Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard & IMT-Advanced Submission IEEE 802.16m-09/0019 2009-05-19

advertisement
2009-05-19
IEEE 802.16m-09/0019
Work Plan for IEEE 802.16m Standard
& IMT-Advanced Submission
1
Documents to be Developed in TGm
• TGm will develop the following documents as part of 802.16m
standardization process:
– System Requirements Document (SRD)
• A set of possible deployment scenarios and applications of the 802.16m
standard.
• A set of performance targets and features that 802.16m compliantsystems
shall meet or exceed.
– Evaluation Methodology Document (EMD)
• A complete set of parameters, models, and methodologies for the link-level
and system-level simulations that allow fair evaluation/comparison of various
technical proposals.
• Channels Models: A set of spatial channel model parameters are specified to
characterize particular features of MIMO radio channels to be used for
simulating technical proposals for the future 802.16m standard.
– System Description Document (SDD)
• Architecture and design of the 802.16m air interface amendment
• Captures the core technical concepts behind the features included in the
amendment
• Will enable analysis and/or simulations for characterizing the coarse level
performance benefits of the air interface in association with the Evaluation
Methodology Document
– 802.16m amendment
– 802.16 IMT-Advanced Proposal
2
TGm Timelines
Q2
IEEE 802.16
System
Requirements
IEEE 802.16m
Evaluation
Methodology
System
Description
IMT
Advanced
Proposal
2007
Q3
Q4
Q1
2008
Q2
Q3
ITU-R IMT Advanced
Circular
Letter
IMT.EVAL
Q1
Q2
2009
Q3
Q4
2010
Q2
Q3
Q1
Sep ’07*
Amendment Ready for IMTAdv evaluation
Jan’08*
Amendment Feature Complete.
EC Conditional Approval for SB.
Nov ’07
EC Conditional Approval for
RevCom submission
Jan 09*
Amendment Ready for
Industry Release.
RevCom submission
ITU based Updates
Jan ’09
Sept ’09*
Final Proposal
Nov ’08
Refinements
July ’09
Working Doc
Jan’10
Letter Ballot
May ’10
Sponsor Ballot
Jun ’08
Jun ’08
ITU based potential updates
Oct ’08
Jan’09
Oct ’09
Proposal Submission
IMT.RSPEC
Q4
Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec
802.16m
Amendment
IMT.TECH
Q4
Jun ’10
Proposal Evaluation & Consensus Building
Develop Recommendation
ITU-R WP5D
Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul AugSep Oct Nov Dec
*System Requirements and Evaluation Methodology, System Description, IMT-Advanced Proposal
Documents may be further updated based on ITU output (shown by dotted lines).
3
3
Process for staging 802.16m Amendment feature
development
PHY/MAC
features
required for
IMTAdvanced for
a working
system
P802.16m draft
AWD
Feature inclusion vote
50%
SB
WG LB
75%
Final feature addition meeting
50%
Feature 1
RG
Feature 2
RG
Feature N
RG
Feature N+1
Amendment Feature development:
-Feature developed as a RG contribution to TGm
-Finally included only as a complete proposal, not a partial one
-Develop as a self contained clause/subclause unless it is essential
-Do not put place holders in Amendment till the feature is ready.
(SDD will still have all features)
-RGs should track Amendment development for consistency
-WG LB recirculation scope should allow feature addition
-All features have to go thru at least one WG LB recirculation
Next Project (New PAR)
RG
AWD = Amendment Working Doc
RG = Rapporteur Group
LB = Letter Ballot
4
SB= Sponsor
Ballot
Feature RG process for the Amendment
• Feature Rapporteur Groups (RG) will develop contributions for
adoption by TGm as per Process (in previous slide)
• RGs will be authorized/re-authorized at each TGm session
• TGm will provide final deadlines for completion of RG work.
• RG must start with a work plan based on TGm final deadlines.
• RGs must report progress at every TGm session
• RG final output contribution must be complete by TGm deadlines for
adoption into the AWD/Draft
• RGs may meet during TGm sessions
• RGs can arrange teleconferences with 7 day advance notice
• RGs conduct straw polls for decision making
• RGs are open to all participants
5
Amendment Feature RG timelines
SDD
Cha
pter
Features to be
discussed in RGs
Essential for
IMT-Adv. at
Amendment
level detail
CFC Issued for Feature
RG Target for
completion
12
Inter-Radio Access
Technology Functions
(No SDD text)
No
NA
----
13
LBS
No
To be decided in July’09
Nov’09
14
E-MBS
No
To be decided in July’09
Nov’09
15
Relay
No
To be decided in July’09
Nov’09
16
Co-deployment and Coexistence (No SDD text.
Section deleted this
session)
No
NA
----
17
Femtocell
No
May’09
Sept’09
18
Self organizing networks
No
To be decided in July’09
Nov’09
20
Interference Mitigation
No
Mar’09
Sept’09
22
Inter-ABS
Synchronization
No
To be decided in July’09
Nov’09
6
Download