Team Members: Michael J. Higgins Anthony Virata Joseph Banks Gary Calpo Khuram Imtiaz Abdul Khan SBIR Approval -Presented by Michael Higgins 1. 2. 3. 4. Societal Problem Why Should We Care? The RMS Solution RMS Project Plan Phase Zero Phase One Phase Two Phase Three Out Years 5. Evaluation Plan 6. Funding Plan 7. Marketing Plan 8. Contractual Aspects 9. Risk Management Plan 10. Conclusion Slide : 2 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 The Societal Problem Increasing demand, wasteful usage, and finite resources lead to energy and natural resource shortages Slide : 3 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Resource Use and Production Slide : 4 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 “Total electricity demand is projected to grow by 1.9 percent per year from 2001 through 2020” – Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy Slide : 5 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Energy Use Per Capita Energy use per capita,1970-2025(index,1970 = 1) History: Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 2001, DOE/EIA0384(2001) (Washington, DC, August 2002). Projections: Table A20. Slide : 6 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Estimated Energy Waste About 42.5% of the energy used in the U.S. is wasted due to inefficient use. http://www.geosc.psu.edu/People/Faculty/FacultyPages/Kubicki/alternativeenergy.html -Penn State University Slide : 7 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Spot-Checked global electricity consumption source: US Department of Energy Slide : 8 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Estimated Total Waste Slide : 9 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Why Should We Care? Slide : 10 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 California Energy Crisis • Demand outweighed production • California energy companies were forced to buy out of state electricity • Electricity costs went from $29.71 per Mwh to $376.99 per Mwh • Electric bills went up 59% http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/california/subsequentevents.html -department of energy Slide : 11 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Consumption Exceeds Production Energy Cite and Virginia power maintain that consumption can be reduced by 15% when consumers are informed on energy use and increase efficiency Total electricity demand is projected to grow by 1.9 percent per year from 2001 through 2020” – Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy Slide : 12 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 The RMS Solution What RMS is and how it can help to reduce waste. Using energy wisely is no secret. It's simply a matter of awareness, knowledge and planning. –Dominion Virginia Power’s Website Slide : 13 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 What is RMS? Web-based tool to bring real-time consumption data to the utility customer • Capable of monitoring electric, water, natural gas, and oil consumption • Displays current resource use • Analyzes consumption data and displays it in graphical format • Penalty notifications • Peak-demand notifications • Budgeting tool • Water/Gas leak detection Slide : 14 *RMS Technical Approach Tuesday, July 26, 2016 RMS Product Goals • Educate businesses and homeowners on their resource usage patterns • Be on the market before the crisis point is reached, that is when the need exceeds the supply (Our projection year is 2008) • Market to: • Utility Companies (Electric, Gas, Oil) • Public Works (Water) • Inform the consumer of peak demand times and government imposed limits • Provide an intuitive user interface • Format the data in a way that is useful to the consumer Slide : 15 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Data Flow Diagram Slide : 16 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Slide : 17 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Product Demonstration Slide : 18 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Product Demonstration Slide : 19 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Product Demonstration Slide : 20 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Product Demonstration Slide : 21 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 RMS and Automated Meter Reading (AMR) Past, Present, and Future Slide : 22 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 RMS Project Plan The Resource Monitoring System (RMS) project will span three years beginning on 2/12/2003 and ending on 4/3/2006 with the shift to the out years. This project will be completed by employing a four-phase plan. RMS Project Schedule Slide : 23 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase Zero, Conception This phase is called the “CONCEPTION PHASE”, which will span 65 days beginning on 2/12/2003 and ending on 5/8/2003 with a phase 1 approval. Phase Deliverables Initial Project Research Feasibility Presentation Milestone Planning Presentation RMS Web Site SBIR Grant Proposal Document SBIR Approval Presentation Slide : 24 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase Zero Schedule Slide : 25 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase Zero Personnel Project Manager Research and Development Manger Finance Manager Legal Manager Marketing and Sales Manager Web and Software Development Manager Slide : 26 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase Zero Management Plan Phase Zero Management Structure Slide : 27 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 PHASE 1, Proof Of Concept This phase is called the “PROOF OF CONCEPT PHASE”; which will span over 88 days. It will continue between Mon 5/12/03 and Fri 8/15/03. Phase Deliverables • • • • Slide : 28 Prototype Design Completed Lab Prototype Database RMS Software AMR Simulator Preliminary Production Specs Business Plan Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 1 Schedule Slide : 29 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 1 Personnel Project Manager Research Manager Finance Manager Legal Manager Marketing Manager Web/Software Manager DBA SQL Programmer Java/Web Programmer Lawyer Labor Total Slide : 30 $65,561.44 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 1 Management Structure Slide : 31 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 1 Budget Software Component Description Unit Cost Quantity Sub Total Database/Application Server: NuSphere PHPed MySQL/PHP/Apache 2 $299.00 $598.00 Operating System: RedHat Linux 9 Professional 2 $149.00 $298.00 Dreamweaver MX 2 $700.00 $1,400.00 SSL Certificate 1 $200.00 $200.00 Miscellaneous Software Tools 1 $845.00 $845.00 Software Total $3,341.00 Hardware Component Description Phase Total Quantity Unit Cost Sub Total 2 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 11 $1,500.00 $16,500.00 Wireless Network Card 1 $150.00 $150.00 Wireless Network Access Point/Router 1 $200.00 $200.00 Managed Fast Ethernet Switch 1 $500.00 $500.00 Laptop Computer w/OS and Office Suite 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 Miscellaneous cables, connectors, tools. 1 $745.00 $745.00 Dual processor Server Workstation w/OS and Office Suite Software Total $3,341.00 Hardware Total $31,095.00 Labor Total $65,561.44 Overall Phase I Total $99,997.44 Hardware Total Slide : 32 $31,095.00 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 PHASE 2, Prototype and Development This phase is called the “INITIAL PROJECT”; which will span over 438 days. It will continue between Mon 9/8/03 and Thu 5/12/05 Phase Deliverables • • • • • Production Specs Management Plan Personnel Plan Test and Evaluation Plan Working Functional Prototype Slide : 33 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 2 Schedule Slide : 34 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 2 Personnel • Project Manager • Research and Development Manger • Finance Manager • Legal Manager • Marketing and Sales Manager • Web and Software Development Manager • Java Programmer (2) • SQL Programmer (2) • Contractor - Equipment Install • Contractor - Network Install • System Manager • Technician • Database Administrator • Lawyer • Document Specialist • Customer Support (3) Slide : 35 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 2 Management Plan Slide : 36 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 2 Budget Phase Totals Labor Total $405,202.80 Software Total $22,540.00 Hardware Total $91,995.00 40% Overhead $162,081.12 Contingency @ 10% $68,181.89 Overall Phase II Total Slide : 37 $750,000.81 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 PHASE 3, Production This phase is called the “PRODUCTION PHASE”; which will span over 232 days and it will continue between Wed 5/13/05 and 4/3/06 Phase Deliverables • • • • • Customer Acceptance Testing Production Finalization Developed Out-Year Approach Developed Out-Year Organization Shift to Out-Years Sustained RMS System Continued Development Expansion of Market Slide : 38 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 3 Schedule Slide : 39 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 3 Management Plan Slide : 40 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Phase 3 Budget Phase Total Labor Total $262,739.20 Software Total $32,110.00 Hardware Total $221,350.00 40% Overhead $105,095.68 Contingency @ 10% Overall Phase III Total Slide : 41 $62,129.49 $683,424.37 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Budget Totals TOTALS FOR PHASE I, II, AND III Phase I $99,998.14 Phase II $750,000.81 Phase III $683,424.37 OVERALL TOTAL Slide : 42 $1,533,423.32 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Out Years Budget and Personnel Personnel Out-Years Budget (First Year) •Project Manager •Research Manager Software Total •Finance Manager •Legal Manager Hardware Total •Marketing Manager •Web/Software Manager Labor Total •System Manager •SQL Programmer Contingency @ 10% •Java/Web Programmer •Lawyer Overall Out-Year Total •Lobbyist •Customer Service Technician (10) Slide : 43 $20,450.00 $120,000.00 $1,444,205.00 $158,465.50 $1,743,120.50 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Evaluation Plan • Program Design Reviews Assessment of the project at the early stages of each phase • Technical Reviews Evaluates the direction taken in design, development, and testing of the project Includes System Requirements Review (SRR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR) , and Critical Design Reviews (CDR) • Quality Reviews Evaluate the processes used by team members to perform tasks, including the evaluations Evaluate deliverables for compliance with contractual requirements Recommend corrective and preventive actions if necessary • Periodical Reporting Used to track progress of the project Slide : 44 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Funding Plan http://www.science.doe.gov/sbir http://www.cs.odu.edu/~virata/cs410/SBIR.doc Slide : 45 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Marketing Strategy • Market to Utilities Increased Competitiveness More Capable of Providing Energy on Demand During Peak Usage Times Capable of Passing the Cost on to the Consumer • Market to Public Works Environmentally Friendly Political Issue More Capable of Providing Water During Drought Times Without Adding Additional Pipelines • Estimated Charge: $1.00 per registered user per month Slide : 46 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Estimated Return on Investment Slide : 47 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Incentives for Nashville Electric Increased Competitiveness with Other Electricity Resellers More Capable of Providing Energy on Demand During Peak Usage Times Capable of Passing the Cost on to the Consumer The Hardware is Currently In Place Enhances NES’s Budget Billing Program Enhances NES’s Power Promise of Lower Rates under 2000KWh Free of Charge During Phase 2 Slide : 48 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Contractual Plan • Infrastructure Installation To help install the network and technological infrastructure (RHCE, CCNA, or equivalent) • Power Companies Nashville Electric Services (phase 2) Pico and others after phase 2 • • • • Natural Gas Companies Oil Providers Public Works Departments (per city) AMR Companies Agreements to expand and implement the technology (during Phase 3 and out years) Advanced Technologies Ramar (ATR) Slide : 49 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Risks Risk Types Risks Probability Consequence Marketing Risk Insufficient Market Low Severe Marketing Risk Lack of Utility Company Cooperation Moderate Severe Marketing Risk Competition Moderate Moderate Marketing Risk Inability to Secure Sufficient Funding Moderate Severe Marketing Risk Lack or Loss of User Interest in RMS Low Moderate Legal Risk Lack of Government Cooperation Low Severe Technical Risk Compatibility with Utility Company Databases Moderate Low to Moderate Technical Risk Customers may be overwhelmed with the myriad of data provided Fair Moderate Production Risk Loss of a Vendor or Equipment Supplier Low Low Slide : 50 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Risk Management Plan Lack of Utility Company/ Public Works Cooperation Solution: To develop systems that can function independent from the utility's meters. The main draw is the cost of the system will go up as the client will have to pay for the equipment and installation of the monitoring devices. Consumers may loose interest and not use the service after the novelty wears off Solution: RMS will continually be developed to better provide for the consumers needs Information overload – Consumers may be overwhelmed with the myriad of data provided Solution: RMS will format the data in a way that is not overwhelming and is easy to understand and apply. Competition Solution: RMS will offer a wide variety of systems to encompass a larger customer base, specifically the home market where costs have generally made these types of systems uncommon. Compatibility with Utility Company Databases Solution: Plan for extra development time during this part. Slide : 51 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Why should ODU approve RMS as a semester project?? -Page 12 in the SBIR Proposal Document Slide : 52 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Slide : 53 Tuesday, July 26, 2016 Questions?? Slide : 54 Tuesday, July 26, 2016