IEEE C802.20-05/79
Project
IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access
<http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/20/>
Title
BEST-WINE: Technology Performance Presentation 1
Date Submitted
2005-OCT-28
Source(s)
Radhakrishna Canchi
2480 N. First Street #280
San Jose, CA 95131
Kazuhiro Murakami
2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku,
Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN
Miinako Kithara
2-1-1 Kagahara, Tsuzuki-ku,
Yokohama, KANAGAWA 224-8502, JAPAN
Re:
MBWA Call for Proposal
Abstract
This document presents the Technology Performance and Evaluation Crtieria Report 1 of the Tehcnlogy Proposal BEST-WINE for IEEE 802.
20 MBWA
Purpose
To disucus and Adopt BEST-WINE for Draft Specfications of IEEE802.20 MBWA
Notice
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.20 Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the
contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The
contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof,
in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include
portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards
publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.20.
Patent Policy
The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3> and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development
<http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/guide.html>.
Submission
Voice: +1-408-952-4701
Fax: +1-408-954-8709
Email: cradhak@ktrc-na.com
Voice: +81 45 943 6130
Fax: +81 45 943 6175
Email: kazuhiro_murakami@csg.kyocera.co.jp
Voice: +81 45 943 6102
Fax: +81 45 943 6175
Email: minako.kitahara.nf@kyocera.jp
Slide 1
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
BEST-WINE
(Broadband MobilE SpaTial Wireless InterNet
AcEess )
Technology Performance
Presentation
IEEE 802.20 Plenary Meeting
Vancouver, Canada
November 14-18, 2005
Submission
IEEE C802.20-05/79
BEST-WINE
(Broadband MobilE SpaTial Wireless InterNet
AcEess )

Proposed Draft Technology Specifications
■
Enhanced MAC Layer and PHY layer Draft
Specifications to the base specifications of HC-SDMA*
AND
■
●
Base Technical Specifications “ATIS-PP-0700004-2005, High
Capacity-Spatial Division Multiple Access (HC-SDMA)*”.
●
* The copyright of this document is owned by the Alliance for
Telecommunications Industry Solutions. Any request to reproduce this
document, or portion thereof, shall be directed to ATIS, 1200 G Street,
NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005.
* For Electornic Downloads, Paper Copy or CD-ROM please follow
the link https://www.atis.org/atis/docstore/doc_display.asp?ID=3617
●
Submission
Slide 3
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
BEST-WINE






IEEE C802.20-05/79
Technology Performance
Outline of Presentation
System Model
RF Parameters
Link budget
Basic PHY layer (link level) information
Simulation environment
Simulation Results
■ Link Level
■ System Level
 Conclusion
Submission
Slide 4
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System Calibration Model
BS/MS MAP for IEEE802.20
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
Y-axis [km]
2.0
1.0
-11.0 -10.0 -9.0 -8.0 -7.0 -6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0
0.0
-1.0 0.0
-1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0 11.0
MS
BS
-2.0
-3.0
-4.0
-5.0
-6.0
-7.0
X-axis [km]
Submission
Slide 5
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System Model
5
4
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
-1
-6
-4
-2
-1
0
2
4
6
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-5
-4
-5
Submission
Slide 6
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
RF Parameters
#
RF Parameter
TDD System BW
1
2
3
Transmitter Power -- BS
Transmitter Power -- MS
Out of Band emission limits – BS and MS (emission
measured in 1 MHz resolution bandwidth)
4*
ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent
channel (same Ch BW) – BS
ACLR - Attenuation of emissions into an adjacent
channel (same Ch BW) – MS
Receiver noise figure -- BS
Receiver noise figure -- MS
Receiver reference sensitivity (to be proposed by each
technology)
Receiver Selectivity -- BS
Receiver Selectivity -- MS
5*
6
7
8
9*
10*
#
11[*]
12[*]
Submission
Base Value
1 MHz Channel
Frequency offset for Blocking
Receiver Blocking – BS (level of same technology
blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel
BW)
Receiver Blocking – MS (level of same technology
blocking signal at frequency offset of 2 times Channel
BW)
Slide 7
2.5 MHz
TDD SYSTEM
43 dBm/MHz
27 dBm
Attenuation of the
transmit power P by: 43
+10 log(P) dB
43 dB
+44 dBm
+27 dBm
-13 dBm
36.8 dB
35.4 dB
5 dB
10 dB
Specify at BER of 0.1%
5 dB
10 dB
See linkbudget
Mod 1 /Mod 7 : 30 dB
Mod 1 : 30 dB
Mod 8 : 27 dB
4MHz off
Mod 1 : -49.6 dBm
Mod 7 : -35.6 dBm
30 dB
30 dB
27 dB
5MHz off
-49.6 dBm
-35.6 dBm
Mod 1 : -57.5 dBm
Mod 8 : - 41.6 dBm
-57.5dBm
-41.6dBm
50.2 dB
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC Layer
information
 Channel Configuration
Items
Duplexing
Mutiple Access
Carrier space
Frame Lenght
symbol duration
Uplink Time Slot
slots
Length
Payload
Downlink Time Slot
slots
Length
Payload
Symbol rate
Submission
Specification
TDD
TDMA ・SDMA
625 kHz
5 ms
2usec
3
545 us
182 symbols
3
1090 us
494 symbols
500 ksps
Slide 8
625kHz
frequency
2.5MHz
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
BEST-WINE System’s PHY and MAC
Layer information
 Modulation class
ModClass
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 *1
10 *2
Modulation
Method
BPSK
BPSK+
QPSK
QPSK+
8PSK
8PSK+
12QAM
16QAM
24QAM
24QAM+
64QAM
Down Link(Kbps)
Data Rate
Data Rate
/Carrier
/Slot
35
50
82
126
162
198
262
307
354
422
491
106
149
245
379
485
595
787
922
1061
1267
1473
Up Link(Kbps)
Data Rate
Data Rate
/Carrier
/Slot
6
13
26
43
58
72
98
115
132.8
162.5
188.7
19
38
77
130
173
216
293
346
398
487
566
*1 24QAM+ perform error coding which has 3/4 coding rate.
*2 64QAM perform error coding which has 5/6 coding rate.
Submission
Slide 9
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Simulation Channel Environments
 Suburban Macro at 3KMPH
 Suburban Macro at 120 KMPH
Submission
Slide 10
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Basic PHY layer (link level) information
 Link Level simulation Parameters
■ TDD /TDMA system
■ 3 timeslot structure
■ BS antenna number 12antennas
■ UT antenna number 4antennas
■ Tx 1antenna / Rx 4 or 1 antennas
■ Adaptive Array Antenna (MMSE)
■ Equalizer : Equalizer has been employed to
over come multipath Distortion effects.
Submission
Slide 11
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Channel models used in Link Level Simulations
 Link Level simulation specified channel model
Models
PDP
case-iii
case-Iv
Pedestrian-B (Phase I)
Vehicular-B (Phase I)
6
Delay (ns)
Relative
Path power
(dB)
Number of Paths
Mobile
Station
Speed (km/h)
Base Station
6
0
200
800
1200
2300
3700
-2.5
0
-12.8
-10.0
-25.2
-16.0
120
0
300
8900
12900
17100
20000
Topology
0.5λ
PAS
RMS angle spread of 35 degrees per
path with a Laplacian distribution
DoT (degrees)
-22.5
22.5
AoA (degrees)
67.5 (all paths)
67.5 (all paths)
Topology
Submission
0
-0.9
-4.9
-8.0
-7.8
-23.9
3
PAS
AoD/AoA
(degrees)
0.5λ
RMS angle spread of 35 degrees per
path with a Laplacian distribution
10λ-spacing
Laplacian distribution with RMS angle spread of 2 degrees per path
depending on AoA/AoD
50 for 2 RMS angle spread per path 20 for 5 RMS angle spread per
path
Slide 12
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Sub-path Spatial parameters AoD and AoA
offset
 sub-path AoD and AoA offset
Sub-path #　(m)
1, 2
3, 4
5, 6
7, 8
9, 10
11, 12
13, 14
15, 16
17, 18
19, 20
Submission
Offset for a 2 deg AS at BS
(Macrocell)
 n ,m ,AoD (degrees)










0.0894
0.2826
0.4984
0.7431
1.0257
1.3594
1.7688
2.2961
3.0389
4.3101
Slide 13
Offset for a 35 deg AS at
MS
 n ,m ,AoA (degrees)










1.5649
4.9447
8.7224
13.0045
17.9492
23.7899
30.9538
40.1824
53.1816
75.4274
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System level Simulation environment
 simulation target feature
TDD system
3 timeslot structure
Spatial Divison multiple Access feature (Max. 4 )
Power control
Link adaptation
Submission
Slide 14
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System level Simulation environment
simulation parameters
•BS antenna number 12antennas (10λ)
•UT antenna number 4antennas(0.5λ)
•19BS 3sector
•BS max Tx power 39dBm/12ant
•UT max Tx power 27dBm
•BS antenna gain 17dBi
•UT antenna gain 0dBi
•BS NF 5dB
•UT NF 10dB
•Temperature 15℃
•BS cable loss 3dB
•UT body loss 3dB
•1carrier (625KHz). Simulation ( 1.25MHz BW= 625kHz ×4carrier)
Submission
Slide 15
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System level simulation channel model
 channel model
Channel Scenario
Number of paths (N)
Number of sub-paths (M) per-path
Mean AS at BS
Suburban Macro
6
20
E[  AS ] =50
AS at BS as a lognormal RV
 AS
 AS  10 ^   AS x   AS  , x ~ (0,1)
rAS   AoD /  AS
= 0.13
1.2
20
Per-path AS at BS (Fixed)
BS per-path AoD Distribution standard
distribution
(0,  2AoD )
where
 AoD  r AS  AS
Mean AS at MS
Per-path AS at MS (fixed)
MS Per-path AoA Distribution
E[AS, MS] = 680
350
Delay spread as a lognormal RV
DS = - 6.80
DS = 0.288
Mean total RMS Delay Spread
E[  DS ] = 0.17 s
 DS  10 ^   DS x   DS  , x ~ (0,1)
rDS   delays /  DS
Slide 16
(0,  2AoA (Pr))
1.4
Distribution for path delays
Lognormal shadowing standard deviation
Pathloss model (dB), d is in meters
Submission
 AS
= 0.69
10dB
31.5 + 35log10(d)
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Uplink (VehicularB model) FER vs SINR Performance
fer
1
120km /h m od7
120km /h m od6
120km /h m od5
120km /h m od4
120km /h m od3
120km /h m od2
120km /h m od1
120km /h m od0
0.1
0.01
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
sinr [dB ]
Submission
Slide 17
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Downlink (Vehicular B model) FER vs SINR Performance
fer
1
120km /h m od8
120km /h m od7
120km /h m od6
120km /h m od5
120km /h m od4
120km /h m od3
120km /h m od2
120km /h m od1
120km /h m od0
0.1
0.01
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
sinr [dB ]
Submission
Slide 18
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Uplink (PedestrianB model) FER vs SINR Performance
1
fer
3km /h m od7
3km /h m od6
3km /h m od5
3km /h m od4
3km /h m od3
3km /h m od2
3km /h m od1
3km /h m od0
0.1
0.01
-10
Submission
-5
0
5
10
sinr [dB ]
Slide 19
15
20
25
30
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Downlink (PedestrianB model) FER vs SINR Performance
fer
1
3km /h m od8
3km /h m od7
3km /h m od6
3km /h m od5
3km /h m od4
3km /h m od3
3km /h m od2
3km /h m od1
3km /h m od0
0.1
0.01
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
sinr [dB ]
Submission
Slide 20
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Uplink (Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR
400
350
300
120km /h m od7
120km /h m od6
120km /h m od5
120km /h m od4
120km /h m od3
120km /h m od2
120km /h m od1
120km /h m od0
kbps
250
200
150
100
50
0
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
sinr [dB ]
Submission
Slide 21
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Downlink( Vehicular B model) Throughput vs SINR
1200
120km /h m od8
120km /h m od7
120km /h m od6
120km /h m od5
120km /h m od4
120km /h m od3
120km /h m od2
120km /h m od1
120km /h m od0
1000
kbps
800
600
400
200
0
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
sinr[dB ]
Submission
Slide 22
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Uplink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR
400
350
300
kbps
250
3km /h m od7
3km /h m od6
3km /h m od5
3km /h m od4
3km /h m od3
3km /h m od2
3km /h m od1
3km /h m od0
200
150
100
50
0
-10
Submission
-5
0
5
10
sinr [dB ]
Slide 23
15
20
25
30
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Link level simulation Result
 Downlink (Pedestrian B model) Throughput vs SINR
1200
3km /h m od8
3km /h m od7
3km /h m od6
3km /h m od5
3km /h m od4
3km /h m od3
3km /h m od2
3km /h m od1
3km /h m od0
1000
kbps
800
600
400
200
0
-10
Submission
-5
0
5
10
sinr[dB]
Slide 24
15
20
25
30
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System level simulation calibration result
 System level simulation calibration condition and parameters
Path number: 1
Environment: Suburban macro
BS & MS antenna number: 1
Inter BS separation: 2.5km
1carrier(625kHz).
1 user/timeslot @sector
user1 (-60, R/2) @timeslot1
user2 (0,R/2)@timeslot2
user3 (60, R)@ timeslot3
(degree, distance from the BS)
Submission
Slide 25
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
System level simulation result
 User Date Rate CDF
Submission
Slide 26
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 120km/h
User Date Rate CDF
Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF.
Submission
Slide 27
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 3km/h Uplink and Downlink
Blue line shows downlink throughput CDF. Red line shows uplink throughput CDF.
Submission
Slide 28
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation
Downlink
3 Kmph
C ontours of constant(3km /h-D L)
48
Load:N um ber of users/c ell
42
100kbps
36
300kbps
30
700kbps
24
800kbps
18
1000kbps
12
6
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
C overage: Inter-basestation seperration (km )
Submission
Slide 29
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation
Downlink
120 Kmph
C ontours of constant(120km /h-D L)
48
Load:N um ber of users/ cell
42
36
10kbps
30
30kbps
24
50kbps
18
100kbps
150kbps
12
6
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
C overage: Inte r-basestation seperration (km )
Submission
Slide 30
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation
Uplink
3 Kmph
C ontours of constant(3km /h-U L)
48
Load:N um ber of users/c ell
42
36
100kbps
30
150kbps
300kbps
24
340kbps
18
12
6
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
C overage: Inte r-basestation seperration (km )
Submission
Slide 31
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 Aggregated Throughput vs Base station Sepparation
Uplink
120 Kmph
C ontours of constant(120km /h-U L)
48
Load:N um ber of users/c ell
42
50kbps
36
100kbps
150kbps
30
250kbps
24
300kbps
18
12
6
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
C overage: Inte r-basestation seperration (km )
Submission
Slide 32
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
 Fairness criteria
The CDF of the Normalized throughput with Respect to average user throughput was deatermined for Cell radius 1km.
Table 8-1 Suburban Pedestrian B Case
Normalized throughput with
Respect to average user
throughput
<0.1
<0.2
<0.5
Table 8-2
Downlink
0.142%
0.285%
0.285%
0.0%
0.142%
0.142%
Suburban Vehicular B Case
Normalized throughput with
Respect to average user
throughput
<0.1
<0.2
<0.5
Submission
Uplink
Uplink
Downlink
0%
0%
0.432%
0
0
0.519%
Slide 33
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Summary Results-Simulation
Submission
Spectral Efficiency @pedestrian B
Spectral Efficiency @Vehicular B
Uplink
3.155
2.592
Downlink
4.248
1.776
Slide 34
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA
IEEE C802.20-05/79
Practical System Results
Data Flow
Direction
Typical/Terminal
Total Data
Rates/Basestation
Spectrum
Efficiency
(bit/sec/Hz/sector)
Downlink
942kbps
22.6Mbps
6.8
Uplink
Uplink
290kbps
1,232kbps
7.0Mbps
29.6Mbps
4.2
5.9
Figure 7-14: Date Rate and Spectrum Efficency Test Results of HC-SDMA in Australia
Submission
Slide 35
R.Canchi, K. Murakami and M. Kitahara, KYOCERA