Quantifying the productivity counterpart of outsourcing in the Italian manufacturing industries F. Daveri - M. Iommi - C. Jona-Lasinio OECD Productivity Workshop Bern, 16-18 October, 2006 Motivation Growing importance of international “outsourcing” of services in Western economies. Evidence that both offshoring of services and of material inputs are associated with productivity gains Amiti and Wei, 2006; Girma and Gorg, 2004; Criscuolo and Leaver, 2005. Outsourcing as such, irrespective of where to, should be associated to productivity growth Italy was largely missing from previous research on this topic. Availability of new symmetric I-O tables. Bern – October 18, 2006 Our aims Quantify the extent of domestic and international outsourcing in the Italian manufacturing sector. Provide a comparison between direct and indirect measures of outsourcing. Evaluate the productivity counterpart of outsourcing. Bern – October 18, 2006 Data Symmetric input-output tables (industry by industry matrix) At the 60-sector level (according to the NACE Rev1.1 classification) Time period: 1995-2003 Focus on domestic and international outsourcing of manufacturing intermediates and services for 14 manufacturing industries Our – broad - definition of “market service providers”: transports, storage and communications finance and insurance real estate and other business services Bern – October 18, 2006 LP in manufacturing: abrupt but scattered slowdown (ND first, then D) 1970-80 198095 199503 199500 2000-03 Manufacturing 2.8 3.0 0.2 1.0 -1.0 Non-durables 2.7 3.1 0.3 0.7 -0.2 Durables 2.9 2.7 0.0 1.7 -2.7 Bern – October 18, 2006 TFP in manufacturing: same pattern as LP 1970-80 198095 199503 199500 2000-03 Manufacturing - 1.6 -0.5 0.3 -1.7 Non-durables - 1.8 -0.5 -0.2 -1.0 Durables - 1.2 -0.5 1.3 -3.4 Bern – October 18, 2006 Measures of international and domestic outsourcing OSMiD= Sj [DOMESTIC INPUT PURCHASES OF MATERIAL j by IND. i / TOTAL NON-ENERGY INPUTS USED BY INDUSTRY i] D OSSi = Sj [DOMESTIC PURCHASES OF SERVICE INPUT j by INDST. i / TOTAL NON-ENERGY INPUTS USED BY INDUSTRY i] OSMiF= Sj [IMPORT OF MATERIAL j by INDST. i / TOTAL NON-ENERGY INPUTS USED BY INDUSTRY i] OSSiF= Sj [IMPORT OF SERVICE INPUT j by INDST. i / TOTAL NON-ENERGY INPUTS USED BY INDUSTRY i] Bern – October 18, 2006 Domestic outsourcing of intermediates (OSMD): down in 1995-03 Table 1: Domestic outsourcing of intermediate products in Italy’s manufacturing industries % points 1995 1999 2003 (1995-99) (1999-03) (1995-03) Food products and tobacco 26.8 26.1 25.6 -0.7 -0.5 -1.1 Textiles and clothing 53.1 49.0 43.8 -4.2 -5.2 -9.3 Leather and footwear 54.3 52.4 49.5 -1.9 -2.9 -4.8 Wood and wood products 52.9 52.8 50.6 -0.1 -2.2 -2.3 Paper, printing and publishing 37.5 36.3 33.9 -1.2 -2.4 -3.5 Coke and refined petroleum products 22.2 21.7 14.7 -0.5 -6.9 -7.5 Chemicals and chemical products 32.9 33.2 24.5 0.2 -8.7 -8.5 Rubber and plastic products 39.8 39.9 36.0 0.2 -3.9 -3.8 Other non-metallic mineral products 39.2 37.1 37.4 -2.1 0.3 -1.8 Basic metals and fabricated metal products 45.7 44.3 43.3 -1.4 -1.0 -2.4 Machinery and equipment n.e.c. 55.7 53.3 51.5 -2.4 -1.7 -4.2 Electrical and optical equipment 32.9 31.3 29.0 -1.6 -2.3 -3.9 Transport equipment 47.6 43.8 40.9 -3.8 -2.9 -6.7 Other mnfg. industries 45.5 47.2 44.7 1.7 -2.5 -0.8 Average manufacturing industry 41.9 40.6 37.5 -1.3 -3.1 -4.3 Bern – October 18, 2006 Source: own calculation from ISTAT – National Accounts F Int’n’l outsourcing of intermediates (OSM ): up in 1995-03 Table 2: International outsourcing of intermediates in Italy’s manufacturing industries 1995 1999 2003 (1995-99) (1999-03) (1995-03) Food products and tobacco 8.5 8.5 9.3 0.0 0.8 0.8 Textiles and clothing 17.3 17.7 20.9 0.4 3.2 3.6 Leather and footwear 16.2 16.2 20.4 0.0 4.1 4.1 Wood and wood products 15.0 13.9 14.7 -1.1 0.8 -0.3 Paper, printing and publishing 21.5 18.2 18.0 -3.4 -0.1 -3.5 Coke and refined petroleum products 29.5 16.1 32.5 -13.5 16.4 2.9 Chemicals and chemical products 40.9 38.3 44.5 -2.5 6.1 3.6 Rubber and plastic products 29.9 27.3 29.1 -2.7 1.8 -0.8 Other non-metallic mineral products 11.9 10.6 10.0 -1.3 -0.6 -1.9 Basic metals and fabricated metal products 23.6 21.2 20.9 -2.4 -0.3 -2.7 Machinery and equipment n.e.c. 14.1 14.4 15.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 Electrical and optical equipment 32.3 30.5 31.0 -1.8 0.5 -1.4 Transport equipment 24.5 26.9 29.3 2.4 2.4 4.8 Other mnfg. industries 22.2 18.5 21.1 -3.7 2.6 -1.1 Average manufacturing industry 22.0 19.9 22.6 -2.1 +2.7 0.7 Source: own Bern – calculation October from 18, ISTAT 2006 - National Accounts D Domestic outsourcing of services (OSS ): up in 1995-03 Table 3: Domestic outsourcing of market services in Italy’s manufacturing industries 1995 1999 2003 (1995-99) (1999-03) (1995-03) Food products and tobacco 9.8 11.8 14.0 2.0 2.3 4.2 Textiles and clothing 11.2 13.4 15.4 2.2 2.0 4.2 Leather and footwear 12.4 13.6 13.2 1.1 -0.4 0.8 Wood and wood products 14.6 15.8 18.0 1.2 2.2 3.4 Paper, printing and publishing 17.8 20.1 21.9 2.3 1.9 4.1 Coke and refined petroleum products 18.4 30.1 26.3 11.7 -3.8 7.9 Chemicals and chemical products 10.9 12.4 14.3 1.5 1.9 3.4 Rubber and plastic products 13.9 15.9 18.2 2.0 2.3 4.3 Other non-metallic mineral products 20.4 21.8 23.0 1.3 1.2 2.6 Basic metals and fabricated metal products 14.7 18.0 19.0 3.4 0.9 4.3 Machinery and equipment n.e.c. 13.9 15.9 16.8 2.0 0.9 2.8 Electrical and optical equipment 12.5 14.3 14.7 1.8 0.4 2.2 Transport equipment 12.3 13.4 13.5 1.1 0.1 1.2 Other mnfg. industries 14.4 15.8 16.4 1.3 0.6 2.0 Average manufacturing industry 14.1 16.6 17.5 +2.5 +0.9 +3.4 Source: own from ISTAT Bern – calculation October 18, 2006 - National Accounts F Int’n’l outsourcing of services (OSS ): mildly up in 1995-03 Table 4: International outsourcing of market services in Italy’s manufacturing industries 1995 1999 2003 (1995-99) (1999-03) (1995-03) Food products and tobacco 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 Textiles and clothing 1.0 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 Leather and footwear 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 Wood and wood products 1.5 1.5 1.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 Paper, printing and publishing 1.5 1.5 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 Coke and refined petroleum products 3.4 5.8 5.6 2.4 -0.2 2.2 Chemicals and chemical products 1.8 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 Rubber and plastic products 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Other non-metallic mineral products 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 -0.1 Basic metals and fabricated metal products 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 Machinery and equipment n.e.c. 1.2 1.2 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 Electrical and optical equipment 3.7 4.8 5.3 1.1 0.5 1.6 Transport equipment 1.5 1.8 1.6 0.3 -0.2 0.1 Other mnfg. industries 1.5 1.6 1.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 Average manufacturing industry 1.5 1.8 1.9 +0.3 +0.1 +0.4 Source: own from ISTAT Bern – calculation October 18, 2006 - National Accounts DIJ vs FH measures FH measure imputes average propensity to import for the economy to each industry – unwarranted assumption justifed by data limitations We have the right data to directly compute offshoring FH and DIJ measures are highly correlated: Across industries r is 0.8 on average 1995-03 (but falls to .6 in 1999-03) FH shares systematically lower than DIJ shares Feenstra-Hanson measures systematically “optimistic” in evaluating extent of offshoring Use of indirect outsourcing measures may bias estimates Bern – October 18, 2006 Empirical specification GROWTHLPit GROWTHKL it aI i bTt md OSM d it sd OSS d it mf OSM f it sf OSS f it where: GROWTHLPit is the growth rate of value added per full-time equivalent employed worker in industry i (with i=1,..14) at time t (with t=1995,..,2003); GROWTHKLit is the growth rate of the industry capital labor ratios; OSS is the outsourcing of services; OSM is the outsourcing of intermediates “d” and “f ” mean “domestic” and “foreign” Bern – October 18, 2006 eit Empirical results Table 5: Outsourcing and productivity growth in the Italian manufacturing industries Dependent variable: yearly growth rate of value added per full-time equivalent employed (14 industries, 1995-03) WLS OLS WLS OLS WLS OLS WLS OLS WLS OLS WLS WLS Our Osm, Oss Our Osm, Oss Feenstra Hanson Osm Feenstra Hanson Osm Lagged Osm, Oss Lagged Osm, Oss Lagged Feenstra Hanson Lagged Feenstra Hanson Our Osm, Oss Our Osm, Oss FeenstraHanson Lagged Osm, Oss Growth of capital labor ratio .39*** (.11) .45*** (.13) .36*** (.12) .45*** (.15) .31** (.13) .44** (.17) .36** (.17) .38** (.17) .43*** (.13) .65*** (.16) .41*** (.13) .30** (.14) (OSM foreign) -.18*** (.05) -.27*** (.04) -.25*** (.10) -.40*** (.08) .10** (.05) .11** (.05) -.19** (.10) -.16 (.10) (OSS foreign) .03 (.03) -.03 (.04) .25** (.11) .39*** (.11) -.02 (.04) -.02 (.05) .11** (.04) .09** (.04) (OSM domestic) .09 (.07) .00 (.06) .27*** (.07) .23*** (.06) -.08 (.09) -.04 (.08) -.12 (.09) -.11 (.08) (OSS domestic) -.32*** (.10) -.56*** (.11) -.54*** (.18) -.89*** (.18) .06 (.13) .02 (.14) -.14 (.16) -.15 (.18) R&D*OSMint’n’l .06 (.08) .02 (.10) .01 (.09) .02 (.09) R&D*OSSint’n’l .00 (.02) -.00 (.02) .02 (.11) -.01 (.02) R&D*OSMdom .20** (.10) .20 (.14) 16** (.07) -.08 (.11) R&D*OSSdom -.00 (.09) -.02 (.12) -.04 (.12) .09 (.10) Interaction terms Adjusted RSquared RMSE # observations .51 .58 .47 .51 .32 .27 .30 .29 .34 .50 .33 .26 .027 .034 .028 .036 .032 .041 .041 .042 .031 .037 .031 .316 112 112 112 98 98 98 98 112 112 112 98 Bern – October 112 18, 2006 Conclusions and future research Not all manufacturing industries outsource production to the same extent either inside or outside the country; Off-shore outsourcing took off in 1999-2003, not before; Only the international outsourcing of intermediates is positively related to productivity growth, while the other forms of outsourcing are not robustly related to productivity growth Bern – October 18, 2006 Conclusions and future research Direct and indirect measures of outsourcing provide different empirical results The results obtained from our indicator of outsourcing are quite different from those arising from the commonly used Feenstra- Hanson measures of outsourcing Bern – October 18, 2006 Conclusions and future research Disaggregate market services further Potential to do so: I-O Table available with up to 101 industries Improve econometric techniques to more satisfactorily deal with endogeneity issues Bern – October 18, 2006 Backup Slides FH vs DIJ: OSM Absolute differences DIJ-FH 1995 0.027 0.052 0.039 0.036 0.125 0.202 0.134 0.183 0.063 0.076 -0.048 0.077 -0.058 0.158 1996 0.029 0.049 0.031 0.037 0.111 0.243 0.126 0.174 0.058 0.074 -0.049 0.068 -0.065 0.129 1997 0.030 0.060 0.027 0.038 0.118 0.237 0.122 0.179 0.061 0.075 -0.045 0.064 -0.065 0.134 1998 0.029 0.056 0.031 0.035 0.119 0.100 0.122 0.166 0.059 0.076 -0.047 0.060 -0.075 0.138 1999 0.031 0.053 0.030 0.031 0.115 0.103 0.115 0.160 0.057 0.074 -0.044 0.060 -0.068 0.116 2000 0.031 0.065 0.030 0.034 0.124 0.265 0.127 0.189 0.065 0.076 -0.045 0.075 -0.077 0.129 2001 0.033 0.068 0.038 0.035 0.119 0.281 0.132 0.201 0.063 0.085 -0.047 0.062 -0.058 0.141 2002 0.035 0.069 0.037 0.039 0.125 0.287 0.123 0.175 0.057 0.075 -0.044 0.058 -0.086 0.133 2003 0.035 0.070 0.035 0.034 0.119 0.241 0.135 0.166 0.058 0.070 -0.038 0.066 -0.089 0.130 d(1995-99) 0.004 0.001 -0.009 -0.005 -0.011 -0.099 -0.019 -0.024 -0.006 -0.002 0.004 -0.017 -0.010 -0.042 d(1999-03) 0.004 0.017 0.006 0.006 d(1995-03) 0.005 0.003 0.004 0.008 0.018 -0.004 -0.002 -0.007 alim Correlation Across industries 1995 0.59 1996 0.53 1997 0.53 1998 0.70 1999 0.74 2000 0.59 2001 0.59 2002 0.56 2003 0.64 d(1995-99) 0.76 d(1999-03) 0.55 d(1995-03) 0.79 Over time alim 0.88 0.139 0.039 0.021 0.007 0.001 -0.005 0.002 -0.017 -0.005 -0.007 -0.021 0.014 0.010 -0.011 -0.031 -0.028 tessabbcuoio legno carta coke chem gom plamin nmet metal mecc ele mez tra oth man tessabbcuoio 0.99 0.99 legno 0.90 carta 0.95 coke 0.93 chem 0.97 gom plamin nmet metal 0.70 0.93 0.96 mecc 0.93 ele 0.95 mez tra oth man 0.96 0.42 FH vs DIJ: OSS Absolute differences DIJ-FH 1995 -0.011 -0.011 -0.013 -0.012 -0.014 -0.005 -0.030 -0.014 -0.016 -0.029 -0.029 -0.024 -0.043 0.000 1996 -0.011 -0.012 -0.014 -0.011 -0.010 -0.010 -0.032 -0.015 -0.015 -0.029 -0.032 -0.022 -0.047 -0.001 1997 -0.011 -0.015 -0.013 -0.013 -0.011 -0.008 -0.033 -0.015 -0.016 -0.031 -0.032 -0.024 -0.048 -0.003 1998 -0.010 -0.013 -0.013 -0.013 -0.010 0.011 -0.032 -0.015 -0.016 -0.032 -0.032 -0.022 -0.052 -0.001 1999 -0.012 -0.015 -0.016 -0.013 -0.011 0.003 -0.036 -0.018 -0.016 -0.033 -0.035 -0.027 -0.055 -0.003 2000 -0.012 -0.018 -0.021 -0.014 -0.014 -0.011 -0.042 -0.020 -0.017 -0.039 -0.038 -0.035 -0.060 -0.004 2001 -0.013 -0.021 -0.021 -0.011 -0.010 0.000 -0.050 -0.021 -0.016 -0.037 -0.038 -0.030 -0.057 -0.003 2002 -0.015 -0.020 -0.021 -0.014 -0.012 0.004 -0.054 -0.020 -0.014 -0.035 -0.039 -0.029 -0.068 -0.003 2003 -0.016 -0.022 -0.022 -0.017 -0.012 0.000 -0.053 -0.025 -0.014 -0.036 -0.038 -0.028 -0.066 -0.005 d(1995-99) -0.001 -0.005 -0.003 -0.001 0.003 0.008 -0.006 -0.003 0.000 -0.003 -0.006 -0.003 -0.012 -0.002 d(1999-03) -0.004 -0.007 -0.006 -0.004 0.000 -0.003 -0.018 -0.008 0.002 -0.003 -0.002 -0.001 -0.012 -0.002 d(1995-03) -0.005 -0.011 -0.009 -0.005 alim Correlation Across industries 1995 0.62 1996 0.65 1997 0.63 1998 0.56 1999 0.63 2000 0.63 2001 0.62 2002 0.51 2003 0.55 d(1995-99) 0.73 d(1999-03) 0.24 d(1995-03) 0.39 Over time alim 0.90 0.003 0.005 -0.024 -0.011 0.002 -0.006 -0.009 -0.004 -0.023 -0.004 tessabbcuoio legno carta coke chem gom plamin nmet metal mecc ele mez tra oth man tessabbcuoio 0.95 0.87 legno 0.77 carta 0.00 coke 0.78 chem 0.68 gom plamin nmet metal 0.71 0.58 0.79 mecc 0.79 ele 0.92 mez tra oth man 0.44 0.86 FH measure of service outsourcing SYMMETRIC I-O TABLES Total intermediates Domestic intermediates Imported intermediates SYMMETRIC I-O TABLES Domestic use costi di produzione interna sostenuti dalla branca agricoltura per acquistare prodotti agricoli necessari per la sua produzione di prodotti agricoli, prodotti industriali e servizi costi di produzione interna sostenuti dalla branca agricoltura per acquistare prodotti industriali necessari per la sua produzione di prodotti agricoli, prodotti industriali e servizi SYMMETRIC I-O TABLES Imported use Supply I.P.I. I.I.C.