Strong interference case from an adjacent Femtocell
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/0631r1
Date Submitted: 2009-03-02
Source:
Mamadou Kone, Ming-Hung Tao, Ying-Chuan Hsiao
ITRI
Email: itri404759@itri.org.tw
Venue:
IEEE Session #60, Vancouver, Canada
Base Contributions:
Re:
CR for tgmsdd
Purpose:
Notice:
Discussion and Approval
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in
the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein.
Release:
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an
IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s
sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this
contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
Patent Policy:
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures:
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>.
Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat .
Motivation
• MS under strong interference poses challenging
interference mitigation issues
• The Section 17.8 propose some solutions:
– MS to report the interference to the serving BS
– The serving BS and/or the network may request the
interfering Femtocell BS to mitigate the interference
• However none of this solution addresses the
following scenario:
– MS may not be able to access the network at all
– MS may be able to report but still the communication of
two femto BSs over the air is not defined…
2
First case: MS has no access to the network
• Therefore MS cannot report the interference back to its serving BS
FBS2
MS1
FBS1
Back Haul communication
Second case: MS has a weak interference
• MS may be able to report the interference, but the serving BS cannot join
with the interfering BS
– No air interface between two Femto BSs
– If different provider, so no backhaul communication
– Which femto BS should block its resource?
Back Haul communication
No air interface communication
MS1
FBS1
FBS2
First case solution: Use interfering Femto BS
• Femto BS detects an MS A-Preamble over the air
– Decode the A-Preamble to find out the serving BS ID
– Use the backhaul to communicate with the serving BS to
mitigate interference
– If not belonging to the same provider, femtoBS may use
the back haul to inform Macro BS of the matter to resolve
the interference issue.
• Propose to make a change of the subsection “17.4.2
Femto BS detection” to solve that matter.
5
Second case solution: Use the network to
resolve the interference
• A femto BS is informed by its MS of the existence of
adjacent interfering femto BS:
– Femto BS contact the Macro BS through the back haul
– The network is informed of the situation
• The network solve properly this kind of issue by
contacting the different femto BS:
– Redefine their resources profiles by blocking some to avoid
interference
– Contact onf of them to reduce its transmission power if
necessary.
6
Suggested Text
Insert the following paragraph into Section 17.8, on page 136.
--------Start of Text--------17.4.2 Femtocell BS detection
A Femtocell BS may monitor UL signal from an MS which is served by overlay macro BS/
Femtocell BS. The monitoring is initiated by overlay macro BS to detect the existence of the
MS in its coverage. Then the Femtocell BS can inform the macro BS over the backhaul that
the MS is in its coverage and subsequently handover to Femtocell BS or interference
mitigation can be accomplished.
17.8 Interference Avoidance and Interference Mitigation
Large interference from an inaccessible Femtocell may trigger the interfering femto BS to
report the MS’s femto BS ID to Macro BS. Then the network may redefine the two femto BS
resources configuration and or request to one of them to mitigate the interference by reducing
transmission power.
7