Discussion of Explicit vs. Implicit PC-A-MAP IE Assignment (15.2.3)

advertisement
Discussion of Explicit vs. Implicit PC-A-MAP IE Assignment
(15.2.3)
IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9)
Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/2584
Date Submitted:
2009-11-06
Source:
Yi Hsuan, Rongzhen Yang, Hujun Yin
Intel Corporation
Venue:.
IEEE 802.16m: “802.16m/D2 letter ballot”
Target topic: P802.16M/D2 - 15.2.3
Purpose:
Notice:
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in
the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein.
Release:
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an
IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s
sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this
contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
Patent Policy:
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures:
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>.
Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.
Background
• In current P802.16M/D2, the text of PC-A-MAP IE
assignment for CLPC is not ready;
• In previous meetings, the implicit assignment methods
were proposed (C80216m-09/1054 and C80216m09/1903):
– It claims the benefit for signaling overhead saving
– But it limits the flexibility of PC-A-MAP IE assignment for period,
power adjust step and CLPC enable/disable;
• Here we share our study of 16m CLPC usages, to
identify the suitable solution for PC-A-MAP IE
assignment.
Evaluation Setting
• Key Assumption:
– CLPC should at least support power tracking at for
different speed:
• Three moving speeds are selected for analysis: 3km/h,
30km/h and 120km/h with 16m e-ITU channel;
• It is considered as “following” of CLPC when error is less
than deltastep/2; (deltastep = 0.5 dB);
• Evaluation Parameters Setting:
– Set different periods for CLPC control rate for different
moving speeds, to identify the minimum period of
each scenarios;
– Set different CLPC power adjust step (deltastep) for
different moving speeds, to identify the best step size
of each scenarios;
Moving Speed: 3km/h
Example of Power Tracking
Absolute Error CDF
1
9
10frame
Shadowing
8
0.9
10frame
20frame
20frame
30frame
0.8
30frame
6
0.7
5
0.6
F(Error)
dB
7
4
0.5
3
0.4
2
0.3
1
0.2
0
0.1
0
-1
0
100
200
300
Time(s)
400
500
600
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Error
• CLPC Power Control Step Size (0.5dB) of 2 bits: -0.5, 0, +0.5, 1 dB
• Period of 20 frames with 0.5dB adjust step can effectively tracking
channel fading (following probability with 90%)
Moving Speed: 30km/h
Absolute Error CDF of
Step Size (0.5dB) of 2 bits: -0.5, 0, +0.5, 1 dB
Absolute Error CDF of
Step Size (1dB) of 2 bits: -1, 0, +1, 2 dB
1
1
2frame
1frame
0.9
0.9
2frame
4frame
8frame
3frame
0.8
4frame
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
F(Error)
F(Error)
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
2
4
6
8
Error
10
12
14
0
2
4
6
8
10
Error
• 2 choices can meet 90% following requirement:
– Period of 2 frames with 0.5dB adjust step
– Period of 5 frame with 1dB adjust step
12
Moving Speed: 120km/h
Absolute Error CDF of
Update Period 1 Frame
Absolute Error CDF of
Update Period 2 Frame
1
1
0.5dB
0.9
0.5dB
0.9
1dB
1dB
2dB
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
F(Error)
F(Error)
2dB
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
2
4
6
Error
8
10
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
Error
• CLPC Power change in every frame is needed
• Adjust step 1dB (-1, 0, +1, 2) is better than
0.5dB & 2dB
12
Summary of CLPC
Power Tracking Evaluation
• The CLPC power control rate should be
configurable for the different MS.
• The CLPC power control change step can be
configurable for the different MS, 2 options are
enough: minimum step = 0.5 or 1 dB.
• Current implicit assignment cannot support
upper 2 requirements.
Supporting of Open Loop and Closed Loop Coupling
High Traffic
Fast control
Slow control
Fast
control
Slow control
Fast control
• Coupling of Open Loop and Closed Loop Power Control is defined
at SDD 11.10.2.3:
– Open Loop Power Control coarsely adjust uplink transmit power with
low signaling overhead
– When there is high traffic, Closed loop will be the main power control
scheme
• Explicit vs. Implicit Assignment:
– Explicit Assignment can implement it easily by a field of Assignment
Duration (frames)
– Currently, there is no implicit assignment method that can support it.
Recommendation
• PC-A-MAP IE Assignment should be
explicit to include at least 3 fields:
– Control Rate (assignment period)
– Power Change Step: 1 bit field to indicate 0.5
or 1 dB
– Assignment Duration: the begin and the end
of assignment
• The proposed text in contribution xxxx and
its latest version is recommended.
Download