1
Project
Title
IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
< http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/
>
Draft Meeting Minutes, 802.20 Plenary Meeting - Session #17, Vancouver, BC,
Canada, Nov 14-17, 2005
Date
Submitted
2005-11-29
Source(s) Rajat Prakash, as acting Recording
Secretary for the session
QUALCOMM, Incorporated
5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, CA, 92121
Email: rprakash@qualcomm.com
Re: 802.20 Session#17
Abstract Draft of the Minutes of the Session #17;
Purpose
Notice
Release
Patent
Policy
Minutes of the Session.
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE
Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.20.
The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards
Board Operations Manual < http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3
> and in Understanding
Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development < http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html
>.

2
Draft - Meeting Minutes of the 802.20 Session #17
Sep 14-17, 2005
Vancouver, BC, Canada
Rajat Prakash, as acting Recording Secretary
The 17 th
session of 802.20 was held at the Nov 2005 Plenary meeting of IEEE 802 in
Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Contributions and WG documents referenced in these minutes can be found at the
802.20 website, http://www.ieee802.org/20/
See Appendix A for the overall session attendance and participation credit list.
Minutes of 802.20 Monday Nov 14, 2005
Meeting started at 1:30 pm.
Chair went over the presentation C802.20-05/81 (Chair’s opening slides for Plenary).
Copy Right Rules
Logistics of the session.
IEEE 802 meeting conduct
Sign in procedure for the session
IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
Logistics for the session
Meeting agenda
Chair stated the manual sign in books for attendance are based upon an honor system.
Individuals found signing in and leaving or otherwise attempting to falsify their attendance will lose all attendance credit for the session.
Chair reviewed the proposed detail agenda. The Chair stated the times listed were for time allocation planning and the agenda items would be taken in sequence as approved.
Request from James Mollenauer for addition of fifteen minutes time to TSP discussion time. Request noted by Chair and fifteen minutes added to time for discussion in the proposed agenda.
Motion to approve the Agenda (with fifteen minutes added to time for discussion of
TSP). Moved by Jim Tomcik, second by Nancy Bravin. Friendly amendment from Fran
O’Brien and Jose Puthenkulam, a nonmember, to postpone voting to a later meeting.
Amendment not accepted by mover.
Amendment Motion by Hassan Yaghoobi and second by James Mollenauer to take out all technology selection voting from the agenda for this session. Discussion about the motion.
Motion from Dan Gal second by Hank Eilts to have a roll call vote. 18 Yes, 46 No.
Motion passes (need 25% to pass).

3
Motion of Hassan Yaghoobi fails 47 -18 after roll call vote. For results of roll call vote, please refer to Appendix B.
Request for friendly amendment by Dan Gal: After the presentations all over, have on
Wednesday morning, a review of compliance of each of the proposals (1 hour per proposal). The request was declined by the mover (James Tomcik).
Motion by Dan Gal, seconded by Hassan Yaghoobi: Move to add an additional agenda item on Wednesday 8am to 9am for a completeness and compliance review with SRD and Eval. Criteria doc. Motion fails (16 yes, 46 no).
Motion by Anna Tee, second by Hank Eilts: Move to add two hours of Q&A for each proposal if needed. 14 no, 50 No.
Request a Roll Call vote on the Motion of Anna Tee. 10 Yes. 50 no. Motion fails.
Motion to call the question. Moved by Dan Gal, second by Joanne Wilson. Vote on this motion. 49 yes, 9 no. Motion passes and the question is called.
Vote on the Motion to Approve the Agenda. 50 Yes, 10 no. The agenda is approved. See
Appendix C for original approved agenda.
Comment from James Mollenauer about request for determining affiliation of consultants. Chair responded that definition is stated in the attendance book. It is up to each individual, consultants or otherwise, to review and sign in appropriately.
30 minute break.
Review and approval of the minutes. The chair noted that the list of attendees has been reformatted and revised per comments sent in by Hank Eilts.
Motion to approve minutes by Ayman Naguib, second by Nancy Bravin. Chair asked if there were any objections to the approval. Seeing no objections the minutes were approved by unanimous consent.
Chair noted that if someone has comments/objections to PARs for 11y, 16i and 22.1 groups, they should contact the Chair as comments were on Tuesday.
Chair presented updates on the membership policy of 802. Straw poll on which text is preferred
Membership is lost if a person fails to meet the participation requirement of the working group at two out of the last “THREE” or “FOUR” plenary session.
Straw poll in favor of “THREE”: 13, “FOUR”: 67.
Summary Presentation of “Technology Selection Process” by the Chair, as covered in
Chair’s opening slides, C802.20-05/81.
Motion by Hassan Yaghoobi, seconded by Dan Gal to: postpone technology selection voting until the March 2006 Plenary to allow for additional individuals’ proposals to the working group and additional time for study/analysis of existing proposals as per PD07r1 which shows six months between issuance of Call for Proposals and the Final Selection.
The chair stated that this is an agenda change of the approved agenda and therefore requires 2/3 majority.

4
Debate on the motion. Vote on the motion. Yes 16, No 44. Motion fails.
Motion by Dan Gal, second by Hassan Yaghoobi. Amendment to section 3.4.1 of the
Technology Selection Process document. If the number of proposals (either TDD of
FDD) is equal to or less than three, no initial selection or down selection process steps shall take place (skip steps 1 and 2). Rather, a merger between proposals shall be attempted and followed by presentations and a subsequent elimination process (step 3).
The chair stated changing the TSP document requires a 2/3 majority. Yes 17, No 38.
Motion failed.
Motion by Al Wieczorek second by Hassan Yaghoobi : Revise the TSP PD-10 document to add a step [Inserted prior to step 3.4] to perform and complete validation of all submitted Evaluation Calibration Reports prior to any selection voting, said validation consisting of a performance results confirmation report by all other proponents. The chair stated changing the TSP document requires a 2/3 majority. Yes 13, No 45.
Recessed until 8am Tuesday. First item for Tuesday is Rotational OFDM transmission scheme technology proposal.
Minutes of 802.20 Tuesday Nov 15, 2005
The session started at 8am.
Chair passed out the attendance books and stated the manual sign in books for attendance are based upon an honor system. Individuals found signing in and leaving or otherwise attempting to falsify their attendance will lose all attendance credit for the session.
Presentation: C802.20-05/70 by T. Suzuki, H. Ishikawa and Y. Hatakawa. Chair noted that the original submission was only a document, and the proponents requested to present a Power Point document that was not part of the original submission. The group accepted the request with no objection.
Questions and answers followed the presentation.
Presentation: C802.20-05/71-74 by Heesoo Lee, ETRI Technology Proposal.
Presenters: Heesoo Lee, Youg-Jo Ko, Byung Jang Jeong, Jae Kyun Kwon.
Questions and answers followed the presentation.
Break. 11-11:20am
Presentation: C802.20-05/80 Multi-antenna Support for Air Interface Spec. (M.
Youssefmir) . Chair noted that the original submission was only a document, and the proponents requested to present a Power Point document (C802.20-05/85) that was not part of the original submission. The group accepted the request with no objection. The chair noted that the document 85 is available on the website.
Questions and answers followed the presentation.
Lunch break 12:30-1:20pm
Resumed at 1:20pm

5
Chair passed out the attendance books and stated the manual sign in books for attendance are based upon an honor system. Individuals found signing in and leaving or otherwise attempting to falsify their attendance will lose all attendance credit for the session.
Presentation: C802.20-05/58-62 Jim Tomcik. QFDD Technology Presentation.
Presented by Jim Tomcik, Fatih Ulupinar, Alex Gorokhov, Tingfang Ji. It was noted by the chair and Jim Tomcik that Performance Report 2 for the QFDD technology proposal, not required until January, is available on the website.
During the above presentation, some discussion about whether Q&A is allowed during the presentation. Chair ruled that questions are to be asked after the presentation is over.
The same process as used for the other presentations.
Break 3pm-340pm
Motion : Kazuhiro Murakami moved and Ayman Naguib seconded to amend the agenda to allow for the presentation of the BEST WINE technology proposal from 7pm-9:30pm and allow for more time for Q&A time for QTDD on Wednesday morning and finish all technology presentations today. Results: 39 yes 17 no. Motion passes.
Start of QFDD Questions and Answers.
Some attendees requested that their comments be included in the minutes.
Comments by Farooq Khan:
The evaluation methodology required that the FL and RL be modeled jointly and that the latency be 10 ms. The link to system interface calibration data is not included in the proposal package. With one receive antenna, the spectral efficiency is lower than the requirement.
Comments by Anna Tee: The PA information was not turned in as part of report 1.
Presenters stated that their proposal meets all requirements.
Comment by Jim Ragsdale: The report includes only throughput and not spectral efficiency for Vehicular B.
Presenters stated the information was available to calculate the numbers.
The chair noted that we are running late for the day, and will take another hour and a half as part of Q&A.
Motion : By Hassan Yaghoobi second by James Mollenauer to amend the agenda to recess until 8am Wednesday. Motion Fails: Yes 15, No 47.
Motion : By Hassan Yaghoobi second by James Mollenauer to extend Q&A time from 45 to 120 minutes for QFDD Doc C802.20-05/69 (624 pages). Motion fails Yes 15, No 41.
Presentation: C802.20-05/63-69 Jim Tomcik - - QTDD Technology Presentation.
Presented by Jim Tomcik, Fatih Ulupinar, Alex Gorokhov, Tingfang Ji. Chair noted that

6
Q&A on this presentation will be done on Wednesday morning given the agenda amendment to allow for the presentation by the BEST WINE proponents today.
Break from 6:25-7:00pm.
Presentation: C802.20-05/78-79 on BEST-WINE by R. Canchi, K. Murakami, and M.
Kithara.
Questions and answers followed the BEST-WINE presentation.
Statement by Jose Puthenkulam, a nonmember, requested to be included in the minutes:
As per the IEEE 802 Policies & Procedure Section 7.2.4.3, sub section c) which states ‘If a standard cannot be utilized as is and the modifications or extensions to the standard are necessary, the Working Group, with the concurrence of the Executive Committee, develop these changes itself. Even in the latter case, the Working Group should seek the concurrence of the other organization by joint meetings, joint voting rights or other mechanisms on the changes being made.’ As the BEST-WINE proposal is an enhancement of an ATIS standard, before we consider it as a complete proposal, we need to request the ATIS organization if the enhancements proposed in the BEST-WINE proposal cannot be made by ATIS itself then only it can be considered as a proposal.
Hence it should not be treated as a complete proposal in spite of the liaison statement from ATIS which does not state that they cannot make the changes proposed by the presenter.
Response to Jose by Mark Klerer and requested to be included in the minutes: The clause referred to in the P&P refers to an action to be taken by the working group in developing a specification. It does not prevent a member from bringing in a contribution identifying that changes in another SDOs specification are required in order to get WG support for such a change. If the WG agrees to the need for such a change, it is then that the procedure of actions implied by the P&P applies. Indeed prior to having obtained WG consensus on the need for such a change it is impossible for the WG to send a liaison expressing the need for such a change.
9:00pm
Recess until 8:00am
Minutes of 802.20 Wednesday Nov 16, 2005
8:00am session resumed
Chair passed out the attendance books and stated the manual sign in books for attendance are based upon an honor system. Individuals found signing in and leaving or otherwise attempting to falsify their attendance will lose all attendance credit for the session.
Question and answers on QTDD proposal. (8-9:30am time budgeted for this, as noted by the chair after the QTDD presentation on Tuesday.).
There was a question about overhead channel performance, and the presenters noted that they will address this in additional time allotted in the afternoon after the initial selection vote.

7
Motion: Moved by Hassan Yaghoobi, second by James Mollenauer, to extend the Q&A period for QFDD and QTDD for 60 minutes (amended to 120 minutes) starting at 10am on Wednesday to address questions including those in Contribution C802.20-05/91 and
83R1 and 84R1. Friendly amendment to change the timing to 120 minutes. Amendment accepted by the mover. Motion fails Yes 19, No 38.
Mover (Hassan Yaghoobi), asked for a Roll Call vote on the motion. Vote on whether to take a roll call. Yes 13, No 40. Motion fails (need 25% to pass).
Recess for 30 minutes.
Motion: Moved Lin Jiezhen, to eliminate all technology selection voting for the agenda for session 17. Chair noted that this motion is the same as an earlier motion and therefore needs a reconsideration motion. Hasson Yaghoobi requested support for reconsideration of the motion. Chair called for support of the motion from the prevailing side in the earlier vote. No support for reconsideration was seen from the prevailing side in the earlier vote, and the chair ruled that this motion is same as the earlier motion, and hence will not be considered.
Motion : Moved Lin Jiezhen second by Hassan Yaghoobi, the QFDD proposal is incomplete, specifically non-compliant with SRD and not complete per the classification.
The chair pointed out that the motion requires 75% for passing, as per the Technology
Selection Process document.
Motion : Lin Jiezhen second by Hassan Yaghoobi, the QTDD proposal is incomplete, specifically non-compliant with SRD and not complete per the classification.
Motion : Lin Jiezhen second by Hassan Yaghoobi, the BEST-WINE proposal is incomplete, specifically non-compliant with SRD and not complete per the classification.
The motions were withdrawn by the mover and the second before a vote was taken.
Vote on Initial Selection per the TSP document.
Results as shown below, all proposals received more then 35% approval required for further consideration by the working group. Written ballots were distributed to voters and counted by the 2 Vice Chairs. The below are the results of the vote.
802.20 Working Group-Nov. Plenary
Initial Selection Voting- Ballot
Proposal Name
Rotational OFDM Transmission Scheme
ETRI Technology Proposal
Multi-antenna Support for Air Interface
Spec.
Consider
55
56
56
Not
Consider
11
11
11
83%
84%
84%
QFDD Technology
QTDD Technology
56
56
11
11
84%
84%
BEST-WINE Technology Proposal 55 12 82%

8
Recess from 11:30am to 1:00pm per the approved agenda.
1:00pm session resumed
Chair passed out the attendance books and stated the manual sign in books for attendance are based upon an honor system. Individuals found signing in and leaving or otherwise attempting to falsify their attendance will lose all attendance credit for the session.
Comment from a member: The technology selection process required separate voting tracks for FDD and TDD. The ballot taken for initial selection without the two separate tracks. Chair responded that TDD and FDD are separate tracks for the elimination votes.
This ballot did however have separate line items for voting.
Comment from a member: Initial selection voting should give proponents five minutes for final statements. Chair responded that all received at least 82% therefore all are still under future consideration.
Comment from Jim Tomcik: The QFDD and QTDD proposals are attempting to merge with other proposals and therefore he is making a motion to allow for merger time.
Motion: Jim Tomick moves and R. Canchi seconded, to amend the agenda to defer further technology selection elimination/confirmation voting from session 17 so that potential mergers can be developed and presented in session 18 noting that merged documents are due seven days in advance of the session presented.
Results: Yes 55, No 0. Motion passes.
The Chair stated the agenda now has New Business as the next item. Therefore the Chair asked if there was any new business.
Motion : Dan Gal moves and second by Jim Mollenauer, given the expressed intent by companies to submit technology proposals at the Jan 2006 session, move to allow for additional proposal submissions for session 18 with the same call for proposal rules as for session 17.
Debate on the motion:
Current submitters of technology proposals spoke strongly against the motion. Their rational was that others proponents would have an unfair advantage having now seen their proposals. Also they had worked very hard to make the agreed deadline. Allowing proposal from all including those who have not participated in the group to submit proposals in later sessions was unfair.
Riku Pirhonen requested his statement be included in the minutes. Referring to comments from Jim Tomick and R. Canchi, Riku Pirhonen questioned the time schedule because as noted by JimTomcik had people working 24 hours a day on the proposals and out of the
45-50 companies who have affiliates in the group, only three contributed full proposals.
A new schedule for work in this group was announced in the previous interim session and after that the group has attracted lot of new interest from experienced individuals who have not participated in the working group before. He asked the Chair how these people could now contribute.
A member commented that the schedule had not changed and all technology proposals were always due at the same time just like in other working groups.

9
The Chair responded no selection had been made and if a proposal was not acceptable then it should not receive 75% and people can also address inputs in the ballot process.
Request from Jim Molleneuer for friendly amendment to change text from “session 18” to “sessions 18 and 19”. Amendment accepted by the mover. After further debate, the mover withdrew acceptance of amendment.
Results: Yes 18, No 49. Motion fails.
Motion: Moved by Anna Tee, second by Hassan Yaghoobi, to amend the agenda to include the presentations and discussions of all contributions including late contributions and questions for the technology presenters that were submitted to the IEEE 802.20 working group for session 17. The motion is put forward specifically because of the fact that an earlier motion that may cause the session to adjourn early than expected. The group can use this time for further discussions. Yes 16, No 42. Motion fails.
Under Next Meeting Planning:
Chair reminded the group about early registration for Hawaii and the need to book hotel rooms now. The Chair asked if there were any other Next Meeting Planning items to cover. No other items were raised.
Motion to Adjourn
Moved by Farrokh Khatibi
Second by Ayman Naguib
Results: Yes 45, No 10. Motion passes.
Chair reminded all that had not signed the attendance books for the PM1 time slot to come to the front and sign in. The Chair collected the attendance books and created a queue for all who needed to sign in. The Chair stated that 75% participation in the utilized time slots is required for overall session credit.
Time: 2:41 pm
Session #17 is adjourned
Appendix A
Attendance and Participation Credit
Based upon 9 available time slots and 75% is 7 time slots, plus possible 1 extra credit for a
Tutorial. IEEE staff and the 802 Chair have concurred with the Chair’s ruling .
Last Name First Name Company/Organization
Reg.
November 05 #17
Abdelilah
Agis
Agrawal
Ahmadi
Ahn
Alamouti
Ali
Alphonse
Youssef
Edward
Avneesh
Sassan
Jae Young
Siavash
Murtaza
Jean
Individual
Intel Corp
Qualcomm
Intel
ETRI
Intel
Texas Instruments
Lucent Technologies
ID
1570
410
2982
3149
2783
564
1199
3123
Participation Credit
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

10
Arefi
Austin
Barriac
Baum
Bentov
Bernstein
Bravin
Bussey
Cai
Canchi
Carlo
Carson
Castell
Chayat
Chen
Chickneas
Chion
Cho
Choi
Choi
Chong
Chun
Cleveland
Cook
Crowley
Dalal
Davis
Dean
Dixon
Dodd
Dong
Dorward
Dunn
Eilts
Epstein
Feder
Ferguson
Fong
Freeland
Gal
Garcia-Alis
Garg
Giles
Gong
Gorodetsky
Reza
Mark
Gwen
Kevin
Izhar
Jeffrey
Intel
OFCOM
Qualcomm
Motorola
Adavcom
TMG
Nancy
Chris
Sean
Individual
Bussey Consulting
ZTE Communications
Radhakrishna Kyocera
Jim Huawei
Peter
Harold P.
Qualcomm
Bussey Consulting
Naftali
Michael
Jim
Alvarion
3dsp corporation
Consultant/Lucent
Hua
Jaeweon
ZTE Communications
Samsung Electronics
JoonYoung Samsung
Yang-Seok Intel
Chia-Chin DoCoMo USA Labs
Jin Young
Joseph
LGE
Samsung
Charles
Steven
Neerav
Chantal
Qwest
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
Award Solutions
Industry Canada
Chris
Allen
Donald
Xiao Lu
Lynne
Doug
Henry
Mark
TMG Telecom
Corning Cable Sys
Case Communications
CATR
Ladcomm Corp
KTRC
Texas Instruments
Qualcomm
Peretz
Alistair
Mo-Han
Graham
Dan
Daniel
Lucent
Selbourne Associates
Nortel
Steepest Ascent Ltd
Lucent
Univ. of Strathclyde
Deepshikha KTRC
Arthur A Giles Consulting
Daning
Svetlana
CATR
Gorodetsky Consulting
2788
1180
3251
2068
3109
2339
210
1346
2093
1236
2957
642
1192
1190
337
1391
1355
3050
2476
999
2083
1418
2342
891
1085
1327
262
447
678
745
757
979
335
184
998
969
3184
562
618
1979
1820
2961
1410
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes

11
Gorokhov
Guo
Harrington
Hatakawa
Ho
Hou
Howard
Humbert
Huo
Ibbetson
Iimuro
Ishikawa
Jain
Jeong
Jeong
Jette
Ji
Johnson
Jones
Joo
Jung
Kadous
Kalhan
Kasch
Khademi
Khan
Khandekar
Khatibi
Kiernan
Kim
Kim
Kim
Kim
Kimura
Kitahara
Kitamura
Klerer
Knisely
Ko
Koo
Koo
Kunz
Alexei
Qiang
Bryan
Qualcomm Inc.
Motorola
3064
871
Deutsch Adv. Interconnect
3028
Yasuyuki
Jin-Meng
Victor
KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc.
3148
Intel
519
Broadcom
2075
Fred
John
David
Network Consulting Services
Sprint
Lucent
Luke Vodafone
Kazuyoshi Kyocera
2891
834
1853
1329
3183
Hiroyasu
Raj
KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc.
3133
Washington Univ. StL
3199
Byung-Jang ETRI
Moo Ryong DoCoMo USA Labs.
3225
769
Alan
Tingfang
Brian
Dennis
Motorola
Qualcomm Inc.
Texas Instruments
Taliesen North Consulting
Pan Yuh Samsung
Woo Young DGIST
2981
3113
1476
1252
1242
3096
Tamer Qualcomm
2977
Amit
William
Majid
Farooq
Aamod
Farrokh
Brian
Beomjoon
Byoung-Jo
Yong Ho
Young-Ho
Shigeru
Minako
Takuya
Mark
Douglas
Young-Jo
Changhoi
Jayong
William
Kyocera Telecom Research
3049
John Hopkins Univ.
2570
Khademi Consulting
Samsung
Qualcomm Inc
506
2793
2976
Qualcomm
1274
Interdigital Communications
577
LG Electronics
ATT Research
1114
634
LG Electronics
Samsung
Kyocera
Kyocera
Fujitsu
Flarion Technologies
Airvana
ETRI
Samsung
Intel
Individual
2462
1425
791
602
1533
2943
3200
2379
2997
3202
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No

12
Kwon
Kwon
Kwon
Laihonen
Lalaguna
Lawrence
Lee
Lee
Lee
Lee
Li
Li
Li
Lim
Lin
Liva
Lo
Lozano
Lu
Ma
Martynov
Martynov
McMahon
McMillan
Merrill
Miyazono
Moayeri
Modlin
Mollenauer
Murakami
Murphy
Naaman
Nabar
Nagai
Naguib
Naidu
Nakamura
Nakamura
Nakano
Nguyen
Nicolas
Novick
O'Brien
Odlyzko
Oguma
Young Hyoun LG Electronics
Dong Seung ETRI
Jae Kyun
Kari
Pablo
Lisa
ETRI
TeliaSonera
MedStar
CTCI Group
Heesoo
John
Mihyun
ETRI
Huawei
Samsung Electronics
Wook-Bong LG Electronics
3087
1523
3122
1440
1194
2797
2119
3092
Jaing
Jun
Huawei
Nortel Natworks
Thomas FutureWei Technologies
Hyoung-kyn Samsung
Jiezhen Siemens Ltd., China
Valentino
Titus
Angel
Jianmin
Steven
Irina
Michael
Anthony
Euramnet
Walbell Technologies
Lucent Technologies
Huawei
Freescale Semi.
Belgud International
Belgud International
Steepest Ascent
Adv. Network Tech.
Solutions Donald
Mark
Max
Nader
Cory
James
Kazuhiro
Peter
Laith
Romit
Yukimasa
Ayman
Mullaguru
Kenichi
Tetsuya
Shinji
Nha
Julien
Fred
Francis
Paul
Hiroshi
Netgear
Qualcomm
NIST
Texas Instruments
Technical Strategy/Motorola
205
Kyocera
798
Intel Corp.
Intel Corp
2621
3212
Marvell Semiconductor
Mitsubishi Electric
Qualcomm
Qualcomm
Fujitsu
NTT MCL Inc.
KTRC.
BCSI
Kyocera Research
Bussey Consulting
Lucent
Motorola
Institute MIyagi Pref
1834
2524
2166
1234
1764
None
670
3135
3001
2086
1408
1409
3101
1010
2097
3063
2483
1196
681
93
1323
2245
1398
1921
1157
433
43
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

13
Oyman
Park
Park
Patzer
Peng
Perini
Ozgur
DS
Intel
Samsung
Won-Hyoung Samsung AIT
Steve Intel
He
Patrick
CATR
EFR, Inc.
Pfann
Pirhonen
Pittampalli
Eugen
Riku
Eshwar
Poisson
Polsgrove
Prakash
Preece
Sebastien
Jim
Rajat
Rob
Puthenkulam Jose
Univ. of Strathclyde
Nokia
Lucent
OasisWireless
JKB Global
Qualcomm
BCSI
Intel
Qian
Qu
Ragsdale
Rajkumar
Razoumov
Roy
Ruck
Salminen
Sampath
Sano
Shields
Xiaoshu
Hongyun
James
Ajay
Leonid
Richard
Herbert
Reijo
Hemanth
Masato
Judy
Intel
ZTE Communications
Ericsson
Lucent
Intel
SRA, Inc.
Navini Networks
Seesta
Qualcomm
KTRC
Ladcomm Corp.
Shigiang
Shively
Sivanesan
Son
Son
Springer
Staver
Suh
Sutivong
Suzuki
Tang
Teague
Tee
Tomcik
Tomici
Trick
Ulupinar
Upton
Valbonesi
Valls
Deng
David
Kathiravetpillai
Jungje Samsung Electronics
Yeongmoon Samsung
Warren
Doug
Springer Assoc./Independent
3581969Canada Inc.
21
1233
405
358
Changho
Arak
Tomohiro
Xiangguo
Harris
Lai-King
Anna
James
John
Huawei
Cingular Wireless
Samsung
Samsung Electronics
TRUE Corporation
KYOCERA Corp.
FutureWei Technologies
Qualcomm, Inc.
Samsung
Qualcomm
3022
626
1183
3147
579
3182
2167
2978
857
Interdigital Communications
2967
John
Fatih
Jerry
Lucia
Bussey Consulting
Qualcomm
Juan Carlos TMG Group
695
2934
JUptonConsulting;Qualcomm
300
Motorola
2007
1432
2802
227
1452
1520
320
3090
1986
2437
1373
3171
122
3240
3081
249
498
440
2191
953
781
1890
2633
2244
1384
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

14
Venkatachalam Muthaiah
Vijayan Rajiv
Vivanco
Vos
Silvia
Gustav
Watanabe
Wieczorek
Wilson
Wu
Fujio
Alfred
Joanne
Gang
Wu
Wu
Xiang
Geng
Shiguan
David
Intel Corp
Qualcomm, Inc.
TMG
Sierra Wireless
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
Motorola
ArrayComm
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
Nortel
Nortel
Future Wei Tech.
Yaghoobi Hassan
Yallapragada Rao
Yang Juin
Yang Yunsong
Intel
Qualcomm
Accton
Futurewei Tech.
411
3162
3238
2017
Yeh
Yin
Yoon
Youssefmir
Yuda
Choongil
Hujun
Young C.
Michael
Tetsuya
ETRI
Intel
LGE
ArrayComm
KTRC
302
3014
1582
758
Yuza Masaaki NEC infrontia
24
Zhu Peiying Nortel
397
Appendix B
Roll Call Vote on:
Motion: Hassan Yaghoobi, second by James Mollenauer. Remove all technology selection voting from the agenda of session 17.
1181
2979
1029
3167
265
1331
1754
1004
230
3060
370
Last Name
Alder
Bajaj
Barriac
Bernstein
Bravin
Bussey
Canchi
Carneiro
Carson
Castell
Chickneas
Cho
Dean
First Name
Larry
Rashmi
Gwen
Jeffrey
Nancy
Chris
Radhakrishna
Edson
Peter
Harold P.
Jim
Juphil
Chris x x x x x x x x
YES NO ABSTAIN x x x x x
ABSENT
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No

David S.
Lin
Dennis
Majid
Farooq
Farrokh
Shigeru
Minako
Mark
Douglas
Skip
Pablo
Lisa
Heesoo
Irina
Donald
Lynne
Henry
Mark
Alistair
Dan
Daniel
Deepshikha
Arthur
Eladio
Svetlana
Qiang
Victor
David
Michael
Donald
Max
James
Kazuhiro
Ayman
Mullaguru
Nguyen
Fred
Francis
Luo
Riku
Eshwar
Sebastien
Amy
Jim
Rajat
James
Jiezhen
Jones
Khademi
Khan
Khatibi
Kimura
Kitahara
Klerer
Knisely
Knowles
Lalaguna
Lawrence
Lee
Martynov
15
Dodd
Dorward
Eilts
Epstein
Ferguson
Gal
Garcia-Alis
Garg
Giles
Gomes
Gorodetsky
Guo
Hou
Huo
Martynov
McMillan
Miyazono
Mollenauer
Murakami
Naguib
Naidu
Nha
Novick
O'Brien
Ping
Pirhonen
Pittampalli
Poisson
Polcari
Polsgrove
Prakash x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

16
Preece
Pulcini
Ragsdale
Rajkumar
Shields
Shively
Springer
Staver
Stone
Sutivong
Tee
Tomcik
Toro
Trick
Tsui
Upton
Valls
Vivanco
Wasilewski
Wieczorek
Wilson
Wu
Yaghoobi
Yallapragada
Youssefmir
Yuda
Yuza
Rob
Gregory
James
Ajay
Judy
David
Warren
Doug
Mike
Arak
Lai-King Anna
James
Steven
John
Daniel
Jerry
Juan Carlos
Silvia
Thomas
Alfred
Joanne
Gang
Hassan
Rao
Michael
Tetsuya
Masaaki
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

17
Appendix C – Approved Agenda for the start of Session 17
Proposed Detail Agenda – November 2005 Plenary, Session #17
Hyatt Regency, Vancouver, Canada AS APPROVED ON MONDAY
Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 11:00AM
– 12:30PM
IEEE 802 Opening Plenary
Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 12:30PM - 1:30PM
Lunch, no Joint Wireless Opening
Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 1:30PM – 5:30PM
Hyatt ( Break 3:30 – 4:00PM )
- Opening Session of 802.20
- - IEEE IPR rules and meeting conduct
- Logistics for the session
- - Review of Proposed 802.20 Agenda
- - Approval of Agenda including modifications
- - Review and approve Sept. Minutes
- - Review Other WGs Activities
- - Update on 802.18 Activities
-
- Review of Technology Selection Process
-
- Start Proposal Presentations
- -Rotational OFDM Transmission Scheme (Hiroyasu Ishikawa)
1:30-2:30pm
2:30-3:45pm
4:00-5:30pm
Monday, Nov. 14, 2005 7:30PM - 9:00PM 802 Tutorials
Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2005 8:00AM - 12:30PM Hyatt ( Break 10:00
– 10:30AM
)
C802.20-05/81
C802.20-05/70
Proposal Presentations:
- ETRI Technology Presentation (Heesoo Lee) 8:00-10:30am
- Multi-antenna Support for Air Interface Spec. (M. Youssefmir) 11:00-12:30pm
C802.20-05/71-74
C802.20-05/80
Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2005 1:00PM
– 6:30PM
Hyatt ( Break 3:30 – 4:00PM )
Proposal Presentations:
- QFDD Technology Presentation (Jim Tomcik)
- QTDD Technology Presentation (Jim Tomcik)
- BEST-WINE Technology Presentation (R. Canchi)
1:00-2:30pm
2:30-4:00pm
4:30-6:00pm
C802.20-05/58-62
C802.20-05/63-67
C802.20-05/68-69
C802.20-0575/79
Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2005 7:30PM - 9:00PM 802 Tutorials

18
Appendix C continued
Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2005 8:00AM - 12:00PM Hyatt ( Break 10:00 – 10:30AM )
Initial Technology Selection Voting
( 5 minutes per proposal and Initial Voting)
Recess until 1:00pm
8:00-10:00am
Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2005 1:00PM - 6:30PM Hyatt ( Break 3:30 – 4:00PM ) 802 Social in the evening
Additional Proposal Presentations before 1 st
Elimination Vote
(45 minutes per Proposal remaining after Initial Selection)
First Elimination/Confirmation Vote for TDD and FDD
1:00-3:30pm
4:00-6:00pm
Thursday, Nov. 17, 2005 8:00AM - 12:00PM Hyatt ( Break 10:00 – 10:30AM )
Technology Selection Process Elimination Voting or
Confirmation Voting 8:00am-12:00pm
Thursday, Nov. 17, 2005 1:00PM - 6:00PM Hyatt ( Break 3:30 – 4:00PM )
Technology Selection Process-Voting continued if necessary 1:00pm- 4:30pm and Next steps
New Business
Next Meeting Planning
Close and Adjourn
4:30pm- 5:00pm
5:00pm- 5:30pm
5:30pm -6:00pm