ES&H Status of Construction and
Technical System Installations
Michael Scharfenstein
Project ES&H Coordinator
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
1
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
Subcontracted Work Goals
GC managed
Injury rate concern
Project responsibility
90 days of field work remaining
The goal is Zero future incidents
CF & Technical Systems Installation
Maintaining exemplary safety record
Direct subcontractor management
Detailed work planning
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
2
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
Project-specific ISEMS Implementation
LCLS Directorate Integrated Safety Management Plan
LCLS Work Authorization Procedure
LCLS Project ES&H Plan
Job Safety Analysis
Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings
PM/UTR manages each subcontract
Leads to success
TCCO Project Health and Safety Plan
Job Safety Analysis
Daily Pre-Task Planning Meeting
Pre-Task Checklist
Superintendents assigned geographically
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
3
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE
Through April 2008
DART Rate
4
Total Project Hours
1.8 M Hours worked
3.5
3
SubContractors
484 K Hours worked
DART Rate 3.7 (9 Incidents)
TRC Rate 4.6 (2 Incidents)
LCLS
Contractors
3.2
2.5
LCLS
Collaboration
2
Total Project
1.5
1
LCLS Collaboration
1,300 K Hours worked
DART Rate 0.3 (2 Incidents)
Construction
Industry
3.7
1.2
0.5
0
0.3
Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort. DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate
of < 0.25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0.65 per 100 FTEs.
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
4
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
Project Safety
(Contractor/Technical Systems/Collaboration)
April 2008 DART Rate Distribution
LCLS Subs
98K Hrs
DART = 0
TRC = 0
TCCo
375K Hrs
DART = 4.8
TRC = 5.9
LCLS
1.3M Hrs
DART = 0.31
TRC = 0.31
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
5
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
TCCo Incident Distribution
14
12
10
8
Procedural
Injuries
Notices
6
4
2
0
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 5th Qtr 6th Qtr
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
6
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
TCCo Stewardship
October ’06 thru April ’07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural
Violations
Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting
Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate
Check/correction of existing documentation
PMT changes
Deficiency Notices
May ’07 thru November ’07 Full Production : Injuries
Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan
Procedural violations transition to injures
Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors
PE changes
Deficiency Notices & Fines
Communication with Corporate TCCo
Safety Stewardship Committee Established
Full time on-site medic (+30hr OSHA)
UTRs added – focus on safety
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
7
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
TCCo Stewardship cont’d
December ’07 thru April ’08 : Injuries continue
Two incident associated with one sub
PM removed
Work stopped
90 Days (to the end of field work)
Focus on effective work planning & execution sought
Plan for joint observation developed
Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings
JSA review with workers throughout the day
Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices
Must communicate with the worker
The goal is Zero!
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
8
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
CF & Technical Systems Stewardship
Excellent Safety Record
100K+ hours w/o injury
S20, MMF, Injector, BC 1 & 2
Issues addressed immediately
Positive Results
Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers
Direct management of subcontractors
Communicate ES&H Expectations
Guide them to success
Enforcement when needed
Thorough Work Planning and Control
Aggressive ISM management
Ownership of safety a condition of employment
The goal is to maintain Zero!
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
9
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
Conclusion
Past TCCo safety performance is not
acceptable
LCLS providing more prescriptive direction
Past 2 months = acceptable performance
Maintain CF & Technical System direct
managed work performance
The goal is Zero!
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
10
scharf@slac.stanford.edu
end of presentation
June 17, 2008
FAC Review
Michael Scharfenstein
11
scharf@slac.stanford.edu