Making the case in the institution Daryl Sharp, PhD, RN, CS, NPP

advertisement
Making the case in the
institution
Daryl Sharp, PhD, RN, CS, NPP
University of Rochester
School of Nursing
January 12, 2006
Theoretical guides
• The work of Edwin Friedman
– Anchored in and extends Bowen theory
Friedman, E. H. (1985). Generation to generation. NY: The
Guilford Press.
Friedman, E. H. Bowen theory and therapy. In: AS Gurman, AS,
Kniskern DP, editors. Handbook of family therapy. vol. 2.. NY:
Brunner/Mazel; 1991. p. 134-170.
• Self-determination theory
– Theory of motivation
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-
determination in human behavior. NY: Plenum Press.
Differentiation and
Leadership
“The key to successful leadership has more
to do with the capacity for self-definition
than with the ability to motivate others.”
Friedman, E.H. (1985), p. 221
Differentiation defined
• Refers to taking responsibility for defining
positions on matters of importance
• Consistent with one’s own values and
goals
• Holding onto such positions in the face of
reactivity from others
Leadership components through
self-differentiation
• The leader needs to define his or her
position:
– Take non-reactive, clearly conceived , and
well defined positions
• The leader needs to stay in
touch/connected with the body
• The leader needs to have a capacity to
deal with the sabotage
Component I:
Defining one’s position
• DNP as vision
• What else is new?
• Limitations of current programs
• Excessive focus on secondary issues
Underlying assumptions
• The usefulness of the DNP is contingent
upon its development as a rigorous
doctoral level, high quality, excellent
curriculum
Underlying assumptions
• The content AND process components of
the DNP curriculum are equally
important/valued
Underlying assumptions
• Success of the DNP is dependent on the
collective efforts of our faculty in
partnership with our colleagues in practice
Choosing your committee
• Desirable qualities
–
–
–
–
–
Intellectual curiosity
Flexibility in thinking
Adventuresome: energized by innovation & challenge
Interpersonally skilled & well-respected
Emotionally mature: capacity to stay connected &
non-reactive especially in the face of opposition
• Strategic appointees
– Broad representation from SON & practice
– Familiarity with institutional processes
Strategies for developing
thoughtful positions
• Educate yourself
– Read the literature
– Understand the arguments pro & con
– Seek others’ perspectives
– Decide what you think: formulate position
• Write about your thinking
• Benchmark
• Write more about your thinking
DNP Program Evaluation
Template
SON or
CON
Key
con-tent
Tracks
Credits
Model
Struc-ture
FT/
PT
Capstone
Other
Identify your conceptual
framework
• Defining your unique perspective
• Build on your strengths
• The Rochester Model:
– Unification for the 21st Century: guides
curriculum content consistent with AACN
Essentials
– Self-determination theory: guides educational
process
URSON Unification Model
for the 21st Century
Systems
Self-Determination Theory:
Student-faculty relationships
• Autonomously motivated students:
– Achieve higher academic outcomes
– Perceive themselves as more competent
– Have greater self-worth
– Prefer and experience more pleasure from
optimal challenges
– Generate more creativity
– Are likely to remain in school
Self-Determination Theory:
Student-faculty relationships
• Students flourish with autonomy
supportive teachers:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Higher academic achievement
Greater conceptual understanding
Greater perceived competence
Higher self-esteem
Greater flexibility in thinking
More active information processing
Greater creativity
Higher retention rates
Self-Determination Theory:
Student-faculty relationships
• Autonomy supportive teachers cultivate autonomously
motivated students
• DNP curriculum: autonomy supportive
• Autonomously motivated teachers (not “assigned”)
• Autonomy supportive approaches to learning
• DNP graduates internalize value of autonomous
motivation for learning
• DNP graduates advocate for and lead creation of
autonomy supportive (patient-centered) care
environments
– Improved clinical outcomes
– Greater satisfaction with care (and caregiving)
SDT Reference
Reeve, J. (2002). SDT applied to educational
settings. In E.L. Deci, & R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
Handbook of Self-Determination Research.
Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Component II:
Staying in touch
• Faculty forum
– January & April 2005
– Back to school: August 2005
• Community forums
– Each health care system in Rochester
• Informal, “copy room” conversations
• Running ideas by one’s most
thoughtful (and sometimes most
oppositional) colleagues
Component III:
Staying ahead of the
sabotage
• Skillful use of the
DNP-faculty-you/committee
triangle
Faculty
You
DNP
• Be respectful (tend your boundaries): do
not get ahead of yourself
• Stay connected to your opponents
Where we are
• DNP program proposal to curriculum
committee January or February
• Faculty review/decision
• To Board of Trustees in March or April
• To NYS Department of Education
• Market program in spring/summer
• Admit 1st cohort (8 students) 9/06-1/07
• Go slow; aim high!
URSON Dean Emeritus:
Loretta C. Ford, EdD, RN, FAAN
“NP /DNP groundbreaker”
Download