Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
School Name: Lakeshore
Elementary
P
Year: 2013-2014
Current NCLB Status: Met AYP
Current ABC Status: School of Excellence
PLAN: Identify the gap and the approach
Overall SMART Goal (Two year projection): By 2014-2015 Lakeshore Elementary students in grades 3-5 will go from 93.59% proficient to 100% proficient
as measured by NC Mathematics End of Grade Test. By 2014-2015, Lakeshore Elementary will decrease the number of students identified in Tier 2 by 50%
as determined by AIMSWeb. 100% of subgroups in all grade levels will show growth as measured by CA 1- CA4.
Data Analysis. Answer the question below using any data and/or information you have about your performance.
In order to meet your Overall Goal, what is the most important area that needs improving and why? We will use an RtI Diamond model approach to
increase student engagement during core instruction and provide intervention/enrichment aligned to student needs to increase academic growth for all
subgroups.
Page 1
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
First Grade Missing Number 2013-2013
First Grade Number ID 2012-2013
Second Grade MCAP 2012-2013
First Grade Oral Counting 2012-2013
First Grade Quantity Discrimination 2012-2013
Third Grade MCAP 2012-2013
Page 2
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Fourth Grade MCAP 2012-2013
Fifth Grade MCAP 2012-2013
2012-2013 SUBGROUP DATA
Page 3
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Page 4
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
K
% of Individual Students Showing CA Growth CA1-4 2012-2013
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Grades K-5 20112012
Overall
C2
C3
C4
C2
C3
C4
C2
C3
C4
C2
C3
C4 C2
C3
C4
C2
C3
C4
98.83%
79
91
92
100
100
100
69
89
93
70
75
87
69
98
78
96
99
Page 5
65
Fifth
Grades K-5
2012-2013
Overall
Growth
CA1-CA4
94.8
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
2012-2013 EOG Results Unavailable Until October 2013
LES EOG Math Proficiency
Percent Proficient
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2006- 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 20112007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Series1 80.80% 93.40% 93.40% 89.50% 89.70% 93.59%
Year
2012-2013 Fidelity Data
Page 6
Updated 061011
De
s ig
na
te
dt
im
<6
e
stu
d
en
ce
ts
rti
fie
d
hi
sta
gh
sp
f
ly
ec
en f
ifi
cs
ga
kil
ge
ls/
d
n
ob
cs
co
jec
s
tiv
ee
vid
en
t
fe
co
e
re
db
nc
se
ac
ep
ar
k
tu
c
h
al
ba
vs
se
.p
ad
d
ro
ul
c
ed
ts
ur
w
al
ith
stu
de
nt
s
research
based
conceptual
vs.
procedural
adults with
students
feedback
highly
engaged
specific
skills/
ncscos
objective
evident
certified
staff
<6
students
Designated
time
Present out of 10
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Cycle 1:Math Pirate Fidelity Walks
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Cycle 2 Fidelity walks
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Yes
No
Page 7
Updated 061011
De
s ig
na
te
dt
im
<6
e
stu
d
en
ce
ts
rti
fie
d
hi
sta
gh
sp
ff
ly
ec
en
ifi
cs
ga
k il
ge
ls/
d
n
ob
cs
jec
co
s
tiv
ee
v id
en
t
f
e
co
e
re
db
nc
se
ac
ep
a
k
r
tu
c
h
al
b
vs
as
.p
ed
ad
ro
ul
c
ed
ts
ur
w
al
ith
stu
de
nt
s
De
s ig
na
te
dt
im
<6
e
stu
d
en
ce
ts
rti
fie
d
hi
sta
gh
sp
f
ly
ec
en f
ifi
cs
ga
k il
ge
ls/
d
n
ob
cs
co
jec
s
tiv
ee
vid
en
t
fe
co
e
re
db
nc
se
ac
ep
ar
k
tu
c
h
al
ba
vs
se
.p
ad
d
ro
ul
c
ed
ts
ur
w
al
ith
stu
de
nt
s
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Fidelity Walks Cycle 3
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Yes
No
Cycle 4 Pirate Fidelity Walks
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
yes
no
Page 8
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
yes
no
De
s ig
na
te
d
< 6 t ime
stu
de
ce
nt
rti
s
fie
d
hi
sta
sp
gh
ff
ec
ly
ifi
c s eng
ag
k il
ed
ls/
nc
ob
sc
jec
os
tiv
ee
vid
en
t
f
e
co
ed
re
nc
ba
se
ep
ck
ar
tu
c
h
al
b
vs
as
.p
ed
ad
r
oc
ul
ed
ts
w
ur
ith
al
stu
de
nt
s
Present out of 4
Cycle 5 Fidelity Data
Cycle 2 Vmath Fidelity Walks
N/A
Unknown
1 rarely
2 sometimes
3 often
4 always
Page 9
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Cycle 3 Vmath Fidelity Walks
N/A
Unknown
1 rarely
2 sometimes
3 often
4 always
Vmath Fidelity Data
Possible Look Fors
N/A
Unknown
1 rarely
2 sometimes
3 often
4 always
Cycle 2
360
30
34
2
8
59
227
%
8.3
9.4
0.5
2.2
16.3
63
Cycle 3
210
10
6
8
3
16
145
%
2.7
2.8
3.8
0.6
7.61
78.6
Data Analysis. Answer the data analysis questions.
1. What is contributing to your success in this
2. What opportunities for improvement do you
area and how do you know?
notice?
Fourth Grade Math 80% green Spring, First grade missing
number, quantity discrimination, number ID all at 90% or
higher for spring
From CA1-CA4
K- all subgroups showed growth except Asian
1st All subgroup but male showed growth
OFI’S- Fifth grade Math and Third Grade Math below 80%
spring
From CA 1-CA4
K- Asian decreased
1- Male maintained
2- Asian maintained and SWD decreased
3- AIG decreased, female and ED maintained
Page 10
3. What seems to be the root cause of the
problem and how do you know?
Increase engagement of students in core instruction
to reduce students needing intervention.
AIMS will continue to be used in all grades except
kinder. Add Moving with Math as available resource
for math intervention and core instruction-will need
to be monitored for fidelity. Monitor interventions
with fidelity through frequent progress
monitoring…if not working must move to something
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
2nd All subgroups showed growth except Asian and SWD
3rd Asian and white subgroup increased more than 10
points
4- Asian and LEP showed least amount of growth
5- Black decreased and mixed maintained
Fidelity data shows conceptual vs. procedural still has some
confusion.
new. Be creative with scheduling so that students
are able to receive interventions that they need. Use
AIMS data to support enrichment as well for
students needing to move beyond. Provide more
training on conceptual vs. procedural.
4th all subgroups showed growth
5th All subgroup showed growth except for black and
mixed
Fidelity data is strong with most walks at 100%, VMATH
intervention fidelity data showed improvement over
time.
Target SMART Goal (One year projection): By 2013-2014 Lakeshore Elementary Students in grades 3-5 will go from 93.59% proficient to 96.8 %
proficient as measured by the NC Mathematics End of Grade Test. By 2013-2014, the percent of students showing growth in grades K-5 will increase
from 94.8% to 100% as measured by CA. By 2013-2014, 100% of students identified above grade level in AimsWeb will show growth. By 2013-2014 100%
of subgroups will show a minimum of 5 point growth from CA 1- CA 4.
What will you do during cycle 1 to address the root cause identified in #3(Identify key approach or strategy you will implement during cycle 1 to move
toward achieving your target goal.)?
Implement RtI Diamond Model –with clearly defined core focused on increased student engagement and is supported by 8 mathematical practices with a
clearly defined tier II that incorporates a targeted intervention block and enrichment block.
D
Step #
DO: Develop and Implement Deployment Plan
Cycle 1 List the specific steps your team will
complete during the first cycle.
Person(s) responsible for Measure/Indicator
completion of the step.
(How will you know if the
step is completed
correctly?)
Page 11
Start Date
End Date
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Maintain a Core Team for RtI pilot training.
Hinson
Goal team mtg.
Continue training of Common Core, 8
Hinson/Semanko
LES Core Chart
mathematical practices and math foundations,
Cain workshop
Continue to implement 8 mathematical
Hinson/Semanko
PLC’s
practices and conceptual thinking during core
instruction
Ongoing RtI coaching from core team (RtI pilot)
RtI trainers
Staff Meeting
Identify students needing tier 2 intervention and RtI Coordinator
Tracking Sheet
begin/continue tier 2 paperwork, implement
Pirate Time
Continue to Train, and implement
Hinson
Training agenda
intervention/enrichment programs for math
Pirate Time. VMath and Extensions Moving with
Math
Schedule 4 data days for the year, 1 each
Hinson
Data Day Agendas
quarter to review data and determine next
steps.
Continue implementation of core instruction
Semanko
Lesson Plans
that incorporates 8 mathematical practices and
conceptual thinking
Hinson
11
Purchase Total Participation Technique Book for
all teachers (TPT)
Continue training on TPT strategies to
incorporate TPT strategies in core
Ongoing support through PLC’s and ERD for the
implementation of RtI.
Teachers review Tiered Paperwork monthly
12
District differentiation specialist and
Hinson, Shipley, Beane
9
10
6/4/13
8/26/13
6/4/13
6/10/14
8/26/13
6/10/14
8/26/13
8/26/13
6/10/14
10/1/13
6/12/13
6/10/14
6/13/13
9/30/13
8/25/13
6/10/14
Purchase Invoice
8/25/13
Hinson/Semanko/Beane, Lesson plans
Compass Team
Semanko
Agenda/Minutes
8/26/13
6/7/14
8/25/13
6/10/14
RtI Coordinator
8/24/13
8/24/14
8/26/13
6/10/14
Page 12
Revised Tiered Paperwork
summary sheets
Completed schedule
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
intervention specialist works with enrichment
block teachers through ERD support.
9/30/13
13
Update and Implement fidelity tool for
Hinson
Fidelity Data
intervention and enrichment block.
9/1/13
14
Utilize Vmath coach for training on fidelity tool.
Vmath coach
Meeting agenda
10/17/13
15
Progress Monitor Tiered Paperwork students
Classroom teacher
Assessment results
8/26/13
16
Administer/Analyze AIMS WEB Screening
Hinson
AIMS WEB results/report
beginning-year, mid-year, end-year
8/26/13
17
Administer CA according to school testing
Teachers
Marathon Data
schedule (4 times a year)
18
Analyze CA data to determine strength of core
Teachers
% of students at each tier 8/26/13
and students identified in each tier beginning,
data
middle, and end of year.
8/26/13
19
Analyze fidelity data and subgroup data after
King/Jones/ Goal Team
SIP plan
each CA
Implementation Plan Quality Check:
What resources/budget needs do you have for the first cycle?
 $800 for Cain workshop
 Intervention program/enrichment program training, consumable workbooks for intervention groups, (ie Vmath)
 RtI tier II strategy resources available within the school and people to lead groups
 Cardstock for games
 Black and color ink for printers
 Envelopes for games
 Glues sticks, brads for games
 TPT book for each teacher
6/10/14
6/10/14
6/10/14
6/10/14
6/10/14
6/10/14
6/10/14
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
 Instructional Money
 I3 Grant Money
If funding is not available, identify the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
Page 13
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
See if funds can be provided by PTO
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 1 to support the staff in implementing the approach?
 RtI Pilot-District Support
 Support Training for Common Core and the 8 mathematical practices
 CAIN workshop for all staff conceptual vs. procedural
 TPT training for all staff (including assistants)
Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the first cycle approach by answering the following questions:
A. List the information or measures the team B. List the information or measures the team will use to C. List the information or measures the
will use to determine if the approach was determine if the approach wasn’t implemented
team will use to determine what worked
implemented/completed? (Completion
correctly? (Fidelity of implementation data.)
and what didn’t work? (Impact data)
Data)
Fidelity tool for intervention/enrichment block
CA, EOG Data, AIMS web Data, CA
Progress Monitoring Data
subgroup data
Tiered Paperwork summary sheets
S
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
At the end of cycle 1, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
1. What worked and how do you
2. What didn’t work and how do you know?
3. Do you need any additional assistance as you look at you
know?
results and start planning for Cycle 2? ___Yes ___No
Reflect on the answers in box 1 and 2 above for cycle 1 and check which option best describes what you will do in your plan for cycle 2 (double click the
box and select “check” to check the box)?
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target
Target goal not met so we will continue current plan. We will make improvements
goal.
to the plan based on what didn’t work as identified in #2 above.
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will
Target goal not met and information indicates that we need to abandon the current
continue current plan and repeat it for the next cycle.
plan and identify a new approach.
Page 14
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
A
Act – Revise or continue with implementation plan based on data analysis.
4. What is your focus for cycle 2 (Identify key approach or strategy)? If you are continuing with the approach from cycle 1, restate it here. If you are
changing your approach for cycle 2, state it here.
Step #
Cycle 2 List the specific steps your team will Person(s) responsible for
Measure/Indicator
Start Date End Date
complete during the second cycle.
completion of the step.
(How will you know if the
step is completed
correctly?)
Implementation Plan Quality Check:
What resources/budget needs do you have for cycle 2?
If you identified budget needs, what budget code will you use to meet the budget needs for this cycle?
If funding is not available, list the steps from the implementation plan that will address the funding gap.
What professional development, if any, will be offered in cycle 2 to support the staff in implementing the approach?
Page 15
Updated 061011
Iredell-Statesville Schools
School Improvement Plan
A Continuous Improvement Strategic Plan
Determine the measures/data that will be used to determine the effectiveness of the Cycle 2 approach by answering the following questions
A. List the information or measures the team will
B. List the information or measures the team will use
C. List the information or measures the
use to determine if the approach was
to determine if the approach wasn’t implemented
team will use to determine what worked
implemented/completed? (Completion Data)
correctly? (Fidelity of implementation.)
and what didn’t work? (Impact Data)
S
Study – Analysis of data after implementing an approach
At the end of cycle 2, answer the following questions based on the data collected from the identified measures in boxes A, B, and C above:
1. What worked and how do you know?
2. What didn’t work and how do you know?
3. Do you need any additional assistance as
you look at your results and start planning for
Cycle 2? ___Yes ___No
From whom do you need assistance?
Reflect on the data analysis for the year so far and check the option below that best describes your direction for the 2012-13 SIP.
A
Act – Continue with the Target Goal or revise the Target Goal for next year.
Overall goal has been met and School Improvement Plan focus will change for next year.
Or…
Target goal has been met and is changed to a new target goal.
Target goal not met but current plan is effective so we will continue current plan and repeat it for the 2014-2015 SIP to take our work to sustaining..
.Target goal not met, so we will continue current plan for 2014-2015. We will make improvements to the plan based on what didn’t work through this
year.
Page 16
Updated 061011