Comcover's Legal Services Information Forum Series 2013 – The Impact of Pulling

advertisement
Error! AutoText entry not defined.
Error! AutoText entry not defined.
Comcover's Legal Services Information
Forum Series 2013
Administrative decision making – The Impact of Pulling
the Plug!
Enforcement
actionTsacalos,
under the
Water
Efficiency
Labelling
Presented
by Dr Ashley
Partner,
Norton
Rose Fulbright
and Standards Act 2005 (Cth)
Tuesday 26 November 2013, 10:45am – 11:45am
This session will examine the liability and administrative law issues associated with government decisions
to
end a government
scheme/program or effect a key policy change that has both financial and nonNovember
2013
financial consequences for individuals and the private sector generally. It will also include a discussion of
risk management strategies and practices associated with the conceptualisation and implementation of
government schemes and programs. A number of case studies will be referred to and discussion about the
various lessons learnt.
Summary
According to the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO):
“Implementation and delivery of Australian Government policy initiatives is one of the key
responsibilities of government agencies. In recent years there has been an increasing focus on and
a community expectation of, sound policy implementation and seamless delivery of government
policies — on time, within budget and to an acceptable level of quality”. 1
The ANAO’s Better Practice Guide for the “Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives: Making
implementation matter”, considers the importance of adequate attention, during policy development, to
implementation risks and practicalities. It then proceeds to addresses other key considerations as the
initiative develops from the initial policy concept including . governance; risk management; implementation
planning; procurement and contract management; stakeholder management; resources; communication;
and monitoring and review.
This provides a useful framework in terms of the conceptualisation and implementation of a policy or
program for the purposes of considering the specific question of: how to plan for the possible cancellation of
the policy or program? This issue needs to be considered specifically in this phase as it determines the
types of issues that may arise upon cancellation and the mechanisms or protections that may be available
to assist in the event that cancellation eventuates. However, there will be issues that arise upon
cancellation that could not have been foreseen or anticipated as well as those issues that are an inevitable
result of cancellation that will need to be addressed.
In light of this, this seminar is divided into two parts:
1. Policy design and implementation – issues to address in preparation for possible cancellation
2. Policy cancellation – issues that arise upon cancellation.
The issues discussed will be addressed by reference to appropriate examples and case studies.
Australian National Audit Office, “Implementation of Programme and Policy Initiatives: Making implementation matter”,
Better Practice Guide, October 2006, p.1.
1
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
November 2013
2
1. Policy design and implementation – issues to address in preparation for possible cancellation
a)
Risk management, including an exit strategy (as part of contingency planning)
b)
Specific risk allocation clauses:
i.
insurance and insurance-related clauses
ii.
indemnity clauses
iii.
limitation of liability clauses
c)
Other relevant contractual clauses:
i.
liquidated damages clauses
ii.
fitness for purpose clauses
iii.
termination for convenience clauses
iv.
dispute resolution clauses
v.
“reasonable cooperation and assistance” provisions
d)
Administrative law issues
i.
merits review
ii.
judicial review
e)
Compliance and enforcement
i.
information gathering powers
ii.
civil penalty regime
iii.
criminal sanctions
2. Policy cancellation – issues that arise upon cancellation.
a)
Liability
i.
negligence
ii.
misfeasance in public office
iii.
other actions
b)
Dealing with claims, disputes and litigation:
i.
alternative dispute resolution mechanisms
ii.
compensation schemes – including the CDDA Scheme and Act of Grace Payments
iii.
model litigant obligations
iv.
document management
c)
Other issues
i.
FOI and other compulsory production processes
ii.
administrative law issues
iii.
employment issues and OHS prosecutions (Comcare or State WorkCover agencies
iv.
parliamentary reviews, inquiries and third party reviews
v.
royal commissions, commissions of inquiry and judicial inquiries (and coronial inquiries)
Presenter:
Dr Ashley Tsacalos
Partner
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
Level 18, Grosvenor Place, 225 George Street, Sydney
Level 6, 60 Marcus Clarke Street, Canberra
Tel +61 2 9330 8151 | Mob +61 402 31 32 33 | Fax +61 2 9330 8111
ashley.tsacalos@nortonrosefulbright.com
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
November 2013
3
Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world’s pre-eminent corporations and
financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50
cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and
Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions;
energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and
healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and
integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to
maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton
Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of
which is a separate legal entity, are members (‘the Norton Rose Fulbright members’) of Norton Rose
Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton
Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
Law around the world
nortonrosefulbright.com
Disclaimer
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa
(incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose
Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton
Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of
their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director,
employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or
assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this presentation. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member,
employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this presentation is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it
constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed.
You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak
to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
Related documents
Download