LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments
(LUSI)
Project Management Control System
Felix B. Fernandez – Project Controls
August, 2008
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 1
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS
Topics:
System Overview
PMCS Development Process
PMCS Current Status
Summary and Questions
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 2
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
The LUSI Project Management Control System:
Complies with DOE Order 413.3A
Complies with the 32 criteria from ANSI/EIA-748-A
Complies with the LUSI Project Execution Plan
Modeled after the LCLS Project PMCS
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 3
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 4
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
SLAC/LCLS
PMCS
Procedures
SLAC
Accounting
System
Schedule
Baseline
Schedule
Reports
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 5
Analysis
Tool
“Hammer”
Cost
Reports
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
LUSI PMCS is defined and controlled by LCLS Procedures:
Earned Value Management System Description – LCLS 1.1-015
CA and WP Planning Procedure – LCLS 1.1-018
Change Control Procedure – LCLS 1.1-019
Project Schedule Procedure – LCLS 1.1-020
Cost Estimating Procedure – LCLS 1.1-021
Monthly Status and Reporting Procedure – LCLS 1.1-022
Subcontract Management Procedure – LCLS 1.1-023
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 6
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
Using Primavera (P3) as the Scheduling tool
Have established a Project group with supporting
project files maintained independently:
LUSI Project Group
Project Management (SLAC)
XPP Instrument (SLAC)
CXI Instrument (SLAC)
XCS Instrument (SLAC)
Diagnostics and Common Optics (SLAC)
Controls and Data Acquisition (SLAC)
XPP and XCS Detector Systems (BNL)
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 7
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
Using Cobra as the Budgeting tool
Have created a Cobra project file for MIE funded
effort.
The project also uses a web based tool called the
“PMCS Hammer” that integrates Primavera, Cobra
and Accounting data.
The “PMCS Hammer” is updated monthly following
the month end cycle and provides team members a
way of accessing/analyzing their data and writing their
VARs.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 8
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 9
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Overview
Jeff Chan
LCLS
Project Office
Conv Facilities
Controls
Linac
XE
Controls
XTOD
Controls
Undulator
Installation
Commisioning
Database
LUSI
Project Office
XPP
CXI
XCS
DCO
Controls
BNL
Database
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 10
Craig Brackett Jay Doubrava
Pat Dunn
Hok Leung
Cathy Lavelle
X
X
x
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
x
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 11
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Define Schedule and Budget assumptions
Finalize the WBS, WBS Dictionary
Finalize a Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
Finalize the Milestone Hierarchy and Dictionary
Finalize the set of SLAC/BNL Resources and Rates
Finalize the resource loaded Integrated Master Schedule
Use the Schedule baseline to create a Budget baseline
Establish a prelim Performance Measurement Baseline
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 12
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Schedule Assumptions
Within the funding limitations, get to an Early Science capability
with the Instruments as early as possible.
Establish priority order of Instruments as XPP, CXI and XCS.
Establish multiple CD-4 milestones, one for each Instrument.
Components not required for Early Science operations can be
installed for final CD-4 milestone.
Establish multiple CD-3 milestones to allow procurement of
components for each Instrument as early as possible.
Establish a complete performance measurement baseline for all
project equipment and conduct one CD-2.
Assume a Long Lead Authorization approval for Key critical
components following CD-2 and prior to CD-3.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 13
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Budget Assumptions
Plan for an MIE funding profile of:
Plan for a Continuing Resolution for the first half of FY2009
(approx. $500k/month).
The balance of FY2009 funding will be available in the third
quarter($12M).
Use Resources and Rates (Direct/Indirect) provided by SLAC
and BNL.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 14
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Project WBS and WBS Dictionary
The Work Breakdown Structure has been placed under change
control
PM-391-000-96
The WBS Dictionary has been updated to reflect the latest
structure and has been placed under change control
PM-391-001-12
The Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM) has been
developed that identifies Control Accounts and CA Managers
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 15
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Control Account Managers
T. Fornek
- WBS 1.1 Project Management
J. Langton
- WBS 1.2 XPP Instrument *
P. Montanez
- WBS 1.3 CXI Instrument
E. Bong
- WBS 1.4 XCS Instrument *
E. Ortiz
- WBS 1.5 Diagnostics & Common Optics
G. Haller
- WBS 1.6 Controls & Data Acquisition
Niels van Bakel
- WBS 1.2.03 & 1.4.03 BNL Detectors
* Except for BNL Detector effort
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 16
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Project Milestone Hierarchy and Dictionary
The Milestone Hierarchy has been created and defines the
relationship between the levels of milestones.
Six levels of milestones have been identified
Level 1 & 2 - DOE
Level 3 – Project
Level 4 – Instruments/Systems
Level 5 – Interface / Handoff
Level 6 – Commitments / Awards
The Milestone Dictionary has been developed to assure a
thorough understanding of agreements
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 17
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Several types of Level 5, Interface / Handoff Milestones have been
defined and represent contractual agreements.
LUSI is currently monitoring 904 Interface Milestones
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 18
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 19
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Level 6 milestones have been identified as the Awards of subcontracts /
procurements and supports funding reconciliations efforts.
Planning when the budget is to be spent will support performance
measurement.
LUSI is currently monitoring 224 Award Milestones.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 20
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 21
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Project Resources and Rates
Define a set of Resources for effort to be performed by SLAC
with the appropriate planning rates.
Define a set of Resources for effort to be performed by BNL with
the appropriate planning rates.
Use the appropriate indirect rates, as defined by SLAC/BNL, and
apply to the direct rates as defined.
Apply a consistent escalation to activities as they get scheduled.
The Bay Area uses a 4% escalation rate for labor
Used standard 2.3% escalation for non-labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 22
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Integrated Schedule Development Process
Use WBS as foundation to assure 100% of scope covered
Define the detailed tasks required to accomplish the scope
Define the required resources to accomplish the tasks
Based on the detailed Basis of Estimates
Define the optimal logic relationships between tasks
Incorporate all levels of DOE and Project milestones
Incorporate all Interface / handoff milestones.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 23
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Integrated Schedule Development Process (cont.)
Validate links to confirm timephasing and float calculations are
accurate and appropriate.
Where applicable, base activity durations on recent LCLS and/or
related experience.
Define and use standard calendars throughout with all the
appropriate non-work days.
Plan for a standard work week (8 hours/day & 5 days/week) except
where appropriate.
Develop flexible and appropriate activity coding for reporting and
summarizations
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 24
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Integrated Schedule Development Process (cont.)
Because the project recognizes the importance of managing
schedule contingency like it manages money contingency, blocks
of time will be built into the schedule to mitigate the inevitable
schedule issues.
These reserves of time will be planned as activity relationship
lags between the Project controlled Level 3 milestones and the
DOE controlled Level 2 milestones.
These blocks of schedule contingency were used during the
development of the detail schedules and were removed to set
preliminary baseline dates. The blocks will be added back into
the schedule to impose control over float utilization.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 25
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
The project has reserved time between DOE level 2
milestones and DOE level 1 milestones to allow for DOE
processing:
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3a
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4a
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3b
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4b
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3c
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4a
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 26
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
For the purposes of managing Total Float, time reserves
will be set aside between project level 3 milestones and
DOE level 2 milestones:
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3a
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4a
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3b
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4b
“Project Ready” + 40 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-3c
“Project Ready” + 60 days = DOE Review + 40 days = CD-4a
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 27
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Each one of the 3 Instruments will have 100 days of schedule
contingency controlled by the project office.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 28
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
In addition to the WBS, project phase coding for each
activity will facilitate the creation of summary schedules
as well as define the budget work packages.
Management / Administration
Design / Engineering
Procurement
Subcontract
Fabrication / Assembly
Testing
Installation
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 29
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Additional activity coding will facilitate sorting, filtering
and additional summarizations
Work Breakdown Structure
Control Account number
Work Package number
Project Phase
Milestone Level
Control Account Manager name
Performance Measurement Technique
Earned Value Milestone (EVM) ID number
EVM Weight
Design Maturity
Judgment Factor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 30
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Funding Reconciliation
The project started with a “bottom-up” planning approach which
required budget authority inconsistent with the levels that were
established.
Reconciliation required the identification of opportunities and the
prioritizations of effort to adjust for funding issues at the lowest
level.
The project next used a iterative “top-down” approach to shift
entire blocks of effort to optimize the schedule flow while
accelerating the Instrument availability.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 31
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Once the schedule was iterated and a reasonable
schedule was achieved that met the project objectives
and stayed within the available funding, the
preliminary schedule baseline was established.
With a baseline established in the Primavera file, the
next step was to import the schedule data into Cobra
to create the budget baseline and to establish a
preliminary performance measurement baseline
(PMB).
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 32
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
Control Account and Work Package planning is based
entirely on the time-phasing as defined by the
schedule.
Work packages are based on the project phase and
represents the cost collection intersection with the
SLAC accounting system.
The work package is the lowest level at which earned
value is calculated.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 33
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
The majority of the near term effort for the project will
be focused on Engineering and Design.
Procurement, Subcontract, Fabrication & Assembly,
Testing and Installation work packages are coded as
Planning Packages.
The detail planning for work packages coded as
planning packages will be reassessed at the
appropriate time.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 34
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Development Process
LUSI uses only a subset of the Performance Measurement Technique
(PMT) codes used by Cobra to calculate Earned Value are coded into the
schedule as a reference
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 35
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 36
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Critical Decision Requirements
•
Employ an Earned Value Management System that is compliant with
ANSI/EIA-748-A-1998 for projects with a Total Project Cost or
Environmental Management Total Project Cost greater than or equal to
$20M. Projects having a Total Project Cost or Environmental Management
Total Project Cost between $20M and $50M must have an Earned Value
Management System that is self-certified by the contractor as ANSI/EIA748-A-1998 compliant. Projects having a Total Project Cost or
Environmental Management Total Project Cost greater than or equal to
$50M require an ANSI/EIA-748-A-1998 compliant system certified by
the Office of Engineering and Construction Management. For projects
not required to utilize an Earned Value Management System (e.g., firm
fixed-price contract projects), an alternative performance management
system must be described in the Project Execution Plan.
• Completed – SLAC/LCLS Project was reviewed and successfully
demonstrated compliance at a review in June 2008
• Subsequent to the June review a formal letter from DOE was received
confirming the compliance of the SLAC Earned Value Management
System.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 37
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Critical Decision Requirements
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 38
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Critical Decision Requirements
•
Perform a Performance Baseline Validation External Independent Review or
a Performance Baseline Validation Independent Project Review. External
Independent Reviews are conducted by the Office of Engineering and
Construction Management to validate the Performance Baseline for projects
with a Total Project Cost or Environmental Management Total Project Cost
greater than or equal to $100M. Independent Project Reviews are
conducted by the Project Management Support Office to validate the
Performance Baseline for projects with a Total Project Cost or
Environmental Management Total Project Cost less than $100 M.
• The Independent Review is to be accomplished as part of the CD-2
review
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 39
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
EIR Lines of Inquiry
EIR ELEMENT
COMMENT
1. Work Breakdown Structure
PM-391-000-96 (Structure)

2. Project Cost & Resource Loaded
Schedule
Working baselines set as of month end March 2008 for
both the schedule in P3 and the project cost in Cobra

3. Cost & Schedule Assumptions
Covered in this presentation

4. Critical Path
Critical paths for CD-4a, CD-4b and CD-4c available

5. Risk Management
Mgmt presentation

6. Funding Profile
Mgmt presentation

7. Project Controls/EVMS
Overview and status covered in this presentation

8. Basis of Design
Engineering presentation

9. Design Review
Engineering presentation

10. System Functions & Reqs
Engineering presentation

11. Sustainability
Not applicable

12. Hazards Analysis
PM-391-001-01

13. Value Management/Engineering
LUSI Value Management Plan (Doc No. PM-391-000-02)

14. Start-up Test Plan
SP-391-001-15, -16, -17 (XPP, CXI, XCS)

15. Project Execution Plan
Draft ready for signature pending CD-2 review changes


16. Acquisition Strategy
17. Integrated Project Team
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 40
CD2
Ready
This presentation & the PEP

Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 41
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Using Primavera (P3) as the Scheduling tool
Currently the statistics for the LUSI Project group with
supporting project files are:
LUSI Project Group - 4131 activities & 6159 relationships
Project Management (SLAC) - 191 activities
XPP Instrument (SLAC) - 531 activities
CXI Instrument (SLAC) - 899 activities
XCS Instrument (SLAC) - 539 activities
Diagnostics and Common Optics (SLAC) - 599 activities
Controls and Data Acquisition (SLAC) - 1297 activities
XPP and XCS Detector Systems (BNL) - 75 activities
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 42
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
LUSI Project Summary Schedule
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
=Level 1 & 2 DOE
CD-1 Approval
Sep 2007
CD-2 Review
Aug 2008
=Level 3 Project Ready
Design
(Components not part of CD-4a)
Procure / Fab / Assy / Install
XPP
Ready for CD-3a
Feb 2009
Ready for CD-4a
Jul 2010
Design
Procure / Fab / Assy / Install
(Comp. not part of CD-4b)
CXI
Ready for CD-3b
Oct 2009
Design
Ready for CD-4b
Apr 2011
Procure / Fab / Assy / Install
XCS
Ready for CD-3c
Feb 2010
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 43
Ready for CD-4c
Mar 2012
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
LUSI Critical Paths/Envelopes
Schedule Critical Path(s)
Because each Instrument represents a separate
major deliverable, critical paths have been identified
and are being monitored to the Approve Start of
Operations milestones:
CD-4a for the XPP Instrument
CD-4b for the CXI Instrument
CD-4c for the XCS Instrument
As a general rule, critical paths/envelopes are
regularly monitored for all three instruments and the
two supporting systems.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 44
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
XPP Schedule Critical Path
Driving
Milestones
LL Approval,
CD-3 & CD-4
Diffractometer
Design Effort
Diffractometer
Awards &
Vendor effort
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 45
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
XPP Schedule Critical Path
Diffractometer
deliveries to the
Installation
effort
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 46
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
CXI Schedule Critical Path
KB Mirrors
Reqmts/Design
Effort
Driving
Milestones
LL Approval,
CD-3 & CD-4
KB Mirrors
AWARD &
Vendor Design
Post Vendor
Effort and
Installation
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 47
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
CXI Schedule Critical Path
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 48
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
XCS Schedule Critical Path
Driving
Milestones
LL Approval,
CD-3, CD-4 &
Funding M/S
Delayed Design
Start due to
Funding
XCS Path moves
to DCO
Procurements
XCS Instrument
Installation effort
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 49
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
XCS Schedule Critical Path
Design & initial
procurement was
completed for the
XPP Instrument
Procurement of
DCO components
delayed to FY11
due to funding
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 50
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
XCS Schedule Critical Path
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 51
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
DCO Schedule Critical Envelope
DCO has one design effort
and multiple procurements
to support the Instrument
reqmts. The project will
monitor strings of activities
with the least float
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 52
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
DCO Schedule Critical Envelope
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 53
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
CDA Schedule Critical Envelope
CDA has multiple deliveries
to the instruments and is
heavily driven by their
needs. The project will
monitor strings of activities
with the least float
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 54
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
CDA Schedule Critical Envelope
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 55
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 56
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 57
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
M easurable Effort
Level of Effort
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 58
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor
Non-Labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 59
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 60
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Hammer
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 61
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
SLAC/LCLS
PMCS
Procedures
SLAC
Accounting
System
Schedule
Baseline
Schedule
Reports
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 62
Analysis
Tool
“Hammer”
Cost
Reports
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
LUSI Project data is now stored on the LCLS website.
https://slacspace.slac.stanford.edu/sites/LCLS%20Document%20Storage/default.aspx
Toward the bottom there’s a PMCS section.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 63
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
PMCS data will be stored and available in the folders as described. The PMCS Hammer
is an interactive tool team members will use to view, analyze data and write VARs
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 64
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
The PMCS Hammer is a utility that was customized for SLAC/LCLS that integrates
Primavera, Cobra and Accounting data for any team member to use. The LCLS
Hammer and LUSI Hammer pages are access controlled and access is granted as
appropriate.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 65
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
The Drilldown CPR and DCE will probably be the most often used utilities, but other
information is available.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 66
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
The CPR Drilldown identifies areas that have broken a threshold that requires a VAR.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 67
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Statusing and Reporting
By double-clicking on the highlight variance, the VAR form will be enabled.
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 68
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
In Conclusion
The project set preliminary schedule and budget
baselines as of March 2008.
The project team is ready for CD-2. We are ready to
formally establish a performance measurement
baseline and to proceed with the project.
Thank you for your participation
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 69
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Backup
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 70
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 71
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor
Non-Labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 72
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 73
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LaborSLAC
Non-LaborSLAC
Labor-BNL
Non-LaborBNL
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 74
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 75
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor
Non-Labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 76
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 77
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor-SLAC
Non-LaborSLAC
Labor-BNL
Non-LaborBNL
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 78
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 79
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor
Non-Labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 80
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 81
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
PMCS Status
Labor
Non-Labor
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 82
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Milestones with PO Contingency
Activity ID
Activity description
MS Level
Early
Finish
Late Finish
Total
float
PM000000
CD-0 MISSION NEED APPROVAL
L1
08/10/05A
08/10/05A
PM001000
CD-1 COST RANGE APPROVAL
L1
09/27/07A
09/27/07A
PM002000
CD-2 PERFORMANCE BASELINE APPROVED
L1
10/13/2008
3/2/2009
88
L2
8/18/2008
1/5/2009
88
L3
7/28/2008
12/1/2008
88
L1
12/10/2008 4/27/2009
88
PM002100
COMPLETE CD-2 REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
PM002150
PM002200
PROJECT READY FOR CD-2 APPROVAL
LONG LEAD PROCUREMENT APPROVED-Early Science
PM002210
PM002220
LONG LEAD AWARD - XPP DIFFRACTOMETER
L3
LONG LEAD AWARD - CXI KB MIRROR SYSTEMS
7/1/2009
7/21/2009
14
L3
7/6/2009
12/8/2009
109
PM003000
CD-3a CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XPP
L1
5/28/2009
7/2/2009
25
PM003010
COMPLETE CD-3a REQUIREMENTS - XPP
L2
4/2/2009
5/7/2009
25
L3
2/5/2009
3/12/2009
25
PM003020
PROJECT READY FOR CD-3a APPROVAL - XPP
PM003030
CD-3b CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - CXI
L1
3/8/2010
4/1/2010
18
PM003040
COMPLETE CD-3b REQUIREMENTS - CXI
L2
1/11/2010
2/4/2010
18
L3
10/29/2009 11/24/2009
PM003050
PM003060
PROJECT READY FOR CD-3b APPROVAL - CXI
CD-3c CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XCS
PM003070
COMPLETE CD-3c REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
PM003080
PM004000
PROJECT READY FOR CD-3c APPROVAL - XCS
CD-4a START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED XPP
PM004010
APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4a
18
L1
6/9/2010
10/5/2010
84
L2
4/14/2010
8/10/2010
84
L3
2/17/2010
6/15/2010
84
L1
12/17/10*
12/17/10*
0
L2
9/30/2010 10/20/2010
14
PM004020
PROJECT READY FOR CD-4a APPROVAL
L3
7/8/2010
7/28/2010
14
PM004100
CD-4b START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-CXI
L1
09/30/11*
09/30/11*
0
L2
7/12/2011
8/5/2011
18
L3
4/19/2011
5/13/2011
18
PM004110
APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4b
PM004120
PROJECT READY FOR CD-4b APPROVAL
PM004200
CD-4c START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-XPP/CXI/XCS
L1
08/31/12*
08/31/12*
0
PM004210
APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4c
L2
6/8/2012
7/6/2012
20
L3
3/16/2012
4/13/2012
20
PM004220
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 83
PROJECT READY FOR CD-4c APPROVAL
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Milestones without PO Contingency
MS Level
Early
Finish
Late Finish
PM000000 CD-0 MISSION NEED APPROVAL
L1
08/10/05A
08/10/05A
PM001000 CD-1 COST RANGE APPROVAL
L1
09/27/07A
09/27/07A
PM002000 CD-2 PERFORMANCE BASELINE APPROVED
L1
10/13/2008 7/17/2009
187
PM002100 COMPLETE CD-2 REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
L2
8/18/2008
5/22/2009
187
PM002150 PROJECT READY FOR CD-2 APPROVAL
L3
7/28/2008
5/1/2009
187
PM002200 LONG LEAD PROCUREMENT APPROVED-Early Science
L1
12/10/2008 9/11/2009
187
PM002210 LONG LEAD AWARD - XPP DIFFRACTOMETER
L3
6/23/2009
10/6/2009
75
PM002220 LONG LEAD AWARD - CXI KB MIRROR SYSTEMS
L3
7/6/2009
3/16/2010
169
PM003000 CD-3a CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XPP
L1
4/2/2009
9/24/2009
125
PM003010 COMPLETE CD-3a REQUIREMENTS - XPP
L2
2/5/2009
7/30/2009
125
PM003020 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3a APPROVAL - XPP
L3
2/5/2009
7/30/2009
125
PM003030 CD-3b CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - CXI
L1
1/11/2010
6/24/2010
118
PM003040 COMPLETE CD-3b REQUIREMENTS - CXI
L2
10/29/2009 4/29/2010
118
PM003050 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3b APPROVAL - CXI
L3
10/29/2009 4/29/2010
118
PM003060 CD-3c CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XCS
L1
4/14/2010
1/13/2011
184
PM003070 COMPLETE CD-3c REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
L2
2/17/2010
11/2/2010
184
PM003080 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3c APPROVAL - XCS
L3
2/17/2010
11/2/2010
184
PM004000 CD-4a START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED XPP
L1
12/17/10*
12/17/10*
0
PM004010 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4a
L2
7/7/2010
10/20/2010
75
PM004020 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4a APPROVAL
L3
7/7/2010
10/20/2010
75
PM004100 CD-4b START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-CXI
L1
09/30/11*
09/30/11*
0
PM004110 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4b
L2
3/25/2011
8/5/2011
95
PM004120 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4b APPROVAL
L3
3/25/2011
8/5/2011
95
PM004200 CD-4c START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-XPP/CXI/XCS
L1
08/31/12*
08/31/12*
0
PM004210 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4c
L2
3/16/2012
7/6/2012
80
PM004220 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4c APPROVAL
L3
3/16/2012
7/6/2012
80
Activity ID
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 84
Activity description
Total
float
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu
Milestones with no Funding Limits
Total
float
MS Level
Early
Finish
Late Finish
PM000000 CD-0 MISSION NEED APPROVAL
L1
08/10/05A
08/10/05A
PM001000 CD-1 COST RANGE APPROVAL
L1
09/27/07A
09/27/07A
PM002000 CD-2 PERFORMANCE BASELINE APPROVED
L1
10/13/2008 7/17/2009
187
PM002100 COMPLETE CD-2 REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
L2
8/18/2008
5/22/2009
187
PM002150 PROJECT READY FOR CD-2 APPROVAL
L3
7/28/2008
5/1/2009
187
PM002200 LONG LEAD PROCUREMENT APPROVED-Early Science
L1
12/10/2008 9/11/2009
187
PM002210 LONG LEAD AWARD - XPP DIFFRACTOMETER
L3
6/23/2009
10/6/2009
75
PM002220 LONG LEAD AWARD - CXI KB MIRROR SYSTEMS
L3
4/2/2009
3/16/2010
236
PM003000 CD-3a CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XPP
L1
4/2/2009
9/24/2009
125
PM003010 COMPLETE CD-3a REQUIREMENTS - XPP
L2
2/5/2009
7/30/2009
125
PM003020 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3a APPROVAL - XPP
L3
2/5/2009
7/30/2009
125
PM003030 CD-3b CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - CXI
L1
1/11/2010
6/24/2010
118
PM003040 COMPLETE CD-3b REQUIREMENTS - CXI
L2
10/29/2009 4/29/2010
118
PM003050 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3b APPROVAL - CXI
L3
10/29/2009 4/29/2010
118
PM003060 CD-3c CONSTRUCTION START APPROVED - XCS
L1
1/11/2010
1/13/2011
251
PM003070 COMPLETE CD-3c REQUIREMENTS - XPP / CXI / XCS
L2
10/29/2009 11/2/2010
251
PM003080 PROJECT READY FOR CD-3c APPROVAL - XCS
L3
10/29/2009 11/2/2010
251
PM004000 CD-4a START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED XPP
L1
12/17/10*
12/17/10*
0
PM004010 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4a
L2
7/7/2010
10/20/2010
75
PM004020 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4a APPROVAL
L3
7/7/2010
10/20/2010
75
PM004100 CD-4b START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-CXI
L1
09/30/11*
09/30/11*
0
PM004110 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4b
L2
2/23/2011
8/5/2011
117
PM004120 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4b APPROVAL
L3
2/23/2011
8/5/2011
117
PM004200 CD-4c START OF OPERATIONS APPROVED-XPP/CXI/XCS
L1
08/31/12*
08/31/12*
0
PM004210 APPROVED: Instrument Readiness Review - CD-4c
L2
10/6/2011
7/6/2012
182
PM004220 PROJECT READY FOR CD-4c APPROVAL
L3
10/6/2011
7/6/2012
182
Activity ID
LUSI DOE Review August 20, 2008
PMCS Overview
p. 85
Activity description
Felix B. Fernandez
fbf@slac.stanford.edu