Dimitra Doukas Research Paper An Analytical Examination at the Construct of a Character In Relation to a Successful Fictional Narrative Introduction: Ever since consciousness touched the earliest homo-sapiens, human beings have been telling stories. Whether they drew them upon cave walls, or, in their current form, burn them on silicone, humans have a universal need to share their consciousness. Civilizations have grown and fallen, technologies have advanced exponentially, and yet, the need to tell stories has never left us. At the heart of all these stories, the one unifying presence that we walk away from successful novels, movies, plays, is simply, its characters. Realistic, relatable characters are the lifeblood of a great story. The creation of these successful characters is a subtle and difficult process, but well within the grasp of the storyteller in all of us. Body Paragraph One: Premise - “No idea, and no situation, was ever strong enough to carry you through to its logical conclusion without a clear-cut premise… You must have a premise- a premise which will lead you unmistakably to the goal your play hopes to reach.” –Lejos Egri pg.6 1- Examples of a notable premise: “Great love defies even death.” From Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet. Its premise is clear, and it is proven by the end of the play. “Premise Development” - As soon as a premise has been determined, the writer must make a choice as to who will be best suited to telling the story, and ultimately, delivering in completion, its premise. 1- In Romeo & Juliet, the characters themselves are written as the best suited characters to deliver Shakespeare’s premise. Romeo and Juliet are both slightly hopeless romantics; Romeo, scorned by love before, gives his all into his relationship with Juliet. Juliet, who, as far as the audience can discern, has never been in love before, falls in love with Romeo (and as with all first loves), believes that it will last forever. In short, Shakespeare created two of the best suited characters to fulfill his premise. “Stereotype” - Starting with a Stereotype, the writer can create a thin outline of what their character should be like. 1- If the premise of their story revolves around living in the country in Alabama, a solid characters’ stereotype could be “a farmer,” or “a smalltown girl.” It would make no sense if the stereotype was “a big-shot, big-city lawyer.” - The Stereotype should not define who the character is, but give an illusion to how they appear to be. 1- Perhaps the “small-town girl” from Alabama is truly that, however, she could be a genius when it comes to computer programming and she can hack into any database in the nation. Her “small-town girl” stereotype does not define her, it is merely a starting point for the writer to expand upon on later. Body Paragraph Two: Egri’s “Physiology” - Incorporate the character to fit the premise. - Age, Sex, Height/Weight, Color of hair, skin, eyes, Posture, Appearance, Defects, Hereditary (Lejos Egri pg. 36) “Physicality” - Incorporating Egri’s ideas of constructing the physical being of a character. - How is the character built? How does he look like? Is he tall and well-built? Or average and reedy-looking? The way a character looks will tell the audience the type of person they will identify with throughout the story. - There are two basic types of character physicality’s to be aware of; the “Underdog” physicality (which the audience can readily relate to) and the “Projection” physicality (which the audience sees as the Adonis of human beings and wants to be.) - The “Underdog” vs. “Projection” qualities 1- “Underdog” Qualities a. Perhaps the character is too-skinny to look strong, too-short to be a threat, plain-looking enough not to be considered beautiful, walks awkwardly, or doesn’t speak well. b. The qualities of the “Underdog” are out of the “norm” of society. They are ostracized for being different. The audience sees a character like this, and can readily relate to them, because everyone at one point in their lives has felt like they didn’t belong. c. The audience can relate to this character and will root for them more whole-heartedly than if they weren’t able to connect with the character. 2- “Projection” Qualities a. Beautiful, strong, confident, adventurous, rich- whatever it is that as humans we want to be, the “Projection” character has. b. The majority of the audience will connect with this character, not because they can relate to them in a physical manner, but because they see the qualities they want projected in this character. The character is everything the audience wants to be, and so, will readily connect with them. - Some examples of “Underdog” qualities (from novels, movies and graphic novels): 1- Dev Patel’s character, Jamal, in Slumdog Millionaire. (Madhur Mittal’s character Salim can be considered a “Projection” character.) 2- Wall-E in the film Wall-E. (Eve, as a newer, sleekly designed robot, would be considered the “Projection” character.) 3- ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ 4- ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ 5- ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ 6- ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Body Paragraph Three: “Emotional Manifestations of Physicality” - The physical features of a person give insight into who they are emotionally. - It shows how they will relate to the world (a character who is five foot one will look at the world, move around space, and carry themselves different than a character who is six foot five.) - A character displaying “Underdog” physical features will have a different view of the world than a character who is a “Projection.” 1- The “Underdog” might be shy and tend to blend into the background readily, because all their life, people never expected much from them. 2- The “Projection” might be over-confident and laughs easily, because they were always praised. - The way they look doesn’t always show who a character is (the “Underdog” could be the smartest or dumbest person, the “Projection” could be vain or humble.) What is important is that the way a character looks is the first thing the audience will pick up onthey will want to have a picture in their mind of what the character looks like. They want to decide within that first impression of meeting a character, who is the person they’re being asked to invest their time and attention in. - How a character’s biological make-up forms their psychology. Body Paragraph Four: Egri’s Sociology and Psychology/ “Defining Personality” - Class, Education, Home Life, Occupation, Moral standards, Frustrations, complexes, Attitudes towards life, etc. (Egri, pg. 37) - A character’s appearance will affect how they view the world, as well as the type of person they are. - The experiences a character has had will affect the development of their persona. Growing up, what kind of fears did they have (did those fears carry over into - - adulthood?) Were there two parents involved in their life? What traumatic experiences did they go through (abuse, neglect, parent’s divorce, death of a pet, death of a loved one, first girlfriend/boyfriend cheated on them, etc.) A character must be a shade of grey. 1- No character can be all bad, or all good. Every human being is a delicate shade of grey (even if they’re leaning towards bad or good.) The character should fit the premise of the story- If one character is turning out too dark to fit the light-hearted premise of a comedic romp, there should be a decision on whether or not to continue to develop the character and find a story suitable for them, or whether to find a character more in tune with the comedic elements the writer wants to get across. Body Paragraph Five: Change - Characters must change. - For a realistic character, the writer must be aware that every person is in a constant state of change“A Character stands revealed through conflict ; conflict begins with a decision; a decision is made because of the premise of your play. The character’s decision necessarily sets in motion another decision, from his adversary. And it is these decisions, one resulting from the other, which propel the play to its ultimate destination: the proving of the premise. No man ever lived who could remain the same through a series of conflicts which affected his way of living. Of necessity he must change, and alter his attitude toward life.” -Lejos Egri pg. 61 Body Paragraph Six: