Undulator Specifications Undulator Overview FEL Performance Assessment Recent Undulator Parameter Changes

advertisement
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
November 14, 2003
Undulator Overview
FEL Performance Assessment
Recent Undulator Parameter Changes
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Linac Coherent Light Source
Near Hall
Undulator
Far Hall
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Undulator Schematic (Regular Section)
3,410
406
863 mm
UNDULATOR
11,905 mm
Horizontal Steering Coil
Total Length
130,092 mm
Vertical Steering Coil
Beam Position Monitor
X-Ray Diagnostics
Quadrupoles
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
SASE FELs
SASE FEL theory well developed
and verified by simulations
FEL radiation starts from noise in
spontaneous radiation
Saturation
Exponential
Gain Regime
Undulator Regime
Transverse radiation electric field
modulates the energy and
bunches the electrons within an
optical wavelength
1 % of X-Ray Pulse
Exponential build-up of radiation
Electron Bunch
along undulator length
Micro-Bunching
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Expected Performance
Start-To-End Simulations:
Parmela
Elegant
Genesis / Ginger
space-charge
compression, wakes, CSR, …
SASE FEL with wakes
Low charge cases are modeled in PARMELA
after the GTF results and then imported into
ELEGANT/GENESIS for the transport
through the LCLS beam line.
The simulations includes:
Space charge in the gun
Emittance compensation
Wakefield and CSR effects
Optimized beam transport (Jitter)
Spontaneous Undulator Radiation
All cases reach saturation
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Workshop on Start-To-End Simulations
Beam Dynamics Mini
Workshop
Future Light Sources
Start-To-End Simulations for SASE FELs (S2E 2003)
Chaired by
John Galayda (SLAC) and Joerg Rossbach (DESY)
Dates
August 18 – 22, 2003
Location
DESY-Zeuthen, Berlin, Germany
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Comparison of GINGER/GENESIS results
for 1-nC LCLS “0-order” Case
Observations:
• GENESIS shows very slightly longer gain
length, later saturation but higher power
• GINGER shows stronger post-saturation
power oscillation (more deeply trapped
particles?)
• Method for choosing best K was slightly
different for both codes
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
GINGER/GENESIS results for “0-order”
200-pC case
Observations:
• Again, GENESIS shows slightly longer gain
length, 10-m later saturation but 15%
higher power
• Again, GINGER shows deeper postsaturation power oscillation
• Little sensitivity (2 m, 7%) in GINGER
results to 8X particle number increase
• Possible reasons for differences:
 bugs
 slight differences in initial e-beam
properties (e.g. mismatch)
 grid effects (e.g. outer boundary)
 ???
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
1-nC LCLS: “1st-order” envelope reconstruction: max P(z) vs. slice time
100 GW
100 GW
GINGER
GENESIS
Some quick observations:
• Power suppressed in regions with high energy spread [-90:-70 fs]
• GENESIS shows ~2-3X greater power than GINGER for no-wake cases
• For runs including wake fields, GINGER shows somewhat more peak power
for the main body (but more localized in time)
• Beam centroid wander may be important – better modeled by GENESIS
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Tolerance Analysis: RON
R. Dejus, N. Vinokurov
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Linac Coherent Light Source
Undulator Performance Requirements (as of May 2003)
3.6350
Parameter
Symbol
Target
(Nom.)
Effective Undulator Parameter
K
3.711
Average Gap Height
g
6.0
mm
+0.006
Average Period Length
lu
30.00
mm
±0.03
Wiggle Plane
Units
6.5
Tolerance
(critical)
±0.015 %
horizontal
—
RMS Trajectory Straightness Tolerance
Dx
2
mm
—
RMS Segment Phase Shake Tolerance
Df
10
degrees
—
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Trajectory Straightness Requirement
Preserve transverse overlap between beam and
radiation
=> Tolerance for betatron amplitude < 8 mm (beam radius dep.)
Avoid longitudinal phase shake between beam and
radiation
=> Tolerance for rms phase shake 10 degrees per module
=> Equivalent tolerance for rms electron beam straightness 2 mm
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Workshop on Undulator Parameters
LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop
Chaired by
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn (SLAC)
Dates
November 24, 2003
Location
APS, Argonne, USA
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Workshop Focus
Set Undulator Period
Reduction of maximum available linac energy
Undulator gap height increase
Longer break distances
Weaker FODO lattice
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Adjusting Estimate of On-Axis Undulator Field
Halbach formula for hybrid undulator is used to
estimate relation between gap/period and on-axis field
Bae
 gap 
gap
b
 c

period  period 
2
a  3.44 T
b  5.08
c  1.54
period  3 cm

 B  1.325 T
gap  6.00 mm 
Measured prototype field 5.3% larger than estimated
a  3.62 T
b  5.08
c  1.54
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
period  3 cm

 B  1.325 T
gap  6.35 mm 
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Undulator Period
Present undulator period length of 3 cm is near
optimum for shortest gain length
Change of undulator period length would require more
man-power and time than available before next review
Undulator period length will be kept at
lu = 3.0 cm
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Maximum Available Linac Energy
14.35 GeV has been nominal energy to reach 1.5 Å
Loss of available linac energy due to
Reduction of available linac sections (incl. Injector relocation)
Off-crest acceleration
New maximum energy set to 14.1 GeV to restore
operational overhead
Requires change in K value
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Undulator Gap Selection
Undulator gap height changes still possible
Present gap height: 6 mm
Gap height corrected for measured field: 6.35 mm
Parameter correction for reduced maximum energy
gap  6.5 mm
Bmax  1.298 T
K  3.6350
More Room for
Vacuum Chamber
E  14.09 GeV lr  1.5 Å
E  4.46 GeV lr  15.0 Å
New Parameters
Larger gap gives access to short wavelength 1.0 Å
gap  8.2 mm
Bmax  1.013 T
K  2.838
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
E  14.03 GeV lr  1.0 Å
E  11.46 GeV lr  1.5 Å
E  3.62 GeV lr  15.0 Å
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Undulator Large Gap / Low K Proposal
Based on
Chosen
Parameters
Proposed
Undulator
Length
Safety
Overhead
Emittance
Goal
Emittance
Achieved
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
New Break Lengths
Separations between undulator modules (breaks) designed to
produce slippage by integer number of optical wavelength.
Break increments for adding slippage of 1 optical wavelength is
DLB=lu (1+K2/2).
DLB=23.7 cm (old); 22.8 cm (new)
Present design uses break pattern 1-1-2 which corresponds to the
lengths sequence
18.7 cm – 18.7 cm – 42.1 cm
18.7 cm gives not enough space for quads, BPMs, etc.
Length needed > 30 cm
42.1 cm gives not enough space for x-ray diagnostics
Length needed > 70 cm
New break pattern 2-2-4 corresponding to length
sequence 40.6 cm – 40.6 cm – 86.3 cm
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Weaker FODO Lattice
FODO Lattice had been designed for
<bx,y>=18 m at 1.5 Å
Required gradient of 106-107 T/m for 5 cm long quads
New gradient set to 60 T/m to
Increase Saturation Power
Relax Beam-Based Alignment Tolerances
Saturation length only slightly increased
Average beta function at 1.5 Å is now
<bx,y>=30 m
Focusing and defocusing magnets will be identical
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Optimum b-Function at Short Wavelength
14.1 GeV
Optimum Beta-Function
New Beta-Function
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Operating Points for 1 nC Bunch Charge (Old)
LCLS Operating Point at 1.5 Å
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
LCLS Operating Point at 15 Å
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Operating Points for 1 nC Bunch Charge (New)
Operating Point
Operating Point
LCLS Operating Point at 1.5 Å
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
LCLS Operating Points for 1 nC Bunch Charge (New)
Operating Point
Operating Point
LCLS Operating Point at 15 Å
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Beam Based Alignment Tolerances (Paul Emma)
description
value
unit
BPM rms resolution
1
mm
BPM offsets (uncorrelated)
50
mm 100
BPM offsets (correlated)
3 00
mm
rms BPM ‘random-walk’ over length of undulator
BPM mean calibration error
10
%
mean calibration error of all BPMs
BPM rms calibration spread
3
%
rms calibration error spread over BPMs
quad. offsets (uncorrelated)
50
mm 100
quad. offsets (correlated)
3 00
mm
rms quad ‘random-walk’ over length of undulator
quad. mean gradient error
0.3
%
mean gradient error of all quadrupoles
quad rms gradient error spread
0.3
%
rms gradient error spread over quadrupoles
undulator rms pole field errors
0.1
0.04
%
rms pole field errors spread
mover mean calibration error
5
%
mean calibration error of all magnet movers
mover rms calibration spread
3
%
rms calibration error spread over magnet movers
mover reproducibility (backlash)
01
mm
incoming mean trajectory error
10

initial constant launch error in units of rms beam size
incoming rms trajectory jitter
0-0.1

initial variable launch error in units of rms beam size
rms energy measurement error
2
%
uncertainty in knowledge of beam energy
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
comments
2
4
net resolution  not necessarily single pulse
rms BPM-to-BPM survey and electrical offsets
rms quad-to-quad survey errors
backlash  mover attains setting to within 1 mm
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Summary of Nominal Undulator Design Changes
Undulator Type
Magnet Material
Wiggle Plane
Gap
Period Length
Peak On-Axis Field
K
OLD
planar hybrid
NdFeB
horizontal
6
3.0
1.325
3.711
NEW
planar hybrid
NdFeB
horizontal
6.5
3.0
1.298
2.635
Module Length
Number of Modules
Undulator Magnet Length
3.41
33
112.5
3.41
33
112.5
m
Break Length
Total Device Length
18.7-18.7-42.1
121.8
40.6-40.6-86.3
130.2
cm
m
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
mm
cm
T
m
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Summary of Nominal Focusing Lattice Changes
Lattice Type
Magnet Type
Nominal Magnet Length
QF Gradient
QD Gradient
Average b Function at 1.5 Å
Lowest Usable Energy
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
OLD
NEW
FODO
permanent
5
107
-106
18.0
3.17
FODO
permanent
5
60
-60
30
1.84
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
cm
T/m
T/m
m
GeV
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Summary of Electron Beam Parameters
At 1.5 Å
OLD
NEW
Electron Beam Energy
g
<b>
rms beam radius
14.35
28082
18.0
36
14.09
27580
30.0
35
At 15 Å
OLD
NEW
Electron Beam Energy
g
<b>
rms beam radius
4.45
8880
7.3
35
4.46
8722
8.9
34
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
GeV
m
mm
GeV
m
mm
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Conclusions
Requirements for LCLS undulator are well established
LCLS undulator performance requirements are well understood
Risks have been assessed and undulator specifications address the risk
New parameter values have been chosen
Increase in undulator gap,
reduction in maximum electron beam energy,
longer break length, and
reduced quadrupole gradients
Benefits are
more room for vacuum chamber
more energy safety margin
more space for diagnostics components between undulator modules
increase of accessible wavelength range
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Linac Coherent Light Source
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
End of Presentation
Undulator Parameter Workshop, November 14, 2003
Undulator Specifications
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL
Nuhn@slac.stanford.edu
Download