November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence Lessons Learned
Date: 2014-11-01
Authors:
Name
Company
Paul Nikolich
IEEE 802
Chair
Steve Shellhammer Qualcomm
Stanislav Filin
NICT
Andrew Myles
Cisco
Systems
Cisco
Systems
Peter Ecclesine
Address
Phone
E-mail
Montclair NJ
(857) 205-0050
p.nikolich@ieee.org
5775 Morehouse Dr
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 658-1874
shellhammer@ieee.org
sfilin@nict.go.jp
Austraia
+61 2 84461010 amyles@cisco.com
170 W. Tasman Dr.,
San Jose, CA 95134
+1-408-5270815
pecclesi@cisco.com
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in
this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE
Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit
others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.19.
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement
"IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents
essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to
reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair
<shellhammer@ieee.org> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being
developed within the IEEE 802.19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>.
Submission
Slide 1
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Abstract
• This document is intended to be presented to 3GPP, in
response to a request from 3GPP to IEEE 802 on the
Coexistence Lessons Learned within IEEE 802
Submission
Slide 2
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802 Documents
• References are made to both IEEE 802 standards and
802 working documents
• IEEE 802 standards are available for free, 6 months
after publication, under the IEEE Get program at:
– http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/
• IEEE 802 working documents (except draft standards)
are available on the IEEE 802 Mentor web site
– https://mentor.ieee.org/802/bp/StartPage
Submission
Slide 3
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Presentation Outline
• Part 1 – Feedback on 3GPP Document RP-141664
• Part 2 – IEEE 802 Coexistence Lessons Learned
–
–
–
–
–
IEEE 802.11 Coexistence Lessons Learned
IEEE 802.15.2 Coexistence Lessons Learned
IEEE 802.16h Coexistence Lessons Learned
IEEE 802.22 Coexistence Lessons Learned
New IEEE 802.19.1 standard for TVWS coexistence
• Part 3 – Backup
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Submission
Coexistence History in IEEE 802
Coexistence Scenarios and Metrics
Examples of Coexistence Assurance Documents
Coexistence Mechanisms: IEEE 802.11, 802.15.2, 802.16h, and 802.22
Overview of 802.19.1 Standard for TVWS Coexistence
IEEE 802 Coexistence Process
References
Slide 4
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Part 1 – Feedback on 3GPP Document
RP-141664
Submission
Slide 5
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Feedback on 3GPP Document RP-141664
• 3GPP has identified fairness as the key challenge for
successful spectrum sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi
• 3GPP has identified a useful initial definition of fairness
• Fairness is important to IEEE 802 and 3GPP
• LBT provides a useful starting point for fair sharing
between LAA and Wi-Fi
• IEEE 802 wants to work with 3GPP to achieve consensus
on Wi-Fi/LAA sharing
Submission
Slide 6
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
3GPP has identified fairness as the key challenge for
successful spectrum sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi
• 3GPP doc. RP-141664 has identified the importance of fairness and
defined fairness in the context of LAA LTE and Wi-Fi as follows:
– “Identify and define design targets for coexistence with other unlicensed
spectrum deployments, including fairness with respect to Wi-Fi and other
LAA services.”
• IEEE 802 agrees that fairness is vital for successful sharing of
unlicensed spectrum between LAA LTE and Wi-Fi
• Fairness is in “the eye of the beholder” and so the challenge for
3GPP and IEEE 802 is to agree on a definition of fairness
• The IEEE 802 notes this challenge could also be applied to sharing
between LAA LTE and other systems
Submission
Slide 7
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
3GPP has identified a useful initial
definition of fairness
• 3GPP doc. RP-141664 has highlighted a potential definition of
fairness for spectrum sharing between LAA LTE and Wi-Fi
– “This should be captured in terms of relevant fair sharing metrics, e.g.,
that LAA should not impact Wi-Fi services (data, video and voice
services) more than an additional Wi-Fi network on the same carrier; these
metrics could include throughput, latency, jitter etc.”
• IEEE 802 supports this conceptual definition of fairness as the
basis for further discussion between 3GPP and IEEE 802
• This definition effectively treats LAA LTE and Wi-Fi as having
equal standing in access to the spectrum, which is aligned with the
intent of the regulatory authorities in most countries
• Detailed system-level simulation scenarios will need to be specified
that incorporate the throughput, latency and jitter metrics
Submission
Slide 8
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Fairness is important to IEEE 802
• The success of unlicensed spectrum (2.4 and 5 GHz) has
been underpinned by the use of fair sharing mechanisms
• There are billions of IEEE 802.11 devices that make use of
these mechanisms
• New IEEE 802.11 devices are increasingly being deployed
in 5 GHz spectrum to satisfy a wide variety of important
use cases
• These IEEE 802.11 devices will be adversely affected by
another system that does not support fair sharing
mechanisms
• Equally, other systems would be adversely affected if IEEE
802.11 devices stopped using fair sharing mechanisms
Submission
Slide 9
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Fairness is important to 3GPP
• Many 3GPP operators today currently leverage the
benefits of Wi-Fi and want to continue to do so in the
future
• The market and regulators have an expectation of fair
sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi, and will expect that
LAA will not diminish the ongoing and expanded use of
Wi-Fi in the 5 GHz band
• Indeed, the doc. RP-141664 recognizes that, … it is not
enough to minimize interference simply for regulatory
aspects. It is also essential to insure that a deployed
system will operate as a “good neighbor”
Submission
Slide 10
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
LBT provides a useful starting point for fair
sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi
• 3GPP doc. RP-141664 highlights the use of LBT as a coexistence
mechanism that is often used to achieve fairness
– “In some regions in the world, unlicensed technologies need to abide to
certain regulations, e.g. Listen-Before-Talk (LBT). Fair coexistence between
LTE and other technologies such as Wi-Fi as well as between LTE operators
is seen necessary.”
• IEEE 802 notes that LBT has a long history of success in promoting
sharing between non-coordinated systems in unlicensed spectrum and
has wide acceptance as a coexistence mechanism from regulators
• IEEE 802 supports using the LBT coexistence mechanism as a useful
starting point for sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi, particularly as it
is required by regulations in Europe
• IEEE 802 acknowledges that there may be other coexistence
mechanisms for sharing between LAA and Wi-Fi, and is willing to
discuss them as they are proposed
Submission
Slide 11
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802 wants to work with 3GPP to achieve
consensus on Wi-Fi/LAA sharing
• IEEE would like the opportunity to review the 3GPP coexistence
simulation studies and provide feedback
• IEEE 802 would also like to review a range of documents throughout the
period of the study item
• Examples of information 802 is interested in reviewing include,
–
–
–
–
–
The SI schedule as it develops
Details of the fairness criteria
The simulation scenarios
The LBT related parameters
The simulation methodology
• Our goal is for IEEE 802 and 3GPP to build towards a consensus on the
best way for LAA to fairly share the same spectrum with 802.11 systems
Submission
Slide 12
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Part 2 – IEEE 802 Coexistence
Lessons Learned
Submission
Slide 13
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.11 Coexistence Lessons Learned
• CSMA/CA works in ISM bands (such as 2.4 and 5.8 GHz
band) where there is uncontrolled energy in the band
• IEEE 802.11 attempted to use TDMA-type systems (PCF
and HCCA), and they have failed in the marketplace for a
variety of reasons
– It is impractical to coordinate access between low-cost independent
systems, particularly for mobile devices moving across networks
– The performance provided by CSMA/CA has proven to be good enough
for the vast majority of use cases
• Licensed-exempt wireless systems cannot rely on the
guaranteed reception of radio management and control
traffic
Submission
Slide 14
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.15.2 Coexistence Lessons Learned
• IEEE 802.15.2 [2] standardizes coexistence methods for
IEEE 802.15.1 (Bluetooth) with other wireless systems
in the 2.4 GHz frequency band
• Multiple coexistence techniques are included in IEEE
802.15.2 to enable 802.15.1 to coexist with 802.11
– Several tables are provides in the Backup slides giving a brief
overview of these mechanisms
• One of the most powerful coexistence mechanisms
included is adaptive frequency hopping (AFH) in which
802.15.1 “hops over” a nearby 802.11 WLAN
• AFH has shown to be very effective
• AFH was subsequently integrated into the Bluetooth
specification
Submission
Slide 15
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.16h Coexistence Lessons Learned
• IEEE 802.16 is time-division duplex (TDD) system
based on Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple
Access (OFDMA)
• IEEE 802.16h [4] is an amendment to the 802.16
standard on “Improved Coexistence Mechanisms for
Licensed-Exempt Operation”
• One band considered for 802.16h operation is the 36503700 MHz band, also considered for 802.11y operation
• During the development of 802.16h a coexistence
assurance document [5] was developed which studied
the coexistence of 802.16h and 802.11y
Submission
Slide 16
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.16h Coexistence Lessons Learned
• Note: Of all the 802 systems, 802.16h is the closest
analog to LTE in unlicensed bands
• The time-synchronization requirements of 802.16h
systems are incompatible with deployed 802.11 systems
• Coordination access requires a high-cost high-speed
control channel between 802.16h and 802.11 systems,
which is impractical
• Coordination of policy between 802.16h and multiple
802.11 systems does not work since each 802.11 system
is independent
Submission
Slide 17
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.22 Coexistence Lessons Learned
• IEEE 802.22 is a wireless regional area network
(WRAN) standard for operation in the TVWS
• Two or more WRAN networks may be running in the
same area and be managed by different operators
• Two coexistence mechanisms are included in the
standard
– Spectrum etiquette is used to select orthogonal primary and
secondary channels when sufficient channels are available
– Frame-based on-demand spectrum contention is used when a
single TVWS channel must be shared
• Additional detail is provides in the backup slides
Submission
Slide 18
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.22 Coexistence Lessons Learned
• In the TVWS there are special requirements for geolocation and database access in a master device within
the network
• In the TVWS these capabilities can be combined with
an external database to enable coexistence, however,
there has not yet been sufficient deployment in the
TVWS to require any coexistence solutions beyond the
spectrum etiquette
• A definition of fairness is necessary in order to design a
fair coexistence mechanism
Submission
Slide 19
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
New IEEE 802.19.1 Standard for TVWS Coexistence
• With the FCC and other regulatory agencies opening up
unused TV white space spectrum for unlicensed use
multiple protocols may be standardized for TVWS
operation
• The IEEE took a proactive step to address TVWS
coexistence by developing a standard
• The standard utilizes two unique capabilities of TVWS
networks
– Location awareness
– Access to Geo-location database
• An overview of the 802.19.1 standard is given in the
backup
Submission
Slide 20
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Conclusions
• NOTE: NEED TO FILL OUT CONCLUSIONS SLIDE
Submission
Slide 21
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Part 3 – Backup
Submission
Slide 22
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence History in IEEE 802
• The issue of coexistence between IEEE 802 standard
began with the standardization of IEEE 802.15.1 (i.e.
Bluetooth)
– Appendix F in 802.11-1997 standard addressed coexistence of
frequency hopping and direct sequence in the 2.4 GHz band
– The 802.15 working group was established in July 1999
– Both 802.11b and 802.15.1 operate in the 2.4 GHz ISM band
– Formed Task Group 2 on Coexistence of 802.11 and 802.15.1
in March 2000
– IEEE 802.15.2 was published in 2003
– Adaptive Frequency Hopping was later incorporated in to
Bluetooth Specification
Submission
Slide 23
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence History in IEEE 802
• IEEE 802.19 Coexistence Technical Advisory Group
– IEEE 802 decided that it needed a technical advisory group (TAG)
on wireless coexistence, that was not within any one of the individual
WGs, but would operate at the 802 level. Formed TAG in 2002
– IEEE 802 developed rules on coexistence for new projects in 2004
• When a new project is proposed to the IEEE 802 Executive
Committee the working group is required to state if the working
group will develop a Coexistence Assurance (CA) document
along with the draft standard
• If the WG commits to developing a CA document, then the WG is
required to produce a CA document which is to be reviewed by
the WG and 802.19 during WG letter ballot
– A number of CA documents have been produced since 2006
– Details of the process provided in subsequent slides
Submission
Slide 24
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence History in IEEE 802
• IEEE 802.19.1
– In 2009 a new project was initiated focusing on coexistence
in the TV white space (TVWS)
– This standard leverages the inherent cognitive capabilities of
TVWS devices including location awareness and ability to
access on-line databases
– The 802.19.1 standard was published in 2014
Submission
Slide 25
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence History in IEEE 802
Years
Coexistence Work
1997
IEEE 802.11 Appendix F addressing coexistence of frequency
hopping and direct sequence systems in 2.4 GHz band
2002
Formation of IEEE 802.19
2003
IEEE 802.15.2 Recommended Practice on Coexistence of
WPAN devices with other devices in Unlicensed Frequency
Bands
2006 – Present
Coexistence Assurance (CA) Documents
• IEEE 802.11 – Six CA documents
• IEEE 802.15 – Twelve CA documents
• IEEE 802.16 – One CA document
To Present
General coexistence methods and self coexistence methods
in MAC/PHY standards
• 802.11, 802.15 802.16h and 802.22
2014
IEEE 802.19.1 Standard on TVWS Coexistence Methods
Submission
Slide 26
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence Scenarios
• In the evaluation of coexistence between wireless networks of different
standards one must consider various coexistence scenarios and
coexistence metrics
• Coexistence Scenarios - Specify Network Parameters of the two (or
more) networks
– Number of network devices
– Location of each of the network devices
• Deterministic Geometry or Stochastic Geometry
– Transmit power of the network devices
– Bandwidth and center frequency of network devices
– Statistics of channel occupancy of each of the networks
– Statistics of data traffic on each of the networks
– Protocol parameters
• Some are specified in standard, like carrier sense threshold
• Some are implementation specific, like rate adaptation algorithm
Submission
Slide 27
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Simple Geometric Example
• In an unlicensed band the
user may not be able to
control the physical
separation of devices of the
two different networks
• Specify geometry as a
function of the separation (d)
• Evaluate coexistence metrics
as a function of the
separation (d)
• Primary interference is
between WLAN STA and
WPAN Node 1
Submission
WLAN AP
d
WLAN STA
WPAN Node 1
WPAN Node 2
Slide 28
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Stochastic Example
• Randomly place devices from each network in a given
region with a specified density
• Placement of Base Stations or Access Points depend on
how those devices are deployed (by operator or
consumer)
• Evaluate coexistence metrics as function of the density
of the two networks, which may have different densities
Submission
Slide 29
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Coexistence Metrics
• There are a number of coexistence metrics that can be
studied when evaluating the coexistence of two
networks. Typically these are network performance
metrics. Examples include,
– Network Throughput (e.g. median and 10th percentile)
– Network Latency (e.g. median and 90th percentile)
– Packet Error Rate
Submission
Slide 30
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Examples from Coexistence Assurance
Documents
• A number of coexistence assurance documents have
been developed in IEEE 802 to show how well new
standards coexist with current standards
• These documents are available on the web at,
– http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/19/pub/ca.htm
• One nice example is the CA document for 802.15.4k
which specifies several PHY for Low Energy, Critical
Infrastructure Monitoring Networks (LECIM)
Submission
Slide 31
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Example CA Document: 802.15.4k CA Doc
• IEEE 802.15.4k supports multiple frequency bands
• CA document summarizes which other systems operate
in these bands
• CA document specifies a fixed geometry of the victim
network and varies the interference level, based on
distance between interferer and victim node and path
loss model
• Simulations of co-channel interference are performed
– Plotted bit error rate (BER) and Frame error rate (FER) versus
distance between interferer and victim
• Considered both 802.15.4k interference on other
systems and interference of other systems on 802.15.4k
Submission
Slide 32
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.11 Coexistence Mechanisms
• The IEEE 802.11 MAC is based on a carrier sense multiple access
(CSMA) technology
• IEEE 802.11 CSMA include two sensing techniques:
– Carrier sense for 802.11 Frames
– Energy Detection for other systems
•
The threshold for energy detection is typically set at a higher
power level than 802.11 Frame detection since energy detection at
very low power levels is typically unreliable
• Clause 18 of the 802.11 standard [1] specifies the energy detection
threshold limits for the OFDM PHY
Submission
Channel Bandwidth
ED Threshold Limit
20 MHz
ED_Thresh ≤ -62 dBm
10 MHz
ED_Thresh ≤ -65 dBm
5 MHz
ED_Thresh ≤ -68 dBm
Slide 33
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.15.2 Coexistence Mechanisms
• IEEE 802.15.2 was developed to address the coexistence
of IEEE 802.11 and 802.15.1 (Bluetooth)
• A number of coexistence mechanism are included in the
standard. A table is provides on the next few slides
• One of the primary mechanisms, adaptive frequency
hopping (AFH), was later adopted in the Bluetooth
specification
• Additional information about coexistence mechanisms
including simulation results available in [2]
Submission
Slide 34
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.15.2 Coexistence Mechanisms
Coexistence Mechanism
Description
Alternative Wireless
Medium Access (AWMA)
A time division multiplexing scheme to be used when
802.15.1 master is collocated in the same devices as one of
the 802.11 STAs. Since 802.15.1 slaves transmissions are
set by 802.15.1 master no changes are required in the
802.15.1 slaves.
Packet Traffic Arbitration
(PTA)
Specifies a packet traffic arbitration unit in a device that
contains both a 802.11 STA and an 802.15.1 node. Based
on priorities when there is a potential TX scheduling
overlap 802.11 or 802.15.1 packets are transmitted, under
the control of the PTA unit
Deterministic interference
suppression
Through a collocated 802.11 STA and 802.15.1 node, the
802.11 STA can know the frequency hopping sequence.
The 802.11 STA receiver introduces a dynamic notch filter
to suppress the interfering 802.15.1 transmission
Submission
Slide 35
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.15.2 Coexistence Mechanisms
Coexistence Mechanism
Description
Adaptive interference
suppression
Unlike deterministic interference suppression, this
approach does not require knowledge of the frequency
hopping sequence. This technique estimates the
narrowband interference and subtracts the interferer. This
technique requires some delay to estimate and subtract the
narrowband interferer
Adaptive Packet Selection
Intelligent scheduling of 802.15.1 SCO and ACL packet
transmissions to optimize network throughput and as a
result minimize channel occupancy, hence improving
coexistence
Packet scheduling for ACL
links
Scheduling of ACL packets to occur on channel
frequencies which do not cause interference to 802.11 STA
Adaptive Frequency
Hopping (AFH)
Modify the frequency hopping sequence by eliminating
channels which cause interference to 802.11 STA
Submission
Slide 36
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.16h Coexistence Mechanisms
• The 802.16h base station collects information about interference
from the subscriber stations
• Candidate Channel and Master Frame Assessment (CCMFA) is
used to evaluate candidate channels, based on passive scanning,
which has low interference
• A coexistence frame (CX-Frame) is introduced which is based on
two time intervals
– Coordinated Coexistence Schedule Based Interval (CXXBI)
– Coordinated Coexistence Contention Based Interval (CXCBI)
• For a simulation coexistence analysis see document [5]
Submission
Slide 37
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.22 Self-Coexistence Mechanisms
MAC self-coexistence schemes
PHY coexistence mechanisms
Orthogonal channel selection
for operating channel and first
backup channel
Spectrum Etiquette
Spectrum
etiquette
Two or more cells
need to coexist on
the same channel
On-demand
frame
contention
Frame allocation signalled
by the super-frame control
header (SCH)
Frame-based On-demand
Frame contention
Spectrum contention
Enough channels
available
Coexistence beacon protocol
(Exchange of information between BSs through CPEs
using the self-coexistence window)
• Slides on 802.22 from [7]
Submission
Slide 38
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.22 Self-Coexistence Mechanisms
• Spectrum Etiquette
•
Orthogonal channel assignment scheme between adjacent cells
– different operating channel for overlapping or adjacent cells
– different first backup channel
Incumbents are arrived
at CH # 1 and 2
Requires that information on operating, backup and candidate channels
of each cell is shared amongst WRAN cells: exchanged by CBP packets [5]
6, 4, 2, 5, 7
6, 4, 2, 5
8, 5, 2, 4, 7
8, 5, 2, 4
1
3, 7, 2, 5, 8
1, 2, 7
4, 8, 2, 6, 7
3, 4, 2, 6, 7
3, 2, 5, 8
5, 6, 2, 7, 8
2
4, 8, 2, 6
(a)
3, 4, 6
7, 5
5, 6, 2, 8
(b)
New Backup Channel Number
New Operating Channel Number
Candidate Channel number
Candidate Channel number
Backup Channel Number
Operating Channel Number
Submission
Slide 39
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802.22 Self-Coexistence Mechanisms
• On-demand Frame Contention
•
Two or more cells need to co-exist on the same channel
160 ms
...
Superframe n-1
Superframe n
Superframe n+1
... Time
SCW
WRAN Cell 1
FCH
SCH frame 0
10 ms
No Tx
10 ms
No Tx
frame 1
10 ms
frame 2
10 ms
10 ms
...
No Tx
...
10 ms
frame N
10 ms
WRAN Cell 2
No Tx
SCH frame 0
No Tx
No Tx
No Tx
No Tx
...
...
No Tx
WRAN Cell 3
No Tx
No Tx
SCH frame 0
No Tx
No Tx
frame 1
...
...
No Tx
Using SCW, BS exchange CBPs and
decides next frame owner using contention
SCW does not have to be allocated at each frame
Super-frame N+1 (16 Frames)
Super-frame N (16 Frames)
TV Channel
Cell 1
X
Cell 2
Cell 3
…
Cell 3
Cell 1
Cell 2
Cell 1
Cell 1
…
Cell 2
Cell 3
…
time
Submission
Slide 40
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Background
• Radio regulations in some countries allow secondary
radio systems to operate in TV white spaces
• White spaces are not exclusively assigned to a particular
radio system, any system that fulfils the requirements of
the radio regulation can operate
• Correspondingly, there is a need for coexistence
mechanisms between different white space radio
systems
• IEEE 802.19.1 [6] has addressed this need by developing
standard for TV white space coexistence methods
Submission
Slide 41
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
System architecture
IEEE 802.19.1 scope
CDIS
TVWS DB
CM
CM
CE
CE
CE
CE
WS Radio
WS Radio
WS Radio
WS Radio
Interface defined in IEEE 802.19.1
Interface not defined in IEEE 802.19.1
CDIS – Coexistence Discovery and Information Server TVWS DB – TV whitespace database
CM – Coexistence Manager
WS Radio – whitespace radio
CE – Coexistence Enabler
Submission
Slide 42
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Coexistence discovery
• Coexistence Discovery and Information Server (CDIS)
supports discovery of the neighboring white space radio
systems
– Two white space radio systems are neighbors if they are likely to
cause one-way or mutual harmful interference to one another if they
operate on the same frequency channel
• Coexistence discovery information serves as an input to
coexistence decisions making
Submission
Slide 43
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Coexistence decision making
• The IEEE standard 802.19.1 provides two ways to
select parameters of a radio system
– Information service – coexistence system provides neighbor
discovery information to a white space radio system and the white
space radio system autonomously updates its operating parameters
– Management service – coexistence system manages the operating
parameters of a white space radio system using Coexistence
Manager (CM)
• These services are provided by the IEEE 802.19.1
coexistence system to subscribed white space radio
systems
Submission
Slide 44
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Common normative part
System architecture and reference model
Procedures
Data types, primitives, messages
Profile-dependent normative part
Profiles interoperability mechanisms
Profile 1
Profile 2
Profile 3
Informative part
Coexistence discovery algorithms
Coexistence decision making algorithms
Submission
Slide 45
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Performance improvement
300
3 TV channels, no 802.19.1
3 TV channels, 802.19.1
Total throughput, Mb/s
250
5 TV channels, no 802.19.1
200
5 TV channels, 802.19.1
150
100
50
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Input traffic, Mb/s
• Gain in throughput is 17% for 3 TV channels
• Gain in throughput is 21% for 5 TV channels
Submission
Slide 46
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
Overview of IEEE 802.19.1
Summary
• IEEE 802.19.1 is standard that defines coexistence
system for radio systems operating in TV whitespace
• IEEE 802.19.1 coexistence system can provide different
level of services to the users based on their subscription
• Different profiles are defined to support various
deployment scenarios and use cases
• Simulation shows performance improvement from
using IEEE 802.19.1 coexistence system
• Implementation of the IEEE 802.19.1 coexistence
system was done for feasibility study of the developed
protocol (see IEEE 802.19-12/138r0 for more details)
Submission
Slide 47
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802 Coexistence Process (1 of 2)
• The IEEE 802 Operations Manual includes a procedure on
Coexistence Assurance
– http://www.ieee802.org/PNP/approved/IEEE_802_OM_v15.pdf
13. Procedure for coexistence assurance
• If indicated in the five criteria, the wireless WG shall produce a
coexistence assurance (CA) document in the process of preparing
for WG letter ballot and Sponsor ballot. The CA document shall
accompany the draft on all wireless WG letter ballots.
• The CA document shall address coexistence with all relevant
approved IEEE 802 LMSC wireless standards specifying devices for
unlicensed operation. The WG should consider other specifications
in their identified target band(s) in the CA document.
Submission
Slide 48
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
IEEE 802 Coexistence Process (2 of 2)
13. Procedure for coexistence assurance (cont.)
• The IEEE 802.19 WG shall have one vote in WG letter ballots
that include CA documents. As part of its ballot comments, the
IEEE 802.19 WG will verify the CA methodology was applied
appropriately and reported correctly.
• The ballot group makes the determination on whether the
coexistence necessary for the standard or amendment has been
met.
• A representative of the IEEE 802.19 WG should vote in all
wireless Sponsor ballots that are in the scope of the IEEE 802.19
coexistence WG.
Submission
Slide 49
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802
November 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.19-14/0080r0
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
IEEE Std 802.11-2012, “Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications,” March 29, 2012
IEEE Std 802.15.2-2003, “Coexistence of Wireless Personal Area Networks with
Other Wireless Devices Operating in Unlicensed Frequency Bands,” August 28,
2003
Nada Golmie, “Coexistence in Wireless Networks: Challenges and System-Level
Solutions in the Unlicensed Bands,” Cambridge University Press, 2006
IEEE Std 802.16h, “Air Interface for Broadband Wireless Access: Amendment 2
Improved Coexistence Mechanisms for Licensed-Exempt Operation,” July 30, 2010
Shahar Hauzner and Mariana Goldhamer, “Coexistence Assurance Document for
802.16h CX-CBP,” IEEE 802.19-09/7r0, March 9, 2009
IEEE Std 802.19.1-2014, “TV White Space Coexistence Methods,” May 16, 2014
Apurva Mody, et. al., “Introduction to IEEE Std. 802.22-2011 and its Amendment
PAR for P802.22b: Broadband Extension and Monitoring,” IEEE 802.22-11/132r3,
November 2011
Submission
Slide 50
Paul Nikolich, IEEE 802