July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Date:
Authors:
Bruce Kraemer Marvell
Darwin Engwer Nortel
Networks
5488 Marvell Ln
Santa Clara, CA
95054
4655 Great America
Pkwy, Santa Clara
CA 95054
+1-321-427-
4098
+1-408-495-
2588
bkraemer@marvell.com
dengwer@nortel.com
Submission Slide 1 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission Slide 2 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
• Most of Circular letter components completed in Dubai
–
IMT.TECH contents/numbers finalized
–
IMT.EVAL contents/numbers finalized
–
Circular letter structure finalized
• Work to perform final cleanup and formatting will continue in correspondence
•
Circular letter contents to be completed in WP5D Seoul, Korea October 8-15
– Workshop Tuesday October 7
• WP5D Reports require approval by SG5 in November 10,11
Submission Slide 3 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Dubai
Submission Slide 4 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

Jan 2008
Jul 2008
Jan 2009
Nov 2009
July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT-Advanced RIT development process
Jan 2009
Nov 2009
Jan 2009
Jul 2010
Jan 2009
Nov 2010
Jan 2009
Jan 2010
Submission Slide 5 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
Updated WP5D workplan was 5D-97 now TEMP-81
•
Workshop draft plan 5D-185
•
Activity Reports:
•
53 Services Aspects
•
96 Spectrum Aspects
•
94 AH-Circular Letter
•
81 & 53 + Attachment Chapter 2 - ITU-R WP 5D Structure and Workplan Meeting
Report of Services WG
Submission Slide 6 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
89 (Rev 1)Draft New Report on Requirements related to technical system performance for
IMT-Advanced Radio interface(s) [IMT.TECH]
•
90 (Rev 1)Draft New Report [Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for
IMT-Advanced]
•
87 (Rev 1)Compliance template for Services
•
88 (Rev 1)Compliance template for technical performance
•
93 (Rev 1)Technology description template
•
78 (Rev 1)Draft new Report [IMT.REST] requirements, evaluation criteria, and submission templates for the development of IMT-Advanced
•
86 (Rev 1) IMT-ADV/2 – Submission and evaluation process and consensus building
Submission Slide 7 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
•
Submission Slide 8 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
•
Submission Slide 9 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Service Type Examples - Titles only
From M.1822
• Messaging
•
Voice telephony
•
Push-to-talk/Push-to-X
•
High-quality video telephony
•
Video conference
•
Internet browsing
•
Interactive gaming
•
File transfer/download
•
Multimedia
• e-Education
•
Consultation
•
Remote collaboration
•
Mobile commerce
•
Mobile broadcasting/multicasting
•
Machine-to-machine
•
Remote sensor
•
Remote bio-monitoring
•
Personal environment service
•
ITS-enabled services
•
Emergency calling
•
Public alerting
•
Number portability
•
Priority service
•
Lawful intercept
•
Location-based services
Submission Slide 10 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT- Advanced
IMT.TECH - Radio Requirements
•
4.1 Cell Spectral Efficiency - Table 1
•
4.2 Peak Spectral Efficiency
– 15 b/s/Hz downlink
– 6.75 b/s/Hz uplink
•
4.3 Bandwidth
– At least 3, Scalable up to and including 40 MHz
•
4.4 Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency – Table 2
•
4.5.1 Control Plane Latency
– <100ms
•
4.5.2 User Plane Latency
– <10 ms
•
4.6 Mobility up to 350 km/h - Table 3, Table 4
•
4.7 Handover – Table 5
•
4.8 VOIP Capacity – Table 6
Submission Slide 11 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.TECH - 4.1 Cell Spectral Efficiency
TABLE 1
Cell Spectral Efficiency
Test environment ** Downlink
(b/s/Hz/cell)
Uplink (b/s/Hz/cell)
Indoor
Microcellular
Base coverage urban
3
2.6
2.2
2.25
1.80
1.4
High speed 1.1
0.7
Cell [1] spectral efficiency (

) is defined as the aggregate throughput of all users
(the number of correctly received bits, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDUs delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time) divided by the channel bandwidth divided by the number of cells. The cell spectral efficiency is measured in b/s/Hz/cell.
[1] A cell is equivalent to a sector, e.g. a 3-sector site has 3 cells.
Submission Slide 12 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.TECH 4.4 Cell edge user spectral efficiency
TABLE 2
Cell Edge User Spectral Efficiency
Test environment* * Downlink (b/s/Hz) Uplink (b/s/Hz)
Indoor
Microcellular
Base coverage urban
High speed
0.1
0.075
0.06
0.04
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.015
The (normalized) user throughput is defined as the average user throughput (i.e., the number of correctly received bits by users, i.e. the number of bits contained in the SDU delivered to Layer 3, over a certain period of time, divided by the channel bandwidth and is measured in b/s/Hz. The cell edge user spectral efficiency is defined as 5% point of CDF of the normalized user throughput. Table 2 lists the cell edge user spectral efficiency requirements for various test environments.
Submission Slide 13 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.TECH -
The peak spectral efficiency is the highest theoretical data rate
(normalised by bandwidth), which is the received data bits assuming error-free conditions assignable to a single mobile station, when all available radio resources for the corresponding link direction are utilised (that is excluding radio resources that are used for physical layer synchronisation, reference signals or pilots, guard bands and guard times).
Submission Slide 14 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Indoor
Microcellular
Base Coverage
Urban
High Speed
IMT.TECH 4.6 Mobility
TABLE 3
Traffic Channel Link Data Rates
Bits/s/Hz
1.0
0.75
0.55
Speed (km/h)
10
30
120
0.25
350
Submission Slide 15 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008
Mobility classes supported
Indoor
Stationary, pedestrian doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.TECH 4.6 Mobility
TABLE 4
Mobility Classes
Microcellular
Test environments*
Stationary, pedestrian,
Vehicular (up to 30 km/h)
Base coverage urban
Stationary, pedestrian, vehicular
High speed
High speed vehicular, vehicular
–
–
–
The following classes of mobility are defined:
– Stationary: 0 km/h
Pedestrian:
Vehicular:
High speed vehicular:
> 0 km/h to 10 km/h
10 to 120 km/h
120 to 350 km/h
Submission Slide 16 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.TECH - 4.7 Handover
TABLE 5
Handover Interruption Times
Handover Type
Intra-Frequency
Inter-Frequency
Interruption Time
(ms)
27.5
– within a spectrum band
– between spectrum bands
40
60
The handover interruption time is defined as the time duration during which a user terminal cannot exchange user plane packets with any base station. The handover interruption time includes the time required to execute any radio access network procedure, radio resource control signalling protocol, or other message exchanges between the user equipment and the radio access network, as applicable to the candidate RIT or SRIT. For the purposes of determining handover interruption time, interactions with the core network (i.e, network entities beyond the radio access network) are assumed to occur in zero time. It is also assumed that all necessary attributes of the target channel (that is, downlink synchronisation is achieved and uplink access procedures, if applicable, are successfully completed) are known at initiation of the handover from the serving channel to the target channel.
Submission Slide 17 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Test environment**
IMT.TECH - 4.8 Voip Capacity
TABLE 6
VoIP Capacity
Min VoIP capacity (Active users/sector/MHz)
Indoor
Microcellular
Base coverage urban
High speed
50
40
40
30
VoIP capacity was derived assuming a 12.2 kbps codec with a 50% activity factor such that the percentage of users in outage is less than 2% where a user is defined to have experienced a voice outage if less than 98% of the VoIP packets have been delivered successfully to the user within a one way radio access delay bound of 50 ms.
Submission Slide 18 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
•
•
•
IMT-ADV Evaluation (Temp 90)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ITU-R IMT-ADV/3 Report Contents
Section 4 - ITU-R Reference documents
Section 5 - Describes the evaluation guidelines.
Section 6 - Lists the criteria chosen for evaluating the RITs. (Table 6-1)
Section 7 - Outlines the procedures and evaluation methodology for evaluating the criteria.
Section 8 - Defines the tests environments and selected deployment scenarios for evaluation.
Section 9 - Describes a channel model approach for the evaluation.
Section 10 - Channel Model Technical references.
Technical Guidance Annexes:
Annex 1:
Annex 2:
Annex 3:
Test environments and reference channel models
Traffic models
Link budget template
Submission Slide 19 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.EVAL Section 6 Characteristics for Evaluation
Table 6-1 Evaluation methods and configurations
Characteristic for Evaluation
Cell spectral efficiency
Peak spectral efficiency
Bandwidth
Cell edge user spectral efficiency
Method
Simulation (system level)
Analytical
Inspection
Simulation (system level)
Evaluation methodology / configurations
Section 7.1.1; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5
Section 7.3.1; Table 8-3
Section 7.4.1
Section 7.1.2; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-5
Control plane latency
User plane latency
Mobility
Intra- and inter-frequency handover interruption time
Inter-system handover
VoIP Capacity
Analytical
Analytical
Simulation (system and link level)
Analytical
Inspection
Simulation (system level)
Inspection Deployment possible in at least one of the identified IMT bands
Channel bandwidth scalability Inspection
Support for a wide range of services Inspection
Section 7.3.2; Table 8-2
Section 7.3.3; Table 8-2
Section 7.2; Table 8-2 and 8-7
Section 7.3.4; Table 8-2
Section 7.4.3
Section 7.1.3; Table 8-2, 8-4 and 8-6
Section 7.4.2
Section 7.4.1
Section 7.4.4
Submission Slide 20 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
IMT.EVAL Section 8 Test Environments & Evaluation Configurations
Table 8-2 Baseline evaluation and configuration parameters
Deployment scenario for the evaluation process
Base Station (BS) antenna height
Number of BS antenna elements [1]
Total BS TX power at antenna feedpoint
User Terminal (UT) power class
UT antenna system
(see the footnote) 1
Minimum distance between UT and serving cell [2]
Carrier Frequency (CF) for evaluation
(representative of IMT bands)
Outdoor to Indoor building penetration loss
Outdoor to in-car penetration loss
Submission
Urban macro-cell Urban micro-cell Indoor hotspot
25 m, above rooftop
Up to 8 rx
Up to 8 tx
46dBm for 10MHz,
49dBm for 20MHz
24dBm
Up to 2 tx
Up to 2 rx
>= 25 meters
2GHz
N.A.
9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
10 m, below rooftop
Up to 8 rx
Up to 8 tx
41 dBm for 10MHz,
44 dBm for 20MHz
24dBm
Up to 2 tx
Up to 2 rx
>= 10 meters
2.5 GHz see Annex 1 Table
A1-1
N.A.
Slide 21
6 m, mounted on ceiling
Up to 8 rx
Up to 8 tx
24dBm for 40 MHz,
21 dBm for 20 MHz
21dBm
Up to 2 tx
Up to 2 rx
>= 3 meters
3.4 GHz
N.A.
N.A.
Rural macro-cell
35 m, above rooftop
Up to 8 rx
Up to 8 tx
46dBm for 10MHz,
49dBm for 20MHz
24dBm
Up to 2 tx
Up to 2 rx
>= 35 meters
800 MHz
N.A.
9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
Suburban macro-cell
35 m, above rooftop
Up to 8 rx
Up to 8 tx
46dBm for 10MHz,
49dBm for 20MHz
24dBm
Up to 2 tx
Up to 2 rx
>= 35 meters
Same as Urban macro-cell
20 dB
9 dB (LN, σ = 5 dB)
Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008
•
doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Submission Slide 22 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
•
–
–
–
–
–
Objectives of the workshop to provide common understanding of the process for IMT-Advanced standardization including technical requirements and evaluation guidelines. In particular, it will enable those not directly involved with the Circular Letter works to understand procedures better.
to observe current and future development aspects of IMT-Advanced Radio
Interface technology by development parties to exchange the views among possible proponents for consensus building of the possible candidate IMT-Advanced RITS to share IMT-Advanced market and regulatory aspects for the introduction of the
IMT-Advance to promote more participation from developing countries into the WP5D activities,
Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee
Submission Slide 23 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Expected Agenda Topics of the workshop
–
Procedure and requirements of IMT-Advanced standardization
–
Possible Candidate IMT-Advanced RITs
– Market and Regulatory Aspects
– Needs of Developing Countries
Ref: TEMP/82E coordinator Dr K. J. Wee
Submission Slide 24 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008
Submission
GROUP
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D
WP 5D doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
9
10
7
8
11
12
No.
1
4
5
2
3
6
WP5D Meeting Schedule
START
28 Jan-08
24 Jun-08
08-Oct-08
11 Feb-09
10 Jun-09
14 Oct-09
17 Feb-10
9 Jun-10
13 Oct-10
16 Feb-11
15 Jun-11
12 Oct-11
STOP
1 Feb-08
1 Jul-08
15-Oct-08
18 Feb-09
17 Jun-09
21 Oct-09
24 Feb-10
16 Jun-10
20 Oct-10
23 Feb-11
22 Jun-11
19 Oct-11
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
PLACE
Geneva
UAE
Korea
[India]
[Germany]
[China]
Slide 25 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008
GROUP
SG5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
No.
SG5 Meeting Schedule
START
10 Nov-08
STOP
11 Nov-08
PLACE
Geneva
Submission Slide 26 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)

July 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0752r0
Mr. C. GLASS Mr. A. HASHIMOTO
Chairman, Study Group 5
Japan - NTT DoCoMo, Inc.
Wireless Technology Standardization Dept
Mr. T.K.A. ALEGE
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Nigeria - Department of State Services
Mr. A. CHANDRA
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
India - Ministry of Communications & IT
Mr. J.M. COSTA
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Acting Chairman, Working Party 5A
Canada - Nortel Networks
Mr. T. EWERS
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Acting Chairman, Working Party 5B
Germany - Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas
Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Acting Chairman, Working Party 5C
US - Department of Commerce – NTIA
Mr. A. JAMIESON
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Added Value Applications Ltd.
New Zealand
Mr. A. KLYUCHAREV
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Russian Federation - General Radio Frequency Centre
Mme L. SOUSSI
VicePrésidente, Commission d'études 5
Tunisia Agence Nationale des Fréquences
Mr. L. SUN
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
China - Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Mr. K.-J. WEE
Vice-Chairman, Study Group 5
Korea - Ministry of Information and Communication
Radio Research Laboratory
Submission Slide 27 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell); Darwin Engwer (Nortel)