2013-2014 Rolling Ridge Elementary School
advertisement
Rolling Ridge Elementary School 2013-2014 PALS Scores: 2012-2013 PALS Met Benchmark # Below Benchmark # 77 73 72 59 48 21 8 6 FALL SPRING 1 11 13 18 8 FALL SPRING 2 11 FALL 3 8 FALL SPRING KG DRA Scores – Fall to Spring 2012-2013 Met Below Total Tested Met Benchmark Below Benchmark # Benchmark # % Benchmark # % KG 01 02 03 04 05 FALL SPRING 83 60 72% 23 28% FALL 78 42 54% 36 46% SPRING 79 67 85% 12 15% FALL 78 42 54% 36 46% SPRING 74 52 70% 22 30% 100 65 65% 35 35% SPRING 63 33 52% 30 48% FALL 85 44 52% 41 48% SPRING 64 31 48% 33 52% FALL 79 63 80% 16 20% SPRING 21 11 52% 10 48% FALL DRA Scores 2012-2013 DRA 2013 Met Benchmark # 67 Below Benchmark # 65 60 63 52 42 36 44 41 42 36 35 23 33 30 3133 22 16 KG 1 2 3 4 SPRING 1110 FALL SPRING FALL SPRING FALL SPRING FALL SPRING FALL FALL SPRING 12 5 Congratulations!! • All AMOs were met in Reading and Math • Met full accreditation in the state of Virginia • Let’s look a little more closely at the numbers Math Performance – All Students Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 591 791 74.7% 64% 61% Current 213 276 77.2% 64% 61% Previous 153 255 60.0% All Students AMO Previous Current RRD Score 60% 64% 77% 3 year 64% 75% 3 Proficiency Gap Groups Students with Disabilities English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged Black students, not of Hispanic Origin* Hispanic students, of one or more races* *to include students with disabilities, English language learners, and Economically disadvantaged students Math Performance – Gap Group 1 Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 412 586 70% 52% 47% Current 152 209 73% 52% Previous 102 189 54% Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch AMO Previous RRD Score 54% Current 52% 3 year 52% 73% 70% Math Performance – Gap Group 2 Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 412 586 74% 51% 45% Current 152 209 79% 51% Previous 102 189 58% Gap Group 2 = Black Students AMO RRD Score Previous 58% Current 51% 3 year 51% 79% 74% Math – Gap Group 3 (Hispanic) Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 Year 274 413 66% 56% Current 19 24 70% 56% Previous 69 138 50% Gap Group 3 AMO Previous RRD Score 50% Current 56% 3 Year 56% 70% 66% • Students with disabilities • English language learners • Economically disadvantaged students • White students • Asian students Math – Economically Disadvantaged Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 329 481 68% 52% Current 124 177 70% 52% Previous 81 157 52% Economically Disadvantaged AMO Previous RRD Score 52% Current 52% 3 year 52% 70% 68% Math – Limited English Proficient Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 273 410 67% 46% Current 95 142 67% 46% Previous 62 129 48% Limited English Proficient AMO Previous RRD Score 48% Current 46% 3 year 46% 67% 67% Math – Students with Disabilities Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 79 126 63% 41% Current 39 51 76% 41% Previous 16 41 39% Students with Disabilities AMO Previous RRD Score 39% Current 41% 3 year 41% 76% 63% How do we compare to other schools in reading? 100 90 80 70 60 50 East Cent 1 40 Title 1 30 East 3 20 10 0 Leesburg 4 RRD English Scores dropped on average 20% or more across the state of VA. • New SOL test – much more rigorous assessment • Our drops were far less than 20% English Performance – All Students Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 583 788 74% 66% 85% Current 184 275 67% 66% Previous 200 258 78% -19% All Students AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 78% 66% 67% - 12% 66% 74% English Performance – Gap Group 1 Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 386 578 67% 52% Current 126 207 61% 52% Previous 131 188 70% Previous AMO 76% -24% Gap Group 1 = SPED + ELL + F/R Lunch AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 70% 52% 52% 61% - 9% 67% English Performance – Gap Group 2 Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 52 72 68% 49% Current 16 24 67% 49% Previous 19 26 73% Previous AMO -27% 76% Gap Group 2 = Black Students AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 73% 49% 49% 67% 68% - 6% English Performance – Gap Group 3 Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO 3 year 272 410 66% 53% Current 91 151 60% 53% Previous 96 138 70% Previous AMO 80% -27% Gap Group 3 = Hispanic Students AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 70% 53% 53% 60% - 10% 66% English Performance – Asian Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 86 104 83% 80% 92% Current 21 29 72% 80% Previous 32 36 89% -8% Asian Students AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 89% 72% 80% - 17% 80% 83% English – Economically Disadvantaged Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 314 475 66% 52% 76% Current 109 176 62% 52% Previous 104 154 68% -24% Economically Disadvantaged Students AMO RRD Score Previous Current 3 year 68% 52% 52% 62% 66% - 6% English Performance – Students w/ Disabilities Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 65 126 52% 30% 59% Current 28 50 56% 30% Previous 21 42 50% -29% Students with Disabilities AMO RRD Score Previous 50% Current 30% 3 year 30% - 6% 56% 52% English Performance – White Students Data Source Students Counted Total Students RRD Score AMO Previous AMO 3 year 139 154 90% 74% 90% Current 43 51 84% 74% Previous 43 47 91% -16% White Students AMO RRD Score Previous 91% Current 74% 3 year 74% 84% 90% - 7% How do we compare to other schools in reading? 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 East Cent 1 Title 1 East 3 Leesburg 4 RRD So how did we do it? 1. Successful identification of struggling students based on assessments given 2. Successful implementation of a tiered intervention program to provide reteaching for those who need it 3. Successful monitoring of the interventions given Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 * Please refer to your handout What does this look like? Let’s take a look at the Rolling Ridge Elementary School Improvement Plan • • • • TA01 Identification TA02 Intervention TA03 Monitoring IE08 Principal’s time – 50% of time directly related to instruction • IF08 Staff development based on identified areas of relative deficit What are we doing to enrich? • What are the other students doing while their classmates receive tier 2 and/or tier 3 services? – Read (Independently / Reader’s Theatre) – Write – iReady – individualized remediation and enrichment program – Enrichment groups (provided by the SEARCH and FLES teacher) – Reading buddy for younger students – TBD – technology club (select students will create iMovies and multimedia presentations) We need your help!! • Read with your child every day OR make sure that your child reads on his/her own • Check your child’s homework planner daily!! • If you have computer access, encourage your child to go practice on reflex math or iReady instead of watching TV or play Xbox • Practice math facts with your child (in the car is the best place. . . They are a captive audience) • Ask you child about their day. . . Our teachers post and review objectives every day, ask them to tell you what the objective for their math lesson was!) • Encourage your child, celebrate their successes!! Questions?
