From “Walled Gardens” into the “Telecom Chaos” Key trends in Contemporary Communication Systems

advertisement
From “Walled Gardens” into the
“Telecom Chaos”
Key trends in
Contemporary Communication Systems
Jens Zander
Director, Wireless@KTH
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
1
Outline – Technology track
• Key trends and challenges (JZ)
• Key area: Infrastructure (Jan Markendahl)
– Mobile Broadband and the ”Revenue Gap” (”teaser” today)
• Key area: Services & user behavior (Zary Segall)
– What would Google do ?
• Meeting 2: Networks & Services (Gerald Maguire)
• Meeting 3: Personal logistics & Terminals (Mark Smith)
• Meeting 4: Infrastructure deployment (Jan Markendahl)
Part I:
Key challenges & trends
3
Trend 1:
Much more for (even) less
4
The Long term Vision:
Wireless - A “Disappearing” Technology
Vanishing (”Hidden”) technology
Penetration
”Everyone” has it
Exclusive
Time
Mobile access
anytime – anywhere
1 device/person
Personal & home
networks
10 devices/person
”Things that communicate”
100-1000 devices/person
Trend 1: (Much) More for less
First fixed IP access – then mobile access
Vision 2000
• Mobile Web-browsing – the multimedia
service platform
• Interactive information services
• Streaming audio/video
• Rich exponentially growing content
• Adapted to small terminals
+ Location & context aware services
+ Same price as mobile telephony
TODAYs reality:
• Same price as home-ADSL
• Mobile telephony prices dropping
• Take-off was delayed – but
happening now
6
Traffic volumes rapidly increasing
Volume
• Flat rate tariffs create
data traffic boom
• Typical users:
Traffic
– EDGE 50 MB/month
– HSPA 800 MB/month
Revenue gap
• Revenues are not
following. Example:
Data traffic + 300%
Revenues +11%
Revenue
(”major operator data”)
Voice dominated
7
Data dominated
Time
Why is it so expensive ?
The 4 cost drivers
Csystem
• High bandwidth
 Buser Aservice f (Q)
N user
• Wide Area
• High speed mobility &
lossless handover
• Real time/low delay
1 Mbit/s at GSM service quality 
50-100 times more expensive
8
The street light analogy
Why are parts of Sweden dark at night ?
– Technical limitations ?
– User demand ?
– Economical limitations ?
9
Trend 2:
Bits are just bits and can be
produced anywhere –
now also in the mobile domain!
Services provided by anyone
- except the network operator ?
14
Open IP access- ”Intelligence Outside”
The Walled Garden
The Outback
Service n
Service 2
Content
provider
Service 3
Service 1
”Intelligent
Network” IMS
Service 3
Service n
Content
provider
”Dumb”
IPconnectivity
Service 2
Service 1
•
•
•
•
•
User
Terminal
User
Terminal
High QoS
Simple Terminals
Low flexibility
High cost
Required for new demanding applications
15
•
•
•
•
•
End-end principle
Best effort
High flexibility
Low cost
Mature application platforms
Computing in the cloud
”Infinite” bandwidth
Arbitrary distribution and physical
location of resources:
–
–
–
–
Computation
Storage
Sensors
….
Services not tied to neither networks nor access
16
The changing value chain
Affecting industry players
consumers
vendors
Telco
operator
’90s and before
today and the future
evolved users
vendors
Telco
operator
Mobile services .. ”over the top”
• Sufficient mobile bandwidth:
• Services ”over the top” (IP)
• No need for networked
services
• New Actors:
– Apple (Appstore)
– Google (Android Market)
• New Service paradigm
– Try & Buy
• Death of SMS, Voice ..?
(Google Talk ?)
Some consequences: Mobile TV
• Mobile TV –
–
–
–
–
Operator provided service
Streaming
Real-time
Existing TV-content
is dead !
• Personal Multi Media
– Individual personalized content
– Non-real time – on demand
– Time-shifting
is ”out there” and lives but without access operator intervention!
19
Questions for discussions
• Where is TS going in mobile ?
– High quality bit-pipe provider?
– Content aggregator
– (e.g. Mobile entertainment) ?
– Generic IP based Services
– Business solutions ….
20
Part II:
Challenges and potential
Showstoppers ahead ….
The Challenges & potential
”Showstoppers”
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Spectrum
”Shannon”
Energy
Cost
Complexity – Reliability
Legal issues
Health Hazards ?
New business models ?
Do we need more spectrum for
wireless access services ?
• Basically no: Higher data rate – short range
communication
• But: More spectrum – cheaper systems – less
energy
Low power
Spectrum
Efficiency
Low Infrastructure
Cost
Dynamic Access Modes for White Space Access
?
Opportunistic (Overlay) Access (”Cognitive Radio”)
Underlay Access (”UWB”)
Primary users
Temporarly unused spectrum, ”holes”
Business implications ?
• From ”exclusive ownership” – to
commodity
• Lower price of spectrum due to
– Increased supply of spectrum
– Increased interference from
secondary users
• Easier access to spectrum - more
competition
• More difficult to guarantee service ?
• New spectrum business models ?
Energy
• Global scale:
– Energy consumption of
IT-technology not neglectable
(2% of CO2-emission)
– 3G technology example
• Base station RF output (at antenna): 60 W
• Power input: 6 kW (Efficiency 1%)
• Reason Spectrum efficient – not power efficient
• Application scale:
– More processing, more power- battery life
does not keep up
– Low cost low maintenance (disposable)
devices _ extremely low power consumption
Storage
• Mobile Storage rapidly increasing
– 100KB  1TB .. and more
• Cost down
– HD < 10c / GB
– Flash < 1$/GB
• Always connected and everything stored
centrally OR Everything in the devices ?
• New storage based internet paradigm ?
The Vision
Complexity & Reliability
Yesterday
0.1-1.0 billion of users
Complex networks
Complex expensive devices
•
Complex to use
•
Does not scale
Tomorrow
10-100 billion of users and devices
Even more complex networks
Complex but in-expensive devices
•
Simple to use and deploy
•
Extremely reliable
•
Affordable for everyone
Some conclusions
• Key Opportunities:
– Moore’s law keeps going: more memory, more processing in
less space
– Plug-and-play / Zero configuration systems
• Key challenges:
– Energy – both global and battery life
– Spectrum – plenty availblable but difficult to access
– Complexity – Reliability
www.wireless.kth.se
30
Download