Dean of Student Success

advertisement
Dean of Student Success
The following pages are designed to guide your analysis of Strategic Outcome Assessments by your Unit and Programs. Please
feel free to contact me if you have questions or need assistance.
Step 1. Pease make an appointment with me to discuss the purpose and function of the outcome assessment for strategic
plans. Unit-level and program-level assessments are designed to create a comprehensive approach to assessing progress
toward achieving the mission of the institution.
Step 2. Please respond to all three of your Programs individually based on their pre-approved strategic plan, as well as
completing an assessment report for the Student Success Unit as a whole. Please use the included Strategic Planning Outcome
Assessment Feedback Form (2012-2013) for crafting feedback to your programs.
Step 3. If any of your three programs revised their strategic plan for 2013/2014, you will also provide feedback to those
programs about the changes presented. Please use the Strategic Plan Review (2013/2014) Form to assist you with this
feedback.
Step 4. It is important for the integration of the strategic plan into the culture of the university for you to meet with the myriad
of staff in your units. Meetings can be arranged at the nit level or with programs individually. It is important that reviews of
program outcome assessment reports are communicated.
Step 5. Since programs may be completing revisions of the plans for their work this academic year, it is imperative that your
feedback be given to your programs as early as possible. To that end, please submit the following to the Director of Strategic
Planning no later than December 20, 2013:
1. Copies of all Program Outcome Assessments for 2012/2013
2. Copies of all revised strategic plans for Programs for 2013/2014,
3. A copy of your Unit’s Student Success Strategic Planning Outcome Assessment 2012/2013, and
4. A copy of your 2013/2104 Student Success Strategic Plan
Student Success
Strategic Planning Outcome Assessment Feedback Form (2012-2013)
Student Living
Program: _________________________________________________________________________
Teaching
& Learning
University Strategic Objective
1.1
1.2
Inclusiveness &
Diversity
2.1
1. Insights
2.2
2.3
NA
NA
Scholarship &
Creative
Expression
3.1
3.2
NA
NA
Public Service &
Community
Engagement
4.1
4.2
4.3
NA
NA
Resource Development
& Stewardship
5.1
NA
5.2
5.3
NA
NA
a. Results of analyses for these objectives
x
x
x
x
revealed positive movement:
b. Results of analyses for these objectives
x
revealed further attention needed:
c. Suggestions for location of missing data or information that can be provided to allow for robust measurement:
5.4
x
1.1 Additional data collection and assessment needed to determine satisfaction levels in LLC’s.
2. Linkages
a. It is clear to see how movement in this
area resulted in or will result in benefit(s)
to students:
b. These objectives were reported
2012/2013 (x), and these additional
objectives will be addressed 2013/20014
(+). [Blanks mean department/unit has yet
to address objective.]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Comments:
NA
3. Data-Driven Decisions
Department/Unit shows plans to utilize
data gathered to improve program
outcomes in these areas:
Comment:
x
x
NA
NA
x
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
x
NA
x
Student Living does a very good job of assessing the quality of their programs and services, and uses data to inform decisions.
4. Revised Strategic Plan 2013/2014
Comment: (Please see attached “Revised Strategic Plan Review 2013/2014)
* X = appropriate, - = deficiency, NA = not applicable
Strategic Planning Outcome Assessment Feedback Form (2012-2013)
Student Success
Program: _________________________Student Living________________________________
Additional Comments:
Strategic Plan Review (2013/2014)
Teaching &
Learning
University Strategic Objective
Outcomes
Matches correct university
objective (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
1.1
1.2
Inclusiveness &
Diversity
2.1
Scholarship &
Creative
Expression
3.1
3.2
Public Service &
Community
Engagement
4.1
4.2
4.3
2.2
2.3
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Resource Development &
Stewardship
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
X
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
=
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
Indicators/Criterion
X
Measureable: provides comparable
data – trend, peer (12/13)
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
Clear in language and intent
(12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Comprehensive: breadth and
depth (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Measureable – mismatching
activities for outcomes (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Matches aligned indicators,
strategies, and resources (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
(Revised for 13/14)
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
Meaningful: relevant and
informational (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Manageable: data sources available
(12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
=
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
Clear Standards/Expectations
(12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Strategies/Initiatives
Impactful in realizing outcome
attainment (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
Resources & Budget
Identified: human, physical,
monetary (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
Connected to strategies and
initiatives (12/13)
(Revised for 13/14)
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
X
X
X
X
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
NA
NA
X
* X = appropriate, - = deficiency, NA = not applicable
Comments:
Unmet financial needs are a challenge for Student Rights and Responsibility (zero dollars budgeted), Threat Assessment (zero
dollars budgeted), and Orientation (zero dollars budgeted) and will potentially hamper the ability of those units to be
successful in meeting goals.
Strategic Plan Review 2013/2014
Student Success
Program: _________________________Student Living________________________________
Additional Comments:
Student Living recognizes that data collection regarding the performance of and satisfaction of students in the LLC’s is
a priority, and has developed goals for 2013-14 to include addressing that concern.
Finding resources to overcome financial challenges in three areas: Rights and Responsibilities, Orientation and
Threat Assessment will be a priority. Lack of resources is a constant threat to our success in those areas.
Rubric/Checklist Areas for Revised Strategic Plan 2013/2014
Outcomes
Matches correct university objective
Clear in language and intent
Comprehensive (breadth and depth)
Measureable – (mismatching activities for outcomes)
Matches aligned indicators, strategies, and resources
Indicators/Criterion
Measureable (provides comparable data – trend, peer)
Meaningful (relevant and informational)
Manageable (data sources available)
Clear Standards/Expectations
Strategies/Initiatives
Impactful in realizing outcome attainment
Resources & Budget
Identified (human, physical, monetary)
Connected to strategies and initiatives
(Use this to assist completing the Strategic Plan Review 2013/2014 form to evaluate the revised Unit Revised Strategic Plans
for 2013/2014. It may be easier to just add a line below each line on the review of your Unit’s 2012-2013 Strategic Plan that
was submitted to you last year.)
Download