Writer Reader English 1113 Commentary Essay, Peer Review Workshop What issue, specifically, is the writer addressing? Why is it relevant? Underline the writer’s thesis—is it located at the end of the introduction? Underline the topic sentences; list the key words for each one below: 1. 2. Compare each support sentence to its topic sentence, and highlight any sentence that does not CLEARLY support the topic sentence. Read the last sentence of each paragraph; indicate with a “yes” or a “no” whether it points back to the main argument. Describe the writer’s ethos: How effective is the writer’s ethos? How could s/he make her ethos stronger? How persuasive is the commentary? What details convince you of the writer’s perspective? How could the writer make his/her commentary stronger? Writer’s questions: o o Writer Reader Peer Review Workshop: Style and Usage 1. Highlight (in one color) ALL of the following Weak and Wordy sentence constructions: There is/was/are/were This is/was; These are/were It is/was/ Lesson: Make the Subject the Subject! 2. Circle ALL “to be” verbs: is, was, are, were, being, been Lesson: Use Active Verbs! 3. Underline ALL vague or general words: Everybody, everyone, someone, somebody, things, stuff, areas, kinds, and all forms of “you” Lesson: Use Precise Language! 4. Double-underline ALL informal or slang language: Well, now, thru, kind of, etc.; empty words: very, really, totally, so (when used as adjective) 5. Highlight (in a 2nd color) usage errors and typos and bracket confusing sentences: Fragments (make them complete) Comma Splices (comma where a period should be) Subject Verb agreement Pronoun Agreement (their MUST refer to a plural noun) DO NOT REWRITE OR CROSS OUT ANY OF YOUR PEER’S TEXT! Notes: