1
Project
IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
<http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/>
Title
Draft Meeting Minutes, 802.20 Interim Meeting - Session #20, Jacksonville, LA, USA, May
15-16, 2006
Date
Submitted
2006-06-07
Source(s)
Rajat Prakash,
Recording Secretary for the session
QUALCOMM, Incorporated
5775 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, CA, 92121
Re:
802.20 Session#20
Abstract
Draft of the Minutes of the Session #20;
Purpose
Minutes of the Session.
Email: rprakash@qualcomm.com
Release
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for
discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this
document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right
to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this
contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in
the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution;
and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE
Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made
public by IEEE 802.20.
Patent
Policy
The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards
Board Operations Manual <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3> and in Understanding
Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html>.
Notice
2
Draft - Meeting Minutes of the 802.20 Session #19
May 15-16, 2006
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Rajat Prakash, Recording Secretary
The 20th session of 802.20 was held at the May 2006 Interim meeting in Jacksonville, Fla.
Contributions and WG documents referenced in these minutes can be found at the
802.20 website, http://www.ieee802.org/20/
See the Appendix C for the overall session attendance and participation credit list.
Minutes of 802.20 Monday May 15, 2006
Meeting started at 11 am.
Chair went over the presentation C802.20-06/27 (Chair’s opening slides ).








Bylaws on Patents
Copy Right Rules
Logistics of the session.
IEEE 802 meeting conduct
Sign in procedure for the session (the Chair mentioned that members credit for tutorials is
based on the honor system, and members should claim credit for a tutorial if they get)
Procedure for sign in for 802.19/802.18.
IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
Affiliation Statements
1110am: Discussion of agenda. (included in Appendix B).
Quorum Call: Hand count of voters showed 34.
A Roll Call for Quorum was requested by Jose Puthenkulam: 44 voters present out of 143 as
shown in Appendix A.
The Chair stated no Quorum was present.
11:30am: Chair projected the agenda (as posted on the website).
Anna Tee requested that posted contributions (19, 20 and 21) be presented. R. Canchi agreed to
present (10 minutes) his contribution 21. Jim Tomcik replied that the contribution is clear and
does not need presentation. He suggested discussion be carried out through private email or email
on the reflector. After further discussion with Anna Tee, Jim Tomcik agreed to discuss 19 and 20
on Tuesday morning. Chair to amend agenda to add 19, 20 and 21 to the morning schedule for
Tuesday.
Jose Puthenkulam asked if “current status of letter ballot” item included discussion of the
resolutions for LB1. Chair responded that LB1 comments and resolutions are posted on the
website. Chair stated LB2 a recirculation was already in ballot. Jose requested that resolution
items should be discussed in this meeting, and stated that “the process is not open, and the
comments are not being discussed in the WG. The WG is supposed to determine the standard, and
not the five members of the BRC”.
Hand count (members only) for approving the agenda: 10 in favor, 2 opposed, 23 abstain.
Approved Agenda in Appendix B
3
Regarding Anna Tee’s contribution about the March meeting, chair noted that we will be unable
to approve the minutes in this meeting (lack of quorum) and in this meeting we should discuss
this and, if needed come up with modified text. Chair suggested he work with Anna Tee during
the lunch break.
Jiezhen Lin said she had some comments about the minutes too, and Chair suggested offline
discussion. Jim Ragsdale and Jose Puthenkulam also requested time for review of the minutes.
After further discussion, chair projected the March minutes (redlined version submitted by Anna
Tee). Suggestions for some changes to the text from Jose Puthenkulam and Jim Ragsdale. The
chair discussed individual redlined items.
Break for lunch 1230pm.
Resume at 140pm.
Resume with discussion of ballot resolution process.
Presenter of contribution 18 requested delay in presenting the contribution. All Agreed.
Chair started letter ballot status update. Chair requested the members to look at the material on
the web page and noted that there has been a change in the approval percentages due to abstain
votes being counted the wrong way earlier. Jim Ragsdale requested for an extension of the ballot
resolution period, and the chair responded that given this a recirculation, the given deadline is
acceptable.
Jose Puthenkulam raised the issue of copyright and the chair replied that correspondence is
ongoing between the chair and other organizations to address copyright questions raised. Jose
requested to see the letters that have been exchanged between the chair and other organizations.
Chair replied he would decide later if the individual emails would be shared. Chair also noted that
given there were comments on the ballot regarding copyright questions he felt he should work to
resolve the comments.
2pm: Contribution “Systematic problems with current draft” 06-22r1, Alan Jette and James F.
Mollenauer.
The chair asked the presenters to present a redlined version of the changes in r1 and the
presenters gave a redlined version. Disagreement and debate between Doug Knislely who chaired
the development of a document refernced and the presenters about this contribution.
Hassan Yaghoobi questioned the completeness of the proposals given that there is some common
text between the proposals and existing standards (of other organizations). The chair disagreed
with the statement. Hassan Yaghoobi requested for the procedural vice chair’s opinion on this
issue. The editor replied that according to IEEE style manual rules (sec 2.5), the permission may
be requested as soon as the text is included in the draft, and that there is no requirement that the
proposal submitter obtain copyright permission prior to submission.
Jose Puthenkulam (supported by Al Jette) stated that resolving the copyright issue is important,
and requested the chair disclose the correspondence with other standards bodies. The chair
responded that he sent an email to TIA requesting a copyright permission review for possible
common text. Again, Jose requested a copy emails by the Chair. The chair stated he would share
official letters as part of the comment resolution.
Anna Tee then read a reference to an IEEE procedures document.
Jim Mollenauer proposed a motion to modify the draft text (since quorum is not present in this
meeting, Jim requested that the motion be voted in the July plenary). The chair responded that the
ballot is open and this motion is out of order. Jim Ragsdale asked about the correctness of this
action given lack of quorum, the chair replied that this is a straw poll and not a motion (because
quorum is not met). Al Wieczorek. commented that motions should be allowed without quorum,
4
and future meetings should be able to able to approve/disapprove the motion. Jim responded that
he is okay with this item being a straw poll.
Text of straw poll:
The editor be directed to modify the current text as follows
 Restrict the scope of the draft to the MAC and Physical layers
 Remove text copied from other standards group
 Replace this text with reference to 3gpp2 document(s) such as C.S0024.A
 Add messages to 3gpp2 MAC layer if needed by the new physical layer [removed by
movers]
 Explicitly indicate what parts of 3gpp2 standard are not used [removed in response to
Doug’s comment]
Debate on the straw poll. After comment from Doug Knisely, the last item was removed.
After a comment from Jose Puthenkulam, Jim Mollenauer then requested to change this straw
poll to a motion. The chair ruled that this is not a valid motion because it is not enforceable even
if it got passed with quorum. The chair said that the draft will only change through the ballot
process.
Jim Ragsdale that there are only two alternatives: straw poll now, or carry motion forward to next
meeting. The chair ruled that the rules allow for the third alternative for a motion to take place
during a non-quorum meeting and be revoted in a plenary. However the chair stated that the
motion is non-actionable.
Jim Mollenauer said he would like to make this a motion. Seconded by Anna Tee
Final form of motion below.
That the 802.20 working group modify the existing text as follows
 Restrict the scope of the draft to the MAC and Physical layers
 Remove text copied from other standards group
 Replace this text with reference to 3GPP2 document(s) such as C.S0024.A
Vote on the motion 28-8-3. Motion passes (this is a technical vote).
Chair stated he would rule on the validity on the motion in July Plenary.
Break for coffee at 4pm. Resume at 430pm
Contribution: “Proposed traffic modeling ad hoc”. Leonid Razoumov and Hujun Yin,
contribution 18. The contributor requested the chair to grant an ad hoc study group to come up
with a more realistic traffic model (particularly on the reverse link).
The chair asked the contributor how this is useful given technology selection is completed in the
WG. Hassan Yaghoobi suggested that if the ad hoc comes up with recommendations, those could
be used to modify the draft in the ballot process. Hassan Yaghoobi also expressed his concern
about the way his LB comment (regarding this traffic model issue) was resolved.
Some discussion on the contribution. Jose Puthenkulam and Anna Tee argued in favor of the
contributor.
R. Canchi noted that the parameters (traffic mix) themselves are not part of the draft
specification, but were used as part of technology selection. Mark Klerer and Jim Tomcik noted
that such an ad hoc committee should be formed outside 802.20 to develop real world traffic
models for performance evaluation purposes. Jose argued that an outside group may not have the
motivation to improve the draft of 802.20 and therefore this work should be done within 802.20.
5
Anna Tee commented on the process by which the evaluation criteria document was formed and
said the evaluation criteria document is incomplete. She also referred to the 3GPP2 evaluation
methodology and commented that it included a better model for the reverse link.
The chair responded that after weighing all arguments, he would not form an ad hoc.
Jose requested the chair to take a motion to support the formation of an ad hoc. Chair noted that
the process requires a motion to reopen the evaluation criteria document (technical vote). Jose
argued that the ECD need not be opened at this stage, and the ad hoc should be formed and
allowed to complete its work. If the ad hoc decides to change the ECD, it may be through a later
motion to open the ECD. The chair replied that for this ad hoc to serve its purpose, the ECD has
to be opened, and thus he will take a vote on opening the ECD first.
520pm Motion moved by Jose Puthenkulam and second by Hujun Yin (note, motion was
modified through a friendly amendment by Anna Tee). “Motion to initiate adhoc group to
develop the traffic models for the reverse link, that are not in the evaluation criteria document
based on the deficiencies identified by contribution C802.20-06-18.
Chair ruled that this is a technical vote (reopen the ECD) and needs 75% to pass.
Debate on the motion.
Motion 28 yes, 5 no, 3 abstain. Note that it needs another vote in a meeting with Quorum.
Recess for the day. Will Resume at 8am with contribution 23.
Minutes of 802.20 Tuesday May 16, 2006
Meeting started at 805am.
Presentation “Suggestion for LB Resolution Results” 06/23 Jiezhen Lin and T. Hu.
Anna Tee stated that the WB mode and 625k-MC mode have a different MAC and different
PHY, and that this difference is unusual. Anna Tee requested to know the commonalities between
the two modes. The editor mentioned some example from 802 that have multiple PHYs and also
some examples that have multiple MAC/PHYs.
Presentation 830am: “Suggestions on Improvements for LB1 Comment Resolution Results”
06/24 Anna Tee, C. Koo & DS Park.
Some discussion about the points raised in the above contribution, including discussion on PAPR.
Jim Tomcik mentioned that the PAPR issue can be solved by scheduler design and power control
design (and that these two algorithms are outside the scope of the spec). Anna Tee referred to her
earlier contribution (Mar 2005) for details on the PAPR problem. The chair stated that Anna Tee
may mail the contribution (and supporting studies if available) to the reflector, in order to
convince the WG about this problem. Anna Tee requested Jim Tomcik to provide data in support
of his claim that the scheduler can reduce PAPR.
Mark Klered stated that the letter ballot process requires members to send suggestions along with
ballot comments, so that the ballot resolution committee should decide how to act on the
comments.
Al Jette requested the following be in the minutes “This contribution and several of the other
contribution this week are based on the chair’s actions of forming a closed letter ballot resolution
6
committee and sending to recirculation ballot without having any discussion in the 802.20 WG on
the resolution comments. The chair’s steps prevent a fair and open process. These actions prevent
a minority of the membership of the group from having the ability to influence development of
this standard”. Jose Puthenkulam made a statement supporting the above argument and made a
reference to the 802 P&P.
Motion (Anna Tee, second by Jiezhen Lin) Move the WG to improve comment resolution to
comment #22, by starting an ad hoc group to investigate the alternative uplink waveform for
802.20, which has a lower peak to average power ratio, e.g. DFT spread OFDM or other
alternatives.
The chair questioned if this is a study group that may result in a new PAR. Anna Tee replied that
the output of the ad hoc will be a comparison of waveforms that will be used by the WG during
ballot resolution. Jim Mollenauer argued in favor of the ad hoc group.
Motion passes 28 yes -6 no -2 abstain. Joanne Wilson asked if this is a technical or procedural
vote.
The chair said he will rule on this motion in July.
Contribution:930am, 06/26 “Suggestion on a remedy for the missing transmitter and receiver
requirements specification in 802.20 standard draft V 1.0” Anna Tee, Changhoi Koo et al.
Jim Ragsdale stated that compliance with the SRD requires the addition of transmitter and
receiver requirements to the draft specification.
Motion (Anna Tee, second Hassan Yaghoobi) Move to create a ad hoc group to work on the
transmitter and receiver specifications for the 802.20 standard draft to ensure the completeness of
the standard draft and compliance with the 802.20 systems requirements document.
Joanne Wilson suggested changing to ad hoc group in above motion (original motion said task
group).
Vote was 29-4-2.
The chair said he will rule on this motion in July. .
Break 10am-1030am. Resume with contribution 25.
Resumed at 1035am.
Contribution 25r1 “IEEE 802.20 comment resolution process for letter ballot I”. Anna Tee, Bill
Semper et al.
Debate on the ballot resolution process and the role and membership of the BRC. Jose
Puthenkulam questioned the process. Anna Tee stated that the chair has planned a schedule that
does not give an opportunity to discuss ballot comments in the WG.
Motion: 1110am (Anna Tee , second by Jose Puthenkulam): To carry out 802.20 WG LB
comment resolutions during the working group meeting, as implied in section 7.2.4.21.2 of the
802 P&P.
Rationale: Section 7.2.4.2.2 of the 802 P&P states “normally, the working group meets to resolve
the negatives or assigns the task to a ballot resolution group”. The normal method is not being
followed, and no valid reason has been given. In addition to the BRG members have not been
authorized by the WG by a vote. Also, the mover and seconder and possibly several others have
been denied participation in the BRC.
7
Chair ruled that the motion is out of order because the ballot resolution/recirculation procedure
was set at March Plenary.
Anna Tee stated that “802.20-06/03 applies to LB1, but the motion applies to all current and
future comment resolution procedures.” She also stated the rules for ballot resolution should be
revised.
Anna Tee stated that she would like to have a straw poll similar to the previous motion. The chair
ruled that he will not take the straw poll because he has already ruled the motion out of order.
Contribution: 1130am 06/19. “Response to C802.20-06-14r1”, Jim Tomcik.
Jim Tomcik stated that this contribution is purely informational, and he does not expect the WG
to take any action in response to the contribution. Jim also stated that further information may be
obtained through email (privately or on the reflector).
Contribution: 1145am 06/21. “Queries listed in C802.20-06-14r1 on MBTDD and 625k0MC
mode” R. Canchi.
Contribution was presented.
Contribution: 1155am 06/20. “F-SSCH Performance”, Jim Tomcik.
Jim also stated that further information may be obtained through email (privately or on the
reflector).
Recess for lunch, resume at 105pm.
Resumed at 115pm:
Discussion of March minutes. The recording secretary projected the revised minutes on the
screen and the minutes were reviewed with input from Anna Tee, Jose Puthenkulam and Jim
Ragsdale. All proposed changes were agreed. The Chair stated the revised version would be
posted and
Next meeting planning: Jose Puthenkulam asked the chair to meet for four days in July. The
chair noted that input.. He stated he did not believe a four day meeting was necessary.
Jose requested a straw poll to see the opinion of the WG about the duration of the next meeting.
The chair stated he will do a poll on the reflector to ask a larger set of people what they are
planning for contributions. Then the chair will finalize an agenda.
Relative to appeals the chair stated there was an Appeal Hearing Wed afternoon on the Appeal
from Jose Puthenkulam and Hassan Yaghoobi.
There was also an Executive Committee Rehearing request of an appeal ruling.
Chair agreed to put on the reflector the schedule of these hearings when he has a final schedule.
Anna Tee proposed to make a motion, and the chair asked if the motion is related to the current
agenda item.
Jose Puthenkulam stated that a motion can be made at any time.
Text of motion: “Move to cancel the letter ballot”. Anna Tee and second by Al Jette.
Rationale: the letter ballot was initiated in violation of the 802.20 P&P procedures rules in 2.9.2.
In addition there are several technical issues that are not addressed in the draft in order to meet
the system requirements as highlighted in C802.20-06026 and C802.20-06/15r2; and the ballot
comment resolution process is not an open process, as discussed in C802.20-06-25r1.
8
The chair ruled the motion out of order because (1) ballot resolution is ongoing, and (2) this item
is already in appeal, and (3) the motion is not related to the agenda item.
The chair noted that the July meeting will likely start on Monday 1pm or later.
Motion to adjourn: Hank Eilts, second by Jim Tomcik. No objections.
Meeting Adjourned at 2:30pm
Appendix A:
Reg. ID
May
Voter
Present
Intel Corp
410
M
Y
Jae Young
ETRI
2783
M
Y
Alamouti
Siavash
Intel
564
M
Y
Arefi
Reza
Intel
2083
M
Y
Canchi
Radhakrishna
Kyocera
745
M
Y
Choi
Yang-Seok
Intel
642
M
Y
Eilts
Henry
Texas Instruments
2476
M
Y
Epstein
Mark
Qualcomm
999
M
Y
Guo
Qiang
Motorola
871
M
Y
Hou
Victor
Broadcom
2075
M
Y
Jette
Alan
Motorola
2981
M
Y
Kiernan
Brian
Interdigital Com.
577
M
Y
Kitamura
Takuya
Fujitsu
M
Y
Klerer
Mark
Qualcomm
1533
M
Y
Koo
Changhoi
Samsung
2379
M
Y
Kwon
Dong Seung
ETRI
1523
M
Y
Lee
Heesoo
ETRI
2797
M
Y
Lee
Wook-Bong
LG Electronics
3092
M
Y
Li
Jun
Nortel Natworks
2524
M
Y
Lim
Hyoung Kyu
Samsung
1234
M
Y
Lin
Jiezhen
Siemens Ltd., China
1764
M
Y
Ma
Steven
Freescale Semi.
2086
M
Y
Mollenauer
James
Technical Strategy/Motorola
205
M
Y
Nakamura
Tetsuya
NTT MCL Inc.
M
Y
Odlyzko
Paul
Motorola
M
Y
Last Name
First Name
Company/Organization
Agis
Edward
Ahn
433
9
Park
Won-Hyoung
Samsung AIT
3171
M
Y
Perini
Patrick
EFR, Inc.
3240
M
Y
Pirhonen
Riku
Nokia
249
M
Y
Prakash
Rajat
Qualcomm
1520
M
Y
Puthenkulam
Jose
Intel
M
Y
Qian
Xiaoshu
Intel
3090
M
Y
Ragsdale
James
Ericsson
498
M
Y
Son
Yeongmoon
Samsung
1233
M
Y
Suh
Changho
Samsung Electronics
3147
M
Y
Tee
Lai-King Anna
Samsung
M
Y
Tomcik
James
Qualcomm
857
M
Y
Upton
Jerry
JUpton Consulting;Qualcomm
300
M
Y
Valbonesi
Lucia
Motorola
2007
M
Y
Watanabe
Fujio
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
265
M
Y
Wieczorek
Alfred
Motorola
1331
M
Y
Wilson
Joanne
ArrayComm
1754
M
Y
Yaghoobi
Hassan
Intel
411
M
Y
Yeh
Choongil
ETRI
302
M
Y
Yin
Hujun
Intel
M
Y
Agrawal
Avneesh
Qualcomm
2982
M
Ali
Murtaza
Texas Instruments
1199
M
Alphonse
Jean
Lucent Technologies
3123
M
Barriac
Gwen
Qualcomm
2342
M
Bernstein
Jeffrey
TMG
1327
M
Bravin
Nancy
Individual
262
M
Bussey
Chris
Bussey Consulting
447
M
Cai
Sean
ZTE Communications
678
M
Carlo
Jim
757
M
Carneiro
Edson
Huawei
Edmais Computer Services (Brazilian
Comp.)
1500
M
Carson
Peter
Qualcomm
979
M
Castell
Harold P.
BCSI
335
M
10
Chickneas
Jim
Consultant/Qualcomm
1346
M
Chion
Hua Mary
ZTE Communications
2093
M
Chong
Chia-Chin
DoCoMo USA Labs
1192
M
Chun
Jin Young
LGE
1190
M
Cleveland
Joseph
Samsung
2788
M
Dean
Chris
TMG Telecom
2068
M
Dodd
Donald
Case Communications
337
M
Dorward
Lynne
Ladcomm Corp
1355
M
Dunn
Doug
Kyocera TRC
3050
M
Feder
Peretz
Lucent
184
M
Ferguson
Alistair
Selbourne Associates
998
M
Freeland
Graham
Steepest Ascent Ltd
3184
M
Gal
Dan
Lucent
562
M
Garcia-Alis
Daniel
Univ. of Strathclyde
618
M
Garg
Deepshikha
Kyocera TRC
1979
M
Giles
Arthur
1820
M
Gomes
Eladio
USGT
Double E Enterprises (Brazilian
companies int)
1494
M
Gorodetsky
Svetlana
Gorodetsky Consulting
1410
M
Gorokhov
Alexei
Qualcomm Inc.
3064
M
Ho
Jin-Meng
Texas Instruments
519
M
Howard
Fred
Network Consulting Services
2891
M
Humbert
John
Sprint
834
M
Huo
David
Lucent
1853
M
Iimuro
Kazuyoshi
Kyocera
3183
M
James
David S.
Oak Global BV
Jeong
Moo Ryong
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
Jeong
Byung-Jang
Ji
M
769
M
ETRI
3225
M
Tingfang
Qualcomm Inc.
3113
M
Jones
Dennis
Taliesen North Consulting
1252
M
Kadous
Tamer
Qualcomm
2977
M
11
Kalhan
Amit
Kyocera TRC
3049
M
Kasch
William
John Hopkins Univ.
2570
M
Khademi
Majid
Khademi Consulting
506
M
Khandekar
Aamod
Qualcomm Inc
2976
M
Khatibi
Farrokh
Qualcomm
1274
M
Kim
Yong Ho
LG Electronics
2462
M
Kimura
Shigeru
Kyocera
791
M
Kitahara
Minako
Kyocera
602
M
Knisely
Douglas
Airvana
2943
M
Ko
Young-Jo
ETRI
3200
M
Kwon
Young Hyoun
LG Electronics
3087
M
Lalaguna
Pablo
MedStar
1440
M
Lawrence
Lisa
CTCI Group
1194
M
Martynov
Irina
Belgud International
1408
M
Martynov
Michael
Belgud International
1409
M
McMahon
Anthony
Steepest Ascent
3101
M
McMillan
Donald
Adv. Network Tech. Solutions
1010
M
Miyazono
Max
Qualcomm
2097
M
Murakami
Kazuhiro
Kyocera
798
M
Murphy
Peter
Intel Corp.
2621
M
Naguib
Ayman
Qualcomm
681
M
Naidu
Mullaguru
Qualcomm
93
M
Nakano
Shinji
Kyocera TRC
2245
M
Nguyen
Nha
BCSI
1398
M
Nicolas
Julien
Kyocera Research
1921
M
Novick
Fred
Bussey Consulting
1157
M
O'Brien
Francis
Lucent
Patzer
Steve
Intel
122
M
Pfann
Eugen
Univ. of Strathclyde
3081
M
Ping
Luo
Panasonic Singapore
Pittampalli
Eshwar
Lucent
M
M
2802
M
12
Poisson
Sebastien
OasisWireless
227
M
Polcari
Amy
Bussey Consulting
501
M
Polsgrove
Jim
JKB Global
1452
M
Preece
Rob
BCSI
320
M
Rajkumar
Ajay
Lucent
440
M
Sampath
Hemanth
Qualcomm
2633
M
Sano
Masato
Kyocera TRC
2244
M
Shields
Judy
Ladcomm Corp.
1384
M
Shively
David
Cingular Wireless
626
M
Springer
Warren
Springer Assoc./Independent
405
M
Staver
Doug
3581969Canada Inc.
358
M
Sutivong
Arak
TRUE Corporation
579
M
Suzuki
Tomohiro
KYOCERA Corp.
3182
M
Teague
Harris
Qualcomm, Inc.
2978
M
Toro
Steven
Sane Solutions LLC
Trick
John
Bussey Consulting
Ulupinar
Fatih
Valls
M
695
M
Qualcomm
2934
M
Juan Carlos
TMG Group
1432
M
Vijayan
Rajiv
Qualcomm, Inc.
2979
M
Vivanco
Silvia
TMG
1029
M
Wasilewski
Thomas
Qualcomm
2034
M
Wu
Gang
NTT DoCoMo USA Labs
1004
M
Yallapragada
Rao
Qualcomm
3162
M
Youssefmir
Michael
ArrayComm
1582
M
Yuda
Yuza
Tetsuya
Masaaki
Kyocera TRC
NEC infrontia
758
24
M
M
Appendix B:
13
802.20 Proposed Detail Level Agenda – May 2006 Interim, Session #20
Hyatt Regency, Jacksonville, Florida
Agenda items are for time allocation and adjourn maybe earlier if all agenda items are completed . As approved 5/15/06
Monday, May 15, 2006 8:00AM – 10:00AM
IEEE 802 Opening Plenary
Monday, May 15, 2006 11:00AM - 12:30PM (Lunch 12:30-1:30PM
-
Opening Session of 802.20
- IEEE IPR rules and meeting conduct
- Logistics for the session
- Quorum Call
- Review of Proposed 802.20 Agenda
- Approval of Agenda including modifications
- Review and approve March Minutes
- Current Status of Letter Ballot
11:00am-12:30pm
Monday, May 15, 2006 1:30PM – 5:00PM Hyatt
Contributions
- Proposed Traffic Modeling Ad Hoc (L. Razoumov & H. Yin)
- Systematic Problems with Current Draft (A. Jette & J. Mollenauer)
- Suggestion for LB Resolution Results (J. Lin & T.Hu)
1:30-5:00pm
1:30-2:15pm
2:15-2:45pm
2:45-3:15pm
Break
3:45:-4:15pm
- Suggestions on Improvements for LB1 Comment Resolution Results (A. Tee,
C. Koo & DS Park)
4:15-5:00pm
- Suggestion on Remedy for Missing Tx/Rx Requirement (A. Tee and others)
C802.20-06/18
C802.20-06/22
C802.20-06/23
C802.20-06/24
C802.20-06/26
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 8:00AM - 12:00PM Hyatt (Break 10 – 10:30am)
802.20 Comment Resolution Process for LB1 (A. Tee & Others)
Response to 06/14r1 Questions (J. Tomcik)
Response to Queries in 06.14r1 (R. Canchi)
F-SSCH Performance (J. Tomick)
Other Contributions, if agreed and available
8:00-9:00am
9:00am-9:30am
9:30am-10:00am
10:30am-11:00am
Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:00PM – 5:00PM Hyatt (Break 3:30 – 4:00PM)
Other Contributions, if agreed and available
New Business
Next Meeting Planning
Close and Adjourn
1:00pm- 2:00pm
2:00pm- 3:00pm
3:00pm- 3:30pm
4:00pm -5:00pm
C802.20-06/25
C802.20-06/19
C802.20-06/21
C802.20-06/20
14
Appendix C: Attendance and Participation Credit
Last Name
First Name
Company/Organization
Reg.
ID
Attendance
May Credit
Agis
Edward
Intel Corp
410
Yes
Yes
Ahmadi
Sassan
Intel
3149
Yes
Yes
Ahn
Jae Young
ETRI
2783
Yes
Yes
Alamouti
Siavash
Intel
564
Yes
Yes
Arefi
Reza
Intel
2083
Yes
Yes
Austin
Mark
OFCOM
1418
Yes
No
Baum
Kevin
Motorola
891
Yes
Yes
Bavafa
Moussa
Broadcom
3348
Yes
Yes
Canchi
Radhakrishna
Kyocera
745
Yes
Yes
Chae
Suchang
ETRI
3478
Yes
Yes
Chang
Young Bin
Samsung
3477
Yes
Yes
Chen
Yao
Samsumg BST
3508
Yes
Yes
Cho
Soonmi
Samsung Electronics
3350
Yes
Yes
Choi
Yang-Seok
Intel
642
Yes
Yes
Chong
Chia-Chin
DoCoMo USA Labs
1192
Yes
Yes
Comstock
David
Huawei
3299
Yes
Yes
Eilts
Henry
Texas Instruments
2476
Yes
Yes
El-Rayes
Mohamed
Samsung
3507
Yes
Yes
Epstein
Mark
Qualcomm
999
Yes
Yes
Guo
Qiang
Motorola
871
Yes
Yes
Herold
Barry
Motorola
1026
Yes
No
Hong
Songnam
Samsung
3447
Yes
Yes
Hou
Victor
Broadcom
2075
Yes
Yes
Hu
Rose
Nortel
3269
Yes
Yes
Hu
Teck
Siemens
3483
Yes
Yes
Hur
Yerang
Posdata America R&D
763
Yes
Yes
Ikeda
Yutaka
Sharp Corporation
3448
Yes
No
Jette
Alan
Motorola
2981
Yes
Yes
Ji
Baowei
Samsung TA
1222
Yes
Yes
Joo
Pan Yuh
Samsung
1242
Yes
Yes
15
Kiernan
Brian
Interdigital Com.
577
Yes
Yes
Kim
Tae Young
Samsung
2901
Yes
Yes
Kim
Young-Ho
Samsung
1425
Yes
Yes
Kim
Youngsoo
Samsung
47
Yes
Yes
Kim
Hyeon Soo
Samsung
3656
Yes
Yes
Kim
Jae-Ho
ETRI
3543
Yes
Yes
Kitamura
Takuya
Fujitsu
1277
Yes
Yes
Klerer
Mark
Qualcomm
1533
Yes
Yes
Knisely
Douglas
Airvana
2943
Yes
Yes
Kolze
Tom
Broadcom
932
Yes
Yes
Koo
Changhoi
Samsung
2379
Yes
Yes
Koplyay
Ferenc
Freescale
3423
Yes
Yes
Kwon
Dong Seung
ETRI
1523
Yes
Yes
Lee
Heesoo
ETRI
2797
Yes
Yes
Lee
Wook-Bong
LG Electronics
3092
Yes
Yes
Lestable
Thierry
SERI
3563
Yes
Yes
Li
Jun
Nortel Natworks
2524
Yes
Yes
Li
Thomas
Huawei
2166
Yes
Yes
Li
Yingyang
Samsung BST
3556
Yes
Yes
Lim
Hyoung Kyu
Samsung
1234
Yes
Yes
Lin
Jiezhen
Siemens Ltd., China
1764
Yes
Yes
Liu
Walter
Huawei
3387
Yes
Yes
Lu
Jianmin
Huawei
3001
Yes
Yes
Ma
Steven
Freescale Semi.
2086
Yes
Yes
Mollenauer
James
Technical Strategy/Motorola
205
Yes
Yes
Noh
Taegyun
ETRI
3542
Yes
Yes
Odlyzko
Paul
Motorola
433
Yes
Yes
Oguma
Hiroshi
Institute MIyagi Pref
43
Yes
Yes
Oh
Changyoon
Samsung
3452
Yes
Yes
Ovadia
Shlomo
Intel
321
Yes
Yes
Panicker
John
Nortel
3369
Yes
Yes
16
Park
Chul
ERTI
1435
Yes
Yes
Park
DS
Samsung
1373
Yes
Yes
Park
Jeongho
Samsung
3448
Yes
Yes
Park
Won-Hyoung
Samsung AIT
3171
Yes
Yes
Patzer
Steve
Intel
122
Yes
Yes
Perini
Patrick
EFR, Inc./IPWireless
3240
Yes
No
Pirhonen
Riku
Nokia
249
Yes
Yes
Prakash
Rajat
Qualcomm
1520
Yes
Yes
Puthenkulam
Jose
Intel
451
Yes
Yes
Qian
Xiaoshu
Intel
3090
Yes
Yes
Ragsdale
James
Ericsson
498
Yes
Yes
Rajadurai
Rajavelsamy
Samsung India Software
3510
Yes
Yes
Roy
Richard
953
Yes
No
Santhanakrishnan
Anand
SRA, Inc.
Samsung India Software
(SISO)
3503
Yes
Yes
Sasaki
Shigenobu
Niigata University
3352
Yes
Yes
Semper
Bill
Samsung
3609
Yes
Yes
Seo
Bangwon
ETRI
3541
Yes
Yes
Shoji
Hiryuki
Kyocera
3628
Yes
Yes
Shono
Takashi
Intel
83
Yes
Yes
Sihn
Gyung Chul
ETRI
3523
Yes
Yes
Son
Yeongmoon
Samsung
1233
Yes
Yes
Song
Young Seog
ETRI
3393
Yes
Yes
Srinivasan
Roshni
Intel
3485
Yes
Yes
Stuby
Richard
Agere Systems
1699
Yes
Yes
Suh
Changho
Samsung Electronics
3147
Yes
Yes
Suh
Mark
Samsung TA
3565
Yes
Yes
Surcobe
Valentin
Motorola
2896
Yes
Yes
Tee
Lai-King Anna
Samsung
844
Yes
Yes
Tomcik
James
Qualcomm
857
Yes
Yes
Upton
Jerry
JUpton Consulting;Qualcomm
300
Yes
Yes
17
Vaidya
Rahul
Samsung
3502
Yes
Yes
Valbonesi
Lucia
Motorola
2007
Yes
Yes
Warren
Craig
Freescale
293
Yes
No
Wieczorek
Alfred
Motorola
1331
Yes
Yes
Wilson
Joanne
ArrayComm
1754
Yes
Yes
Wu
Geng
Nortel
230
Yes
Yes
Yaghoobi
Hassan
Intel
411
Yes
Yes
Yeh
Choongil
ETRI
302
Yes
Yes
Yin
Hujun
Intel
924
Yes
Yes
Yun
Jungnam
POSDATA
266
Yes
Yes