ACADEMIC SENATE
of
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
401 Golden Shore, Room 139
Long Beach, California 90802-4210
562-951-4010
MINUTES
Meeting of September 7, 2001
CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 10:40 a.m. on Thursday,
September 7, 2001, by Chair Jacquelyn Kegley.
ROLL CALL: Senators and alternates (*) attending the meeting were: (Bakersfield)
Jacquelyn Kegley, John Tarjan; (Chico) Kathleen Kaiser; (Dominguez Hills) Hal
Charnofsky, Dick Williams; (Fresno) Jacinta Amaral, Lester Pincu; (Fullerton) Vincent
Buck, Bill Meyer, Barry Pasternack; (Hayward) Calvin Caplan, Susan Sunderland;
(Humboldt) Robert Snyder, Marshelle Thobaben; (Long Beach) Gene Dinielli, David Hood,
Susan Rice; (Los Angeles) J. Theodore Anagnoson, Marshall Cates; (Maritime Academy)
James Wheeler; (Monterey Bay) Bobbi Bonace, J. Ken Nishita; (Northridge) Lynne Cook,
Michael Reagan, Barbara Swerkes; (Pomona) Rochelle Kellner, Marvin Klein; (Sacramento)
Cristy Jensen, Thomas Krabacher, Louise Timmer; (San Bernardino) Buckley Barrett,
Jeanne King; (San Diego) Ray Boddy, Brent Rushall, Thomas Warschauer; (San Francisco)
Eunice Aaron, Robert Cherny, Jan Gregory; (San Jose) David McNeil, Kenneth Peter,
Bethany Shifflett; (San Luis Obispo) Reginald Gooden, Myron Hood; (San Marcos) Dick
Montanari, A. Sandy Parsons; (Sonoma) Philip McGough, Susan McKillop; (Stanislaus)
John Sarraille, Mark Thompson; (Chancellor's Office) David Spence.
INTRODUCTIONS
During the course of the meeting the Chair introduced:
Mary Allen, Director, Institute for Teaching and Learning, CSU
Louis Caldera, Vice Chancellor, University Advancement, CSU
Daniel Cartwright, CSU Student Trustee, CSU Stanislaus
Harold Goldwhite, Faculty Trustee and Professor of Chemistry, CSU Los Angeles
Gary Hammerstrom, Associate Vice Chancellor, Academic Affairs, CSU
Ron Kroman for Donald Moore, Emeritus and Retired Faculty Association (non-voting
delegate)
Michael Lee, ACE Fellow, CSU Sacramento
Susan Meisenhelder, President, California Faculty Association
LaLisha Norton, California State Student Association Liaison to Academic Senate CSU
David Spence, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Academic Officer, CSU
Susan Sunderland, New Senator, CSU Hayward
Richard West, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer, CSU
Deborah Hennessy, Executive Director, Academic Senate CSU
Margaret Price, Assistant to Executive Director, Academic Senate CSU
Shirley Sparkman, Staff Assistant–Budget, Academic Senate CSU
Tracy Butler, Administrative Assistant, Academic Senate CSU
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS
REPORT OF CHAIR JACQUELYN ANN K. KEGLEY
May–August, 2001
Campus Compact Intermediate Institute: The Engaged Department-San Diego, June 19-22
Participated in this California Campus Compact-sponsored summer institute for academic
departments exclusively from campuses in the California State University (CSU). The
institute, facilitated by national experts, covered a number of topics including disciplinespecific models of service learning; assessing community-based work at both the faculty and
student level; community-based work as a vehicle of curricular integration; the community
partner as departmental resource and the department as community resource. Participating
in the Institute were the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at Cal Poly Pomona, the
Department of Political Science at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, the Department of
Communication Education at CSU Fresno, and the Department of Sociology at CSU Fullerton.
Also taking part were the Department of Linguistics at CSU Long Beach, the Department of
Art at CSU Northridge, the Department of Art at CSU Sacramento, the Department of
Educational Psychology and Counseling at CSU San Bernardino, the Department of
Communication Studies at CSU Stanislaus, the Department of Communication Studies at
Humboldt State, the Department of Sociology at San Diego State, and the Health Science
Department at San Jose State. This activity demonstrates again the excellent work being done
by CSU faculty members on community service learning and civic engagement.
ICAS and ICC Activities
Two meetings of ICAS (Intersegmental Committee of Academic Senates of the California
Community Colleges, the California State University and the University of California) were
held during this period: May 30 and June 26. One of the main topics for these meetings was
the work of articulation and alignment of lower-division major courses for transfer. This
involves relationships between the IMPAC program, an effort of all three segments; our
CSU lower-division efforts and CAN (the California Articulation Numbering system).
These efforts are all progressing nicely and three of the CSU Statewide Senate projects are
moving this fall to involve community college and UC faculty in their efforts. Another
concern of ICAS is a proposal by the ICC (Intersegmental Coordinating Council) and the
California Round Table (includes the Chief Executive Officers of all four segments) to
initiate a Blue Ribbon Commission on Transfer. ICAS has two major concerns about this
commission, which will be chaired by Gary Hart. There is concern that this commission is
duplicative and may not take adequate account of the many transfer efforts now in
progress. Another concern is adequate faculty involvement in such an effort. Negotiations
continue on this matter. ICAS is also monitoring Assembly Bill 1603 that demands an
extensive common course numbering system from the community colleges. This bill could
impact CSU and could have negative impact on current transfer efforts. Finally, ICAS is
writing a budget proposal for 2001-2002 to support work on the development of
competency statements in the natural sciences and in history and the social sciences. It is
very important to provide K-12 and the community colleges with expectations of
competencies for work at the university level. These also need to be aligned with the new
K-12 standard statements.
2
The Intersegmental Budget Process Committee met June 5 and July 12. Three budget
proposals are in the process of being finalized while a fourth on transfer activities is still in
process. A multiple proposal for alignment of standards will include the ICAS competency
statement project; the funding for Writing and Math Diagnostic Services; and funds for an
a-g interactive guide for students. The two other budget proposals are for Academic
Improvement and Achievement and for Student Friendly Services.
The Intersegmental Coordinating Council met on July 13. There was a detailed report on
the work of the Task Force on Alignment of Assessments that included draft goals and
principles for developing a relationship between the K-12 standards and the Golden State
Examinations. Extensive discussion occurred on the Transfer: The Next Generation project.
A small group will meet with Gary Hart to continue working out details on this project.
Reports were also given on the California Gear-Up Program and a forthcoming workshop
for AIAA. Dates were also set for the ICC retreat and for future meetings.
Executive Committee Meetings
Two meetings of the new Executive Committee took place on June 13 and July 9. In
addition to selecting senators for committees, four task force groups have been established.
The first is the Task Force on Intellectual Property to be chaired by Paul Spear, former senator
from CSU Chico and a member of the Senate group that worked with the SUNY senate to
develop the Fair Use booklet. Other members of the Task Force are Rollie Hauser, CSU
Chico; Marshelle Thobaben, Humboldt State; Buckley Barrett, CSU San Bernardino; Gary
Hammerstrom, Gerald Hanley and Cher Thomas from the Chancellor’s Office.
Representatives from CSSA and from the UC senate will join the group.
The second is the Task Force on the Roles and Responsibilities of Chairs that will be chaired by
Sally Veregge from CSU San Jose. Other members of the group are Don Chu, CSU Chico;
Marvin Klein, Cal Poly Pomona; Gary Kessler, CSU Bakersfield; Dick Montanari, CSU San
Marcos; and Don Wort, CSU Hayward.
The third, theTask Force on Graduate and Post-baccalaureate Education in the CSU will be
chaired by Cristy Jensen, CSU Sacramento. Other members of the group will be Les Pincu,
CSU, Fresno; Calvin Caplan, CSU Hayward; Gene Dinielli CSU, Long Beach; and Sam
Edelman, CSU Chico. Three graduate deans will also be placed on the committee.
The work of these three groups is an important part of the pro-active agenda for the
Academic Senate CSU this year and we will be hearing much more from them as the year
progresses.
The final Task Force to be initiated is the Master Plan Strategy Task Force chaired by Susan
McKillop, Sonoma State, and assisted by Jim Wheeler, Maritime Academy as vice chair.
This task force has five important charges.
(1) To monitor all Master Plan activities and to alert the Senate of needed responses
(2) To organize and facilitate observation and participation by senators and the Chair in
Master Plan workgroup meetings and hearings
(3) To set up an informational website
(4) To provide reports from senators on their observations and participation in the
Master Plan activities
3
(5)
To make recommendations for actions that the Senate and its committees consider
relevant to the Master Plan.
A number of senators will be called upon to assist this very important work.
In addition, the Chancellor has established a Task Force on Dual Admissions. Senators
serving on this group are: Ray Boddy, San Diego; Rochelle Kellner, Pomona; Tim
Hegstrom, San José; and Tim Kersten, SLO. Three groups, initiated last year, will be
continuing their work. These are the Faculty Flow Task Force, the Workload Task Force,
and the Off-Campus Centers Study Group.
The Executive Committee also viewed a presentation on the new public relations and
communications plan. A number of suggestions were made for revision. Assurances were
also given that faculty will be asked to serve on the steering committee that is overseeing
the development of this plan.
Meetings with Chancellor Reed and Vice Chancellor Caldera
On Wednesday, July 11, the Executive Committee met with Vice Chancellor Louis Caldera
to get acquainted and to discuss Senate issues and common values especially those of
nondiscrimination and tolerance. There was also discussion of the new public relations
plan and ways the Senate and faculty could be supportive of university advancement
activities.
On Wednesday evening the Executive Committee had dinner with Chancellor Reed,
Laurence Gould, Chair of the Board of Trustees, Harold Goldwhite, Faculty Trustee, and
Executive Vice Chancellor David Spence. There was frank discussion of the faculty
reaction to the evaluation of the Chancellor as well as problems in faculty-Chancellor,
faculty-Board relationships. All parties pledged to continue to try to improve relationships
and various suggestions were made on how this might happen.
CSU Board of Trustees Meeting–July 10-11
Two major items considered and passed by the Board of Trustees were the report of the
Committee on Alcohol Policies and Prevention Programs and a statement on Student
Participation in Policy Development. The latter statement was worked out through last
year in a number of meetings between the Senate and CSSA and by a special committee
established by Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Academic Officer David Spence. This
statement essentially spells out student participation and governance practices as they exist
on a number of our campuses. The report submitted by the Committee on Alcohol Policies
and Prevention Programs is an excellent one; senators and campus senates should study
and consider the recommendations of this report for implementation on their campuses.
The new Executive Committee of the Senate was introduced to the Board. Chair Gould
also urged Board members to attend the Academic Conference of the Senate to be held in
San Diego November 28-30, 2001. Student recipients of this year’s William R. Hearst/CSU
Trustee Awards for Outstanding Achievements were introduced and recognized.
Chancellor Reed reported that Vice Chancellor Chuck Lindahl is retiring from Academic
Affairs after 37 years service to the CSU. The Board approved a resolution designating
Chuck as Vice Chancellor emeritus.
4
Fall 2001 Academic Conference – November 28-30 in San Diego
The Fall 2001 Academic Conference theme will be: "Quality Education Through Diversity."
We are fortunate to have confirmed Dr. Ronald Takaki, an internationally recognized
scholar of multicultural studies, as our keynote speaker for Wednesday evening,
November 28. The title of Dr. Takaki’s talk is: “Why Multiculturalism Matters: A
Curriculum for the 21st Century.” Conference Planning Committee Co-Chairs Kathy
Kaiser and Dave McNeil have started contacting campus senate chairs to coordinate
campus presentations to be made during the conference.
October 4, 2001
[See Note]
If your schedules permit, please hold October 4 on your calendar for a reception on
Thursday, October 4, 2001, at 5:30 p.m., at the Chancellor’s home in Long Beach. Dr. Reed
is inviting all members of the Academic Senate CSU and all campus academic senate chairs
to his home (invitations will be in the mail next week). [Please Note: This reception has
been rescheduled––November 29 in San Diego.]
Don Moore
As many of you know, Don Moore is the liaison to the Senate representing ERFA, he is an
emeritus professor of Economics and Statistics. Earlier this month Don was involved in a
small plane crash; fortunately he is now home recovering from surgery. A plant along
with our get well wishes was delivered to his home earlier this week. Look forward to
seeing you September 6-7.
*****
Standing Committee Reports:
Academic Affairs Committee On behalf of the AAC, Chair Snyder provided the
following report. Academic Affairs provided input on the revision of a number of
Executive Orders. The E.O.'s for grading symbols, E.O. 171, 179, 268, and 320, are being
combined into one new order. This revision is based on input from the campuses and
Academic Affairs. The Chancellor's Office would like to finalize this before the end of this
semester. We provided input on a number of details. There was concern about the
increased number of administrative symbols but there was no consensus in the committee
that this should be changed. We also provided input on E.O. 466 which governs special
sessions. The Chancellor's Office is requesting a response by November 15 from the
campuses and from ASCSU. This revision looks good and we commend the Chancellor's
Office on the level of faculty involvement in the curricular process involved in special
sessions. The chair will draft a letter for Chair Kegley to send to the Chancellor. The rest
of the session was devoted to topics of interest for the upcoming year. We discussed the
Master Plan Task Force, the Ad Hoc Committee on Graduate Education, remediation
issues, issues surrounding the joint use facilities, academic standards and assessment.
Faculty Affairs Committee Chair David Hood reported on behalf of the FAC.
Faculty Affairs has one resolution to present to the Senate which proposes a Senate policy
on the evaluation of systemwide administrators.
Fiscal and Governmental Affairs Committee Chair Krabacher reported on behalf of the
FGA. Acting on the Executive Committee’s request, the Fiscal and Governmental Affairs
Committee took up the question of prioritizing items contained in the “unspecified”
5
below-the-line budget requests found in the CSU’s 2002/03 Support Budget Planning
Scenarios at its September 6, 2001 meeting. The Committee recommends the Academic
Senate should argue for the following:
1. that the Chancellor’s Office to seek, at a minimum, the funding identified in the
2002/03 Partnership Budget;
2. that allocation of the $17 million (or whatever amount ultimately budgeted) in the
“Unspecified” category be made according the priority list approved by the
Academic Senate in May 2001; and
3. that all parties recognize that compensation is the top priority on the Senate’s May
2001 list.
CSUCI Report
Thirteen faculty have been hired as the initial faculty for CSUCI. Eight of the new faculty
met with the CSUCI Faculty Council, Executive Committee of the Academic Senate,
Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Academic Officer David Spence and Associate Vice
Chancellor Gary Hammerstrom on Wednesday, September 5, for an orientation to the CSU
and faculty governance. Academic Senate Chair Jackie Kegley provided a governance
framework, Vice Chair Bob Cherny introduced the CSU governance policies and papers.
Faculty Council Chair Cook described the background of the Council; presented the
constitution, bylaws, and policies developed by the Council; and delivered a complete
archives of documents collected and developed by the Faculty Council acting on behalf of
the new faculty. Vice Chancellor Spence described the background for establishing the
Faculty Council and welcomed the new faculty. Associate Vice Chancellor Hammerstrom
distributed an Academic Affairs organizational chart and encouraged the faculty to make
use of the assistance available at the Chancellor’s Office. The new Vice President for
Academic Affairs, Alexander Mc Neill began his service this week. Searches are underway
for several other administrative positions. Council Chair Cook indicated that the CSUCI
faculty soon should elect their officers and an observer for Academic Senate meetings. She
assured them that the Faculty Council members and Academic Senate will gladly serve or
will help to identify others who will serve as resources to the CSUCI faculty as needed.
President Rush will host a luncheon for the Faculty Council and Search Committee on
September 29. The September 5 orientation meeting concluded the official service of the
CSUCI Faculty Council appointed by the Academic Senate CSU. Chair Cook thanked the
Senate for its continuing support and assistance and thanked the Faculty Council and
Search Committee members for their exceptional service over the last two years.
TEKR Chair Cook reported that she attended the July legislative hearings on S.B. 713 and
noted that Chancellor Reed began his testimony by submitting for the record and
supporting our resolution, AS-2532-01/FGA/TEKR. She noted that the hearing went well
and that there was considerable testimony in support of the CSU and the bill.
TEKR had a productive meeting. Cook thanked the Executive Committee for assembling
such a strong committee for TEKR. New members were oriented to the committee charge,
the Trustees’ Commitment to Prepare High Quality Teachers, and teacher education issues
and nomenclature. Subcommittee reports addressed a new administrative credential
structure, potential for a joint initiative with JPL/NASA and the CSU, the Governor’s
6
Teaching Fellowship awards, and the systemwide evaluation of teacher education. TEKR
outlined its major agenda items for the year, with four continuing from last year: (1)
monitoring teacher education related issues such as implementation of the Governor’s
Teaching Fellowships, implementation of common admission standards (Executive Order
758) and related policy matters and legislation; (2) providing oversight and analysis of
CalStateTEACH implementation, evaluation and future directions (as assigned to TEKR
by the Senate) with regular reports to the Senate; (3) with liaisons from FGA and
Academic Affairs, articulating programmatic guidelines for campuses to consider in
developing Ed.D. degrees; and (4) working with community colleges, especially in relation
to the Senate’s resolution encouraging campuses to accept up to six units of teacher
preparation transfer credit and other efforts to improve articulation and shared
responsibility for teacher recruitment and preparation.
A new and most significant priority for TEKR is to provide faculty leadership for the
implementation of the new subject matter standards for teacher preparation that were
adopted by the CCTC on September 6. Cook reminded senators that TEKR and the
Executive Committee were briefed on the draft standards last spring. The Senate was
given the report and website information in May, and asked to respond to the draft and to
encourage their campus colleagues to do so as well. A meeting was held in San Francisco
on July 13 to allow CSU administrators and faculty to provide feedback to CCTC. The
three areas of greatest concern to the CSU were subsequently modified in the standards.
The primary thrust of the new standards is to align the subject matter preparation of
teachers with the K-12 academic content standards and frameworks. This is a significant
national reform issue and one known to be critical for effective teacher preparation.
California lags behind other states in this effort, but the new standards will help to
promote this reform. TEKR and the Executive Committee are combining efforts so that
faculty, via Senate leadership, will take a proactive role in designing effective programs.
Senators commented on the need to make this an all-system responsibility and not view it
as an issue effecting a single program or area. There was encouragement to proceed
quickly because if curriculum changes are needed they will need to be made soon in order
to secure all appropriate approvals and be prepared to offer programs by January 2004 as
required by the state.
Faculty Trustee Harold Goldwhite Preview of the Upcoming Meeting of the Board of
Trustees, September 11-12, 2001, at the Office of the Chancellor
Colleagues: I will again be offering you a brief and preview of forthcoming Board
meetings during the current academic year. The complete text of the Board agenda is
generally posted on the Board website at:
http://www.calstate.edu/BOT/Agendas/index.shtml(http://www.calstate.edu/BOT/A
gendas/index.shtml)
<http://www.calstate.edu/BOT/Agendas/index.shtml(http://www.calstate.edu/BOT/
Agendas/index.shtml)>
about two weeks before the meeting.
After a closed session on personnel matters including executive review the Committee of
the Whole will receive the semi-annual litigation report of the most significant litigation
involving the CSU selected from some 165 currently active cases. New cases include two
7
where objections are being raised to Environmental Impact Reports for the proposed
Behavioral and Social Sciences Building at Humboldt and the National Sports Training
Center at Dominguez Hills. The Committee of the Whole will also hear the Final Report
on the Earthquake recovery Program at Northridge.
The Ad Hoc Committee on Off-Campus Facilities will be asked to accept a gift of real
property for a San Diego off-campus center at Brawley, to be administered in conjunction
with the Calexico center.
The Committee on Finance will receive reports on the final 2001-2002 support budget, the
proposed 2002-2003 support and lottery revenue budgets, and CSU investments; and will
act on proposals from several campuses for bond issues and new developments.
The Committee on Campus Planning, Buildings and Grounds will act on changes to the
2001-2002 capital outlay program; the 5-year capital improvement program for 2002
through 2007; and schematic plans for projects at Channel Islands and Sonoma,
The Committee on Governmental Relations will act on the Board's legislative program
which includes a possible bill authorizing an independent Ed.D. for the CSU which will be
heard in January 2002.
As usual the part of the agenda of the Committee on Collective Bargaining that is of most
interest to faculty will no doubt be part of the closed session of that Committee.
The Committee on Institutional Advancement will hear of plans for 2001-2002 and will
recommend the naming of several facilities at San Bernardino.
The Committee on University and Faculty Personnel will hear a proposal that for 20012002 all CSU Presidents will receive a 2% across-the-board salary increase with no "merit"
adjustments––a reflection of CSU management's position on compensation for all
employees in the current academic year.
The Committee on Educational Policy will hear a proposal for revisions of Title 5
Language on fee refunds and non-resident tuition; a report on the evaluation of teacher
preparation programs in the CSU; and will act on fast-track program proposals from
Fresno, Long Beach, and Stanislaus. As always I welcome your questions and comments
via email or telephone (office number 323-343-2373; home number 626-441-1955).
8
ACTION
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The agenda, having been moved and seconded, was
approved.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes, having been moved and seconded, were
approved.
AS-2546-01/EX CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate of the California State University transfer Article
II Section 1 through 8 of the Constitution of the Academic Senate of the
California State University to Article II of the Bylaws; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That Article II Section 1 of the Constitution now read:
Membership: The membership of the Academic Senate shall be decided by
the Academic Senate under provisions in the Bylaws of the Academic
Senate.
RATIONALE: As the number and sizes of the campuses of the California
State University change over time, the Academic Senate CSU may find it
necessary to reconsider membership. Because the process to amend the
Senate’s Constitution is so complex and time-consuming, this resolution
transfers this authority to the Bylaws, enabling the campus senates and the
Academic Senate CSU to be free to make recommendations more generally
on representation.
AS-2546-01/EX motion postponed to November plenary.
AS-2547-01/EX
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AT THE BEGINNING
OF THE 21ST CENTURY: MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE
PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate of the California State University adopt the
report, The California State University at the Beginning of the 21st Century:
Meeting the Needs of the People of California; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate CSU provide copies of this report to members of
the Board of Trustees, campus presidents and provosts, and members of
the legislature, along with campus senate chairs; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate CSU thank the campuses for their invaluable
advice during the preparation of this report.
RATIONALE: During the 2000-2001 academic year, the Academic Affairs
committee of the Academic Senate CSU prepared the initial draft of the attached
report. Campuses were asked for their advice at several steps of the drafting
process, and they responded with many valuable suggestions. During Spring
2001, an ad hoc drafting committee revised and refined the draft in the light of
9
advice from campuses. The purpose of the report is to present the concerns of the
Academic Senate CSU to policy-making bodies, the Board of Trustees and the
legislature, who are responsible for policy-making and budget-making for the CSU.
AS-2547-01/EX motion approved unanimously.
AS-2548-01/FA
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate of the California State University (CSU) express
its regret that the numerous concerns stated by faculty during the
performance review of the Chancellor were not substantively addressed by
the CSU Board of Trustees in its evaluation letter of June 4, 2001; and be it
further
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate CSU urge the Board of Trustees to explore––in
collaboration with the Academic Senate CSU––other means of undertaking
and presenting the results of its performance reviews of CSU
administrators; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate CSU develop and recommend to the Chancellor
and Board of Trustees policy for review of senior systemwide
administrators.
RATIONALE: This resolution encourages collegial efforts on the part of the
Academic Senate of the California State University (CSU), administrators in the
CSU, and the CSU Board of Trustees to design and articulate improved methods of
performance review of senior administrators. The present system of performance
reviews of senior system administrators is incongruent with best practice in higher
education, conducted according to the practice of another field of endeavor, and
fails to acknowledge the responses of individuals who have responded in good faith
to requests for comment. The resolution thus speaks to the disappointment in, and
cynicism about, the process now felt by many faculty in the CSU.
AS-2548-01/FA motion approved without dissent.
AS-2549-01/FGA
SUPPORT OF SB 1212 (ROMERO)
RESOLVED:
That the Academic Senate of the California State University (CSU) urge
passage of SB 1212 (Romero); and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the Chair of the Academic Senate CSU transmit this resolution to
Governor Gray Davis, Senator Gloria Romero, and Assembly Speaker
Robert Hertzberg.
RATIONALE: SB 1212 assures preservation of due process in grievance
procedures for California State University faculty.
AS-2549-01/FGA motion withdrawn (AS-2537-01 also addresses SB 1212).
10
The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m. on Friday, September 7, 2001.
*****
Approved (or corrected)
Date:________________________
_______________________________
Jacquelyn Ann K. Kegley, Chair
_______________________________
Les Pincu, Secretary
________________________________
Margaret Price, Recording Secretary
11