Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Association, Reaction and Interpretation How is this perspective different? • Both the functionalist and conflict perspective portrays deviance as a product of society • Symbolic Interactionists see deviance as a process of interaction between supposed deviants and the rest of society Differential Association Theory • Edwin Sutherland- Deviance is learned through interactions with other people. ▫ Learn how to perform these acts but also how to define these actions ▫ Someone is likely to become deviant if engaged in differential association- process of acquiring, through interactions with others an “excess of definitions favorable to violation of law over definitions unfavorable to violation of law” Differential Association- Example • Father tells child “it is ok to steal when you’re poor” ▫ Giving a prodeviant definition • Father tells child “it is wrong to steal” ▫ Giving an antideviant definition • If the child picks up more prodeviant definitions, they are likely to become deviant The importance of social interaction • This is the source of the definitions of deviance • Deviance will arise if interactions with those who define deviant behavior positively outweigh interactions with those who define it negatively How Sutherland explains crimes: • Theory explains various forms of deviance, including white collar crime (tax evasion, embezzlement, and price fixing) • Deviant acts were shown to result from some association with groups that viewed the wrongdoings acceptable ▫ Most people however cannot identify the persons from whom they learned prodeviant or antideviant defintions. Labeling Theory • Concentrates on the societal reaction to rule violation and the impact of this reaction on the rule violator • Society reacts to a rule-breaking act by labeling it as deviant ▫ Deviance is then not something a person does but a label imposed on that behavior • According to Howard Becker, the deviant is one to whom that label has successfully been applied The deviant label • The label itself has serious negative consequences for the individual beyond any immediate punishment • Once a person has been labeled a delinquent, he/she may be stuck with that label for life and may be rejected and isolated as a result ▫ Finding a job and making friends may be difficult ▫ Person may come to accept the label and commit more deviant acts Labeling explanations • Frank Tannenbaum: Children may break windows, annoy people, steal, and play hooky and innocently consider these activities just a way of having fun • Edwin Lemert: coined the term primary deviance- refers to these violations of norms that a person commits for the first time and without considering then deviant The influence of labels • Suppose parents, teachers, and police consider a child’s prank as a sign of delinquency ▫ May dramatize it and scold the child ▫ May go further, hauling the child into juvenile detention and labeling the child as bad, a delinquent. Child may develop a bad self-image and try to live up to this image and become more deviant • Lemert used the term secondary deviance to refer to such repeated norm violations Phenomenological Theory • To really understand deviance, phenomenologists say we must study people’s subjective interpretations of their own deviant experiences • Deviants tend to see themselves and their deviance in some positive way and they behave accordingly Phenomenological theory example: Agnes • Study done by Harold Garfinkel • Agnes was a hermaphrodite (person with both male and female sex organs) • Raised a boy until high school, developed an attractive female figure, dropped out of school, left home and tried to make a new life as a woman ▫ A year later, she went to UCLA medical center to request a sex-change operation Agnes • Garfinkel found that Agnes saw herself as a normal woman and that she had a physical defect and like any other person w/ a deformity, she wanted it removed • Her self-concept as a normal woman caused her to make sure that others wouldn’t suspect her of having the male organ-never undressed in her female roommate’s presence So how does this relate???? • Jack Katz, in an analysis of murderers, robbers and other criminals found a similarly positive self-perception that conflicts with society’s negative view of the deviant • Murderers tend to see themselves as morally superior to their victims ▫ If the victim humiliated the murderer, killing them was justifiable way of defending their identity, dignity or respectability How is this theory useful? • Useful for understanding the subjective world of deviants • However, its doubtful that deviants have positive views of themselves and their deviance