a research tool. [Electronic Version] Social Research Update, 21. Retrieved October 14, 2003, from http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU21.html Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. (3 rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Simon, M. K., & Francis, J. B. (1988). The proposal cookbook: A step by step guide to proposal design and writing. Bloomington, MN, MicroFutures, Inc. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: National Center for Social Research. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Educational psychology has fallen, but it can get up. Educational psychology review, 8(2), 175-185. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26, 127-140. Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications. DOCTORAL PROGRAM CHECKLIST There are many points to follow from admission to graduation. Use this checklist as a basic guide to help you through the process by indicating the date of completion of each activity. Date 1. _____ Submit application materials Application form (hard copy or on-line); documentation of GRE score; transcripts; 3 letters of recommendation; documentation of 2 years of experience; writing sample 2. _____ Interview with admissions committee 3. _____ Admission to the program 4. _____ Advising Information about program requirements may be obtained from the Graduate School Catalog 5. _____ Select Doctoral Prospectus Committee This committee must consist of at least 4 members including the committee chairperson and one other faculty member from your department and at least one member from outside of the department. 6. _____ Prospectus Plan Approval After the prospectus committee has been formed, doctoral students must work with their committee to design a program of study that satisfies the Department. 7. _____ Maintain active student status Students who do not enroll in classes for a period of two semesters must apply for readmission to the program. 8. _____ Qualifying Examination or Paper and Admission to Candidacy (FORM) Students are only admitted to candidacy after satisfactory completion of all course work, prospectus and qualifying examinations. 9. _____ Dissertation Proposal Approval A complete dissertation proposal (usually equivalent to the first three chapters of the dissertation: Purpose/rationale; literature review; and method) must be submitted to the committee, and approved in a committee meeting. 10. _____ Review College Guidelines for Dissertation Documents A Guide to the Preparation of Dissertations is available from the Office of Graduate Studies. 11. _____ Maintain active student status Students must enroll in three hour seminars each fall and spring semester or two hours each summer semester during candidacy. One semester without courses may be permitted. 12. _____ Institutional Review Board Approval (FORM) For research using human subjects, an IRB form, available in the Office of Graduate Studies must be submitted. 13. _____ Carry out dissertation research/complete dissertation manuscript For information about the format of the dissertation manuscript, see…… 14.______ Intent to Graduate Degree Application (FORM) Early in the semester of graduation, a degree application must be processed. Ed.D. students should obtain a copy of this form, complete it and submit to department chair. 15. _____ College of Education/University Graduate School Announcement of Dissertation Defense An announcement of the final defense examination must be submitted one month prior to the oral defense. 16. _____ First submission of dissertation Doctoral candidates must submit copies of their completed dissertation with all appendices and a letter of transmittal.