RCM-1 Broadening and Evolving the Ratemaking Role in Insurance Company Management

advertisement

RCM-1 Broadening and Evolving the Ratemaking

Role in Insurance Company Management

Russ Bingham

Vice President Actuarial Research

Hartford Financial Services

Ratemaking Seminar

Atlanta, GA

March 8-9, 2007

1

Outline

 The Environment

Companywide Process of Financial Discipline

Requirements for Financial Discipline

Standardizing Financial Valuation

 Modeling

Financial Model Integrity

Broadly Inclusive of All Risk and Return Variables and Metrics

 Risk-Based Pricing Principles

 Broadening the Actuarial Role – From Ratemaking to ERM

Suggestions for What Actuaries Will Need to Know / Do in the Future

 Internal versus External Perspectives

Economic and Risk-Based Orientation and Premises

2

The Environment

Companywide Process of Financial Discipline

Financial discipline is a valuation process, supported by analytical methods and models, intended to provide timely and meaningful assessments of risk / return performance and trends associated with underwriting, investment and finance operations.

Sound economic, risk-based analytics are used to support strategic and operational decision making throughout company.

3

The Environment

Requirements for Financial Discipline

Conditions needed to instill a financial discipline:

Financially astute senior leadership

A committed senior management

A group (actuarial, accounting, finance) responsible for the development of fundamental core “benchmark” principles and their application

Standardized companywide application of benchmark concepts and models

4

The Environment

Standardizing Financial Valuation

Standardized financial valuation throughout entire company

Ratemaking and product pricing

Planning

Performance monitoring

Profitability studies

Incentive compensation

Acquisition analysis

Capital attribution

Risk/return assessment

ERM

Requires Integration/Utilization of Actuarial, Accounting and

Finance Concepts

Valuation must consider Economic perspective (i.e. cash flow oriented, reflective of time value) and Risk

5

Modeling

Financial Model Integrity

“Ideal” Financial Model for Ratemaking and Other Applications

Fully integrated balance sheet, income and cash flow statements

Policy / accident period and calendar period perspectives

Nominal and economic accounting valuations

Risk and Return Incorporated / Integrated

Underwriting, Investment and Finance activities included

 Clearly and consistently stated parameter estimates

Premium, loss and expense amount

Timing of premium collection, loss and expense payment

Investment yield rates

Underwriting and investment tax rates

Specification of risks included

Amount of capital and its cost etc.

The same methodology (and preferably the same model) that is used for ratemaking should, if possible, also be used for planning, performance monitoring, financial analysis, incentive compensation, and ERM

6

Modeling

Broadly Inclusive of All Risk and Return Variables and Metrics

 Incorporate all sources of return - Revenue and Expense

 Incorporate all sources of risk that can be “distributionalized” – Loss,

Catastrophe Loss, Investment Yield, Cash Flow, etc.

 Provide all critical performance metrics – ROE, IRR, Total Risk-Adjusted

Return, Economic Value Added, Benchmark Surplus, Embedded Value,

Probability of Ruin, EPD, TVAR, RCR, etc. in addition to the more standard metrics (loss ratio, expense ratio, yield, etc.)

Don’t confuse models with metrics – Ideally a single model should include as many risk and return metrics as are needed

7

Risk-Based Pricing Principles

 Risk Pricing Objective is to insure that all operating activities (lines of business in underwriting as well as alternative investments) conform to a consistent risk / return relationship

Pricing ideally sets all operating activities’ return/risk ratio to the same benchmark standard, so that strategic opportunity decisions can be made on a level playing field

 The corporate financial goal is distributed equitably among areas through pricing and capital allocation, in relation to risk

Internal Diversification and external (e.g. ratings) factors influence this relationship

8

Broadening the Actuarial Role - From Ratemaking to ERM

Suggestions for What Actuaries Will Need to Know / Do in the Future

 Understand the nature of risk(s) and how they relate to pricing (e.g., how is risk reflected in pricing) – (also related to reserve range estimation)

 The internal and external costs faced by insurance companies (e.g., what is the cost of capital and how does it affect pricing)

 Speak the same language as management (combined ratio, ROE, etc.)

 Understand and incorporate other financial metrics (e.g., economic value added, etc.) and be an advocate for advancing the state of the art

 Understand investment and finance activities and their impact as well as underwriting oriented ones

 Be able to connect with other financial perspectives (e.g., accounting , finance)

Actuaries need to understand a broad range of financial perspectives, integrate those that are relevant into ratemaking activities, and be able to communicate with a varied audience, doing whatever is necessary to become part of the company’s financially-based decision making process

9

Internal versus External Perspectives

Economic and Risk-Based Orientation and Premises

Internal line of business decisions are made based on financials that reflect the “purest” view of financial performance possible

Accident period oriented, not Calendar period, and revised to include latest estimates of ultimate values

Economically based accounting, not Conventional (statutory or GAAP)

Forward looking (includes future cash flow expectations)

Investment risk beyond low-risk cash flow matched strategy considered as separate investment activity, not part of underwriting

Risk-adjustment (and capital attribution) based on independent view of risk (using benchmark accident year, economic, cash flow, and low risk investment structure as noted above), not the rating agency view

Consistent with fair value accounting and economic capital principles

Actual results will eventually emerge with retrospective lookback

 External total company

“constraints” must be met based on -

Calendar period (e.g. reported earnings), static where revised estimates can only be included in accounting period when revisions are made

Conventional accounting (Stat for rating agency and regulatory, GAAP for financial reporting)

Backward looking (reported historical financials)

Combined underwriting and investment results

Rating agency capital (e.g. S&P)

Reported results that are estimations, not

“actual”, since they will subsequently be revised

10

Download