ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT OF ALCOHOL
INDUSTRY
IN UTTAR PRADESH
DR. YASHPAL SINGH
CHIEF ENVIRONMENT OFFICER
U.P. Pollution Control Board
Lucknow,India
The Study Team
A. Coordination:
1. Dr. C.S.Bhatt, Member Secretary, UPPCB
2. Dr. Yashpal Singh, Chief Environment Officer, UPPCB
3. Er. Pradeep Sharma, Asstt. Environment Engr., UPPCB.
B. Study Executed by:
ENV Developmental Assistance Systems (INDIA) Pvt. Ltd.,
Lucknow.
Experts:
1. Er. T.N.Chaturvedi,
Professional & Chartered Engineer
2. Er. R.K.Bajaj,
Environmental Engineer
C. Data Analysis & DTP
1. Mr. T.Wilson, Data Analyst & DTP, DAS India.
2. Mr. R.K.Bajpai, Data Entry Operator, UPPCB .
Contd...
2
The Study Team
(… contd.)
Our gratitude to:
Sri Pradeep Kumar
The then Principal Secretary Environment and
Chairman UP Pollution Control Board
For conceiving and designing the study and for his
inspiring leadership and guidance.
Excise Department
Govt. of Uttar Pradesh.
For providing valuable data
Senior Officers of the U.P. Pollution Control Board
For their valuable inputs.
3
EVOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATION
• FIRST WAVE – THE TRADITIONAL REGULATORY APPROACH
• SECOND WAVE – MARKET BASED INSTRUMENTS
- POLLUTION CHARGES
- PRODUCT CHARGES
- USER FEE
- PERFORMANCE BONDS
- LIABILITY PAYMENTS
- NON COMPLIANCE FEES
- DEPOSIT REFUND SCHEME
- TRADEABLE PERMITS
• THIRD WAVE – PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
4
BENEFITS OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
• CREATION OF MARKET OPPORTUNITIES
• IMPROVEMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
• INCREASED CONFIDENCE OF INVESTORS, INSURERS AND
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
• IMPROVED RELATIONSHIP WITH LOCAL COMMUNITIES,
REGULATORS AND NON GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIIONS
•GREATER CONTROL OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE
•INCREASED STAFF COMMITTMENT
5
PRACTICED AS
• Involuntary – Media Exposures, Notices, PIL Etc.
• Mandatory – The Regulatory Mechanism like consents
• Voluntary – Press Release, Public Reports Etc.
DRIVERS
• Transparency
- Society Wants To Be Told What Is Going On
• Accountability
- Fear Of Losing Significant Economic Value Of
Good Corporate Reputation
• Synergy Between Economic And Environmental
Performance
6
ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION
• THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION )
ACT, 1974 AS AMENDED IN 1988.
• THE WATER ( PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION)
CESS ACT, 1977 AS AMENDED IN 1991.
• THE AIR (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) ACT,
1981 AS AMENDED IN 1987.
• THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986
• THE PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE ACT, 1991
• THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL TRIBUNAL ACT, 1995
• THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT,
1997
• NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY ACT, 2002
7
•INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM
- CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
- STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDS
• INCENTIVES / DISINCENTIVES
- FINES
- BANK GUARANTEES
- CESS REBATE
- CONSENT VALIDITY
- LOCATION
- CLOSURES
- PROSECUTION
8
Environmental Performance Rating
A Pioneering Initiative



U.P. Pollution Control Board, in a pioneering
initiative is making efforts to change the paradigm of
the way Pollution Control is commonly understood.
Dispel the notion that, Pollution Control is an end of
process, cost-intensive, loss-making effort.
Rather, environmental management and pollution
control means harmonizing resources, process and
outputs.
9
Objectives of this Study


To place a Mirror before the industry in the
form of Environmental Performance Rating
to make them aware about their strengths
and weaknesses as also the opportunities &
threats, so as to enable self-correction and
continual improvement in their
environmental performance.
To encourage pro-active role by the Industry
to improve its Environmental Performance
through benchmarking.
10
Significance of Alcohol Industry




Downstream unit of Sugar Industry- Synergy with
Sugar & Paper
Utilising wastes (Molasses) to produce Alcohol, an
essential input of the Chemical & Pharmaceutical
Industry and a product for human consumption.
Alcohol – great potential for use as Fuel for
automobiles – GASOHOL.
But, also known for discharging highly polluted
effluents and is included in ‘Schedule-1’ of Water
Cess Act. An EIA is a pre-requisite before setting up
of any unit or expansion thereof.
(Contd…….)
11
Significance of Alcohol Industry
(…. Contd.)

Significance in U.P.




Alongwith sugar, the largest value enhancer to
agricultural produce.
Contributes a significant part of State GDP – next
only to Trade Tax.
Major catalyst of Employment in the Primary &
Secondary Sectors.
Unfortunately, also amongst the most polluting
industries.

Over 10 MT of BOD load per day into the river
systems of the State.
12
Alcohol Industry in Uttar Pradesh
and Uttaranchal – a profile

No. of Distilleries in U.P. & Uttaranchal
- 43

No. of Operational Distilleries
- 37

No. of Molasses Based Distilleries
- 35

No. of Grain Based Distilleries
- 02
Units not operated in 2000-01
Total Annual Production Capacity
- 02
of the Operational Distilleries
- 6,79,777 KL
Alcohol Production during 2000-01
- 4,32,489 KL



13
Analytical Framework and
Methodology


The basic hypothesis for this environmental
performance rating exercise has been:
 Optimal resource utilisation and improved
production processes are likely to result in better
environmental performance.
 Minimal but conscious efforts can result in
achieving the environmental norms.
Therefore, the framework of the rating has three axes:
 Plant performance
 Regulatory compliance &
 Environmental initiatives
(Contd…...)
14
Analytical Framework and
Methodology
( …. Contd.)

The study is based on data obtained from –

The industry
Excise Department

U.P. Pollution Control Board


The study is diachronic & covers a span of three (3)
years:

1998-99, 1999-2000 & 2000-01 and includes trend
of Performance
(Contd…...)
15
Analytical Framework and
Methodology
(…….Contd.)






Evaluation parameters identified.
Basic data obtained from Industry on a customized
questionnaire.
The Data received analyzed and clarifications obtained
from the units, as required.
Consultants’ team visited Eight (8) Distillery units,
selected on geographical location and size, to verify
credibility of the reported data on a sample basis.
Feedback taken from Senior Technical officers of UPPCB,
during a series of presentations.
Authentication of the data, considered for calculating the
environmental parameters, obtained from the top
management of the distillery units.
(Contd…...)
16
Analytical Framework and
Methodology (…….Contd.)


Environmental parameters calculated for various
units from the authenticated data obtained.
Latest (2000-01) performance & Trend analyzed.




The two grain based units separately analyzed.
Two (2) molasses-based units- one started in 2000-01 and
the other not worked during the year 2000-01, excluded.
Draft Report prepared and presented to the industry
in an “Open-house (05.02.02)” for feedback, after
which the final report with ratings, prepared.
Individual units informed about their environmental
performance scores as well as the potential for cost
savings through improvement - “Action Plans
requested”
17
The Environmental Performance
Criteria & Weightages

Plant Level Performance (40%)



% utilization of installed production capacity (2+1)
Raw Material, MT per KL Alcohol(5+1)
Alcohol Recovery, Ltrs. Per MT TRS (3+1)

Water Consumption, KL per KL Alcohol(10+1)
Total Energy, GJ per KL Alcohol(4+1)
% Renewable out of the Total Energy(4+1)

Net External Energy, GJ per KL Alcohol(5+1)


(Contd…..)
18
The Environmental Performance
Criteria & Weightages (……Contd.)

Regulatory Compliance Status (5%)

‘Consent’ – Water (2000) obtained from UPPCB
(5 for yes, 0 for no)

‘Marginal’/’Heavy’ Default (without dilution)
- UPPCB’ internal norms
- Negative Marking (Heavy –5; marginal –2)
(Contd…..)
19
The Environmental Performance
Criteria & Weightages (……Contd.)

Corporate & Environmental Management
Aspects (55%)

ISO 14001 E M S (10 for yes; 0 for no)

Completeness of ETP(10)

Effluent Disposal Practice - Stream/Land or
Conversion into Bio-compost (10)

Spent Wash generated, KL per KL Alcohol(10)

Biogas generation, Nm3 per KL Spent Wash(15)

Dilution Factor (-10)
20
Environmental Performance Evaluation
Plant Level Performance
Capacity Utilisation
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
2.90%
105.15%
64.56%
73.50
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 19
Capacity Utilisation,%
9
8
8
7
7
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
6
6
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
1
0
2.90 - 15.68 15.68 - 28.46 28.46 - 41.24 41.24 - 54.03 54.03 - 66.81 66.81 - 79.59 79.59 - 92.37
Range
92.37 105.15
21
Plant Level Performance
Capacity Utilisation – The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery
1
2
3
4
5
Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli,
Muzaffarnagar
Rampur Distillery, Rampur
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli,
Ghaziabad
Shadilal Distly. & Chem. Works,
Muzaffarnagar
Performance Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend)
Value (%)
100.30
2.994
103.82
105.15
92.25
2.924
2.897
2.845
90.40
2.808
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery
29
30
31
32
33
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur,
U.S.Nagar
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj,
Farrukhbad
Performance Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend)
Value (%)
46.74
0.935
46.52
0.930
39.94
0.799
34.96
0.699
02.90
0.058
22
Plant Level Performance
Molasses Consumption, MT/KL Alcohol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
4.53
6.28
4.97
4.97
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 14
Molasses, MT /KL Alcohol
12
10
10
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
10
9
8
6
4
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
4.53 - 4.75 4.75 - 4.97 4.97 - 5.19 5.19 - 5.40 5.40 - 5.62 5.62 - 5.84 5.84 - 6.06 6.06 - 6.28
Range
23
Plant Level Performance
Molasses Consumption - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri
UP State Sugar Coop. Fed. Ltd. Nanauta,
Saharanpur
Kisan Sahakari hini Mills Ltd. (Distly.),
Ghosi, Mau
Performance Weighted Score
Value (MT/KL) (Performance + Trend)
4.63
4.571
4.53
3.984
4.57
3.817
4.62
3.596
4.63
3.543
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
29
30
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda
31
32
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj,
Farrukhbad
33
Performance Weighted Score
Value (MT/KL) (Performance + Trend)
5.16
1.204
5.39
0.208
5.59
6.03
0.000
0.000
6.28
0.000
24
Plant Level Performance
Recovery of Alcohol in Ltrs./MT. TRS
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
379.40
536.78
463.73
467.93
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 13
Alcohol Recovery,Ltrs. /MT TRS Content
20
18
18
16
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
14
12
10
8
6
4
4
2
4
2
1
2
1
1
497.43 517.11
517.11 536.78
0
379.40 399.08
399.08 418.75
418.75 438.42
438.42 458.09
458.09 477.76
Range
477.76 497.43
25
Plant Level Performance
Recovery of Alcohol - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
1
Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola,
Pilibhit
Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur
Rampur Distillery, Rampur
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri
India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar
2
3
4
5
Performance
Weighted Score
Value (Ltrs./MT) (Performance + Trend)
536.78
3.372
509.28
490.27
483.94
1.989
1.724
1.635
482.36
1.613
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
29
30
31
32
33
Name of Distillery
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd,
Meerut Cantt.
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd.,
Kayamganj, Farrukhbad
Performance
Weighted Score
Value (Ltrs./MT) (Performance + Trend)
435.73
0.963
427.44
0.847
402.61
0.501
387.88
0.295
379.40
0.177
26
Plant Level Performance
Water Consumption, KL / KL Alcohol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
14.69
512.88
125.22
94.75
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 20
Water Consumption,KL /KL Alcohol
16
14
14
12
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
10
10
8
6
4
4
3
2
1
1
0
0
326.06 388.33
388.33 450.61
0
14.69 - 76.96
76.96 - 139.24
139.24 201.51
201.51 263.79
263.79 326.06
450.61 512.88
Range
27
Plant Level Performance
Water Consumption- The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly,
Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar
India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar,
Ghaziabad
Performance Weighted Score
Value (KL/KL) (Performance + Trend)
14.69
8.027
32.61
7.454
31.99
48.27
52.11
6.508
6.079
5.742
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
29
30
31
32
33
Name of Distillery
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Performance Weighted Score
Value (KL/KL) (Performance + Trend)
205.50
0.000
206.08
0.000
237.84
0.000
283.79
0.000
512.88
0.000
28
Plant Level Performance
Total Energy Consumption in GJ/KL Alcohol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
10.17
123.56
26.04
18.32
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 18
Total Energy Consumption, GJ /KL Alcohol
25
23
20
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
15
10
6
5
1
1
38.51 52.69
52.69 66.86
0
1
0
1
0
10.17 24.34
24.34 38.51
66.86 81.04
81.04 95.21
95.21 109.38
109.38 123.56
Range
29
Plant Level Performance
Total Energy Consumption - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly,
Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
Performance Weighted Score
Value (GJ/KL) (Performance + Trend)
11.98
3.757
13.33
3.424
13.37
10.17
3.414
3.201
15.18
2.971
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
29
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
30
31
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar,
Ghaziabad
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur,
U.S.Nagar
32
33
Performance Weighted Score
Value (GJ/KL) (Performance + Trend)
26.70
0.000
31.25
31.56
0.000
0.000
56.02
0.000
81.19
0.000
30
Plant Level Performance
Total Renewable Energy % of Total Energy
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
7.92
100.00
79.51
93.42
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 17
Renewable Energy %
25
20
20
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
15
10
5
5
2
2
1
2
0
1
0
7.92 19.43
19.43 30.94
30.94 42.45
42.45 53.96
53.96 65.47
65.47 76.98
76.98 88.49
88.49 100.00
Range
31
Plant Level Performance
Total Renewable Energy- The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula
Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri
Performance Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend)
Value (%)
100.00
4.999
100.00
4.999
100.00
4.999
96.23
99.66
4.312
3.936
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
29
30
31
32
33
Name of Distillery
Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, Gorakhpur
Lords Distillery Ltd., Nandganj, Ghazipur
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Performance Weighted Score
(Performance + Trend)
Value (%)
77.86
0.000
76.74
0.000
52.20
0.000
25.59
11.31
0.000
0.000
32
Plant Level Performance
Net External Energy in GJ / KL Alcohol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
0.00
123.56
17.70
9.44
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 21
External Energy Consumption,GJ / KL Alcohol
25
22
20
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
15
10
8
5
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0.00 15.44
15.44 30.89
30.89 46.33
46.33 61.78
61.78 77.22
77.22 92.67
92.67 108.11
108.11 123.56
Range
33
Plant Level Performance
Net External Energy - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula
Rampur Distillery, Rampur
Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli,
Muzaffarnagar
KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar,
Faizabad
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly,
Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
Performance Weighted Score
Value (GJ/KL) (Performance + Trend)
0.00
6.000
3.26
4.01
4.963
4.725
4.05
4.713
1.13
4.641
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank Name of Distillery
29
30
31
32
33
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj,
Farrukhbad
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur,
U.S.Nagar
Performance Weighted Score
Value (GJ/KL) (Performance + Trend)
17.63
0.000
19.69
0.000
22.08
0.000
49.68
0.000
81.19
0.000
34
Regulatory Compliance
Consent Water
Consent Granted
Consent Not Granted -
17
16
Grain
Based
02
-
Water Consent
No. of Units
•
•
Molasses
Based
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
19
16
Granted
Not Granted
35
Regulatory Compliance
Default Status (without dilution)
Heavy Default
Marginal Default
Zero Discharge
-
22
11
02
Default Status (without dillution)
No. of Units
•
•
•
25
22
20
15
11
10
5
2
0
Heavy Default
Marginal Default Zero Discharge
36
Environmental Management
 ISO 14001/EMS not granted to any Unit
 Completeness of ETP
•
In 2 Units, Primary (Biogas generation) stage
not functional. In other 3 units, biogas not
monitored & not consumed.
•
16 Units do not have the Second Aerobic Stage
of the Secondary Treatment
•
2 Units are converting the entire effluent into
Bio-manure
•
8 Units have started partly converting the
effluent into Bio-manure
37
Environmental Management
Spent Wash Generation in KL/KL Alcohol
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
10.87
38.34
15.48
14.92
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 16
Spent Wash,KL / KL Alcohol
18
16
16
14
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
13
12
10
8
6
4
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
21.17 24.61
24.61 28.04
28.04 31.47
31.47 34.90
0
10.87 14.31
14.31 17.74
17.74 21.17
34.90 38.34
Range
38
Environmental Management
Spent Wash Generation - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar,
Faizabad
Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur
Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.),
Seohara, Bijnor
Performance
Value (KL/KL)
10.87
Weighted
Score
7.995
11.36
11.93
7.517
6.948
12.65
12.66
6.242
6.233
Performance
Value (KL/KL)
16.13
16.82
19.34
Weighted
Score
2.800
2.119
0.000
20.58
38.34
0.000
0.000
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
28
29
30
UPCSFF Ltd, Anoopshahar, Bulandshahar
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow
Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur,
U.S.Nagar
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
31
32
39
Environmental Management
Biogas Generation in Nm3 /KL Spent Wash
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
7.26
54.30
32.31
32.38
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 16
Biogas, Nm 3 / KL Spent Wash
10
9
9
8
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
7
6
6
5
4
3
3
3
2
2
1
1
7.26 13.14
13.14 19.02
1
1
0
19.02 24.90
24.90 30.78
30.78 36.66
36.66 42.54
42.54 48.42
48.42 54.30
Range
40
Environmental Management
Biogas Generation - The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Distillery
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar
Oudh Sugar Mills (Distly.) Hargaon
Rampur Distillery, Rampur
Performance
Value (Nm3/KL)
54.30
Weighted
Score
12.001
48.60
47.48
45.49
43.81
10.598
10.321
9.830
9.416
The Bottom Five (5) units, excluding those not having biogas generation
facilities are:
Rank
22
23
24
25
26
Name of Distillery
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath,
Kheri
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola,
Pilibhit
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
Performance
Value (Nm3/KL)
23.73
Weighted
Score
4.469
23.31
4.365
23.04
18.95
4.298
3.291
07.26
0.408
41
Environmental Management
Dilution Ratio – KL Water/KL Treated Effluent
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
0.31
44.81
7.88
5.50
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 18
Dilution Ratio
16
14
14
13
12
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
10
8
6
4
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
22.56 28.12
28.12 33.69
33.69 39.25
0
0.31 - 5.87
5.87 11.44
11.44 17.00
17.00 22.56
39.25 44.81
Range
42
Environmental Management
Dilution Ratio – The Top & Bottom Five Units
The Top Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
1
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics),
Gajraula
Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli,
Ghaziabad
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad
2
3
4
5
Performance
Value
0.31
Weighted
Score
0.000
1.18
1.49
-2.000
-2.000
1.51
1.62
-2.000
-2.000
Performance
Value
11.86
Weighted
Score
-10.000
The Bottom Five (5) units are:
Rank
Name of Distillery
28
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
29
30
Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala,
Meerut
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
14.59
18.24
-10.000
-10.000
19.50
-10.000
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut
Cantt.
44.81
-10.000
31
32
43
Overall Environmental Performance
(Molasses Based Units)
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Mode
-
-1.82
54.15
25.27
26.17
No. of Units with negative
performance compared to modal
value – 18
Overall Environmental Performance
No. of Units
•
•
•
•
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
9
5
5
5
3
-1.82 6.18
Mode - 26.17
Average - 25.27
6.18 14.17
14.17 22.17
22.17 30.16
30.16 38.16
3
3
38.16 46.16
46.16 54.15
Range
44
Conclusion
1. Regional Comparison of Environmental Performance
No. of Units
06
07
17
03
Performance Avg.
23.55
25.61
26.47
21.14
Regional Comparision of Environmental Performance
30.00
26.47
25.61
25.00
23.55
21.14
20.00
15.00
3 Units
17 Units
5.00
7 Units
10.00
6 Units
Env ironme ntal Pe rformance
(Av e rage )
Region
Eastern
Central
Western
Uttaranchal
0.00
Eastern
Central
Western
Uttaranchal
Region
45
2. River Catchment-wise – No. of Distilleries
River Catchment
Ghagra
Gomti
Ganga
Yamuna
Units
06
03
20
06
Discharging
to River
05
01
18
06
Land disposal/
Bio-Composting
01
02
02
-
(Including 2 Grain Based distilleries)
River Catchmentwise Comparision - No. of Distilleries
25
20
18
No. of Units
20
15
10
6
6
5
5
6
3
1
0
Ghagra
Gom ti
Ganga
Yam una
Total no. of Distlry.
No. discharging to River
River Catchment
46
3. Locational Comparison of Environmental Performance
Location
Rural
Semi Urban
Urban
No. of Units
23
02
08
Performance Avg.
24.90
29.97
25.18
Locational Comparision of Environmental Performance
(Molasses Based Units)
29.97
30.00
25.18
24.90
25.00
20.00
8 Units
10.00
2 Units
15.00
23 Units
Environmental Performance
(Average)
35.00
5.00
0.00
Rural
Semi-Urban
Urban
Location
47
5. Environmental Performance vs Gross Profit
Gross Profit is directly proportional to Environmental
Performance. (Available data for 14 units)
Better the Environmental Performance, higher is the
Profitability.
Gross Profit/KL Alcohol vs Environmental Performance
(Molasses Based Units)
5000
Gross Profit/Unit
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Environmental Performance
48
6. Better Environmental Performance of Grain Based
Distilleries
•
The environmental performance of Grain
Based is better in comparison to molasses
based distilleries
•
Even Though their energy requirements are
much higher.
•
Notably, there is no recognition for IMFL as
Whisky by WTO.
49
Savings’ Potential in the overall industry
through improved environmental
performance
• Potential for annual cost savings on
achieving industry-best performance value:
• Molasses Consumption : Rs. 26.95 Crores
• Water Consumption
:
Rs. 12.04 Crores
• Biogas Utilization
:
Rs. 22.50 Crores
• Reduction in Total
Energy Consumption
:
Rs. 45.32 Crores
50
Recommendations
1. Serious thinking required in respect of the bottom
five (5) units having alarmingly poor environmental
performance with the consequent adverse
environmental impacts.
2. Mandatory installation of Primary (Biogas) stage of
effluent treatment in all the molasses-based plants
to generate & utilize biogas as also its close
monitoring and control. Retrofitting or replacement
of inefficient plants to be carried out to achieve best
performance.
3. Ensuring two stage aerobic treatment in Secondary
stage of the Effluent Treatment Plant in all
molasses-based units discharging into stream or
land.
(Contd ……) 51
Recommendations
4. Minimizing water consumption by maximum
recycling and reuse.
5. Installation of metering systems at identified
locations for monitoring the consumption of
Biogas, Water, Electricity & fuel.
6. Conversion of Spent Wash into bio-manure or
cattle feed to be preferred disposal practice.
7. Energy Conservation training programs and
periodic energy audits to identify and eliminate
energy wastage and reduce energy consumption.
(Contd ……)
52
Recommendation
(…….Contd.)
8. Maximum utilization of the treated effluent for
irrigation, where bio-composting is not feasible.
9. Adoption of the best available technologies in the
following areas,
• Fermentation
• Distillation
• Co-generation of steam/power
• Effluent Treatment
10. Upgradation of the Management through the
implementation of :
•
•
ISO 14001 Environmental Management System
ISO 9001 Quality Management System
53
Overall Environmental Performance Rating
(Molasses Based Units)
Sl.
Name of Distillery
Total Score
(Max. Marks - 100)
1
Jubliant Organosys Ltd. (VAM Organics), Gajraula
54.153
2
Simbhaoli Sugar Mills Ltd., Distlly, Simbhaoli, Ghaziabad
50.667
3
India Glycols Ltd., Kashipur, U.S.Nagar
47.981
4
Rampur Distillery, Rampur
39.460
5
Somaiya Organics Ltd, Kushinagar
39.349
6
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., Gola Gokaran Nath, Kheri
38.758
7
DSM Mills Ltd, (Distly.), Dhampur, Bijnor
37.523
8
Oudh Sugar Mills (Distly.), Hargaon
36.659
9
UDBL, Shekhpur, Unnao
36.278
10
Pilkhani Distly. & Chemical Works, Pilkhani, Dehradun
35.182
11
Shamli Distly. & Chem. Works, Shamli, Muzaffarnagar
31.163
Contd …..
54
Overall Environmental Performance Rating
(Molasses Based Units)
Sl.
Name of Distillery
…… Contd.
Total Score
(Max. Marks - 100)
12
Balrampur Chini Mills, Balrampur
29.728
13
Upper Ganges Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Seohara Bijnor
28.151
14
Shadilal Distly. & Chem. Works, Muzaffarnagar
27.620
15
Lords Distillery Ltd., Nandganj, Ghazipur
27.444
16
KM Sugar Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Motinagar, Faizabad
26.070
17
Saraiya Distilleries, Sardarnagar, GKP
24.731
18
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad
24.528
19
Narang Industries, Nawabgunj, Gonda
23.943
20
Kesar Enterprises Ltd, Baheri, Bareilly
23.665
21
National Industrial Corp. Ltd., Raja-Ka-Sahaspur, Moradabad
22.120
22
Daurala Sugar Works (Distly.), Daurala, Meerut
21.858
Contd …..
55
Overall Environmental Performance Rating
(Molasses Based Units)
…… Contd.
Sl.
Name of Distillery
Total Score
(Max. Marks - 100)
23
Majhola Distly. & Chem. Works, Majhola, Pilibhit
18.258
24
Doon Valley Distly., Kuanwala, Dehradun
17.266
25
Mohan Meakins Ltd, Lucknow
16.049
26
SKS Chini Mills (Distly.), Nanpara, Bahraich
13.798
27
Central Distilleries & Breweries Ltd, Meerut Cantt.
13.124
28
Modi Distly. Modinagar, Ghaziabad
10.208
29
UPCSFF Ltd, Anoopshahar, Bulandshahar
8.445
30
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd. (Distly.), Ghosi, Mau
6.257
31
UP State Sugar Coop. Fed. Ltd. Nanauta, Saharanpur
3.845
32
Kisan Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd., Kayamganj, Farrukhbad
1.514
33
Bajpur Coop. Sugar Factory, Bajpur, U.S.Nagar
-1.820
56
PILOT PROGRAMME FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
PERFORMANCE
RATING
AND
PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE FOR INDUSTRIES
• PART OF WORLD BANK PROGRAMME
• SIMILAR IN DESIGN PRINCIPLES TO STUDIES IN
INDONESIA, CHINA AND PHILIPINES
• COLLECTIVE EFFORT OF CII, WORLD BANK AND
THE U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD.
57
• INITIATED IN MAY 2001
• COVERED 33 INDUSTRIES OF DIFFERENT SIZES AND
DIFFERENT SECTORS AT GHAZIABAD AND NOIDA
• CLASSIFIED BLACK, RED (IMPLYING LACK OF
COMPLIANCE) AND BLUE GREEN AND GOLD
(LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE MEETING EXISTING
STANDARDS)
• 6 RATED GOLD AND GREEN
• 16 RATED BLUE
• 11 RATED BLACK AND RED
58
PILOT INCLUDES
• LOCATION SPECIFIC PROGRAMME
• INCLUDES SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE ALSO
• INVOLVES A YES / NO
• COMPLIANCE RATING AS AGAINST PERFORMANCE
RATING
59
FUTURE OUTLOOK
• DATA ACQUISITION SUCCESSFUL ONLY IF ASSISTED
BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
• SEPARATE IDENTITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL RATING
PROGRAM
• INVOLVEMENT OF A MULTI STAKEHOLDER PANEL FOR
RATING VERIFICATION AND OVERSEEING THE RATING
PROCESS IS MUST
• INVOLVEMENT OF TECHNICAL EXPERTS
• INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL BACKING FOR THE PROJECT
• PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE DATA GENERATED BY THE
RATING PROCESS
• COMPLETE COOPERATION OF SPCB IS MUST.
60
CHARTER
FOR
RESPONSIBILITY 2003
CORPORATE
BANK GUARANTEE AND ACTION PLAN TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY OR COMBINATION OF
FOLLOWING MEASURES
•COMPOST MAKING WITH
RESIDUE/MUNICIPAL WASTE
PRESS
MUD/AGRICULTURAL
•CONCENTRATION AND DRYING / INCINERATION
•BIOMETHANATION, TWO STAGE SECONDARY TREATMENT
AND DILUTION WITH PROCESS WATER FOR USE OF EFFLUENTS
IN IRRIGATION
•BIOMETHANATION,
SECONDARY
CONTROLLED DISCHARGE INTO SEA.
TREATMENT
AND
•ONE TIME CONTROLLED APPLICATION ON LAND. STUDY IN
THREE MONTHS.
61
ROAD MAP FOR ACHIEVING ZERO DISCHARGE IN
INLAND SURFACE WATERS
• 50 % UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY MARCH 2004
• 75% UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY MARCH 2005
• 100 % UTILIZATION OF SPENT WASH BY DECEMBER 2005
NEW DISTILLERIES AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING
DISTILLERIES
• NEW STAND ALONE DISTILLERIES AND EXPANSION OF
EXISTING
DISTILLERIES
WITHOUT
ACHIEVING
ZERO
DISCHARGE IN SURFACE/GROUND WATER NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED
62
THANK YOU
63