AY 2014-2015 ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW SELF-STUDY TEMPLATE
Reporting School/College: Tobin College of Business
Program Reviewed: Business (Executive Management) MBA SI
Date Submitted to Department/Division Chair:
Overview and Program Review Summary: Please summarize this program’s mission and its relationship to the vision
and mission of St. John’s University, and the program’s School/College. Identify similar programs regionally and
nationally and distinguish this program from them. In addition, summarize your findings as they relate to (1) program
quality, (2) market growth potential, and (3) student learning. Also, summarize any significant changes, achievements
(by faculty and students and the program itself), and plans for the future. Finally, based on the information gleaned
from the data in the self-study, give an overall rating of the program’s Enrollment/Market Potential by categorizing it as
one of the following: (1) Enhance; (2) Maintain; (3) Reduce support, Phase out, Consolidate, or Discontinue.
(Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 1. The purpose of the program reflects and supports the strategic vision and mission of St. John’s
University, and the program’s School/College.
1a.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the Catholic, Vincentian, and
metropolitan identity of St. John’s University? www.stjohns.edu/about/out-mission. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
1b.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the University’s vision.
www.stjohns.edu/about/out-mission/vision-statement. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
1c.
What evidence can you provide that demonstrates that the program embodies the vision and mission of the
program’s School/College? (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 1.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 2. The program attracts, retains, and graduates high quality students.
2a.
Undergraduate SAT and High School Average
Not Applicable
2b.
Undergraduate 1st Year Retention Rate
Not Applicable
2c.
Undergraduate 6 Year Graduation Rate
Not Applicable
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 1
2d.
Graduate Standardized Test Scores
Fall
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
516
495
488
Program
School/College
Average Rate
469
Regional Comparison
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
National Comparison
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Fall 2012
Business Administration
Executive Management
Fall 2012
Peter J.Tobin Col of Bus-GR SI
488
MBA
SI
477
Fall 2013
477
General test percentage distribution of scores within intended graduate major field that is based on the profile of GMAT
candidates, 2011-12.
GMAT®
Degree Pursued
Gender
Executive MBA (EMBA)
Men: Number
Mean Total
Score
Women:
Number
Mean Total
Score
Total: Number
Mean Total Score
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
2010-11
2011-12
5,643
6,339
547
2,140
516
548
2,491
520
7,783
8,830
538
540
Self-Study Template 2
2e.
Please describe how the program compares with peer and aspirational institutions.
(Suggested limit 1/2 page)
2f.
If applicable, describe the program’s student performance over the past five years on licensure or professional
certification exams relative to regional and national standards. (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
2g.
Number of majors and minors enrolled over the past five years. See table below.
Fall
Number of Students
2006
2007
2008
2009
Majors
13
12
7
7
7
Minors
0
0
0
0
0
Total
13
12
7
7
7
BUS (EXEC MGT)
2h.
2005
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Majors
Majors
Majors
MBA
3
1
4
Number of degrees granted during the past five years. See table below.
Academic Year
Degrees
Granted
MBA
TCB-GR-SI
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
2
2
4
4
1
EXECUTIVE MGT
MBA
10/11
12/13
Degrees
Conferred
Degrees
Conferred
1
4
*Note: There were no students that graduated from 11/12 academic year.
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 3
Below is comparison degrees conferred data for local and national institutions based on data retrieved from the IPEDS
website. This is based on the Classification of Instructional Program (CIP) Code of 52-Business, Management, Marketing,
and Related Support Services.
20092010
20102011
20112012
Master's
Local
4,898
National 177,684
5,532
5,719
187,213
191,571
1
Local institution include: Adelphi University, Columbia University, CUNY Queens College, Fordham University,
Hofstra University, Iona College, C.W. Post University, Manhattan College, New York University, Pace University,
Seton Hall University, Stony Brook University, and Wagner College.
Comments : Based on the data in 2g and 2h, how do these trends compare to institutional, regional and national
patterns? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
2i.
What mechanisms are in place to monitor students’ progress toward degree? And, to what extent is there a
collaborative effort to provide quality advising and support services to students? (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
2j.
If available, provide information on the success of graduates in this program as it relates to employment or
attending graduate school. (Suggested limit 1/4 page)
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 4
2k.
Please comment on the students’ competencies in the program. Support your response using data provided
below and any other data available. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 2.
Additional comments if needed: (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 3. The program engages in ongoing systematic planning that is aligned with the University and
School/College planning, direction, and priorities.
3a.
How does your program’s strategic goal/objectives link to your School/College plan and the University’s strategic
plan? http://www.stjohns.edu/about/leadership/strategic-planning
3b.
What is the evidence of monitoring the external and internal environments, specifically what are the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the program? How were they identified? What actions have been taken
in response to these findings? What characteristics of the program suggest a competitive edge against other programs
regionally and nationally?
3c.
What is the current and future market demand for the program? Support your response using the data
provided below or any other internal or external sources to justify your response.
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 5
Fastest growing occupations and occupations having the largest numerical increase in employment by level of
education and training projected.
Change, 2010-20
Occupations having the
Change, 2010-20
Fastest Growing Occupations
largest numerical increase
Percent
Numeric
Percent
Numeric
in employment
Top Executives
5%
97,000
Top Executives
5%
97,000
Projected Changes in Related Occupations (2010 – 2020)
Changes, 2010-20
Little or no Change - Decrease 2 percent to increase 5 percent
Top Executives
Percent
Numeric
5%
97,000
*For more information please visit: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.toc.htm
Standard 3.
Additional comments if needed: (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 4. The program provides a high quality curriculum that emphasizes and assesses student learning and
engagement.
4a.
Please indicate how the program curriculum is in alignment with the following three items:
(Suggested limit 1/2 page for each of the three categories below)
1. Standards within the discipline
2. Curriculum integrity, coherence, academic internships, teaching excellence, teaching vibrancy, and study
abroad experiences.
3. The University Core competencies
4b.
The syllabi for the courses within this program incorporate the suggested elements of a syllabus – an example of
which can be found at the following St. John’s University Center for Teaching and Learning link. (Suggested limit 1/3
page) http://stjohns.campusguides.com/content.php?pid=71651&sid=984766
4c.
Describe the assessment model currently in place for the program and indicate the extent to which disciplinary
and core knowledge, competence, and values are met, as well as findings and action plans for improvement. For
reference, visit WeaveOnline – https://app.weaveonline.com//login.aspx; Digication – https://stjohns.digication.com
(Suggested limit 1/2 page)
4d.
What, if any, external validations, e.g. specialized accreditations, external awards, other validations of quality
has the program received? (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 4.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 6
STANDARD 5. The program has the faculty resources required to meet its mission and goals.
5a.
Below you will find the number of students enrolled as majors and minors in the program. Please complete the
table by adding the number of full-time faculty assigned to the program. Then calculate the student to full-time faculty
ratio.
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
# Majors/
FT Faculty
FT
PT
Total
Majors
15
38
53
Minors
FT
12
PT
33
0
Majors
& Minors
Combined
15
38
# of FTE
Students
(Majors &
Minors)
15.0
0
12.6
7
Fall 2007
Total
45
FT
7
PT
37
0
Fall 2008
Total
44
FT
12
PT
35
0
Fall 2009
Total
47
FT
16
PT
30
0
Total
46
0
53
12
33
45
7
37
44
12
35
47
16
30
46
27.6
7
12.0
0
11.0
0
23.0
0
7.0
0
12.3
3
19.3
3
12.0
0
11.6
7
23.6
7
16.0
0
10.0
0
26.0
0
# of FTE
Faculty
assigned to
the
program
.70
.57
.51
.52
.56
FTE
Student/
FTE Faculty
Ratio
39.7
7
40.5
1
37.7
3
45.3
6
46.2
0
# of Total
FTE Faculty
in the
Departmen
t
20.3
3
22.0
0
21.0
0
17.3
3
18.0
0
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 7
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
P
Total
P
Total
F
P
Total
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
Majors
MAJORS
3
3
1
Fall 2010
Total
Fall 2012
FTE MAJORS
1
3
Fall 2011
1
4
Fall 2012
P
Total
P
Total
F
P
Total
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
FTE
1
1
0.333
0.333
3
0.333
3.333
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
# of FTE faculty assigned to the
program
FTE Student/FTE Faculty Ratio
Important Notes:
FTE Students = Number of FT Students + (number of PT Students/3)
FTE Faculty = Number of FT Faculty + (number of PT Faculty/3)
This methodology is used by SJU for all external reporting.
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 8
5b.
Below you will find the credit hours the department has delivered by full-time faculty and part-time faculty
(including administrators) and the total credit hours consumed by non-majors.
Credit Hours
Taught
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
#
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
3323
65%
3153
63%
2518
48%
3650
72%
3919
73%
PT Faculty
1773
35%
1848
37%
2739
52%
1398
28%
1452
27%
Total
5096
100%
5001
100%
5257
100%
5048
100%
5371
100%
FT Faculty
% consumed
by
NonMajors
65%
Credit Hrs Taught
68%
Fall 2010
Number
71%
Fall 2011
Percent
Number
72%
Fall 2012
Percent
Number
Fall 2013
Percent
Number
Percent
F-T Faculty
3,974
78.4%
3,577
81.1%
3,255
79.4%
3,236
82.8%
P-T Faculty (inc
Admin)
1,098
21.6%
831
18.9%
846
20.6%
672
17.2%
0.0%
Total
5,072
0.0%
100%
4,408
Fall 2010
% Consumed by
Non-Majors
3,616
71.3%
100%
Fall 2011
2,982
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
67.6%
0.0%
4,101
100%
0.0%
3,908
Fall 2012
2,857
72%
69.7%
100%
Fall 2013
2,479
63.4%
Self-Study Template 9
5c.
Below you will find the number of courses the department has delivered by full-time faculty and part-time
faculty (including administrators).
Courses
Taught
Fall 2005
Fall 2006
#
%
Fall 2007
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
41
61%
35
52%
42
69%
47
71%
FT Faculty
47
70%
PT Faculty
20
30%
26
39%
32
48%
19
31%
19
29%
Total
67
100%
67
100%
67
100%
61
100%
66
100%
Courses Taught
Fall 2010
Number
Fall 2011
Percent
Number
Fall 2012
Percent
Number
Fall 2013
Percent
Number
Percent
F-T Faculty
46
78.0%
55
80.9%
50
76.9%
56
81.2%
P-T Faculty (inc
Admin)
13
22.0%
13
19.1%
15
23.1%
13
18.8%
0.0%
Total
59
100%
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
0.0%
68
100%
0.0%
65
100%
0.0%
69
100%
Self-Study Template 10
5d.
What is the representative nature of faculty in terms of demographics, tenure and diversity? (See departmental information on next
page). How well does this support the program? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
2005
FT
2006
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
Gender
Male
Female
Total
12
5
17
71%
29%
100%
8
2
10
80%
20%
100%
Ethnicity
Black
Hispanic
Asian
White
Unknown
Total
0
0
3
14
0
17
0%
0%
18%
82%
0%
100%
0
0
0
10
0
10
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
Tenure Status
Tenured
Tenure-Track
Not Applicable
Total
14
2
1
17
82%
12%
6%
100%
FT
2007
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
20
7
27
12
5
17
71%
29%
100%
13
2
15
87%
13%
100%
0
0
3
24
0
27
0
0
2
15
0
17
0%
0%
12%
88%
0%
100%
2
0
0
13
0
15
13%
0%
0%
87%
0%
100%
14
2
1
17
14
2
1
17
82%
12%
6%
100%
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
FT
2008
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
25
7
32
10
5
15
67%
33%
100%
12
6
18
67%
33%
100%
2
0
2
28
0
32
0
0
3
12
0
15
0%
0%
20%
80%
0%
100%
2
0
1
15
0
18
11%
0%
6%
83%
0%
100%
14
2
1
17
13
1
1
15
87%
7%
7%
100%
FT
2009
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
22
11
33
9
5
14
64%
36%
100%
5
5
10
50%
50%
100%
2
0
4
27
0
33
0
0
2
12
0
14
0%
0%
14%
86%
0%
100%
1
0
1
8
0
10
10%
0%
10%
80%
0%
100%
13
1
1
15
13
0
1
14
93%
0%
7%
100%
FT
PT
Total
#
%
#
%
14
10
24
9
6
15
60%
40%
100%
6
3
9
67%
33%
100%
15
9
24
1
0
3
20
0
24
1
0
2
12
0
15
0
0
1
7
1
9
0
0
1
7
1
9
0%
0%
11%
78%
11%
100%
1
0
3
19
1
24
13
1
0
14
13
1
1
15
87%
7%
7%
100%
Self-Study Template 11
13
1
1
15
2010
FT
2011
PT
#
%
#
%
10
63%
5
83%
Female
6
38%
1
17%
Total
16
Total
FT
2012
PT
#
%
#
%
10
63%
4
80%
38%
1
20%
Total
FT
2013
PT
#
%
#
%
10
63%
6
86%
38%
1
14%
Total
FT
PT
#
%
#
%
11
65%
6
86%
35%
1
14%
Total
Gender
Male
15
7
6
22
16
17%
2
1
0%
0%
0
13%
0%
2
0%
0%
0
83%
18
0%
0
6
5
14
7
6
21
16
1
7
16
7
6
23
17
1
7
17
7
24
Ethnicity
Black
1
Hispanic
Asian
American Indian/Alaskan
Native
2
White
13
6%
81%
1
5
2
6%
0%
1
0%
0%
0
20%
3
0%
0
80%
17
0%
0
13%
1
0%
13
81%
4
2
6%
0%
1
0%
0%
0
14%
3
0%
0
86%
19
0%
0
13%
1
0%
13
81%
6
2
6%
0%
1
0%
0%
0
14%
3
0%
0
86%
20
0%
0
12%
1
0%
14
82%
6
2 or More Races
Native Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander
Unknown
Total
0%
16
6
0%
22
16
5
0%
21
16
7
0%
23
17
7
24
Tenure Status
Tenured
12
75%
12
11
69%
11
11
69%
11
12
71%
12
Tenure-Track
3
19%
3
4
25%
4
4
25%
4
5
29%
5
Not Applicable
1
6%
1
1
6%
1
1
6%
1
0%
0
Total
16
16
16
16
16
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
16
17
17
Self-Study Template 12
5e.
What evidence exists that the program’s faculty have engaged in research and scholarship on teaching and/or
learning in the program’s field of study? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
5f.
What initiatives have been taken in the past five years to promote faculty development in support of the
program? (Suggested limit 1/2 page)
5g.
The table below shows the amount of external funding received by the department. If available, please provide
the dollar amount of externally funded research for full-time faculty supporting the program under review. (Program
dollar amounts are available through departmental records.)
Fiscal Year
External
$ Amount
Funding
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
Program
$ Amount Department
Fiscal Year
External
Funding
09/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
$ Amount
Program
$ Amount
Department
-
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
-
-
4,800
Self-Study Template 13
5h.
Please comment on the table below that shows trends in overall course evaluations instructional vibrancy for
your program (if available), your college and the university. (Suggested limit ½ page)
Overall Evaluation (Spring)
2011
2012
2013
Business
(Executive
Management)
(SI)
Tobin College
of Business
Total Graduate
Instructional Vibrancy (Spring)
2011
2012
2013
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.09
4.24
4.25
4.36
4.49
4.50
4.14
4.16
4.30
4.37
4.39
4.52
Note: Institutional Vibrancy is the average of the first 14 questions on the course evaluation, with questions pertaining
to course organization, communication, faculty-student interaction, and assignments/grading. All course evaluation
questions range from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
5i.
What percentage of full time faculty assigned to this program have terminal degrees or industry certifications
renewed within the past 2 years? Comment. (Suggested limit 1/3 page)
Standard 5.
Comments: Indicate to what extent the program has the faculty resources required to meet its mission
and goals. Include references from 5a – 5i. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Standard 5.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 6. The program has adequate resources to meet its goals and objectives. And, it is cost-effective.
6a.
Narrative/Supportive Technological Environment - Comment on classrooms and labs meeting industry-standards
for quality and availability of hardware, software, and peripherals; library space, holdings and services; science
laboratories, TV studios, art/computer graphic labs; etc. (Suggested limit 1 page)
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 14
6b.
Narrative/ Supportive Physical Environment - Comment on level of faculty and student satisfaction with HVAC;
faculty and student satisfaction with classroom lighting, crowdedness, and acoustics; flexible teaching environments,
and faculty offices, etc.. (Suggested limit 1 page)
6c.
To what extent has the University funded major capital projects, e.g., renovations, which are linked directly to
the program during the past five years? (Bulleted list)
6d.
If external data that describes the cost effectiveness of the program has been provided by your School/College
Dean, please comment on the program’s cost-effectiveness. (Suggested limit 1 page)
Standard 6.
Additional comments if needed. (Suggested limit 1 page)
STANDARD 7. Effective actions have been taken based on the findings of the last program review and plans have
been initiated for the future.
Comments: (Suggested limit 1page)
TCB_MGT_BUS(EXEC_MGMT)_MBA_SI
Self-Study Template 15