Rev 5 – Preliminary
SLAC HEP Budget Meeting
Summary Discussion Charts
S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Alva
SLAC
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 1
Outline of Presentation
* Statement of SLAC PPA Vision and Near-Term Priorities for
Operating Programs, and New Projects.
– Addresses Laboratory role, strengths and strategic goals and program
objectives.
* Scenario A, (B, C)
–
–
–
–
B&R Reallocation Summary Sheet
High Level Summary
2009-2011 Detailed year-by-year breakouts
Summary Budget Spreadsheet
* Backup Material on Individual Programs
– ATLAS, EXO-200 and EXO, LSST, JDEM, SuperB, Theory, Accelerator
Development, ILC SRF, PEP-II D&D, Detector R&D Test Beam.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 2
SLAC Vision for Particle Physics and Astrophysics
*
Maintain a leading role at the Energy Frontier through enhanced
participation in ATLAS, the current LHC machine, and their planned
upgrades, and through leadership of R&D for the ILC and associated
detector concepts.
*
Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for particle
astrophysics and cosmology, and for non-accelerator physics generally.
(KIPAC, FGST, LSST, JDEM, EXO, GeODM, AGIS, CMB).
*
Maintain strong partnerships at the Intensity Frontier through facilitating US
participation in an international SuperB Project, and through supporting the
design and development of the Project X facility.
*
Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for electron
accelerator research. Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics
across disciplines within the Office of Science. Develop key innovations
and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 3
SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and
Astrophysics: Operating Programs
*
Continue to facilitate the optimal exploitation and preservation of the BaBar dataset.
–
–
*
Support necessary computing infrastructure through the completion of the intense and
steady analysis phases
Facilitate transition into the archival phase, and ensure that the BaBar data remain
accessible to a broad community.
Operate the LAT for FGST, and continue to spearhead scientific discovery with this
unique particle astrophysics observatory.
–
–
Support the operations, software development, and instrument support functions of the LAT,
as performed by the ISOC.
Maintain a vigorous LAT-based scientific analysis program at SLAC.
*
Play a significant role in ATLAS and LHC accelerator commissioning, initial science
analyses, and computing support.
*
Maintain world-leading accelerator-science program
–
World-leading programs in beam physics theory, advanced computation, and accelerator
design.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 4
SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and
Astrophysics: Operating Programs
*
Maintain a crucial, enabling role in technology development for the ILC.
–
–
–
*
L-band rf.
Electron source.
Final focus and IR design.
Lead high-gradient X-band research in the US.
–
Establish the fundamental limits to acceleration gradient and the optimal design of rf
structures.
*
Maintain world-leading theoretical programs in particle physics and particle
astrophysics and cosmology.
*
Plan and execute the orderly D&D of the BaBar detector and the PEP-II facility.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 5
SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and
Astrophysics: New Programs
*
Bring LSST into development as a joint NSF-DOE project.
–
–
–
*
Lead the design and development of the LSST camera.
Participate in the data management, with particular emphasis on new tools for handling and
querying the extremely large database.
Shepherd the involvement of the HEP community in this exciting dark energy experiment.
Play a major role in the upgrade of the ATLAS detector and the LHC
–
–
–
–
ATLAS Phase 1: Insertable B-layer project.
ATLAS Phase 2: Tracker and TDAQ upgrades.
Enhancement of ATLAS computing at SLAC.
Extend LHC contributions to include fabrication of upgrade collimators, development of PS2
design, and LLRF and feedback improvements.
*
Construct and operate FACET for forefront experiments in beam-driven plasma
wakefield acceleration.
*
Participate in JDEM construction, development, and science analyses.
–
–
–
Provision of warm electronics for one or more of the focal plane instruments.
Possible role in fine guiding.
Participation in weak lensing and strong lensing science investigations.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 6
SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and
Astrophysics: New Programs
*
Develop and construct a ton-scale version of EXO for the initial suite of mid-scale
experiments at DUSEL.
–
–
*
Complete operation and testing of EXO-200.
Perform the necessary R&D and engineering for full-EXO.
Facilitate a significant US role in SuperB in Italy.
–
–
–
Provide components from PEP-II to reduce the cost of SuperB construction.
Play a leadership role in the machine design and construction.
Develop and coordinate participation in the SuperB detector collaboration.
*
Participate in Project-X R&D with contributions to rf power systems.
*
Perform state of the art experiments in laser dielectric acceleration.
*
Develop high power X-band rf sources to optimally exploit high gradient structures.
*
Initiate and maintain R&D efforts to a enable a SLAC leadership role in longer-range
programs:
–
SiD, GeODM, and AGIS
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 7
SLAC HEP Budget Meeting Update
Modified Scenarios B and C
S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Alva
SLAC
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 8
Modified Scenario B
Description
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod.
FY 2010
FY 2011
2009 -2015
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 61,181
$ 62,780
$
64,665
$
66,605
$
68,604
$
70,663
$
72,782
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 12,907
$ 11,034
$
10,010
$
9,496
$
9,330
$
9,330
$
9,330
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 21,464
$ 17,312
$
24,248
$
25,675
$
31,113
$
44,566
$
34,032
SLAC Total
$
103,427
$ 95,552
$ 91,126
$
98,923
$
101,776
$
109,047
$
124,559
$
116,144
366
349
345
SLAC FTEs*
341
347
353
353
353
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High Level Impacts
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Maintains present core research staffing levels with no need for reductions through attrition.
BABAR D&D as planned; PEP-II D&D delayed until 2012.
LSST ramp-up, assume $1.5 M (FY10) and $3M (FY12) of PED funding.
EXO concept only developed at the 200 kg level.
Reduced electron research program due to BABAR falloff; reduced SuperB involvement, & small
ongoing ILC detector R&D studies.
Continue growth of ATLAS, leading to SLAC role on ATLAS Phase 1 IBL and TDAQ ATLAS upgrades
with BNL as lead; continue effort on LHC accelerator commissioning and upgrades.
Accelerator science program as planned.
Develop test beam and X-band rf source proposals for future funding consideration.
Project X & JDEM warm electronics role commensurate with additional funding from lead labs and/or
other agencies.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 9
Modified Scenario B
*
Strategic Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
–
–
–
–
*
Maintain leadership in current electron accelerator physics, but future direction in doubt without
clear path for SuperB and ILC physics programs.
Establish SLAC as the lead laboratory in particle astrophysics and cosmology for DOE-SC,
although prospects for development of future underground program unclear.
Continue leadership role at the Energy Frontier through an enhanced role in ATLAS and
ongoing development of the ILC.
Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics across disciplines within the Office of Science.
Develop key innovations and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators.
What major accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
–
–
–
–
–
*
2009 -2015
BABAR Intensive and Steady analysis supported.
FGST support and science exploitation.
LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project.
Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including upgrade contribution.
FACET implementation and development of acc science novel concepts.
Significant issues and concerns
–
–
–
No provision for full EXO as part of initial suite of DUSEL experiments.
No provision for US contribution to SuperB if project proceeds on projected timescale.
No provision for industrialization of SC RF 1.3 GHz sources.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 10
Modified Scenario B
Description
Delta
FY09-FY08
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod. CR
% Change
$ 61,181
1%
Core Programs
$
60,865
$
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$
14,896
SLAC Total
$
103,427
$
(7,875) $ 95,552
SLAC FTEs*
366
316
2009
(23,087) $ 12,907
$ 21,464
(17)
349
-64%
227%
-8%
-5%
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High level impacts
– No further attrition in core staff. ATLAS growth continues, electron reduced and
reduced Super B involvement; some attrition in Theory.
*
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
– As previously noted.
*
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
– In addition to previously noted, LSST CD-1, R&D for full EXO and SuperB concept
development.
– FACET starts construction and acc science ramps-up according to plan.
– JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding.
*
Significant issues and concerns
– Accelerated FACET construction funded from stimulus package will be challenging.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 11
Modified Scenario B
Description
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod. CR
Delta
FY10-FY09
FY 2010
% Change
$ 62,780
3%
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 61,181
$
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 12,907
$
(1,873) $ 11,034
-15%
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 21,464
$
(4,152) $ 17,312
-19%
SLAC Total
$ 103,427
$ 95,552
$
(4,426) $ 91,126
-5%
366
349
SLAC FTEs*
1,599
2010
(4)
345
-1%
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High level impacts
–
–
–
*
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
–
*
As previously noted.
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
–
–
–
–
–
*
Reduction of 4 FTEs in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D continues as planned, but not yet able to start of
PEP-II D&D
Project line: LSST ramp-up assumes ~$1.5 M of PED funding in 2010, with FACET construction ending.
PED funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead.
BABAR Intensive analysis winds down and transitions to Steady analysis.
ATLAS IBL design effort achieves CD-1.
LSST proceeds to CD-2.
Finish FACET construction, ramp-up PWFA and laser accelerator science as planned.
JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding.
Significant issues and concerns
–
Briefing
with OHEP among
Staff: March
3, 2009 projects.
Page 12
Some competition forBudget
people
and resources
construction
Modified Scenario B
Description
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod. CR
FY 2010
Delta
FY11-FY10
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 61,181
$ 62,780
$
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 12,907
$ 11,034
$
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 21,464
$ 17,312
$
6,936
SLAC Total
$ 103,427
$ 95,552
$ 91,126
$
7,797
366
349
345
SLAC FTEs*
2011
1,884
FY 2011
% Change
$
64,665
3%
(1,023) $
10,010
-9%
$
24,248
40%
$
98,923
9%
341
-1%
(4)
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High level impacts
–
–
–
–
*
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
–
–
*
As previously noted.
Moving ATLAS phase 1 upgrade and LSST projects through CD reviews into the construction phase.
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
–
–
*
Another 4 FTE reduction in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D and PEP-II maintenance at ~$6.5M, but
resources are insufficient to start PEP-II D&D until 2012.
Project line increases by ~$7M due to: LSST ramp-up (assuming $3M of PED funding for FY2011), the
first fulll year of FACET operations, and an additional $1M investment to replace aging KIPAC
computing equipment.
Construction funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead.
Continue planned Accelerator Science growth.
As previously noted.
BABAR Steady analysis ongoing.
Significant issues and concerns
–
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Phasing of new initiative development schedules.
Page 13
B&R
KA1202011
KA1202011
KA1202012
KA1202012
KA120201
Description
Accelerator Operations: PEPII MMS
Accelerator Operations: PEP II D&D
Detector Operations
Babar D&D
B-factory Operations Total
Control
KA120102
KA130102
KA140102
KA150102
KA150102
KA1502011
KA150302
FY 2010
Modified
1,970
583
3,226
4,374
10,153
FY 2011
2,030
600
2,872
4,428
9,930
35,994
0
35994
39
12,907
-4,009
16,916
35
11,034
(3,386)
14,420
25
6,254
35
7,178
92
22,669
40
7,725
43,825
8,610
ST B Factory
B-factory Complex Total
KA110102
24,144
FY 2009
Modified
1,913
566
3,867
4,181
10,527
FY 2008
15,534
Core Research
FTEs
Proton Research ops
FTEs
Electron Research ops
FTEs
Non-Accelerator Research ops
FTEs
Theoretical Research ops
Core EPP Research
3,200
8,899
15,757
7,300
35,156
Core Technologies R&D
FTEs
National Lab Accel Science
National Lab Accel Science EQU
FTEs
General Accel Development
FTEs
National Lab Detector Development
Core Technologies R&D
9,201
11,232
5,276
25,709
FTEs ST
KA1102054
KA1102053
KA1502021
KA120103
KA130102
KA140103
KA140104
9,250
9,250
31
10,010
730
9,280
37
9,496
246
9,250
43
9,330
80
9,250
43
9,330
80
9,250
43
9,330
80
9,250
30
7,419
30
6,389
92
23,349
39
7,756
44,913
35
8,717
25
5,506
92
24,049
38
7,789
46,061
40
10,079
20
4,571
92
24,771
37
7,823
47,243
44
11,301
16
3,788
92
25,514
37
8,058
48,661
44
11,640
16
3,902
92
26,279
37
8,300
50,121
44
11,989
16
4,019
92
27,067
37
8,549
51,625
40
9,802
300
18
4,052
13
3,203
17,356
41
10,096
300
18
4,173
13
3,299
17,868
42
10,599
309
18
4,298
13
3,398
18,604
43
11,117
318
18
4,427
13
3,500
19,362
43
11,450
328
18
4,560
13
3,605
19,943
43
11,794
338
18
4,697
13
3,713
20,542
43
12,147
348
18
4,838
13
3,824
21,157
263
263
263
263
263
263
263
0
0
8,000
0
8,000
LHC R&D Program
ATLAS Operations
LHC Support (LARP)
LHC R&D Program Total
FTEs
668
1,405
2,073
ILC R&D
Lab ILC Accel R&D
ILC R&D Total
FTEs
Other
University Service Accounts
National Lab Research EQU
Lab SciDAC Research
Theory Other
Other Total
FTEs
Projects/LHC/ILC/Other
FTEs: w/o Research Projects or SciDAC
SLAC HEP Total
FTEs: SLAC HEP Total w/o R Projects & SciDAC
62,780
5,311
57,469
9,250
66,605
5,636
60,969
68,604
5,806
62,798
70,663
5,981
64,682
72,782
6,160
66,622
2,000
3,446
3,000
6,000
9,000
5,000
6,000
11,000
10,000
6,000
16,000
23,000
6,000
29,000
12,000
6,000
18,000
622
1,467
2,089
6
641
1,511
2,152
6
660
1,556
2,216
6
680
1,603
2,283
6
700
1,651
2,351
6
721
1,701
2,422
6
743
1,752
2,495
6
3,670
3,670
11,300
11,300
41
11,639
11,639
41
11,988
11,988
41
12,348
12,348
41
12,718
12,718
41
13,100
13,100
41
13,493
13,493
41
69
31
-
-
-
-
1,446
-
44
75
0
1,000
44
1,044
0
21,464
47
17,312
47
95,552
349
91,126
345
702
54
825
0
44
75
0
6,568
103,427
31
64,665
5,472
59,193
9,250
FY 2015
9,250
0
0
0
0
0
LSST MIE
EXO R&D
FACET: MIE
FACET: Ops
Research Projects Total
FY 2014
9,250
61,181
5,386
55,795
Control
KA1301032
KA1301032
KA1501041
KA1501041
SLAC
FY 2013
5,000
1,500
2,916
9,416
60,865
0
60,865
Core Programs
FY 2012
-
44
44
0
44
44
0
44
44
0
44
44
0
24,248
47
25,675
47
31,113
47
44,566
47
34,032
47
98,923
341
101,776
347
109,047
353
124,559
353
116,144
353
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Modified Scenario B
detail
Page 14
Modified Scenario C
Description
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod. PB
FY 2010
FY 2011
FY 2012
2009 -2015
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 62,740
$
64,571
$
66,494
$
68,488
$
70,544
$
72,661
$
74,841
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 14,169
$
15,480
$
16,030
$
13,046
$
9,330
$
9,330
$
9,330
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 22,624
$
24,910
$
38,178
$
49,255
$
62,507
$
84,873
$
70,672
SLAC Total
$ 103,427
$ 99,533
$ 104,961
$ 120,701
$ 130,789
$ 142,381
$ 166,864
$ 154,843
366
360
383
394
384
372
372
372
SLAC FTEs*
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High Level Impacts
–
Expands Scenario B to include full-scale EXO and significant US role in SuperB.
•
•
–
–
–
Begin full EXO in FY2013, as part of the initial suite of experiments at DUSEL, with PED in FY2011-2012,
construction start in FY2013 and SLAC as lead.
Begin SuperB as a new construction project starting in FY2012, with PED in 2011, assuming investment in detector
and accelerator by US community with SLAC as lead.
Exploit core data management capability developed for BABAR to enable enhanced ATLAS Analysis
Facility.
Assume funding to construct test beam for detector R&D program (2009 and 2010),
Assume successful competition for accelerator development funding
•
•
X-band rf sources, $9M over 5 years to develop viable rf source.
TT60 High Radiation Test Facility, $1M to provide beam dump and window by end of CY2010.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 15
Modified Scenario C
*
2009 -2015
Strategic Priorities: What Scientific objectives and targets are being
addressed?
– A program at this level is commensurate with the full vision we articulated for
PPA at SLAC.
*
What Major accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
– Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including major upgrade contribution.
– BABAR Intensive and Steady State analysis supported; D&D completed in a
timely way.
– SLAC and US community provide crucial leadership for SuperB project in Italy,
with BABAR and PEP-II components and major new hardware contributions.
– FGST support and science exploitation.
– LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project.
– FACET implementation and development of Acc Science novel concepts.
– Full EXO developed as a major component of the initial program at DUSEL.
*
Significant issues and concerns:
– Phasing of various construction remains a significant challenge.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 16
Modified Scenario C
Description
*
% Change
$ 62,740
3%
$
60,865
$
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$
16,056
SLAC Total
$
103,427
$
(3,894) $ 99,533
366
1,875
FY 2009
Mod. PB
Core Programs
SLAC FTEs*
Scenario B +
Delta
FY09-FY08
FY 2008
2009
(21,825) $ 14,169
$ 22,624
(6)
360
-61%
244%
-4%
-2%
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
High level impacts
– Expand the scope of FACET to include the double sail boat configuration.
– Initial $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal
*
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
– Continue development of full EXO and SuperB for consideration in later years.
*
*
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
– FACET construction accelerated.
– Test beam design completed and construction started.
Significant issues and concerns
– FACET cost estimates yet to be baselined and confirmed.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 17
Modified Scenario C
Description
Scenario B +
FY 2008
FY 2009
Mod. PB
Delta
FY10-FY09
2010
FY 2010
% Change
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 62,740
$
1,830
$
64,571
3%
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 14,169
$
1,311
$
15,480
9%
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 22,624
$
2,286
$
24,910
10%
SLAC Total
$ 103,427
$ 99,533
$
5,428
$
104,961
5%
366
360
383
6%
SLAC FTEs*
23
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
*
High level impacts
– Remaining $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal
*
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
– Moving full EXO R&D forward and continuing to develop US role on SuperB.
*
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
– Complete test beam and begin operations.
– Begin new accelerator development projects.
*
Significant issues and concerns
– Potential competition for resources as multiple construction projects ramp-up.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 18
Modified Scenario C
Description
Scenario B +
*
–
–
Delta
FY11-FY10
FY 2011
% Change
Core Programs
$
60,865
$ 62,740
$
64,571
$
1,923
$
66,494
3%
B Factory Ops/D & D
$
35,994
$ 14,169
$
15,480
$
550
$
16,030
4%
Projects /LHC /ILC/Other
$
6,568
$ 22,624
$
24,910
$ 13,267
$
38,178
53%
SLAC Total
$ 103,427
$ 99,533
$
104,961
$ 15,740
$
120,701
15%
366
360
383
11
394
3%
SLAC FTEs*
* does not include Projects or SciDAC
PED funding for full EXO ~$1.9M for 2011 assuming construction starts in FY13.
PED funding for SuperB $2.4M for the detector and $3.3M for the collider, assuming construction starts
in FY12.
Strengthen data analysis capability with the ATLAS Analysis facility: $1.5M for equipment and $1.2M
operational support, ramping to 7 FTEs in 2012.
Additional $1M (non-core) for general accelerator development.
Moving full EXO and SuperB from development into construction.
What accomplishments have been or will be achieved?
–
–
–
*
FY 2010
Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed?
–
*
FY 2009
Mod. PB
High level impacts
–
–
*
FY 2008
2011
EXO and SuperB proceed to CD-1.
Begin development of ATLAS Analysis Facility.
Continue accelerator development projects.
Significant issues and concerns
–
Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Aggressive program Budget
for current
workforce.
Page 19
B&R
KA1202011
KA1202011
KA1202012
KA1202012
KA120201
Description
Accelerator Operations: PEPII MMS
Accelerator Operations: PEP II D&D
Detector Operations
Babar D&D
B-factory Operations Total
ST B Factory
B-factory Complex Total
Control
FY 2007
36,400
FY 2008
15,534
23,946
8,610
60,346
24,144
FY 2009
Modified
President
Proposal
1,913
1,000
3,867
5,009
11,789
78,496
0
78496
35,994
0
35994
SLAC
FY 2010
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
9,250
Modified Scenario C
FY 2015
7,000
3,226
4,374
14,600
9,250
2,872
3,828
15,950
9,250
1,500
2,216
12,966
9,250
9,250
9,250
9,250
9,250
43
14,169
-2,747
16,916
61
15,480
1,060
14,420
67
16,030
6,750
9,280
55
13,046
3,796
9,250
44
9,330
80
9,250
44
9,330
80
9,250
44
9,330
80
9,250
264
264
264
264
263
263
263
Core Research
FTEs ST
Core Programs
Control
Research Projects
KA1301032
LSST MIE
KA1301032
EXO R&D
KA12010 - ** Super B Detector - PED
KA1301032
JDEM* warm electronics
KA12
IBL (FYI only…SLAC not the lead)
KA15020 - ** Super B Collaider - PED
KA1501041
FACET: MIE
KA1501041
FACET: Ops
Research Projects Total
KA1102054
KA1102053
KA11
KA11
LHC R&D Program
ATLAS Operations
LHC Support (LARP)
ATALS Analysis Facilities EQU
ATALS Analysis Facilities Ops
LHC R&D Program Total
FTEs
ILC R&D Total
FTEs
KA120103
KA130102
KA140103
KA140104
KA1502011
KA1502011
Other
University Service Accounts
National Lab Research EQU
Lab SciDAC Research
Theory Other
General Accel Development- Non Core
General Accel Development- Non Core -EQU
Other Total
FTEs
48,569
0
48,569
60,865
0
60,865
62,740
6,945
55,795
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,200
0
7,200
7,113
100
8,659
180
898
668
1,405
622
1,467
1,078
2,073
2,089
6
641
1,511
2,152
6
660
1,556
1,500
1,208
4,924
11
680
1,603
2,300
1,750
6,333
13
700
1,651
2,300
1,803
6,454
13
721
1,701
2,300
1,857
6,579
13
743
1,752
2,300
1,912
6,707
13
16,716
3,670
10,460
37
10,774
37
11,097
37
11,430
37
11,773
37
12,126
37
12,490
37
193
69
-
-
-
-
Projects/LHC/ILC/Other
FTEs: w/o Research Projects or SciDAC
702
54
927
825
18,721
6,568
1,446
31
31
66,494
7,301
59,193
3,000
1,860
2,400
3,300
1,205
6,000
17,765
0
44
2,000
0
2,075
10
44
3,000
250
3,325
15
1,000
44
3,348
0
4,392
15
21,824
53
24,910
58
38,178
63
680
54
64,571
7,102
57,469
-
68,488
7,519
60,969
70,544
7,746
62,798
72,661
7,979
64,682
74,841
8,219
66,622
5,000
4,020
5,000
10,000
10,720
5,800
23,000
20,360
5,800
12,000
20,360
5,500
7,800
6,180
28,000
7,800
6,365
40,685
6,750
6,556
62,466
3,050
6,753
47,663
44
3,448
0
3,492
15
44
3,551
0
3,595
15
44
3,658
0
3,702
15
44
3,768
0
3,812
15
49,255
65
62,507
65
84,873
65
70,672
65
142,381
372
166,864
372
Budget
OHEP104,961
Staff: March
2009
145,786Briefing
103,427 with98,733
120,701 3,
130,789
SLAC HEP Total
FTEs: SLAC HEP Total w/o R Projects & SciDAC
360
383
394
384
Page 20
154,843
372
What is next with the budget
*
As previously mentioned, with the exception of FACET the 2009 and 2010 budgets are
very consistent with current level of spending. Thus what you should expect is :
–
–
–
–
*
Mid Year Check-Point
–
–
*
Minor or no changes to your budget.
But there will be some major re-bucketing in the “DOE - HEP B&R codes”, that may mean new
charge numbers for your group.
Potentially more granularity in our tracking by project, particularly in KIPAC.
Please support these changes working with your Financial Planner.
We have already started our Mid year checkpoint, during this and next month. One of the
Financial Planners will be meeting with you to review your budget and current level of spending
This is a good time to correct spending trends to avoid overspending, but also to ensure that
the right people and services get charged to the correct accounts. Your financial planner will be
working with you.
Specifically if you are new to owning a budget.
–
–
–
There is an overview training that should answer most of your questions, about finance and
budget management . You are encouraged to attend.
The training will be held at Kavli 3rd Floor Conference Room, next Wednesday (3/25) from
10:00-11:30 am.
You can sign-in via SLAC web.
Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009
Page 21