 Project Status Commissioning Preparation for First Experiments

advertisement
LCLS Project Overview and Assessment
16 June 2008
Project Status
Commissioning
Preparation for First Experiments
Charge to FAC
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
1
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
2005 Project Baseline
Revised Baseline
TEC $315M, TPC $379M
CD-4 3/2009 Start of
Operations
TEC $352M, TPC $420M
Early Finish 7/2009 Start
Near Hall Ops
Characterize x-ray flux @ 1.5
Angstroms, in front end
enclosure (FEE)
Detect X-rays in the Far
Experimental Hall
Characterize x-ray flux at 1.5
Angstroms, in front-end
enclosure
Detect X-rays in the Near
Experimental Hall
CD-4 7/2010 Project
Complete
Detect X-rays in the Far
Experiment Hall
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
2
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Construction
>82% complete
Table 2; Linac Coherent Light Source Re-Baselined Funding Profile ($M)
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY051 FY06 FY072 FY08 FY09
0
5.93 7.46 49.67 84.69 101.16 51.35 36.50
TEC
0
2.00
4.00
3.50 13.00 15.50 17.00
OPC 1.50
TPC 1.50 5.93 9.46 53.67 88.19 114.16 66.85 53.50
1
2
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
FY10 Total
15.24 352.00
11.50 68.00
26.74 420.00
FY2005 TEC funding includes $29,760,000 for long lead procurements.
FY07 TPC funding reflects the ~$8M reduction as a result of the FY2007 CR and directed change.
3
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS Cost/Schedule Status Report
30-Apr-08
Cumulative to Date ($K)
WBS
Budgeted Cost
Work
Scheduled
Work
Performed
Actual Cost
Work
Performed
Variance
Schedule
Budget At
Complete
($K)
Performance Indices
Cost
SPI
CPI
% Complete
1.1 Project Management
19,171
19,171
19,140
0
31
1.00
1.00
22,822
84%
1.2 Injector
20,239
20,239
20,237
0
2
1.00
1.00
20,239
100%
1.3 Linac
24,882
24,166
23,618
-717
548
0.97
1.02
28,257
86%
1.4 Undulator
41,140
40,455
41,429
-685
-974
0.98
0.98
45,355
89%
1.5 X-ray Transport
21,319
20,827
21,511
-491
-684
0.98
0.97
27,494
76%
2,785
2,734
2,793
-50
-58
0.98
0.98
9,115
30%
114,437
113,902
113,565
-535
337
1.00
1.00
136,040
84%
29,236
28,926
28,749
-310
177
0.99
1.01
41,369
70%
273,210
270,421
271,042
-2,788
-621
0.99
1.00
330,691
82%
1.6 X-ray Endstations
1.9 Conventional Facilities
1.X LCLS Controls
1 LCLS Total Base Cost
LCLS Total Estimated Cost
2.1 LCLS Project Mgmt, Planning & Admn (OPC)
352,000
Contingency
21,309
% Contingency on ETC
35.4%
15,181
15,181
15,074
0
108
1.00
1.01
24,246
63%
2.2 Injector (OPC)
5,252
5,281
5,399
28
-118
1.01
0.98
5,789
91%
2.3 Linac (OPC)
1,226
1,226
1,189
0
37
1.00
1.03
2,027
60%
2.4 Undulator (OPC)
4,430
4,424
3,841
-7
582
1.00
1.15
9,772
45%
2.5 X-ray Transport (OPC)
2,098
2,064
1,874
-34
190
0.98
1.10
3,861
53%
2.6 X-ray Endstations (OPC)
1,798
1,798
1,852
0
-54
1.00
0.97
8,089
22%
2.9 Conventional Facilities (OPC)
411
388
319
-24
68
0.94
1.21
1,865
21%
2.X LCLS Controls (OPC)
940
898
769
-41
129
0.96
1.17
2,815
32%
31,337
31,260
30,317
-77
942
1.00
1.03
58,463
53%
2 LCLS Total Other Project Cost
LCLS Other Project Cost
68,000
Management Reserve
9,537
% Management Reserve on ETC
LCLS Total Project Cost
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
304,547
301,681
301,359
4
-2,866
321
0.99
35.1%
1.00
420,000
78%
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
WBS 1.2 LCLS Injector
100% Complete
WBS 1.3 LCLS Linac
86% Complete
Commissioning Complete
3/2008
Commissioning Complete 9/2007
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
5
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS UNDULATOR SYSTEM
5/33 rf Beam Position Monitors @
SLAC
8/33 Beam Finder Wires
Wire Position Monitor RFI @ SLAC
Hydrostatic level system RFI @
SLAC
WBS 1.4 Undulator
>89% complete
ANL: 95% complete
33/33 Undulators +6 spares @ SLAC
33/33 Quadrupoles +4 @ SLAC
19 quad. vac. spools @ SLAC
10 RFBPMs @ SLAC
33/33 Supports with movers @ SLAC
15/33 Beam Finder Wires @ SLAC
Aluminum extrusions all @ SLAC
Components at varying stages of prep./readiness
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
6
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Beam Finder
Wire
Quadrupole
(RFBPM HIDDEN)
Vacuum Chamber
(aligned, under a
protective cover
Undulator
Rollaway Rails
Pedestal
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
Cam
Mover
7
Support John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Girder
Successful chamber alignment & integration with undulator
Shim interference with undulator motion- now resolved
8 Girders assembled, one fully aligned
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
8
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Undulator Ctl/Diag racks awaiting shipment from ANL
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
9
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
X-Ray Transport/Optics/Diagnostics
WBS 1.5 is >76% complete
Front end X-ray optics being assembled
All mirrors ordered; soft X-ray mirror figure meets spec
Most diagnostics under assembly at LLNL
Gas
Detector
Hard x-ray
Monochromator
(K Spectrometer)
Solid
Attenuator
Slit
Gas
Attenuator
e-
Gas
Detector
FAC
Project Overview
Soft X-Ray
Offset mirror
system
Direct
Imager
Pulse
Energy
Thermal
Detector
Muon
Shield
June 16, 2008
5 mm
collimator
Hard X-Ray
Offset mirror
system
LLNL
10
Start of
Experimental
Hutches
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Integration and Testing at LLNL: Fixed Mask, Slit, Pump Cart,
Control Racks
Fixed Mask
Slit
Control Racks
Beam Direction
Pump Cart
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
11
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
WBS 1.6 XR End Stations >30% complete
LCLS
LUSI
LUSI
LUSI
1.5, 1.6 procurements delayed to start of FY2009 in response to FY2007 BA cut
Prompt budget authorization for 1Q2009 requested to minimize schedule risk
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
12
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
1.9 Conventional Facilities >84% complete
Turner Construction Co. >89% complete
Undulator
Hall
(175m)
Linac-to-Undulator (227m)
Beam Dump
(40M)
Front End
(29m)
Near
Expt’l.
Hall
Far
Expt’l.
Hall
X-ray
Transport
(200m)
14 m
Near Experimental Hall
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
64.6 m
13
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LUSI Status
Instrument scientists on board
Successful DOE Conceptual Design Review
CD1 approved
Continuing Resolution: FY2008 budget reduced from $10M to $6M
2009 budget requested $15M, will surely be delayed by CR
Extraordinary situation with 2010 budget – restoration of $4M FY2008 cut in FY2011?
Schedule impact being assessed
LUSI CD2 review late 18 August 2008 – baseline for XPP, CXI, XCS
LUSI-LCLS Interface Working Group recent business:
Conventional facilities – hutch design
Controls/Data acquisition – Details of data flow, storage, interface to detectors
Precisely defining LUSI/LCLS interfaces
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
14
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LTU system installation
6/10/08
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
15
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
UNDULATOR HALL
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
16
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Undulator stands installed
Getting filled with sand
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
17
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
John N. Galayda
NEAR EXPERIMENTAL
HALL SUBBASEMENT
18
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Far Hall rebar lattice
Tunnel construction complete 25 April 2008
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
19
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Oscillator
Diode Pump Laser
Laser Performance
Reliability has been excellent
>99% availability
Hot spare pump laser in place for JEDI
CW Pump for multi-pass amp. is planned
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
20
Cathode spot
size control
tFWHM  John
6.5 ps
N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Gun probes upgrade completed
120 Hz capability
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
21
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Projected Emittance in the Injector (0.25 nC)
gex = 0.89 μm
sx,y  60 mm
OTR Screen at 135 MeV
routine result
gey = 0.92 μm
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
22
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Coherent Effects in Optical Transition Radiation Diagnostic
Total light energy disproportionate
with chargeStill hampers use of OTR screens
A. Fisher, J. Frisch looking at the
properties of COTR
Can be controlled with “laser
heater”, due ~ 1/2009
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
23
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
LCLS-Quality Beam Demonstrated
Electron beam emittance
measurements
9.2 GeV point in linac
0.25 nC, 75 fs
14 GeV e-beam can
deliver
~1012 photons
@ 8 keV
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
24
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Commissioning Readiness Process
LCLS, SSO planning readiness process
through e-beam dump and x-ray front-end
enclosure to support January 2009 start of ebeam/FEL commissioning
Near Hall Hutch Readiness Review to
support start of experiments in July 2009
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
25
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
First Light
in FEH
CD-4 (7/31/2010)
FEH Install
First Light
in FEE
X-Rays in NEH
FEH Hutch BO
PPS Cert. LTU/Dump
FEE/NEH Install
LTU/Und/Dump Install
now
PEP-II run ends
LCLS Installation and Commissioning Time-Line
PPS
J F M AM J J A S ON D J F MAM
AM J J A S ON D J F M A M J J
Down
2008
2009
2010
Linac/BC2
Commissioning
Re-commission
Inj/BC2 to SL2
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
LTU/Und
Comm.
FEE
Comm.
26
AMO
Experiment
program
begins
XPP
Experiment
program
begins
April 18, 2008
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Safety
Good safety record for LCLS collaboration & contract work managed directly by
LCLS
LCLS has been pro-active in interfacing to SLAC safety management policy/procedures
LCLS/SLAC set appropriate standards for civil construction
Safety record for TCCo-managed construction has been poor
LCLS/TCCo have struggled with this issue
4th PE, 2nd PM, 2nd Super, 3rd ESH
Exerted major effort to communicate LCLS expectations to TCCo upper management
Generally good response since 11/2007
TCCo engagement was encouraging
Active involvement of TCCo VP in safety management
TCCo response was encouraging BUT
Two serious incidents (1/2008, 4/2008)
Quality of Pre-task Planning by subcontractors – enforcement of LCLS standards was inadequate
Enforce good pre-task planning
Finish the job with NO ADDITIONAL INJURIES
SSO has been a resource
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
27
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE
Through May 2008
DART Rate
4
Total Project Hours
3.5
1.82 M Hours worked
3
SubContractors
Construction
Industry
3.7
LCLS
Contractors
3.2
2.5
490 K Hours worked
DART Rate 3.7 (9 Incidents)
TRC Rate 4.5 (2 Incidents)
LCLS
Collaboration
2
Total Project
1.5
LCLS Collaboration
1
1,329 K Hours worked
DART Rate 0.3 (2 Incidents)
1
0.5
0
0.3
.
Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0.25 and a Days Away,
Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0.65 per 100 FTEs.
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
28
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES SAFE WORK
Project (Turner) Safety Performance History
LCLS Prepares for Field Work to begin
Safety Record as part of selection process
Site Safety and Health Plan
Driving home the message
Result: Procedural Violations
Actions
Stand Down of Construction Activities
Review of Approval Process for field work
Review of Project safety statistics – Analyze Hazards / Define Controls inadequate
Check/correction of existing documentation
Turner Construction “in full swing”
Data points indicate rising trends (near misses)
Paperwork trivialized by CM/GC and trade contractors
Result: Injury to Concrete Pump Operator
Actions:
Stand Down of Construction Activities
CM/GC and trade Personnel changes / fines levied
Letter to Turner Corporate
Joint Safety Stewardship Committee established
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
29
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES SAFE WORK
Safety Performance (continued)
Turner Construction “over the hump”
Injury rate increases (DART rate above national average)
Turner personnel and trade personnel changes / fines levied
Tunnel contractor begins to de-mobilize
Result: Serious injuries (shoulder and hand)
Actions:
Work Activity stopped.
Trade personnel changes made
Safety statistics reviewed – Perform the Work inadequate
Letter to Turner Corporate
Plan for joint observation and monitoring of the work planning and execution
prepared.
Review of JSA / Pre-task meeting notes
Attendance at each Pre-task meeting (Turner augmented by CF UTRs)
Monitoring Specific trade contractors or activities for safe work practices
We own Safety. It is our obligation to complete the project injury
free!
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
30
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Key Issues
Safety
Extraordinary collaboration with TCCo for the
next four months
Early Science
Installation activities preceding BO
Assembly/alignment/installation of undulators
Complete X-Ray Front End and AMO Instrument
FY2009 CR – Early BA
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
31
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Target Running Schedule – Operation Hours
2009: AMO, SXR
2010: AMO, SXR, XPP
2011: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI
2012: AMO, SXR, XPP, CXI, XCS
HED?
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
32
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Guidance for First Round of Proposals
Early ops
Mature
Electron energy
4.3 GeV
4.3 GeV
Repetition rate
30 Hz
120 Hz
Bunch length
200 fs FWHM
200 fs FWHM
FEL peak power
500 MW
5 GW
FEL bandwidth
0.25%
0.2%
Energy per pulse
0.1 mJ
2 mJ
Photons/0.1%BW
3 1011
1 1013
Peak brightness
3 1030
3 1031
Average brightness
2 1019
2 1021
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
33
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Access to LCLS Information
LCLS Web Page
http://lcls.slac.stanford.edu/
Proposal Submission
Through LCLS web page
Will go live at end of June 2008
AMO Workshop 2-3 June 2008
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/amo/2008/
60 registrants – very useful outcomes
XPP Workshop 20-21 June 2008
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/xpp
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
34
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Operations Organization
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
35
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Charge to FAC Committee
Assess Installation Planning
Identify technical risks remaining in
Photon Beam Systems
LUSI
Assess Controls Applications Strategy
Comments on risks
Manpower, priorities
Assess Commissioning Plans
Advise on how best to integrate LUSI into FAC
mission
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
36
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
End of Presentation
June 16, 2008
FAC
Project Overview
37
John N. Galayda
galayda@slac.stanford.edu
Download