Intelligent Cruise Control
Timothy Egan
Phillip Elliot
Kerry Frisby
Ali Nazar Hussian
Michael Janda
7/26/2016
1
Organization
Tim Egan
Societal Aspects
Legal Aspects
Phillip Elliott
Technical Aspects
Web Master
Presenter
Kerry Frisby
Project Manager
Technical Aspects
Michael Janda
Grant Research
Legal Aspects
Ali Nazar Hussian
Grant Research
7/26/2016
2
Outline







7/26/2016
Societal Issues and Background
Solution
Goals and Objectives
Management Plan
Budget and Funding
Marking
Questions
3
Societal Problem
The slow decision making ability
and reaction time of drivers to
adapt to changing traffic patterns in
fast pace driving
7/26/2016
4
Statistics



7/26/2016
Rear end collisions are the most
common
Over two million accidents per
year are reported
Millions of dollars in accident
cost
5
7/26/2016
6
Statistics



7/26/2016
70% of new cars will have
standard cruise control installed
55 Million cars are manufactured
each year
38.5 Million cars will be equipped
with cruise control
7
Goal
Assist all drivers in maximum
use of cruise control for
convenience and safety
7/26/2016
8
Objectives



7/26/2016
Warn driver of impending collision
Increase drivers decision making in
impending dangers
Increase the efficiency of cruise
control systems
9
Solution
The Intelligent Cruise
Control



7/26/2016
To modify current cruise control by
adding a radar system
able to detect the speed, the
distance, and the closing speed of
the car in front of you
adjusts your speed accordingly to
maintain a safe following distance
10
Current vs. ICC

7/26/2016
Current
 Keeps current speed
 Allows manual decrease of
speed
ICC
 Constantly searches targets in
front of car
 Automatically decreases speed
when necessary
 May prevent accidents
11
Product Goal



7/26/2016
Introduce before competition
Provide a quality product which
increases travel reaction time
helping to save lives and cost in
property damage
Market to electronic business
12
Principle
7/26/2016
13
Technical Approach
Components:
 Radar
 CPU
 Light Indicator
 Buzzer
7/26/2016
14
Component Diagram
7/26/2016
15
Radar



7/26/2016
Located in front of car
Transmit data to CPU
Detects distance, speed, and
closing distance of vehicle in front
of you
16
Chaotic Radar
7/26/2016
17
CPU


7/26/2016
Located in current location in
vehicle
Analyses received calculations and
determines needed action
18
Light Indicator
7/26/2016

Alerts driver when assistance is
given

Alerts driver to take action
19
Buzzer
7/26/2016

Alerts driver to take action

Gives an audio warning
20
Product Layout
7/26/2016
21
User Interface
7/26/2016
22
Expanded Management Structure
General
Manager
Project
Manager
Web Developer
Legal
Liabilities
Financial
&
Budget
Research
and
Development
Marketing
Documentation
Writers
Quality
Assurance
7/26/2016
Financial
Analyst
Hardware
Software
Auto
Mechanic
Programmer 1
Auto
Mechanic
Programmer 2
Marketing
Specialist
Grant
Writer
Technical
Writer
23
Phase I Personnel




7/26/2016
Auto mechanic (1)
Electronic Engineer (1)
Project Manager (1)
Software Developer (1)
24
Phase II & III Personnel







7/26/2016
Auto mechanic (3)
Electronic Engineer (1)
Project Manager (1)
Software Developer (1)
Document Specialist (1)
Lawyer (1)
Contract Manager (1)
25
Contracts Aspects
Legal
7/26/2016

Liability insurance

Electronic retail contracts
26
Schedule
7/26/2016

Phase I - Specifications

Phase II – Prototype and Funding

Phase III – Production of ICC
27
Phase I
Task





Final Management Plan
 Jan 2003 – Feb 2003
Software Development
Hardware Development
 Jan 2003 – Mar 2003
Installation and Testing
 Jan 2003 – Dec 2005
Shift to Production Phase
 Sept 2004 – Dec 2005
7/26/2016
Start Date
Finish Date
1000 Management Plan
1100 Resources and Hiring Process
1999 Organization Approval
1-Jan-03
1-Jan-03
15-Feb-03
15-Dec-05
15-Dec-05
15-Feb-03
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2999
Software Development
Software Integration
Software Testing
Evaluate Test Results
Identify Bugs and Fixes
Completion of Testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-03
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Dec-05
16-Dec-04
16-Feb-05
16-Feb-04
3000 Hardware Development
3100 Hardware Integration
3200 Hardware Testing
3300 Evaluate Test Results
3400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
3999 Completion of testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
4000 Installation and Testing
4100 Equipment Installation
4200 Integration Testing
4300 Evaluate Test Results
4400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
4500 Change and Modify
4999 Completion of Testing
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-04
1-May-03
1-Jan-03
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-03
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-05
1-May-04
15-Aug-05
1-Sep-05
1-Sep-04
16-Sep-04
31-Dec-05
5000 Shift to Production Phase
5100 Project Shut Down Management Plan
5200 Develop Production Organization
5999 Mass Production
1-Jan-04
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-04
1-Dec-0
31-Dec-05
31-Dec-05
1-Dec-04
1-Dec-04
28
Phase II
Final Management Plan

Jan
2003 – Feb 2003
Software Development

Hardware Development

Jan
2003 – Mar 2003
Installation and Testing

Jan
2003 – Dec 2005
Shift to Production Phase

Sept
7/26/2016
2004 – Dec 2005
Task
Start Date
Finish Date
1000 Management Plan
1100 Resources and Hiring Process
1999 Organization Approval
1-Jan-03
1-Jan-03
15-Feb-03
15-Dec-05
15-Dec-05
15-Feb-03
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2999
Software Development
Software Integration
Software Testing
Evaluate Test Results
Identify Bugs and Fixes
Completion of Testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-03
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Dec-05
16-Dec-04
16-Feb-05
16-Feb-04
3000 Hardware Development
3100 Hardware Integration
3200 Hardware Testing
3300 Evaluate Test Results
3400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
3999 Completion of testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
4000 Installation and Testing
4100 Equipment Installation
4200 Integration Testing
4300 Evaluate Test Results
4400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
4500 Change and Modify
4999 Completion of Testing
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-04
1-May-03
1-Jan-03
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-03
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-05
1-May-04
15-Aug-05
1-Sep-05
1-Sep-04
16-Sep-04
31-Dec-05
5000 Shift to Production Phase
5100 Project Shut Down Management Plan
5200 Develop Production Organization
5999 Mass Production
1-Jan-04
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-04
1-Dec-0
31-Dec-05
31-Dec-05
1-Dec-04
1-Dec-04
29
Phase III
Task





Final Management Plan
 Jan 2003 – Feb 2003
Software Development
Hardware Development
 Jan 2003 – Mar 2003
Installation and Testing
 Jan 2003 – Dec 2005
Shift to Production
Phase
 Sept 2004 – Dec2005
7/26/2016
Start Date
Finish Date
1000 Management Plan
1100 Resources and Hiring Process
1999 Organization Approval
1-Jan-03
1-Jan-03
15-Feb-03
15-Dec-05
15-Dec-05
15-Feb-03
2000
2100
2200
2300
2400
2999
Software Development
Software Integration
Software Testing
Evaluate Test Results
Identify Bugs and Fixes
Completion of Testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-03
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Dec-05
16-Dec-04
16-Feb-05
16-Feb-04
3000 Hardware Development
3100 Hardware Integration
3200 Hardware Testing
3300 Evaluate Test Results
3400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
3999 Completion of testing
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-03
17-Dec-03
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-03
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Dec-04
31-Jan-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
16-Feb-04
4000 Installation and Testing
4100 Equipment Installation
4200 Integration Testing
4300 Evaluate Test Results
4400 Identify Bugs and Fixes
4500 Change and Modify
4999 Completion of Testing
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-04
1-May-03
1-Jan-03
1-Mar-03
1-Mar-03
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-05
1-May-04
15-Aug-05
1-Sep-05
1-Sep-04
16-Sep-04
31-Dec-05
5000 Shift to Production Phase
5100 Project Shut Down Management Plan
5200 Develop Production Organization
5999 Mass Production
1-Jan-04
1-Jan-03
1-Sep-04
1-Dec-0
31-Dec-05
31-Dec-05
1-Dec-04
1-Dec-04
30
Phase I Evaluation Criteria




7/26/2016
Scientific/technical merit and
feasibility
Experience qualifications and
facility
Effectiveness of proposed work
plan
Commercial merit and feasibility
31
Phase I Budget
Summary

Total Phase 1 Budget $100,000




Personal
General and Administrate Cost
Miscellaneous Resources
Materials
Totals
7/26/2016
$50,000
$20,000
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
$100,000
32
Gantt Chart
7/26/2016
33
Phase 1 Recourses (Software)

Microsoft Office 2000 (1)
Microsoft Project 2000 (1)
Coffee Cup Html Editor (1)
Quicken 2003
(1)
$439.00
599.00
49 .00
89.00

Total
$1,177.00



7/26/2016
34
Phase I Resources (Equipment)

Dell Dimension 8200 (1)
$1,7800.00
Dell Dimension 2300 (1)
588.00
HP Laser Jet 4100
(1)
1,830.00
Craftsman Tool Set
(1)
1,600.00
Craftsman Tool Drawer (1)
129.00
Miscellaneous
500.00

Total





7/26/2016
$4,705.00
35
Evaluation Methods




7/26/2016
Program design Review
Critical Design Review
Factory acceptance Test
Customer Acceptance Test
36
Marketing
7/26/2016

Advertise at the local computer
shows (Market Pro)

Contracts with the local electronic
stores (Best Buy, Circuit City,etc)
37
Risks
7/26/2016

External forces may jam radar

People may be slow to use the
new technology
38
Conclusion
. The ICC will be the future tool to allow technology to
assist driver and to help insure safety on the
highway system
7/26/2016
39
Questions and Answers
7/26/2016
40
Pros



7/26/2016
Allows for more reaction time so
that a driver may prevent accidents
If accident, will lessen impact
velocity, thus lower cost for repairs,
and more importantly, less of a
serious impact to driver and
passengers
Relative easy implementation
41
Cons
 Cars must already have an existing
cruise control system
 Cars without a easily mounted
Cruise Control system will make
installation difficult
7/26/2016
42
Will Do



7/26/2016
The ICC is able to detect a vehicle
in front of it.
Based on the distance, actual
speed and speed differences, the
system calculates the needed
acceleration or deceleration to
maintain a safe distance.
The ICC will help less aware
drivers maintain control over the
vehicle.
43
Project Status



7/26/2016
Feasibility
Technology Research
Integration of radar with the cruise
control computer
44
Will not do
 It will not change the driver’s
behavior (aggressive driving)
 It will not be a pure safety device in
which it can not directly prevent
accident but it will increase
reaction time
7/26/2016
45
Technology
(Chaotic Radar Waves)
1.) It is inexpensive
2.) It is more efficient
3.) It does more accurate
measurements
4.) It is capable of high interference
rejection
7/26/2016
46
Social Impact


7/26/2016
Less cost of insurance claims,
injuries, and vehicle repairs in
accidents
Safer roads due to the maintaining
of speed and following distance.
47
Competition


7/26/2016
Berkley- ($200M grant from GM)
working on providing
specifications for a fully operating
system with the smart highway
system
Mitsubishi- has design of the
chaotic radar and should be
implementing technology in new
cars with next few years
48
Customer
All vehicle owners who currently
use a cruise control system
7/26/2016
49
Radar Example
7/26/2016
50
Buzzer Example
7/26/2016
51
Light Indicator Example
7/26/2016
52
CPU Example
7/26/2016
53