DRAFT OF A RECOMMENDATION FOR A NEW ENERGY EFFICIENCY UTILITY STRUCTURE DPS Proposed Revision to Address Structural and Related Issues January 16, 2008 revision This draft has been developed from the earlier draft of a number of participants in the workshop process established by the Vermont Public Service Board on July 12, 2007 to address possible alternative structures for Vermont’s Energy Efficiency Utility. It reflects the Departments view of what it regards as the core structural and related items consistent with the Board’s scope of this proceeding. The Department offers this narrow-down version in the spirit of establishing areas of consensus, broad agreement, and to highlight areas where there are some lingering differences on the core issues of structure and aspects of the proposal related to structure. Part I. General Structure, Terms and Conditions of EEU Appointment 1. Legal Mechanism. A. The Parties agree that the Board should, at this time, establish a single mechanism, one or more EEUs, for the acquisition of cost-effective demand-side resources, including planning and delivery of Comprehensive Energy Efficiency Programs that are called for as a part of the provision of regulated utility service under 30 V.S.A. § 218c. An EEU shall be the subject of an Order of Appointment to be issued by the Board under its existing authority conferred pursuant to 30 V.S.A. §209(d)(2). B. An EEU, if not otherwise defined as such, shall not become a “company” under 30 V.S.A. § 201 as a result of becoming subject to an Order of Appointment. Entities may petition the Board to be appointed an EEU. Upon appointment, an EEU may not abandon or curtail any responsibilities associated with the appointment without first obtaining the approval of the Board. Part II. Planning, Performance Review, Evaluation and Ongoing Appointment An Order of Appointment shall establish the following framework for Planning, Operations, Performance Review, Evaluation and Ongoing Appointment: 1. Basic Framework A. Schedule. EEUs cycles of planning, evaluation and performance review are all inter-related (see timeline presenting “Cycles for Planning, Performance Review, Evaluation and Ongoing Appointment,” at the end of this section). These can usefully be broken down into the following components, each of which has a unique purpose, timing and process, which is further defined below: EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan (DRP) Setting, Review and Resetting of Quantitative Performance Indicators including the establishment of applicable minimum requirements Overall Performance Assessment of Appointed Entity End-of-Cycle Reconsideration of Appointment Independent 3rd-Party Audit Ongoing Opportunity to Consider the Appointment Ongoing Monitoring, Savings Verification and Evaluation 2. EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan A. Purpose. The EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan will provide a set of operating assumptions for future resource acquisition and costs. This DRP will provide short-term (e.g., 3-year) savings goals and budgets that can serve as the basis of performance indicators to assess EEUs performance. It will also provide operating assumptions for long-term (e.g. 20-year) budgets and savings that can be used for long-term resource planning by the EEUs, the DPS, Distribution Utilities and VELCO. Proposed budgets shall address the objective of achieving all reasonably available, cost-effective energy efficiency savings in accordance with 30 V.S.A. §209(d)(4) The 20-year values can also be used by an EEU as the basis for bids in the ISO New England Forward Capacity Market and potential financing agreements. B. Description. The EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan will be a set of yearby-year values for EEU demand-side resource acquisition savings goals and associated budgets by calendar year for the twenty-year period following a Board Order adopting the plan. C. Timeframe. The process for developing a DRP shall normally be timed to conclude one year before the year when it would become effective. In the transition period, the first DRP may conclude no later than six months prior to the year where it would become effective D. Requirements and Process i. The EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan will be for a twenty-year period and will be updated every three years. ii. The starting point for any changes in values for savings and goals will be the values from the last Twenty-Year EEU Demand Resources Plan iii. Resource acquisition goals and associated budgets will be proposed to the Board by the DPS,. EEUs and other parties may also propose goals and budgets. Proposals shall be informed by: (a) relevant evaluations and potential studies conducted by the DPS and EEUs implementers, as well as any relevant evaluations or market assessments presented by other interested parties (b) changes in technology, markets, and baseline considerations such as may be impacted by codes and standards that affect the need for market intervention through an EEU, including: (i) the extent to which baseline efficiency levels have changed; (ii) the extent to which markets have been transformed; (iii) the extent to which market-based energy service and product providers are able to capture cost-effective efficiency opportunities (iv) the extent to which new technologies and/or strategies can be expected to create new opportunities for cost-effective resource acquisition; (v) changes in avoided costs, rates, and the development of other markets that may impact assessments of cost-effective resource potential (e.g., ISO-NE FCM, RGGI) iv. Proposals shall contain supporting analyses for one or more sets of proposed values for twenty-year resource acquisition goals and associated budgets. v. The determination of demand-side resource goals and associated budgets shall be guided by the objectives and criteria of 30 VSA §218c, §209(d), §209(e), §202(a), and other applicable sections of Vermont statutes, as well as prior Board Orders. vi. Any interested party including EEUs may present additional proposals, recommendations, or responses to proposals made. If the parties present markedly different proposals or recommendations, the Board may seek to resolve the disputes after notice and opportunity for hearing. vii. The Board should provide any EEU, the DPS, Vermont Utilities, other stakeholders, and any other person or entity which qualifies for intervention under Board Rule 2.209, an opportunity to submit comments and participate in a technical workshop prior to adopting an EEU Long-Term Demand Resources Plan. 3. Set, Review and Reset of Quantitative Performance Indicators (QPIs) A. Purpose. The Board shall set Quantifiable Performance Indicators by which the performance of an EEU can be measured over specified time periods. B. Description. EEU Quantifiable Performance Indicators shall be of two types: “Scaled Performance Indicators” (e.g., MWh, MW, TRB, market penetration) and “Minimum Requirements” (e.g., portfolio cost-effectiveness, yield, equity indicators). The Board shall conduct a process to determine which indicators to use for each category, and the values to be set for each indicator. While many indicators may be set to be achieved over a three-year performance period (e.g., MWh, MW, TRB), some may lend themselves to other performance periods (a market transformation indicator might set to a six year or longer period). At all times subject to the term of any Appointment, the activities and performance of an EEU shall be subject to such minimum performance requirements as may be established by the Board. The Board shall have the authority to amend an EEU’s minimum performance requirements at any time during the term of an Order of Appointment after notice and an opportunity for hearing. C. Timeframe. Performance of EEU implementers relative to specified Quantitative Performance Indicators (i.e., MW, MWh, market indicators, equity indicators, etc.) shall be assessed no less frequently than every three years in a process conducted by the PSB. This process shall be timed to inform the processes whereby the Board reviews the provide results in advance of the Overall Performance Assessment of the Appointed Entity and the End-of-Cycle Reconsideration of Appointment. D. Requirements and Process. i. Setting and Re-setting Quantifiable Performance Indicators and Values (a) Setting and re-setting QPIs for an EEU includes determining what indicators shall be measured, identifying minimum or target values for each indicator, the weighting assigned to each indicator and the scaling for target values. (b) The Board shall set the QPIs through a process that shall include one or more technical workshops and the opportunity for presentation of proposals to the Board. (c) The initial QPIs to be measured shall be those previously used to assess the EEUs. The Department shall propose any changes to such Quantifiable Performance Indicators in consultation with the EEUs and industry experts. (d) The values and weighting shall be proposed by the DPS and EEUs. (e) All interested parties may propose revisions to the list of indicators and the values proposed for QPIs. (f) Notice shall be provided so that any interested party may present additional proposals, recommendations, or responses to proposals made. ii. Evaluation & Incentive Award Determination (a) EEU implementers shall submit documentation to support claims of performance relative to QPIs. (b) The DPS shall review claims of performance relative to current-period QPIs and prepare a recommendation regarding their findings. (c) The DPS and the EEU shall seek to resolve any differences regarding the recommendations. (d) The DPS shall submit its recommendation to the PSB. (e) The EEU may offer comments on the recommendation to the PSB. (f) The Board shall then make a final determination of the extent to which QPIs have been met and the amount of any held-back compensation that should be provided to EEU Implementers. (g) The Board may conduct the processes detailed above concurrently. 4. Overall Performance Assessment A. Purpose. The Overall Performance Assessment will be conducted by the Board to determine if there are probable net-benefits from going to the market to consider offers from alternate implementation entities. B. Timeframe. The Overall Performance Assessment shall occur no less frequently than every six years. The process is expected to take approximately six months. C. Requirements and Process i. The Board shall conduct a public performance review process that will include: (a) Consideration of the record of the appointed entity in meeting three-year Quantitative Performance Indicators for the past two review cycles (b) Consideration of the relative benchmarks of entities conducting similar efficiency resource acquisition efforts in other jurisdictions, using appropriate indicators of relative performance (to be developed) (c) Notice to the public that the Board is conducting an Overall Performance Assessment of an EEU and soliciting comment from the public on an EEU’s performance (d) A review of trends in the overall efficiency of the appointed entity’s performance, considering the entity’s historical record using indicators such as overall yield (i.e., MWh/$ and MW/$) (e) Consideration of any other market information that may be useful in comparing the appointed entity’s performance to what might be available from an alternate entity, for example, bids made for comparable resources in the ISO-NE Forward Capacity Market ii. The Board shall provide the EEUs, the DPS, Vermont Utilities, other stakeholders, and any other person or entity which qualifies for intervention under Board Rule 2.209, an opportunity to submit comments and participate in a technical workshop on this performance review. iii. The Board shall issue a finding regarding whether it has found cause to go to the market to solicit proposals from alternate entities. iv. If the Board determines a proposal solicitation process is needed, it shall commence a process that would result in a new Appointment. v. The Board may use RPQs, RFPs or similar mechanisms to more definitively ascertain whether an alternate entity would better meet EEU objectives. vi. Poor performance relative to minimum requirements serves as a presumptive basis for initiating the process of ”Overall Performance Assessment” earlier than it would otherwise be scheduled to take place. 5. End-of-Cycle Reconsideration of Appointment A. Purpose. After a certain period of time, if it has not been triggered by other events, the Board will presumptively go to the market to determine whether an alternate EEU entity might provide greater net-benefits to Vermont ratepayers relative to a currently-appointed EEU. B. Timeframe i. On a twelve-year cycle, the Board shall conduct a process that goes to the market to consider competitive offers from potential alternate entities to be appointed as an EEU implementation entity. ii. This process would be expected to take as much as one year and shall be commenced no later than two years before the end of a three-year QPI period. C. Requirements and Process i. The Board shall initiate this process. ii. The process may be a simple competitive solicitation (like the current contract re-bid RFP process) or a staged process that would begin with a request for expressions of interest or request for qualifications iii. The Board shall retain the option to defer the implementation of a competitive solicitation if it finds, after notice and opportunity for comment and through application of established criteria (to be determined), that the benefits in performance likely to result from the process are not worth the cost of going to the market at the specified time iv. The Board shall provide the EEU, the DPS, Vermont Utilities, other stakeholders, and any other person or entity which qualifies for intervention under Board Rule 2.209, an opportunity to submit comments and participate in one or more technical workshops regarding this performance review. 6. Independent Third Party Audit In accordance with 30 V.S.A. 209(e)(12), the Board shall require verification by an independent auditor of the reported energy and capacity savings and costeffectiveness of programs delivered by EEU implementers. This audit shall be completed every three years as proscribed by statute. 7. Ongoing Opportunity to Consider Appointment At any point in the cycle of Appointment outlined above, the DPS, or any other party, may request that the Board initiate a review of an EEU Appointment for cause that shall be stated in the request. Such a review would be equivalent to an Overall Performance Review or the End of Cycle Reconsideration, but occur sooner than the default six and twelve-year cycles. The Board shall review such requests and determine whether to initiate a review process. 8. Interaction with Long-Range Transmission Plan Under the Board’s Order in Docket 7081, an EEU is assigned responsibilities for developing a long-term (twenty-year) forecast of the capacity reductions that will occur from system-wide efficiency efforts conducted by an EEU, both at the statewide level and in designated T&D areas specified by the VSPC. The scheduling of EEU planning, evaluation and performance-review cycles is intended to inform the fulfillment of this obligation in a timely manner. Part III. Initial Appointment and Transition This section addresses one-time issues associated with initial Appointment and transition to the new EEU structure. It is expected that the Board would open a contested-case proceeding to make the initial appointment and address the transition details exercising its authority under 30 V.S.A. § 209(d)(2). 1. Initial Selection of Entities The Parties agree that the Board should issue an order under 30 V.S.A. §209(d)(2) appointing VEIC and BED to serve as EEUs until such time as the Board selects any other entities through the review and reconsideration of Appointment processes described in this document. Said orders shall establish VEIC’s continuing authorization to the use of the name Efficiency Vermont in its provision of EEU services. The Board may, or may not, choose to conduct a review similar to the Overall Performance Assessment as described above in Section II. 3.prior to the initial appointment. 2. Transition Time Line – In order to move to a regular cycle of new processes that synchronizes with other utility planning dates (e.g., the Long-Range Transmission Plan), some transition planning and performance periods are shorter than they will be once the transition is complete. A chart on the following page summarizes key milestones in the transition plan. 3. Transition Process A. Extend the current Contract (as Backstop) - Under the current EVT contract, the Board is required to notify the contractor (VEIC), by June 30, 2008, of the Board’s decision as to whether it will exercise the option to extend the contract at the end of 2008. Because the recommended change in the EEU structure may not be fully resolved by that date, the Board would need to provide a backstop regarding timing of the transition to a new structure. The Board would notify the contractor of the intent to extend the contract for the next three-year term, with the provision that this could be superceded by a Board Order of Appointment. Based on the assumption that the Board intends to alter the structure, there would be no changes in scope or budget with the contract extension. Goals and performance indicators would reflect a level of activity consistent with 2008 levels. Transition Time Line 2008 Notice of EVT Contract Extension (backstop) Contested Case Proceeding to Finalize Structure and Details of Appointment (Docket Remains Open) Board Order of Appointment, Including Budget & Goals and Performance Indicators for 2009 (same as 2008) Verified Results from 2007 Available Verified Results from 2008 Available Set Transition Period Quantifiable Performance Indicators (2009, same as 2008) Transition Performance Period First Efficiency Resource Plan Proceeding to Set 20-Year Budgets and Goals Board Order on First 20-Year Efficiency Resource Plan and Set Performance Indicators for First Performance Period First Regular Performance Period Verified Results from 2009 Available Verified Results from 2010 Available Second Efficiency Resource Plan Proceeding to Set 20-Year Budgets and Goals Board Order on Second 20-Year Efficiency Resource Plan and Set Performance Indicators for Second Performance Period Second Regular Performance Period Verified Results from 2011 Available Verified Results from 2012 Available Verified Results from 2013 Available Third Efficiency Resource Plan Proceeding to Set 20-Year Budgets and Goals Board Order on Third 20-Year Efficiency Resource Plan and Set Performance Indicators for Second Performance Period 6-Year "Overall Performance Assessment" 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 B. Contested Case Proceeding on New Structure - The Board would convene a contested case proceeding to finalize the details of the new EEU structure. The conclusion of the proceeding would be the issuance of an Order of Appointment. C. Interim Goals, Budgets and Performance Indicators - The period between the end of 2008 and the start of the first QPI three-year performance period would be treated as a transition period. Under either a contract extension or the initial Order of Appointment, the budget, goals and performance indicators for this transition period would be set to be equivalent to the 2008 values under the current contract. 4. First Efficiency Resource Plan Proceeding - Following the issuance of an Order of Appointment, the Board would convene the first proceeding to adopt year-by-year EEU goals and budgets for the next twenty years (2010-2029). The same proceeding would address the choice and setting of Quantifiable Performance Indicators for the first regular three-year performance period (assumed to be 2010-2012). This process would culminate in a Board order for a three-year performance period, beginning no sooner than the first day of the seventh month after the order date or at the beginning of the next calendar year, whichever occurs later. 5. Further Transition Details The transition from a contract to an appointment would entail review of numerous administrative details in order to build upon existing systems and avoid unintended negative consequences. We recommend forming a working group composed of representatives of the Board, DPS and EEUs to consider the administrative details of the appointment and the transition period. This group would propose draft language regarding administrative elements for consideration by the ongoing Working Group and the Board. Part IV. Summary of Roles and Responsibilities This section summarizes the roles and responsibilities of various parties, organized by party. 1. Board A. Regulatory Responsibilities i. Issue Order of Appointment to one or more EEUs ii. Determine long-term demand-side resource acquisition goals and associates investment budgets for EEUs iii. Set EEC required to support EEU investment budgets iv. Set Quantifiable Performance Indicators for measuring EEU performance including Minimum Requirements v. Approve Monitoring and Verification Plans of EEUs vi. Determine whether Quantifiable Performance Indicators have been met vii. Award payment of any hold-back compensation to EEUs viii. Review Annual Plans and Annual Reports of EEUs ix. Conduct periodic Overall Performance Assessment of EEUs x. Conduct periodic Reconsideration of Appointment of EEUs xi. Determine whether to revoke or terminate any EEU Order of Appointment B. Administrative Responsibilities i. Manage contract with Fiscal Agent ii. Engage independent auditor to provide report to Legislature as required by 30 V.S.A. § 209(e)(12) iii. Review EEU invoices to the Fiscal Agent [?] C. EEU Facilitator – The Board may contract with an individual or company to serve as an EEU Facilitator to assist the Board in carrying out the above roles and responsibilities. [The intent of this provision is to provide the Board such administrative support as it may require to continue the completion of the functions carried out under the current contract model by the Contract Administrator]. 2. EEUs A. Operational Responsibilities i. Acquire maximum cost-effective demand-side resources on behalf of Vermont ratepayers and their utilities ii. Provide support for DUP and transmission planning processes including participation in the VSPC iii. Implement targeted acquisition of demand-side resources as part of both statewide resource acquisition plans and as part of the implementation of areaspecific DUP resource acquisition plans. iv. Participate, on behalf of Vermont ratepayers, in the ISO New England Forward Capacity Market v. Conduct the implementation tracking, saving measurement activities and process evaluations that are appropriate and useful for evaluating EEU performance vi. Provide such data and reports as are required of the EEU including any support for utility planning and ratemaking vii. Development, maintenance and monitoring of its own management and operational systems. viii. Provide transition assistance in the event of a termination or revocation of an appointment B. Regulatory Process Responsibilities i. Propose long-term demand-side resource acquisition goals and associated investment budgets ii. Propose Quantifiable Performance Indicators iii. Submit documentation to support claims of performance relative to QPIs iv. Collaborate with DPS to expand and update the EEU Technical Reference Manual as appropriate v. Participate in the Vermont System Planning Committee vi. Participate in regulatory proceedings that affect, or are affected by, EEU demand-side resource acquisition activities 3. DPS A. Planning Responsibilities i. Propose long-term demand-side resource acquisition goals and associated investment budgets for EEUs ii. Propose Quantifiable Performance Indicators iii. Propose Avoided Costs to be used in demand-side resource acquisition activities B. Evaluation Responsibilities i. Review claims of performance and make recommendations to the Board about incentive compensation ii. Collaborate with EEUs to expand and update EEU Technical Reference Manual iii. Conduct market characterization and baseline studies iv. Conduct annual savings verification v. Conduct impact evaluations 4. Distribution Utilities A. Collect EEC as per PSB Rule 5.300 B. Participate on EEU Advisory Committee C. Participate in the VSPC D. Coordinate with EEUs in connection with Demand Response E. [more?] Part _V. Administration An EEU is responsible for the maintenance, ongoing development and monitoring of its own management and operational systems, including: (1) general project management; (2) budgeting; (3) financial management; (4) contract management; (5) customer dispute resolution; and (6) information technology system management and data collection. An EEU shall maintain and enhance as it deems appropriate a management reporting system that enables its management to ensure proper control over its operational activities and strategic direction and facilitates the preparation of required reports and evaluation of its performance as an EEU. It shall be the goal, when interpreting any Order of Appointment, that an EEU identified in such an Order would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Board to the same extent as a “company” defined under 30 V.S.A. § 201 pursuant to the following sections of Title 30: i. § 18 - Production and examination of books; subpoena of witnesses ii. § 19 - Board’s ability to hire experts iii. § 20 - DPS and Board ability to hire experts iv. § 21 - Bill-back statute v. § 30 - Penalties for not providing access to records or violating statutes or board orders vi. § 31 - Ability to take depositions vii. § 32 - Ability to use injunctions viii. § 203 - Jurisdiction of the PSB and DPS and examination of plant, equipment ix. § 205 - Duty to furnish copies of contracts x. § 206 - Information to be furnished the DPS xi. § 207 - Reports of accidents; investigations xii. § 208 - Complaints; investigations; procedures xiii. § 209 - The Board’s Jurisdiction; general scope xiv. § 219 - Non-discrimination xv. § 221 - Forms of books, accounts, records; Board orders Part _VI. Compensation, Revocation and Termination For the entire term of the Appointment, an EEU shall coordinate its activities and the fulfillment of the responsibilities of its Appointment with the Fiscal Agent, the DPS and other entities that may be specified by the Board. 1. Compensation. In consideration of the fulfillment of the responsibilities of Appointment, the Board shall authorize EEU to receive payments in accordance with the payment provisions detailed below. A. The maximum amount payable to EEU shall be the amount of EEU EEC Funds established by the Board. This maximum amount is inclusive of all eligible costs, expenses and all earned performance incentives. B. Two types of compensation shall be provided to an EEU: (i) Cost-of-Service Compensation and (ii) Resource Acquisition Compensation. Both types of compensation shall be provided from EEU EEC Funds, but the basis of compensation is different for each. i. Cost-of-Service Compensation (a) Cost-of-Service Compensation shall be provided to an EEU for certain Eligible Services and Initiatives specifically designated in the Order of Appointment, and any subsequent modifications made by the Board. (b) When the Board establishes year-by-year EEU budgets through adoption of Efficiency Resource Plans, a portion of the total EEU budget will be set for Cost-of-Service Compensation. (c) The budget for Cost-of-Service Compensation shall be a not-to-exceed amount covering the three years after the budget is established. (d) The three-year, not-to-exceed budget for Cost-of-Service Compensation may be modified for certain causes beyond an EEU’s control… [note: need more here about how this would work] (e) An EEUs Cost-of-Service Compensation shall compensate an EEU for reasonable actual costs incurred providing the Board-designated Eligible Services and Initiatives, plus, where appropriate, the current operations fee with the percentage to be set and/or changed by the Board, plus any earned performance-based payments as described further in section xxx. (f) Eligible Services and Initiatives shall be specifically defined [note: definitions to be provided here? Or in another section? Or later?], and shall include: (i) Technical assistance and educational support for energy code activities as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found.. (ii) Contribution and support to DPS potential studies, forecasts and plans as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found.. (iii)Support for DPS Evaluation activities as further described in Part II section Error! Reference source not found... (iv) DUP and transmission planning activities as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found.. (v) VSPC participation as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found.. (vi) ISO-NE Forward Capacity Market participation as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found. (vii) Applied R&D activities as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found. (viii) Training and workforce development activities as further described in Part I section Error! Reference source not found. (ix) Energy education activities as further described in section Error! Reference source not found. ii. Resource Acquisition Compensation (a) Resource Acquisition Compensation shall be provided to an EEU for services and initiatives that acquire demand-side resources specified in Efficiency Resource Plans (e.g., MW, MWh, TRB). (b) When the Board establishes year-by-year EEU budgets through adoption of Efficiency Resource Plans, a portion of the total EEU budget will be set for Resource Acquisition Compensation which is equal to annual EEU EEC Funds less the portion set aside for performance-based payments, less the annual budgets Cost-of-Service Compensation. (c) From the funds available for Resource Acquisition Compensation, an EEU shall be provided Resource Acquisition Compensation for EEU’s actual costs incurred to secure resource acquisition, plus an operations fee of xx%, plus payment for any earned performance incentives. C. Of the total budget for the three-year period following establishment of the budget, a percentage specified by the Board shall be held back and set aside for performance-based payments that may be earned only by an EEU’s attainment of Quantifiable Performance Indicators, as described in Part II, section 3 D. The award and amount of performance-based incentives to an EEU shall be determined by the Board based upon: i. The EEU meeting Minimum Performance Requirements, as further described in Part II, section 3.B and 3.D.ii; and ii. The degree to which the EEU has met Scaled Performance Indicators as described in Part II, section 3.D.ii. E. Eligible Costs and Expenses i. Subject to the limitations of the budget, as described above, an EEU shall be compensated for reasonable and appropriate labor and expenses incurred in fulfilling the responsibilities of the Appointment. Compensation for such services and expenses shall be based on an EEU’s actual costs incurred. ii. An EEU’s actual costs shall include: wages or salaries of staff working directly to fulfill the responsibilities of the Appointment; fringe-benefit and payroll-related costs associated with such wages and salaries; an equitable allocated share of the An EEU’s organization-wide indirect costs; any and all out-of-pocket costs (e.g., telecommunications, travel, copying/printing, postage/delivery, marketing, equipment) directly attributable to performing the responsibilities of the Appointment; mileage reimbursement at the Internal Revenue Service-approved rate only for use of a personal motor vehicle; any and all costs to develop and produce Customized Software; any and all subcontractor costs directly attributable to fulfillment of the responsibilities of the Appointment; funds disbursed to program participants (e.g., financial incentives, cooperative marketing); and other reasonable and appropriate costs that the An EEU incurs to fulfill the responsibilities of the Appointment. An EEU shall use the guidelines established by the Federal Government for Federal cost reimbursable grants, or other comparable standards agreed upon by the Board, as the basis for determining whether or not a particular direct or indirect cost item incurred under the Appointment is reasonable and appropriate. Such Federal guidelines are contained in OMB Circular A-122 dated May 10, 2004. iii. In addition to the above costs, an EEU shall also be reimbursed its actual cost as charged by a lending institution under the an EEU’s line of credit with that lending institution, to borrow funds to finance any eligible costs and expenses incurred and paid for by the an EEU prior to receiving its monthly payment from the Fiscal Agent or due to a shortfall in funds available from the Fiscal Agent. Failure of the Fiscal Agent to pay an approved EEU invoice on a timely basis due to the lack of available funds shall not constitute an acceptable basis on which an EEU may terminate an Appointment; however, a material failure of this type may (if of such magnitude and duration as to impede or prevent expected operations) constitute grounds for modification or reduction of an EEU’s obligations under the Appointment (but only to the extent directly required by such delay or failure of payment). iv. An EEU shall operate in accordance with the guidelines detailed in OMB Circular A-122, or other comparable standards agreed upon by the Board. The Board an EEU shall come to agreement on the following items: (a) The types of costs that constitute an EEU’s fringe-benefit and payrollrelated costs and an EEU’s organization-wide indirect costs; and (b) The method for allocating an equitable share of an EEU’s fringe-benefit and payroll-related costs and an EEU’s organization-wide indirect costs. (c) Any modifications to the above two items must be agreed upon in advance by the Board. v. Notwithstanding the above, all eligible costs, expenses and fees paid to an EEU are subject to the Total Compensation limitation detailed in Paragraph xx. F. Invoice Requirements i. An EEU shall submit monthly invoices of eligible costs and expenses for payment by the 25th day of the subsequent month, or the next business day if the 25th is not a business day. All invoices shall, at a minimum, include the name, address, and tax I.D. number of the EEU; an itemized summary identifying and describing the activities performed and expenses incurred; the amount claimed for each task or expense category; and the total amount of the invoice. Invoices shall clearly separate requests for compensation for labor expenses and other expenses including payments to contractors, and reimbursement for funds disbursed to EEU program participants. The form of the invoice shall be agreed upon by the EEU and the Board. G. Invoice Submission and Review i. An EEU shall submit invoices for review and payment by the Fiscal Agent, ii. Payment of Invoices (a) Unless instructed otherwise by the Board, disbursements by the Fiscal Agent will be made once each month; the Fiscal Agent will pay monthly invoices by the last business day of the following month. (b) The parties understand that the Fiscal Agent may not have collected adequate funds from the distribution utilities in a particular month to pay EEU invoices in full. In order to be made aware of these shortfalls, the Board will direct the Fiscal Agent to inform EEUs on a monthly basis of the total funds available to pay EEU invoices. The total funds available shall be the EEU EEC Funds collected to date. Any unpaid EEU invoices from prior months shall be paid first and then a partial payment shall be made on EEU’s current monthly invoices. All EEU invoices shall be paid in full, as funds become available. (c) At any termination or expiration of the Appointment, an EEU will most likely still be due payments for one or more monthly invoices and for any performance incentives earned pursuant to section xxx. In such a case, an EEU’s unpaid invoices shall be paid prior to any payments being made to any other new entity who has been Appointed as a replacement EEU. H. Carryover of Funds. An EEU may carry over unspent funds from one year to the next. The amount of any carryover funds shall be reflected in appropriate EEU reports, plans and budgets. I. Reliance by Board on Representations. All payments made under an Appointment will be made in reliance upon the accuracy of all prior representations by an EEU, including but not limited to bills, invoices, progress reports and other proofs of work. 2. Revocation or Termination of Appointment. A. Revocation For Cause i. In the event that an EEU materially breaches the terms of the Appointment, the Board may without prejudice to any of its other legal remedies revoke the Appointment upon (xx period of time) written notice to EEU and be relieved of the payment of any amount due to EEU for costs after the date of such revocation, except as provided in subparagraph “xx” below. Alternatively, the Board may, in its sole discretion, provide an EEU with time to cure any breach.. ii. In the event an Appointment is revoked for cause, the Board may proceed in any manner it deems proper. EEU shall be compensated for satisfactory services rendered and eligible costs and expenses as provided in subparagraph “xx” below; however, in its discretion, the Board may deduct from any sum due to EEU under the Appointment, all expense, damage or other harm incurred by the Board or its agents as a result of EEU’s failure to perform its obligation under the Appointment B. Revocation – Bankruptcy. In the event proceedings in bankruptcy are commenced against an appointed EEU, it is adjudged bankrupt, or a receiver is appointed, the Board may terminate the Appointment by giving (xx period of time) notice in writing to the EEU. C. Termination by Board to Appoint a Different Implementing Entity, or to Terminate Appointment of any EEU. As a result of the process outlined in Part 2, Sections 3, 4 or 6 the Board may terminate the Appointment of an EEU in order to appoint a different entity to act as an EEU. The Board may also terminate an Appointment if it chooses to no longer use an EEU to perform the functions identified in 30 V.S.A. §209(d). Any such termination shall be effective no sooner than 18 months after notice of the Board to the affected EEU of its determination to terminate the Appointment and subject to the conditions of termination below. D. Responsibility of Parties Upon Expiration or Revocation of Appointment i. An EEU shall provide reasonable transition assistance as requested by the Board to the Board and any entity designated by the Board to ensure that the functions of an EEU are continuously carried out without interruption. In such event, EEU agrees to use all reasonable efforts to mitigate its expenses and obligations hereunder. ii. In the case of Revocation by Board under sub-paragraphs 2.A and 2.B above, the EEU shall be compensated for all satisfactory services rendered and eligible costs and expenses prior to the notice of termination and until the end of the termination notice period. The EEU shall be paid for all reasonable services rendered and costs and expenses incurred by an EEU subsequent to revocation, but only for reasonable transition assistance which could not, by reasonable efforts of an EEU, have been avoided. iii. If this Appointment is terminated pursuant to subparagraph 2.C above, the EEU shall receive all performance incentives that are earned and verified as of the date of such termination. In addition, the Board agrees to work with an EEU to determine an appropriate performance incentive to be paid to an EEU based on actual results toward performance goals for the current performance period. iv. If this Appointment is terminated pursuant to subparagraph 2.C above, then the Board and the EEU shall negotiate in good faith to reimburse the EEU for costs incurred as a result of termination. Any obligation to reimburse an EEU for the above costs and performance incentives will be limited to available funds. v. All costs to be reimbursed to an EEU for either termination without good cause under subparagraph XX above or termination under subparagraph XX above shall not exceed any of the limits detailed above, shall be limited to the actual reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred by an EEU, and shall be determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles consistently applied. vi. All records and data related to Work performed under this Appointment in the possession of an EEU and its subcontractor(s) shall be made available and turned over to the Board or its designated representative upon the revocation or termination of an Appointment, at the Board's request. These transfers shall be accomplished within a reasonable amount of time after the dates of notification to an EEU to transfer the data and documents. However, an EEU and its subcontractor(s) must be provided with any records and data that it will need to undertake any transition assistance after these records and data have been turned over to the Board. E. Committed Incentive Payments. It is expected that, on the date of any termination of Appointment, an EEU will have outstanding contracts for customer incentive payments. The EEU shall be relieved of those obligations, and responsibility for them will be assigned to the new entity serving as an EEU. F. Other EEU Commitments. It is expected that, on the date of any termination of Appointment, an EEU will have outstanding commitments made as part of its responsibilities as an EEU, including, but not limited to loans, loan guarantees, partnership agreements and committed capacity in the ISO-NE FCM. An EEU shall be relieved of those obligations, and responsibility for them will be assigned to the new entity serving as an EEU. Part _VII. Definitions When capitalized and italicized, whether in the singular or plural, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings in constructing the Appointment. 1. Appointment means the appointment of an entity by the Board, as further described in 30 VSA §209 (d)(2), to act as an energy efficiency utility, carrying out the responsibilities established in an Order of Appointment under the terms and conditions set forth in the Order of Appointment, and any subsequent Orders of the PSB related to the appointment. 2. BED means the City of Burlington Electric Department. 3. Board or PSB means the Vermont Public Service Board identified in 30 V.S.A. § 3. 4. Customer Credit Net Pay Option Available Incentive Funds are the total funds available to customers who qualify under the Customer Credit program pursuant to Board Memorandum dated January 27, 2004. These are the EEC Funds that are rebated back to the qualifying customers and are not available as compensation to an EEU to perform the responsibilities of the Appointment. 5. Comprehensive energy efficiency program means a coordinated set of activities carried out by a regulated electric or gas utility or other entity as appointed by the Board pursuant to 30 V.S.A. §209(d) to meet the public’s need for energy services through efficiency, conservation or load management in all customer classes and areas of opportunity which is designed to acquire the full amount of cost effective savings from such investments or programs as contemplated under 30 V.S.A. §218c(a)(2). 6. Customized Software means any computer software that is not readily available for purchase and that is modified, developed, and/or written by an EEU or its subcontractor(s) specifically for the purpose of performing the responsibilities of the Appointment. 7. Department or DPS means the Vermont Department of Public Service. 8. DSM means demand side management. 9. Distribution Utilities or DUs means utilities providing retail electric service to Vermont customers in Vermont under the supervision of the Board. 10. DUP means distributed utility planning. 11. EEC means the Energy Efficiency Charge, which is the volumetric charge to retail customers of electric Distribution Utility customers for the support of demand-side resource acquisition pursuant to 30 V.S.A § 209(d)(3) and Board Rule 5.300 12. EEC Funds means all funds collected via the EEC. 13. EEU means an entity appointed by the Board to act as an EEU under §209 (d)(2). The term specifically includes BED so long as they have Board approval to selfadminister EEU responsibilities for their retail customers. 14. EEU EEC Funds means the portion of the EEC Funds that are available to an EEU to perform the responsibilities of the Appointment. For an entity other than BED, an EEU EEC Funds for a calendar year are comprised of the total EEC Funds approved for collection (not including any true-up from over/under collections of the EEC from prior years) by the Fiscal Agent for that calendar year plus carryover of unspent EEC Funds from prior calendar years less the following deductions: A. DPS EEU monitoring and evaluation costs; B. Fiscal Agent fees; C. Fiscal Agent audit fees; D. Customer Credit Net Pay Option Available Incentive Funds; E. EEC Funds collected from BED’s ratepayers that are for BED’s selfimplementation of EEU services within BED’s service territory, as ordered by the Board, including BED’s share of DPS EEU monitoring and evaluation costs, Fiscal Agent fees, Fiscal Agent audit fees; and F. Any other costs the PSB determines are required in order to effectively administer, monitor or evaluate an EEU. 15. EVT means Efficiency Vermont. 16. FCM means the ISO-New England Forward Capacity Market. 17. Fiscal Agent means the person or entity selected and retained by the Board to receive the EEC Funds from utility companies, those funds having been paid to utility companies by electricity consumers in Vermont for the provision of demand-side resource acquisition, and to disburse those funds under the direction of the Board. 18. IRP means integrated resource planning, including DUP and transmission planning, as contemplated pursuant to 30 V.S.A. § 218c. 19. Minimum Requirements means such minimum performance requirements as may be established by the Board at all times subject to the term of any Appointment, that apply to the activities and performance of an EEU for any category of service that is subject to an Appointment. 20. NTA means non-transmission alternative and includes Generation and/or demandside resource acquisition measures that may defer or avoid construction of transmission system facilities. 21. NTA Analysis means an analysis to identify cost-effective and viable NTAs to address a Reliability Deficiency that provide Equivalence, compare those alternatives to the likely transmission-only alternative(s) to address the deficiency, and evaluate which alternative is the best choice to address the deficiency. Such identification and analysis also shall include viable alternatives to address the deficiency that encompass both transmission and non-transmission element. 22. Parties mean the Department and those entities on behalf of which a signature appears at the end of this document. 23. QPIs means Quantifiable Performance Indicators. 24. Reliability Deficiency or Reliability Deficiencies means an existing or forecasted violation, pre- or post-contingency, of applicable bulk transmission system or subsystem design or operating criteria, with consideration given to the reliability and availability of individual system elements. 25. State means the State of Vermont. 26. System-wide Programs means the DSM programs being delivered under the EEU structure pursuant to the Board’s regular budget-setting cycle under 30 V.S.A. § 209(d), and does not include any additional DSM offered or required to be offered under DUP or as part of an NTA to address a supply problem or Reliability Deficiency. 27. T&D means transmission and distribution 28. VEIC shall mean the Vermont Energy Investment Corporation. 29. VELCO means Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc. and Vermont Transco LLC. 30. Vermont Utility or Vermont Utilities includes VELCO and the DUs. 31. V.S.A. means the Vermont Statutes Annotated. 32. VSPC means the Vermont System Planning Committee.