NASA Food Systems; Past, Present and Future Michele Perchonok, Ph.D. Advanced Food System Lead/JSC Mercury (1961 – 1963) Objective To orbit a manned spacecraft around Earth To investigate man’s ability to function in space To recover both man and spacecraft safely Food System Highly engineered foods (Meal in a Pill) Tube food (not seen or smelled/ unacceptable texture) Cubes: (no change in flavor, texture: unlike original product) No crumbs Gemini (1965 – 1966) Objective To subject men and equipment to space flight up to 2 weeks in duration Food System Highly engineered foods (Meal in a Pill) More variety Shrimp cocktail Chicken and vegetables Butterscotch pudding Applesauce Apollo (1968 – 1972) Objective To land Americans on the Moon and return them safely to Earth Food System Improved packaging with improved quality Intermediate Moisture Food/ Natural Form Ready-to Eat Thermostabilized: flexible packages, aluminum cans First to use “spoon bowl” – container that is opened and contents eaten with a spoon Skylab (1973 – 1974) First space station with a laboratory Food stored at time of initial launch; no chance for resupply Ready to eat, rehydratable foods Precooked, thermally stabilized or fresh food Beverages: collapsible plastic accordion-like dispensers Pre-cooked or fresh food kept frozen Shuttle/Mir (1995-1998) Typical Russian Space Menu Plan 6 Day cycle, 4 meals per day Half Russian, half U.S. meals Shuttle food warmer used to heat U.S. food Shuttle drinking water containers used U.S. condiments Delivered to Mir by Shuttle and Progress 9 month shelf life Shuttle (1981-present) International Space Station (2000 – present) Foods are individually packaged All foods are preprocessed (except fresh foods) Thermostabilized Dehydrated/Freeze dried Intermediate moisture Natural form Irradiated Physiological Effects Of Spaceflight Weight loss Fluid shift Dehydration Constipation Electrolyte imbalance Calcium loss Potassium loss Decreased red blood cell mass Space motion sickness FOOD AND NUTRITION Initiating Events Risk Factors Outcomes Consequences Altered nutrient bioavailability Malnutrition Bone loss Further consequences Microgravity Inadequate food intake Microbial and chemical contamination of food Remote Environment Mission Duration Technical limitations of food preservation Inadequate food system DEATH Muscle wasting Unsafe food Renal stone risk Incapacitation Human performance failure Adequate nutritional requirements Infectious disease Hematological changes Psychological issues Failure of countermeasures Carcinogenesis Delayed return to flight status Inability to rehabilitate Pre-, in- and postflight nutritional assessment Radiation Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points plan Specialized food packaging Development of extended shelflife food Understanding the psychological benefits of food Loss of flight status Advanced Food System The Advanced Food System is responsible for developing a food system for the crew of a long duration mission that is safe, nutritious, and acceptable The Advanced Food System will initially emphasize technologies for space vehicle applications (ISS and Shuttle) then slowly increase focus on technologies toward tasks that support exploration. Assumption: There are psychological benefits of the food system and plants Socialization during mealtimes Food quality, variety and acceptability are important and encourage eating a well-balanced diet. Highly acceptable food is a familiar element in an unfamiliar and hostile environment, especially important as mission durations increase. MARS SURFACE MICROGRAVITY Prepackaged food system HYPOGRAVITY (1/6 Earth) Planetary food system Prepackaged food system Hydroponic crop processing Bioregeneration of oxygen and carbon dioxide EARTH Implementation Timeline for Food System POTATO SWEET POTATO VEGETABLES WHEAT bread pasta cereal SOYBEANS soymilk tofu tempeh DRY PEANUT BEAN RICE oil spread PLANETARY FOOD SYSTEM STORED SYSTEM STORED FOODFOOD SYSTEM Assessment of current preservation techniques Crops Grown in Chambers Shelf-life extension Packaging New Technologies Additives Salad Crops VEHICLE STORED FOOD SYSTEM tomato carrot chard spinach cabbage onion lettuce radish Food Processing Technology Food Brought on Board Food List Palatability of Food Nutrition Preliminary Menu Design Variety Re-evaluate Crop List and//or Develop Additional Shelf-stable Foods Crop Availability Detailed Nutritional Analysis Does not meet nutritional requirements Not acceptable CONSTRAINTS: • Crew time • Shelf life • Safety • Storage Meets nutritional requirements Test Menu in Controlled Environment Acceptable BASELINE MENU CONSTRAINTS: • Multipurpose equipment • Automated equipment • Safety • Power • Size • Water use • Air contaminants • Waste generated • Noise QUANTITATE: • Waste generated • Intake • Preparation/processing time • Acceptability Food System - Safety Foods will be free of microbial contamination Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) will be done on all processes to maintain safety Microbial growth can affect: Food safety Food acceptability Flavor Appearance including color Texture Food System - Nutrition Menus must provide adequate nutrition for long duration missions Minimum of 100% of the United States Recommended Daily Intake (USRDI) Adjustments to be made to compensate for affects from long duration space mission Higher calcium Lower iron Lower sodium TBD Food System - Acceptability Acceptability of food of prime importance in long duration missions Crew often do not eat as much on space missions Decreased energy intake may compromise performance Need large variety of foods to avoid menu fatigue Provides opportunity for socialization Decreases stress “More like home” Transit Food System Microgravity requires use of prepackaged food system Prepackaged food items will use similar preservation methods to Shuttle and ISS Thermal Processing, Freeze Drying, Irradiation, Intermediate moisture foods, Natural form foods Other preservation methods such as non-thermal processing will be evaluated (pulsed electric field, ultra-high hydrostatic pressure) Minimize mass and volume of total prepackaged food system Transit Food System - Constraints Shelf life of 3 – 5 years Safe Nutritional Acceptable Packaging Compatible with processing and storage conditions Volume and mass constraints Consider bio-degradable, compactable, reusable packaging to minimize solid processing Selected Crops Salad Crops Tomato Carrot Spinach Cabbage Green Onion Lettuce Radish Herbs Bell Pepper Strawberry CAN BE USED FRESH Other crops Potato Sweet potato Wheat Soybeans Peanut Rice Dried beans NEED PROCESSING Potential Menu Items Crops Potato Wheat Soybean Rice Tomato Peanut Sample Crop Foods Potato, starch, sweet potato syrup Wheat flour, seitan, starch Soy flour, tofu, soymilk, whey, meat analogs, okara, Rice, rice milk, rice flour Tomato, sauce, juice Peanut butter, oil, meat analogs The food system must balance the constraints of the crop varieties and the requirements of making the crew meals. Crop variation, harvest to harvest Specific crop plant to plant, cultivars ingredient functionality Nutrition High food quality CROPS CREW MEALS Crop storage and shelf life Crop availability with quantity and frequency Appropriate quantities of food Food safety ADVANCED FOOD Varied choices growth harvest WHEAT seeds mill starch extruder starch/gluten separator cereal flour snacks gluten pasta seiten bread growth harvest seeds + water Rizopus oligosporus Okara Tempeh fiber Soy milk Soy Tofu + Whey Food Processing Equipment Constraints Water and Energy Limitations Limited water for processing and cleaning - consider recycling of water during processing to capture lost nutrients Restricted power for food processing and cleaning Waste and Contamination Concerns Waste water processing time Restricted power Competitive bacterial contamination of water processing system Crew Involvement Constraints Time Constraints Maximize exploration time Minimize daily task time Ease of cleaning Ease of assembly/disassembly Automation Constraints Saves time Technologically intensive In case of power failure, is there a simple procedure for manual override? Food Preparation - Galley Menu will incorporate food items produced from processed crops and resupply items Menu will provide enough variety to prevent “burn-out” Potential preparation equipment includes Bread maker Pasta maker Juicer/pulper Blender/food processor Rice cooker Dryer/oven System Integration is very important Life Support Systems Air Revitalization Water Recovery Thermal Control Biomass Production Solid Waste Management Medical Operations Nutrition Human Factors Psychosocial Habitability Current Projects Shelf Life Determination There is a need for the prepackaged food system to have a shelf life of 3 – 5 years; safety, nutrition, acceptability Challenge: Commercial food items don’t require a shelf life of 3 – 5 years Challenge: Packaging that has minimal mass and maximum barrier properties Challenge: Variety is important; there is a need for a large number of food items Challenge: There is a need for food items with high acceptability Salad Crop Handling Procedures Evaluate chamber grown vegetables for acceptability, texture, color Lettuce Tomatoes Spinach Bok Choy Carrots Develop HACCP procedures including sanitation Challenge: Quality and yield will vary from crop to crop. How can menus and daily nutrition intakes be planned? Bulk Ingredient Menu Development It may be possible to carry to the surface staple bulk ingredients with a shelf life of 3 – 5 years Will be able to compare the cost of bulk ingredients vs. growing crops Challenge: Determine yield of processed ingredients using miniaturized equipment High Protein Bread Functional properties of the wheat is strongly dependent on its composition (protein, fat, and moisture) and the chemical properties of these macronutrients Formula includes flour (including bran), salt, yeast, sugar, oil, and water. No additives were included to minimize resupply Challenge: Whole wheat flour is more difficult to work with. Need to know composition of wheat prior to processing Challenge: Need to incorporate processing by-products into bread formula Challenge: Small variation in ingredient functionality can cause failure in delivery of acceptable food products Soymilk, Tofu, Okara, and Whey (STOW) Processor Properties Flexible in processing methods and types of end products (can produce firm, extra-firm, soft, tofu styles, okara, soymilk) Automated with manual over-ride Easily modifiable design Challenges High water use and waste water generation and power consumption Cleaning & sanitizing Labor & crew time Storage and footprint By-product yields STOW Processor Supporting Research & Technology Development External University Research ALS NSCORT – Purdue University, Alabama A&M, Howard University Tuskegee University Physical, sensory and chemical attributes of the glucose syrup, peanut protein meat analog, ready-to-eat breakfast cereal, and the sweet potato drink Characterization and quantification of residual volatiles generated during extrusion Shelf-life studies of developed products, using the edible peanut protein film Food Technology Commercial Space Center at ISU Supporting Research & Technology Development Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Phase I – 6 month, high risk Biodegradable Nanocomposites for Advanced Packaging Fortification of Shelf Stable Formulated Foods with Antioxidants Phase II – 3 years, potential for commercialization New High-Barrier Polymer Nanocomposite Food Packaging Enables 5-Year Shelf-Life Multifunctional Sanitation Method for Food Processing NASA Research Announcement (NRA) Reheating and Sterilization Technology for Food, Waste and Water A dual use package will be developed that incorporates the technology of ohmic heating. Ohmic heating can provide a dual function of food reheating and waste containment and sterilization. A Multipurpose Fruit and Vegetable Processing System for Advanced Life Support A multipurpose fruit and vegetable processor will be designed and constructed for use under hypogravity conditions. The processor, with interchangeable parts, but using same power source and controls, will be useful in processing a variety of fruits and vegetables being proposed for the Advanced Life Support. Website www.advlifesupport.jsc.nasa.gov